Reduction of portal pressure by acute administration of furosemide in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis

Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin predicts mortality and identifies acute kidney injury in cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

Kidney failure predicts mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Identification of kidney failure etiology and recognition of those at the highest mortality risk remains a challenge.

AIMS

We hypothesized that urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) predicts mortality and identifies hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

Prospectively enrolled patients with cirrhosis were investigated by uNGAL immunoblot upon hospital admission. Kidney failure type was determined blinded to NGAL measurements.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen patients were enrolled. Fifty-two (44 %) patients had normal kidney function, 14 (12 %) stable chronic kidney disease, 17 (14 %) prerenal azotemia, 20 (17 %) HRS, and 15 (13 %) intrinsic acute kidney injury (iAKI). Patients with HRS had uNGAL levels intermediate between prerenal azotemia [median (IQR) 105 (27.5-387.5) vs. 20 (15-45) ng/mL, p = 0.004] and iAKI [325 (100-700), p < 0.001]. Fifteen (13 %) patients died. In unadjusted analysis, uNGAL predicted inpatient mortality (OR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.36-2.94) and mortality or liver transplantation (OR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.42-2.85). In multiple regression models, uNGAL > 110 ng/mL (OR 6.05, 95 % CI 1.35-27.2) and HRS (OR 6.71, 95 % CI 1.76-25.5) independently predicted mortality, adjusting for age and serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

uNGAL strongly predicts short-term inpatient mortality in both unadjusted and adjusted models. Patients with HRS may have uNGAL levels intermediate between those with prerenal azotemia and iAKI. Further studies are needed to determine if uNGAL can improve discrimination of HRS from other types of acute kidney injury and predict short- and long-term cirrhosis outcomes.

Quantitative modeling of the physiology of ascites in portal hypertension

Although the factors involved in cirrhotic ascites have been studied for a century, a number of observations are not understood, including the action of diuretics in the treatment of ascites and the ability of the plasma-ascitic albumin gradient to diagnose portal hypertension. This communication presents an explanation of ascites based solely on pathophysiological alterations within the peritoneal cavity. A quantitative model is described based on experimental vascular and intraperitoneal pressures, lymph flow, and peritoneal space compliance. The model's predictions accurately mimic clinical observations in ascites, including the magnitude and time course of changes observed following paracentesis or diuretic therapy.

Afferent mechanisms of sodium retention in cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome

Cirrhosis induces extra-cellular fluid volume expansion, which when the disease is advanced can be severe and poorly responsive to therapy. Prevention and/or effective therapy for cirrhotic edema requires understanding the stimulus that initiates and maintains sodium retention. Despite much study, this stimulus remains unknown. Work over the last several years has shown that signals originating in the liver can influence a variety of systemic functions, including extra-cellular fluid volume control. We review work on the afferent mechanisms triggering sodium retention in cirrhosis and suggest that the data are most consistent with the existence of a sensor in the hepatic circulation that contributes to normal extra-cellular fluid volume control (that is, a 'volume' sensor) and that in cirrhosis, the sensor is pathologically activated by the hepatic circulatory abnormalities caused by the disease. Detailed analysis of the hepatic circulation in normal conditions and cirrhosis is needed.

[Hyperdynamic circulation in patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension]

Hyperdynamic circulation in patients with liver cirrhosis is characterized by increased cardiac output and heart rate, and decreased systemic vascular resistance with low arterial blood pressure and currently focused on understanding the pathogenesis because of possibility of developing novel treatment modality. Basically, these hemodynamic alternations arise from portal hypertension. Portosystemic collaterals develop to counterbalance the increased intrahepatic vascular resistance to portal blood flow and induce an increase in venous return to heart. Increased shear stress in vascular endothelial cell related high blood flow by portosystemic shunting contributes to this upregulation of eNOS resulting in NO overproduction. Additionally, bypassing through portosystemic collaterals and escaping degradation of over-produced circulating vasodilators in the diseased liver can promote the peripheral arterial vasodilation. Vasodilation of the systemic and splanchnic circulations lead to a reduced systemic vascular resistance, and increased cardiac output and splanchnic blood flow. Furthermore, neurohumoral vasoconstrictive systems including systemic nervous system, rennin angiotensin aldosterone system, and vasopressin are intensively activated secondary to vasodilation. However, hyperdynamic circulation would be more aggravated by the activated vasoconstrictive systems. With the progression of the cirrhotic process, hyperdynamic alternations can be more profound due to hyporesponsiveness to vasoconstrictors and increased shunt formation in conjunction with autonomic neuropathy. Eventually, splanchnic arterial vasodilation results in an increase portal venous inflow, maintaining the elevated portal venous pressure. Hyperdynamic circulation is intimately involved in portal hypertension with liver cirrhosis, therefore it is reasonable to have an interest in complete understanding of the pathogenesis of hyperdynamic circulation to develop novel treatment modality.

The effects of treatment with octreotide, diuretics, or both on portal hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites

GOALS

To evaluate the effects of diuretic treatment, octreotide, or both on portal hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites.

BACKGROUND

Diuretics and octreotide have been associated with a decrease in portal pressure in cirrhotic patients, suggested to be mediated by plasma volume depletion and splanchnic vasoconstriction, respectively. However, liver cirrhosis is characterized by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, which increases hepatic vascular resistance and is augmented or suppressed by diuretics or octreotide, respectively.

STUDY

Twenty nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites were treated with furosemide and spironolactone. Of them, 10 (group 1) discontinued diuretic treatment for 7 days. Thereafter for 5 days, each patient received subcutaneous octreotide, 300 microg twice per day; ten of them (group 2) received the octreotide in addition to their usual diuretic treatment. Portal and systemic hemodynamics with Doppler ultrasound and endogenous vasoactive systems were evaluated while the patients received diuretics (both groups), after discontinuation of diuretics (group 1), and after octreotide administration (both groups).

RESULTS

The withdrawal of diuretics did not alter portal hemodynamics, but it impaired systemic hemodynamics and suppressed the renin-aldosterone axis. The addition of octreotide to diuretic treatment but not octreotide alone improved portal and systemic hemodynamics. In both groups the initiation of octreotide administration suppressed the renin-aldosterone axis and plasma glucagon levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites, the combination of diuretics and octreotide improves systemic hemodynamics and inhibits the diuretic-related component of the activated renin-aldosterone axis, which in turn augments the portal hypotensive effect of diuretic-induced plasma volume depletion.

Management of portal hypertension

Treatment of portal hypertension is evolving based on randomised controlled trials. In acute variceal bleeding, prophylactic antibiotics are mandatory, reducing mortality as well as preventing infections. Terlipressin or somatostatin combined with endoscopic ligation or sclerotherapy is the best strategy for control of bleeding but there is no added effect of vasoactive drugs on mortality. Non-selective beta-blockers are the first choice therapy for both secondary and primary prevention; if contraindications or intolerance to beta-blockers are present then band ligation should be used. Novel therapies target the increased intrahepatic resistance caused by microcirculatory intrahepatic deficiency of nitric oxide and contraction of activated intrahepatic stellate cells.

Pathogenesis of portal hypertension

Portal hypertension is defined by an elevation in portal pressure and is associated with haemodynamic alterations. Haemodynamic changes are characterized by a hyperdynamic circulation in the splanchnic and systemic territories and a reduced pressure effect of vasoconstrictive substances. They were observed in both patients and animals with different types of portal hypertension. In this review, the main results and their mechanisms of the splanchnic and systemic haemodynamic alterations in portal hypertension are discussed.

Drug treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices

At the time of diagnosis of cirrhosis, varices are present in about 60% of decompensated and 30% of compensated patients. The risk factors for the first episode of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients are the severity of liver dysfunction, a large size of the varices and the presence of endoscopic red colour signs, but only a third of patients who suffer variceal haemorrhage demonstrate the above risk factors. The only treatment that does not require sophisticated equipment or the skills of a specialist, and is immediately available, is vasoactive drug therapy. Hence, drug therapy should be considered to be the initial treatment of choice and can be administered while the patient is transferred to hospital, as has been done in one recent study. Moreover, drug therapy is no longer considered to be only a 'stop-gap' therapy until definitive endoscopic therapy is performed. Several recent trials have reported an efficacy similar to that of emergency sclerotherapy in the control of variceal bleeding. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that those patients with high variceal or portal pressure are likely to continue to bleed or re-bleed early, implying that prolonged therapy lowering the portal pressure over several days may be the optimal treatment. Pharmacological treatment with beta-blockers is safe, effective and the standard long-term treatment for the prevention of recurrence of variceal bleeding. The combination of beta-blockers with isosorbide-5-mononitrate needs further testing in randomized controlled trials. The use of haemodynamic targets for the reduction of the HVPG response needs further study, and surrogate markers of the pressure response need evaluation. Ligation has recently been compared with beta-blockers for primary prophylaxis, but there is as yet no good evidence to recommend banding for primary prophylaxis if beta-blockers can be given.

Continuous blood pressure monitoring in cirrhosis. Relations to splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Low arterial blood pressure is recognised as a distinctive factor in the hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis. 24-hour monitoring of the blood pressure and heart rate has recently revealed a reduced circadian variation with relation to liver function. However, associations with other clinical and haemodynamic characteristics have not been investigated and the aim of the present study was to identify splanchnic and systemic determinants of the 24-h blood pressure and heart rate in cirrhosis.

METHODS

The variables were measured by an automatic ambulant device for monitoring blood pressure and related to the results of an invasive haemodynamic investigation, including measurements of intra-arterial blood pressure (9.00-11.00 h) in 37 patients with cirrhosis.

RESULTS

The 24-h blood pressures were significantly lower and the heart rate was significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis than in matched controls (p < 0.05-0.001). To identify determinants of 24-h or intra-arterial blood pressures and heart rate, pertinent variables were included in a multivariate regression model. This model revealed that independent determinants of a low 24-h arterial blood pressure were a high post-sinusoidal resistance, a low plasma volume, a short central circulation time, and the presence of ascites. In contrast, a low intra-arterial blood pressure was determined by a low serum sodium, a low haemoglobin, and a high cardiac output. Diuretic treatment did not influence this model.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the 24-h blood pressure and the intra-arterial blood pressure were determined by different variables, the overall results indicate that abnormalities in both splanchnic and central haemodynamics and sodium-water retention are important in the pathophysiology of arterial hypotension in patients with portal hypertension.

Continuous prazosin administration in cirrhotic patients: effects on portal hemodynamics and on liver and renal function

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatic vascular resistance is influenced by alpha-adrenergic tone. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of continuous blockade of alpha-adrenoceptors with prazosin on hemodynamics, liver function, and renal function and whether the association of propranolol or furosemide enhances the portal pressure lowering effect of prazosin.

METHODS

Cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension were studied at baseline and after a 3-month course of prazosin (n = 18) or placebo (n = 10).

RESULTS

No changes were observed in the placebo group. Prazosin decreased the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) while increasing hepatic blood flow. Liver function improved as shown by an increase in hepatic and intrinsic hepatic clearances of indocyanine green and galactose elimination capacity. A significant reduction in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance was associated with increases in plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentration and a decrease in glomerular filtration rate. The plasma volume increased significantly, and 6 patients developed edema. The association of propranolol (n = 8) but not furosemide (n = 7) to prazosin increased the reduction in HVPG and attenuated the increase in plasma renin activity.

CONCLUSIONS

In cirrhotic patients, continuous prazosin administration reduces portal pressure and improves liver perfusion and function but favors sodium and water retention. The association of propranolol enhances the decrease in portal pressure, suggesting a potential benefit from this combined therapy.

Effects of low-sodium diet and spironolactone on portal pressure in patients with compensated cirrhosis

The aim of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic effects of spironolactone associated with a low-sodium diet (n = 14) or a low-sodium diet alone (n = 9) in patients with compensated cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Spironolactone significantly reduced the plasma volume. This effect was associated with a significant reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient, from 17.6 +/- 3.6 mm Hg to 15.3 +/- 3.5 mm Hg (-13% +/- 13%; p < 0.01). Azygos blood flow (-20% +/- 20%), cardiac output (-16.2% +/- 10.5%) and mean arterial pressure (-9% +/- 9%) also decreased significantly. However, there were no significant changes in hepatic blood flow. Patients receiving low-sodium diet alone experienced a mild but significant reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (-6.3% +/- 6%) and in mean arterial pressure (-4% +/- 5%). There were no significant changes in cardiac output and in hepatic or azygos blood flows. This study indicates that low-sodium diet plus administration of spironolactone reduces portal pressure and azygos blood flow in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Low-sodium diet alone only produces mild effects that are likely to be clinically irrelevant.

Hemodynamic effects of acute administration of furosemide in patients with cirrhosis receiving beta-adrenergic antagonists

In patients with cirrhosis, both beta-blockers and diuretics decrease the degree of portal hypertension. Since their mechanisms of action differ, the combination of these two substances should induce a more pronounced effect on portal pressure than one of these substances alone. Thus, the hemodynamic effects of furosemide were evaluated in ten patients with cirrhosis receiving beta-blockers. One hour after furosemide (0.75 mg/kg intravenously) administration, cardiac output decreased significantly from 6.2 +/- 0.6 to 5.2 +/- 0.3 l/min and blood volume from 8.0 +/- 1.6 to 5.3 +/- 0.5 l. Mean arterial pressure was not affected. Wedged and free hepatic venous pressures did not change significantly; nor did the hepatic venous pressure gradient (19.6 +/- 1.7 to 18.6 +/- 1.5 mmHg). Azygos blood flow was not affected (0.46 +/- 0.05 to 0.50 +/- 0.07 l/min). In conclusion, this study did not demonstrate that the addition of furosemide to propranolol further decreased portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. The long-term effects of this combination are unknown and should be tested.

Pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension: hemodynamic effects and prevention of bleeding

In the past 10 years, it has been clearly shown that vasoactive substances reduce portal pressure in patients or animals with portal hypertension. Some of these substances act by inducing splanchnic vasoconstriction, while others reduce hepatic and porto-systemic collateral vascular resistance and, thus, induce a portal hypotensive effect. Still others induce arterial hypotension, which causes a vasoconstrictive effect in the splanchnic territory. Since these drugs act on different vascular receptors, their combination should have a more marked effect on portal hypertension. Up to now, only nonselective beta-blockers have been used in the prevention of first gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices and in the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. These trials have shown that propranolol or nadolol significantly reduce either a first episode of bleeding or recurrent bleeding. This pharmacological treatment also improves the survival rate in these patients. All of these studies have helped us to understand, in part, why gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurs in certain patients. Additional studies of beta-blockers or other substances are, nevertheless, necessary to select patients who will respond to this type of treatment. Finally, it is possible that the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension may also be used before esophageal varices occur.

Plasma volume contraction in portal hypertension

The effect of blood volume contraction induced by a 4-week regimen of spironolactone (100 mg/day) or furosemide (40 mg/day) on the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), an indicator of portal hypertension, was evaluated in patients with cirrhosis and no ascites. In the spironolactone group (n = 15), HVPG decreased significantly from 16.5 +/- 0.9 mmHg (mean +/- S.E.M.) to 12.9 +/- 1.0 mmHg (P < 0.005) and total blood volume contracted significantly from 4338 +/- 231 ml to 4006 +/- 203 ml (n = 14, P < 0.01). Although the HVPG changes did not correlate significantly with changes in measured total blood volume or in simultaneously determined systemic haemodynamics, a significant inverse correlation (r = -0.74, P < 0.01, n = 12) was found between the HVPG change and posttreatment plasma aldosterone levels, attesting to the effectiveness of spironolactone therapy in lowering HVPG. In the furosemide group (n = 10), neither HVPG (13.7 +/- 0.3 mmHg vs. 13.6 +/- 0.9 mmHg) nor total blood volume (4961 +/- 153 ml vs. 4964 +/- 162 ml) declined significantly. These results show that long-term administration of spironolactone to patients with cirrhosis and no ascites produced a significant reduction in HVPG that may have been due to gradual, sustained volume contraction. Thus, spironolactone may prove to be an effective treatment for portal hypertension in cirrhosis without ascites.

Renal prostacyclin influences renal function in non-azotemic cirrhotic patients treated with furosemide

The influence of prostaglandins on renal function changes induced by furosemide was analyzed in 21 non-azotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. Patients were studied in two periods of 120 min immediately before and after furosemide infusion (20 mg, ev). Furosemide caused an increase in creatinine clearance in 15 patients (group A: 99 +/- 7 vs. 129 +/- 5 ml/min; mean +/- S.E.) and a reduction in the remaining six (group B: 102 +/- 13 vs. 71 +/- 9 ml/min). Parallel changes were observed in the urinary excretion of 6-Keto-prostaglandin-F1 alpha (metabolite of renal prostacyclin) which augmented after furosemide in 14 of the 15 patients from group A (478 +/- 107 vs. 1034 +/- 159 pg/min, p less than 0.001) and decreased in all patients from group B (1032 +/- 240 vs. 548 +/- 136 pg/min, p less than 0.05). In contrast, the urinary excretion of prostaglandin E2 was stimulated by furosemide in all patients (group A, 92 +/- 19 vs. 448 +/- 60 pg/min, p less than 0.001; and group B, 209 +/- 63 vs. 361 +/- 25 pg/min, p less than 0.05). In all of the patients furosemide-induced changes (post- minus pre-furosemide values) in creatinine clearance were closely correlated in a direct and linear fashion with those in 6-Keto-prostaglandin-F1 alpha (r = 0.74; p less than 0.001). These changes were associated with a higher furosemide-induced natriuresis in group A than in group B (641 +/- 68 vs. 302 +/- 46 mumol/min, p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)