Ultrafiltration: an efficient second step for hepatitis A virus and poliovirus concentration

Primary concentration - The critical step in implementing the wastewater based epidemiology for the COVID-19 pandemic: A mini-review

The recent outbreak of a novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has posed a significant global public health threat and caused dramatic social and economic disruptions. A new research direction is attracting a significant amount of attention in the academic community of environmental sciences and engineering, in which rapid community-level monitoring could be achieved by applying the methodology of wastewater based epidemiology (WBE). Given the fact that the development of a mass balance on the total number of viral RNA copies in wastewater samples and the infected stool specimens is the heart of WBE, the result of the quantitative RNA detection in wastewater has to be highly sensitive, accurate, and reliable. Thus, applying effective concentration methods before the subsequent RNA extraction and RT-qPCR detection is a must-have procedure for the WBE. This review provides new insights into the primary concentration methods that have been adopted by the eighteen recently reported COVID-19 wastewater detection studies, along with a brief discussion of the mechanisms of the most commonly used virus concentration methods, including the PEG-based separation, electrostatically charged membrane filtration, and ultrafiltration. In the end, two easy and well-proven concentration strategies are recommended as below, aiming to maximize the practical significance and operational effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 virus concentration from wastewater samples.

Critical issues in application of molecular methods to environmental virology

Waterborne diseases have significant public health and socioeconomic implications worldwide. Many viral pathogens are commonly associated with water-related diseases, namely enteric viruses. Also, novel recently discovered human-associated viruses have been shown to be a causative agent of gastroenteritis or other clinical symptoms. A wide range of analytical methods is available for virus detection in environmental water samples. Viral isolation is historically carried out via propagation on permissive cell lines; however, some enteric viruses are difficult or not able to propagate on existing cell lines. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) screening of viral nucleic acid is routinely used to investigate virus contamination in water due to the high sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, the introduction of metagenomic approaches into environmental virology has facilitated the discovery of viruses that cannot be grown in cell culture. This review (i) highlights the applications of molecular techniques in environmental virology such as PCR and its modifications to overcome the critical issues associated with the inability to discriminate between infectious viruses and nonviable viruses, (ii) outlines the strengths and weaknesses of Nucleic Acid Sequence Based Amplification (NASBA) and microarray, (iii) discusses the role of digital PCR as an emerging water quality monitoring assay and its advantages over qPCR, (iv) addresses the viral metagenomics in terms of detecting emerging viral pathogens and diversity in aquatic environment. Indeed, there are many challenges for selecting methods to detect classic and emerging viruses in environmental samples. While the existing techniques have revealed the importance and diversity of viruses in the water environment, further developments are necessary to enable more rapid and accurate methodologies for viral water quality monitoring and regulation.

Concentration and recovery of viruses from water: a comprehensive review

Enteric viruses are a cause of waterborne disease worldwide, and low numbers in drinking water can present a significant risk of infection. Because the numbers are often quite low, large volumes (100-1,000 L) of water are usually processed. The VIRADEL method using microporous filters is most commonly used today for this purpose. Negatively charged filters require the addition of multivalent salts and acidification of the water sample to effect virus adsorption, which can make large-volume sampling difficult. Positively charged filters require no preconditioning of samples, and are able to concentrate viruses from water over a greater pH range than electronegative filters. The most widely used electropositive filter is the Virosorb 1MDS; however, the Environmental Protection Agency has added the positively charged NanoCeram filters to their proposed Method 1615. Ultrafilters concentrate viruses based on size exclusion rather than electrokinetics, but are impractical for field sampling or processing of turbid water. Elution (recovery) of viruses from filters following concentration is performed with organic (e.g., beef extract) or inorganic solutions (e.g., sodium polyphosphates). Eluates are then reconcentrated to decrease the sample volume to enhance detection methods (e.g., cell culture infectivity assays and molecular detection techniques). While the majority of available filters have demonstrated high virus retention efficiencies, the methods to elute and reconcentrate viruses have met with varying degrees of success due to the biological variability of viruses present in water.

Evaluation of various methods for recovering human norovirus and murine norovirus from vegetables and ham

We evaluated and optimized each step in an analytical method for detecting norovirus from various foods. We characterized the buffers needed for eluting norovirus from foods such as ham and lettuce. Two different concentration methods, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and hollow fiber ultrafiltration (HUF), were compared using both murine norovirus (MNV) and human norovirus (HuNoV). For PEG precipitation, an elution buffer containing 3% beef extract (pH 7.1) was more suitable than 0.05 M glycine plus 0.14 M NaCl (pH 7.5), and the recovery efficiency increased with increasing molecular weight of PEG. To determine the optimal buffer for concentrating norovirus by HUF, glycine buffers with different pH values and ionic strengths were examined as elution buffers. Overall, HUF was more efficient for norovirus recovery than was PEG precipitation. Because there was a significant positive correlation between MNV and HuNoV results, MNV could be a useful surrogate for detecting HuNoV in foods.

Hollow-fiber ultrafiltration for the concentration and simultaneous recovery of multiple pathogens in contaminated foods

We investigated the possibility of using hollow-fiber ultrafiltration (HUF) for the simultaneous recovery of multiple microorganisms in food samples. MS2 bacteriophage, E. coli, Bacillus subtilis spores, and murine norovirus (MNV) were each inoculated into 5 liters of either distilled water (DW) or glycine elution buffer and then concentrated using hollow-fiber polysulfone ultrafilters. The resulting concentrates were further analyzed by either cultivation or TaqMan real-time reverse transcription PCR assay. The overall average recovery rates were 7.1% in DW and 17.1% in glycine elution buffer. When the virus, vegetative bacteria, and bacterial spores were simultaneously inoculated into DW, glycine, or Tris-HCl elution buffers, on average 16.8% of inoculated microorganisms were recovered by HUF. The addition of 3% beef extract blocking buffer to HUF increased the total recovery rate to 46.1%, with incremental recovery rates increasing sharply for B. subtilis spores and MNV. Use of HUF resulted in E. coli recovery rates of 68.0% on lettuce and 66.2% on ham and MNV recovery rates of 1.5% on lettuce and 5.8% on ham. Our study demonstrates that HUF can be effective at simultaneously recovering and concentrating diverse bacterial and viral pathogens from foods.

Chapter 9 The Detection of Waterborne Viruses

Viruses in water are usually present in concentrations too low for detection by direct analysis. Virological investigation of water samples is always a multi-stage process involving concentration of viruses present followed by an appropriate detection procedure. There are several approaches to detection of viruses. Part or all of the concentrate may be inoculated into cell cultures to detect infectious cytopathogenic virus, and if this is done in a quantitative fashion the virus can be enumerated, the count being reported as plaque-forming units, the tissue culture infectious dose, or most probable number units. The virus may be isolated and identified from the cell cultures. Viruses that multiply without producing an identifiable cytopathic effect in culture may sometimes be detected by immunoperoxidase or immunofluorescence staining. The concentrate may also be analyzed by molecular biological procedures (usually polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or real-time-PCR). The problem then is that such techniques do not usually detect the infectious virus, and novel approaches have been made recently to meet this challenge.

Comparative study of four extraction methods for enterovirus recovery from wastewater and sewage sludge

This study investigated four methods for the recovery of enteroviruses from sterilized raw wastewater, activated sludge, thickened sludge and treated wastewater, inoculated with Echovirus 11, Gregory prototype. The adsorption-elution method recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was better for Echovirus 11 recovery than a sonication method, a modified EPA method and a membrane adsorption elution method since it resulted in the highest detection levels by cell culture and RT-PCR (Friedman's test, p<0.00041 and p=0.041, respectively).

Towards a unified system for detecting waterborne pathogens

Currently, there is no single method to collect, process, and analyze a water sample for all pathogenic microorganisms of interest. Some of the difficulties in developing a universal method include the physical differences between the major pathogen groups (viruses, bacteria, protozoa), efficiently concentrating large volume water samples to detect low target concentrations of certain pathogen groups, removing co-concentrated inhibitors from the sample, and standardizing a culture-independent endpoint detection method. Integrating the disparate technologies into a single, universal, simple method and detection system would represent a significant advance in public health and microbiological water quality analysis. Recent advances in sample collection, on-line sample processing and purification, and DNA microarray technologies may form the basis of a universal method to detect known and emerging waterborne pathogens. This review discusses some of the challenges in developing a universal pathogen detection method, current technology that may be employed to overcome these challenges, and the remaining needs for developing an integrated pathogen detection and monitoring system for source or finished water.

Efficient and predictable recovery of viruses from water by small scale ultrafiltration systems

Current methods to concentrate viruses from large volumes of water are prone to inconsistent results and are costly and complex procedurally. Ultrafiltration can utilize size exclusion rather than adsorption and (or) elution to concentrate viruses and, therefore, may offer greater flexibility in developing methods that can provide more consistent recoveries among different viruses and widely varying water conditions. Two small scale ultrafiltration systems (hollow fiber and tangential flow) were tested with a virus suspended in 2 L of reagent grade, tap, ground, or surface water. Three model viruses were used (bacteriophages PP7 and T1 and poliovirus) to compare and characterize the recovery of viruses with the two ultrafiltration systems. Pretreatment of the ultrafilters with blocking agents and the use of elution agents can serve to prevent viral adsorption to the filter surface or to elute bound virus and keep viral agents suspended in the retentate. The use of a blocking and elution step concentrated viruses (>60% recovery) from widely varying water qualities, including surface water, such that a single method can be used to efficiently concentrate viruses from all of the water types tested. Both ultrafiltration systems appear to be able to efficiently recover viruses; however, the hollow fiber systems provided slightly better results in the 2-L volumes tested.Key words: ultrafiltration, waterborne virus, poliovirus, enterovirus.

Concentration and detection of cryptosporidium oocysts in surface water samples by method 1622 using ultrafiltration and capsule filtration

The protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium parvum is known to occur widely in both source and drinking water and has caused waterborne outbreaks of gastroenteritis. To improve monitoring, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed method 1622 for isolation and detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water. Method 1622 is performance based and involves filtration, concentration, immunomagnetic separation, fluorescent-antibody staining and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counterstaining, and microscopic evaluation. The capsule filter system currently recommended for method 1622 was compared to a hollow-fiber ultrafilter system for primary concentration of C. parvum oocysts in seeded reagent water and untreated surface waters. Samples were otherwise processed according to method 1622. Rates of C. parvum oocyst recovery from seeded 10-liter volumes of reagent water in precision and recovery experiments with filter pairs were 42% (standard deviation [SD], 24%) and 46% (SD, 18%) for hollow-fiber ultrafilters and capsule filters, respectively. Mean oocyst recovery rates in experiments testing both filters on seeded surface water samples were 42% (SD, 27%) and 15% (SD, 12%) for hollow-fiber ultrafilters and capsule filters, respectively. Although C. parvum oocysts were recovered from surface waters by using the approved filter of method 1622, the recovery rates were significantly lower and more variable than those from reagent grade water. In contrast, the disposable hollow-fiber ultrafilter system was compatible with subsequent method 1622 processing steps, and it recovered C. parvum oocysts from seeded surface waters with significantly greater efficiency and reliability than the filter suggested for use in the version of method 1622 tested.

Exposure to enteroviruses and hepatitis A virus among divers in environmental waters in France, first biological and serological survey of a controlled cohort

An epidemiological study of hepatitis A and enteroviruses was conducted in a military diving training school, by evaluating the viral contamination of water using an ultrafiltration concentration technique, and assessing seroconversion and the presence of virus in stool specimens obtained from 109 divers and 48 controls. Three of 29 water specimens were positive for enterovirus by cell culture and 9 by molecular hybridization. There was little or no risk of virus infection during the training course (49 h exposure) because there was no significant difference between divers and controls for both viral isolation and seroconversion. However, a higher percentage of coxsackievirus B4 and B5 seropositive divers suggests that these were more exposed during previous water training. No hepatitis A virus (HAV) detection and no seroconversion to HAV was observed. The rate of HAV seropositive subjects was 17% in this 24.5-year-old population.

Hepatitis A virus identification in an outbreak by enzymatic amplification

From April 28th to May 22nd, 1987, the Medical Authority identified 13 cases (6 symptomatic cases) of hepatitis A (HA) in a school and in a college of Rome. The principal risk factor was determined to be "full-time presence at the State school and boarders at the college". The distribution of HA cases suggested a person to person contact; anti-hepatitis A virus IgM were identified in 12 out of 13 cases with high levels of transaminases. During the disease epidemic, water samples were taken from the well of the college for bacteriological and virological analyses. The water was classified as undrinkable due to the presence of 16 total coliforms/100 ml and 35 total bacteria count at 36 degrees C. Fecal coliforms, fecal streptococci and sulfite reducing clostridia were absent. Two water samples of 100 liters were collected and concentrated by adsorption-elution method on electropositive membranes or by ultrafiltration using a Millipore apparatus. Infectious Hepatitis A virus was only isolated from samples concentrated by adsorption-elution method on electropositive membranes using tissue culture methods and subsequently HA virus was identified by other traditional methods (Elisa and immunofluorescence). In contrast, PCR test performed on the concentrated samples, was positive only for the ultraconcentrated sample. The positivity of the PCR test confirmed the presence of the Hepatitis A virus in the well water.