Pharmacological prevention of suicidal behaviour

Pharmacological interventions for co-occurring psychopathology in people with borderline personality disorder: secondary analysis of the Cochrane systematic review with meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Medications are commonly used to treat co-occurring psychopathology in persons with borderline personality disorder (BPD).

AIMS

To systematically review and integrate the evidence of medications for treatment of co-occurring psychopathology in people with BPD, and explore the role of comorbidities.

METHOD

Building on the current Cochrane review of medications in BPD, an update literature search was done in March 2024. We followed the methods of this Cochrane review, but scrutinised all identified placebo-controlled trials post hoc for reporting of non BPD-specific ('co-occurring') psychopathology, and explored treatment effects in subgroups of samples with and without defined co-occurring disorders. GRADE ratings were done to assess the evidence certainty.

RESULTS

Twenty-two trials were available for quantitative analyses. For antipsychotics, we found very-low-certainty evidence (VLCE) of an effect on depressive symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.22, P = 0.04), and low-certainty evidence (LCE) of an effect on psychotic-dissociative symptoms (SMD -0.28, P = 0.007). There was evidence of effects of anticonvulsants on depressive (SMD -0.44, P = 0.02; LCE) and anxious symptoms (SMD -1.11, P < 0.00001; VLCE). For antidepressants, no significant findings were observed (VLCE). Exploratory subgroup analyses indicated a greater effect of antipsychotics in samples including participants with co-occurring substance use disorders on psychotic-dissociative symptoms (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings, based on VLCE and LCE only, do not support the use of pharmacological interventions in people with BPD to target co-occurring psychopathology. Overall, the current evidence does not support differential treatment effects in persons with versus without defined comorbidities. Medications should be used cautiously to target co-occurring psychopathology.

Pharmacological interventions for people with borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND

Among people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) who are engaged in clinical care, prescription rates of psychotropic medications are high, despite the fact that medication use is off-label as a treatment for BPD. Nevertheless, people with BPD often receive several psychotropic drugs at a time for sustained periods.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of pharmacological treatment for people with BPD.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, 14 other databases and four trials registers up to February 2022. We contacted researchers working in the field to ask for additional data from published and unpublished trials, and handsearched relevant journals. We did not restrict the search by year of publication, language or type of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing pharmacological treatment to placebo, other pharmacologic treatments or a combination of pharmacologic treatments in people of all ages with a formal diagnosis of BPD. The primary outcomes were BPD symptom severity, self-harm, suicide-related outcomes, and psychosocial functioning. Secondary outcomes were individual BPD symptoms, depression, attrition and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's risk of bias tool and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We performed data analysis using Review Manager 5 and quantified the statistical reliability of the data using Trial Sequential Analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 46 randomised controlled trials (2769 participants) in this review, 45 of which were eligible for quantitative analysis and comprised 2752 participants with BPD in total. This is 18 more trials than the 2010 review on this topic. Participants were predominantly female except for one trial that included men only. The mean age ranged from 16.2 to 39.7 years across the included trials. Twenty-nine different types of medications compared to placebo or other medications were included in the analyses. Seventeen trials were funded or partially funded by the pharmaceutical industry, 10 were funded by universities or research foundations, eight received no funding, and 11 had unclear funding. For all reported effect sizes, negative effect estimates indicate beneficial effects by active medication. Compared with placebo, no difference in effects were observed on any of the primary outcomes at the end of treatment for any medication. Compared with placebo, medication may have little to no effect on BPD symptom severity, although the evidence is of very low certainty (antipsychotics: SMD -0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.45 to 0.08; 8 trials, 951 participants; antidepressants: SMD -0.27, 95% CI -0.65 to 1.18; 2 trials, 87 participants; mood stabilisers: SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.57; 4 trials, 265 participants). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of medication compared with placebo on self-harm, indicating little to no effect (antipsychotics: RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.84; 2 trials, 76 participants; antidepressants: MD 0.45 points on the Overt Aggression Scale-Modified-Self-Injury item (0-5 points), 95% CI -10.55 to 11.45; 1 trial, 20 participants; mood stabilisers: RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.48; 1 trial, 276 participants). The evidence is also very uncertain about the effect of medication compared with placebo on suicide-related outcomes, with little to no effect (antipsychotics: SMD 0.05, 95 % CI -0.18 to 0.29; 7 trials, 854 participants; antidepressants: SMD -0.26, 95% CI -1.62 to 1.09; 2 trials, 45 participants; mood stabilisers: SMD -0.36, 95% CI -1.96 to 1.25; 2 trials, 44 participants). Very low-certainty evidence shows little to no difference between medication and placebo on psychosocial functioning (antipsychotics: SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.00; 7 trials, 904 participants; antidepressants: SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.06; 4 trials, 161 participants; mood stabilisers: SMD -0.01, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.26; 2 trials, 214 participants). Low-certainty evidence suggests that antipsychotics may slightly reduce interpersonal problems (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.08; 8 trials, 907 participants), and that mood stabilisers may result in a reduction in this outcome (SMD -0.58, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.02; 4 trials, 300 participants). Antidepressants may have little to no effect on interpersonal problems, but the corresponding evidence is very uncertain (SMD -0.07, 95% CI -0.69 to 0.55; 2 trials, 119 participants). The evidence is very uncertain about dropout rates compared with placebo by antipsychotics (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.38; 13 trials, 1216 participants). Low-certainty evidence suggests there may be no difference in dropout rates between antidepressants (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.76; 6 trials, 289 participants) and mood stabilisers (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.15; 9 trials, 530 participants), compared to placebo. Reporting on adverse events was poor and mostly non-standardised. The available evidence on non-serious adverse events was of very low certainty for antipsychotics (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.29; 5 trials, 814 participants) and mood stabilisers (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.01; 1 trial, 276 participants). For antidepressants, no data on adverse events were identified.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review included 18 more trials than the 2010 version, so larger meta-analyses with more statistical power were feasible. We found mostly very low-certainty evidence that medication may result in no difference in any primary outcome. The rest of the secondary outcomes were inconclusive. Very limited data were available for serious adverse events. The review supports the continued understanding that no pharmacological therapy seems effective in specifically treating BPD pathology. More research is needed to understand the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of BPD better. Also, more trials including comorbidities such as trauma-related disorders, major depression, substance use disorders, or eating disorders are needed. Additionally, more focus should be put on male and adolescent samples.

Differences in antipsychotic treatment between depressive patients with and without a suicide attempt

BACKGROUND

Depressed suicide attempters are, according to some earlier studies, treated more often with antipsychotics than depressive non-suicide attempters. Cluster B personality disorders, especially borderline personality disorder, are associated with a high suicide risk, and antipsychotics are commonly used for the reduction of symptoms. However, no previous study has taken comorbid personality disorders into account when assessing the use of antipsychotics in patients with unipolar depression. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical selection of pharmacotherapy in unipolar depression with and without a previous suicide attempt, taking into account potential confounders such as cluster B personality disorders.

METHODS

The study sample consisted of 247 patients with unipolar depression. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Lund, Sweden. Study participants were recruited from 4 different secondary psychiatric care clinics in Sweden and were diagnosed according to the DSM-IV-TR with the MINI and SCID II. Previous and ongoing psychiatric treatments were investigated in detail and medical records were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of the patients had made previous suicide attempts. Depressed suicide attempters underwent both lifetime treatment with antipsychotics and an ongoing antipsychotic treatment significantly more often than non-attempters. Significances remained after a regression analysis, adjusting for cluster B personality disorders, symptom severity, age at the onset of depression, and lifetime psychotic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to consider the effect of comorbidity with cluster B personality disorders when comparing treatment of depressive suicide and non-suicide attempters. Our findings suggest that suicide attempters are more frequently treated with antipsychotics compared to non-suicide attempters, regardless of cluster B personality disorder comorbidity. These findings are important for clinicians to consider and would also be relevant to future studies evaluating reduction of suicide risk with antipsychotics in patients with psychiatric comorbidity and a history of attempted suicide.

Off-label use of second-generation antipsychotics in borderline personality disorder: a comparative real-world study among oral and long-acting injectables in Spain

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of oral vs. long-acting injectables (LAIs) antipsychotics, as well as, to compare the effectiveness of different LAI antipsychotics [aripiprazole-1-month, paliperidone-1-month (PP1M), paliperidone-3-month (PP3M) and risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI)] in patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD), by evaluating the following clinical outcomes: (1) the number of hospital admissions; (2) the number of documented suicidal behaviour/attempts; and (3) the use of concomitant treatments, including benzodiazepines, oral antipsychotics and biperiden. We included a total of 116 patients diagnosed with BPD and treated with antipsychotic medication: 50 using a LAI antipsychotic formulation and 66 using the equivalent main oral antipsychotic. Patients treated with LAIs showed a decreased ratio of visits to emergency compared with the oral treatment group, and between LAIs, PP3M vs. aripiprazole-1-month group. Furthermore, patients treated with LAIs used lower number and dose of concomitant antipsychotics compared with patients treated with oral antipsychotics. Moreover, PP1M and PP3M used lower daily dose of diazepam equivalents compared with the aripiprazole-1-month and RLAI treatment groups. In conclusion, the use of LAIs may play a role in the management of BPD.

Suicide attempts and suicidal ideation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is controversy on the magnitude of suicide risk in OCD and on the psychopathological features that raise the risk. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the pooled prevalence of suicide attempts and suicidal ideation (current/lifetime) in subjects with OCD and identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with greater risk.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search in PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL databases up to June 20, 2019, according to PRISMA guidelines. Stata statistical software (Version 15) was used to obtain forest plots, execute subgroup analyses and perform univariate and multivariate meta-regressions.

RESULTS

We found 61 eligible studies including OCD patients: 52 investigated suicide attempts and reported a pooled prevalence of 0.135 (95% CI 0.123-0.147); 26 explored current suicidal ideation and reported a pooled prevalence of 0.273 (95% CI 0.214-0.335); 22 researched lifetime suicidal ideation and reported a pooled prevalence of 0.473 (95% CI 0.397-0.548). Severity of obsessions, comorbid substance use and depressive/anxious symptoms increased the risk, whereas compulsions had a comparatively protective effect.

LIMITATIONS

Owing to the small number of studies reporting completed suicide rates, this metric was not included in the meta-analysis. The degree of heterogeneity between the studies was high.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should keep in mind that one out of ten patients with OCD attempts suicide during his/her lifetime, about one third has current suicidal ideation and about half has had suicidal ideation in the past. Several clinical features are associated with increased risk and should be factored into clinical risk management.

Real-World Effectiveness of Clozapine for Borderline Personality Disorder: Results From a 2-Year Mirror-Image Study

While some second-generation antipsychotics have shown efficacy on patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD), limited data exist regarding the effect of clozapine. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effects of clozapine on naturalistic outcomes in BPD patients with a 2-year mirror-image model. Among 25,916 patients with BPD, 1,107 redeemed ≥ 1 clozapine prescription. Of these, 18,188 were "specific" BPD patients, and 102 redeemed ≥ 1 clozapine prescription. During a mean observation period of 598.51 days, in all BPD patients, clozapine was associated with a significant reduction in psychiatric admissions from 2.52 (95% CI [2.31, 2.78]) to 2.00 (95% CI [1.77, 2.23]) admissions (p < .001) and a significant reduction in psychiatric bed-days from 190.08 (95% CI [176.84, 203.33]) to 65.95 (95% CI [58.27, 73.66]) bed-days (p < .001). Similar findings were found for "specific" BPD patients. The number of patients with intentional self-harm or overdose decreased significantly from 189 to 114 individuals (p < .001) after clozapine initiation. Randomized trials evaluating the risk- benefit ratio of clozapine in patients with severe BPD are warranted.

Drug treatment for personality disorders

There is some evidence that antidepressants, particularly the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the monoamine oxidase inhibitors, have some benefits in the management of borderline personality disorder, and lesser evidence (partly because of limited trial data) for the benefits of antipsychotic drugs and mood stabilisers. There is not sufficient distinction between the different personality disorders to recommend that any one disorder should be treated by any one drug, and successful treatment is dependent on careful management, sensitive to the patient's expectations.

Pharmacotherapy of personality disorders: what we know and what we have to search for

Pharmacotherapy for personality disorders is in the early stage of development because the evidence base for effective drug treatment is insufficient, biased toward borderline personality disorder and rampant with methodological issues. In this paper, we reviewed randomized, placebo-controlled trials of drugs efficacy in patients with personality disorders published between 1990 and 2016. Overwhelming majority of studies focused on borderline personality disorder, and the accumulation of evidence resulted in seven meta-analyses, which are interpreted into better strategies for evidence-based practice. Little research attention was given to schizotypal and antisocial personality disorders, with only indirect treatment efficacy evidence for the obsessive–compulsive and avoidant personality disorders. Some avenues for future efficacy research are indicated.

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guideline for the management of deliberate self-harm

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidance for the organisation and delivery of clinical services and the clinical management of patients who deliberately self-harm, based on scientific evidence supplemented by expert clinical consensus and expressed as recommendations.

METHOD

Articles and information were sourced from search engines including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO for several systematic reviews, which were supplemented by literature known to the deliberate self-harm working group, and from published systematic reviews and guidelines for deliberate self-harm. Information was reviewed by members of the deliberate self-harm working group, and findings were then formulated into consensus-based recommendations and clinical guidance. The guidelines were subjected to successive consultation and external review involving expert and clinical advisors, the public, key stakeholders, professional bodies and specialist groups with interest and expertise in deliberate self-harm.

RESULTS

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm provide up-to-date guidance and advice regarding the management of deliberate self-harm patients, which is informed by evidence and clinical experience. The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm is intended for clinical use and service development by psychiatrists, psychologists, physicians and others with an interest in mental health care.

CONCLUSION

The clinical practice guidelines for deliberate self-harm address self-harm within specific population sub-groups and provide up-to-date recommendations and guidance within an evidence-based framework, supplemented by expert clinical consensus.

WITHDRAWN: Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for deliberate self harm

This review has been withdrawn because the topic has been split into three separate reviews, one on psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults; another on interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents; and a third on pharmacological interventions for self‐harm in adults.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder--current evidence and recent trends

Drug treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) is common but mostly not supported by evidence from high-quality research. This review summarises the current evidence up to August 2014 and also aims to identify research trends in terms of ongoing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) as well as research gaps. There is some evidence for beneficial effects by second-generation antipsychotics, mood stabilisers and omega-3 fatty acids, while the overall evidence base is still unsatisfying. The dominating role SSRI antidepressants usually play within the medical treatment of BPD patients is neither reflected nor supported by corresponding evidence. Any drug treatment of BPD patients should be planned and regularly evaluated against this background of evidence. Research trends indicate increasing attention to alternative treatments such as dietary supplementation by omega-3 fatty acids or oxytocin.

Suicidal behaviour and cognitive problem solving therapy: theory, application and review

Suicidal behaviour is a major public health problem worldwide, both with regard to mortality and treatment of clients who have deliberately harmed themselves. It is a multifaceted problem resulting from complex interactions between social, biological and psychological factors. There is insufficient evidence on which to make firm recommendations about the most effective forms of treatment This is remarkable considering the extent of the problem worldwide, and the importance of dealing with it appropriately in order to prevent further suicides.

Suicide attempts: prevention of repetition

OBJECTIVE

To present an overview of promising strategies to prevent repetition of suicidal behaviours.

METHOD

This literature review on tertiary preventive interventions of suicide attempts was produced using the computerized databases PubMed and PsycINFO from January 1966 to September 2010, using French- and English-language limits and the key words: suicid* or deliberate self-harm and treatment* or therapy or intervention* or management.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 35 included studies showed statistically significant effects of fewer repeated attempts or suicides in the experimental condition. Overall, 22 studies focused on more traditional approaches, that is, pharmacological or psychological approaches. Only 2 of the 6 pharmacological treatments proved significantly superior to a placebo- a study of lithium with depression and flupenthixol with personality disorders. Eight out of 16 psychological treatments proved superior to treatment as usual or another approach: cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) (n = 4), (including dialectical behaviour therapy [n = 2]); psychodynamic therapy (n = 2); mixed (CBT plus psychodynamic therapy [n = 1]); and motivational approach and change in therapist (n = 1). Among the 8 studies using visit, postal, or telephone contact or green-token emergency card provision, 2 were significant: one involving telephone follow-up and the other telephone follow-up or visits. Hospitalization was not related to fewer attempts, and 1 of the 4 outreach approaches had significant results: a program involving individualized biweekly treatment. The rationale behind these single or multiple approaches still needs to be clarified. There were methodological flaws in many studies and some had very specific limited samples.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for more research addressing the problem in definitions of outcomes and measurement of the dependent variables, gender-specific effects, and inclusion of high-risk groups. There is a need for the development and evaluation of new approaches that support collaboration with community resources and more careful assessment and comparisons of existing treatments with different populations.

Evidence-based pharmacotherapy for personality disorders

Patients with personality disorders are prescribed psychotropic medications with greater frequency than almost any other diagnostic group. Prescribing practices in these populations are often based on anecdotal evidence rather than rigorous data. Although evidence-based psychotherapy remains an integral part of treatment, Axis II psychopathology is increasingly conceptualized according to neurobiological substrates that correspond to specific psychopharmacological strategies. We summarize the best available evidence regarding medication treatment of personality disordered patients and provide optimal strategies for evidence-based practice. Most available evidence is concentrated around borderline and schizotypal personality disorders, with some additional evidence concerning the treatment of avoidant and antisocial personality disorders. Although maladaptive personality symptoms respond to antidepressants, antipsychotics, mood stabilizers, and other medications, evidence-based pharmacotherapy is most useful in treating circumscribed symptom domains and induces only partial improvement. Most available evidence supports use of medication in reducing impulsivity and aggression, characteristic of borderline and antisocial psychopathology. Efforts have also begun to reduce psychotic-like symptoms and improve cognitive deficits characteristic of schizotypy. Indirect evidence is also provided for psychopharmacological reduction of social anxiety central to avoidant personality disorder. Evidence-based practice requires attention to domains of expected clinical improvement associated with a medication, relative to the potential risks. The development of future rational pharmacotherapy will require increased understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of personality disorders and their component dimensions. Increasing efforts to translate personality theory and social cognitive neuroscience into increasingly specific neurobiological substrates may provide more effective targets for pharmacotherapy.

A comparison of UK and US guidelines for drug treatment in borderline personality disorder

The UK and USA differ considerably in their guidance regarding the use of drug treatment for borderline personality disorder, but generally agree over the use of psychological treatment. The 2009 UK guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) do not recommend any form of drug treatment except in a crisis with the intention of ceasing such treatment shortly afterwards. The US guidelines from the American Psychiatric Association (APA), published in 2001, are much more positive and suggest that there is a place for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), mood stabilizers and antipsychotic drugs as adjunctive treatments in borderline personality disorder. The guidelines are summarized and two main reasons for the differences identified. First, the separation of the borderline personality group into those with 'affective dysregulation', 'impulsive behaviour dyscontrol' and 'cognitive-perceptual' symptoms in the US guidelines was felt by the guideline development group for the NICE guideline to be a post hoc classification not supported by any other evidence. Second, the threshold of evidence necessary for making recommendations was much higher for the UK than the US guideline. Both guidelines recognize that we need more substantial trials, preferably independent of the pharmaceutical industry, before we can have any real confidence in our recommendations.

Differential effectiveness of antipsychotics in borderline personality disorder: meta-analyses of placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials on symptomatic outcome domains

OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, antipsychotic drugs are widely used in borderline personality disorder (BPD). To evaluate current pharmacological treatment algorithms and guidelines for BPD, the authors reviewed and meta-analyzed studies on the effectiveness of antipsychotics on specific symptom domains in BPD.

METHODS

The literature was searched for placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (PC-RCTs) on the effectiveness of antipsychotics regarding cognitive perceptual symptoms, impulsive behavioral dyscontrol, and affective dysregulation (with subdomains depressed mood, anxiety, anger, and mood lability) in BPD. Studies whose primary emphasis was on the treatment of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition schizotypal personality disorder or Axis I disorders were excluded.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses were conducted using 11 retrieved studies including 1152 borderline patients. Antipsychotics have a significant effect on cognitive perceptual symptoms (9 PC-RCTs; standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.23) and mood lability (5 PC-RCTs; SMD, 0.20) as well as on global functioning (8 PC-RCTs; SMD, 0.25), but these effects have to be qualified as small. Antipsychotics have a more pronounced effect on anger (9 PC-RCTs; SMD, 0.39). Antipsychotics did not have a significant effect on impulsive behavioral dyscontrol, depressed mood, and anxiety in BPD.

CONCLUSION

Drug therapy tailored to well-defined symptom domains can have beneficial effects in BPD. At short term, antipsychotics can have significant effects on cognitive-perceptual symptoms, anger, and mood lability, but the wide and long-term use of antipsychotics in these patients remains controversial. The findings from this study raise questions on current pharmacological algorithms and clinical guidelines.

The role of psychopharmacology in suicide prevention

The potential role of psychopharmacology in suicide prevention is often minimised. This may to some extent reflect that few medication trials have specifically focussed on prevention of suicidal behaviour – indeed this outcome is often not reported in trials. However, there is reasonably strong evidence that lithium may reduce risk of suicide, the postulated mechanism being a specific effect on aggression. Evidence is lacking with regard to any protective effect of other mood stabilizers. Clozapine may reduce suicidal behaviour in patients with schizophrenia, with reduction of affective symptoms being a possible explanation. The role of antidepressants in relation to suicide risk is highly controversial, especially in children and adolescents. It is unclear whether minor tranquillizers or hypnotics can assist in suicide prevention, although they can reduce the anxiety symptoms that may occur during initial treatment with SSRI antidepressants. Itis also uncertain whether psychopharmacology has a role in preventing suicidal behaviour in people with personality disorders. Despite the limitations of the evidence we contend that suicide risk should be an important factor in deciding when and what to prescribe.

Declaration of Interest: We have no interests to declare.

Pharmacological interventions for borderline personality disorder

BACKGROUND

Drugs are widely used in borderline personality disorder (BPD) treatment, chosen because of properties known from other psychiatric disorders ("off-label use"), mostly targeting affective or impulsive symptom clusters.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of drug treatment in BPD patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched bibliographic databases according to the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group strategy up to September 2009, reference lists of articles, and contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised studies comparing drug versus placebo, or drug versus drug(s) in BPD patients. Outcomes included total BPD severity, distinct BPD symptom facets according to DSM-IV criteria, associated psychopathology not specific to BPD, attrition and adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors selected trials, assessed quality and extracted data, independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-eight trials involving a total of 1742 trial participants were included. First-generation antipsychotics (flupenthixol decanoate, haloperidol, thiothixene); second-generation antipsychotics (aripirazole, olanzapine, ziprasidone), mood stabilisers (carbamazepine, valproate semisodium, lamotrigine, topiramate), antidepressants (amitriptyline, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, phenelzine sulfate, mianserin), and dietary supplementation (omega-3 fatty acid) were tested. First-generation antipsychotics were subject to older trials, whereas recent studies focussed on second-generation antipsychotics and mood stabilisers. Data were sparse for individual comparisons, indicating marginal effects for first-generation antipsychotics and antidepressants.The findings were suggestive in supporting the use of second-generation antipsychotics, mood stabilisers, and omega-3 fatty acids, but require replication, since most effect estimates were based on single studies. The long-term use of these drugs has not been assessed.Adverse event data were scarce, except for olanzapine. There was a possible increase in self-harming behaviour, significant weight gain, sedation and changes in haemogram parameters with olanzapine. A significant decrease in body weight was observed with topiramate treatment. All drugs were well tolerated in terms of attrition.Direct drug comparisons comprised two first-generation antipsychotics (loxapine versus chlorpromazine), first-generation antipsychotic against antidepressant (haloperidol versus amitriptyline; haloperidol versus phenelzine sulfate), and second-generation antipsychotic against antidepressant (olanzapine versus fluoxetine). Data indicated better outcomes for phenelzine sulfate but no significant differences in the other comparisons, except olanzapine which showed more weight gain and sedation than fluoxetine. The only trial testing single versus combined drug treatment (olanzapine versus olanzapine plus fluoxetine; fluoxetine versus fluoxetine plus olanzapine) yielded no significant differences in outcomes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence indicates some beneficial effects with second-generation antipsychotics, mood stabilisers, and dietary supplementation by omega-3 fatty acids. However, these are mostly based on single study effect estimates. Antidepressants are not widely supported for BPD treatment, but may be helpful in the presence of comorbid conditions. Total BPD severity was not significantly influenced by any drug. No promising results are available for the core BPD symptoms of chronic feelings of emptiness, identity disturbance and abandonment. Conclusions have to be drawn carefully in the light of several limitations of the RCT evidence that constrain applicability to everyday clinical settings (among others, patients' characteristics and duration of interventions and observation periods).

Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapies for borderline personality disorder

Borderline personality disorder is a pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, affects and self-image, as well as marked impulsivity. Although psychotherapy is needed to attain lasting improvements in a patient's personality and overall functioning, practice guidelines state that pharmacotherapy is indicated to manage state symptoms and trait vulnerabilities. Three psychopathological dimensions are the main targets for pharmacotherapy of borderline personality disorder: affective dysregulation, impulsive-behavioural dyscontrol and cognitive-perceptual symptoms. Guidelines recommend the use of antidepressant agents and mood stabilizers for affective dysregulation and impulsive-behavioural dyscontrol, and antipsychotics for cognitive-perceptual symptoms. This review aims to report and discuss data from clinical trials, reviews and meta-analyses concerning drug efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Investigations that considered antidepressant agents mainly focused on SSRIs, which are recommended as first-line treatments for affective instability and impulse dyscontrol. Both open-label and randomized controlled studies have been performed, predominantly concerning the efficacy of fluoxetine and fluvoxamine. Other classes of antidepressants, such as TCAs and MAOIs, were investigated as alternative treatments for borderline personality disorder, but the risk of adverse effects and toxicity is a limitation to their use in clinical practice. Increasing amounts of data have recently been collected on the use of mood stabilizers to control mood instability and impulsivity in patients with borderline personality disorder. More substantial data were derived from controlled trials of valproate semisodium, although other drugs such as lithium, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine were tested with promising results. Several first-generation antipsychotics were studied in open-label and controlled trials, with good effects on behavioural dyscontrol and psychotic-like symptoms. Selection biases and heterogeneity of drugs and methods somewhat limited the value of these results. More recent investigations have examined atypical antipsychotics, with most of these studies being open-label trials with small sample sizes; however, a few controlled studies have been performed using olanzapine, showing improvements in impulsivity, anger and hostility. In conclusion, a large number of different drugs have been evaluated in the treatment of patients with borderline personality disorder. Initial findings are encouraging for many of these drugs. However, data need to be replicated in further controlled studies with head-to-head comparisons and long-term follow-ups. Many questions remain to be answered.

Evidenced-based pharmacologic treatment of borderline personality disorder: a shift from SSRIs to anticonvulsants and atypical antipsychotics?

OBJECTIVE

The authors performed a review of double-blind, controlled studies of psychotropic drugs to evaluate the evidence base supporting their use in treatment of borderline personality disorder.

METHODS

English language literature cited in Medline and published between 1970 and 2006 was searched using the following terms: anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, benzodiazepines, borderline personality disorder, lithium, medication, mood stabilizers, pharmacotherapy, and psychotropics. Only reports of double-blind, randomized, controlled trials were included.

RESULTS

Twenty eight double-blind, randomized, controlled trials were identified which included anticonvulsants, classical neuroleptics, the benzodiazepine alprazolam, lithium, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, the novel antipsychotic olanzapine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and omega-3 fatty acids. All but three were placebo-controlled. With the exception of alprazolam and tricyclics, the data from these trials revealed evidence of improvements, although often circumscribed and variable. The novel antipsychotic olanzapine appeared to have the most empirical support for having a favorable effect on borderline personality disorder.

CONCLUSION

A growing body of data suggests that there are psychotropic agents which appear to be well tolerated, and which to varying degrees may be expected to ameliorate the domains of psychopathology associated with borderline personality disorder. The research literature, on which practice should be optimally based, appears to suggest a need for a shift from antidepressants to anticonvulsants and atypical antipsychotics.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of personality disorders

These practical guidelines for the biological treatment of personality disorders in primary care settings were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). They embody the results of a systematic review of all available clinical and scientific evidence pertaining to the biological treatment of three specific personality disorders, namely borderline, schizotypal and anxious/avoidant personality disorder in addition to some general recommendations for the whole field. The guidelines cover disease definition, classification, epidemiology, course and current knowledge on biological underpinnings, and provide a detailed overview on the state of the art of clinical management. They deal primarily with biological treatment (including antidepressants, neuroleptics, mood stabilizers and some further pharmacological agents) and discuss the relative significance of medication within the spectrum of treatment strategies that have been tested for patients with personality disorders, up to now. The recommendations should help the clinician to evaluate the efficacy spectrum of psychotropic drugs and therefore to select the drug best suited to the specific psychopathology of an individual patient diagnosed for a personality disorder.

Efficacy of quetiapine for impulsivity and affective symptoms in borderline personality disorder

Data on the efficacy of quetiapine in borderline personality disorder (BPD) are still scarce. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of quetiapine for impulsivity and a broad range of affective symptoms in BPD. In this 12-week open-label study, we included individuals with BPD who presented to psychiatric in- and outpatient services. After a gradual titration of quetiapine, a flexible dose (range, 100-800 mg) was administered. The main outcome measures consisted of the scores on patient-rated questionnaires (Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory, Affective Lability Scale, Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory, Spielberger State and Trait Anger Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory) and on neurocognitive tasks related to impulsivity (Stroop Color Word Task and IOWA Gambling Task). A mixed linear model, correcting for age, sex, antidepressant use, and weeks in psychotherapy, was applied. Forty-one patients (34 females and 7 males; mean [SD] age, 27.0 [9.0] years) were enrolled in the study, 32 of which completed the trial. Patients' scores decreased significantly (mean [SD] difference; P value) on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (19.7 [2.0]; P < 0.0001), Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (11.5 [1.4]; P < 0.0001), Affective Lability Scale (0.75 [0.08]; P < 0.0001), Beck Depression Inventory (25.0 [1.7]; P < 0.0001), Spielberger State and Trait Anxiety Inventory state (19.9 [1.9]; P < 0.0001) and trait (20.8 [1.7]; P < 0.0001) subscale, and Spielberger State and Trait Anger Inventory state (7.3 [1.1]; P < 0.0001) and trait (10.1 [1.0]; P < 0.0001) subscale. In addition, patients showed significantly less inference on the Stroop Color Word Task and had more 'good choices' on the IOWA Gambling Task. These results suggest that quetiapine may be efficacious in the treatment of impulsivity and affective symptoms in BPD.

The under-recognized role of dopamine in the treatment of major depressive disorder

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is currently the second most common cause of disability worldwide. Current treatment of MDD with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors is limited by efficacy and tolerability issues, highlighting the unmet need in the treatment of patients with MDD. Deficiencies in dopamine, serotonin and noradrenaline are thought to underpin MDD pathophysiology. Atypical antipsychotics, which modulate these receptor systems, may provide additional treatment options. This article assesses the current treatment options available for patients with MDD and considers possible future therapies. The potential role of atypical antipsychotics such as olanzapine, risperidone and quetiapine in the treatment of MDD is explored based on evidence from bipolar depression trials and preliminary studies in patients with MDD.

Off-label use of antipsychotics: are we mad?

The off-label prescribing of antipsychotic drugs to psychiatric patients of all ages is very common. Such off-label use is a necessary part of the art of psychiatry but brings with it increased responsibilities for the prescriber as, if the patient suffered an adverse reaction, liability would rest with the prescriber and/or their employers. This article reviews the frequency and nature of the off-label prescribing of antipsychotic drugs for psychiatric indications to children, adults and the elderly. It also reviews the evidence base for doing so in a variety of common, and also some less common, clinical situations. The review is mainly concerned with off-label indications but a short section on high dose antipsychotics is also included. The review concludes that the off-label prescription of antipsychotics frequently lacks the support of robust clinical trials. When prescribing off-label, the prescriber must carry out a careful risk assessment of the risks and benefits for the individual patient. They should also inform the patient that the prescription is off-label.

Medications in the treatment of borderline personality disorder 2006

This review covers all significant randomized controlled trials and open trials of medications for the treatment of borderline personality disorder. New developments in the effectiveness of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics are discussed. Differences were found in the effectiveness of medications based on the presence or absence of depression and significant anger symptoms. Medications continue to be recommended as adjuncts to psychotherapy. Most of the trials discussed require replication, and more trials that investigate the effectiveness of medications in combination with psychotherapy are recommended.

The relationship between CSF HVA/5-HIAA ratio and suicide intent in suicide attempters

There is a need to find stable biomarkers for suicidal behavior and suicide prediction. Reduced homovanillic acid/5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (HVA/5-HIAA) ratios in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in depressed suicide attempters have been reported. Suicide intent is a predictor of repetition of attempts and suicide. In the present study we investigated the relationship of HVA/5-HIAA ratio to the scales rating suicide intent and depressive symptoms. Fifteen consecutive medication-free male suicide attempters admitted to a psychiatric ward at the Karolinska Hospital and eight healthy male volunteers underwent lumbar puncture and had the CSF monoamine metabolite levels assayed. Patients were assessed with the Beck Suicide Intent Scale (SIS), the Montgomery Asberg Depression rating Scale (MADRS) and the Chapman Scale of Anhedonia. Within the suicide attempter group, HVA/5-HIAA ratio was significantly associated with the Suicide Intent Scale (SIS), but not with the MADRS scale or the Chapman Scale of Anhedonia indicating that the HVA/5-HIAA ratio may be a biomarker of suicide intent.

A prospective study of the association of cerebrospinal fluid monoamine metabolite levels with lethality of suicide attempts in patients with bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVES

Bipolar disorder is a severe illness that is associated with suicidal behavior. A biological predictor of highly lethal suicide attempts in patients with bipolar disorder would be valuable. We hypothesized that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) monoamine metabolite levels are related to lethality of suicide attempts in bipolar patients and examined the relation between CSF 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA), homovanillic acid (HVA), and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) levels and maximum lethality of suicide attempts at baseline and during a 2-year follow up.

METHODS

Twenty-seven bipolar depressed patients participated in the study. Demographic and clinical parameters were examined and recorded. Lumbar punctures were performed and CSF 5-HIAA, HVA, and MHPG were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Following discharge, patients were evaluated after 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Each follow-up interview included an in-depth assessment of suicidal behavior during the intervening time period.

RESULTS

Six subjects made suicide attempts during the 2-year follow-up. Bipolar patients who attempted suicide during the follow-up period had higher aggression and hostility scale scores compared to bipolar subjects who did not make a suicide attempt during the follow-up period. CSF 5-HIAA, HVA, and MHPG levels were negatively correlated with the maximum lethality of suicide attempts during the 2-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding is the first observation that CSF monoamine metabolite levels may be predictors of lethality of suicide attempts in patients with bipolar disorder. Further studies are necessary to answer the question whether CSF monoamine metabolite levels are clinically useful biochemical predictors of highly lethal suicide attempts or completed suicides.

Lower cerebrospinal fluid homovanillic acid levels in depressed suicide attempters

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that the dopaminergic system is involved in the pathogenesis of major depression, Axis II disorders, and suicidal behavior. Depressed suicide attempters constitute a heterogenous group and important differences may exist between depressed suicide attempters with or without Axis II disorders. Therefore, we compared demographic and clinical parameters, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) homovanillic acid (HVA) levels in depressed suicide attempters without comorbid Axis II disorders, depressed non-attempters without comorbid Axis II disorders, and normal controls.

METHODS

Thirty-one depressed subjects with a history of a suicide attempt, 27 depressed subjects without a history of a suicide attempt, and 50 healthy controls were included in the study. Subjects with comorbid Axis II disorders were excluded. Demographic and clinical parameters, and CSF HVA levels were examined.

RESULTS

The two depressed groups did not differ with regard to depression, aggression, hopelessness, and total hostility scale scores. Depressed suicide attempters had higher current suicidal ideation scores compared to depressed non-attempters. Depressed suicide attempters had lower CSF HVA levels compared to depressed non-attempters (t = 4.4, df = 56, p < 0.0001) and to controls (t = -4.09, df = 79, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in CSF HVA levels between depressed non-attempters and controls (t < 1, df = 75, NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Dopaminergic abnormalities are associated with suicidality but not with depression. The variability in the rates of comorbid Axis II disorders and in the prevalence of suicide attempters in different patient populations may affect both clinical and biological results of studies of mood disorders.

Pharmacotherapy of suicidal behavior in bipolar disorder

Patients with Bipolar Disorder (BD) are at particularly high risk for both attempted and completed suicides. The period of highest risk for completed suicide is during the 2 years following discharge from a hospitalization. To date, pharmacological studies of suicidal behavior in BD have been quite limited. While strong evidence has been found regarding the anti-suicidal effects of lithium, evidence for such properties in other commonly prescribed medications for BD, including anticonvulsants, SSRIs and anti-psychotics, has been largely unexplored. Considering the high risk of suicidal acts in patients with BD, further research on the pharmacotherapy of suicidal behavior is crucial.

Remission from depression : a review of venlafaxine clinical and economic evidence

Worldwide, major depression is the leading cause of years lived with a disability, and the fourth cause of disability-adjusted life years. Depression is second only to hypertension as the most common chronic condition encountered in general medical practice. Unfortunately, despite the high prevalence of depression, under-recognition and under-treatment are common.Historically, clinicians have assessed the short-term effectiveness of antidepressants by response rates, often defined as a 50% reduction in depressive symptoms. However, this usually does not reflect true clinical remission, and residual symptoms are common. Persistence of residual symptoms appears to be a common link to relapse, chronic disability and suicide. The burden of not treating depression effectively to remission is significant, as the disease is an important contributor to the disability levels of the general population. Disability, in turn, has a profound impact on lost productivity and medical expenses. In 2000, depression cost the US more than US 83 billion dollars annually in lost productivity, medical expenses and premature death.Venlafaxine, a dual-acting serotonin norepinephrine (noradrenaline) reuptake inhibitor, may improve a patient's response to treatment and their chances of achieving complete remission compared with conventional antidepressant therapies, with the evidence for this being the strongest for comparisons with the selective serotonin receptor inhibitors (SSRIs). To date, there are only a small number of economic studies of venlafaxine, and most are cost or resource utilisation analyses with significant limitations. Nevertheless, two cost-effectiveness analyses of venlafaxine are available. They found venlafaxine had a lower average cost per patient achieving remission or per symptom-free day compared with SSRIs; one reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for venlafaxine of US 586 dollars (year 2002 values) per additional patient achieving remission over 8 weeks, and the other found venlafaxine to be a dominant treatment choice over SSRIs over 6 months (year 2001 values). Although requiring further confirmation, these initial data suggest that venlafaxine is a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of depression. The availability of an effective armamentarium of antidepressant strategies, including venlafaxine, to achieve and sustain remission offers both clinical and economic value to all those touched by the burden of depression.

Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult deliberate self-harm

BACKGROUND

The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists is co-ordinating the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in psychiatry, funded under the National Mental Health Strategy (Australia) and the New Zealand Health Funding Authority.

METHOD

For these guidelines, the CPG Team for Deliberate Self-harm reviewed the treatment outcome literature (including meta-analyses) and consulted with practitioners and patients.

TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS

(i) Organization of general hospital services to provide: emergency department admission; a safe environment; integrated medical and psychiatric management; risk assessment; identification of psychiatric morbidity, and adequate follow-up. (ii) Detection and treatment of any psychiatric disorder. (iii) Dialectical behaviour therapy, psychoanalytically orientated partial hospitalization or home-based interpersonal therapy (for certain patients) to reduce repetition of deliberate self-harm (DSH).

CONCLUSION

Deliberate self-harm is common and is costly in terms of both individual distress and service provision. General hospitals are often the first point of clinical contact, but may not be appropriately organized to care for these patients. Evidence for the effectiveness of psychological treatments is based on single RCTs without replication. The three recommended psychological treatments are not widely available in Australia and New Zealand, and the interventions that are, such as cognitive behaviour therapy, problem solving and 'green cards' (an agreement guaranteeing access to services), do not reduce repetition of DSH. The effect of follow-up in psychiatric hospitals or in the community is poorly understood. We need to develop and evaluate interventions that will reduce repetition of both fatal and non-fatal deliberate self-harm and improve the person's functioning and quality of life.

Dopamine dysfunction in borderline personality disorder: a hypothesis

Research on the biological basis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) has focused primarily on the serotonin model of impulsive aggression. However, there is evidence that dopamine (DA) dysfunction may also be associated with BPD. Pertinent research and review articles, identified by Medline searches of relevant topics, books, references from bibliographies, and conference proceedings from 1975 to 2003, were reviewed. Evidence of DA dysfunction in BPD derives from the efficacy of traditional and atypical antipsychotic agents in BPD, and from provocative challenges with amphetamine and methylphenidate of subjects with the disorder. In addition, human and animal studies indicate that DA activity plays an important role in emotion information processing, impulse control, and cognition. The results of this review suggest that DA dysfunction is associated with three dimensions of BPD, that is, emotional dysregulation, impulsivity, and cognitive-perceptual impairment. The main limitation of this hypothesis is that the evidence reviewed is circumstantial. There is no study that directly demonstrates DA dysfunction in BPD. In addition, the therapeutic effects of antipsychotic agents observed in BPD may be mediated by non-DA mechanisms of action. If the stated hypothesis is correct, DA dysfunction in BPD may result from genetic, developmental, or environmental factors directly affecting specific DA pathways. Alternatively, DA dysfunction in BPD may be a compensatory response to alterations in the primary neural systems that control emotion, impulse control, and cognition, and that are mediated by the brain's main neurotransmitters, glutamate, and GABA, or in one or more other neuromodulatory pathways such as serotonin, acetylcholine, and norepinephrine.

Postmortem serotonin (5-HT) concentrations in the cerebrospinal fluid of medicolegal cases

In a medicolegal study the postmortem serotonin (5-HT) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were determined in routine autopsies using a high performance liquid chromatographic procedure with electrochemical detection. There was no correlation between 5-HT concentrations and age, sex or blood alcohol concentration using a postmortem delay < or = 3 days. In suicides the suboccipital CSF concentrations were significantly decreased compared to the levels measured in the control group (8.55+/-5.99 ng/ml versus 20.15+/-13.56 ng/ml). Additionally, a decrease of 5-HT was found in the suboccipital CSF of opiate fatalities (15.56+/-13.52 ng/ml). The results support the hypothesis that decreased 5-HT concentrations in the CSF are characteristic in suicides. However, due to a rather broad overlapping of values between suicides and controls the results failed to define a possible cut-off level in the 5-HT CSF concentration to distinguish between a suicidal and a non-suicidal incident.

Achieving remission from depression with venlafaxine and venlafaxine extended release: a literature review of comparative studies with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate data supporting the ability of venlafaxine, an antidepressant with a dual mechanism of action, to produce remission from depression.

METHOD

Review of multicentre, double-blind, randomized studies comparing venlafaxine or venlafaxine extended release (XR) with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), using Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total scores in the range of < or = 7 and < 10 as the final outcome measure, to evaluate the ability of venlafaxine/venlafaxine XR to produce full remission from depression.

RESULTS

Venlafaxine/venlafaxine XR demonstrated higher rates of remission than did the SSRIs and placebo.

CONCLUSION

With full remission rather than response as the measure of outcome, venlafaxine/venlafaxine XR demonstrated more robust antidepressant efficacy than the SSRIs and placebo. This finding suggests that venlafaxine/venlafaxine XR are appropriate standard-of-care therapies for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder.

Suicidality, impulsivity and aggression--is there a link to 5HIAA concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid?

In biological suicide research, low cerebrospinal fluid-5-hydroxyindolacetic acid (CSF-5HIAA) concentrations have been associated with suicidality, aggression and impulsivity. However, it frequently appears that the interpretation of existing study results is flawed. The analysis of various published findings suggests that contaminating factors like impulsivity or depressive symptoms in suicide attempters are often not taken into consideration at the time of suicide. The seemingly 'robust' association of low CSF-5HIAA concentration with 'suicidality' and 'aggression' is in fact rather weak. Reported associations of subgroups of suicidal behavior (e.g. violent suicide attempts) with low CSF-5HIAA concentrations are likely to represent somewhat premature translations of findings from studies that have flaws in methodology. Furthermore, the perception of 'suicidal behavior' as autoaggressive behavior or inwardly directed aggression in the view of the authors may not be useful in biological suicide research. The construct of aggressivity is insufficiently defined, resulting in difficulties to interpret empirical data. Some evidence exists, however, that reduced CSF-5HIAA concentrations might be related to certain depressive symptoms and changes in impulsivity. More carefully designed studies are required to overcome the existing methodological shortcomings.

Serotonergic function and suicidal behavior in schizophrenia

Recent studies suggest that altered serotonergic (5-HT) function, as assessed by lower prolactin (PRL) response to fenfluramine (FEN), a specific 5-HT releaser and uptake inhibitor, is associated with suicidal behavior in either depressed and personality disordered patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate, in schizophrenic patients, the relationship between suicidal behavior and PRL response to D-fenfluramine (D-FEN). A D-FEN test was performed in 18 healthy controls and 33 drug-free DSM-IV schizophrenic patients (12 with a history of suicide attempts, 21 without it). Schizophrenic patients with a history of suicide attempts showed a lower PRL response to D-FEN (Delta PRL) compared to schizophrenic patients without such history (P<0.04) and also compared to healthy controls (P<0.0003). Delta PRL did not differentiate schizophrenic patients without suicide attempts and controls. These findings could not be explained by PRL basal hormonal levels, age, sex, menstrual status, demographic or clinical characteristics. These results suggest that PRL response to D-FEN is a marker of suicidal tendencies also in schizophrenia, supporting the hypothesis that a dysfunction in serotonergic function is associated with suicidal behavior regardless of the psychiatric diagnosis.

Role of dopamine in non-depressed patients with a history of suicide attempts

Several data are available about the implication of the dopaminergic system in the control of inward-directed aggression. Previously, we suggested an involvement of D2-dopaminergic function in the expression of suicidal behavior by demonstrating a smaller growth hormone (GH) response to apomorphine, a dopaminergic agonist, in depressed patients with a history of suicide attempts in comparison to non-attempters. In the present study, in order to test this hypothesis, GH responses to intravenous apomorphine were measured in non-depressed patients with a history of suicide attempts. The study was performed in 17 non-depressed male patients with a score less than 12 on the 17-item HAMD. The patients were subgrouped into suicide attempters (N = 7) and non-attempters (N = 10). Mean GH peak responses to apomorphine differed significantly between suicide attempters and non-attempters: (mean +/- SD) for GH peak, 10.4 +/- 8.2 ng/mL vs 27.3 +/- 13.1 ng/ml, F = 9.0, P = 0.009. In conclusion, dopaminergic disturbances seem to play a role in the biology of inward-directed aggression in non-depressed patients.

Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with suicidal behavior. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

These guidelines review what is known about the epidemiology, causes, management, and prevention of suicide and attempted suicide in young people. Detailed guidelines are provided concerning the assessment and emergency management of the children and adolescents who present with suicidal behavior. The guidelines also present suggestions on how the clinician may interface with the community. Crisis hotlines, method restriction, educational programs, and screening/ case-finding suicide prevention strategies are examined, and the clinician is advised on media counseling. Intervention in the community after a suicide, minimization of suicide contagion or imitation, and the training of primary care physicians and other gatekeepers to recognize and refer the potentially suicidal child and adolescent are discussed.

Impulse control in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a biopsychopathological approach

1. The dichotomy between behaviors (some pathological, some falling into the realm of criminality) characterized by an excessive impulsivity and others, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), in which a high resistance towards inner or outer impulses dominate, can not be sustained any more. 2. Classical descriptions of OCD include behavior patterns of low control of impulses, and individuals showing "low control of impulse disorders" are, more often than not, high controllers in the periods of time when the impulsivity is in the background. 3. Evidence from biological research and from treatment outcome studies also suggest common traits in the "hyponomic" (impulsive) and "hypernomic" (obsessive) individuals, related to serotonin (5-HT) metabolism disturbances.