Modulation of electrically elicited blink reflex components by visual and acoustic prestimuli in man

In the spotlight: How the brainstem modulates information flow

OBJECTIVE

The blink reflex (BR) to supraorbital nerve (SON) stimulation is reduced by either a low-intensity prepulse stimulus to digital nerves (prepulse inhibition, PPI) or a conditioning SON stimulus (SON_-1) of the same intensity as the test (SON_-2) stimulus (paired-pulse paradigm). We studied how PPI affects BR excitability recovery (BRER) to paired SON stimulation.

METHODS

Electrical prepulses were applied to the index finger 100 ms before SON_-1, which was followed by SON_-2 at interstimulus intervals (ISI) of 100, 300, or 500 ms.

RESULTS

BRs to SON_-1 showed PPI proportional to prepulse intensity, but this did not affect BRER at any ISI. PPI was observed on the BR to SON_-2 only when additional prepulses were applied 100 ms before SON_-2, regardless of the size of BRs to SON_-1.

CONCLUSIONS

In BR paired-pulse paradigms, the size of the response to SON_-2 is not determined by the size of the response to SON_-1. PPI does not leave any trace of inhibitory activity after it is enacted.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data demonstrate that BR response size to SON_-2 depends on SON_-1 stimulus intensity and not SON_-1 response size, an observation that calls for further physiological studies and cautions against unanimous clinical applicability of BRER curves.

Threat vs control: Potentiation of the trigeminal blink reflex by threat proximity is overruled by self-stimulation

The magnitude of the defensive blink reflex is modulated by continuous assessment of its protective value. Here, we studied whether the trigeminal blink reflex (TBR) is modulated by a potentially offensive object close to the face, and, if so, whether self-stimulation or observation of the act of stimulus triggering counteracts such modulation. In all, 26 healthy volunteers participated in various experimental conditions. At baseline, an experimenter triggered supraorbital nerve stimuli remotely, unseen by the participants; in experimental conditions, the experimenter held a stimulation probe close to the participant's face but triggered the stimuli either remotely, "surprising" participants (S₁ ), or directly on the probe, observed by participants (S₂ ). In other conditions, participants triggered stimuli themselves on the probe held next to their body (S₃ ) or held in front of their face (S₄ ). The latter condition was repeated similarly, but pressing the button only randomly generated electrical stimuli (S5, "Russian roulette"). The size of the R2 component of the TBR (TBR-R2) was the main outcome measure. Compared to baseline, TBR-R2 area was significantly larger in S₁ when the "threatening" probe was close to the face and the participant had no control over stimulation. Conversely, TBR-R2 was suppressed when participants either saw the action of triggering, thus being aware (S₂ ), or had full initiative over stimulation (S₃ , S₄ ). Random self-generated stimuli (S₅ ) inhibited TBR-R2, but to a lesser extent than S₃ and S_4. Perceived threat close to the face facilitates TBR-R2, but knowledge about impending stimulation or self-agency overrules this effect.

Differences of Anti-Nociceptive Mechanisms of Migraine Drugs on the Trigeminal Pain Processing during and Outside Acute Migraine Attacks

The aim of this study was to investigate central anti-nociceptive mechanisms of i.v. acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and oral zolmitriptan (ZOL) in migraine patients and healthy subjects using the ‘nociceptive’ blink reflex (nBR). Twenty-eight migraine patients received ASA ( n = 14, 1000 mg i.v) or ZOL ( n = 14, 5 mg p.o) during the acute migraine attack and interictally. Thirty healthy subjects received either ASA or ZOL vs. placebo using a double blind cross over design. nBR was recorded in all patients and subjects before, 60 and 90 min after treatment. ASA and ZOL did not inhibit nBR responses in healthy subjects. Both ASA and ZOL suppressed nBR responses (ASA by 68%, ZOL by 78%) only during the acute attack but not interictally. The data suggest, that the anti-nociceptive effects of migraine drugs on the trigeminal nociceptive processing are different during and outside an acute migraine attack.

Prepulse inhibition and P50 suppression: commonalities and dissociations

Patients with schizophrenia exhibit reduced levels of both prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex (PPI) and condition-test suppression of the P50 event-related potential. This study investigated the extent to which PPI and P50 suppression, which exhibit similar parametric sensitivities, are intrinsically auditory phenomena or can be induced cross-modally, and reflect common or distinct neural mechanisms of inhibition. PPI, N100, and P50 were assessed in 20 healthy male volunteers, using auditory test probes and both visual and auditory lead stimuli, separated by 100- or 500-ms interstimulus intervals (ISIs). PPI was found in the auditory-lead condition across the complete group, and with visual-lead stimuli in approximately half of the subjects. Intra-modal auditory PPI was significantly higher with the 100-ms ISI than with the 500-ms ISI. P50 suppression was found only with the 500-ms ISI, with no difference between the auditory and visual conditions. Source analyses revealed that suppression was associated with frontal cortical activity. N100 suppression was found only in the auditory condition, with no difference between 100- and 500-ms ISIs. Although both phenomena are considered to provide operational measures of gating, PPI and P50 suppression are differentially sensitive to ISI and therefore reflect partly different neural mechanisms. They are not intrinsically auditory phenomena, and both appear to involve frontal cortical activity. In contrast, N100 suppression is most likely based on refractory mechanisms intrinsic to the auditory system.

Modulation of trigeminal reflex excitability in migraine: effects of attention and habituation on the blink reflex

The modulation of trigeminal reflex excitability in migraine patients was evaluated during the asymptomatic phase by studying the effects of attention, habituation and preconditioning stimulus on the R2 and R3 components of the blink reflex (BR). Fifty patients suffering from migraine without aura, 20 affected by migraine with aura and 35 sex- and age-matched controls were selected. In subgroups of migraine with-aura and without-aura patients, and normal controls, the blink reflex was elicited during different cognitive situations: (a) spontaneous mental activity; (b) stimulus anticipation; (c) recognition of target numbers. In the remaining subjects, R2 and R3 habituation was evaluated by repetitive stimulation at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 s intervals. The R2 and R3 recovery curves were also computed. A reduced R3 threshold with a normal pain threshold was found in migraine with-aura and without-aura patients; the R3 component was not significantly correlated with the pain thresholds in patients and controls. The R2 and R3 components were less influenced by the warning of the stimulus in migraine without-aura and migraine with-aura patients, in comparison with the control group. A slight increase of both R2 and R3 recovery after preconditioning stimulus was also observed in migraine patients, probably caused by a phenomenon of trigeminal hyperexcitability persisting after the last attack. The abnormal BR modulation by alerting expresses in migraine a dysfunction of adaptation capacity to environmental conditions, probably predisposing to migraine.

Impaired attention modulation of the blink reflex R3 component in Parkinson's disease: a non-task warning paradigm study

PURPOSE

the aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the attention modulating actions on the polysynaptic component of blink reflex responses and especially of the R3 component in patients suffering from Parkinson's Disease (PD). To this end, a non-task warning paradigm was adopted.

METHODS

attention processing was evaluated by means of a non-task paradigm in 55 patients suffering from PD. Subjects were presented with a visual 'warning' prestimulus and the blink reflex (BR) analyzed with special regard for any modulation of its polysynaptic components (R2-R3).

RESULTS

The mean amplitude of the post-warning R3 component (PW-R3c) of 'de novo' PD patients was 62% of the corresponding component following unannounced stimuli, a figure which differs significantly from both treated PD patients (18.9%) and control subjects (15.4%). De novo patients subsequently started on L-dopa therapy exhibited a more pronounced inhibition of the R3 component after warning stimulus, as the PW-R3c percentage decreased. Inversely, treated patients whose therapy was withheld showed decreased inhibition of this component. Regarding R2, the mean PW-R2c in the de novo patients differed slightly from that of the treated patients (P<0.05), but not from that of the control subjects. Such a finding may be attributable to a specific effects on the excitability of the polysynaptic responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Attention disorders in PD have been well documented by means of this kind of non-task warning paradigm, which appears to probe the modulation of the BR R3 component, even if the interpretation of this R3 changes suggesting a specific alteration of attention processing must be put forward extremely carefully, because something similar, but less evident, appears also for R2.

Nociceptive quality of the laser-evoked blink reflex in humans

Laser radiant-heat pulses selectively excite the free nerve endings in the superficial layers of the skin and activate mechano-thermal nociceptive afferents; when directed to the perioral or supraorbital skin, high-intensity laser pulses evoke a blink-like response in the orbicularis oculi muscle (the laser blink reflex, LBR). We investigated the functional properties (startle or nociceptive origin) of the LBR and sought to characterize its central pathways. Using high-intensity CO(2)-laser stimulation of the perioral or supraorbital regions and electromyographic (EMG) recordings from the orbicularis oculi muscles, we did five experiments in 20 healthy volunteers. First, to investigate whether the LBR is a startle response, we studied its habituation to expected rhythmic stimuli and to unexpected arrhythmic stimuli. To assess its possible nociceptive quality, we studied changes in the LBR and the R2 component of the electrical blink reflex after a lidocaine-induced supraorbital nerve block and after intramuscular injection of the opiate fentanyl and the opiate-antagonist naloxone. To characterize the central pathways for the LBR, we investigated the interaction between the LBR and the three components of the blink reflex (R1, R2, and R3) by delivering laser pulses to the perioral or supraorbital regions before or after electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve at various interstimulus intervals. Finally, to gain further information on the central LBR pathways, using two identical CO(2)-laser stimulators, we studied the LBR recovery curves with paired laser pulses delivered to adjacent forehead points at interstimulus intervals from 250 ms to 1.5 s. The LBR withstood relatively high-frequency rhythmic stimulations, and unexpected laser pulses failed to evoke larger responses. When lidocaine began to induce hypoalgesia (about 5 min after the injection), the LBR was abolished, whereas R2 was only partly suppressed 10 min after the injection. Fentanyl injection induced strong, naloxone-reversible, LBR suppression (the response decreased to 25.3% of predrug values at 10 min and to 4% at 20 min), whereas R2 remained appreciably unchanged. Whether directed to the perioral or supraorbital regions, preceding laser pulses strongly suppressed R2 and R3 though not R1. Conversely, preceding electrical stimuli to the supraorbital nerve suppressed the LBR. In response to paired stimuli, the LBR recovered significantly faster than R2. These findings indicate that the LBR is a nociceptive reflex, which shares part of the interneuron chain mediating the nonnociceptive R2 blink reflex, probably in the medullary reticular formation. The LBR may prove useful for studying the pathophysiology of orofacial pain syndromes.

Influence of stimulus control on the excitability of the electrically elicited blink reflex in patients with schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

In humans, the excitability of the electrically evoked blink reflex is influenced by the subject's attention to the stimulus. The early reflex component R1 has been found to be facilitated in conditions of increased selective attention, whereas the late components R2 and R3 exhibited a marked suppression. Distraction from the stimulus leads to enhanced R2 and R3 magnitudes.

METHODS

We investigated the excitability of the distinct reflex components in 19 patients with schizophrenia and 19 healthy control subjects. In the control condition (EE), stimulation was elicited by the experimenter; in a second condition (SE), subjects released a key to evoke the reflex themselves.

RESULTS

The SE patients with schizophrenia exhibited an abnormally increased R1 facilitation and an impaired R2 inhibition in comparison with normal control subjects. An R3 component could be registered in EE in 13 of 19 patients but only in one control subject; SE resulted in a complete suppression of this component in all but two patients with schizophrenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The abnormal R1 facilitation and the impaired R2 inhibition may be regarded as neurophysiological markers of defective information processing in a condition of increased selective attention to a self-controlled stimulus in patients with schizophrenia. The enhanced excitability of the R3 component under standard conditions indicates defective attentional mechanisms in patients with schizophrenia in an uninstructed passive condition attending a stimulus triggered by the experimenter.

Conditioning of the masseter inhibitory reflex by homotopically applied painful heat in humans

During contraction of the jaw-closing muscles, afferent input from the intraoral and perioral region can elicit two bilateral suppression periods (SP1 and SP2, respectively) in the masseter electromyogram (EMG). Non-painful electrical stimulation 2 cm from the left labial commissure was used in the present study to evoke these trigeminal inhibitory reflexes. The subjects maintained a level of 50% of their maximum masseter EMG. The degree of suppression was quantified as the percentage suppression of the mean EMG activity in a fixed post-stimulus interval (SP2, 40-90 ms). Further, brief (200 ms) painful radiant heat conditioning stimuli were delivered to the ipsilateral cheek, in order to investigate the influence of nociceptive input on the (non-nociceptive) trigeminal masseter inhibitory reflex. Nine different conditions combining radiant heat and electrical stimuli were used. Twelve stimuli were presented for each condition. The radiant heat preceded the electrical test stimuli by fixed inter-stimulus intervals (ISI), ranging from 100 ms to 500 ms. At 250-350 ms ISIs, the bilateral SP2 suppression was significantly reduced to less than 10%, in comparison to an average suppression degree of 32.5% without conditioning stimuli. The subjects perceived the heat stimulus before the electrical stimulus for a majority of the 12 pairs of stimuli at these ISIs. No differences were found in the VAS ratings for the different conditions. For the contralateral SP1, larger suppression was seen for the 300 ms ISI compared with stimulation without conditioning heat stimuli. Onset and offset for the SP1 was, however, only detected in three subjects using a criteria of 20% suppression of the pre-stimulus activity. A pre-pulse inhibitory effect onto inter-neurons in the SP2 pathways or habituation of the same inter-neurons by the heat stimuli are suggested as possible explanations for the interaction between the non-nociceptive and nociceptive input in the present study.