Mode of hepatitis C infection not associated with blood transfusion among chronic hemodialysis patients

Splenic Arterial Pulsatility Index to Predict Hepatic Fibrosis in Hemodialysis Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

The clinical utility of the splenic arterial pulsatility index (SAPI), a duplex Doppler ultrasonographic index, to predict the stage of hepatic fibrosis in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains elusive. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study to include 296 hemodialysis patients with HCV who underwent SAPI assessment and liver stiffness measurements (LSMs). The levels of SAPI were significantly associated with LSMs (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.413, p < 0.001) and different stages of hepatic fibrosis as determined using LSMs (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: 0.529, p < 0.001). The areas under receiver operating characteristics (AUROCs) of SAPI to predict the severity of hepatic fibrosis were 0.730 (95% CI: 0.671-0.789) for ≥F1, 0.782 (95% CI: 0.730-0.834) for ≥F2, 0.838 (95% CI: 0.781-0.894) for ≥F3, and 0.851 (95% CI: 0.771-0.931) for F4. Furthermore, the AUROCs of SAPI were comparable to those of the fibrosis index based on four parameters (FIB-4) and superior to those of the aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI). The positive predictive value (PPV) for ≥F1 was 79.5% when the Youden index was set at 1.04, and the negative predictive values (NPVs) for ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 were 79.8%, 92,6%, and 96.9%, respectively, when the maximal Youden indices were set at 1.06, 1.19, and 1.30. The diagnostic accuracies of SAPI with the maximal Youden index for a fibrosis stage of ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 were 69.6%, 67.2%, 75.0%, and 85.1%, respectively. In conclusion, SAPI can serve as a good noninvasive index in predicting the severity of hepatic fibrosis in hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection.

Updated Evidence on the Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Virus in Hemodialysis

Prevalence rates of HCV infection are decreasing in hemodialysis units of most developed countries; however, nosocomial transmission of HCV continues to occur in the hemodialysis setting, not only in the emerging world. According to the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS, 2012–2015), the prevalence of HCV among patients on regular hemodialysis was 9.9%; in incident patients, the frequency of HCV was approximately 5%. Outbreaks of HCV have been investigated by epidemiologic and phylogenetic data obtained by sequencing of the HCV genome; no single factor was retrieved as being associated with nosocomial transmission of HCV within hemodialysis units. Transmission of HCV within HD units can be prevented successfully by full compliance with infection control practices; also, antiviral treatment and serologic screening for anti-HCV can be useful in achieving this aim. Infection control practices in hemodialysis units include barrier precautions to prevent exposure to blood-borne pathogens and other procedures specific to the hemodialysis environment. Isolating HCV-infected hemodialysis patients or using dedicated dialysis machines for HCV-infected patients are not currently recommended; reuse of dialyzers of HCV-infected patients should be made, according to recent guidelines. Randomized controlled trials regarding the impact of isolation on the risk of transmission of HCV to hemodialysis patients have not been published to date. At least two studies showed complete elimination of de novo HCV within HD units by implementation of strict infection control practices without isolation practices. De novo HCV within hemodialysis units has been independently associated with facility HCV prevalence, dialysis vintage, and low staff-to-patient ratio. Antiviral treatment of HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis should not replace the implementation of barrier precautions and other routine hemodialysis unit procedures.

APASL clinical practice recommendation: how to treat HCV-infected patients with renal impairment?

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those on hemodialysis due to nosocomial infections and past blood transfusions. While a majority of HCV-infected patients with end-stage renal disease are asymptomatic, some may ultimately experience decompensated liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Administration of a combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks leads to high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in patients with HCV genotypes (GTs) 1a, 1b or 4 and stage 4 or 5 CKD. Furthermore, a combination of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8-16 weeks also results in high SVR rates in patients with all HCV GTs and stage 4 or 5 CKD. However, these regimens are contraindicated in the presence of advanced decompensated cirrhosis. Although sofosbuvir and/or ribavirin are not generally recommended for HCV-infected patients with severe renal impairment, sofosbuvir-based regimens may be appropriate for those with mild renal impairment. To eliminate HCV worldwide, HCV-infected patients with renal impairment should be treated with interferon-free therapies.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis: Current concepts

A variety of epidemiological data provides evidence for the occurrence of nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection to hemodialysis (HD) patients. The most important factor implicated in HCV transmission between patients treated in the same dialysis unit is cross-contamination from supplies and surfaces as a result of failure of staff to follow infection control procedures. Parts of the HCV genome are highly variable and lend themselves to fingerprinting of each isolate using nucleic acid testing (NAT) and sequencing. This approach has permitted investigation of possible transmission routes within HD units. A systematic review of molecular virology papers revealed transmission of HCV via internal fluid pathways of the dialysis machines in a minority of reports only. Dialyzer reuse was not identified as a risk factor for HCV acquisition in multicenter databases. No randomized controlled trials exist on the impact of isolation on the risk of transmission of HCV to hemodialysis patients. A Belgian prospective multicenter study showed a reduction from 1.4% to 0% in the annual incidence of seroconversion for HCV without any isolation measures, by implementation of strict infection control procedures designed to prevent transmission of blood-borne pathogens, including HCV. However, an isolation policy for HCV-infected dialysis patients should be considered in dialysis units where nosocomial transmission of HCV persists despite reinforcement and audit of hygienic precautions for hemodialysis. Routine audit precautions (general and for dialysis machines) are recommended on a regular basis within HD units.

Outbreak of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in a Hemodialysis Unit: Potential Transmission by the Hemodialysis Machine?

Objective:

To identify the routes of transmission during an outbreak of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2a/2c in a hemodialysis unit.

Design:

A matched case-control study was conducted to identify risk factors for HCV seroconversion. Direct observation and staff interviews were conducted to assess infection control practices. Molecular methods were used in a comparison of HCV infecting isolates from the case-patients and from patients infected with the 2a/2c genotype before admission to the unit.

Setting:

A hemodialysis unit treating an average of 90 patients.

Patients:

A case-patient was defined as a patient receiving hemodialysis with a seroconversion for HCV genotype 2a/2c between January 1994 and July 1997 who had received dialysis in the unit during the 3 months before the onset of disease. For each case-patient, 3 control-patients were randomly selected among all susceptible patients treated in the unit during the presumed contamination period of the case-patient.

Results:

HCV seroconversion was associated with the number of hemodialysis sessions undergone on a machine shared with (odds ratio [OR] per additional session, 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.9 to 1.8) or in the same room as (OR per additional session, 1.1; CI95, 1.0 to 1.2) a patient who was anti-HCV (genotype 2a/2c) positive. We observed several breaches in infection control procedures. Wetting of transducer protectors in the external pressure tubing sets with patient blood reflux was observed, leading to a potential contamination by blood of the pressure-sensing port of the machine, which is not accessible to routine disinfection. The molecular analysis of HCV infecting isolates identified among the case-patients revealed two groups of identical isolates similar to those of two patients infected before admission to the unit.

Conclusions:

The results suggest patient-to-patient transmission of HCV by breaches in infection control practices and possible contamination of the machine. No additional cases have occurred since the reinforcement of infection control procedures and the use of a second transducer protector.

Risk factors for hepatitis C virus sero-positivity among haemodialysis patients receiving care at kidney centre in a tertiary health facility in Maiduguri, Nigeria

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important health care problem in haemodialysis. Hepatitis C virus is both a cause and complication of kidney diseases. Yet there are limited information on antibody against HCV in patients on haemodialysis. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of anti-HCV and the risk factors associated with HCV infection in a cohort of 100 participants on haemodialysis. They were consecutively recruited into the study, anti-HCV testing was made by the 3rd-generation ELISA System (C-100, C-33c, C-22). The prevalence of HCV antibody was 15%, risk factors associated with HCV antibody were history of blood transfusion and duration of session of haemodialysis; the risk increased with increased with the number of blood transfusion and seasons of haemodialysis. The observed high prevalence of HCV antibody among patients on haemodialysis reflect the quality of healthcare services and the standards of infection control practices in our haemodialysis units. Routine screening for HCV should be done before blood transfusion using third generation ELISA assays with high sensitivity and specificity. Safety measures should be taken in our haemodialysis units to prevent cross infection among patients and staffs. These safety measures include; discarding syringes, needles, gloves, bloodlines and dialysers after single use, and the use of sterile dressings on each patient visit.

Hepatitis C virus screening and management of seroconversions in hemodialysis facilities

Over the past two decades, healthcare-associated exposure has increasingly been proved to be a means of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission, especially in hemodialysis facilities. The prevalence of HCV among hemodialysis patients is known to be several times greater than that of the general population of the United States, and chronic HCV infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality among these patients. During 2008-2011, HCV infection outbreaks were identified in multiple US hemodialysis facilities, resulting in at least 46 new HCV infections among hemodialysis patients. These outbreaks, linked to infection control breaches, also highlight the failure of some facilities to follow established guidelines for routine HCV antibody (anti-HCV) screening and response to new HCV infection among hemodialysis patients. Current national guidelines recommend screening of hemodialysis patients for anti-HCV on facility admission and, for susceptible patients, on a semiannual basis. Here, we seek to underscore the importance of compliance with national recommendations for anti-HCV screening of hemodialysis patients and actions to be taken in the event of possible HCV transmission within a hemodialysis facility. These include general steps to ensure that: hemodialysis patients are routinely screened for anti-HCV to facilitate early detection of new infections; newly infected patients are informed of the change in their HCV status and undergo clinical evaluation; and public health officials are notified of new HCV infections in a timely manner. We then focus on the need to assess infection control practices at the facility, with particular attention given to safe handling of injectable medications, hand hygiene and disinfection practices. In the absence of a vaccine, routine screening and adherence to standard infection control practices will remain the key strategies for preventing HCV transmission in hemodialysis units.

The role the type of vascular access plays in the transmission of hepatitis C virus in a high prevalence hemodialysis unit

BACKGROUND

The necessity of having a vascular access site as well as extracorporeal blood circulation, may add to the risk for patients being dialyzed in units with high HCV prevalence of acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This study endeavors to determine the role the type of vascular access plays in the transmission of HCV infection in the hemodialysis (HD) unit of a Middle Eastern country.

METHODS

The records of 198 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) enrolled on maintenance HD from November 1995 to November 2000 at this tertiary care center, were retrospectively reviewed to match the HCV prevalence and seroconversion rates among patients groups being dialyzed through various types of vascular accesses. Factors such as, number of units of blood transfused and dialytic age (time-span since the initiation of the HD treatment), implicated in transmission of HCV infection in HD units, were also recorded, and compared among these cohorts.

RESULTS

The overall, high HCV seroprevalence of 43.4% (86/198) and annual seroconversion rate of 8.6% per year were recorded. Patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) documented peak anti-HCV prevalence [61.7% (63/102)] and annual seroconversion rates (12.3%) as compared to lowest prevalence of 12.9% (4/34) and seroconversion rate of 2.5%, observed among patients with permanent Catheters (PC). Patients dialyzed through polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts recorded the next highest HCV prevalence of 47.8% (11/23) with seroconversion rate of 9.5% but temporary catheter (TC) group had HCV prevalence of 19% (8/42) and seroconversion rate of 3.8% [Odd Ratio (OR)-1.58, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.37-7.12), p-NS].

CONCLUSIONS

Considerably higher annual seroconversion rates in AVF [OR-10.90, 95% CI (3.2-40.0), p<0.0001] and PTFE [OR-5.71, 95% CI (1.31-26.79), p<0.016)] groups, appear to suggest that the patients being dialyzed through AVF and PTFE, carried significantly higher risk of acquisition of HCV infection compared to those dialyzed through TC and PC (reference group). This could possibly be attributed to likely accessibility of HCV to blood circulation due to possible breakdown of standard infection control precautions during repeated punctures and cannulations of AVF and PTFE to perform a HD, in a unit with high baseline HCV prevalence.

A case of hepatitis C virus transmission acquired through sharing a haemodialysis machine

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant problem among haemodialysis populations worldwide. 'Horizontal' cross-infection between patients can occur, predominately through direct environmental transmission of the virus. Current guidelines thus recommend universal barrier precautions, however they do not suggest using dedicated machines for HCV-positive patients to prevent the 'sequential' transmission of virus to those who subsequently use that machine. We report a case where sequential HCV transmission occurred from a patient of low HCV infectivity with no identifiable machine fault. We suggest that current guidelines should be reviewed to encourage the use of dedicated haemodialysis machines for HCV-positive patients.

Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 8. Gloves as barriers to prevent contamination of food by workers

The role played by food workers and other individuals in the contamination of food has been identified as an important contributing factor leading to foodborne outbreaks. To prevent direct bare hand contact with food and food surfaces, many jurisdictions have made glove use compulsory for food production and preparation. When properly used, gloves can substantially reduce opportunities for food contamination. However, gloves have limitations and may become a source of contamination if they are punctured or improperly used. Experiments conducted in clinical and dental settings have revealed pinhole leaks in gloves. Although such loss of glove integrity can lead to contamination of foods and surfaces, in the food industry improper use of gloves is more likely than leakage to lead to food contamination and outbreaks. Wearing jewelry (e.g., rings) and artificial nails is discouraged because these items can puncture gloves and allow accumulation of microbial populations under them. Occlusion of the skin during long-term glove use in food operations creates the warm, moist conditions necessary for microbial proliferation and can increase pathogen transfer onto foods through leaks or exposed skin or during glove removal. The most important issue is that glove use can create a false sense of security, resulting in more high-risk behaviors that can lead to cross-contamination when employees are not adequately trained.

Mathematical modeling of hepatitis C virus transmission in hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

A deterministic mathematical model is developed to explain nontransfusion nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from patient to patient during hemodialysis sessions.

METHODS

The model requires 4 sequential steps for cross-transmission: (1) The dialysis session contains at least 1 patient infected with HCV; (2) a hemodialysis staff member connects an uninfected patient to dialysis after having connected an infected patient; (3) the hemodialysis staff member does not change gloves between an infected patient and an uninfected patient; and (4) the uninfected patient is contaminated after exposure to the blood of an infected patient.

RESULTS

We tested the model by comparing observed incidences of HCV infection from epidemiologic studies with calculated incidences. Calculated incidences are closed to observed incidences. We assessed the impact of prevalence of HCV infection, no glove change between patients, and nurse:patient ratio on the incidence of HCV infection. We found linear relationships between incidence and prevalence and between incidence and no glove change, and an increasing logarithmic relationship between incidence and nurse:patient ratio.

CONCLUSION

Our model should be able to estimate the likely incidence of infection in hemodialysis centers. Compliance with recommended hand hygiene and glove use practices, especially glove changes between patients, is essential to prevent HCV infection in hemodialysis centers, particularly those with high HCV prevalence. Mathematical modeling can used as a tool for control.

Hepatitis C virus and kidney disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains frequent in patients on renal replacement therapy and has an adverse impact on survival in infected patients on chronic hemodialysis as well as renal transplant (RT) recipients. Nosocomial spread of HCV within dialysis units continues to occur. HCV is also implicated in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction often mediated by cryoglobulins leading to chronic kidney disease as well as impairing renal allograft function. The role of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in patients with renal failure remains unclear. Monotherapy with conventional interferon (IFN) for chronic hepatitis C is probably more effective in dialysis than in non-uraemic patients but tolerance is lower. Limited data only are available about monotherapy with pegylated interferon and combination therapy (pegylated IFN plus ribavirin) for chronic HCV in the dialysis population. Clinical experience with antiviral therapy for acute HCV in dialysis population is encouraging. Interferon remains contraindicated post-RT because of concerns about precipitating graft dysfunction. Sustained viral responses obtained by antiviral therapy in renal transplant candidates are durable after renal transplantation and may reduce HCV-related complications after RT (post-transplant diabetes mellitus, HCV-related glomerulonephritis, and chronic allograft nephropathy).

Clinical and laboratory characteristics of acute hepatitis C in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis are a risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The characteristics of acute hepatitis C infection in this population are not well known.

GOALS

To evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics of acute hepatitis C in ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis.

STUDY

ESRD patients on hemodialysis with acute hepatitis C, characterized by elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) followed by anti-HCV seroconversion were studied.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (58% females, 44+/-12 y), with a mean time on hemodialysis of 2 years, were included. Only 2 (6%) patients had jaundice. ALT elevation was observed in all patients. Median peak ALT was 4.7 x upper limit of normal. The median interval between ALT elevation and anti-HCV seroconversion was 1 month (0 to 8). None of the patients with detectable HCV-RNA showed spontaneous clearance of viremia within 12 weeks of follow-up. Three (8%) patients presented ALT elevation followed by anti-HCV seroconversion with undetectable HCV-RNA.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute hepatitis C is frequently asymptomatic in ESRD patients on hemodialysis and should be suspected in all patients presenting elevated ALT. Determination of HCV-RNA is important for the confirmation of infection. Anti-HCV seroconversion seems to occur early and spontaneous clearance of HCV-RNA is uncommon.

Hepatitis C virus infection and the dialysis patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains common in patients undergoing regular dialysis and is an important cause of liver disease in this population both during dialysis and after renal transplantation (RT). Anti-HCV screening of blood products has almost eliminated posttransfusion HCV infection but acquisition of HCV continues to occur in dialysis patients because of nosocomial spread. The natural history of HCV in dialysis population is not completely understood though recent data show that HCV infection has a detrimental role on survival of chronic dialysis patients. Several clinical trials have suggested that the response rate to conventional interferon (IFN) is higher in dialysis patients than those with normal kidney function but tolerance is lower. There are only limited data about pegylated IFN alone or in association with ribavirin for hepatitis C in dialysis population. IFN remains contraindicated post-RT because of concern about precipitating graft dysfunction; however, preliminary evidence shows the durability of sustained response to antiviral therapy pre-RT after renal transplant. Successful pretransplant therapy is associated with several benefits after RT including reduced incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and de novo glomerulonephritis in HCV-infected recipients.

Iatrogenic transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) by an anesthesiologist: comparative molecular analysis of the HCV-E1 and HCV-E2 hypervariable regions

BACKGROUND

Transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from infected health care workers to patients rarely occurs. In 2003, a cluster of patients with HCV infection was identified at a medical center in Israel. All patients had a common history of various surgical procedures performed during the period 2001-2003. All patients had been anesthetized by an anesthesiologist who was an injection drug user and was infected with genotype 2a HCV. Screening was initiated by the hospital to identify newly infected patients with HCV infection and to determine the source of the iatrogenic HCV infection outbreak using comparative molecular analysis of the HCV E1 and HCV E2 hypervariable regions (HVR1 and HVR2).

METHODS

A total of 1200 patients who were anesthetized by the anesthesiologist (the related group) and 873 hospital personnel and patients anesthetized by other anesthetists (the unrelated group) were examined. Serum samples were screened for anti-HCV antibodies, HCV RNA, and genotype. Sequence analysis of HVR1 and HVR2 was performed after reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

HCV type 2a was found in 33 patients in the related group but in only 1 patient in the unrelated group. The differences between the sequences isolated from the related group serum samples and the sequences isolated from genotype 2a control group serum samples (obtained from 15 patients) were highly statistically significant. The genetic distances from the anesthesiologist sequence were 1.4%-4.4% in the HVR1 and 0%-3% in the HVR2 in the related group serum samples, whereas in the HCV genotype 2a control group serum samples, the genetic distances were 22%-45% and 10%-35%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular analysis revealed sequence similarity of HVR1 and HVR2 in the related group, suggesting that the anesthesiologist with chronic HCV infection may have transmitted HCV to 33 patients.

Pegylated-interferon alpha 2a treatment for chronic hepatitis C in patients on chronic haemodialysis

AIM: To evaluate the response to pegylated-interferon alpha 2a in chronic hepatitis C patients on chronic haemodialysis.

METHODS: Ten patients with chronic C hepatitis were enrolled in this study. All had increased aminotransferases for more than 6 mo, positive antiHCV antibodies and positive PCR HCV-RNA. We administrated Peg-Interferon alpha 2a 180 μg/wk for 48 wk. After 12 wk of treatment we evaluated the biochemical and early virological response (EVR). At the end of the treatment we evaluated the biochemical response and 24 wk after the end of the treatment we evaluated the sustained virological response (SVR). We monitored the side-effects during the treatment.

RESULTS: Two patients dropped out in the first 12 wk of treatment and 2 after the first 12 wk of treatment. After 12 wk of treatment, 7 out of 8 patients had biochemical response and EVR and 1 had biochemical response but persistent viremia. We had to reduce the dose of pegylated-interferon to 135 μg/wk in 2 cases. Three out of 6 (50%) patients had SVR 24 wk after the end of the treatment. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 3 out of 10 patients (30%) had SVR. Side-effects occurred in most of the patients (flu-like syndrome, thrombocytopenia or leucopoenia), but they did not impose the discontinuation of treatment.

CONCLUSION: After 12 wk of treatment with Peg-Interferon alpha 2a (40 ku) in patients on chronic haemodialysis with chronic C hepatitis, EVR was obtained in 87.5% (7/8) of the cases. SVR was achieved in 50% of the cases (3/6 patients) that finished the 48 wk of treatment.

Effect of isolation measures on the incidence and prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemodialysis (HD) units is well established. In units with a high prevalence of HCV infection, the implementation of universal precautionary measures may not suffice in order to decrease the incidence and prevalence of HCV. In this setting strict isolation practices can be useful in order to achieve this goal.

METHODS

The incidence and prevalence of HCV infection amongst all HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients from the province of Albacete, Spain, have been studied from 1992 to 2003.Through the 1993-1995 period chronic HD patients were treated either in a room exclusively for HCV- patients or in a room shared by HCV+ and HCV- patients. Complete separation of HCV+ and HCV- patients was implemented in 1995. Acute patients have been separated since 1992. The implementation of universal precautions was applied throughout the period.

RESULTS

There has not been a single seroconversion in the rooms where only HCV- patients were dialyzed during the 11 years of follow-up. There were two seroconversions in the rooms shared for 3 years by both HCV+ and HCV- patients. In 1995 the prevalence of HCV+ cases in HD and PD was 21.6 and 23.2%, respectively. Since then it has decreased steadily and in parallel for both therapies, and the current prevalence is 6.8% in HD and 5.7% in PD.

CONCLUSIONS

In HD units with a high prevalence of HCV+ patients, strict isolation in combination with implementation of universal prevention measures can eliminate nosocomial transmission and obtain a long-term reduction in prevalence.

Evaluation of a total core antigen assay for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients

Hemodialysis patients are recognized as a group at high risk of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Therefore, such a population should be screened routinely for the presence of HCV viremia. Since nucleic acid techniques remain expensive and largely unavailable in many laboratories in the developing world, the present study assesses the clinical usefulness of the HCV core antigen enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of HCV infection in dialysis patients. One hundred seventy-five dialysis patients were screened for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA in the serum. One hundred twenty-eight serum samples were collected from the 76 patients who were anti-HCV antibody- and/or HCV RNA-positive. These were evaluated for total HCV core antigen. Of these samples, 55 had sufficient volume to be further tested to quantify HCV RNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Genotyping of the HCV strains showed that the majority belonged to genotype 1b (77%). The HCV core antigen assay showed a sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 89%, respectively. The use of core antigen assay has enabled the early detection of three patients who developed an acute hepatitis C infection during the period of study. A correlation study was undertaken between the quantitative values of viral load, expressed as pg/ml of HCV core antigen in serum, and viral RNA in UI/ml. A significant correlation was observed (Pearson's correlation coefficient: 0.552; P<0.001). In conclusion, detection of HCV core antigen in serum is an inexpensive, reliable, and highly specific assay that can be useful in most laboratory settings to diagnose HCV infection, and especially in laboratories where nucleic acid technologies are not yet available.

Nosocomial transmission of HCV in the liver unit of a tertiary care center

Despite its medical and legal implications, there are no prospective studies analyzing the incidence and mechanisms involved in the nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in liver units. This study prospectively investigates the nosocomial transmission of HCV in the liver unit of a tertiary care center from August 2000 to October 2002. The median prevalence of HCV infection among hospitalized patients was 50%. Anti-HCV-negative patients admitted to the liver unit during the study period were prospectively followed, and serum markers of HCV infection were repeated 6 months after discharge. All known risk factors for HCV transmission (including the physical allocation of HCV-infected and noninfected patients during hospitalization) were recorded. Complete follow-up data were available in 1301 (84.5%) of 1540 patients. Six patients (0.46%) acquired HCV infection (annual incidence: 0.27/100 admissions). Phylogenetic analyses of recovered HCV sequences identified the source of infection as an HCV-infected roommate (3 cases) and a patient receiving care by the same nurse team (1 case). The most relevant risk factors associated with HCV acquisition were duration of hospitalization (>10 days; OR, 35; 95% CI, 1.96-622) and hospitalization with an HCV-infected roommate (>5 days; OR, 12; 95% CI, 1.39-103). In fact, HCV infection occurred in 1.7% of the 357 patients hospitalized longer than 10 days. In conclusion, HCV nosocomial infection appears to occur via patient-to-patient transmission in liver units, particularly in individuals who require long hospitalizations. Continuous reinforcement of universal prevention measures and, when possible, isolation of patients at higher risk might further reduce nosocomial HCV transmission.

Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among hemodialysis patients at a tertiary-care hospital in Mexico City, Mexico

We determined the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemodialysis patients by antibody testing and HCV RNA determination by PCR. A total of 149 patients with kidney failure with replacement therapy were tested. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 6.7% (10 of 149 patients), and viremia was detectable in 8 of 149 (5%) patients. Three of 149 patients (2%) were anti-HCV negative with detectable HCV RNA.

The role of hemodialysis machines dedication in reducing Hepatitis C transmission in the dialysis setting in Iran: a multicenter prospective interventional study

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant problem among patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD). We conducted a prospective multi-center study to evaluate the effect of dialysis machine separation on the spread of HCV infection.

METHODS

Twelve randomly selected dialysis centers in Tehran, Iran were randomly divided into two groups; those using dedicated machines (D) for HCV infected individuals and those using non-dedicated HD machines (ND). 593 HD cases including 51 HCV positive (RT-PCR) cases and 542 HCV negative patients were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of HCV infection in the D group was 10.1% (range: 4.6%- 13.2%) and it was 7.1% (range: 4.2%-16.8%) in the ND group. During the study conduction 5 new HCV positive cases and 169 new HCV negative cases were added. In the D group, PCR positive patients were dialyzed on dedicated machines. In the ND group all patients shared the same machines.

RESULTS

In the first follow-up period, the incidence of HCV infection was 1.6% and 4.7% in the D and ND group respectively (p = 0.05). In the second follow-up period, the incidence of HCV infection was 1.3% in the D group and 5.7% in the ND group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study the incidence of HCV in HD patients decreased by the use of dedicated HD machines for HCV infected patients. Additional studies may help to clarify the role of machine dedication in conjunction with application of universal precautions in reducing HCV transmission.

Natural history of chronic hepatitis C in patients on hemodialysis: Case control study with 4-23 years of follow-up

AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is very common among end-stage kidney disease patients on hemodialysis, but its natural history is not known.

METHODS: In this study, 189 dialysis patients (case) positive for HCV antibodies who were followed up for more than 4 years were compared with twice as many sex/age matched controls with chronic hepatitis C who were diagnosed in the same month as the case and followed up for comparable periods. The longest follow-up was 23 years in dialysis cases. The disease activities were graded into “asymptomatic” if ALT was less than 40 (35 in cases) IU/L, “low activities” if ALT was 40 (35)-79 IU/L, and “high activities” if ALT was above 80 IU/L during the last or latest 4 year period.

RESULTS: All 25 dialysis cases who were followed up for more than 15 years were asymptomatic and 15 of them were negative for HCV RNA. Of the 50 controls followed up for more than 15 years, 34 had high activities, and none cleared HCV RNA. There were 60 controls who were asymptomatic, but they were all positive for HCV RNA, while 22.3% of asymptomatic dialysis cases were RNA negative. No dialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C progressed to cirrhosis, whereas the disease progressed to cirrhosis in more than one quarter of the controls. These differences were highly significant (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION: Chronic hepatitic C among hemodialysis patients is mild in disease activity, and is not progressive, perhaps due to immunological abnormalities in these patients. Hepatic C virus is frequently cleared in asymptomatic dialysis patients during a long course. A possible mechanism for viral clearance is viral particle destruction on the surface of the dialyzer membrane.

The impact of nurse understaffing on the transmission of hepatitis C virus in a hospital-based hemodialysis unit

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of nurse understaffing on the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a large hospital-based hemodialysis (HD) unit with a high HCV prevalence.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The records of 198 patients (107 males and 91 females) with end-stage renal disease enrolled on long-term HD at King Fahad Hospital and Tertiary Care Center, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia, from August 1995 to August 2000, were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were assigned to HD groups of varying patient-to-nurse (P/N) ratios: group I, 2:1; group II, 3:1, and group III, 4:1. HCV prevalence, seroconversion rates, history of blood transfusion and dialysis age (time span since the initiation of the HD treatment) were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The overall HCV prevalence and seroconversion rate per year were 43.4 and 8.6%, respectively. Group I had the lowest HCV prevalence and annual seroconversion rate (26.8%; 5.3%), followed by group II (43.6%; 8.7%); group III had the highest HCV prevalence and seroconversion rate (71.8%; 14.4%). Anti-HCV positivity was associated with a higher dialysis age.

CONCLUSION

The finding that the patients in the groups with the relatively higher P/N ratio had the significantly higher HCV prevalence and seroconversion rates per year indicates that understaffing is likely to play a major role in the transmission of HCV in HD units, and we suggest that improved staffing may be helpful in reducing the HCV transmission in such dialysis units.

The vulnerability of middle-aged and elderly patients to hepatitis C virus infection in a high-prevalence hospital-based hemodialysis setting

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between advancing age and the risk of acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, through evaluation and statistical comparison of seroprevalence and seroconversion rates in different age groups of patients on long-term hemodialysis (HD).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hemodialysis facility of King Fahad Hospital and Tertiary Care Center, Al-Hasa region of the eastern province of Saudi Arabia.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred ninety-eight patients with end-stage renal disease enrolled for long-term HD therapy from September 1995 to September 2000.

MEASUREMENTS

HCV seroprevalence and seroconversion rates.

RESULTS

The overall HCV seroprevalence of 43.4% (86/198) and seroconversion rate of 8.6% per year were recorded. Patients aged 55 to 64 had the highest anti-HCV prevalence (55.3% (26/47)) and annual seroconversion rates (11.0%). Those aged 65 to 74 had the next-highest prevalence (48.9% (24/49)) and seroconversion rate (9.7%), and patients aged 15 to 24 had the lowest prevalence (12.5% (1/8)) and seroconversion rate (2.5%) (reference group).

CONCLUSION

Significantly higher annual seroconversion rates in those aged 55 to 64 and 65 to 74 during a shorter dialysis period (35.6 and 32.7 vs 58.0 months), suggest the greater susceptibility of the middle-aged and elderly patients to acquisition of HCV infection than the younger (15-24 years) group. This could be attributed to the combined effect of immunosuppression associated with advancing age, uremia, and undernutrition, but multicenter molecular follow-up studies with larger sample sizes would be needed to corroborate these findings and plan appropriate strategies for these high-risk groups.

Contamination by hepatitis B and C viruses in the dialysis setting

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis virus infections continue to be a major concern in the dialysis setting. We studied levels of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA contamination in dialysis units to better define the role of the dialysis environment and machines in the nosocomial transmission of hepatitis viruses.

METHODS

Possible contamination by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV was studied by collecting environmental samples in 3 dialysis units located in Rome, Italy. Samples and controls were tested for HBsAg by a microparticle enzyme immunoassay, and for HCV RNA, by qualitative transcription-mediated amplification assay.

RESULTS

HCV RNA and HBsAg were detected in 1 of 64 (1.6%) and 1 of 64 samples (1.6%), respectively. The only HCV RNA-positive sample was found in 1 dialysis unit on the external surface of the dialysate (inlet-outlet) connector of a dialysis machine used for HCV-negative patients. The only HBsAg-positive sample was found in another dialysis unit on the internal surface of the blood pressure monitor cuff of a dialysis bed dedicated for HBsAg-positive patients.

CONCLUSION

A segregation policy for HBsAg-positive patients is a necessary measure despite its high cost-effectiveness; we found HBsAg contamination in the segregated HBV-infected room. Conversely, the finding of HCV RNA contamination on a dialysis machine not dedicated to HCV-positive patients suggests that isolation of HCV-infected dialysis patients and use of dedicated machines are unjustified. Major attention should be given to strict adherence to infection control measures in the dialysis setting.

Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and is an important cause of liver disease in this population. Acquisition of HCV infection continues to occur in dialysis patients because of nosocomial spread. The natural history of HCV in dialysis patients remains controversial because the course of HCV typically extends over decades, whereas dialysis patients have higher morbidity and mortality rates than those of the general population limiting long-term follow-up. However, recent reports suggest that HCV infection affects the survival of chronic dialysis patients as well as renal transplant (RT) recipients. The severity of preexisting liver disease on pretransplantation liver biopsy may provide useful prognostic information about clinical outcome after RT; liver biopsy should be incorporated in the evaluation and management of RT candidates with HCV. Recent surveys with long-term follow-up have documented adverse effects of HCV on patient and graft survival. Use of renal grafts from HCV-infected donors in recipients with HCV does not appear to result in a greater burden of liver disease albeit with short-term follow-up. There is only limited data about interferon (IFN) therapy in chronic dialysis patients, although sustained responses are reported. Preliminary data on IFN plus ribavirin therapy in dialysis patients with hepatitis C have given encouraging results, but randomized trials are needed. Interferon remains contraindicated post-RT because of concern about precipitating graft dysfunction.

Outbreak of hepatitis C virus infection in a hemodialysis unit: potential transmission by the hemodialysis machine?

OBJECTIVE

To identify the routes of transmission during an outbreak of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2a/2c in a hemodialysis unit.

DESIGN

A matched case-control study was conducted to identify risk factors for HCV seroconversion. Direct observation and staff interviews were conducted to assess infection control practices. Molecular methods were used in a comparison of HCV infecting isolates from the case-patients and from patients infected with the 2a/2c genotype before admission to the unit.

SETTING

A hemodialysis unit treating an average of 90 patients.

PATIENTS

A case-patient was defined as a patient receiving hemodialysis with a seroconversion for HCV genotype 2a/2c between January 1994 and July 1997 who had received dialysis in the unit during the 3 months before the onset of disease. For each case-patient, 3 control-patients were randomly selected among all susceptible patients treated in the unit during the presumed contamination period of the case-patient.

RESULTS

HCV seroconversion was associated with the number of hemodialysis sessions undergone on a machine shared with (odds ratio [OR] per additional session, 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 0.9 to 1.8) or in the same room as (OR per additional session, 1.1; CI95, 1.0 to 1.2) a patient who was anti-HCV (genotype 2a/2c) positive. We observed several breaches in infection control procedures. Wetting of transducer protectors in the external pressure tubing sets with patient blood reflux was observed, leading to a potential contamination by blood of the pressure-sensing port of the machine, which is not accessible to routine disinfection. The molecular analysis of HCV infecting isolates identified among the case-patients revealed two groups of identical isolates similar to those of two patients infected before admission to the unit.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest patient-to-patient transmission of HCV by breaches in infection control practices and possible contamination of the machine. No additional cases have occurred since the reinforcement of infection control procedures and the use of a second transducer protector.

Protein restriction ameliorates renal tubulointerstitial nephritis and reduces renal transforming growth factor-beta expression in unilateral ureteral obstruction

In contrast to the substantial evidence for attenuation of the glomerular lesions by a low-protein (LP) diet, it remains to be determined whether and how such a diet lessens the progression of tubulointerstitial lesions, which show the strongest correlation with renal function. Chronic unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) results in interstitial fibrosis of the affected kidney. We investigated the therapeutic effects of an LP diet on the progression of interstitial fibrosis in UUO mice. Sixty ICR mice underwent UUO or sham operation; half of these mice were fed a normal-protein (NP) and the other half a LP diet. They were sacrificed at 3, 7 and 14 days postoperatively. The degree of tubular lesion, the distribution of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), alpha-smooth muscle actin and fibronectin and the activated TGF-beta 1 level were determined. The LP diet significantly reduced the progression of tubular injury, depositions of fibronectin, tubulointerstitial myofibroblast formation, the interstitial expression of TGF-beta-positive cells (at 14 days; NP = 6.91 +/- 3.35 vs. LP = 1.67 +/- 0.41; p < 0.005), and renal active TGF-beta 1 concentration (at 14 days; NP = 5.72 +/- 2.03 vs. LP = 2.96 +/- 0.72; p < 0.01). We conclude that protein restriction may aid the attenuation of progression of tubulointerstitial fibrosis through the reduction in tubulointerstitial expression of TGF-beta.

Hepatitis C: an epidemiological review

The aim of the study was to analyse the current literature regarding the mode of transmission of HCV and its global prevalence in different groups of people. A systematic review of the literature on the epidemiology of hepatitis C from 1991 to 2000 using computerized bibliographic databases which include Medline, Current Content and Embase. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) varies tremendously in different parts of the world, with the highest incidence in the Eastern parts of the globe compared with the Western parts. Furthermore, certain groups of individuals such as intravenous drug users are at increased risk of acquiring this disease irrespective of the geographical location. Although the main route of transmission is via contaminated blood, curiously enough in up to 50% of the cases no recognizable transmission factor/route could be identified. Therefore, a number of other routes of transmission such as sexual or household exposure to infected contacts have been investigated with conflicting results. Hepatitis C infection is an important public health issue globally. Better understanding of routes of transmission will help to combat the spread of disease. In order to prevent a world wide epidemic of this disease, urgent measures are required to (i) develop a strategy to inform and educate the public regarding this disease and (ii) expedite the efforts to develop a vaccine.

Hepatitis C in a ward for cystic fibrosis and diabetic patients: possible transmission by spring-loaded finger-stick devices for self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose

OBJECTIVE

To identify the routes of transmission in a nosocomial outbreak of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

DESIGN

Epidemiological investigation, including screening for HCV of hospitalized patients, and a retrospective cohort study, review of hygiene and medical practices, and molecular comparison of HCV isolates.

SETTING

A specialized care unit for cystic fibrosis (CF) and diabetic patients at an acute-care facility in the south of France.

RESULTS

Of the 57 CF patients (age in 1995: 2-28 years), 38 (66.7%) were tested and 22 (57.9%) were anti-HCV positive. Eight (50%) of 16 patients with anti-HCV antibody tested by polymerase chain reaction were viremic. No patients had received blood products or had any history of intravenous drug use. All 18 (100%) patients with CF who had ever undergone self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose in the unit were anti-HCV positive, compared to 4 (20%) of 20 who had not (relative risk, 5.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-12.0). Seventy (39.5%) of the patients with diabetes were screened for anti-HCV; 12 (18.8%) tested positive, with 3 (25%) positive for HCV-RNA. Patients with diabetes had routine capillary blood glucose monitoring while hospitalized and shared with CF patients the same spring-triggered devices for capillary blood glucose monitoring. The disposable platform of the devices was not changed between patient use. All HCV isolates belonged to the type 1, subtype b, and phylogenetic analysis showed a close homology by sequencing of NS5b and E2/HVR regions.

CONCLUSION

As reported earlier for the hepatitis B virus, shared spring-triggered devices for capillary blood glucose monitoring by finger puncture may transmit HCV. Strict application of Standard Precautions procedures is warranted in any healthcare setting.

Prevalence of infected patients and understaffing have a role in hepatitis C virus transmission in dialysis

To assess hepatitis C virus (HCV) incidence rates and identify determinants of infection among hemodialysis patients, a multicenter study was conducted in 58 units in ITALY: An initial seroprevalence survey was conducted among 3,492 patients already on hemodialysis therapy as of January 1997 and among an additional 434 patients who began dialysis up to January 1998. HCV antibodies were assessed by third-generation enzyme immunoassays. Patients testing seronegative at baseline were enrolled into a 1-year incidence study with serological follow-up at 6 and 12 months. For patients who seroconverted, an HCV RNA assay was performed on stored baseline samples to confirm new infection. A nested case-control study was subsequently performed to investigate potential risk factors. For each incident case, three controls negative for both HCV antibodies and HCV RNA were randomly selected. At enrollment, HCV seroprevalence was 30.0%. During follow-up, 23 new HCV cases were documented, with a cumulative incidence of 9.5 cases/1,000 patient-years. By logistic regression analysis, an increased risk for HCV infection emerged for patients attending the dialysis units with a high prevalence of HCV-infected patients at baseline (odds ratio [OR], 4.6) and for those attending units with a low personnel-patient ratio (OR, 5.4). Among extradialysis factors, a history of surgical intervention in the previous 6 months (OR, 16.7) significantly increased HCV risk. These findings suggest that the combination of understaffing and a high level of infected patients in the dialysis setting increases the risk for HCV nosocomial transmission. This is likely related to an increased likelihood for breaks in infection control measures.

Hepatitis C virus transmission in a pediatric oncology ward: analysis of an outbreak and review of the literature

Hospital-related hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections continue to occur even after the introduction of blood donor screening. We report an outbreak of HCV in nine patients of a pediatric oncology ward in 1996/1997. Sequencing of the hypervariable genomic region 1 (HVR1) of the E2/NS1 region showed near identity between HCV isolates from these patients as evidence for infection with the same virus. Despite a detailed and careful investigation, the source of infection and the mode of virus transmission could not be established. Based on a review of the current literature about nosocomial HCV infection and HCV infection in children, hypotheses for possible means of transmission in this outbreak are discussed.

Phylogenetic investigation for the risk of hepatitis C virus transmission to surgical and dental patients

Blood loss during treatment carries a potential risk for the transmission of blood-borne pathogens in hospital patients. To determine whether nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) occurs in surgical wards and dental hospitals, we tested anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA in sera from these patients and analysed the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) sequence of HCV phylogenetically in the HCV RNA-positive patients. Five of 83 patients from a surgical ward were positive for HCV RNA, and six patients from one dental hospital and nine patients from a second were found to be positive for HCV RNA during the examination period. The HVR1 sequences were amplified from these patients' serum, and after subcloning, multiple clones of the HVR1 sequence from each patient were determined. The phylogenetic analysis of these sequences showed that HVR1 species from each patient could be classified into one to three genetic clusters of HVR1 quasi-species and that these clusters were independent of each other among patients. Thus, there was no evidence of HCV transmission in our study, and unrecognized transmission of HCV may be a rare event in surgical and dental patients at university hospitals.

Phylogenetic evidence, by multiple clone analysis of hypervariable region 1, for the transmission of hepatitis C virus to chronic haemodialysis patients

We analysed hepatitis C virus (HCV) sequences to determine whether nosocomial transmission of HCV occurred in a haemodialysis unit. Twenty patients positive for serum HCV RNA were investigated. All were undergoing haemodialysis therapy in the same room. The hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) sequence of HCV was amplified and multiple clones sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences revealed five genetic clusters consisting of HCV isolates from 11 of the 20 patients. In addition to two genetic clusters of HCV isolates from the four currently seroconverting patients and another patient who had been persistently infected, we identified three other phylogenetic relationships in HCV isolates from six patients. The patients grouped into the same cluster received haemodialysis individually on the same shift and/or side-by-side. Phylogenetic analysis of HCV HVR1 sequences corroborated the patient-to-patient HCV transmission suggested by an epidemiological study and that unrecognized transmission of HCV occurs in the dialysis room. Our multiple clone analysis of HCV isolates provides detailed information on nosocomial transmission of HCV. Transmission occurs more frequently when treatment is performed at the same time than in consoles located close to each other.

Occasional infection of hepatitis C virus occurring in haemodialysis units identified by serial monitoring of the virus infection

To examine whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection still occurs in haemodialysis units even after a decrease in the number of blood transfusions and in those contaminated with HCV, we tested anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA in 142 patients from Japanese haemodialysis units, and examined the serial prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies in 86 patients from 1992 to 1997. A high prevalence of HCV infection was observed: 34 (23.9%) and 38 (26.8%) of the 142 patients were positive for serum anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA, respectively. These positive rates were related to the duration of haemodialysis. We found that five patients treated in the same unit seroconverted from 1993 to 1995. Four of the five patients had been treated at the same shift and were affected at the same time. Phylogenetic analysis of the hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) sequence of HCV from serum of these patients showed that three of the four patients' sequences were phylogenetically clustered and that two of the three were closely related. Thus, an occasional transmission of HCV occurred in the haemodialysis unit. The universal precautions by staff such as carefully changing gloves may be important in inhibiting spread of HCV because no instances of infection have been seen since the instigation of educational measures for unit staff.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus in Asia: past and present perspectives

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major public health problem. The epidemiology of HCV infection in different parts of Asia is similar, with an average seroprevalence of hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) less than 2.5% in healthy adults. The infection is rarely seen in children. The major routes of HCV transmission in Asia during the past few decades have been through administration of therapeutic blood products and injecting drug use, similar to the pattern observed in other parts of the world. However, obvious parenteral routes of transmission only account for 30-60% of anti-HCV-positive cases, depending on the geographic area. Other inapparent parenteral or per-mucosal exposures, including medical intervention, tattooing, acupuncture, vertical and sexual transmission, accidental needlestick and household contact, are also possible routes of HCV transmission. Although screening of blood donors for anti-HCV and improvements in infection control have significantly decreased the exposure to HCV, it is believed that HCV is still spreading in some areas of Asia because of the lack of routine screening of donated blood, injecting drug usage, traditional medicine practices or medical treatment under suboptimal hygienic conditions that involve blood contamination, and tattooing. Accordingly, until effective and safe immunoprophylaxis is available, interruption of transmission routes, such as implementation of blood donor screening for anti-HCV, adequate sterilization of surgical instruments or the use of disposable medical instruments, especially needles and syringes, and avoidance of sharing personal grooming aids remains the mainstay to prevent HCV infection in Asia today.

Primer on hepatitis C for hospital epidemiologists

First identified in the late 1980s as the main causative agent of non-A, non-B hepatitis, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now the most common chronic bloodborne infection in the United States. It is likely that the number of deaths attributable to HCV-related chronic liver disease will increase substantially during the next 2 decades, and the potential economic and clinical burden related to HCV is staggering. Accordingly, it is essential to identify risk factors for transmission of HCV and implement appropriate precautions to decrease the prevalence of this emerging infection. The relative importance of the two most common types of exposures associated with transmission of HCV, ie, blood transfusion and injection drug use, has evolved over time. Strict blood-donor selection and the use of reliable serological tests have led to a significant reduction in transfusion-associated risk. Injection drug use is currently the single most important risk factor for HCV infection in the United States. Transmission of HCV poses a serious threat to healthcare workers and patients if infection control techniques or disinfection procedures are inadequate. Potential exposures include contact of the eyes, mucous membranes, broken skin, or needlestick injury. Hospitalized patients may serve as a reservoir for transmission, and the prevalence of anti-HCV seropositivity among such patients can be as high as 20%. The infected healthcare worker is a potential source of transmission. A recent molecular phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that a cardiac surgeon likely transmitted HCV to five of his patients during open heart surgery. In summary, nosocomial transmission has been unequivocally confirmed and underscores the need for strict infection control practices.

Hepatitis C and renal failure

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among patients with chronic renal failure. This chronic viral infection can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Liver failure from chronic hepatitis C is one of the leading causes of death among long-term survivors of renal transplantation. HCV infection also can be a cause of glomerulonephritis and nephrotic syndrome. Recognition of these conditions is important to optimize the management of these patients.

Detection of de novo hepatitis C virus infection by polymerase chain reaction in hemodialysis patients

Patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) treatment have been identified by serological testing, including second- and third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), as a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Previous studies have shown that de novo cases of HCV may occur in HD units in the absence of other parenteral exposures, which suggests the spread of HCV between patients. In addition, the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), which directly detects HCV virus, has identified HCV infection in chronic HD patients who are seronegative. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of HCV infection detected by RT-PCR technology in a large cohort of chronic HD patients. One hundred and twenty chronic HD patients, HCV-negative by serological assays (second-generation ELISA) and molecular techniques (branched DNA and RT-PCR), were observed for a mean period of 9.5 months. They were tested monthly for serum alanine aminotransferase levels (ALT) and by second-generation ELISA. At the end of the follow-up period, they were again evaluated by branched DNA and RT-PCR testing. HCV RNA was detected in patients' sera by RT followed by PCR using two separate primer sets from the 5'-untranslated region of the HCV genome. Southern blot was performed using a digoxigenin-labeled probe. Two patients who had HCV RNA detectable by RT-PCR at the end of the follow-up period remained branched-DNA-negative. Thus, the incidence of de novo acquisition of HCV infection in the current investigation was 2.1% per year. In 1 patient RT-PCR positivity and anti-HCV ELISA seroconversion occurred. The 2nd patient remained anti-HCV ELISA-negative, although viremic. In both patients, the onset of positivity by RT-PCR was associated with a rise of ALT levels into the 'abnormal range' in our laboratory. In these 2 patients, de novo acquisition of HCV infection was observed in the absence of obvious parenteral risk factors other than their presence in the HD environment. In conclusion, de novo acquisition of HCV infection may be undetected by ELISA and branched-DNA assays. The need to monitor chronic HD patients by serial ALT testing is emphasized. RT-PCR should be incorporated into diagnostic testing for HCV infection in chronic HD patients. RT-PCR technology can identify HCV in HD individuals with raised ALT activity.

Molecular evidence for nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus in a French hemodialysis unit

A systematic virological follow-up of hemodialysis patients identified 11 cases of de novo hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the same unit that were not due to blood transfusion. There were three groups of infection, each occurring within a period of 3 months: four infections with genotype 1b, two infections with genotype 1b, and five infections, four with genotype 1a and one with genotype 5a. The possibility of patient-to-patient transmission was addressed by sequencing the first hypervariable region of the HCV genome in sera taken shortly after infection. Phylogenetic analysis indicated clustering of most of the cases of de novo infections. Sequence homologies identified potential contaminators among already infected patients. All patients who were infected with closely related HCV isolates were found to have been treated in the same area and during the same shift or on the previous one. These infections could have been due to occasional breaches of the usual hygiene measures. Strict adhesion to hygiene standards and routines, continuously supervised, remains the key rule in the management of dialysis patients. Nevertheless, the isolation of patients with HCV could reduce the risk of infection because occasional lapses of preventive hygiene measures or unpredictable accidents can always take place in a hemodialysis unit. This policy needs to be evaluated by large-scale prospective studies.

Genetic and serological evidence for multiple instances of unrecognized transmission of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis units

We investigated the unrecognized patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemodialysis units by performing phylogenetic and serological analyses of hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) of HCV. Of the 62 patients in one center, 11 were positive for HCV RNA. A total of 24 HVR1 sequences, including the minor population of sequences of HCV isolates, from each patient were closely related and classified into five clusters by phylogenetic analysis. Of the 11 patients, 5 were infected with multiple clusters of HCV. Two patients were infected with HCV during an 18-month interval between examinations, and these HVR1 sequences fell into one of the five clusters. In another hemodialysis center, 5 of the 20 patients were HCV RNA positive, and two HVR1 sequences were found to be closely related and phylogenetically derived from the same cluster. The antibody responses of these patients to the HVR1 peptides representative of the genetic clusters revealed exactly the same clustering as that shown by phylogenetic analysis. These findings suggest that phylogenetic and serological analyses of HVR1 sensitively detect unrecognized and multiple transmission of HCV occurring within the same room in hemodialysis centers. Fingerprinting analyses using hypervariable regions of infectious agents are useful in identifying the precise route of transmission of infection.

Acute hepatitis C among renal failure patients on chronic haemodialysis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in haemodialysis units, yet little information is available about the clinical feature of acute hepatitis C among renal failure patients. The present study is based on 49 cases of acute hepatitis C seen at a haemodialysis centre where sporadic nosocomial infection was occurring up to June 1993. Liver function tests were done at 4 weekly intervals on all dialysis patients, anti-HCV antibodies were tested by the C-100 and second generation tests and serum HCV-RNA was determined by the branched DNA and Amplicore tests. Diagnosis of acute hepatitis C was made on the basis of an acute rise in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and seroconversion to positive anti-HCV antibodies. Clinical presentation of acute hepatitis was generally mild with rare overt jaundice and the diagnosis was possible only from increased ALT, which was generally low. Spontaneous resolution of acute hepatitis within 8 months with clearance of viral RNA occurred in only four cases, 91.8% of patients developing chronic hepatitis. Biopsy in 12 cases with high ALT levels showed mild to moderate inflammatory activities. In conclusion, the clinical presentation of acute hepatitis C is generally mild in chronic haemodialysis patients, but spontaneous resolution is infrequent. A longer follow-up period is required for defining the long-term prognosis.