T-maze and food reinforcement: an inexpensive drug discrimination procedure

Assessment of the interoceptive effects of alcohol in rats using short-term training procedures

In the present study, we sought to determine whether the interoceptive effects of alcohol (1 g/kg, IG) could be assessed using a Pavlovian discrimination method, in which the alcohol drug state sets the occasion for which an environmental stimulus (e.g., light) will be followed by a sucrose reward. This procedure takes advantage of a naturally occurring behavior (i.e., food-seeking) which can be trained rapidly prior to the initiation of discrimination training. Given that the interoceptive effects of alcohol are routinely assessed using operant drug discrimination methods, another group of rats was trained using standard two-lever operant drug discrimination procedures in an effort to compare the Pavlovian procedure to a known behavioral benchmark. The results from this work show that, in addition to operant discrimination procedures, a Pavlovian discrimination task can be used to evaluate the interoceptive effects of alcohol. In addition to the brief behavioral sucrose access training (3 days) required prior to the initiation of the Pavlovian discrimination, the alcohol discrimination was acquired relatively rapidly (i.e., 8 training sessions), shortening the overall duration of the experiment. These features of the Pavlovian procedure make it a valuable method by which to assess the interoceptive effects of alcohol if a short experimental time frame is required, such as assessing the interoceptive effects of alcohol during a brief developmental window (e.g., adolescence) or determining the effects of a pretreatment (i.e., chronic stress, chronic drug pretreatment) on the acquisition of the alcohol discrimination. As such, this initial characterization confirms the feasibility of using this Pavlovian discrimination training method as an additional tool by which to assess the interoceptive effects of alcohol, as there may be experimental situations that necessitate short term discrimination training.

Recognising nicotine: the neurobiological basis of nicotine discrimination

Drug discrimination methodology makes possible the objective, quantitative study of the perception of psychoactive drug effects in either human or animal subjects. Investigations of the nicotine discriminative stimulus complex have contributed to our present understanding of nicotine psychopharmacology by defining the origin of its effects at specific subtypes of nicotinic receptor and the role of diverse neurotransmitter systems as mediating and modulating mechanisms. The evidence strongly supports central sites as the origins of the nicotine stimulus, and these are likely to be located in the mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic neurons; the medial prefrontal cortex is primarily involved, with the Nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area of secondary importance, while another element of the complex stimulus may arise in the dorsal hippocampus. Additionally, it appears that interactions of nicotine with the dopamine, serotonin, cannabinoid and probably glutamate systems all contribute to the final perceived stimulus. The resemblance between the nicotine discriminative stimulus and those of the psychomotor stimulant drugs amphetamine and cocaine contributes to defining the nature of the addictive properties of nicotine. It is particularly interesting that acute and chronic exposure to caffeine produce quantitative and qualitative changes in the characteristics of the nicotine stimulus. Interactions of nicotine with caffeine and cannabinoids strengthen proposals that the use of one substance serves as a "gateway" in sequential shifts of the target substance for drug-seeking behaviour, with profound implications for the human use of the substances concerned. Drug discrimination is also an important standard technique used in assessments of the abuse liability of novel psychoactive compounds, with relevance to attempts to develop novel nicotinic agonists for use as cognitive enhancers.

Using drug-discrimination techniques to study the abuse-related effects of psychoactive drugs in rats

Drug-discrimination (DD) techniques can be used to study abuse-related effects by establishing the interoceptive effects of a training drug (e.g., cocaine) as a cue for performing a specific operant response (e.g., lever pressing reinforced by food). During training with this protocol, pressing one lever is reinforced when the training drug is injected before the start of the session, and responding on a second lever is reinforced when vehicle is injected before the session. Lever choice during test sessions can then be used as an indication of whether a novel drug has effects similar to the training drug, or whether a potential therapeutic alters the effects of the training drug. Although training can be lengthy (up to several months), the pharmacological specificity of DD procedures make them a perfect complement to other techniques used to study drug-abuse phenomena, such as intravenous self-administration and conditioned place-preference procedures.

Characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid as a means for unraveling the neurochemical basis of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid actions and its similarities to those of ethanol

The present paper reviews the drug discrimination studies, both from the literature and from this laboratory, conducted to investigate the pharmacological profile of the discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid. Collectively, the results of these studies suggest that: (1) the discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid are composed of different cues, each one being the effect of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid on a specific receptor system; (2) the proportion of each component cue varies as the training dose of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid is increased; (3) the gamma-aminobutyric acid B-mediated cue is a major ingredient of the mixed stimulus of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid, but it is more prominent at high training doses than at low training doses of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid; and (4) positive modulation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptor is a relevant part of the discriminative stimulus effects of low gamma-hydroxybutyric acid doses. Finally, data indicating symmetrical generalization between the discriminative stimulus effects of a specific range of doses of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid and those of ethanol are discussed in regard to their further support of the hypothesis that gamma-hydroxybutyric acid may exert its antialcohol effects through a substitution mechanism.

Contribution of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors to the discriminative stimulus produced by gamma-hydroxybutyric acid

The present study examined the involvement of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors in the discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB). Rats were trained to discriminate either 300 or 700 mg/kg GHB IG from water using a T-maze, food-reinforced drug-discrimination procedure. The direct GABA(B) agonist, baclofen, substituted completely for both training doses of GHB; its potency to substitute for GHB increased moderately as the training dose of GHB was increased. The positive GABA(A) modulator, diazepam, substituted partially for 300 mg/kg GHB, but failed to elicit GHB-appropriate responding in rats trained with the higher GHB dose. Finally, the GABA(B) antagonist, CGP 35348, completely blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of the high training dose of GHB, but only partially antagonized the effects of the low training dose. These results suggest that (a) GHB produces a compound stimulus, and (b) both GABA(B)- and GABA(A)-mediated cues are prominent components of this compound stimulus; the contribution of each component, however, appears to vary as the training dose of GHB is increased.

Salvia miltiorrhiza extract inhibits alcohol absorption, preference, and discrimination in sP rats

Experiment 1 of the present study investigated the ability of a standardized extract of Salvia miltiorrhiza in reducing voluntary ethanol intake in ethanol-preferring rats of the sP line. Ethanol intake occurred under the two-bottle free-choice regimen between 10% (v/v) ethanol and water in daily 4-h scheduled access periods; water was present 24 h/day. Intragastric administration of 200 mg/kg Salvia miltiorrhiza extract resulted in approximately 40% reduction in ethanol intake and preference throughout the 4-day treatment. This effect of Salvia miltiorrhiza extract was likely due to its ability of altering ethanol absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Indeed, Experiments 2 and 3 of this study demonstrated that 200 mg/kg Salvia miltiorrhiza extract reduced blood ethanol levels (BELs) up to 60% in comparison to control rats, when ethanol was given IG, whereas it failed to modify BELs when ethanol was injected IP. The reducing effect of Salvia miltiorrhiza extract on ethanol absorption may have therefore resulted in an attenuated perception of the psychoactive effects of ethanol sought by ethanol-drinking rats. Consistently, the results of Experiment 4 of the present study demonstrated that a combination of 200 mg/kg Salvia miltiorrhiza extract IG and 1 or 2 g/kg ethanol IG resulted in a partial blockade of the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in sP rats trained to discriminate these doses of ethanol from water in a drug discrimination procedure. Collectively, the results are discussed as being suggestive that drugs curbing ethanol absorption from the gastrointestinal tract may constitute a novel strategy for controlling excessive alcohol consumption in human alcoholics.

Involvement of GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors in the mediation of discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid

The present study was designed to further investigate the pharmacological profile of the discriminative stimulus effects of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB). Drugs acting at the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)B receptor (baclofen and CGP 35348), GABA(A)/benzodiazepine receptor complex (diazepam), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex (dizocilpine), and cannabinoid receptor (WIN 55,212-2) were tested for substitution or blockade of the GHB interoceptive cue in rats trained to discriminate either 300 or 700 mg/kg of GHB i.g. from water in a T-maze, food-reinforced drug discrimination paradigm. Baclofen completely substituted for both training doses of GHB; however, its potency in substituting for GHB increased as the training dose of GHB was increased. CGP 35348 partially and completely blocked the cue elicited by 300 and 700 mg/kg of GHB, respectively. In contrast, diazepam partially substituted for 300 mg/kg of GHB, while failing to produce a GHB-appropriate response in the rat group trained to the higher GHB dose. Neither dizocilpine nor WIN 55,212-2 substituted for GHB. Collectively, these data suggest that: a) GHB produces a compound stimulus; and b) GABA(B)- and GABA(A)-mediated cues are prominent components of the mixed stimulus of GHB. However, the quality (i.e., the proportion of the component cues) of the stimulus varies as the training dose of GHB is increased; indeed, the contribution of the GABA(A)- and GABA(B)-mediated cues were smaller and greater, respectively, at 700 and 300 mg/kg of GHB training doses.