Transmural myocardial infarction with sumatriptan

Cardiovascular adverse events associated with triptans for treatment of migraine: a pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS)

The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between triptans (sumatriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan) and cardiovascular (CV) adverse events with data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). FAERS database was used to collect data on triptans from 1997 to 2023. Disproportionality methods were utilized to quantify triptan-associated CV events and to identify the potential risk. The reporting odds ratio was used to identify the risk signals. CV outcomes related to age, sex, clinical results, and other factors were also examined for triptans; 820 reports involving the triptans were recognized as CV adverse events out of total of 12 699 reports that were gathered from on FAERS database. Women reported more CV adverse events with rizatriptan and zolmitriptan as compared to men. The CV adverse event risk was highest among individuals aged 18-64. Clinical outcome analysis showed that sumatriptan carries a higher CV risk than rizatriptan and zolmitriptan, and most deaths and serious cases have been documented for sumatriptan. The patients prescribed sumatriptan or zolmitriptan were at a higher risk of reporting CV events for chest pain and chest discomfort, compared to rizatriptan. This finding may provide support for the clinical observation and risk evaluation of triptan treatment.

Real-world study of adverse events associated with triptan use in migraine treatment based on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

BACKGROUND

Triptans selectively agoniste 5-Hydroxytryptamine(5-HT) receptors and are widely used in the treatment of migraine. Nevertheless, there is a dearth of comprehensive real-world clinical research on the safety of triptans. In light of the growing prevalence of migraine, it is imperative to gain a deeper understanding of the true extent of adverse events (AEs) associated with triptans in the clinical management of migraine.

METHODS

A database query of AEs reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for triptans was performed using the online platform Open Vigil 2.1. The query spanned the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2023 and extracted all AEs for 'sumatriptan', 'zolmitriptan', 'rizatriptan', and 'naratriptan' from the 15-49 years old population and retrospective quantitative analyses. A proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) methodology were utilized to contrast AEs across the four triptans.

RESULTS

A total of 1.272 AEs reports for sumatriptan, 114 for zolmitriptan, 162 for rizatriptan, and 15 for naratriptan were identified. The ratio of females to males was approximately three times higher in all cases, with the highest number of reports originating from the Americas. A review of the FAERS database revealed that nervous system disorders were the primary SOC category for four drugs, with all four drugs exhibiting the AE indicative of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, also classified as Nervous system disorders. The most frequently reported AE signal for sumatriptan was dyspnea, which is classified as respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders. The most frequently reported AEs signals for the remaining three drugs were nausea, vomiting and terminal ileitis, all of which are classified as gastrointestinal disorders.

CONCLUSION

Analyses have demonstrated that AEs are present in a range of systems, including cardiac, nervous, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal disorders. It should be noted, however, that the incidence and signal intensity of these AEs vary depending on the specific drug in question. In clinical practice, the selection of an appropriate drug and the monitoring of AEs should be tailored to the individual patient's and specific characteristics.

Cluster headache: state of the art in treatment

Cluster headache (CH) is the most common and devastating autonomic headache with multiple and recent advances in treatment. However, it usually goes unrecognized and is found to have a delayed and inappropriate treatment. This paper aims to review the current therapeutic options for patients with CH. We conducted a narrative literature review on the treatments available for this condition using the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) classification of therapeutic evidence. We found effective and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies with heterogeneity of clinical trial designs for patients with CH, and they are divided into three phases, namely, transitional, acute, and preventive interventions. Prednisone (A) is the most studied treatment in the transitional phase; acute attacks are treated using triptans (A), oxygen (A), and non-invasive transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (A). Verapamil (A) and monoclonal antibodies (possible A) are considered the first options in preventive treatments, followed by multiple pharmacological and non-pharmacological options in prophylactic treatments. In conclusion, numerous effective and safe treatments are available in treating patients with episodic, chronic, and pharmacoresistant CH according to the clinical profile of each patient.

Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Death in Migraine Patients Treated with Triptans

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to determine the strength of association between treatment with triptans and acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and death.

BACKGROUND

Case reports in the literature have raised concerns over an association between treatment of migraine headaches with triptans and cardiovascular events. This study aims to systematically evaluate this association in a contemporary population-based cohort. We hypothesized that triptan exposure is not associated with increased cardiovascular events.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted within an integrated healthcare delivery system in Southern California. From January 2009 to December 2018, 189,684 patients age ≥18 years had a diagnosis of migraine. In this group, 130,656 were exposed to triptans. Patients treated with triptans were matched 1:1 to those not exposed to triptans by using a propensity score. The primary outcome was acute myocardial infarction; secondary outcomes were heart failure, all-cause death, and combined acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and death.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of acute myocardial infarction was 0.67 per 1000 person-year in triptan-exposed vs 1.44 per 1000 person-year in not exposed patients. In propensity-matched analyses, the adjusted hazard ratio for triptan exposure was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.08) for acute myocardial infarction; 1.00 (95% CI 0.93-1.08) for all-cause death; 0.93 (95% CI 0.81-1.08) for heart failure; and 0.99 (95% CI 0.93-1.06) for a composite of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or death. Sensitivity analyses focusing on stratified subgroups based on age, gender, ethnicity, and several cardiac risk factors also revealed no significant association between triptan exposure and cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was found between exposure to triptans and an increased risk of cardiovascular events. These data provide reassurance regarding the cardiovascular safety of utilizing triptans for the medical management of migraine headaches.

QTC Dispersion and P-Wave Dispersion during Migraine Attacks

The aim of this study was to investigate increase of QTc dispersion and P-wave dispersion during migraine attacks. Fifty-five patients (16–65 years of age, 49 women, six men) with migraine were included in our study. Heart rate, QTc interval, maximum and minimum QTc interval, QTc dispersion, maximum and minimum P-wave duration and P-wave dispersion were measured from 12-lead ECG recording during migraine attacks and pain-free periods. ECGs were transferred to a personal computer via a scanner and then used for magnification of x400 by Adobe Photoshop software. Maximum QTc interval (454 ± 24 ms vs. 429 ± 23 ms, P < 0.001), QTc interval (443 ± 26 ms vs. 408 ± 22 ms, P <0.001) and QTc dispersion (63 ± 18 ms vs. 43 ± 14 ms, P <0.001) were found significantly higher during migraine attacks compared with pain-free periods. Maximum P-wave duration (107 ± 11 ms vs. 100 ± 11 ms, P <0.001) and P-wave dispersion (45 ± 13 ms vs. 35 ± 13 ms, P <0.001) were found higher during migraine attacks than pain-free periods. We concluded that migraine attacks are associated with increased QTc and P-wave dispersion compared with pain-free periods.

Multidrug toxicity involving sumatriptan

A multidrug fatality involving sumatriptan is reported. Sumatriptan is a tryptamine derivative that acts at 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors and is used for the treatment of migraines. The decedent was a 21-year-old white female found dead in bed by her spouse. No signs of physical trauma were observed and a large number of prescription medications were discovered at the scene. Toxicological analysis of the central blood revealed sumatriptan at a concentration of 1.03 mg/L. Following therapeutic dosing guidelines, sumatriptan concentrations do not exceed 0.095 mg/L. Sumatriptan was isolated by solid-phase extraction and analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in multiple reaction monitoring mode. A tissue distribution study was completed with the following concentrations measured: 0.61 mg/L in femoral blood, 0.56 mg/L in iliac blood, 5.01 mg/L in urine, 0.51 mg/kg in liver, 3.66 mg/kg in kidney, 0.09 mg/kg in heart, 0.32 mg/kg in spleen, 0.01 mg/kg in brain, 15.99 mg/kg in lung and 78.54 mg/45 mL in the stomach contents. Carisoprodol, meprobamate, fluoxetine, doxylamine, orphenadrine, dextromethorphan and hydroxyzine were also present in the blood at the following concentrations: 3.35, 2.36, 0.63, 0.19, 0.06, 0.55 and 0.16 mg/L. The medical examiner ruled the cause of death as acute mixed drug toxicity and the manner of death as accident.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of zolmitriptan for the treatment of migraines

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a multifactorial neurovascular disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of disabling pain attacks, accompanied with gastrointestinal, neurological systems dysfunction. The pharmacologic treatment of migraine is classically divided in the management of the acute attack and preventive strategies. Acute treatments consist of triptan, ergot, opioid, antiemetic and NSAIDs.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of zolmitriptan . The data were obtained by searching the following keywords in MEDLINE: zolmitriptan, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, triptans, migraine, menstrual-related migraine, cluster headache, relatively to the period 1989 - 2012.

EXPERT OPINION

Zolmitriptan has been considered effective treatment in the acute phase of migraine, menstrual-related migraine and cluster headache attacks. Pharmacokinetic parameters may vary as a consequence of gender differences, inter- and intra-subjects variability and delivery system. Zolmitriptan was developed with the aim of obtaining a lipophilic compound in order to be more rapidly absorbed and centrally active. Pharmacologically, pharmacokinetic parameters are responsible for its wide efficacy and the limited adverse effect profile.

Tachyphylaxis to the sumatriptan-induced contractile effect in the human uterine artery but not in human cerebral blood vessels: pharmacological demonstration of the 5-HT(1B) receptor functionality loss

The in vitro contractile response of the human uterine artery to sumatriptan was compared to that of human cerebral blood vessels. Artery rings were prepared for isometric contraction. Tachyphylaxis to the triptan-induced vascular contraction was observed in the uterine artery, but not in basilar and middle cerebral arteries. To evaluate 5-HT(1) receptor subtypes functionality, concentration-response curves to sumatriptan were performed at 0 and 24 h after uterine artery isolation. Both 10 μmol/l cyanopindolol and 63 nmol/l SB 224,289 (5-HT(1B) receptor antagonists) significantly antagonized the contractile response induced by sumatriptan at 0 h but not after 24 h of uterine artery isolation. The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist BRL 15,572 at 10 μmol/l significantly antagonized the sumatriptan contractile response at both experimental conditions. We conclude that the tachyphylaxis to sumatriptan observed in the non-cerebral blood vessels, and not in the cerebral ones, may be due to loss of functionality of the 5-HT(1B) receptor subtype, increasing the safety of triptans.

[Myocardial infarction after taking zolmitriptan]

Zolmitriptan is a drug used in the acute treatment of migraine, which should not be used in high cardiovascular risk individuals because of its potential to induce vasospasm. We report a rare case of myocardial infarction precipitated by taking zolmitriptan.

New approaches to the pharmacological treatment of obesity: can they break through the efficacy barrier?

In this review we assess the range of centrally active anorectics that are either in human clinical trials, or are likely to be so in the near future. We describe their weight loss efficacy, mode of action at both pharmacological and behavioural levels, where understood, together with the range of side effects that might be expected in clinical use. We have however evaluated these compounds against the considerably more rigorous criteria that are now being used by the Federal Drugs Agency and European Medicines Agency to decide approvals and market withdrawals. Several trends are evident. Recent advances in the understanding of energy balance control have resulted in the exploitation of a number of new targets, some of which have yielded promising data in clinical trials for weight loss. A second major trend is derived from the hypothesis that improved weight loss efficacy over current therapy is most likely to emerge from treatments targeting multiple mechanisms of energy balance control. This reasoning has led to the development of a number of new treatments for obesity where multiple mechanisms are targeted, either by a single molecule, such as tesofensine, or through drug combinations such as qnexa, contrave, empatic, and pramlintide+metreleptin. Many of these approaches also utilise advances in formulation technology to widen safety margins. Finally, the practicality of peptide therapies for obesity has become better validated in recent studies and this may allow more rapid exploitation of novel targets, rather than awaiting the development of orally available small molecules. We conclude that novel, more efficacious and better tolerated treatments for obesity may become available in the near future.

Triptans and troponin: a case report

This case report describes for the first time acute coronary syndrome in a 67-year old patient after oral intake of naratriptan for migraine. So far in the literature, only sumatriptan, zolmitriptan and frovatriptan have been described to cause acute coronary syndromes.

A 67-year old Swiss woman with thoracic pain after intake of 2.5 mg naratriptan presented with T-wave inversions in the ECG and a positive troponin-T at our hospital. Coronary angiography showed normal coronary arteries. Naratriptan-induced coronary vasospasms were thought to have caused the acute coronary syndrome.

Triptans should not be prescribed in patients with pre-existing coronary heart disease. However, triptans can also cause acute coronary syndromes in patients without coronary heart disease – as described in our case report. Severe or persistent thoracic pain after intake of triptans should therefore be investigated accordingly.

Treatment Choices and Patterns in Migraine Patients With and Without a Cardiovascular Risk Profile

Treatment patterns in migraine patients with cardiovascular risk factors are largely unknown. A retrospective observational study was conducted to characterize the baseline cardiovascular risk profile of new users of specific abortive migraine drugs, and to investigate treatment choices and patterns in patients with and without a known cardiovascular risk profile. New users of a triptan, ergotamine or Migrafin® ( n = 36 839) from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2006 were included. Approximately 90 of all new users did not have a clinically recognized cardiovascular risk profile. The percentage of new users with a cardiovascular risk profile did not differ between new users of a triptan, ergotamine or Migrafin® and also did not change during the study period of 17 years. Differences in treatment choices and patterns between migraine patients with and without a known cardiovascular risk profile reveal a certain reticence in prescribing vasoconstrictive antimigraine drugs to patients at cardiovascular risk.

Characterization of the human basilar artery contractile response to 5-HT and triptans

To study the contractile responses of the human basilar artery to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), sumatriptan, zolmitriptan and naratriptan, and to characterize the 5-HT receptor subtypes involved on those responses, human basilar artery rings were prepared for isometric contraction, protein isolation and Western blotting analysis. Concentration-response (CR) curves were made for all agonists in the absence or in the presence of selective antagonists at 5-HT1B (cyanopindolol), 5-HT1D (BRL 15,572) and 5-HT2 (ketanserin) receptors. We also used anti-5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptor antibodies to search for the expression of protein of these receptor subtypes. From the CR curves, the relative intrinsic activity and potency of these agonists were determined. The ranking order for the intrinsic activity was 5-HT > or = sumatriptan > zolmitriptan > or = naratriptan, whereas that for the potency was zolmitriptan > or = 5-HT > or = sumatriptan > naratriptan. Our results also show that the human basilar artery seems to have a mixed population of 5-HT1B/1D receptors mediating the contractile response to triptans, which is also suggested by the expression of both receptor subtypes. There is also a population of 5-HT2 receptors for which the antimigraine drugs used have no apparent affinity. From this study, one can conclude that the second generation triptans have lower contractile capacity than sumatriptan, suggesting that they have a better cerebrovascular safety profile.

Triptan use and risk of cardiovascular events: a nested-case-control study from the French health system database

BACKGROUND

The use of triptans (5-HT agonists) in the treatment of migraine is associated with a potential increasing risk of cardiovascular events and raises the question of the relationship between overuse and the occurrence of ischemic events.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the association between the intensity of triptan use and occurrence of an cardiac event.

METHODS

Using the reimbursed drug prescription database of the National French Health Insurance System in the Midi-Pyrenees area, we identified subjects receiving at least one triptan in the second semester of 2002. From this population, we selected new users and retrieved all reimbursed care data up to 31 December 2003. We estimated the patterns of triptan exposure by calculating the number of defined daily doses (DDD) received per 30-day period. Another reimbursed health care database was used to identify as cases of cardiac outcomes those patients receiving care for the management of a possible heart ischemic event. Each case was randomly matched on age and gender with four controls free of any cardiovascular event before the index date. A conditional logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between cardiac outcomes and exposure to triptans in the 30 days before the index date.

RESULTS

The cohort of new users of triptans included 8625 subjects, 4414 (51.18%) of whom received only one dispensation for triptans during the follow-up period (median duration: 427 days). For the remaining subjects, the peak of triptans delivery was </=8 DDD for 14.68% of the cohort, between 9 and 14 DDD for 22.17%, between 15 and 29 for 10.04% and >/=30 DDD for 1.92%. Fifty-seven users (0.66%) presented a cardiac history and 1388 patients (16.09%) had cardiovascular risk factors. We identified 155 incident cases of cardiac outcomes during the follow-up and compared these to 620 matched controls. Cases were older and presented more frequently with cardiac history or cardiovascular risk factors than the other users of triptans. The distribution exposure to triptans did not significantly differ between cases and controls with an odds ratio for an exposure </=8 DDD in the last 30 days of 0.74 [95% CI (0.31-1.77)] and that for an exposure >8 DDD equal to 1.14 [95% CI (0.58-2.27)].

CONCLUSION

The proportion of patients showing an overuse of triptans (more than 15 DDD for 30 days) reached 12% in this cohort of new users of triptans. However, we did not find any relationship between the overuse of triptans and cardiac outcomes. This study also shows that some patients with cardiovascular risk factors are actually treated by triptans. These patients are more likely to present a cardiac outcome potentially related to an ischemic event after the introduction of triptan.

Sumatriptan provokes coronary artery spasm in patients with variant angina: Possible involvement of serotonin 1B receptor

BACKGROUND

Serotonin (5HT) can induce coronary artery spasm (CAS) in patients with variant angina (VA). We have previously reported that 5HT(1B) and 5HT(2A) receptors gene were expressed in human coronary arterial smooth muscle cells and that isolated coronary artery from a patient with VA showed the supersensitivity to sumatriptan (SMT), a 5HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist. The aim of the present study was to determine whether SMT can provoke CAS directly or indirectly through platelet aggregation in patients with VA.

METHODS

We evaluated the effects of intracoronary infusion of graded concentrations of SMT on coronary arteries in 9 patients, including 5 documented VA and 4 participants with atypical chest pain as control.

RESULTS

SMT provoked CAS in all patients with VA. SMT could not induce CAS in control. SMT (10(-4) M) caused significant contractions (%diameter of baseline; median [interquartile range], 0 [0-18.4]% in VA, as compared with control (proximal segments; 92.6 [77.9-118.9]%, p<0.05 vs. VA, distal segments; 92.9 [65.3-158.5]%, p<0.01 vs. VA). In control, minor dilation occurred at SMT concentration up to 10(-5) M. SMT could induce in vitro platelet aggregation neither in healthy subjects nor in patients with VA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that activation of 5HT(1B) receptor by SMT can induce CAS directly in patients with VA without platelet activation. This is the first report directly demonstrating the effect of 5HT(1B) receptor activation on human coronary arteries in vivo.

5-Hydroxytryptamine receptors in the human cardiovascular system

The human cardiovascular system is exposed to plasma 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), usually released from platelets. 5-HT can produce harmful acute and chronic effects. The acute cardiac effects of 5-HT consist of tachycardia (preceded on occasion by a brief reflex bradycardia), increased atrial contractility and production of atrial arrhythmias. Acute inotropic, lusitropic and arrhythmic effects of 5-HT on human ventricle become conspicuous after inhibition of phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity. Human cardiostimulation is mediated through 5-HT4 receptors. Atrial and ventricular PDE3 activity exerts a protective role against potentially harmful cardiostimulation. Chronic exposure to high levels of 5-HT (from metastatic carcinoid tumours), the anorectic drug fenfluramine and its metabolites, as well as the ecstasy drug 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its metabolite 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) are associated with proliferative disease and thickening of cardiac valves, mediated through 5-HT2B receptors. 5-HT2B receptors have an obligatory physiological role in murine cardiac embryology but whether this happens in humans requires research. Congenital heart block (CHB) is, on occasion, associated with autoantibodies against 5-HT4 receptors. Acute vascular constriction by 5-HT is usually shared by 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A receptors, except in intracranial arteries which constrict only through 5-HT1B receptors. Both 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A receptors can mediate coronary artery spasm but only 5-HT1B receptors appear involved in coronary spasm of patients treated with triptans or with Prinzmetal angina. 5-HT2A receptors constrict the portal venous system including oesophageal collaterals in cirrhosis. Chronic exposure to 5-HT can contribute to pulmonary hypertension through activation of constrictor 5-HT1B receptors and proliferative 5-HT2B receptors, and possibly through direct intracellular effects.

Intense Vasoconstriction in Response to Aspirate From Stented Saphenous Vein Aortocoronary Bypass Grafts

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify soluble vasoconstrictor substances that are released during stent implantation into saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts.

BACKGROUND

Atherosclerotic saphenous vein aortocoronary bypass grafts are particularly vulnerable to plaque rupture. Protection devices prevent particulate debris from being embolized. Additional soluble vasoconstrictor substances possibly also contribute to impaired microvascular perfusion.

METHODS

Peripheral venous blood (VB) and aspirate (AS) were obtained from 14 patients with a significant stenosis in a saphenous vein graft during stent implantation under protection with a distal balloon occlusion device. In five additional patients, arterial blood (AB) was also taken distal to the stented lesion before intervention. Vasomotor substances in VB, AB, and AS plasma were identified in a bioassay of rat mesenteric arteries with intact (+E) and denuded endothelium (-E). Vasoconstriction was normalized to that induced by potassium chloride depolarization (100%).

RESULTS

Venous blood, AB, and AS plasma induced maximum vasoconstriction within six minutes. The AS plasma induced a vasoconstriction of 138 +/- 13% (-E) and 87 +/- 14% (+E); VB, of 70 +/- 14% (-E) and 23 +/- 4% (+E); and AB plasma obtained before intervention, of 49 +/- 9% (-E) and 36 +/- 8% (+E). The vasoconstrictor potency of AS plasma in endothelium-denuded vessels was related to the severity of anginal symptoms, angiographic stenosis severity, plaque volume, and plaque burden as determined by intravascular ultrasound. The AS plasma-induced vasoconstriction was largely attenuated by combined serotonin/5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(2A/2C)- and 5-HT(1A/1B)-receptor blockade and eliminated by additional thromboxane A2 thromboxane-prostanoid (TP)-receptor blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

Stent implantation releases, apart from and in addition to particulate debris, soluble vasoconstrictor substances that possibly contribute to impaired microvascular perfusion.

Effects of sumatriptan and eletriptan on diseased epicardial coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

Triptans are contraindicated in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD); however, few studies have evaluated triptans in patients with obstructive CAD to quantify the vasoconstrictive effect on diseased coronary vessels.

METHODS

Patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for symptomatic single-vessel CAD were randomised to one of three parallel cohorts to receive (1) 6 mg intravenously (IV) infused eletriptan plus subcutaneous (SC) placebo, (2) IV infused placebo plus 6 mg SC sumatriptan or (3) IV infused placebo plus SC placebo, as simultaneous administrations in a double-blind manner. Serial arteriograms, hemodynamic indices, electrocardiography and triptan plasma concentrations were obtained.

RESULTS

. Fifteen minutes after triptan challenge, median (95% confidence interval) changes in coronary artery diameter (CADM) at the focal point of the stenosed segment were: dilation of 2.6% (-5.0, 11.4), eletriptan 6 mg IV (n = 18); constriction of 6.8% (-12.6, 0.4), sumatriptan 6 mg SC (n = 17), and constriction of 4.5% (-7.0, 7.9), placebo (n = 10). One patient had angiographic evidence of a new thrombus at the stenosis site, necessitating termination of study infusion and successful stenting of the lesion. There was no correlation between effects on CADM and triptan concentration, or between hemodynamic or electrocardiograph changes and the presence (n = 13) or absence (n = 33) of chest pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Triptans had very little effect on diseased epicardial coronary arteries in a small group of angina sufferers with established CAD. Results should be interpreted cautiously since there may be instances where even modest triptan-associated epicardial constriction is sufficient to precipitate myocardial ischemia in patients with severe obstructive CAD.

A case of myocardial infarction with sumatriptan use

Sumatriptan is widely used in the treatment of acute attacks of cluster headache. It is a serotonin-1 (5HT-1) agonist. Several studies have reported an association between sumatriptan use and myocardial infarction, possibly due to the generalized vasoconstrictive nature of this agent. We report a 16-year-old male patient presenting with acute inferior myocardial infarction after sumatriptan use without any known risk factors of coronary artery disease.

Evaluating the safety and tolerability profile of acute treatments for migraine

Among the medications that have been used as acute treatments for migraine are nonspecific agents, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), analgesics (either single or combination), and narcotics, as well as migraine-specific medications, including ergot alkaloids and triptans (5-hydroxytryptamine 1B/1D agonists). All of these drugs have side effects that vary in type and severity. Side effects of nonspecific medications, including gastrointestinal (GI) and renal effects with NSAIDs and cognitive effects and the potential for abuse with narcotics and butalbital-containing medications, have been documented over time, as these medications have been used for various indications. Side effects of the migraine-specific medications include GI and vascular symptoms with the ergots; for the triptans, they include chest and neurologic symptoms. Although adverse events are reported fairly frequently in patients receiving triptans, they are usually mild, and few patients discontinue therapy because of them. The most serious adverse events are cardiovascular. Because of potential vasoconstrictor effects--mild and transient increases in blood pressure and mild and transient effects on coronary artery tone--triptans as a class are contraindicated in patients with established or clinically suspected cardiovascular disease, specifically ischemic heart disease and uncontrolled hypertension. Other adverse events, including the potential for drug-drug interactions, are less common. Therefore, consideration should be given to the tolerability and safety of medications before their use as abortive medications for the treatment of migraine headache.

Drug-induced atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained rhythm disorder observed in clinical practice and predominantly associated with cardiovascular disorders such as coronary heart disease and hypertension. However, several classes of drugs may induce AF in patients without apparent heart disease or may precipitate the onset of AF in patients with preexisting heart disease. We reviewed the literature on drug-induced AF, using the PubMed/Medline and Micromedex databases and lateral references. Successively, we discuss the potential role in the onset of AF of cardiovascular drugs, respiratory system drugs, cytostatics, central nervous system drugs, genitourinary system drugs, and some miscellaneous agents. Drug-induced AF may play a role in only a minority of the patients presenting with AF. Nevertheless, it is important to recognize drugs or other agents as a potential cause, especially in the elderly, because increasing age is associated with multiple drug use and a high incidence of AF. This may contribute to timely diagnosis and management of drug-induced AF.

Oral Sumatriptan‐Induced Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Sumatriptan has been used in the treatment of migraine and other vascular headaches since 1993 in the United States. Its side effects include chest pains in 3% to 8% of patients who have known cardiac risk factors. This is a case report of a 45-year-old woman with no history of cardiac risk factors who had a myocardial infarction after her monthly dose of oral sumatriptan.

METHODS

The patient was examined in the emergency room, evaluated by electrocardiography, and serial evaluations of cardiac enzymes over the next 24 h. She was admitted to the cardiology ward. A cardiac catherization and additional laboratory studies were performed the following day.

RESULTS

The catherization revealed normal heart function, but a 60% to 70% non-flowing stenosis within the first septal perforator. Laboratory indices for cardiac risk were within normal ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients without cardiac risk factors may experience myocardial infarction following an oral dose of sumatriptan.

Tegaserod-induced myocardial infarction: case report and hypothesis

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT])1 receptor agonists, such as those used for treating migraine, can cause coronary artery contraction, coronary spasm, and even myocardial infarction. Tegaserod maleate is a relatively new 5-HT4 receptor agonist with moderate affinity for the 5-HT1 receptor. Currently, it is approved only for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome in women who have constipation as the primary symptom. However, it is also being administered as a promotility agent in patients with gastroparesis. Since tegaserod has affinity for the 5-HT1 receptor, it is plausible that tegaserod could cause the same types of cardiovascular adverse events seen with agents prescribed for management of migraine. We report the first case of a man who experienced a myocardial infarction after receiving only two 6-mg doses of tegaserod; we also provide a hypothesis regarding this event. When considering prescribing a drug with 5-HT1 receptor agonist activity, clinicians should review the patient's medical history specifically for the presence of underlying cardiovascular risk factors.

Cardiovascular tolerability and safety of triptans: a review of clinical data

Triptans are not widely used in clinical practice despite their well-established efficacy, endorsement by the US Headache Consortium, and the demonstrable need to employ effective intervention to reduce migraine-associated disability. Although the relatively restricted use of triptans may be attributed to several factors, research suggests that prescribers' concerns about cardiovascular safety prominently figure in limiting their use. This article reviews clinical data--including results of clinical trials, postmarketing studies and surveillance, and pharmacodynamic studies--relevant to assessing the cardiovascular safety profile of the triptans. These data demonstrate that triptans are generally well tolerated. Chest symptoms occurring during use of triptans are usually nonserious and usually not attributed to ischemia. Incidence of triptan-associated serious cardiovascular adverse events in both clinical trials and clinical practice appears to be extremely low. When they do occur, serious cardiovascular events have most often been reported in patients at significant cardiovascular risk or in those with overt cardiovascular disease. Adverse cardiovascular events also have occurred, however, in patients without evidence of cardiovascular disease. Several lines of evidence suggest that nonischemic mechanisms are responsible for sumatriptan-associated chest symptoms, although the mechanism of chest symptoms has not been determined to date. Importantly, most of the clinical trials and clinical practice data on triptans are derived from patients without known cardiovascular disease. Therefore, the conclusions of this review cannot be extended to patients with cardiovascular disease. The cardiovascular safety profile of triptans favors their use in the absence of contraindications.

Triptan use preceding life-threatening arrhythmias in charcot-marie-tooth: a case report and review of the literature

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) identifies a rare group of inherited disorders of the peripheral nervous system that share clinical features of sensory and motor defects, but rarely affect cardiac function. The few references that relate CMT to cardiac pathology of any sort are so rare that their finding was considered either fortuitous or suggestive of an erroneous diagnosis. The 5-HT1B/1D agonists or triptan drug class was introduced to the clinical practice arena in the early 1990s, and since then several cardiac adverse events have been associated with its use. The authors report the case of a 41-year-old white woman with CMT who had been recently prescribed sumatriptan and who presented with sudden loss of consciousness associated with ventricular fibrillation. These findings have been reported in the literature, but the association of triptan-induced arrhythmias and degenerative neuropathies remains to be established. The authors propose, through this case report and review, that the relative rarity of CMT coupled with the lack of further investigation of their association with conduction abnormalities might have set the stage for underestimation of the potentially synergistic effect with triptans in their capacity to generate life-threatening arrhythmias.

Migraine and coronary heart disease in women and men

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated migraine as an independent risk factor for subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD) events among women in the Women's Health Study (WHS) and men in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS).

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have suggested that migraine is associated with increased risk of stroke, there are few and conflicting data on whether migraine predicts risk of future CHD events.

METHODS

The WHS is an ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low-dose aspirin and vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer in 39876 women health professionals aged > or =45 years in 1993, and the PHS is a completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of aspirin and beta-carotene in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer in 22071 men physicians aged 40 to 84 years in 1982. Primary endpoints were defined as major CHD (nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI] or fatal CHD) and total CHD (major CHD plus angina and coronary revascularization).

RESULTS

After adjusting for other CHD risk factors, female health professionals and male physicians reporting migraine were not at increased risk for subsequent major CHD (women: relative risk [RR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 1.29; men: RR, 1.02; 95% Cl, 0.79 to 1.31) or total CHD (women: RR, 1.01; 95% Cl, 0.76 to 1.34; men: RR, 0.98; 95% Cl, 0.82 to 1.18). When considered separately, there was also no increase in risk of MI or angina.

CONCLUSION

These prospective data suggest that migraine is not associated with increased risk of subsequent CHD events in women or men.

Cluster headache: aetiology, diagnosis and management

Cluster headache is characterised by repeated attacks of strictly unilateral pain in the orbital region associated with local autonomic symptoms or signs. The attacks are brief but of a very severe, almost excruciating intensity. For unknown reasons males are affected more often than females. Recent studies suggest that an autosomal dominant gene has a role in some families with cluster headache. Hormonal studies indicate a dysfunction in the central nervous system. Neuroimaging has revealed primary defects in the hypothalamic grey matter. Local homolateral dilatation in the intracranial segment of the internal carotid and ophthalmic arteries during attacks is the result of a generic neurovascular activation, probably mediated by trigeminal parasympathetic reflexes. Sumatriptan 6mg subcutaneously is the drug of choice in the treatment of acute attacks. Inhalation of 100% oxygen can also be recommended. In the prophylactic treatment, verapamil is the first option. Other drugs that can be considered are corticosteroids, which may induce a remission of frequent, severe attacks, and lithium. Oral ergotamine tartrate may be sufficient for patients with night attacks and/or short, rather mild to moderately severe cluster headache periods. Third line drugs are serotonin inhibitors (methysergide and pizotifen) and valproic acid. Patients should be encouraged to keep headache diaries and be carefully instructed about the nature and treatment of the headaches. Alcohol can bring on extra attacks and should not be consumed during active periods of cluster headache.

Frovatriptan for the acute treatment of migraine: a dose-finding study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the optimal dose and tolerability of frovatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine.

BACKGROUND

Frovatriptan has a distinctive pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profile compared with sumatriptan. A previous study has shown that frovatriptan doses of 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg are equally effective in relieving headache with no evidence of a dose-response relationship. The incidence of adverse events tended to increase with doses of 10 mg and above.

METHODS

This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter trial. Patients (n=635) took a single oral dose of placebo or frovatriptan, 0.5, 1, 2.5, or 5 mg, at the onset of a moderate or severe migraine headache and recorded headache intensity, functional impairment, and migraine-associated symptoms over 24 hours.

RESULTS

Frovatriptan 2.5 mg produced clinically and statistically significant headache relief 2 hours post-dose, whereas the effect of lower doses was not significantly different from that of placebo at that time point. The 2.5-mg dose also produced significant symptom relief and improvement in functional impairment. All doses of frovatriptan were well tolerated, and the majority of adverse events were of mild or moderate severity.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that the 2.5-mg dose of frovatriptan offers optimal efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of acute migraine. Higher doses do not appear to confer greater efficacy and are associated with an increased incidence of adverse effects.

Advances in pharmacological treatment of migraine

Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder with attacks of headache, nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia and malaise. This review summarises new treatment options both for the therapy of the acute attack as well as for migraine prophylaxis. Analgesics like aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective in treating migraine attacks. Few controlled trials were performed for the use of ergotamine or dihydroergotamine. These trials indicate inferior efficacy compared with serotonin (5-HT(1B/D)) agonists (triptans). The triptans (almotriptan, eletriptan, frovatriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan, sumatriptan and zolmitriptan), are highly effective. They improve headache as well as nausea, photo- and phonophobia. The different triptans show only minor differences in efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse effects. The knowledge of their different pharmacological profile allows a more specific treatment of the individual migraine characteristics. Migraine prophylaxis is recommended, when more than three attacks occur per month, if attacks do not respond to acute treatment or if side effects of acute treatment are severe. Substances with proven efficacy include the beta-blockers metoprolol and propranolol, the calcium channel blocker flunarizine, several 5-HT antagonists and amitriptyline. Recently anti-epileptic drugs (valproic acid, gabapentin, topiramate) were evaluated for the prophylaxis of migraine. The use of botulinum toxin is under investigation.

Imidazoline-modified benzylimidazolines as h5-HT(1D/1B) serotonergic ligands

Sumatriptan, a h5-HT1D and h5-HT1B receptor agonist used clinically as a migraine-abortive, produces certain side effects thought to result from its affinity for h5-HT1B receptors. The present investigation extends our work with benzylimidazolines as novel non-tryptamine h5-HT(1D/1B) ligands. The effect of N-methylation, N-benzylation, ring-aromatization, and variation of the imidazoline ring on affinity both at h5-HT1D and h5-HT1B receptors was examined. Several compounds were identified with good affinity and enhanced (i.e., > 100-fold) h5-HT1D versus hS-HT1B selectivity.

Pharmacological properties of the naturally occurring Phe-124-Cys variant of the human 5-HT1B receptor: changes in ligand binding, G-protein coupling and second messenger formation

The aim of this study was to analyse whether substitution of phenylalanine in position 124 of the human (h) 5-HT1B receptor by cysteine, a naturally occurring variant of this receptor, modifies not only ligand binding, but also G-protein coupling and second messenger formation. Stably transfected rat C6 glioma cells, which express either the h5-HT1B variant receptor (VR) or the wild-type receptor (WTR) were used. In saturation experiments with [3H]5-carboxamidotryptamine ([3H]5-CT), the maximum binding (Bmax) of the VR amounted to only 60% of that to WTR. In competition experiments with 1 nM [3H]5-CT, the following 5-HT receptor ligands exhibited a higher affinity for the mutant receptor than for the WTR: L-694,247, 5-CT, 5-HT, sumatriptan (agonists listed at decreasing order of potency) and SB-224289 (a selective h5-HT1B receptor inverse agonist with competitive antagonistic properties). In contrast, the mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR-127935 exhibited equal affinity for both isoforms. The efficacy of L-694,247, 5-CT, 5-HT and sumatriptan in stimulating [35S]GTPgammaS binding (a measure of G protein coupling) to membranes of cells expressing the VR was approximately 50-65% lower compared to membranes of cells expressing the WTR, but their potency was 2.8-3.6-fold higher. SB-224289, which decreased [35S]GTPgammaS binding when given alone, but not GR-127935, was more potent in antagonizing the stimulatory effect of 5-CT on [35S]GTPgammaS binding to membranes expressing the VR compared to membranes expressing the WTR. In whole cells expressing the VR, 5-CT and sumatriptan inhibited the forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation 3.2-fold more potently than in cells expressing the WTR. In conclusion, our data suggest that the Phe-124-Cys mutation modifies the pharmacological properties of the h5-HT1B receptor and may account for pharmacogenetic differences in the action of h5-HT1B receptor ligands. Thus, the sumatriptan-induced vasospasm which occurs at low incidence as a side-effect in migraine therapy may be related to the expression of the (124-Cys)h5-HT1B receptor in patients with additional pathogenetic factors such as coronary heart disease.

The potential anti-migraine compound SB-220453 does not contract human isolated blood vessels or myocardium; a comparison with sumatriptan

The mechanistically novel benzopyran derivative SB-220453, which is undergoing clinical evaluation in migraine, exhibits a high affinity for a selective, but not yet characterized, binding site in the human brain. It inhibits nitric oxide release and cerebral vasodilatation following cortical spreading depression as well as carotid vasodilatation induced by trigeminal nerve stimulation in the cat. The aim of our study was to investigate the contractile properties of SB-220453 on a number of human isolated blood vessels (coronary artery, saphenous vein and middle meningeal artery) as well as atrial and ventricular cardiac trabeculae. While sumatriptan induced marked contractions in three blood vessels investigated, SB-220453 was devoid of any effect. In atrial and ventricular cardiac trabeculae, neither SB-220453 nor sumatriptan displayed a positive or negative inotropic effect. Since SB-220453 did not contract the middle meningeal artery, we conclude that potential anti-migraine effects are not mediated via a direct cerebral vasoconstriction. The lack of activity of SB-220453 in coronary artery, saphenous vein and cardiac trabeculae demonstrates that the compound is unlikely to cause adverse cardiac side-effects.