Complement enhancement of HIV infection is mediated by complement receptors

Blocking of integrins inhibits HIV-1 infection of human cervical mucosa immune cells with free and complement-opsonized virions

The initial interaction between HIV-1 and the host occurs at the mucosa during sexual intercourse. In cervical mucosa, HIV-1 exists both as free and opsonized virions and this might influence initial infection. We used cervical explants to study HIV-1 transmission, the effects of opsonization on infectivity, and how infection can be prevented. Complement opsonization enhanced HIV-1 infection of dendritic cells (DCs) compared with that by free HIV-1, but this increased infection was not observed with CD4(+) T cells. Blockage of the α4-, β7-, and β1-integrins significantly inhibited HIV-1 infection of both DCs and CD4(+) T cells. We found a greater impairment of HIV-1 infection in DCs for complement-opsonized virions compared with that of free virions when αM/β2- and α4-integrins were blocked. Blocking the C-type lectin receptor macrophage mannose receptor (MMR) inhibited infection of emigrating DCs but had no effect on CD4(+) T-cell infection. We show that blocking of integrins decreases the HIV-1 infection of both mucosal DCs and CD4(+) T cells emigrating from the cervical tissues. These findings may provide the basis of novel microbicidal strategies that may help limit or prevent initial infection of the cervical mucosa, thereby reducing or averting systemic HIV-1 infection.

Complement opsonization of HIV-1 enhances the uptake by dendritic cells and involves the endocytic lectin and integrin receptor families

Interaction with the complement system is an underappreciated aspect of HIV-1 infection; even in primary infection, complement fragments are found on virions with potential to affect the interplay between the virus and dendritic cells (DC). Since opsonization may affect the efficiency of uptake and the type of receptors utilized, we compared the interactions of DC with free HIV-1 (F-HIV) and complement opsonized HIV-1 (C-HIV). We demonstrate that C-HIV significantly enhanced the uptake by immature DC (IDC) and mature DC (MDC) and that the internalization rate was dependent on both opsonization of the virus and DC maturation state. Increased DC uptake of C-HIV was not due to opsonization related increased binding of virus to the surface of DC but rather increased internalization of C-HIV despite utilizing a similar repertoire of receptors as F-HIV. Both F-HIV and C-HIV interacted with C-type lectins, integrins, and CD4 and blocking these receptor families prevented HIV-1 from binding to DC at 4°C. Blocking integrins significantly reduced the binding and uptake of F-HIV and C-HIV implicating the involvement of several integrins such as β1-integrin, CR3, LFA-1, and α4β7. Distinctive for C-HIV was usage of β1-integrin and for F-HIV, usage of β7-integrin, whereas both F-HIV and C-HIV utilized both integrin chains of CR3. We have in this study identified the receptor types used by both F-HIV and C-HIV to bind to DC. Noteworthy, C-HIV was internalized more efficiently by DC than F-HIV, probably via receptor mediated endocytosis, which may entail different intracellular processing of the virus leading to both elevated infection and altered activation of HIV specific immune responses.

Differential activity of candidate microbicides against early steps of HIV-1 infection upon complement virus opsonization

Background

HIV-1 in genital secretions may be opsonized by several molecules including complement components. Opsonized HIV-1 by complement enhances the infection of various mucosal target cells, such as dendritic cells (DC) and epithelial cells.

Results

We herein evaluated the effect of HIV-1 complement opsonization on microbicide candidates' activity, by using three in vitro mucosal models: CCR5-tropic HIV-1_JR-CSF transcytosis through epithelial cells, HIV-1_JR-CSF attachment on immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (iMDDC), and infectivity of iMDDC by CCR5-tropic HIV-1_BaL and CXCR4-tropic HIV-1_NDK. A panel of 10 microbicide candidates [T20, CADA, lectines HHA & GNA, PVAS, human lactoferrin, and monoclonal antibodies IgG1B12, 12G5, 2G12 and 2F5], were investigated using cell-free unopsonized or opsonized HIV-1 by complements. Only HHA and PVAS were able to inhibit HIV trancytosis. Upon opsonization, transcytosis was affected only by HHA, HIV-1 adsorption on iMDDC by four molecules (lactoferrin, IgG1B12, IgG2G5, IgG2G12), and replication in iMDDC of HIV-1_BaL by five molecules (lactoferrin, CADA, T20, IgG1B12, IgG2F5) and of HIV-1_NDK by two molecules (lactoferrin, IgG12G5).

Conclusion

These observations demonstrate that HIV-1 opsonization by complements may modulate in vitro the efficiency of candidate microbicides to inhibit HIV-1 infection of mucosal target cells, as well as its crossing through mucosa.

Opsonization of HIV-1 by semen complement enhances infection of human epithelial cells

In the present study we demonstrate that both X4- and R5-tropic HIV-1 strains are able to infect the human epithelial cell line HT-29. Infection was enhanced 2-fold when HIV was added to semen before contact with the cell cultures. The enhancing effect of semen was complement dependent, as evidenced by blockage of generation of C3a/C3a(desArg) in semen by heat or EDTA treatment of semen and suppression of semen-dependent enhancement with mAbs directed to complement receptor type 3 (CD11b/CD18) and soluble CD16. Infection of HT-29 cells was assessed by the release of p24 Ag in cultures and semiquantitative PCR of the HIV-1 pol gene. Inhibition of infection of HT-29 by stromal cell-derived factor 1 was decreased in the case of semen-opsonized X4- and R5-tropic virus compared with unopsonized virus. In contrast, inhibition of infection by RANTES was increased for opsonized X4-tropic HIV-1 compared with unopsonized virus. Taken together these observations indicate that activation of complement in semen may play an enhancing role in mucosal transmission of HIV-1 by facilitating infection of epithelial cells and/or enhancing infection of complement receptor-expressing target cells in the mucosa.

Complement-mediated enhancement of HIV-1 infection in peripheral blood mononuclear cells

We investigated if complement-mediated enhancement of HIV infection occurs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). In 7 experiments, we evaluated the effect of human complement on HIVIIIB infection in vitro. We measured HIV antigen production on day 4 and found that pre-incubation of HIV with complement led to enhanced production of antigen with a median enhancement of 2.5-fold (range 1.1-6.8). This complement-mediated increase in antigen production was statistically significant (p < 0.02). Complement-mediated enhancement of HIV infection was also tested in CD4 cells enriched from PBMC, and CD4 cells persistently gave higher levels of infection enhancement than PBMC. Thus, CD4 cells appear to be sufficient for complement-mediated enhancement of HIV infection to occur. In addition, we tested if it was possible to detect complement-mediated enhancement of primary HIV isolates in PBMC. We tested 3 isolates and found only a minor effect on antigen production (median enhancement 1.2-fold, range 0.6-1.5). Furthermore, addition of HIV-specific antibodies in combination with complement resulted in enhanced antigen production in 2/3 sera tested. However, the combination of complement and antibodies resulted in only a minor increase in enhancement of HIV infection compared to that obtained with complement alone. Finally, we found evidence of complement-mediated enhancement of HIV infection in resting PBMC. In conclusion, we demonstrated that complement-mediated enhancement of HIV infection does occur in vitro in PBMC.

Complement and immunity to viruses

Complement is one of the first lines of host defence to be faced and countered by viruses as they struggle to establish an infection. As an important arm of the humoral immune response, the complement system is immediately ready to target and eliminate virus particles and to interact with the surface of virus-infected cells to mark them for destruction by other branches of the immune response. Nevertheless, some viruses are still very successful human pathogens. This article will discuss the role of complement in antiviral immunity, the mechanisms by which complement may be activated by viruses or virus-infected cells, and explore some of the strategies which viruses have evolved to subvert the immune response, including mechanisms by which complement activation may be prevented or aborted.

Increased adhesion as a mechanism of antibody-dependent and antibody-independent complement-mediated enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus infection

Enhancement of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection by complement alone or in conjunction with antibodies was studied experimentally and theoretically. Experimental studies showed that while HIV-positive sera neutralize HIV infection, the addition of fresh complement abrogated neutralization and could even cause enhancement. Enhancement was blocked by anti-complement receptor 2 antibodies, and infection under enhancing conditions could be blocked by soluble CD4. Antibody-dependent complement-mediated enhancement (C'ADE) was dependent on the alternative complement activation pathway, as factor B-deficient serum could enhance only after the addition of factor B. The observed enhancement was also antibody dependent, since the addition of antibodies increased the level of enhancement. Under C'ADE conditions, infection reached a plateau within 5 min and was not caused by activation of cells by factors in the human serum. On the contrary, preincubation of cells with complement decreased the level of enhancement. A theoretical model of HIV infection in vitro which exhibited similar enhancement in an antibody- and complement concentration-dependent way was developed. Model studies indicated that the enhanced infection process could be explained by the fact that virions, because of complement deposition on the surface, bind more efficiently to cells. The model also indicated that the saturation of the enhanced infection process seen after a few minutes could be caused by saturation of the complement receptors. The effect of neutralizing antibodies can thus be overcome by the enhancing effect of complement that facilitates the contact between gp120 and CD4. These studies demonstrate that the main features of the complement-dependent enhancement phenomenon can be understood in terms of a simple mathematical model.