Geriatric oncology: perspectives from decision analysis. A review

Radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer in patients aged 75 and over: safety, effectiveness and possible impact on survival

For patients with advanced, inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), increasing age seems to be the primary reason of receiving no treatment. The elderly aged 75 years and over are more likely to be given only supportive care (irrespective of symptoms) or no therapy at all. We evaluated the outcome of 48 patients, aged 75 years and over, treated with radiation therapy for advanced (stage IIIA-B), inoperable, symptomatic NSCLC. A median dose of 50 Gy was delivered to the primary site and mediastinum with standard fractionation. Based on WHO criteria, of 47 assessable patients, 21 had partial remission, 17 stable disease, and nine had progressive disease. Most symptoms were successfully palliated. Toxicity was negligible and mainly consisted of WHO grade I-II esophagitis. Despite the overall median survival being short (5 months), dose-related survival was much better in patients given at least 50 Gy than in those treated with lower doses: 52% versus 35% at 6 months, and 28% versus 4% at 13 months. These results confirm that radiation therapy may be safely delivered to very aged patients with advanced NSCLC at not merely palliative doses, both to achieve better local control and to give likely survival benefits. Adequate pretreatment evaluation should be always performed to exclude any comorbidity unfit to chest radiation and to individualize treatment to the single patient requirements. Because a large amount of literature data now concurs with the feasibility and safety of high-dose radiotherapy in the elderly, specifically designed, age-oriented trials are needed to settle definitively the issue of survival advantage from curative radiotherapy in these patients.

Radiation therapy of the older patient

Radiotherapy has a major role in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer therapy. It is widely used for curative and palliative treatment of cancer involving various sites. Radiotherapy is of particular benefit to older and frail cancer patients as an alternative to surgery and to systemic therapy. The available data on the sensitivity of normal tissues to radiotherapy in elderly patients strongly suggest that older patients with good functional status tolerate radiotherapy as well as younger patients and have comparable tumor response and survival rates. Aggressive radiotherapy should not be withheld from older patients because of chronological age alone.

Radiotherapy for cancer patients aged 80 and older: a study of effectiveness and side effects

PURPOSE

To profile cancer patients aged 80 and older undergoing radiotherapy and to study the tumor response and side effects of therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients aged 80 and older who received radiation therapy at James A. Haley Veterans Hospital and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center between 1988 and 1995. A total of 203 patients aged 80-94 received radiotherapy during this period. Treatment sites included head and neck [50], breast [16], chest [37], pelvis [53], and miscellaneous [39]. Age, treatment site, field size, total dose, response to treatment, treatment interruptions, incidence and severity of weight loss, myelosuppression, diarrhea, mucositis, dermatitis, and follow-up status are assessed using our departmental records and hospital tumor registry.

RESULTS

Of 191 patients evaluated, 179 (94%) completed the treatment without serious complications. A total of 195 sites were irradiated. Twelve patients (6%) required interruption of the treatment. Therapeutic responses were seen in 86 out of 112 patients (77%) treated with curative intent (with 67% complete response) and in 67 out of 83 patients (81%) treated with palliative intent. The causes of treatment interruptions included weight loss from diarrhea, dysphagia, and progressive disease. Treatment interruptions were more likely in patients treated with large treatment fields. In patients treated for upper aero-digestive tract cancer, Grade 3 and 4 mucositis was noted in 20 and 2% of patients, respectively. Grade 1 and 2 enteritis was noted in 43% of patients treated for pelvic malignancies. Grade 3 dermatitis was noted only in 2% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy is highly effective and well tolerated by the oldest old. Age is not a contraindication to aggressive radiotherapy.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the older person: a review

OBJECTIVE

To study the epidemiology of non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) in the older person and to explore treatment strategies for older persons with NHL.

DESIGN

Review of the English literature.

MEASUREMENTS

Incidence of NHL in patients of different ages; prevalence of NHL of different grades and stages in persons of different ages; and response to treatment, disease free survival, and survival, for patients of different ages.

RESULTS

The incidence of NHL in the aged has increased approximately 80% since 1970, and approximately one-half of the 40,000 annual new cases occur in persons aged 60 and older in the USA. The 2-4 phenoxy pesticides may be partly responsible for this increment. The treatment of low grade lymphoma is mostly palliative and well tolerated by the aged. Age may have an adverse effect on the prognosis of intermediate grade lymphomas, and the prevalence of poor prognostic factors and comorbidity increases with age. Among persons aged 65-75, the complete response rate (CRR) of intermediate grade NHL to chemotherapy is approximately 50%, and approximately one-third of complete responders remain alive and free of disease 5 years from diagnosis. Among those aged 75 and older, the CRR to chemotherapy is approximately 40%, and the median duration of response is 16 months. Strategies aimed to ameliorate treatment-related toxicity include lower doses of chemotherapy, choice of drugs better tolerated by older individuals, and prevention of chemotherapy-induced toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

NHL are an increasingly common problem for older persons. Approximately 80% of older patients with low grade lymphomas and 40%-50% of those with intermediate grade lymphomas may benefit from chemotherapy. Individualized treatment, based on life expectancy and comorbidity, is the key to effective management.

Prognostic evaluation in geriatric oncology: problems and perspectives

The optimal management of older patients with malignant diseases may be prevented by two antithetic conditions: inadequate treatment and excessive treatment. A likely root of this problem appears to be paucity of prognostic information, which may hamper management-related decisions in the older person with cancer. The prognostic value of performance status and nutritional status may fade with aging, while the influence of mental, emotional and socioeconomic status on the outcome of neoplastic diseases may become more prominent. The Comprehensive Geriatric Evaluation (CGE), which encompasses emotional mental and social domains in addition to physical health and function, may prove a valuable clue for the selection of those older patients who are suitable candidates for antineoplastic treatment.