Mapping and regulation of the pifC promoter of the F plasmid

F exclusion of bacteriophage T7 occurs at the cell membrane

The F plasmid PifA protein, known to be the cause of F exclusion of bacteriophage T7, is shown to be a membrane-associated protein. No transmembrane domains of PifA were located. In contrast, T7 gp1.2 and gp10, the two phage proteins that trigger phage exclusion, are both soluble cytoplasmic proteins. The Escherichia coli FxsA protein, which, at higher concentrations than found in wild-type cells, protects T7 from exclusion, is shown to interact with PifA. FxsA is a polytopic membrane protein with four transmembrane segments and a long cytoplasmic C-terminal tail. This tail is not important in alleviating F exclusion and can be deleted; in contrast, the fourth transmembrane segment of FxsA is critical in allowing wild-type T7 to grow in the presence of F PifA. These data suggest that the primary event that triggers the exclusion process occurs at the cytoplasmic membrane and that FxsA sequesters PifA so that membrane damage is minimized.

Increased synthesis of an Escherichia coli membrane protein suppresses F exclusion of bacteriophage T7

Increased synthesis of the protein FxsA alleviates the exclusion of T7 in cells harboring the F plasmid. In contrast to wild-type or cells defective in fxsA, overexpression of fxsA+ allows T7 to form plaques at normal efficiency even though the burst size is reduced to about half that obtained on the isogenic F- strain. No defect in DNA synthesis was observed but late protein synthesis remains partially inhibited and a reduced level of cell leakiness, a prominent feature of F+ cells abortively infected by T7, persists. The FxsA protein is shown to be a cytoplasmic membrane protein. How T7 avoids exclusion by F in cells that exhibit increased levels of FxsA is discussed in terms of its membrane localization.

Both the fipA gene of pKM101 and the pifC gene of F inhibit conjugal transfer of RP1 by an effect on traG

The mechanisms by which gene products inhibit the conjugal transfer of IncP plasmids (e.g., RP1) have been little studied. We have isolated and characterized one such gene, fipA (624 nucleotides), from the SmaI (14.8 kb)-AatII (15.6 kb) region of pKM101(IncN). This gene, which is also conserved in other IncN plasmids, is transcribed in an anticlockwise direction, probably as part of a transfer operon that includes traHI. The FipA protein (24 kDa) appears to be cytoplasmic and, when expressed from a multicopy plasmid, retards the growth of Escherichia coli WP2. The mode of action of fipA was compared with that of the apparently unrelated pifC gene from F(IncFI). Both genes inhibit the transfer of IncPalpha and IncPbeta plasmids but to different degrees. They also inhibit the mobilization of RSF1010 (which requires the RP1 pilus genes and traG) but not of CloDF13 (which encodes a traG homolog). Evidence that traG was the specific target of inhibition was obtained in an artificial system in which cloned traG was used to enhance RSF1010 mobilization via the N pilus system. Such enhancement did not occur in the presence of fipA or pifC. The availability of an in vivo assay of PifC enabled us to show that F pif operon expression increased in cells carrying F'lac and traG, but only if the traG coding sequence was intact. This finding suggested that conjugal inhibition of RP1 was most likely due to a PifC-TraG protein interaction. On phenotypic grounds inhibition of traG by fipA is also likely to occur posttranscriptionally. Whether or not the selection of traG as the inhibition target is an evolutionary tactic to limit the spread of P plasmids, we anticipate that fipA and pifC will prove useful in further investigation of the conjugal roles of traG and its homologs.

Streptomycin- and rifampin-resistant mutants of Escherichia coli perturb F exclusion of bacteriophage T7 by affecting synthesis of the F plasmid protein PifA

Certain alleles of rpsL that confer resistance to the antibiotic streptomycin almost completely relieve F exclusion of bacteriophage T7. Introduction of a specific rpoB allele conferring resistance to rifampin into the rpsL strain restores the ability of the F-containing strain to exclude T7. This variation in the severity of F exclusion is reflected in the levels of the F-encoded inhibitor protein PifA: F'-containing cells that harbor specific rpsL alleles are phenotypically Pif-, but become Pif+ by the further acquisition of a specific rpoB allele. F-containing cells harboring the gyrA43(Ts) mutation also appear phenotypically Pif-, possibly because repression of the pif operon is enhanced by an altered DNA conformation in the gyrase mutant strain.

Purification and DNA binding of the D protein, a putative resolvase of the F-factor of Escherichia coli

The D protein encoded by plasmid mini-F promotes resolution of plasmid cointegrates or dimers of the F-factor or mini-F. In addition, two rfsF sequences are essential for this site-specific, recA-independent recombination event. The D gene was cloned into an expression vector and the gene product was overproduced in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. The sequence of the N-terminus of the D protein was determined, thus permitting identification of the correct translational start codon in the nucleotide sequence that results in a 29.6 kDa protein. The binding site for the purified D protein is located within the mini-F NcoI-HpaI DNA fragment (192 bp). Binding seems to be affected by DNA methylation, since the protein did not bind to DNA isolated from a dam mutant of E. coli. The binding site, which is a region of approximately 28 bp and is located 160 bp downstream of the rfsF site, was identified by DNase I footprinting using fluorescence labelled DNA.

A linguistic representation of the regulation of transcription initiation. II. Distinctive features of sigma 70 promoters and their regulatory binding sites

The goal of this paper and the accompanying one is to achieve a linguistic representation of a set of sigma 70 promoters. Such a description is formed by an ordered concatenated array of complex symbols identified by their categorical property, i.e. promoter, operator, activator binding site, etc. Each of these symbols may contain several properties associated with their respective classes of 'molecular words'. The main problem in attaining such a description is to define which properties are going to be represented, and how. In the accompanying paper the criteria on which the selection of alternative descriptions is based were discussed. The properties of promoters and regulatory sites are discussed here, and their corresponding distinctive features are selected following such criteria. Thus, information that is not directly relevant and that can overspecify the description has been excluded, since it does not seem to contribute to identifying classes of substitutable elements. Other properties, such as strength of promoters, position of regulatory sites, different types of specificities of regulatory proteins, affinity of their binding sites, etc., are also discussed. As a result of this analysis, a complete representation with distinctive features of the set of sigma 70 promoters is attainable.

Control site location and transcriptional regulation in Escherichia coli

The regulatory regions for 119 Escherichia coli promoters have been analyzed, and the locations of the regulatory sites have been cataloged. The following observations emerge. (i) More than 95% of promoters are coregulated with at least one other promoter. (ii) Virtually all sigma 70 promoters contain at least one regulatory site in a proximal position, touching at least position -65 with respect to the start point of transcription. There are not yet clear examples of upstream regulation in the absence of a proximal site. (iii) Operators within regulons appear in very variable proximal positions. By contrast, the proximal activation sites of regulons are much more fixed. (iv) There is a forbidden zone for activation elements downstream from approximately position -20 with respect to the start of transcription. By contrast, operators can occur throughout the proximal region. When activation elements appear in the forbidden zone, they repress. These latter examples usually involve autoregulation. (v) Approximately 40% of repressible promoters contain operator duplications. These occur either in certain regulons where duplication appears to be a requirement for repressor action or in promoters subject to complex regulation. (vi) Remote operator duplications occur in approximately 10% of repressible promoters. They generally appear when a multiple promoter region is coregulated by cyclic AMP receptor protein. (vii) Sigma 54 promoters do not require proximal or precisely positioned activator elements and are not generally subject to negative regulation. Rationales are presented for all of the above observations.

Expression of gene 1.2 and gene 10 of bacteriophage T7 is lethal to F plasmid-containing Escherichia coli

Plasmids expressing bacteriophage T7 gene 1.2 or gene 10 DNA transform F plasmid-containing strains of Escherichia coli only at low efficiency, though they transform plasmid-free strains normally. The gene products T7 gp1.2 and T7 gp10 appear to be the toxic agents, and their effects are directed towards the product of the F pifA gene, PifA. T7 gp1.2 and gp10 are also the two targets of the pif exclusion system of F, and their synthesis normally triggers the abortive infection of T7 in pifA+ hosts. The properties of plasmids containing T7 gene 1.2 or 10 suggest that they can be used to study the molecular mechanisms of phage exclusion in model systems that avoid the pleiotropic dysfunctions associated with an abortive infection.

Defective transcription of the right end of bacteriophage T7 DNA during an abortive infection of F plasmid-containing Escherichia coli

Transcription of T7 and mutant T3 DNA during infections of F plasmid-containing cells has been analyzed by using Southern hybridization. A transcriptional defect is apparent in these abortively infected cells that is most severe in the class III region of the phage genome. In particular, RNAs that are initiated from the gene 13 promoter are not elongated to give full-length molecules. It is suggested that the transcription defect results from positive supercoiling of the template DNA and that torsional constraints may even prevent the complete entry of the phage genome into an abortively infected cell.

Searching for and predicting the activity of sites for DNA binding proteins: compilation and analysis of the binding sites for Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF)

An analysis of the sequence information contained in a compilation of published binding sites for E. coli integration host factor (IHF) was performed. The sequences of twenty-seven IHF sites were aligned; the base occurrences at each position, the information content, and an extended consensus sequence were obtained for the IHF site. The base occurrences at each position of the IHF site were used with a program written for the Apple Macintosh computers in order to determine the similarity scores for published IHF sites. A linear correlation was found to exist between the logarithm of IHF binding and functional data (relative free energies) and similarity scores for two groups of IHF sites. The MacTargsearch program and its potential usefulness in searching for other sites and predicting their relative activities is discussed.

Integration host factor plays a role in IS50 and Tn5 transposition

In Escherichia coli, the frequencies of IS50 and Tn5 transposition are greater in Dam- cells than in isogenic Dam+ cells. IS50 transposition is increased approximately 1,000-fold and Tn5 transposition frequencies are increased about 5- to 10-fold in the absence of Dam methylation. However, in cells that are deficient for both integration host factor (IHF) and Dam methylase, the transposition frequencies of IS50 and Tn5 approximate those found in wild-type cells. The absence of IHF alone has no effect on either IS50 or Tn5 transposition. These results suggest that IHF is required for the increased transposition frequencies of IS50 and Tn5 that are observed in Dam- cells. It is also shown that the level of expression of IS50-encoded proteins, P1 and P2, required for IS50 and Tn5 transposition and its regulation does not decrease in IHF- or in IHF- Dam- cells. This result suggests that the effects of IHF on IS50 and Tn5 transposition are not at the level of IS50 gene expression. Finally, IHF is demonstrated to significantly retard the electrophoretic mobility of a 289-base-pair segment of IS50 DNA that contains a putative IHF protein-binding site. The physiological role of this IHF binding site remains to be determined.