Electrophysiologic effects of intravenous timolol

Effect of flestolol on ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The ultrashort-acting beta blocker flestolol was studied during atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 10 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Flestolol was given as a 100-micrograms/kg bolus followed by a 10-micrograms/kg/min infusion for 15 minutes. The drug did not alter the antegrade effective refractory period of the accessory pathway or the atrial paced cycle length at which block occurred in the accessory pathway. After flestolol, the percent of preexcited QRS complexes during AF increased (60 +/- 10 vs 87 +/- 5%, p = 0.01). Despite this, the ventricular rate slowed, with increases in mean RR interval (382 +/- 20 vs 416 +/- 22 ms, p = 0.02) and in the shortest interval between preexcited QRS complexes (251 +/- 18 vs 270 +/- 17 ms, p less than 0.01). The effect of isoproterenol 3 to 5 micrograms/min was studied in 5 patients. During atrial pacing, isoproterenol decreased the antegrade refractory period and the atrial paced cycle length of block in the accessory pathway (p less than or equal to 0.05). During AF, it decreased the percent of preexcited QRS complexes, mean RR interval and shortest interval between preexcited QRS complexes (p less than 0.05). Flestolol reversed the effects of isoproterenol both during atrial pacing and AF. Thus, flestolol does not alter conduction over the accessory pathway during atrial pacing, but during AF it slows conduction over the accessory pathway and prevents isoproterenol-mediated increases in ventricular rate. This suggests that in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome sympathetic stimulation after the onset of AF enhances conduction over the accessory pathway and is an important determinant of ventricular rate.

The effects of slow channel blockers and beta blockers on atrioventricular nodal conduction

The PR interval on the electrocardiogram represents the time that it takes an impulse to travel through the atrium and atrioventricular (AV) conduction system to the ventricles. Normally, activation is slowest in the AV node, and variations in PR interval most commonly parallel changes in AV nodal activation time. The AV nodal conduction time and effective refractory period are rate dependent and, in adult humans, are usually prolonged with increasing atrial paced rates. In addition, alterations in autonomic tone effect AV nodal conduction as well as sinus rate. The effect is usually in the same direction but often to different degrees. In patients with normal AV nodal function, parasympathetic and sympathetic tone are balanced at rest, but in patients with abnormal AV conduction, the effect of the parasympathetic system is more marked. Drugs including the slow channel blockers and beta blockers, affect AV nodal function. Slow channel blockers inhibit the slow inward calcium current, which may prolong conduction and refractoriness in the AV node. However, whereas diltiazem and verapamil have been shown to prolong AV nodal conduction and refractoriness in humans, nifedipine, a potent vasodilator, cannot be used in doses large enough to affect the AV node. The increase in PR interval caused by verapamil is minimal, and at doses of less than 480 mg/d, AV block occurs infrequently. When AV block occurs, it is first degree block in most patients, and it is usually asymptomatic. The electrophysiologic effects of diltiazem are similar to those of verapamil. Beta blockers also have a negative dromotropic effect on the AV node. They prolong the AH interval and AV nodal refractory periods and may lengthen the PR interval. The prolonged PR interval rarely results in more than first degree AV block in patients receiving maintenance therapy. In selected patients, combination therapy with a slow channel blocker and a beta blocker rarely causes second-degree AV block.

Electrophysiologic effects of beta blockers in ventricular arrhythmias

Beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agents are effective antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with ventricular arrhythmias. However, these agents exert little or no measurable electrophysiologic effect on normal Purkinje and ventricular muscle fibers when administered acutely. They prevent catecholamine-induced increases in Purkinje fiber automaticity and may interfere with catecholamine-dependent slow responses. beta-adrenergic blocking drugs also prevent the decrease in ventricular fibrillation threshold induced by catecholamines. In the acutely ischemic ventricle, some beta blockers selectively depress conduction within the ischemic zone. The long-term administration of some beta blockers has, in contrast to their short-term effects, been shown to prolong action potential duration and effective refractory period in the ventricle. Which of these observed electrophysiologic effects, either alone or in combination, contributes to the ventricular antiarrhythmic effects of beta-blocking drugs in man is at present unknown.

Clinical electrophysiology of flestolol, a potent ultra short-acting beta blocker

We measured the electrophysiologic effects of flestolol, an ultra short-acting beta blocker, in 15 patients at two infusion rates: a 45 micrograms/kg loading dose followed by a 5 micrograms/kg/min infusion and a 60 micrograms/kg loading dose followed by a 10 micrograms/kg/min infusion. Electrophysiologic measurements were made after 15 minutes at each infusion rate (plasma concentrations 46 +/- 11 and 94 +/- 23 ng/ml). Flestolol produced dose-dependent effects on the sinus node, the atrioventricular (AV) node, and right ventricular refractoriness, whereas atrial refractoriness and infranodal conduction were unchanged. At the 10 micrograms/kg/min dose, flestolol prolonged sinus cycle length by a mean of 20% (p = 0.0001), corrected sinus node recovery time by 42% (p = 0.02), AH interval by 21% (p = 0.0001), AV node effective refractory period by 28%, AV node Wenckebach cycle length by 30% (0.0001), and right ventricular effective refractory period by 5% (p = 0.03). A significant concentration-effect relationship (p less than or equal to 0.03) was present for all variables which had significant dose-effect relationships. No patient developed hypotension, bradyarrhythmias, or other toxicity. Sinus cycle length decreased linearly with time in the post infusion period (r = 0.99); by 30 minutes post infusion, measured electrophysiologic variables had returned to control values and flestolol plasma concentration had decreased to 4 +/- 2 ng/ml. Flestolol's electrophysiologic effects are similar to those of other beta blockers. In doses up to 10 micrograms/kg/min, it is safe in selected patients, has rapid onset and offset of action, and does not cause acute rebound.

Electrophysiology of esmolol

The electrophysiologic characteristics of esmolol were studied in 14 patients. Ten men and 4 women, mean age 57 years, were electrophysiologically evaluated at baseline, and also at 4 to 8 minutes after the administration of a maintenance infusion of esmolol. Plasma samples for esmolol blood levels were drawn at 10 minutes of the maintenance infusion, at the end of the maintenance infusion and 30 minutes after the maintenance infusion was discontinued. Results of this study showed that esmolol has typical beta-blocker electrophysiologic effects. Its major action was on sinus node function; it prolonged this basic sinus cycle length but had no significant effect on intrinsic automaticity as reflected by the corrected sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial conduction. Direct effects on atrioventricular (AV) nodal function were reflected by effects on AV nodal conduction and refractoriness. There was no direct effect on atrial function and, as expected, no effect on His-Purkinje or ventricular function. The intensity of esmolol's electrophysiologic effects on sinus node function, AV nodal conduction and AH interval is comparable to those of other beta blockers.

Electrophysiologic effects of intravenous metoprolol

We evaluated the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous metoprolol, a selective beta-1-blocking agent, in 12 patients. Electrophysiologic parameters were measured during the control period, immediately following, and 4 to 6 hours after infusion of 0.15 mg/kg. Metoprolol serum concentration was serially measured in 6 of the 12 patients. Immediately after metoprolol infusion, the sinus cycle length increased by 20% from 738 +/- 166 msec to 885 +/- 181 msec (p less than 0.01), AH interval during sinus rhythm increased by 34% from 83 +/- 27 msec to 112 +/- 37 msec (p less than 0.01), and antegrade atrioventricular (AV) nodal Wenckebach cycle length increased by 20% from 360 +/- 188 msec to 432 +/- 199 msec (p less than 0.01). Sinus node recovery time and sinoatrial conduction time did not become abnormally prolonged in any patient. His-Purkinje conduction was unaltered. High atrial and ventricular refractory periods were modestly increased (less than 15 msec); the increase in refractoriness reached statistical significance when repeat measurements were made at 4 to 6 hours. No adverse effects were noted. Metoprolol serum concentration at the time of peak measured electrophysiologic effect was 54.6 +/- 15.2 ng/ml. We conclude that at this dose, intravenous metoprolol significantly prolongs sinus cycle length and AV nodal conduction, may modestly increase atrial and ventricular refractoriness, and appears to have electrophysiologic potency similar to propranolol. It is well tolerated following intravenous administration and may be of particular value in the acute treatment of supraventricular tachycardia when beta-receptor selectivity is desired.