Nomenclature and classification of receptors and binding sites: The need for harmony

Serotonin receptors in brain revisited

In the early 1980's, the dispute on the existence of a multiplicity of receptors for neurotransmitter was at its height. Several subtypes of serotonin (5-HT) receptors were proposed on the basis of radioligand binding assays. In order to provide further support to the existence of these receptors we performed quantitative autoradiographic mapping of the binding of several ligands for the 5-HT1 receptor labeling the subtypes 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1C, and characterized pharmacologically these different receptors. The results demonstrated differential localization of the subtypes of 5-HT1 receptors indicating that they were expressed by different cell populations, probably neurons, in the brain and further supporting their reality. Shortly afterwards, the cloning of the genes coding for these 5-HT receptors, and many others, ended the dispute by demonstrating that they were different proteins. The advent of Molecular Biology provided new methodologies for the study of the chemical and molecular anatomy of 5-HT receptors in brain, by visualizing cells expressing their mRNA by in situ hybridization and showed that the family of mammalian 5-HT receptors has 14 members, a figure much larger than ever suspected at that time.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE ABSTRACT

QUANTITATIVE AUTORADIOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF SEROTONIN RECEPTORS IN THE RAT BRAIN. I. SEROTONIN-1 RECEPTORS: The distribution of serotonin-1 (5-HT1) receptors in the rat brain was studied by light microscopic quantitative autoradiography. Receptors were labeled with [(3)H]serotonin (5-[(3)H]HT), 8-hydroxy-2-[H-dipropylamino-(3)H]tetralin (8-OH-[(3)H]DPAT), [(3)H]LSD and [(3)H]mesulergine, and the densities quantified by microdensitometry with the aid of a computer-assisted image-analysis system. Competition experiments for 5-[(3)H]HT binding by several serotonin-1 agonizts led to the identification of brain areas enriched in each one of the three subtypes of 5-HT1 recognition sites already described (5-HT1A, 5-HT1B, 5-HT1C). The existence of these׳selective׳ areas allowed a detailed pharmacological characterization of these sites to be made in a more precise manner than has been attained in membrane-binding studies. While 5-[(3)H]HT labeled with nanomolar affinity all the 5-HT1 subtypes, the other (3)H-labeled ligands labeled selectively 5-HT1A (8-OH-[(3)H]DPAT), 5-HT1C ([(3)H]mesulergine) and both of them ([(3)H]LSD). Very high concentrations of 5-HT1 receptors were localized in the choroid plexus, lateroseptal nucleus, globus pallidus and ventral pallidum, dentate gyrus, dorsal subiculum, olivary pretectal nucleus, substantia nigra, reticular and external layer of the entorhinal cortex. The different fields of the hippocampus (CA1-CA4), some nuclei of the amygdaloid complex, the hypothalamic nuclei and the dorsal raphé, among others, also presented high concentrations of sites. Areas containing intermediate densities of 5-HT1 receptors included the claustrum, olfactory tubercle, accumbens, central gray and lateral cerebellar nucleus. The nucleus caudate-putamen and the cortex, at the different levels studied, presented receptor densities ranging from intermediate to low. Finally, in other brain areas-pons, medulla, and spinal cord-only low or very low concentrations of 5-HT1 receptors were found. From the areas strongly enriched in 5-HT1 sites, dentate gyrus and septal nucleus contained 5-HT1A sites, while globus pallidus, dorsal subiculum, substantia nigra and olivary pretectal nucleus were enriched in 5-HT1B. The sites in the choroid plexus, which presented the highest density of receptors in the rat brain, were of the 5-HT1C subtype. The distribution of 5-HT1 receptors reported here is discussed in correlation with the distribution of serotoninergic neurons and fibers, the related anatomical pathways and the effects which appear to be mediated by these sites. © 1985.This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI:50th Anniversary Issue. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI:50th Anniversary Issue.

Receptor nomenclature guidelines

Receptors are typically characterized via two distinct approaches: (1) the identification and pharmacological characterization of a receptor-mediated response using classical pharmacological and/or radioligand approaches in tissues and animal models using selective agonist and antagonist ligands, and; (2) the cloning and expression of proteins with structural homology to known receptors, the function of which is subsequently established by studying the structure activity relationship (SAR) of receptor-mediated responses. An additional means to characterize receptors proceeded, and evolved, with the structural approach, namely classification in terms of signal transduction mechanisms. The International Union of Pharmacology (IUPHAR) created guidelines and selected working groups for each receptor family to establish a common nomenclature system. Reports from those groups that have reached some degree of consensus have been summarized in this appendix.

Pharmacological receptors: the need for a compendium of classification, nomenclature and structure

In an attempt to contain the chaos of receptor nomenclature, the supplement distributed with this issue of TiPS catalogues cell surface receptors and their subtypes according to the most commonly used nomenclature and describes them in pharmacological, biochemical and molecular terms. This reporting of the status quo will be an invaluable aid to communication, but all scientists (not just pharmacologists) working on receptors would agree that a radical and rational classification of receptors also needs to be initiated. In this article, Jack Peter Green proposes a system of (and mechanism for) classification that should satisfy both the 'taxonomic realists' and the 'taxonomic skeptics'.

Characterization of the rabbit aorta endothelium-dependent cholinergic receptor by agonist equipotent molar doses

The endothelium-dependent acetylcholine, metacholine, carbachol, betanechol, and furtrethonium relaxation values have been measured in vitro for the rabbit aorta, in presence of a high concentration of hexamethonium. The produced EPMR values complete the values that were obtained in a previous experiment under analogous conditions for rat bladder, ileum, iris, stomach, and trachea preparations. The complete set was analyzed by new statistical techniques of data analysis and display, which are both simpler and more precise than the statistical modeling techniques used by us in the past. This has led to new results concerning the clustering of drugs and of receptors, as well as to a characterization of the endothelium receptor.