Expression of the cloned S4 gene of reovirus serotype 3 in transformed eucaryotic cells: enrichment of the viral protein in the crude initiation factor fraction

The multi-functional reovirus σ3 protein is a virulence factor that suppresses stress granule formation and is associated with myocardial injury

The mammalian orthoreovirus double-stranded (ds) RNA-binding protein σ3 is a multifunctional protein that promotes viral protein synthesis and facilitates viral entry and assembly. The dsRNA-binding capacity of σ3 correlates with its capacity to prevent dsRNA-mediated activation of protein kinase R (PKR). However, the effect of σ3 binding to dsRNA during viral infection is largely unknown. To identify functions of σ3 dsRNA-binding activity during reovirus infection, we engineered a panel of thirteen σ3 mutants and screened them for the capacity to bind dsRNA. Six mutants were defective in dsRNA binding, and mutations in these constructs cluster in a putative dsRNA-binding region on the surface of σ3. Two recombinant viruses expressing these σ3 dsRNA-binding mutants, K287T and R296T, display strikingly different phenotypes. In a cell-type dependent manner, K287T, but not R296T, replicates less efficiently than wild-type (WT) virus. In cells in which K287T virus demonstrates a replication deficit, PKR activation occurs and abundant stress granules (SGs) are formed at late times post-infection. In contrast, the R296T virus retains the capacity to suppress activation of PKR and does not mediate formation of SGs at late times post-infection. These findings indicate that σ3 inhibits PKR independently of its capacity to bind dsRNA. In infected mice, K287T produces lower viral titers in the spleen, liver, lungs, and heart relative to WT or R296T. Moreover, mice inoculated with WT or R296T viruses develop myocarditis, whereas those inoculated with K287T do not. Overall, our results indicate that σ3 functions to suppress PKR activation and subsequent SG formation during viral infection and that these functions correlate with virulence in mice.

The σ3 protein of mammalian orthoreoviruses is a double-stranded RNA binding protein that has classically been thought to function by scavenging dsRNA within infected cells and thus prevents activation of cellular sensors of dsRNA such as the kinase PKR. Here we used mutagenesis to identify the region of σ3 responsible for binding dsRNA. Characterization of mutant viruses expressing σ3 proteins incapable of binding dsRNA show that contrary to expectation, dsRNA binding is not required for σ3-mediated inhibition of PKR. We show that one mutant virus (R296T) despite being deficient in dsRNA-binding can inhibit PKR and replicates similar to WT virus. In contrast, another mutant virus (K287T) that bears a σ3 protein that cannot prevent dsRNA-mediated activation of PKR induces stress granules in infected cells and replicates less efficiently than WT virus. In vivo, the K287T mutant is attenuated in its replication and unlike WT virus and the R296T mutant virus does not cause heart disease (myocarditis).

The Paradoxes of Viral mRNA Translation during Mammalian Orthoreovirus Infection

De novo viral protein synthesis following entry into host cells is essential for viral replication. As a consequence, viruses have evolved mechanisms to engage the host translational machinery while at the same time avoiding or counteracting host defenses that act to repress translation. Mammalian orthoreoviruses are dsRNA-containing viruses whose mRNAs were used as models for early investigations into the mechanisms that underpin the recognition and engagement of eukaryotic mRNAs by host cell ribosomes. However, there remain many unanswered questions and paradoxes regarding translation of reoviral mRNAs in the context of infection. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge about reovirus translation, identifies key unanswered questions, and proposes possible pathways toward a better understanding of reovirus translation.

Synthesis and Translation of Viral mRNA in Reovirus-Infected Cells: Progress and Remaining Questions

At the end of my doctoral studies, in 1988, I published a review article on the major steps of transcription and translation during the mammalian reovirus multiplication cycle, a topic that still fascinates me 30 years later. It is in the nature of scientific research to generate further questioning as new knowledge emerges. Our understanding of these fascinating viruses thus remains incomplete but it seemed appropriate at this moment to look back and reflect on our progress and most important questions that still puzzle us. It is also essential of being careful about concepts that seem so well established, but could still be better validated using new approaches. I hope that the few reflections presented here will stimulate discussions and maybe attract new investigators into the field of reovirus research. Many other aspects of the viral multiplication cycle would merit our attention. However, I will essentially limit my discussion to these central aspects of the viral cycle that are transcription of viral genes and their phenotypic expression through the host cell translational machinery. The objective here is not to review every aspect but to put more emphasis on important progress and challenges in the field.

Characterization of the thermosensitive ts453 reovirus mutant: increased dsRNA binding of sigma 3 protein correlates with interferon resistance

The mutation harbored by the reovirus ts453 thermosensitive mutant has been assigned to the S4 gene encoding the major outer capsid protein sigma 3. Previous gene sequencing has identified a nonconservative amino acid substitution located near the zinc finger of sigma 3 protein in the mutant. Coexpression in COS cells of the sigma 3 protein presenting this amino acid substitution (N16K), together with the other major capsid protein mu 1, has also revealed an altered interaction between the two proteins; this altered interaction prevents the sigma 3-dependent cleavage of mu 1 to mu 1C. This could explain the lack of outer capsid assembly observed during ts453 virus infection at nonpermissive temperature. In the present study, we pursued the characterization of this mutant sigma 3 protein. Although the N16K mutation is located close to the zinc finger region, it did not affect the ability of the protein to bind zinc. In contrast, this mutation, as well as mutations within the zinc finger motif itself, can increase the binding of the protein to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). It also appears that the N16K mutant protein is more efficiently transported to the nucleus than the wild-type protein, an observation consistent with the postulated role of dsRNA binding in sigma 3 nuclear presence. The lack of association with mu 1, and/or the increased dsRNA-binding activity of sigma 3, could be responsible for a partial resistance of the ts453 virus to interferon treatment and this could have important consequences in the context of protein synthesis regulation during natural reovirus infection.

Molecular mechanisms of interferon resistance mediated by viral-directed inhibition of PKR, the interferon-induced protein kinase

The interferon (IFN)-induced cellular antiviral response is the first line of defense against viral infection within an animal host. In order to establish a productive infection, eukaryotic viruses must first overcome the IFN-induced blocks imposed on viral replication. The double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) is a key component mediating the antiviral actions of IFN. This IFN-induced protein kinase can restrict viral replication through its ability to phosphorylate the protein synthesis initiation factor eukaryotic initiation factor-2 alpha-subunit and reduce levels of viral protein synthesis. Viruses, therefore, must block the function of PKR in order to avoid these deleterious antiviral effects associated with PKR activity. Indeed, many viruses have developed effective measures to repress PKR activity during infection. This review will focus primarily on an overview of the different molecular mechanisms employed by these viruses to meet a common goal: the inhibition of PKR function, uncompromised viral protein synthesis, and unrestricted virus replication. The past few years have seen exciting new advances in this area. Rather unexpectedly, this area of research has benefited from the use of the yeast system to study PKR. Other recent advances include studies on PKR regulation by the herpes simplex viruses and data from our laboratory on the medically important hepatitis C viruses. We speculate that IFN is ineffective as a therapeutic agent against hepatitis C virus because the virus can effectively repress PKR function. Finally, we will discuss briefly the future directions of this PKR field.

Two basic motifs of reovirus sigma 3 protein are involved in double-stranded RNA binding

It has been reported that the sigma 3 protein of reovirus can exert an inhibitory effect on the cellular double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) activated protein kinase. Activation of this kinase is thought to be a general mechanism mediating a cellular antiviral response. This enzyme can also be activated upon transfection, resulting in translational inhibition of plasmid-encoded mRNAs. sigma 3 has an affinity for dsRNA postulated to be responsible for antikinase activity. In the present study, site-directed mutagenesis was performed on two basic regions previously suggested as dsRNA-binding motifs and the mutant sigma 3 proteins were then expressed in COS cells. These experiments revealed that both motifs are involved in sigma 3 attachment to RNA. Expression of the mutants lacking RNA-binding capability is stimulated by coexpression of another dsRNA-binding protein, the E3L vaccinia virus protein. These results support a model in which the attachment to dsRNA is directly responsible for the trans-stimulating effect of sigma 3 on expression of cotransfected genes.

Comparative sequence analysis of the reovirus S4 genes from 13 serotype 1 and serotype 3 field isolates

The reovirus sigma 3 protein is a major outer capsid protein that may function to regulate translation within infected cells. To facilitate the understanding of sigma 3 structure and functions and the evolution of mammalian reoviruses, we sequenced cDNA copies of the S4 genes from 10 serotype 3 and 3 serotype 1 reovirus field isolates and compared these sequences with sequences of prototypic strains of the three reovirus serotypes. We found that the sigma 3 proteins are highly conserved: the two longest conserved regions contain motifs proposed to function in binding zinc and double-stranded RNA. We used the 16 viral isolates to investigate the hypothesis that structural interactions between sigma 3 and the cell attachment protein, sigma 1, constrain their evolution and to identify a determinant within sigma 3 that is in close proximity to the sigma 1 hemagglutination site.

The viral protein sigma 3 participates in translation of late viral mRNA in reovirus-infected L cells

Reovirus late (uncapped) mRNA was previously shown to be efficiently translated in vitro extracts prepared from infected cells but not from uninfected cells. We demonstrated that different fractions from infected cells can stimulate translation of late viral mRNA when added to uninfected extracts. The activity of the different fractions correlated with their relative content of the sigma 3 capsid protein; the fraction prepared by high-salt wash of the ribosomes had the highest specific activity. The activity present in this fraction was abolished by preincubation with an anti-sigma 3 serum. Purified sigma 3 protein also stimulated the translation of late viral mRNA, confirming that it was the factor involved. Altogether, these results suggest that this protein plays the role of a late-viral-mRNA-specific initiation factor. The absence of an inhibitory effect of sigma 3 on the translation of other mRNAs indicates that this protein is not directly involved in the inhibition of host and early viral mRNA translation that occurs in infected cells but that a second mechanism is probably operative.

Multiple forms of the sigma 3 protein of reovirus: occurrence and binding properties

The sigma 3 protein of reovirus serotype 3 is present in different forms differing in isoelectric point, as already described by other authors. Proteolytic digestion of each of these forms generates similar peptides. The different forms are present in the mature virus and have affinity for double-stranded RNA and for ribosomes. The observations that the different forms have the same functional properties and are absent in reovirus serotype 1 suggest that the presence of multiple forms is dispensable. The different forms can be synthesized by in vitro translation of mRNA extracted from infected cells. However, only one form is clearly made when mRNA synthesized in vitro, using the cloned S4 gene encoding sigma 3 as a template, is translated in vitro. Similarly the cloned S4 gene expressed in vivo produces only one form of the protein. These results indicate that the other forms are not derived by post-translational modification. The different forms are possibly due to the presence of mutant viruses.