Regional variation in the incidence of diabetes-related amputations in The Netherlands

Incidence of Lower Extremity Amputation in Romania: A Nationwide 5-Year Cohort Study, 2015-2019

Background and Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of lower extremity amputations (LEAs) in a representative population from Romania, in both diabetic and non-diabetic adults, including trauma-related amputations. The secondary objective was to evaluate the trends in LEAs and the overall ratio of major-to-minor amputations. Material and Methods: The study was retrospective and included data from the Romanian National Hospital Discharge Records, conducted between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019. Results: The overall number of cases with LEAs was 88,102, out of which 38,590 were aterosclerosis-related LEAs, 40,499 were diabetes-related LEAs, and 9013 were trauma-related LEAs, with an ascending trend observed annually for each of these categories. Of the total non-traumatic amputations, 51.2% were in patients with diabetes. Most LEAs were in men. The total incidence increased from 80.61/100,000 in 2015 to 98.15/100,000 in 2019. Conclusions: Our study reported a 21% increase in total LEAs, 22.01% in non-traumatic LEAs, and 19.65% in trauma-related amputation. The minor-to-major amputation ratio increased over the study period in patients with diabetes. According to these findings, it is estimated that currently, in Romania, there is one diabetes-related amputation every hour and one non-traumatic amputation every 30 min.

Improving health outcomes of people with diabetes: target setting for the WHO Global Diabetes Compact

The Global Diabetes Compact is a WHO-driven initiative uniting stakeholders around goals of reducing diabetes risk and ensuring that people with diabetes have equitable access to comprehensive, affordable care and prevention. In this report we describe the development and scientific basis for key health metrics, coverage, and treatment targets accompanying the Compact. We considered metrics across four domains: factors at a structural, system, or policy level; processes of care; behaviours and biomarkers such as glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c); and health events and outcomes; and three risk tiers (diagnosed diabetes, high risk, or whole population), and reviewed and prioritised them according to their health importance, modifiability, data availability, and global inequality. We reviewed the global distribution of each metric to set targets for future attainment. This process led to five core national metrics and target levels for UN member states: (1) of all people with diabetes, at least 80% have been clinically diagnosed; and, for people with diagnosed diabetes, (2) 80% have HbA1c concentrations below 8·0% (63·9 mmol/mol); (3) 80% have blood pressure lower than 140/90 mm Hg; (4) at least 60% of people 40 years or older are receiving therapy with statins; and (5) each person with type 1 diabetes has continuous access to insulin, blood glucose meters, and test strips. We also propose several complementary metrics that currently have limited global coverage, but warrant scale-up in population-based surveillance systems. These include estimation of cause-specific mortality, and incidence of end-stage kidney disease, lower-extremity amputations, and incidence of diabetes. Primary prevention of diabetes and integrated care to prevent long-term complications remain important areas for the development of new metrics and targets. These metrics and targets are intended to drive multisectoral action applied to individuals, health systems, policies, and national health-care access to achieve the goals of the Global Diabetes Compact. Although ambitious, their achievement can result in broad health benefits for people with diabetes.

Editor's Choice - Incidence of Lower Limb Amputations in Sweden from 2008 to 2017

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the recent national and regional incidence of lower limb amputations (LLAs) in Sweden and their annual changes.

METHODS

This was an observational study using Swedish national register data. All initial amputations were identified in Sweden from 2008 to 2017 in individuals 18 years or older using the national inpatient register. The amputations were categorised into three levels: high proximal (through or above the knee joint), low proximal (through the tibia to through the ankle joint), and partial foot amputations. To examine the national and regional incidence and annual changes, the age, sex, and region specific population count each year was used as the denominator and Poisson regression or negative binomial regression models were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for age and sex.

RESULTS

The national annual incidence of LLAs was 22.1 per 100 000 inhabitants, with a higher incidence in men (24.2) than in women (20.0). The incidence of LLAs (all levels combined) declined during the study period, with an IRR of 0.984 per year (95% CI 0.973 - 0.994). This was mainly due to a decrease in high proximal amputations (0.985, 95% CI 0.974 - 0.995) and low proximal amputations (0.973, 95% CI 0.962 - 0.984). No change in the incidence of partial foot amputations was observed (0.994, 95% CI 0.974 - 1.014). Such declines in LLA incidence (all levels combined) were observed in nine of the 21 regions. Compared with the national average and with adjustment for age, sex, diabetes, and artery disease, the regional IRR varied from 0.85 to 1.36 for all LLAs, from 0.67 to 1.61 for high proximal amputations, from 0.50 to 1.51 for low proximal amputations, and from 0.13 to 3.68 for partial foot amputations.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of LLAs has decreased in Sweden. However, regional variations in incidence, time trends, and amputation levels warrant further research.

Spatial analysis of factors impacting lower limb major amputation rates in Hungary

Summary: Background: Lower limb major amputations represent a substantial public health burden in Hungary, where previous research revealed markedly high rates with significant spatial variations. Therefore, we aimed to assess to what extent healthcare and socio-economic factors in the local environment explain the regional disparity. Patients and methods: In a retrospective cohort analysis, based on the healthcare administrative data of the Hungarian population, lower limb major amputations were identified from 1st of January 2017 to 31st of December 2019. The permanent residence of the amputees on the local administrative level (197 geographic units) was used to identify potential healthcare (outpatient care, revascularisation activity) and socio-economic (educational attainment, local infrastructure and services, income and employment) determinants of amputations. Spatial effects were modelled using the spatial Durbin error regression model. Results: 10,209 patients underwent 11,649 lower limb major amputations in the observational period. In our spatial analysis, outpatient care was not associated with local amputation rates. However, revascularisation activity in a geographic unit entailed an increased rate of amputations, while revascularisations in the neighbouring areas were associated with a lower rate of amputations, resulting in an overall neutral effect (β=−0.002, 95% CI: −0.05 – 0.04, p=0.96). The local socio-economic environment had a significant direct inverse association with amputations (β=−7.45, 95% CI: −10.50 – −4.42, p<0.0001) . Our spatial model showed better performance than the traditional statistical modelling (ordinary least squares regression), explaining 37% of the variation in amputations rates. Conclusions: Regional environmental factors explain a substantial portion of spatial disparities in amputation practice. While the socio-economic environment shows a significant inverse relationship with the regional amputation rates, the impact of the local healthcare-related factors (outpatient care, revascularisation activity) is not straightforward. Unravelling the impact of the location on amputation practice requires complex spatial modelling, which may guide efficient healthcare policy decisions.

[Rehabilitation following the amputation of an extremity]

The rehabilitation of patients with an amputation is challenging and an example of an interdisciplinary team approach. Knowledge of the principal surgical techniques and the needs for a good prosthetic fitting is mandatory for the team members. According to the ideas of International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Handicaps the goal of the rehabilitation is to achieve the highest possible participation in private, work and social life of the patient. Within the team a clear definition of responsibilities is necessary, as well as an intensive communication structure. The patient himself plays a major role. This rehabilitation is complex, in terms of both personal and resource use. Depending on the level of amputation, the usual rehabilitation times range between 4 to 12 weeks for the lower extremity; for the arms, the time varies greatly from person to person. Longer rehabilitation times seem to ensure better treatment outcomes in the long term.

Regional variation of lower limb major amputations on different geographic scales - a Hungarian nationwide study over 13 years

Background: The incidence of lower limb major amputations is an important healthcare quality indicator, as it reflects all efforts aimed to prevent limb loss. Analysis of within-country regional variations in incidence may reveal the sources of disparities in care. Materials and methods: Based on the data of the Hungarian healthcare beneficiary population from 2004 to 2016, the incidence of lower limb major amputations and its spatial variations was determined regionally on four levels of geographic resolution. Variability and autocorrelation were quantified on different resolutions. Results: A total of 56,468 lower limb major amputation procedures were identified in 49,528 patients over the observation period. Marked regional variations were detected at all geographic scale levels. In the case of county-level and local administrative level, the systematic component of variation was 0.03 and 0.09, respectively. Only half of the variation at local administrative level was explained by county. Conclusions: Lower limb major amputations show marked regional variations on the different geographic levels of resolution. The more granular the assessment, the higher the regional variation was. Assumingly, this observation is partially a mathematical necessity but may also be related to the different characteristics of care at a given level of spatial aggregation. The decomposition of the variance of amputation rates indicates that the potential explanatory factors contributing to spatial variability are multiple and may be interpreted on different levels of geographic resolution. Addressing the unwarranted variations and resolving the issues that contribute to high lower limb major amputation rates needs further explorative analysis.

Diabetic foot and disaster; risk factors for amputation during the Syrian crisis

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot patients in Syria faced many challenges and difficulties during the recent long term crisis that has prevailed since 2011. This study establishes the risk factors of diabetic foot amputation, either minor or major amputation. It also suggests facilities to improve diabetic foot care in the disaster.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study that reviewed diabetic foot outpatients' charts between Jan 2012 and Dec 2017 in Diabetic Foot Clinic in Damascus Teaching Hospital, Syria. We classified the lesions according to the final outcome into: non-amputation, minor and major amputation. We predicted the independent risk factors of lower extremity amputation (LEA).

RESULTS

A total of 2317 diabetic patients visited our clinic regularly with 2722 diabetic foot symptoms. We studied 2006 lesions belong to 1630 diabetic foot patients. They were divided into: group A (outcome without amputation, n = 1372), group B (outcome with minor amputation, n = 528) and group C (final outcome with major amputation, n = 106). Males were slightly predominant (56.73%; n = 1138), but with clearly higher risk of major amputation (6.77%; n = 77). 15.10% of patients was older than 70 years, with no significant relationship between age and amputation risk. According to Meggitt-Wagner classification system, the major amputation rate was (5.28%) in the lesions grade 1 through 5, it went up to (87.30) in isolated grade 5 lesions. The study recorded a degree of infection in (42.07%; n = 844) of the cases. The amputation rate went up in this group of patients to 38.5% and 8.44% for minor and major amputation, respectively. The presence of peripheral occlusive artery disease (PAD) doubled the minor amputation incidence one time (44.02%), and major amputation incidence five times (15.16%). The heel ulcer showed a great tendency toward the major amputation (18.80%), while the incidence rate in the DFUs spared heel was (3.36%). The war injuries of the diabetic foot was followed up in three cases that were treated conservatively and didn't considered an independent risk factor for amputation as long as the standard care was applied.

CONCLUSION

This article is the first one that discussed the reality of the diabetic foot care in disasters. It figures out that diabetic foot patients are obviously at higher risk of neglect during the crisis. In the absence of early detecting of wounds, deformities and PAD, DFUs likely come to the podiatrists in advanced stages. The unhealthy environment drives DFUs toward injuries, cellulites and infection. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and local institutions that work in crisis areas should pay attention for special care requirements of diabetic foot patients, for the standard care of the diabetic foot and the regular follow-up till the healing eventually.

Potentials, challenges, and limitations of the analysis of administrative data on vascular limb amputations in health care

Although more and more data on lower limb amputations are becoming available by leveraging the widening access to health care administrative databases, the applicability of these data for public health decisions is still limited. Problems can be traced back to methodological issues, how data are generated and to conceptual issues, namely, how data are interpreted in a multidimensional environment. The present review summarised all of the steps from converting the claims data of administrative databases into the analytical data and reviewed the wide array of sources of potential biases in the analysis of such data. The origins of uncertainty of administrative data analysis include uncontrolled confounding due to a lack of clinical data, the left- and right-censored nature of data collection, the non-standardized diagnosis/procedure-based data extraction methods (i.e., numerator/denominator problems) and additional methodological problems associated with temporal and spatial analyses. The existence of these methodological challenges in the administrative data-based analysis should not deter the analysts from using these data as a powerful tool in the armamentarium of clinical research. However, it must be done with caution and a thorough understanding and respect of the methodological limitations. In addition to this requirement, there is a profound need for pursuing further research on methodology and widening the search for other indicators (structural, process or outcome) that allow a deeper insight how the quality of vascular care may be assessed. Effective research using administrative data is based on strong collaboration in three domains, namely expertise in claims data handling and processing, the clinical field, and statistical analysis. The final interpretations of results and the countermeasures on the level of vascular care ought to be grounded on the integrity of research, open discussions and institutionalized mechanisms of science arbitration and honest brokering.

Amputation rates of the lower limb by amputation level - observational study using German national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2015

BACKGROUND

In international comparisons, rates of amputations of the lower limb are relatively high in Germany. This study aims to analyze trends in lower limb amputations over time, as well as outcomes of care concerning in-hospital mortality and reamputation rates during the same hospital stay which might indicate the quality of surgical and perioperative health care processes.

METHODS

This work is an observational population-based study using complete national hospital discharge data (Diagnosis-Related Group Statistics (DRG Statistics)) from 2005 to 2015. All inpatient cases with lower limb amputation were identified and stratified by eight amputation levels. Time trends of case numbers and in-hospital mortality were studied age-sex standardized. For inpatient cases with reamputation during the same hospital stay, first and last amputation levels were cross tabulated.

RESULTS

A total of 55,595 amputations of the lower limb in 2015 (52,096 in 2005) were identified. After age-sex standardization to the demographic structure of 2005, a relative decrease of - 11.1% was revealed (men - 2.6%, women - 25.0%). The stratified analysis by amputation levels showed that the decreases were induced by higher amputation levels, whereas the amputation levels of toe/foot ray after standardization still showed a relative increase of + 12.8%. In-hospital mortality of all cases with lower limb amputation fell from 11.2% in 2005 to 7.7% in 2015 (SMR 0.89 [95% CI 0.86; 0.92]). The percentage of reamputations during the same hospital stay declined from 13.2 to 10.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of lower limb amputations declined in Germany, however distinctly stronger in women than in men. The observed decreases of in-hospital mortality as well as of reamputation rates point to improvements in perioperative health care. Despite these indications of improvements, the distinct increase in case numbers at the level of toe/foot ray calls for additional targeted prevention efforts, especially for patients with diabetes.

Incidence of lower extremity amputations in the diabetic compared with the non-diabetic population: A systematic review

Lower extremity amputation (LEA) in patients with diabetes results in high mortality, reduced quality of life, and increased medical costs. Exact data on incidences of LEA in diabetic and non-diabetic patients are important for improvements in preventative diabetic foot care, avoidance of fatal outcomes, as well as a solid basis for health policy and the economy. However, published data are conflicting, underlining the necessity for the present systematic review of population-based studies on incidence, relative risks and changes of amputation rates over time. It was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Nineteen out of 1582 studies retrieved were included in the analysis. The incidence of LEA in the diabetic population ranged from 78 to 704 per 100,000 person-years and the relative risks between diabetic and non-diabetic patients varied between 7.4 and 41.3. Study designs, statistical methods, definitions of major and minor amputations, as well as the methods to identify patients with diabetes differed greatly, explaining in part these considerable differences. Some studies found a decrease in incidence of LEA as well as relative risks over time. This obvious lack of evidence should be overcome by new studies using a standardized design with comparable methods and definitions.

Geographic Variation of the Incidence Rate of Lower Limb Amputation in Australia from 2007-12

In Australia, little is known about how the incidence rate (IR) of lower limb amputation (LLA) varies across the country. While studies in other economically developed countries have shown considerable geographic variation in the IR-LLA, mostly these have not considered whether the effect of common risk factors are the same across regions. Mapping variation of the IR-LLA, and the effect of common risk factors, is an important first step to focus research into areas of greatest need and support the development of regional specific hypotheses for in-depth examination. The aim of this study was to describe the geographic variation in the IR-LLA across Australia and understand whether the effect of common risk factors was the same across regions. Using hospital episode data from the Australian National Hospital Morbidity database and Australian Bureau of Statistics, the all-cause crude and age-standardised IR-LLA in males and females were calculated for the nation and each state and territory. Generalised Linear Models were developed to understand which factors influenced geographic variation in the crude IR-LLA. While the crude and age-standardised IR-LLA in males and females were similar in most states and territories, they were higher in the Northern Territory. The effect of older age, being male and the presence of type 2 diabetes was associated with an increase of IR-LLA in most states and territories. In the Northern Territory, the younger age at amputation confounded the effect of sex and type 2 diabetes. There are likely to be many factors not included in this investigation, such as Indigenous status, that may explain part of the variation in the IR-LLA not captured in our models. Further research is needed to identify regional- and population- specific factors that could be modified to reduce the IR-LLA in all states and territories of Australia.

The German and Belgian accreditation models for diabetic foot services

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot recommends that auditing should be part of the organization of diabetic foot care, the efforts required for data collection and analysis being balanced by the expected benefits. In Germany legislature demands measures of quality management for in- and out-patient facilities, and, in 2003, the Germany Working Group on the Diabetic Foot defined and developed a certification procedure for diabetic foot centres to be recognized as 'specialized'. This includes a description of management facilities, treatment procedures and outcomes, as well as the organization of mutual auditing visits between the centres. Outcome data is collected at baseline and 6 months on 30 consecutive patients. By 2014 almost 24,000 cases had been collected and analysed. Since 2005 Belgian multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinics could apply for recognition by health authorities. For continued recognition diabetic foot clinics need to treat at least 52 patients with a new foot problem (Wagner 2 or more or active Charcot foot) per annum. Baseline and 6-month outcome data of these patients are included in an audit-feedback initiative. Although originally fully independent of each other, the common goal of these two initiatives is quality improvement of national diabetic foot care, and hence exchanges between systems has commenced. In future, the German and Belgian accreditation models might serve as templates for comparable initiatives in other countries. Just recently the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot initiated a working group for further discussion of accreditation and auditing models (International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot AB(B)A Working Group).

Diabetic foot wounds: the value of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation

Chronic wounds such as diabetic foot wounds are a tremendous burden to the health care system and often require a multidisciplinary approach to prevent amputations. Advanced technologies such as negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and bioengineered tissues have been successfully used in the treatment of these types of complex wounds. However, the introduction of NPWT with instillation (NPWTi) has provided an alternative treatment for treating complex and difficult-to-heal wounds. This article provides an overview of NPWT and the new NPWTi system and describes preliminary experience using NPWTi on patients with complicated infected diabetic foot wounds after surgical debridement and in a multidisciplinary setting.

Lower limb amputation in Northern Netherlands: unchanged incidence from 1991-1992 to 2003-2004

BACKGROUND

Investigating population changes gives insight into effectiveness and need for prevention and rehabilitation services. Incidence rates of amputation are highly varied, making it difficult to meaningfully compare rates between studies and regions or to compare changes over time.

STUDY DESIGN

Historical cohort study of transtibial amputation, knee disarticulation, and transfemoral amputations resulting from vascular disease or infection, with/without diabetes, in 2003-2004, in the three Northern provinces of the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES

To report the incidence of first transtibial amputation, knee disarticulation, or transfemoral amputation in 2003-2004 and the characteristics of this population, and to compare these outcomes to an earlier reported cohort from 1991 to 1992.

METHODS

Population-based incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 person-years and compared across the two cohorts.

RESULTS

Incidence of amputation was 8.8 (all age groups) and 23.6 (≥45 years) per 100,000 person-years. This was unchanged from the earlier study of 1991-1992. The relative risk of amputation was 12 times greater for people with diabetes than for people without diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Investigation is needed into reasons for the unchanged incidence with respect to the provision of services from a range of disciplines, including vascular surgery, diabetes care, and multidisciplinary foot clinics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study shows an unchanged incidence of amputation over time and a high risk of amputation related to diabetes. Given the increased prevalence of diabetes and population aging, both of which present an increase in the population at risk of amputation, finding methods for reducing the rate of amputation is of importance.

Impact of health-care accessibility and social deprivation on diabetes related foot disease

AIMS

To determine whether geography and/or social deprivation influences the occurrence of foot ulcers or amputations in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of people with diabetes (n = 15 983) were identified between 2004 and 2006. Community and hospital data on diabetes care, podiatry care and onset of ulceration and amputation was linked using a unique patient identifier, which is used for all patient contacts with health-care professionals. Postcode was used to calculate social deprivation and distances to general practice and hospital care.

RESULTS

Over 3 years' follow-up 670 patients with diabetes developed new foot ulcers (42 per 1000) and 99 proceeded to amputation (6 per 1000). The most deprived quintile had a 1.7-fold (95% CI 1.2-2.3) increased risk of developing a foot ulcer. Distance from general practitioner or hospital clinic and lack of attendance at community retinal screening did not predict foot ulceration or amputation. Previous ulcer (OR 15.1, 95% CI 11.6-19.6), insulin use (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.1-3.5), absent foot pulses (5.9: 4.7-7.5) and impaired monofilament sensation (OR 6.5, 95% CI 5.0-8.4) all predicted foot ulceration. Previous foot ulcer, absent pulses and impaired monofilaments also predicted amputation.

CONCLUSION

Social deprivation is an important factor, especially for the development of foot ulcers. Geographical aspects such as accessibility to the general practitioner or hospital clinic are not associated with foot ulceration or amputation in this large UK cohort study.

Evaluation of rehabilitated bilateral lower limb amputees - an Indian study

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed activities of daily living (ADL) and ambulation of rehabilitated bilateral lower limb amputees with relation to their level of amputation in an Indian setting.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study of 25 subjects comprised 12 bilateral Trans-femoral (TF) amputees, 8 bilateral Trans-tibial (TT) amputees and 5 a combination of ipsilateral Trans-femoral and contralateral Trans-tibial amputation. All subjects were contacted by post/telephone, were physically examined and assessed at the Orthopaedic clinic at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years. Physical rehabilitation was evaluated using ADL score and by grading the level of ambulation.

RESULTS

ADL scores showed no significant difference according to level of amputation (p > 0.05), but the scores of prosthetic users were significantly higher than non-prosthetic users (p = 0.002). Only 11/25 amputees became prosthetic ambulators and most (50%, 6/12) were TF amputees. All prosthetically rehabilitated subjects were mobilising with their prostheses at follow-up and graded as unlimited or limited community ambulators.

CONCLUSION

Though it is well documented that the potential for successful rehabilitation is best for bilateral TT amputees, given the subjects' economic constraints, higher prosthesis rehabilitation among bilateral TF amputees indicates that successful rehabilitation is possible in most subjects irrespective of the level of amputation.

Incidence of lower-limb amputation in the diabetic and nondiabetic general population: a 10-year population-based cohort study of initial unilateral and contralateral amputations and reamputations

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of vascular lower-limb amputation (LLA) in the diabetic and nondiabetic general population.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A population-based cohort study was conducted in a representative Swedish region. All vascular LLAs (at or proximal to the transmetatarsal level) performed from 1997 through 2006 were consecutively registered and classified into initial unilateral amputation, contralateral amputation, or reamputation. The incidence rates were estimated in the diabetic and nondiabetic general population aged > or =45 years.

RESULTS

During the 10-year period, LLA was performed on 62 women and 71 men with diabetes and on 79 women and 78 men without diabetes. The incidence of initial unilateral amputation per 100,000 person-years was 192 (95% CI 145-241) for diabetic women, 197 (152-244) for diabetic men, 22 (17-26) for nondiabetic women, and 24 (19-29) for nondiabetic men. The incidence increased from the age of 75 years. Of all amputations, 74% were transtibial. The incidences of contralateral amputation and of reamputation per 100 amputee-years in diabetic women amputees were 15 (7-27) and 16 (8-28), respectively; in diabetic men amputees 18 (10-29) and 21 (12-32); in nondiabetic women amputees 14 (7-24) and 18 (10-28); and in nondiabetic men amputees 13 (6-22) and 24 (15-35).

CONCLUSIONS

In the general population aged > or =45 years, the incidence of vascular LLA at or proximal to the transmetatarsal level is eight times higher in diabetic than in nondiabetic individuals. One in four amputees may require contralateral amputation and/or reamputation.

[Epidemiology of diabetic foot problems]

Since diabetes mellitus is growing at epidemic proportions worldwide, the prevalence of diabetes-related complications is bound to increase. Diabetic foot disorders, a major source of disability and morbidity, are a significant burden for the community and a true public health problem. Many epidemiological data have been published on the diabetic foot but they are difficult to interpret because of variability in the methodology and in the definitions used in these studies. Moreover, there is a lack of consistency in population characteristics (ethnicity, social level, accessibility to care) and how results are expressed. In westernized countries, two of 100 diabetic patients are estimated to suffer from a foot ulcer every year. Amputation rates vary considerably: incidence ranges from 1 per thousand in the Madrid area and in Japan to up to 20 per thousand in some Indian tribes in North America. In metropolitan France, the incidence of lower-limb amputation is approximately 2 per thousand but with marked regional differences, and in French overseas territories, the incidence rate is much higher. Nevertheless, the risk for ulceration and amputation is much higher in diabetics compared to the nondiabetic population: the lifetime risk of a diabetic individual developing an ulcer is as high as 25% and it is estimated that every 30s an amputation is performed for a diabetic somewhere in the world. As reviewed in this paper, peripheral neuropathy, arterial disease, and foot deformities are the main factors accounting for this increased risk. Age and sex as well as social and cultural status are contributing factors. Knowing these factors is essential to classify every diabetic using a risk grading system and to take preventive measures accordingly.

Outcomes of allogenic acellular matrix therapy in treatment of diabetic foot wounds: an initial experience

The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of persons with UT grade 2A neuropathic diabetic foot wounds treated with an acellular matrix. Data were abstracted for 17 consecutive patients with diabetes--76.5% males, aged 61.5 +/- 8.5 years with a mean glycated haemoglobin of 9.2 +/- 2.2% presenting for care at a large, multidisciplinary wound care centre. All patients received surgical debridement for their diabetic foot wounds and were placed on therapy consisting of a single application of an acellular matrix graft (GraftJacket; Wright Medical Technologies, Arlington, TN, USA) with dressing changes taking place weekly. Outcomes evaluated included time to complete wound closure and proportion of patients achieving wound closure in 20 weeks. Acellular matrix therapy was used as initial therapy and was sutured or stapled in place under a silicone-based non adherent dressing. Therapy was then followed by a moisture-retentive dressing until complete epithelialisation. In total, 82.4% of wounds measuring a mean 4.6 +/- 3.2 cm(2) healed in the 20-week evaluation period. For those that healed in this period, healing took place in a mean 8.9 +/- 2.7 weeks. We conclude that a regimen consisting of moist wound healing using an acellular matrix dressing may be a useful adjunct to appropriate diabetic foot ulcer care for deep, non-infected, non-ischaemic wounds. We await the completion of further trials in this area to confirm or refute this initial assessment.

The pivotal role of offloading in the management of neuropathic foot ulceration

Lower extremity amputations among persons with diabetes are generally preceded by neuropathic foot ulcerations. Healing of diabetic ulcerations in a timely manner is of central importance in any plan for amputation prevention. With sufficient vascular supply, appropriate débridement, and infection control, the primary mode of healing a diabetic neuropathic foot ulcer is pressure dispersion. The total contact cast has been deemed by many to be the gold standard in offloading; however, modification of a standard removable cast walker to ensure patient compliance may be as efficacious in healing diabetic foot ulcers as the total contact cast. Combining an effective, easy to use offloading device that ensures patient compliance with advanced wound healing modalities may form a formidable team in healing ulcers and potentially averting lower limb amputations.

Amputation as a marker of the quality of foot care in diabetes

Strategic targets for the management of foot ulcers focus on reducing the incidence of amputation. While data on the incidence of amputation can be obtained relatively easily, the figures require very careful interpretation. Variation in the definition of amputation, population selection and the choice of numerator and denominator make comparisons difficult. Major and minor amputation have to be distinguished as they are undertaken for different reasons and are associated with different costs and functional implications. Many factors influence the decision of whether or not to remove a limb. In addition to disease severity, co-morbidities, and social and individual patient factors, many aspects of the structure of care services affect this decision, including access to primary care, quality of primary care, delays in referral, availability and quality of specialist resources, and prevailing medical opinion. It follows that a high incidence of amputation can reflect a higher disease prevalence, late referral, limited resources, or a particularly interventionist approach by a specialist team. Conversely, a low incidence of amputation can indicate a lower disease prevalence or severity, good management of diabetes in primary and secondary care, or a particularly conservative approach by an expert team. An inappropriately conservative approach could conceivably enhance suffering by condemning a person to months of incapacity before they die with an unhealed ulcer. The reported annual incidence of major amputation in industrialised countries ranges from 0.06 to 3.83 per 10(3) people at risk. Some centres have documented that the incidence is falling, but this is often from a baseline value that was unusually high. Other centres have reported that the incidence has not changed. The ultimate target is to achieve not only a decrease in incidence, but also a low overall incidence. This must be accompanied by improvements in morbidity, mortality, and patient function and mood.

Are we underestimating diabetes-related lower-extremity amputation rates? Results and benefits of the first prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to accurately determine the incidence of lower-extremity amputation using prospective data collection and to compare the results with those obtained by retrospective methods.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was carried out over a 3-year period in a large district general hospital covering a clearly defined and relatively static population. All diabetic inpatients with foot problems were identified and followed-up until discharge or death. The demographic and admission details, medical history, investigations, procedures, and history and etiology of the foot lesion were collected twice weekly by a specialist nurse and podiatrist from all relevant wards. Thus, all subjects who underwent amputation could be identified. For comparison, retrospective data were collected from the hospital coding activities database, operating theater log books, anesthetic database, and limb-fitting records.

RESULTS

The total population of the region in 2000 was 337,859, of which 9,183 were known to have diabetes. The total number of amputations during the 3-year survey period was 79, of which 45 were major and 34 minor. In our local population, the mean incidence during the survey period (1997-2000) equates to 7.8/100,000 general population and 2.85/1,000 diabetic population for all amputations, 4.5/100,000 general population and 1.62/1,000 diabetic population for major amputations, and 3.3/100,000 general population and 1.23/1,000 diabetic population for minor amputations. The prospective survey detected all lower-extremity amputations identified by the various retrospective methods; however, for the reverse, this was not the case. All of the retrospective methods, including the most commonly used (ICD-9 and OPCS-4 coding), failed to detect all of the cases revealed by the prospective survey (error rate ranging from 4.2 to 90.6%), and between 4.5 and 17.4% of amputations were misclassified.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the advantages of prospective data collection as a means of determining the incidence of lower-extremity amputations and highlights the limitations of retrospective data collection methods, which underestimate the incidence. In particular, the operating theater records, which have been the gold standard for many surveys, were found to be unreliable. Moreover, we have shown a 47% reduction in the major amputations during the survey period. Thus, we recommend that a prospective audit be incorporated into the activities of the specialist foot care team as a means of assessing and improving clinical care.

Diabetic foot ulcers

Ulceration of the foot in diabetes is common and disabling and frequently leads to amputation of the leg. Mortality is high and healed ulcers often recur. The pathogenesis of foot ulceration is complex, clinical presentation variable, and management requires early expert assessment. Interventions should be directed at infection, peripheral ischaemia, and abnormal pressure loading caused by peripheral neuropathy and limited joint mobility. Despite treatment, ulcers readily become chronic wounds. Diabetic foot ulcers have been neglected in health-care research and planning, and clinical practice is based more on opinion than scientific fact. Furthermore, the pathological processes are poorly understood and poorly taught and communication between the many specialties involved is disjointed and insensitive to the needs of patients.

Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To examine the state of research on population-based studies of the incidence of limb amputation and birth prevalence of limb deficiency.

DATA SOURCES

A total of 18 publication databases were searched, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library.

STUDY SELECTION

The search was performed by using a hierarchical process. Articles were reviewed for inclusion by 3 reviewers. Inclusion criteria included defined catchment area, calculation of population-based incidence rates, defined etiology of limb loss, and English language. Review articles, animal studies, case reports, cohort studies, letters, and editorials were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Figures on the estimated incidence of amputation and birth prevalence of congenital limb deficiency were gleaned from selected reports and assembled into a table format by etiology.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The studies varied in scope, quality, and methodology, making comparisons between studies difficult. Incidence rates of acquired amputation varied greatly between and within nations. Rates of all-cause acquired amputation ranged from 1.2 first major amputations per 10,000 women in Japan to 4.4 per 10,000 men in the Navajo Nation in the United States between 1992 and 1997. Consistent among all nations, the risk of amputation was greatest among persons with diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance of congenital limb deficiency exists in much of the developed world. Existing studies of acquired amputation suffer from a host of methodologic problems. Future efforts should be directed toward the application of standardized measures and methods to enable trends to be evaluated over time and comparisons to be made within and between countries.

Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort

OBJECTIVE

To report the incidence of diabetes-related lower-extremity complications in a cohort of patients enrolled in a diabetes disease management program.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We evaluated screening results and clinical outcomes for the first 1,666 patients enrolled in a disease management program for a period of 24 months (50.3% men, aged 69.1 +/- 11.1 years).

RESULTS

The incidence of ulceration, infection, amputation, and lower-extremity bypass was 68.4, 36.5, 5.9, and 7.7 per 1,000 persons with diabetes per year. Amputation incidence was higher in Mexican Americans than in non-Hispanic whites (7.4/1,000 vs. 4.1/1,000; P = 0.003, odds ratio [OR] 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7). The amputation-to-ulcer ratio was 8.7%. The incidence of Charcot arthropathy was 8.5/1,000 per year. Charcot was more common in non-Hispanic whites than in Mexican Americans (11.7/1,000 vs. 6.4/1,000; P = 0.0001, 1.8, 1.3-2.5). The prevalence of peripheral vascular disease was 13.5%, with no significant difference based on ethnicity (P = 0.3). There was not a significant difference in incidence of foot infection (P = 0.9), lower-extremity bypass (P = 0.3), or ulceration (P = 0.1) based on ethnicity. However, there were more failed bypasses in Mexican Americans (33%) than in non-Hispanic whites (7.1%). Mexican Americans were 3.8 times more likely to have a failed bypass (leading to an amputation) or be diagnosed as "nonbypassable" than non-Hispanic whites (75.0 vs. 44.0%; P = 0.01, 3.8, 1.2-11.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of amputation is higher in Mexican Americans, despite rates of ulceration, infection, vascular disease, and lower-extremity bypass similar to those of non-Hispanic whites. There may be factors associated with failed or failure to bypass that mandate further investigation.

Rates and characteristics of lower limb amputations in Taiwan, 1997

This study aims to describe the national incidence rate and characteristics of lower limb amputations (LLA) in 1997 from an island-wide database of the national health insurance programme in Taiwan. Some 117,647 discharge records from a sampled database (1 in 20) of the National Health Insurance Research Database were analysed. This study included records (n=171) containing LLA procedures. The LLA procedure rates were obtained by multiplying the number of identified procedures by 20 as the numerator and mid-year total population of Taiwan in 1997 as the denominator. Each procedure was further analysed according to the demographic characteristics of the patients, cause and level of amputation. Summarised gender ratios of LLA procedure rates were obtained by Poisson regression analysis. The crude LLA procedure rate was 18.1 per 100,000 population per year and the crude major LLA procedure rate was 8.8 per 100,000 population per year in Taiwan in 1997. The major cause of LLA procedures was peripheral vascular disease (72%), and the toe was most frequently amputated (48%). The LLA procedure rates, which increased logarithmically with age of patients, were significantly higher in men with a summarised male to female rate ratio of 1.65. The age-standardised LLA procedure rate in Taiwan was lower than that reported in the United States, Finland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom (Leeds, Middlesborough, and Newcastle), but higher than Spain, Italy, and Japan. The trend of an increasing proportion of PVD-related LLA procedures will prompt the health professionals to develop strategies for LLA prevention.

Geographic variation of lower-extremity major amputation in individuals with and without diabetes in the Medicare population

OBJECTIVE

To describe geographic variation in rates of lower-limb major amputation in Medicare patients with and without diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional population-based study used national fee-for-service Medicare claims from 1996 through 1997. The unit of analysis was 306 hospital referral regions (HRRs) representing health care markets for their respective tertiary medical centers. Numerators were calculated using nontraumatic major amputations and the diabetes code (250.x) for individuals with diabetes. Denominators for individuals with diabetes were created by multiplying the regional prevalence of diabetes (as determined using a 5% sample of Medicare Part B data identifying at least two visits with a diabetes code for 1995-1996) by the regional Medicare population. Denominators for individuals without diabetes were the remaining Medicare beneficiaries. Rates of major amputations were adjusted for age, sex, and race.

RESULTS

Rates of major amputations per year were 3.83 per 1,000 (95% CI 3.60-4.06) individuals with diabetes compared with 0.38 per 1,000 (95% C1 0.35-0.41) individuals without diabetes. Marked geographic variation was observed for individuals with and without diabetes; however, patterns were distinct between the two populations. Rates were high in the Southern and Atlantic states for individuals without diabetes. In contrast, rates for individuals with diabetes were widely varied. Variation across HRRs for individuals with diabetes was 8.6-fold compared with 6.7-fold in individuals without diabetes for major amputations.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes-related amputation rates exhibit high regional variation, even after age, sex, and race adjustment. Future work should be directed to exploring sources of this variation.

Mobility of people with lower limb amputations: scales and questionnaires: a review

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN

A systematic literature review to compare mobility scales used for lower limb amputees. A literature search was carried out by computerized search of biomedical literature including Medline and Embase. The studies included were published between 1978 and 1998 and including the following keywords: amputation, artificial limbs, prosthesis, lower limb, activities of daily living, mobility.

RESULTS

Thirty-five studies were identified; 19 had a measurement of separate levels of mobility comparable to each other. Sixteen studies used ordinal and ratio scales without separate levels of mobility. The widest range of measurement found was the scale from 'walking with prosthesis without a walking aid' to 'totally confined to bed'. The Stanmore Harold Wood mobility scale was published most frequently. None of the 35 studies presented give a continuous measurement of mobility.

CONCLUSION

A multitude of measurement scales and questionnaires are available for differ in methods and measuring range. Measuring mobility by a scale has been shown to have limitations. Several authors did extensive research but they all measure only a number of aspects of mobility. Consensus about the measurement of mobility of lower limb amputees is not available in the recent literature.

Nontraumatic lower extremity amputations in the Medicare end-stage renal disease population

BACKGROUND

Nontraumatic lower limb amputation is a serious complication of both diabetic neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease. Many people with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) suffer from advanced progression of these diseases. This study presents descriptive information on the rate of lower limb amputation among people with ESRD who are covered by the Medicare program.

METHODS

Using hospital bill data for the years 1991 through 1994 from the Health Care Financing Administration's ESRD program management and medical information system (PMMIS), amputations were based on ICD9 coding. These hospitalizations were then linked back to the PMMIS enrollment database for calculation of rates.

RESULTS

The rate of lower limb amputation increased during the four-year period from 4.8 per 100 person years in 1991 to 6.2 in 1994. Among persons whose renal failure was attributed to diabetic nephropathy, the rates in 1991 and 1994 were 11.8 and 13.8, respectively. The rate among diabetic persons with ESRD was 10 times as great as among the diabetic population at large. Two thirds died within two years following the first amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESRD population is at an extremely high risk of lower limb amputation. Coordinated programs to screen for high-risk feet and to provide regular foot care for those at high risk combined with guidelines for treatment and referral of ulceration are needed.

Methodological issues affect variability in reported incidence of lower extremity amputations due to diabetes

The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of different methodological techniques commonly utilized to identify the incidence of diabetes related lower extremity amputations. Medical records for each hospitalization for an amputation in 1993 in six metropolitan statistical areas in South Texas were abstracted. Every hospitalization, amputation and amputee was identified to allow separate analysis. Furthermore, data was categorized by ethnicity, level and age. Diabetes was verified using WHO criteria. Incidence rates were calculated per 10,000 diabetic patients at risk per year, both diagnosed only (DO) and diagnosed and undiagnosed combined (DUC). In total 1922 amputations were carried out during 1228 hospitalizations for 1043 amputees. The incidence rates per 10,000 diabetic patients (DO) were: 157.6 amputations, 101.2 hospitalizations and 87.0 amputees. When calculated using the DUC population at risk the rates were: 92.8 amputations, 59.6 hospitalizations and 51.2 amputees. Trends were found to be similar when analyzed by gender and ethnicity. The variability detected using of different methodological techniques to determine incidence rates is considerable and may have significant consequences when rates from different studies are compared.

Institutionalization following diabetes-related lower extremity amputation

PURPOSE

We are unaware of any report in the medical literature that has discussed risk factors for both mortality and discharge disposition following lower extremity amputation (LEA). Our aim was to report risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality and the need for institutional care in diabetics with LEAs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We abstracted data for every hospitalization for a LEA from January 1 to December 31, 1993 in six metropolitan statistical areas in South Texas. Amputation level was categorized as foot, leg, or thigh. Discharge status categories were: home, nursing home, rehabilitation facility, and death. We used the Kaplan scale of cogent comorbidities to determine the relationship of 12 disease categories and their association with discharge status.

RESULTS

There were 1,043 LEAs in South Texas in 1993. Although only 2.3% of the population was admitted from an institutional care facility, over 25% were discharged to one. Of the total population, 18.5% were discharged to a nursing home and 7.0% to a rehabilitation facility, and 5.1% died within the period of hospitalization. We performed a univariate analysis. Factors with a P <0.25 were included in a stepwise logistic regression analysis with an alpha of 0.05. High level (leg or thigh) amputation, peripheral vascular disease, male gender, and absence of advanced locomotor impairment were associated with discharge to a rehabilitation facility. For discharge to a nursing home, significant associations were found with: female gender, advanced age (>65 years), single marital status, high level amputation, and advanced cerebrovascular disease and locomotor impairment. Death following LEA was strongly associated with female gender, high level amputation, advanced renal disease, anemia, and congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSION

A significant number of patients either die or require long-term care following a diabetes-related LEA, thus further adding to the burden of this sequela. Several clinical parameters are significantly associated with discharge status after this procedure. More prospective clinical research is needed to verify the associations and to clarify their application in practice.

The impact of gender on amputation

The purpose of this report is to compare the proportion of lower extremity amputations among men and women with and without diabetes mellitus. We abstracted data from a database supplied by the State of New York for 14,555 nontraumatic amputations performed from 1990 through 1991, 58.8% of which were performed on patients with diabetes mellitus. We categorized amputations into three different levels (foot, leg, and thigh). Fifty-seven percent of the diabetes mellitus group were male, compared with 50% of the nondiabetic group. Men were younger than women regardless of the level of amputation in both the diabetic and nondiabetic population. Men with and without diabetes were significantly more likely to have a foot amputation, while diabetic and nondiabetic women were more likely to have a thigh amputation. When controlling for age, prevalence of vascular disease was not significantly different by gender in diabetic and nondiabetic groups at all amputation levels.