Differences in left ventricular function between anterior and inferior myocardial infarction of equivalent enzymatic size

Incremental prognostic value of speckle tracking echocardiography and early follow-up echo assessment in predicting left ventricular recovery after reperfusion for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

PURPOSE

Up to 50% of patients do not achieve significant left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI) for STEMI. We aimed to identify the echocardiographic predictors for LVEF recovery and assess the value of early follow-up echocardiography (Echo) in risk assessment of post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients.

METHODS

One hundred one STEMI patients undergoing PPCI were enrolled provided EF below 50%. Baseline echocardiography assessed LVEF, volumes, wall motion score index (WMSI), global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and E/e'. Follow-up echocardiography after 6 weeks reassessed left ventricular volumes, LVEF and GLS.GCS was not assessed at follow up. Patients were classified into recovery and non-recovery groups. Predictors of LVEF recovery and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 6 months were analysed.

RESULTS

The mean change of EF was 8.04 ± 3.32% in group I versus -.39 ± 5.09 % in group II (p < .001). Recovered patients had better baseline GLS, baseline GCS, E/e', and follow-up GLS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed E/e', GCS, and follow-up GLS after 6 weeks to be strong independent predictors for LVEF recovery. Composite MACE was considerably higher in group II (32.7% vs. 4.1%, p < .001) mainly driven by higher heart failure hospitalisation Multivariate regression analysis revealed baseline GLS, E/e', and ejection fraction (EF) percentage recovery as strong independent predictors for MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiparametric echocardiographic approach incorporating LVEF, strain parameters, and diastolic function could allow early optimal risk stratification after STEMI treated with PPCI. Follow-up GLS and LVEF percentage change are the strongest predictors for early LV recovery and long term clinical outcome, respectively.

In-Hospital Prognostic Value of Electrocardiographic Parameters Other Than ST-Segment Changes in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Literature Review and Future Perspectives

Electrocardiography (ECG) remains an irreplaceable tool in the management of the patients with myocardial infarction, with evaluation of the QRS and ST segment being the present major focus. Several ECG parameters have already been proposed to have prognostic value with regard to both in-hospital and long-term follow-up of patients. In this review, we discuss various ECG parameters other than ST segment changes, particularly with regard to their in-hospital prognostic importance. Our review not only evaluates the prognostic segments and parts of ECG, but also highlights the need for an integrative approach in big data to re-assess the parameters reported to predict in-hospital prognosis. The evolving importance of artificial intelligence in evaluation of ECG, particularly with regard to predicting prognosis, and the potential integration with other patient characteristics to predict prognosis, are discussed.

Echocardiographic determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to determine if factors other than the size of regional dysfunction influence the global left ventricular ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular ejection fraction is an important prognostic variable after acute myocardial infarction. Although infarct size is known to affect the subsequent global left ventricular ejection fraction, it remains unclear whether other factors such as site or severity of the wall motion abnormality influence the ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Sixty-nine consecutive patients (mean age 61 +/- 14 years, 46 [67%] male) who did not receive thrombolytic therapy or undergo early revascularization were studied by echocardiography 1 week after Q-wave myocardial infarction. The absolute size of the region of abnormal wall motion (AWM) and the percentage of the endocardium involved (%AWM) were quantitated along with the wall motion score. A severity index was then derived as the mean wall motion score within the region of AWM. Site of myocardial infarction was classified as either anterior or inferior from the endocardial map. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by Simpson's method with 2 apical views.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine (42%) patients had anterior and 40 had inferior myocardial infarction. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in anterior than in inferior myocardial infarction (44.8% +/- 11.5% vs 53% +/- 8.6%; P =. 001). The mean %AWM was greater in anterior than in inferior myocardial infarction (32.1 +/- 15.5 vs 22.4 +/- 14.1; P =.01). The mean wall motion score was greater in anterior than in inferior myocardial infarction (9.8 +/- 6.4 vs 6.4 +/- 4.4; P =.01). The mean severity index did not differ by site. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that, in descending order of importance, %AWM, extent of apical involvement, and site of myocardial infarction were independent determinants of global left ventricular ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

For myocardial infarctions of similar size, left ventricular ejection fraction is lower when apical involvement is extensive and the site of infarction is anterior. This site-dependent difference may be related to characteristics specific to the apex.

Quantification of infarct size by thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography using the unfolded map method. Comparison with QRS score and angiographic infarct size at 4 weeks after infarction

A new technique of data processing, the unfolded map method, was used with thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography to quantify infarct size in 35 patients with single-vessel disease at 4 weeks after their first myocardial infarction (24 anterior and 11 inferior infarcts), and the results were compared with those obtained by electrocardiography and contrast left ventriculography. The myocardial borders and the infarcted region were defined using the threshold technique and a cutoff value of 55%. Count profile data for each short-axis slice were unfolded zonally into single planes with the same ratio, and their areas were calculated from the slice thickness and radius. Thus, the size of the unfolded map represented the actual left ventricular myocardial area Infarct size was quantitated from the ratio of pixels in the infarcted region to those in the whole map, and the ratio itself was used as the percent infarct size. Although a defect 1 cm in diameter (0.8 cm2) could not be detected in a phantom study, defects > or = 2 cm in diameter (> or = 3.1 cm2) could be measured satisfactorily. The infarct size and percent infarct size determined by the unfolded map method correlated well with the QRS score (r = 0.841 and r = 0.838), the percentage of abnormally contracting segments on left ventriculography (r = 0.835 and r = 0.877), and the ejection fraction (r = -0.835 and r = 0.856). These data indicate that the unfolded map method provides adequate quantification of infarct size, even in the chronic phase, without complicated data processing.

Regression of ECG signs of myocardial infarction related to infarct size and left ventricular function

Quantitative and qualitative analyses of Q waves and QRS scores were performed on 69 patients during the early phase of first myocardial infarction (MI) and 6 months subsequently. The regression of ECG signs of MI were compared with the enzymatically estimated size of MI, the location of MI, and with the changes of global ejection fraction (GEF) assessed by radionuclide ventriculography. Among 57 patients with Q wave MI a complete disappearance of ECG signs of MI was found in 9 (15.7%). Patients with MI of inferior location showed a significantly higher reduction of Q waves (p < 0.001) and QRS scores (p < 0.001) than the anterior MI group. In the group of 12 patients with non Q wave MI, 11 demonstrated complete regression of MI signs. Among all Q wave and non Q wave MIs, the authors found no significant difference in the size of MI between patients with and without complete regression of ECG signs of MI. The median of the percent of change of the QRS score was significantly higher (p = 0.04) in the group of patients with improved GEFs than in the group of patients with decreased or unchanged GEFs 6 months following acute MI. The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for improved left ventricular function according to the change of Q waves and ECG scores were 91%, 32%, and 62%; for changes of Q waves, 81%, 40%, and 63%; and for changes of ECG scores, 91%, 36%, and 64%, respectively. In the group of patients with non Q wave MI these values were 100%, 50%, and 91% as a result of ST-T disappearance.

Performance of the automated complete Selvester QRS scoring system in normal subjects and patients with single and multiple myocardial infarctions

The automated version of the complete Selvester QRS scoring system for estimation of myocardial infarct size was evaluated in 1,344 normal subjects, 706 patients with a single myocardial infarction (366 with inferior infarction, 277 with anterior infarction and 63 with posterolateral infarction) and 131 patients with combined inferior and anterior infarction. The presence and location were determined by angiographic and ventriculographic criteria. The performance of the overall 32-point system, each of the 19 criteria and the 13 criteria sets and each of the 35 criteria within the 13 sets was examined. The mean point scores were 1.7 for normal subjects, 3.7 for posterolateral infarction, 4.1 for inferior infarction, 6.3 for anterior infarction and 6.9 for multiple infarcts. A score greater than 4 yielded a sensitivity of 67% for anterior infarction, 41% for inferior infarction, 32% for posterolateral infarction and 72% for multiple infarcts. However, 7 of 32 criteria failed to achieve 95% specificity and 10 of 35 criteria in criteria sets had a sensitivity that was even lower than their false positive rate. The automated Selvester QRS scoring system currently has limitations that are attributable to development of the original system, which used manual scoring techniques and established criteria limits from middle-aged men. Future automated analysis should use gender- and age-dependent criteria limits.

The in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction: incidence, predictors of occurrence, outcome and prognostic factors. The MILIS Study Group

The incidence, outcome and predictors of the in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock and its prognostic significance were analyzed in 845 patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction. Cardiogenic shock developed after hospitalization in 60 patients (7.1%). In half of these patients, cardiogenic shock developed at least 24 h after hospital admission. The in-hospital mortality rate was greater than 15 times higher for patients with cardiogenic shock than for patients without shock (65.0% versus 4.3%, respectively, p less than 0.001). Enzymatic evidence of infarct extension occurred in 23.3% of the patients with shock compared with 7.4% of those without shock (p less than 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that independent predictors for the in-hospital development of cardiogenic shock were age greater than 65 years (p = 0.007), left ventricular ejection fraction on hospital admission less than 35% (p = 0.007), large infarct as estimated from serial enzyme determinations (that is, peak creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme greater than 160 IU/liter (p = 0.008), history of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.011) and previous myocardial infarction (p = 0.012). Patients with three, four or five of these risk factors had a 17.9%, 33.7% or 54.4% probability, respectively, of developing cardiogenic shock after hospital admission. Left ventricular function, as reflected by left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.04) and severity of left ventricular wall motion abnormality (p = 0.04), was the most important determinant of in-hospital mortality in the patients with cardiogenic shock.