Sleep deprivation in bright and dim light: antidepressant effects on major depressive disorder

Sleep-light interventions that shift melatonin rhythms earlier improve perimenopausal and postmenopausal depression: preliminary findings

OBJECTIVE

Testing the hypothesis that a sleep-light intervention, which phase-advances melatonin rhythms, will improve perimenopausal-postmenopausal (P-M; by follicle-stimulating hormone) depression.

METHODS

In at-home environments, we compared two contrasting interventions: (1) an active phase-advance intervention: one night of advanced/restricted sleep from 9 pm to 1 am , followed by 8 weeks of morning bright white light for 60 min/d within 30 minutes of awakening, and (2) a control phase-delay intervention: one night of delayed/restricted sleep (sleep from 3 to 7 am ) followed by 8 weeks of evening bright white light for 60 min/d within 90 minutes of bedtime. We tested 17 P-M participants, 9 normal controls and 8 depressed participants (DPs) (by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Fifth Edition] criteria). Clinicians assessed mood by structured interviews and subjective mood ratings. Participants wore actigraphs to measure sleep and activity and collected overnight urine samples for the melatonin metabolite, 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (6-SMT), before, during, and after interventions.

RESULTS

Baseline depressed mood correlated with delayed 6-SMT offset time (cessation of melatonin metabolite [6-SMT] secretion) ( r = +0.733, P = 0.038). After phase-advance intervention versus phase-delay intervention, 6-SMT offset (start of melatonin and 6-SMT decrease) was significantly advanced in DPs (mean ± SD, 2 h 15 min ± 12 min; P = 0.042); advance in 6-SMT acrophase (time of maximum melatonin and 6-SMT secretion) correlated positively with mood improvement ( r = +0.978, P = 0.001). Mood improved (+70%, P = 0.007) by both 2 and 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary findings reveal significantly phase-delayed melatonin rhythms in DP versus normal control P-M women. Phase-advancing melatonin rhythms improves mood in association with melatonin advance. Thus, sleep-light interventions may potentially offer safe, rapid, nonpharmaceutical, well-tolerated, affordable home treatments for P-M depression.

A 1-week sleep and light intervention improves mood in premenstrual dysphoric disorder in association with shifting melatonin offset time earlier

To test the hypothesis that 1 week of combined sleep and light interventions (SALI), which phase-advance (shift earlier) melatonin circadian rhythms, improves mood significantly more than phase-delay (shift later) SALI. After a 2-month diagnostic evaluation for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD per DSM-5 criteria) in a university clinical research setting, 44 participants enrolled in baseline studies were randomized in the luteal phase at home to (A) a phase-advance intervention (PAI): 1 night of late-night wake therapy (LWT: sleep 9 pm-1 am) followed by 7 days of the morning (AM) bright white light (BWL), or (B) a phase-delay intervention (PDI): 1 night of early-night wake therapy (EWT: sleep 3-7 am) plus 7 days of the evening (PM) BWL. After a month of no intervention, participants underwent the alternate intervention. Outcome measures were mood, the melatonin metabolite, 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (6-SMT), and actigraphy (to assess protocol compliance). At baseline, atypical depression correlated positively with phase delay in 6-SMT offset time (r = .456, p = .038). PAI advanced 6-SMT offset from baseline more than PDI (p < .05), and improved raw mood scores more than PDI (p < .05). As hypothesized, percent improvement in mood correlated positively with a phase advance from baseline in 6-SMT offset time (p < .001). Treatment with 1 night of advanced/restricted sleep followed by 7 days of AM BWL (PAI) was more efficacious in reducing PMDD depression symptoms than a PDI; mood improvement occurred in association with phase advance in 6-SMT offset time. Combined SALIs offer safe, efficacious, rapid-acting, well-tolerated, non-pharmacological, non-hormonal, affordable, repeatable home interventions for PMDD. Clinical Trials.gov NCT # NCT01799733.

Chronotherapy for the rapid treatment of depression: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronotherapy (sleep deprivation, sleep phase shifting and/or the use of bright light) combines non-invasive and non-pharmacological interventions that may act rapidly against depressive symptoms. However, to date no meta-analysis has been conducted to examine their effectiveness.

METHODS

We carried out meta-analysis of 16 studies (four randomised controlled trials and 12 open-label case series) with between-subject comparisons between experimental and control conditions for RCTs and within-subject comparisons between baseline and follow-up for all studies.

RESULTS

Overall chronotherapy was generally superior to other therapies such as psychotherapy, antidepressants, exercise or light therapy alone after 5-7 days. For RCTs, chronotherapy was favoured (Hedge's g = 0.62, 95% CI 0.23-1.01) compared to control treatments such as antidepressants and exercise. 33.0% of patients were responders after 5-7 days in the chronotherapy group and 1.5% of patients in the control condition (OR = 7.58, 95% CI 2.03-28.28). For the case series, large effect sizes were found by 5-7 days (g = 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.07). In the case series, 61.6% of patients were classed as responders.

LIMITATIONS

The number of RCTs included in this meta-analysis was small, and the potential for risk of bias could not be ascertained accurately. One specific limitation is that studies nearly all included in-patients and the results may not be generalisable to out-patients, and nearly all the subjects lacked credibility ratings before receiving treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronotherapy appears to be effective and well-tolerated in depressed patients. Nevertheless, further clinical and cost effectiveness studies are needed.

A 6-day combined wake and light therapy trial for unipolar depression

BACKGROUND

There are a dozen studies on double or triple chronotherapy in depression (sleep deprivation [wake therapy] + light therapy + sleep advance/stabilization). We investigated efficacy and feasibility of a modified triple chronotherapy protocol.

METHODS

Thirty-five hospitalized patients with moderately severe non-seasonal depressive disorder, mostly free from antidepressants, underwent a 6-day protocol consisting of partial sleep deprivation late in the second half of the night (from 4:00 to 8:00) in a light therapy room (blue-enhanced white light increased hourly from 600→1300→2200→2800 lx) alternating with recovery nights with morning light treatment from 7:00 to 8:00. Patients were randomized to wear glasses with no filter (clear, N = 19) or filtering blue wavelength (orange-appearance, light intensity diminution by ∼70%, N = 16) during the treatments. Sleep was targeted to be shifted at least 1 h earlier. Depression was scored using HDRS-17 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) and BDI-II (Beck Depression Inventory-II) - before and after the 6-days treatment, HDRS-6-SR - daily, and visual analogue scales (VAS) for mood and energy - several times every day.

RESULTS

Depression levels significantly declined following the first night and after 6-days treatment, with no difference between white and orange lights. Nevertheless, some superiority of white light emerged with respect to response rate (mood VAS), immediate effect during the 4-h treatment sessions (energy VAS), and expected treatment outcomes. All patients successfully advanced bedtime/wake-up (by 30-40 minutes) and resisted naps during daytime.

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified triple chronotherapy was well tolerated and improved depression. Light spectrum/intensity plays some role in the response.

Does early response predict subsequent remission in bipolar depression treated with repeated sleep deprivation combined with light therapy and lithium?

BACKGROUND

The combination of three cycles of sleep deprivation (SD), light therapy (LT), and lithium has recently been proposed as a possible first-line treatment for bipolar depression. However, it is unclear whether early improvement predicts final response/remission in bipolar depression treated with this regimen.

METHOD

We studied 220 consecutively admitted inpatients with a major depressive episode in the course of bipolar disorder. The relation between response to first SD and response/remission at the end of the treatment (day 6) was analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Severity of depression was rated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Clinical response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in HDRS scores, and remission was defined as an HDRS score of ≤7.

RESULTS

Among the 217 completers, 67.7% showed response and 54.4% reached remission at the end of the treatment. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that response after first recovery sleep (day 2) predicted final response and remission at the end of the treatment with high odds ratios (10.9 for response and 8.2 for remission); however, response immediately after the first SD (day 1) did not predict final response or remission.

LIMITATIONS

Whether our results can be generalized to unipolar depression remains uncertain.

CONCLUSION

Clinical status after first recovery sleep is a strong predictor of successful final outcome in patients with bipolar depression treated with the combination of repeated SD, LT, and lithium. Recovery sleep may play a role in inducing the antidepressant effect associated with the success of treatment.

Antidepressant chronotherapeutics in a group of drug free outpatients

The combination of Total Sleep Deprivation (TSD) and Light Therapy (LT) has been shown to prevent the early relapses characterizing response to TSD. Despite their proved efficacy, TSD and LT are still far from being considered standard therapy in the inpatient units and no study has assessed their efficacy and feasibility in outpatient settings. We studied 27 drug-free out-patients affected by Major Depression, divided in 7 groups according to the date of the wake night. Patients were administered one night of TSD and received LT during consecutive mornings following a predictive algorithm based on Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire scores. Severity of depression was rated on Back Depression Inventory Scale (BDI) at baseline, one week and three months after the end of treatment. BDI scores significantly decreased during treatment with no difference between the seven consecutively treated groups of patients. Significant differences in BDI scores were confirmed between the baseline and both one week and three months after the end of treatment. TSD and LT caused a significant amelioration of depressive symptoms in an outpatient setting. Similar effects were observed in seven independent groups, suggesting that there is repeatability in findings. Chronotherapeutics confirmed their efficacy in the treatment of depression.

Sleep deprivation therapy for depression

Sleep deprivation (SD) is the most widely documented rapid-onset antidepressant therapy, targeting the broadly defined depressive syndrome. Although SD responses are transient, its effects can be sustained by concomitant medications (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lithium) and circadian-related interventions (e.g., bright light and sleep phase advance). Thus, considering its safety, this technique can now be considered among the first-line antidepressant treatment strategies for patients affected by mood disorders. SD is a complex intervention and it should be considered multi-target in nature. Thus, the mechanisms explaining its antidepressant effect can be looked for on many levels, involving not only monoaminergic mechanisms but also sleep homeostatic and circadian mechanisms, glutamatergic mechanisms and synaptic plasticity.

Total sleep deprivation followed by sleep phase advance and bright light therapy in drug-resistant mood disorders

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant depression is a major therapeutic issue in psychiatry and the development of non-drug therapies that treat drug-resistant depression is required. Sleep deprivation (SD) is a non-drug treatment classified as a form of chronotherapy in addition to bright light therapy (BLT) and sleep phase advance (SPA). Combined chronotherapy is hypothesized to improve drug-resistant depression. In this study, we investigated the benefits of total sleep deprivation (TSD) followed by SPA and BLT in drug-resistant depression alongside ongoing antidepressant medication and observed the added effectiveness of the combined chronotherapy.

METHODS

Thirteen drug-resistant inpatients affected by a major depressive episode were studied. They were treated by TSD followed by SPA (three days) and BLT (five days) with ongoing drug treatment. Effectiveness was rated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) over 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Significant improvements of depressive symptoms were observed in both objective mood ratings (HAM-D) and subjective mood ratings (SDS and VAS). Eight out of 13 patients maintained this responsiveness (50% or greater changes in HAM-D) across the study period. Moreover, no patients dropped out of the combined chronotherapy procedure.

LIMITATIONS

The study did not have a placebo group, and more subjects may be needed.

CONCLUSION

The trial of combined chronotherapy successfully induced rapid improvement in depressive symptoms in drug-resistant patients without early relapse or obvious side effects.

Rapid-acting antidepressant strategies: mechanisms of action

Current antidepressants are ineffective in many depressed patients. Thus there is an urgent need to develop treatment strategies which have significantly faster response, can be sustained and have minimal side-effects. This paper reviews clinical data, potential biomarkers, mechanisms of action and future research directions for two proven strategies that produce marked improvement in severe depressive symptoms within 48 h, ketamine and sleep deprivation therapy (SDT). These treatments provide unequivocal evidence that the depressive process can be rapidly reversed in a subgroup of patients. Seventeen ketamine studies in over 150 patients showed a rapid response. Low-dose intravenous ketamine produced mild psychotomimetic effects but response has not been effectively sustained. SDT has been investigated in over 60 studies with a 40-60% response rate within 48 h. Although SDT is often used in Europe to initiate a rapid response, it is less utilized within the USA, in part, because it has a short duration when administered alone. We review data concerning chronotherapeutic strategies of bright-light therapy (BLT) and sleep-phase advance (SPA) which successfully sustain the antidepressant efficacy of SDT. Evidence is further discussed that a significant group of mood disorders have abnormal circadian rhythms which are known to be controlled by clock genes. It is hypothesized that chronotherapeutic manipulations can reset clock genes and thus, abnormalities in circadian rhythms. Further findings are reviewed that ketamine, in addition to its role as an NMDA antagonist, can also alter circadian rhythms. Thus, ketamine may share a critical mechanism with SDT.

Sleep deprivation in mood disorders

Growing clinical evidence in support of the efficacy and safety of sleep deprivation (SD), and its biological mechanisms of action suggest that this technique can now be included among the first-line antidepressant treatment strategies for mood disorders. SD targets the broadly defined depressive syndrome, and can be administered according to several different treatment schedules: total versus partial, single versus repeated, alone or combined with antidepressant drugs, mood stabilizers, or other chronotherapeutic techniques, such as light therapy and sleep phase advance. The present review focuses on clinical evidence about the place of SD in therapy, its indications, dosage and timing of the therapeutic wake, interactions with other treatments, precautions and contraindications, adverse reactions, mechanism of action, and comparative efficacy, with the aim of providing the clinical psychiatrist with an updated, concise guide to its application.

Chronotherapeutics in a psychiatric ward

Psychiatric chronotherapeutics is the controlled exposure to environmental stimuli that act on biological rhythms in order to achieve therapeutic effects in the treatment of psychiatric conditions. In recent years some techniques (mainly light therapy and sleep deprivation) have passed the experimental developmental phase and reached the status of powerful and affordable clinical interventions for everyday clinical treatment of depressed patients. These techniques target the same brain neurotransmitter systems and the same brain areas as do antidepressant drugs, and should be administered under careful medical supervision. Their effects are rapid and transient, but can be stabilised by combining techniques among themselves or together with common drug treatments. Antidepressant chronotherapeutics target the broadly defined depressive syndrome, with response and relapse rates similar to those obtained with antidepressant drugs, and good results are obtained even in difficult-to-treat conditions such as bipolar depression. Chronotherapeutics offer a benign alternative to more radical treatments of depression for the treatment of severe depression in psychiatric wards, but with the advantage of rapidity of onset.

Light therapy for non-seasonal depression

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of light therapy for non-seasonal depression has been studied without any consensus on its efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate clinical effects of bright light therapy in comparison to the inactive placebo treatment for non-seasonal depression.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Depression Anxiety & Neurosis Controlled Trials register (CCDANCTR January 2003), comprising the results of searches of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1966 -), EMBASE (1980 -), CINAHL (1982 -), LILACS (1982 -), National Research Register, PsycINFO/PsycLIT (1974 -), PSYNDEX (1977 -), and SIGLE (1982 - ) using the group search strategy and the following terms: #30 = phototherapy or ("light therapy" or light-therapy). We also sought trials from conference proceedings and references of included papers, and contacted the first author of each study as well as leading researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing bright light with inactive placebo treatments for non-seasonal depression.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted and quality assessment was made independently by two reviewers. The authors were contacted to obtain additional information.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies (49 reports) were included in the review. Most of the studies applied bright light as adjunctive treatment to drug therapy, sleep deprivation, or both. In general, the quality of reporting was poor, and many reviews did not report adverse effects systematically. The treatment response in the bright light group was better than in the control treatment group, but did not reach statistical significance. The result was mainly based on studies of less than 8 days of treatment. The response to bright light was significantly better than to control treatment in high-quality studies (standardized mean difference (SMD) -0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.50 to -0.31), in studies applying morning light treatment (SMD -0.38, CI -0.62 to -0.14), and in sleep deprivation responders (SMD -1.02, CI -1.60 to -0.45). Hypomania was more common in the bright light group compared to the control treatment group (risk ratio 4.91, CI 1.66 to 14.46, number needed to harm 8, CI 5 to 20). Twenty studies (49 reports) were included in the review. Most of the studies applied bright light as adjunctive treatment to drug therapy, sleep deprivation, or both. Treatment

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

For patients suffering from non-seasonal depression, bright light therapy offers modest though promising antidepressive efficacy, especially when administered during the first week of treatment, in the morning, and as an adjunctive treatment to sleep deprivation responders. Hypomania as a potential adverse effect needs to be considered. Due to limited data and heterogeneity of studies these results need to be interpreted with caution.

Antidepressant effects of light therapy combined with sleep deprivation are influenced by a functional polymorphism within the promoter of the serotonin transporter gene

BACKGROUND

A functional polymorphism within the promoter of the serotonin transporter has been shown to influence the antidepressant response to serotonergic drug treatments and to total sleep deprivation (TSD). The short-term relapse that follows acute response to TSD has been successfully prevented by combining TSD with light therapy. The mechanism of action of this combined treatment is unknown.

METHODS

We tested the hypothesis that allelic variation of the serotonin transporter (5-HTT) linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) could influence the response to the combination of light therapy and TSD. Twenty-two bipolar depressed inpatients were administered a night of TSD combined with 30 min light therapy given during the TSD night and in the morning after recovery sleep. 5-HTTLPR was genotyped using polymerase chain reaction techniques. Changes in perceived mood were rated on a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Light therapy sustained the effect of TSD. The effect was more marked in homozygotes for the long variant of 5-HTTLPR than in heterozygotes and homozygotes for the short variant.

CONCLUSIONS

The influence of 5-HTTLPR on response to the combination of TSD and light therapy is similar to that observed on response to TSD and serotonergic drug treatments.

Sleep deprivation as a predictor of response to light therapy in major depression

BACKGROUND

While the majority of depressed patients benefit from total sleep deprivation (TSD), light therapy is regarded as a first-line treatment only for seasonal affective disorder (SAD). The results of light therapy in nonseasonal major depressive disorder have been non-conclusive. We examined the correlation of TSD response and light therapy response in major depressed patients.

METHODS

40 inpatients with major depressive disorder (seven with seasonal pattern, 33 without seasonal pattern) were deprived of a night's sleep. The TSD responders, as well as the TSD nonresponders, were randomly assigned to receive adjunct light therapy either with bright white light (2500 lux) or dim red light (50 lux) during 2 weeks beginning on the third day after TSD.

RESULTS

The 20 TSD responders improved significantly better under the light therapy than the 20 TSD nonresponders (according to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the self-rating depression scale Bf-S; v. Zerssen).

LIMITATIONS

No significant difference could be found between the two light intensities. Since the patients were additionally treated with medication an interaction with the two adjunctive therapies cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that a positive TSD response in major depressed patients can be predicative of beneficial outcome of subsequent light therapy.

Bright light therapy stabilizes the antidepressant effect of partial sleep deprivation

Partial sleep deprivation (PSD) results in a pronounced decrease of depressive symptoms in the majority of patients with major depressive disorder. Generally this acute antidepressant effect is not stable, relapse usually occurs after one night of recovery sleep. We therefore studied whether light therapy, beginning in the morning after PSD, is able to prevent the relapse after sleep deprivation, using a controlled, balanced, parallel design. All patients received an antidepressant medication, which was kept constant before and during the study period. Fourteen of 20 patients (70%) showed a reduction of at least 40% in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) in the morning after PSD and were classified as PSD responders. Responders as well as nonresponders were randomly assigned to receive either bright light (BL/3000 lux) or dim light (DL/100 lux) therapy during the following 6 days after PSD. In the responder group BL therapy prevented significantly (p = 0.005) the relapse after the next night of sleep and prolonged significantly (p = 0.011) the antidepressant effects of PSD up to 7 days. In contrast, patients in the DL condition relapsed after the recovery night and showed no further improvement of the depressive syndrome after 1 week of DL therapy. PSD nonresponders did not benefit from light treatment. These findings indicate that BL therapy might be efficacious to prevent relapse after PSD.

The relationship between tiredness prior to sleep deprivation and the antidepressant response to sleep deprivation in depression

Recently it was hypothesized that the antidepressant response to total sleep deprivation (SD) results from a disinhibition process induced by the increase of tiredness in the course of SD. In the present study, the role of tiredness in the antidepressant response to SD is further investigated. Seventy-two depressed patients scored subjective tiredness and depressed mood three times daily (in the morning, afternoon, and evening) on the days preceding and following SD. It was found that averaged tiredness on the day prior to SD was related to the SD response, when the severity of depression prior to SD had been held statistically constant. Also, when both severity of depression and diurnal variation of mood prior to SD were partialed out, tiredness showed a positive correlation with the SD response: patients who reported a relatively low degree of tiredness on the day preceding SD improved by SD. This result suggests that tiredness has an influence on SD effects, and that this influence is independent from that of the severity of depression. The findings are in accordance with current ideas on the role of tiredness as a mediating factor in the induction of the therapeutic effects of SD.

Sleep deprivation accelerates the response to nortriptyline

1. The authors examined the effect of total sleep deprivation (SD) in combination with nortriptyline in 20 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients underwent a 36-hour SD procedure followed by nortriptyline started on the evening after SD, with ratings for two weeks. 2. Eleven (55%) patients were responders; they showed a rapid and sustained remission after SD, whereas non-responders demonstrated the delayed results expected with nortriptyline. 3. High initial depression scores and absence of depersonalization were associated with response to SD, while being female and middle insomnia were associated with response to the combined regimen. 4. The combination of SD with antidepressants proves to be an effective and safe treatment modality.

Self-rated arousal concurrent with the antidepressant response to total sleep deprivation of patients with a major depressive disorder: a disinhibition hypothesis

In view of the opposing theories regarding the arousing or de-arousing action of total sleep deprivation (TSD) in producing antidepressant effects, 23 patients with a major depressive disorder were deprived of a night's sleep twice weekly for two weeks, and self-rated their condition 38 times using von Zerssen's scale for depression and, concurrently, Thayer's Activation Deactivation Adjective Check List (AD ACL). Transient relief of depression after TSD, indicated by eight patients, was mimicked by their AD ACL scores, which revealed the same underlying factors as were found in Thayer's studies. TSD appears to be simultaneously arousing (giving more energy) and de-arousing (leading to less tension), while this response takes place against a background of increased tiredness/sleepiness. It is argued that TSD sets off a psychological disinhibition process on the basis of cerebral fatigue; in particular the prefrontal (orbital?) areas of the cerebral cortex may be implicated, possibly in relation to a dampening down of subcortical arousal systems.

Prediction of the antidepressant response to total sleep deprivation by diurnal variation of mood

The relationship between diurnal variation of mood and response to total sleep deprivation (TSD) was investigated in 131 depressed patients. This response was related to (1) the diurnal variation on the day before TSD as assessed by self-ratings of mood, and (2) the propensity to produce diurnal variations (the "diurnality") as assessed by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Three types of diurnality are distinguished: morning type (the propensity to feel better in the morning), evening type (the propensity to feel better in the evening), and a nondiurnal type. The results show that diurnality does predict the mood response to TSD. The direction of diurnality is decisive: patients who have the propensity to feel better in the evening benefit more from TSD than other patients.