Effects of naloxone treatment on memory-enhancing properties of post-training administration of substance P

Neuromodulatory signaling in hippocampus-dependent memory retrieval

Considerable advances have been made toward understanding the molecular signaling events that underlie memory acquisition and consolidation. In contrast, less is known about memory retrieval, despite its necessity for utilizing learned information. This review focuses on neuromodulatory and intracellular signaling events that underlie memory retrieval mediated by the hippocampus, for which the most information is currently available. Among neuromodulators, adrenergic signaling is required for the retrieval of various types of hippocampus-dependent memory. Although they contribute to acquisition and/or consolidation, cholinergic and dopaminergic signaling are generally not required for retrieval. Interestingly, while not required for retrieval, serotonergic and opioid signaling may actually constrain memory retrieval. Roles for histamine and non-opioid neuropeptides are currently unclear but possible. A critical effector of adrenergic signaling in retrieval is reduction of the slow afterhyperpolarization mediated by β1 receptors, cyclic AMP, protein kinase A, Epac, and possibly ERK. In contrast, stress and glucocorticoids impair retrieval by decreasing cyclic AMP, mediated in part by the activation of β2 -adrenergic receptors. Clinically, alterations in neuromodulatory signaling and in memory retrieval occur in Alzheimer's disease, Down syndrome, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and recent evidence has begun to link changes in neuromodulatory signaling with effects on memory retrieval.

Facilitation of memory by peripheral administration of substance P

This report summarizes a recent series of experiments dealing with the effect of peripheral (i.p.) administration of SP on the learning of avoidance and habituation tasks. In summary, the results from these studies show that peripheral post-training SP administration in rats enhances memory in a dose- and time-dependent way. The effect of substance P on retention was observed across tasks with different response requirements and in the absence of explicit punishment. The memory-enhancing effects are long-lasting, until 21 days post-training, and are mediated, at least in part, via interactions with the endogenous opioid system. The mnemotropic effects of peripherally administered SP are sensitive to the functional integrity of the vagus, suggesting that the vagus nerve may be one pathway by which systemic SP influences memory storage processes in the brain. Furthermore, the data indicated that these effects seemed to be encoded by different SP sequences, the N-terminal SP1-7, but not the C-terminal hepta- and hexapeptide sequences being responsible for the memory-promoting effects. Taken together, these studies strongly suggest that SP may be considered to have memory-promoting effects.

Endogenous opiates: 1993

This paper is the sixteenth installment of our annual review of research concerning the opiate system. It is restricted to papers published during 1993 that concern the behavioral effects of the endogenous opiate peptides, and does not include papers dealing only with their analgesic properties. The specific topics this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic function; mental illness and mood; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical-related activity; general activity and locomotion; development; immunological responses; and other behaviors.