Photofrin II induces cytokine secretion by mouse spleen cells and human peripheral mononuclear cells

Photoimmunotherapy of Ovarian Cancer: A Unique Niche in the Management of Advanced Disease

Ovarian cancer (OvCa) is the leading cause of gynecological cancer-related deaths in the United States, with five-year survival rates of 15-20% for stage III cancers and 5% for stage IV cancers. The standard of care for advanced OvCa involves surgical debulking of disseminated disease in the peritoneum followed by chemotherapy. Despite advances in treatment efficacy, the prognosis for advanced stage OvCa patients remains poor and the emergence of chemoresistant disease localized to the peritoneum is the primary cause of death. Therefore, a complementary modality that is agnostic to typical chemo- and radio-resistance mechanisms is urgently needed. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a photochemistry-based process, is an ideal complement to standard treatments for residual disease. The confinement of the disease in the peritoneal cavity makes it amenable for regionally localized treatment with PDT. PDT involves photochemical generation of cytotoxic reactive molecular species (RMS) by non-toxic photosensitizers (PSs) following exposure to non-harmful visible light, leading to localized cell death. However, due to the complex topology of sensitive organs in the peritoneum, diffuse intra-abdominal PDT induces dose-limiting toxicities due to non-selective accumulation of PSs in both healthy and diseased tissue. In an effort to achieve selective damage to tumorous nodules, targeted PS formulations have shown promise to make PDT a feasible treatment modality in this setting. This targeted strategy involves chemical conjugation of PSs to antibodies, referred to as photoimmunoconjugates (PICs), to target OvCa specific molecular markers leading to enhanced therapeutic outcomes while reducing off-target toxicity. In light of promising results of pilot clinical studies and recent preclinical advances, this review provides the rationale and methodologies for PIC-based PDT, or photo-immunotherapy (PIT), in the context of OvCa management.

Photodynamic therapy using chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine decreases inflammatory response in an experimental rat periodontal disease model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Emerging evidence suggests that photodynamic therapy (PDT) can exhibit immunomodulatory activity. The purpose of the present study was to analyse cytokine profiles after application of PDT in gingival tissues of rats with ligature-induced periodontal disease (PD).

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIAL AND METHODS

Periodontal disease was induced through the introduction of a cotton thread around the first left mandibular molar, while the right side molars did not receive ligatures. After 7days of PD evolution, ligatures were removed from the left side, and the animals were randomically divided into the following treatment groups: I, rats without treatment; II, rats received chloro-aluminum phthalocyanine (AlClPc); III, rats received low-level laser alone; and IV, rats received AlClPc associated with low-level laser (PDT). The animals were killed 7days after the treatments, and the mandibles were histologically processed to assess morphological and immunohistochemical profile, while gingival tissues were removed for quantification of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL-)1β and IL-10 expression (by ELISA).

RESULTS

Histomorphological analysis of periodontal tissues demonstrated that PDT-treated animals show tissue necrosis, as well as lower TNF- α expression, compared to ligatured animals treated with AlClPc alone.

CONCLUSIONS

It was concluded that PDT using AlClPc entrapped in a lipid nanoemulsion may be useful in therapies, because of immunomodulatory effects that decreased the inflammatory response and cause tissue destruction.

Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: part two-cellular signaling, cell metabolism and modes of cell death

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been known for over a hundred years, but is only now becoming widely used. Originally developed as a tumor therapy, some of its most successful applications are for non-malignant disease. In the second of a series of three reviews, we will discuss the mechanisms that operate in PDT on a cellular level. In Part I [Castano AP, Demidova TN, Hamblin MR. Mechanism in photodynamic therapy: part one-photosensitizers, photochemistry and cellular localization. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther 2004;1:279-93] it was shown that one of the most important factors governing the outcome of PDT, is how the photosensitizer (PS) interacts with cells in the target tissue or tumor, and the key aspect of this interaction is the subcellular localization of the PS. PS can localize in mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus and plasma membranes. An explosion of investigation and explorations in the field of cell biology have elucidated many of the pathways that mammalian cells undergo when PS are delivered in tissue culture and subsequently illuminated. There is an acute stress response leading to changes in calcium and lipid metabolism and production of cytokines and stress proteins. Enzymes particularly, protein kinases, are activated and transcription factors are expressed. Many of the cellular responses are centered on mitochondria. These effects frequently lead to induction of apoptosis either by the mitochondrial pathway involving caspases and release of cytochrome c, or by pathways involving ceramide or death receptors. However, under certain circumstances cells subjected to PDT die by necrosis. Although there have been many reports of DNA damage caused by PDT, this is not thought to be an important cell-death pathway. This mechanistic research is expected to lead to optimization of PDT as a tumor treatment, and to rational selection of combination therapies that include PDT as a component.

Topical ALA-PDT modifies neutrophils' chemiluminescence, lymphocytes' interleukin-1beta secretion and serum level of transforming growth factor beta1 in patients with nonmelanoma skin malignancies A clinical study

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been recognized as a noninvasive therapeutic approach for the effective treatment of tumors. It has been shown in studies conducted on malignant cell lines and various animal tumor models, that the interaction of photosensitizing substances with light leads to the release of cytotoxic substances and stimulates the immune response.

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to analyze the immune system response in patients undergoing photodynamic therapy due to basal cell carcinoma (BCC).

METHODS

Patients with skin malignancies have been treated by 10% delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) (Medac GmbH, Wedel, Germany) topically and light from a diode laser. Blood samples were obtained from each patient twice in the same day: before and 4h after photodynamic treatment procedure. In patients' serum the concentration of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1) was determined. Additionally the study has been conducted on lymphocytes and granulocytes from peripheral blood. In cell culture supernatants the concentration of interleukin 1beta (IL-1β), interleukin 2 (IL-2), interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), the percentile composition of patients' lymphocytes and the chemiluminescence of neutrophils have been measured.

RESULTS

We have observed a significant increase (p=0.015) in the intensity of the neutrophil chemiluminescence and significant diminution (p=0.006) of IL-1β concentration in supernatants. Similarly the serum level of TGF-β1 has been significantly decreased (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

It is very likely that human immune system activity is modified by topical ALA-PDT and may potentially contribute to its final outcome.

Histamine Is Released following Aminolevulinic Acid-Photodynamic Therapy of Human Skin and Mediates an Aminolevulinic Acid Dose-Related Immediate Inflammatory Response

Acute skin inflammation occurs following topical aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT), but its nature and mediation are ill defined. As we observed an urticarial response, a potential role for histamine was explored. In 13 healthy volunteers, we assessed the time course and dose-response of the acute cutaneous response(s) to ALA-PDT, the impact of H(1) antihistamine blockade, and measured dermal histamine release. An ALA dose series was iontophoresed into ventral forearm skin and exposed to red light. All participants exhibited an immediate urticarial response, both wheal and flare correlating with log ALA dose. Subsequently, a dose-related erythema developed at treatment sites by 3 hours and persisted at 24 hours. H(1) blockade with oral cetirizine doubled the median minimal urticating dose of ALA and reduced the slope of dose-response for wheal and flare, whereas at the highest ALA dose, mean wheal and flare areas reduced by 68 and 60%, respectively. In contrast, cetirizine did not influence the 24 hour minimal phototoxic dose or erythema dose-response. Histamine release after ALA-PDT mirrored the urticarial response, levels peaking within 30 minutes and returning to baseline by 24 hours. Thus, two discrete acute inflammatory responses to topical ALA-PDT occur in human skin; histamine mediates the immediate response, but does not appear involved in the delayed phototoxicity.

Mechanisms in photodynamic therapy: Part three-Photosensitizer pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, tumor localization and modes of tumor destruction

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been known for over a hundred years, but is only now becoming widely used. Originally developed as cancer therapy, some of its most successful applications are for non-malignant disease. The majority of mechanistic research into PDT, however, is still directed towards anti-cancer applications. In the final part of series of three reviews, we will cover the possible reasons for the well-known tumor localizing properties of photosensitizers (PS). When PS are injected into the bloodstream they bind to various serum proteins and this can affect their phamacokinetics and biodistribution. Different PS can have very different pharmacokinetics and this can directly affect the illumination parameters. Intravenously injected PS undergo a transition from being bound to serum proteins, then bound to endothelial cells, then bound to the adventitia of the vessels, then bound either to the extracellular matrix or to the cells within the tumor, and finally to being cleared from the tumor by lymphatics or blood vessels, and excreted either by the kidneys or the liver. The effect of PDT on the tumor largely depends at which stage of this continuous process light is delivered. The anti-tumor effects of PDT are divided into three main mechanisms. Powerful anti-vascular effects can lead to thrombosis and hemorrhage in tumor blood vessels that subsequently lead to tumor death via deprivation of oxygen and nutrients. Direct tumor cell death by apoptosis or necrosis can occur if the PS has been allowed to be taken up by tumor cells. Finally the acute inflammation and release of cytokines and stress response proteins induced in the tumor by PDT can lead to an influx of leukocytes that can both contribute to tumor destruction as well as to stimulate the immune system to recognize and destroy tumor cells even at distant locations.

Immunomodulatory aspects of photodynamic therapy

In its conventional form, photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a clinically effective technique with which to treat tumours accessible to visible light. PDT utilises light absorbing compounds which catalyse the generation of toxic oxygen species, to produce localised antitumour effects. It has become apparent over the past decade that PDT also exhibits immunomodulatory attributes. Experimental animals may possess heightened antitumour immunity after tumour ablation with PDT. In contrast, at sub-phototoxic levels of photosensitiser, in combination with whole body light irradiation, PDT lessened disease severity when applied in different models of autoimmunity. Although the behaviour of lymphocytes may be affected by treatment, the ability of PDT to down-regulate autoimmune processes appears to be related to its capacity to influence the immunostimulatory attributes of antigen presenting cells.

The immunological consequences of photodynamic treatment of cancer, a literature review

In this review we discuss the effect of photodynamic treatment (PDT) of solid tumors on the immune response. The effect on both the innate and adapted immune response is discussed. We have summarized the evidence that PDT causes or enhances an anti-tumor response. PDT is a local treatment in which the treated tumor remains in situ while the immune system is only locally affected and still functional in contrast with e.g. after systemic chemotherapy. We conclude that PDT of cancer is a way of in situ vaccination to induce a systemic antitumor response. In general, immune cells are found in the tumor stroma, separated from tumor cells by extracellular matrix and basal membrane-like structures. We hypothesize that PDT destroys the structure of a tumor, thereby enabling direct interaction between immune cells and tumor cells resulting in the systemic anti-tumor immune response.

Activation of the IL-10 gene promoter following photodynamic therapy of murine keratinocytes

Photodynamic therapy (PDT), an anticancer treatment modality, has recently been shown to be an effective treatment for several autoimmune disease models including antigen-induced arthritis. PDT was found to induce the expression of IL-10 messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein in the skin, and this expression has similar kinetics to the appearance of PDT-induced suppression of skin-mediated immune responses such as the contract hypersensitivity (CHS) response. Some aspects of the UVB-induced suppression of the immune response have been linked to the induction of IL-10. IL-10 has been shown to inhibit the development and activation of Th1 cells, which are critical for many cell-mediated immune responses, including CHS. We have examined the effect of PDT and UVB irradiation on the activity of the IL-10 gene promoter and on IL-10 mRNA stability using the murine keratinocyte line, PAM 212. In vitro PDT induces IL-10 mRNA and protein expression from PAM 212 cells, which can be correlated with an increase in AP-1 DNA binding activity and activation of the IL-10 gene promoter by PDT. Deletion of an AP-1 response element from the IL-10 gene promoter was shown to abrogate the PDT-induced promoter activity indicating that the AP-1 response element is critical to IL-10 induction by PDT. In addition, PDT results in an increase in IL-10 mRNA stability, which may also contribute to the increased IL-10 expression in PAM 212 cells following PDT. In vitro UVB irradiation also results in activation of the IL-10 promoter. However, in contrast to PDT, UVB-induced activation of the IL-10 promoter is not AP-1 dependent and did not increase IL-10 mRNA stability.

Photofrin increases murine spleen cell transferrin receptor expression and responsiveness to recombinant myeloid and erythroid growth factors

When given to normal male mice, the photochemotherapeutic agent Photofrin (porfimer sodium), a complex mixture of monomeric and oligomeric non-metallic porphyrins, significantly increased relative spleen weight, spleen cell numbers, DNA replication, levels of granulocyte-macrophage and erythroid progenitors and cellular responsiveness to different recombinant (r) myeloid growth factors. In contrast, monomeric hematoporphyrin had no effect on spleen weight, cellularity, erythroid progenitor levels or spleen cell cycle status. Photofrin significantly increased spleen cell expression of the receptor (CD71) for the iron transport protein transferrin by 72 h post-injection but did not affect levels of a receptor (CD25) for the T-cell growth factor interleukin-2 (IL-2) or spleen cell responsiveness to rIL-2. Further evidence of increased splenic erythropoietic activity in Photofrin-treated mice was provided by double color flow cytometric studies which indicated that the treatment elevated the number of nucleated spleen cells recognized by the erythroid lineage-specific monoclonal antibody TER-119. A majority of TER-119+ cells also expressed CD71 and the heat stable antigen, a marker of developing hematopoietic cells as well as mature erythrocytes. The capacity of Photofrin to stimulate murine hematopoietic activity appears to be a property not shared by other porphyrin photosensitizers.