On leaving drunks alone

Novelty causes time-dependent retrograde amnesia for one-trial avoidance in rats through NMDA receptor- and CaMKII-dependent mechanisms in the hippocampus

Exposure to a novel environment (an open field) for 2 min, 1 h after one-trial inhibitory avoidance training, hindered memory of the avoidance task measured 24 h later. The effect was seen regardless of the intensity of the avoidance training footshock. The effect was not seen if the exposure to novelty was carried out 5 min before, or 6 h after, the avoidance training, or if the animals did not perceive the open field as new and react accordingly. The amnesic effect of the novelty presented 1 h after avoidance training was blocked by the intrahippocampal infusion of D-2-amino-5-phosphono-pentanoic acid (AP5, 25 nmoles per side) or 1-(N, O-bis-[5-isoquinolinylsulphonyl]-N-methyl-L-tyrosyl)-4- phenylpiperazine (KN62, 100 micromoles per side) but not by that of C32H25N3O6 (KT5720, 90 micromoles per side) given 5 min before the novelty. In the open field there was habituation, measured by the decrease in exploration between the first and second minute. AP5 and KN62 impaired this habituation, but not KT5720. Exploration of the open field was similar in the groups exposed to the avoidance task 5 min later, or 1 h or 6 h before. Therefore, there was no reciprocity between the effect of the two tasks: novelty was amnesic for the one-trial avoidance task, but the opposite was not true. The amnesic effect of novelty appears to rely on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor- and calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII)-dependent, but not on PKA-dependent, aspects of its habituation learning.

Effects of post-training ethanol and group housing upon memory of an appetitive task in mice

It has been shown that post-training ethanol's facilitating effects upon memory disappeared if the mice were kept isolated after training. Since ethanol-treated mice were attacked by their cagemates, it has been hypothesized that the improved retention induced by ethanol resulted from an interaction between ethanol and group housing which added aversive information to training. To investigate the correctness of this interpretation, ethanol effects upon memory of an appetitive task were studied. C57BL/6J mice (isolated the day before training) were individually trained to find a cheese pellet placed in a corner of an open-field. Mice were injected intraperitoneally immediately after training with saline, 0.5, 1.5, or 2.0 g/kg of ethanol. They were then returned to their home cage and left alone, with another mouse, or with five other mice for 2 h after training. All mice were tested 24 h later for retention. Reductions in the number of pellet approaches or in the latency to eat the pellet were taken as measures of learning. Post-training ethanol disrupted retention of the appetitive task in a dose-related manner. Moreover disruption was greater in mice group housed after training. The results support the hypothesis that ethanol's post-training facilitating effects upon aversive memory may be due to added aversive information to the stimulus complex, rather than, or in addition, to enhanced storage of memory traces.

Amnesia induced by short-term treatment with ethanol: attenuation by pretest oxotremorine

CD-1 mice were administered a series of tones paired with footshock in the closed arm of a Y maze. On a test session 8 days later the animals were tested for retention of the conditioned emotional response (CER). On the 2-min test session, the three arms of the maze were open and the number of entries into the arms was counted. Retention of the CER was measured by the decrease in the number of entries in comparison with animals trained with no footshock. Starting 24 hr after training, and continuing for the 7 days between training and testing, the animals in different groups received a daily IP injection of saline, 3.6 g/kg of ethanol, 150 micrograms/kg of the cholinergic muscarinic agonist oxotremorine, or ethanol plus oxotremorine. Retention was evaluated 24 hr after the last injection. Ethanol reduced retention of the conditioned emotional response. This effect was attenuated by oxotremorine (150 micrograms/kg) given IP 6 min prior to testing, but not by the same dose of oxotremorine given daily together with the ethanol treatment. Oxotremorine injections administered prior to the retention test also enhanced the retention performance of the control group. Daily oxotremorine administration had no effect. These findings suggest that ethanol weakened retention of the conditioned emotional response, that this effect was unrelated to acquisition or consolidation, and that the deleterious effect of the ethanol treatment can be attenuated by oxotremorine administered prior to the retention test.

Different forms of post-training memory processing

Memories are not acquired in their definitive form, but can be considerably modified in the period that follows after acquisition, both quali- and quantitatively. This may happen either by a process of consolidation or strengthening of each memory trace or by the incorporation of further information to each experience. This further information may be provided by the action of drugs, including that of endogenous substances released by each training experience, and by the addition of information provided by other tasks or events. Evidence in favor of the existence of these various post-training processes, and of their importance for memory formation, is discussed. All of these processes are time dependent, all may depend on stimulus aftereffects, each is differently affected by drugs given in the post-training period, and all may interact with each other.