Stránská R, Schuurman R, Nienhuis E, Goedegebuure IW, Polman M, Weel JF, Wertheim-Van Dillen PM, Berkhout RJM, van Loon AM. Survey of acyclovir-resistant herpes simplex virus in the Netherlands: prevalence and characterization.
J Clin Virol 2005;
32:7-18. [PMID:
15572000 DOI:
10.1016/j.jcv.2004.04.002]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 03/27/2004] [Accepted: 04/10/2004] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Widespread and frequent use of acyclovir (ACV) for treatment, suppressive therapy and prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections and its over the counter availability may be associated with emergence of HSV resistance.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the prevalence of ACV-resistant HSV isolates in different patient groups between 1999 and 2002 in the Netherlands.
STUDY DESIGN
A total of 542 isolates, 410 HSV-1 and 132 HSV-2, from 496 patients were screened for reduced susceptibility to ACV. A newly developed ELVIRA HSV screening assay was used that allowed a high throughput screening. The genotypic analysis of the HSV thymidine kinase gene was performed to identify resistance-associated mutations.
RESULTS
Thirteen isolates, 8 HSV-1 and 5 HSV-2, from 10 patients (2%) were found resistant to ACV. A single ACV-resistant strain was identified among isolates from 368 immunocompetent patients (0.27%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.007%-1.5%), whereas in nine isolates from 128 immunocompromised patients resistant HSV was identified (7%; 95% CI, 3.26%-12.93%). The highest frequency of ACV-resistant HSV was associated with bone marrow transplantation: four patients out of 28 (14.3%) shed resistant virus. In addition, resistant virus was obtained from two HIV-positive patients, one patient with a hematological malignancy and two patients on immunosuppressive drugs. Further testing showed that none of the isolates was resistant to foscarnet. Several new mutations were identified in the thymidine kinase gene of these resistant isolates, and their effect on ACV-resistance is discussed.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study shows that the prevalence of ACV resistance is low in immunocompetent patients (0.27%), whereas ACV-resistant HSV infections occur relatively frequently in immunocompromised patients (7%; P < 0.0001). This emphasizes the need for drug susceptibility monitoring of HSV infections in immunocompromised patients with persisting infections despite antiviral therapy.
Collapse