Endpoints for multimodal clinical trials in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a consensus report

Phase I trial of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib in combination with thoracic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signalling pathway has a pivotal role in cancer proliferation and modulating treatment response. Selumetinib inhibits MEK and enhances effects of radiotherapy in preclinical studies.

Patients and methods

Single-arm, single-centre, open-label phase I trial. Patients with stage III NSCLC unsuitable for concurrent chemo-radiotherapy, or stage IV with dominant thoracic symptoms, were recruited to a dose-finding stage (Fibonacci 3 + 3 design; maximum number = 18) then an expanded cohort (n = 15). Oral selumetinib was administered twice daily (starting dose 50 mg) commencing 7 days prior to thoracic radiotherapy, then with radiotherapy (6-6.5 weeks; 60-66 Gy/30-33 fractions). The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of selumetinib in combination with thoracic radiotherapy.

Results

21 patients were enrolled (06/2010-02/2015). Median age: 62y (range 50-73). M:F ratio 12(57%):9(43%). ECOG PS 0:1, 7(33%):14(67%). Stage III 16(76%); IV 5(24%). Median GTV 64 cm³ (range 1-224 cm³). 15 patients comprised the expanded cohort at starting dose. All 21 patients completed thoracic radiotherapy as planned and received induction chemotherapy. 13 (62%) patients received the full dose of selumetinib.In the starting cohort no enhanced radiotherapy-related toxicity was seen. Two patients had dose-limiting toxicity (1x grade 3 diarrhoea/fatigue and 1x pulmonary embolism). Commonest grade 3-4 adverse events: lymphopaenia (19/21 patients) and hypertension (7/21 patients). One patient developed grade 3 oesophagitis. No patients developed grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis. Two patients were alive at the time of analysis (24 and 26 months follow-up, respectively). Main cause of first disease progression: distant metastases ± locoregional progression (12/21 [57.1%] patients). Six patients had confirmed/suspected pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia.

Conclusion

We report poor outcome and severe lymphopenia in most patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy and selumetinib at RP2D in combination, contributing to confirmed/clinically suspected pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. These results suggest that this combination should not be pursued in a phase II trial.ClinicalTrials.gov reference: NCT01146756.

Differential Relapse Patterns for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Subtypes Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Radiation Oncology

AIMS

Curative-intent (radical) radiotherapy aims to control local disease and cure non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The predominant subtypes of NSCLC are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The radiotherapy paradigm offered to patients does not differ according to these two subtypes. Relapse patterns and disease control rates for adenocarcinoma and SCC treated with radical radiotherapy were determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A radical radiotherapy database covering the period from 2004 to June 2016 was examined to determine the first sites of relapse and the actuarial local and distant control rates.

RESULTS

In total, 537 patients with known pathological subtype were treated over the period. In 39 (7%), the site of first relapse was uncertain. Of the remainder, 203 (41%) had adenocarcinoma and 295 (59%) had SCC. At a median follow-up of 16.4 months, 58% had relapsed. There was a difference in relapse patterns (chi-squared test P < 0.0005), with a higher rate of first relapse locally in SCC (42% of all patients versus 24%) and a higher rate of first relapse in the brain for adenocarcinoma (14% versus 3%). The actuarial local control rate was worse for SCC (hazard ratio 0.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5-0.9, P = 0.002). The brain metastasis-free survival was worse for adenocarcinoma (hazard ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 2.2-7.5, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is a difference in relapse patterns between NSCLC histological subtypes, indicating that these are distinct entities. This may have implications for follow-up policy and strategies to improve disease control.

Phase II Trial of a Trimodality Regimen for Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Using Chemotherapy As Induction Treatment With Concurrent Hyperfractionated Chemoradiation With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Followed by Subsequent Resection: A Single-Center Study

Purpose

We started a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy and concurrent hyperfractionated chemoradiotherapy followed by either surgery or boost chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced, stage III disease. The purpose is to achieve better survival in the surgery group with minimum morbidity and mortality.

Patients and Methods

Patients treated from 1998 to 2002 with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection for stage III NSCLC were analyzed. The treatment consisted of four cycles of induction chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by chemoradiotherapy with a reduced dose of carboplatin/paclitaxel and accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy with 1.5 Gy twice daily up to 45 Gy. After restaging, operable patients underwent thoracotomy. Inoperable patients received chemoradiotherapy up to 63 Gy. Study end points included resectability, pathologic response, and survival.

Results

One hundred twenty patients were enrolled; 25% patients had stage IIIA, 73% had stage IIIB, and 2% stage IV. After treatment, 47.5% had downstaging, 29.2% had stable disease, and 23.3% had progressive disease. Thirty patients (25%) were not eligible for operation because of progressive disease, stable disease, and/or functional deterioration with one treatment-related death. The 30-day mortality was 5% in patients who underwent operation. The 5-year survival rate for 120 patients was 21.7%, and it was 43.1% in patients with complete resection. In postoperative patients with stage N0 disease, 5-year survival was 53.3%; if stage N2 or N3 disease was still present, 5-year survival was 33.3%.

Conclusion

Staging and treatment with chemoradiotherapy and complete resection performed in experienced centers achieve acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Selective nodal irradiation on basis of (18)FDG-PET scans in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of selective nodal irradiation on basis of (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) on isolated nodal failure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A prospective study was performed of 60 patients with LD-SCLC. Radiotherapy was given to a dose of 45 Gy in twice-daily fractions of 1.5 Gy, concurrent with carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Only the primary tumor and the mediastinal lymph nodes involved on the pretreatment PET scan were irradiated. A chest computed tomography (CT) scan was performed 3 months after radiotherapy completion and every 6 months thereafter.

RESULTS

A difference was seen in the involved nodal stations between the pretreatment (18)F-deoxyglucose PET scans and computed tomography scans in 30% of patients (95% confidence interval, 20-43%). Of the 60 patients, 39 (65%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 52-76%) developed a recurrence; 2 patients (3%, 95% CI, 1-11%) experienced isolated regional failure. The median actuarial overall survival was 19 months (95% CI, 17-21). The median actuarial progression-free survival was 14 months (95% CI, 12-16). 12% (95% CI, 6-22%) of patients experienced acute Grade 3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0) esophagitis.

CONCLUSION

PET-based selective nodal irradiation for LD-SCLC resulted in a low rate of isolated nodal failures (3%), with a low percentage of acute esophagitis. These findings are in contrast to those from our prospective study of CT-based selective nodal irradiation, which resulted in an unexpectedly high percentage of isolated nodal failures (11%). Because of the low rate of isolated nodal failures and toxicity, we believe that our data support the use of PET-based SNI for LD-SCLC.

HI-CHART: a phase I/II study on the feasibility of high-dose continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of high-dose continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective, Phase I/II study, according to the risk for radiation pneumonitis, three risk groups were defined: V(20) <25%, V(20) 25-37%, and V(20) >37%. The dose was administered in three steps from 61.2 Gy/34 fractions/23 days to 64.8 Gy/36 fractions/24 days to 68.40 Gy/38 fractions/25 days (1.8 Gy b.i.d. with 8-h interval), using a three-dimensional conformal technique. Only the mediastinal lymph node areas that were positive on the pretreatment (18)F-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan were included in the target volume. The primary endpoint was toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 48 Stage I-IIIB patients were included. In all risk groups, 68.40 Gy/38 fractions/25 days could be administered. Maximal toxicity according to the risk groups was as follows: V(20) <25% (n = 35): 1 Grade 4 (G4) lung and 1 G3 reversible esophageal toxicity; V(20) 35-37% (n = 12): 1 G5 lung and 1 G3 reversible esophageal toxicity. For the whole group, local tumor recurrence occurred in 25% (95% confidence interval 14%-40%) of the patients, with 1 of 48 (2.1%; upper one-sided 95% confidence limit 9.5%) having an isolated nodal recurrence. The median actuarial overall survival was 20 months, with a 2-year survival rate of 36%.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy up to a dose of 68.40 Gy/38 fractions/25 days (a biologic equivalent of approximately 80 Gy when delivered in conventional fractionation) in patients with inoperable NSCLC and a V(20) up to 37% is feasible.

Final results of a Phase I/II dose escalation trial in non-small-cell lung cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) delivered within 6 weeks in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The impact of tumor volume and delivered dose on failure-free interval (FFI) and overall survival (OS) were also studied.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A Phase I/II trial was performed including inoperable NSCLC patients. According to the relative mean lung dose (rMLD), five risk groups with different starting doses were defined: Group 1, rMLD 0.0 to 0.12; Group 2, rMLD 0.12 to 0.18; Group 3, rMLD 0.18 to 0.24; Group 4, rMLD 0.24 to 0.31; and Group 5, rMLD 0.31 to 0.40. Patients underwent irradiation with 2.25 Gy per fraction and a fixed overall treatment time of 6 weeks. The dose was escalated with 6.75 Gy after 6 months follow-up without dose-limiting toxicity. If more than 30 fractions were prescribed, twice-daily irradiation was performed with at least a 6-h interval.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were included. Tumor Stage I or II was found in 53%, IIIA in 31%, and IIIB in 17%. The MTD was not achieved in risk Group 1 (reached dose, 94.5 Gy). For risk Groups 2 and 3 the MTD was 81 Gy. The 74.3-Gy dose was determined to be safe for Group 4 and the 60.8-Gy dose for Group 5. In 2 patients (5%) an isolated nodal relapse occurred. Based on multivariable analysis, higher doses significantly increased the FFI (p = 0.02) for the total group. The OS was increased in the lower risk groups (p = 0.05) but not in the higher risk groups (p = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation is safe up to 94.5 Gy in 42 fractions in 6 weeks in patients with an MLD 13.6 Gy or less. Higher doses are associated with a better FFI and OS for smaller tumor volumes. Involved-field irradiation results in a low percentage of isolated nodal relapses.

Omission of elective node irradiation on basis of CT-scans in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the patterns of recurrence when elective node irradiation was omitted in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).

METHODS

A prospective phase II study was undertaken in 27 patients with LD-SCLC without detectable distant metastases on CT scan. Chest radiotherapy to a dose of 45 Gy in 30 fractions in 3 weeks (1.5 Gy BID with 6 - 8 h interval) was delivered concurrently with carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Chest radiation started after a mean time of 17.7 days +/- 9.7 days (SD) (range: 0-33 days) after the beginning of chemotherapy. Only the primary tumour and the positive nodal areas on the pre-treatment CT scan were irradiated. A total of five chemotherapy cycles were administered, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients without disease progression. Isolated nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the regional nodes outside of the clinical target volume, in the absence of in-field failure.

RESULTS

After a median time of 18 months post-radiotherapy, 7 patients (26%, 95% CI 19.5-42.5%) developed a local recurrence. Three patients (crude rate 11%, 95% CI 2.4-29%), developed an isolated nodal failure, all of them in the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa. The median actuarial overall survival was 21 months (95% CI 15.3-26.7), and the median actuarial progression free survival was 16 months (95% CI 6.5-25.5). Eight patients developed an acute, reversible grade 3 (CTC 3.0) radiation oesophagitis (30%, 95% CI 14-50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the small sample size, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. However, the omission of elective nodal irradiation on the basis of CT scans in patients with LD-SCLC resulted in a higher than expected rate of isolated nodal failures in the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa. The incidence of acute, reversible oesophagitis was in the same range as reported with elective nodal fields. The safety of selective nodal irradiation in NSCLC should not be extrapolated to patients with LD-SCLC until more data are available. In the mean time, elective nodal irradiation should only be omitted in clinical trials.

Thoracic radiation therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: unanswered questions

The role of thoracic radiation therapy (RT; TRT) is now established in the management of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is increasing evidence in the literature in favor of early concurrent chemoradiation therapy, and a gold standard of care for patients with a good performance status is twice-daily TRT (45 Gy in 3 weeks) with concurrent cisplatin/etoposide. Five-year survival rates > 20% can be expected with this combined-modality approach. Although current clinical trials are exploring the efficacy of new chemotherapeutic strategies for the disease, essential questions related to the optimization of TRT remain unanswered. In particular, the optimal RT dose, fractionation, and treatment volume have not been defined. This review highlights the need for well-designed multinational trials aimed at the optimization and standardization of RT for limited-stage SCLC. These trials should integrate translational research studies to investigate the molecular basis of RT resistance and to develop biomarker profiles of prognosis.

Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer: A prospective clinical study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the patterns of recurrence when selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data is used in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A prospective Phase I/II study was undertaken on 44 patients with NSCLC without detectable distant metastases on CT and FDG-PET scan, delivering either 61.2 Gy in 34 fractions over 23 days or 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions over 24 days (1.8 Gy b.i.d. with 8-h interval). Only the primary tumor and the positive mediastinal areas on the pretreatment FDG-PET scan were irradiated. Isolated nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the regional nodes outside of the clinical target volume, in the absence of in-field failure.

RESULTS

The CT and FDG-PET stage distribution was as follows: Stage I: 8 patients (18%) and 13 patients (29%); Stage II: 6 patients (14%) and 10 patients (23%); Stage IIIA: 15 patients (34%) and 7 patients (16%); Stage IIIB: 15 patients (34%) and 14 patients (32%), respectively. After a median follow-up time of 16 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11-21 months) postradiotherapy, 11 patients (25%) developed a local recurrence. Only 1 patient (crude rate, 2.3%; upper bound of 95% CI, 10.3%), with a Stage II tumor on both CT and PET, developed an isolated nodal failure. The median actuarial overall survival was 21 months (95% CI, 14-28 months), and the median actuarial progression-free survival was 18 months (95% CI, 12-24 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Selective mediastinal node irradiation based on FDG-PET scan data in patients with NSCLC results in low isolated nodal failure rates. In the Phase I component of this trial, radiation dose escalation up to 64.8 Gy in 36 fractions over 24 days is feasible.

Surgery after multimodality treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer

Neoadjuvant treatment for Locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage IIIA and IIIB promises higher resection rates because of a reduction of the primary tumour and sterilisation of mediastinal nodes ("downstaging"). In this study we analyse the perioperative course and the long-term survival of patients with trimodality treatment. Between 03/1991 and 12/2002, 392 patients with NSCLC underwent resection after induction treatment. Included were 266 males and 126 females, age 55.8 +/- 9 (28-74), of whom 218 were stage-IIIA patients, 174 were stage-IIIB patients. Induction treatment included 3 courses of chemotherapy with cisplatin/etoposide or cisplatin/paclitaxel, followed by one course of chemotherapy with cisplatin/etoposide as well as hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy of the primary tumour and the mediastinal nodes with 45 Gy, followed by surgery. Before induction treatment all patients underwent mediastinoscopy. In patients with N3 disease mediastinoscopy was repeated before surgery. Resections included 133 pneumonectomies (34%), 15 bilobectomies (4%), 55 sleeve lobectomies (14%), 168 lobectomies (42.5%), 6 segmentectomies (1,5%), and 15 explorative thoracotomies (4%). In-hospital mortality rates amounted to 4.6% (18 patients) while postoperative morbidity ran up to 46% (180 patients). Morbidity and mortality rates were significantly higher in patients with Karnofsky status lower than 80% and patients older than 65 years. Bronchopleural fistulas occurred in 16 patients (3.2%). The protection of the bronchial stump or anastomosis with viable tissue, like pericardial fat, proves to be a significant factor for the reduction of septic complications. For NSCLC, the 5- and 7-year survival rates were 36% and 31%, respectively, for stage IIIA, and 26% for stage IIIB. This intensive trimodality treatment proves to be feasible. Treatment-related toxicities are overall moderate and acceptable. Accurate cardiopulmonary evaluation before surgery and reinforcement of bronchial stump or anastomosis can contribute to reducing complications. Induction treatment demonstrated a "downstaging effect", so that a clear trend for organ-sparing resection was observed. Long-term survival rates for selected groups look very promising when compared to historical controls.

Enduring challenge in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer with clinical stage IIIB: results of a trimodality approach

BACKGROUND

Stage IIIb (T4/N3) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is considered an inoperable disease and treatment is an enduring challenge. Surgery after induction therapy seems to improve locoregional control. We report the results of a phase II prospective trimodality trial (chemotherapy and concomitant radiotherapy plus surgery) in patients with stage IIIb NSCLC.

METHODS

From November 1992 to June 2000, 39 patients (37 men and 2 women, mean age 65 years) with clinical stage IIIb (34 T4N0 to 2, 4 T2 to 3N3, 1 T4N3, excluding T4 for malignant pleural effusion) entered the study. They received intravenous infusions of cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2) (days 1 to 4 and 25 to 28) combined with a total dose of 50.4 Gy radiotherapy delivered over 4 weeks (1.8 Gy daily). Upon clinical restaging responders underwent surgery.

RESULTS

All patients were available for clinical restaging. No complete response was observed. Twenty-one patients had partial response (53.8%), 16 had stable disease (41%), and 2 had progressive disease (5.2%). Hematologic toxicity was moderate. Twenty-two patients (56.4%), 21 with partial response and 1 with stable disease, underwent surgery with no perioperative death. A radical resection was possible in 21 cases. Nine lobectomies, 3 bilobectomies, and 9 pneumonectomies were performed. Complications occurred in 5 patients (23.6%). Fourteen of the patients who underwent surgery (66.6%) showed a pathologic downstaging. A complete pathologic response was obtained in 9 cases (49%). Overall 5-year survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 23%. Resected versus non-resected patients showed a significant difference: 38% versus 5.6% (p = 0.028, log rank).

CONCLUSIONS

This trimodal approach for stage IIIb NSCLC appears safe and effective. It provides good therapeutic results with acceptable morbidity in surgical cases.

Pulmonary function following high-dose radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To study changes of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) after radiotherapy (RT) of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in relation to radiation dose, tumor regression, and changes in lung perfusion.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty-two patients with inoperable NSCLC were evaluated with PFTs (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV(1)] and diffusion capacity [T(L,COc)]), a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, and a single photon emission CT (SPECT) lung perfusion scan, before and 3-4 months after RT. The reductions of PFTs and tumor volume were calculated. The lung perfusion was measured from pre- and post-RT SPECT scans, and the difference was defined as the measured perfusion reduction (MPR). In addition, the perfusion post-RT was estimated from the dose distribution using a dose-effect relation for regional lung perfusion, and compared with the pre-RT lung perfusion to obtain the predicted perfusion reduction (PPR). The difference between the actually measured and the PPR was defined as reperfusion. The mean lung dose (MLD) was computed and weighted with the pre-RT perfusion, resulting in the mean perfusion-weighted lung dose (MpLD). Changes of PFTs were evaluated in relation to tumor dose, MLD, MpLD, tumor regression, and parameters related to perfusion changes.

RESULTS

In a multivariate analysis, the total tumor dose and MLD were not associated with reductions of PFTs. Tumor regression resulted in a significant improvement of FEV(1) (p = 0.02), but was associated with a reduction of T(L,COc) (p = 0.05). The MpLD and the PPR showed a significant (p = 0.01 to 0.04) but low correlation (r = 0.24 to 0.31) with the reduction of both PFTs. The other parameters for perfusion changes, the MPR and reperfusion were not correlated with changes in PFTs.

CONCLUSION

The perfusion-related dose variables, the MpLD or the PPR, are the best parameters to estimate PFTs after RT. Tumor regression is associated with an improvement of FEV(1) and a decline of T(L,COc). Reperfusion was not associated with an improvement of global pulmonary function.

First results of a phase I/II dose escalation trial in non-small cell lung cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of dose escalation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The main eligibility criteria of the trial were: pathologically proven inoperable NSCLC, ECOG performance status <or=2, weight loss <10% and no chemotherapy within 6 weeks prior to the start of the radiotherapy treatment. No elective nodal irradiation was given. Patients were treated 5 days a week with 2.25 Gy per fraction and a 6 weeks overall treatment time; two fractions a day were given if more than 30 fractions were prescribed. Five risk groups were defined according to the relative mean lung dose (rMLD). Within each group the dose was escalated with three fractions per step (6.75 Gy). The next dose level opened after a toxicity-free follow-up of 6 months in three patients. The maximum tolerable dose has been reached if two out of six patients experience a dose-limiting toxicity (pneumonitis >or=grade 3 (SWOG), grade 3 early and grade 2 late esophageal toxicity or any other (RTOG) grade 3 or 4 complications).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were included. Tumor stage was I/II in 47%, IIIA in 33% and IIIB in 20%. The majority of the patients received a dose of 74.3 Gy (n=17) or 81.0 Gy (n=23). Radiation pneumonitis occurred in seven patients: four patients developed a grade 2, two patients grade 3 and one patient a grade 4. Esophageal toxicity was mild. In 50 patients tumor response at 3 months follow-up was evaluable. In six patients a complete response was recorded, in 38 a partial response, five patients had stable disease and one patient experienced progressive disease. Only one patient developed an isolated failure in an uninvolved nodal area. So far the radiation dose was safely escalated to 87.8 Gy in group 1 (lowest rMLD), 81.0 Gy in groups 2 and 3 and 74.3 Gy in group 4.

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy enables significant dose escalation in NSCLC. The maximum tolerable dose has not yet been reached in any risk group.

Can elective nodal irradiation be omitted in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer? Analysis of recurrences in a phase II study of induction chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To establish the recurrence patterns when elective mediastinal irradiation was omitted, patients with Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with sequential chemotherapy (CHT) and involved-field radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty patients were treated with either two or four cycles of induction CHT, followed by once-daily involved-field RT to 70 Gy, delivered using three-dimensional treatment planning. The contoured gross tumor volume consisted of the pre-CHT tumor volume and nodes with a short-axis diameter of > or = 1 cm. Patients were reevaluated at 3 and 6 months after RT using bronchoscopy and chest CT. Elective nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the regional nodes outside the clinical target volume, in the absence of in-field failure.

RESULTS

Of 43 patients who received doses > or = 50 Gy, 35% were disease free at last follow-up; in-field recurrences developed in 27% (of whom 16% had exclusively in-field recurrences); 18% had distant metastases exclusively. No elective nodal failure was observed. The median actuarial overall survival was 18 months (95% confidence interval 14-22) and the median progression-free survival was 12 months (95% confidence interval 6-18).

CONCLUSION

Omitting elective mediastinal irradiation did not result in isolated nodal failure. Future studies of concurrent CHT and RT for Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer should use involved-field RT to limit toxicity.

Curative radiotherapy for a second primary lung cancer arising after pneumonectomy -- techniques and results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Only limited data exist on the outcome of curative radiotherapy in patients who develop a second primary lung tumour after pneumonectomy. The treatment of eight such patients is described.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The case records of patients who underwent curative radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer after a previous pneumonectomy were reviewed. Treatment was delivered using 3D external radiotherapy to a dose of 50-70 Gy, in once-daily fractions of 2-2.5 Gy. An endobronchial brachytherapy boost was used in three patients. Original treatments were re-planned in an attempt to minimize the volume of irradiated lung.

RESULTS

A complete remission was achieved in five (of six) evaluable patients, but two patients subsequently developed a local relapse. All patients survived for a minimum of 1 year after treatment. Only one patient developed significant (grade 2) radiation pneumonitis. When treatments were re-planned to optimize beam arrangements, and when customized blocks were used, the mean lung volume receiving > or = 20 Gy (calculated for 70 Gy) decreased from 24.6+/-4.1 (range, 18-31%) to 17.3+/-5.1% (range, 12-26%). Similarly, the radiation conformity index improved from 0.44+/-0.11 to 0.61+/-0.06.

CONCLUSIONS

Involved-field radiotherapy can be curative in patients who develop a new lung tumour after pneumonectomy. Recent advances in defining target volumes, treatment planning and delivery are likely to improve upon these results.

Prognostically orientated multimodality treatment including surgery for selected patients of small-cell lung cancer patients stages IB to IIIB: long-term results of a phase II trial

Following mediastinoscopy, a prognostically orientated multimodality approach was chosen in selected small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiotherapy (Hf-RTx) and definitive surgery (S). Stage IB/IIA patients had four cycles of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) and surgery. Stage IIB/IIIA patients had three cycles PE followed by one cycle concurrent chemoradiation including Hf-RTx and surgery. Most stage IIIB patients were not planned for surgery and had CTx followed by sequential RTx or one cycle concurrent CTx/RTx. Of 46 consecutive patients (stage IB six, IIA two, IIB/IIIA 22, IIIB 16) 43 (94%) showed an objective response. Twenty-three of patients (72%) planned for inclusion of S were completely resected (R0) (IB 6/6, IIA 2/2, IIB/IIIA 13/22, IIIB 2/2). Overall toxicity was acceptable--one patient died of septicaemia, no perioperative deaths occurred. Median follow-up of patients alive (n = 21) is 52 months (30+ - 75+). Median survival and 5-year survival rate of all patients are 36 months and 46%, in R0 patients 68 months and 63% (R0-IIB/IIIA/IIIB: not yet reached and 67%). This multimodality treatment including surgery proved highly effective with 100% local control and remarkable long-term survival after complete resection, even in locally advanced SCLC stages IIB/IIIA patients.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery for selected non-small cell lung cancer IIIB subgroups: long-term results

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is feasible for selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer stage IIIb. The aim of this investigation was to analyze long-term results after this multimodality approach and to identify subgroups with improved long-term prognosis.

METHODS

From March 1991 to June 1996, 56 patients were entered. Three cycles of cisplatin (P) (60 mg/m2, days 1 + 7) and etoposide (E) (150 mg/m2, days 3 to 5 qd 22) were followed by one cycle of radiotherapy/chemotherapy (RTx/CTx) (45 Gy, 1.5 Gy bid/3 weeks with P 50 mg/m2 days 2 + 9/E 100 mg/m2 days 4 to 6) followed by repeat mediastinoscopy and surgery.

RESULTS

There were 46 men and 10 women (age 34 to 69 years, median 55 years; World Health Organization status 0 to 2, median 1). Twenty-eight had T4, and 32 had proven N3, in detail: T4N0/1, 10; T4N2, 14; T3N3, 9; T4N3, 4; and T1/2N3, 19. Thirty-four (61%) were operated on; 27 (48%) were completely (R0) resected. Survival at 5 years is 26% for all, and 43% for R0 patients. Toxicity included two deaths (one septicemia, one anastomosis insufficiency).

CONCLUSIONS

This intensive program proved to be highly effective in unfavorable IIIB subgroups with promising long-term survival for T4 tumors as well as N3 disease.

Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: mature data from the randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering committee

BACKGROUND AND METHOD

A randomised controlled trial in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared CHART which employs 36 fractions of 1.5 Gy 3 times per day to give 54 Gy in 12 consecutive days with conventional radiotherapy-30 fractions of 2 Gy to a total dose of 60 Gy in 6 weeks. A total of 563 patients were entered between April 1990 and April 1995. This report is based upon the data updated to 1 April 1998.

RESULTS

The analysis of the mature data shows that the benefits previously reported have been maintained. Overall there was a 22% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 9% from 20 to 29% (P = 0.008) and a 21% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.033). In the large subgroup of patients with squamous cell cancer which accounted for 81% of the cases, there was a 30% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2 year survival of 13% from 20 to 33% (P = 0.0007) and a 27% reduction in the relative risk of local progression (P = 0.012). Furthermore, in squamous carcinoma there was a 25% reduction in the relative risk of local and/or distant progression (P = 0.025) and 24% reduction in the relative risk of metastasis (P = 0.043). There was no evidence that CHART gave more or less benefit in any other subgroup.

CONCLUSION

This analysis of mature data confirms that CHART is superior to conventional radiotherapy in achieving local tumour control and survival in locally advanced NSCLC. This demonstrates the importance of cellular repopulation as a cause of failure in the radiotherapy of NSCLC. The reduction in the risk of metastasis confirms that improved local tumour control, even in lung cancer, can reduce the incidence of metastasis. This trial shows that control of local tumour can lead to an improvement in long term survival.

[Limitations and perspectives of postoperative radiotherapy in bronchial cancer]

The role of postoperative irradiation for lung cancer remains a controversial issue. The available data suggest a reduction in local relapse in cases of positive mediastinal lymph node, but how this benefit translates into survival is not known. The current indications include tumors with positive mediastinal lymph node and incomplete resection with micro- or macroscopical residue. Nevertheless, postoperative irradiation requires a meticulous technique to avoid inducing life-threatening complications to vital organs such as the heart or the lung.

Weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. A phase I/II dose escalation trial

In this phase I/II study, we investigated the radiosensitising effects of docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 30 patients with stage IIIb (18 patients) and IV (12 patients) NSCLC were treated with 64 Gy of accelerated chest radiotherapy (5-week schedule using a concomitant boost technique) and docetaxel on a weekly basis. The docetaxel starting dose level was 20 mg/m2/week and was escalated by 10 mg/m2 increments in cohorts of 10 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 asthenia) was observed in 6 of 10 patients treated at the 40 mg/m2/week dose level, enforcing a 50% dose reduction in 4 patients. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in 5 of 30 patients (17%), 3 of which were treated at the high dose level. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 3 (10%) patients. A significant decrease in the absolute lymphocyte count was observed in all patients; the nadir was reached on day 28 (mean +/- standard deviation (S.D.) = 539 +/- 363/ml) compared with pretreatment values (mean +/- S.D. = 1842 +/- 863/ml; P = 0.002). 6 out of 30 patients (20%) experienced grade 3 oesophagitis, resulting in a 1-2 week delay in overall treatment time. Complete response of the primary tumour was observed in 8 (27%) patients assessed 2 months after treatment. 4 of these patients had disease resistant to previous docetaxel-containing chemotherapy. A partial response occurred in 15 of 30 patients (50%) for an overall response rate of 77% (95% confidence interval (CI) 60-92%). Radiosensitisation with docetaxel is feasible and the recommended dose for further phase II studies is 30 mg/m2/week. Further phase II studies are required to confirm the remarkably high response rate observed in the present trial.

Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) versus conventional radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomised multicentre trial. CHART Steering Committee

BACKGROUND

Human tumour cells can proliferate rapidly, and giving radiotherapy in many small fractions may reduce long-term normal-tissue morbidity. In response to these observations, we developed the CHART (continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy) regimen, which uses thirty-six small fractions of 1.5 Gy given three times per day, to give 54 Gy in only 12 consecutive days. We report the long-term follow-up of a trial of CHART versus conventional radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

563 patients were entered by thirteen centres between April, 1990, and March, 1995. We included patients with NSCLC localised to the chest with a performance status of 0 or 1 in whom radical radiotherapy was chosen as the definitive management. Patients were randomly allocated in a 3:2 ratio to CHART or conventional radiotherapy. The latter was thirty fractions of 2 Gy to a total dose of 60 Gy in 6 weeks.

RESULTS

The groups were well matched for possible prognostic factors. Overall there was a 24% reduction in the relative risk of death, which is equivalent to an absolute improvement in 2-year survival of 9% from 20% to 29% (p = 0.004, 95% CI 0.63-0.92). Subgroup analyses (predefined) suggest that the largest benefit occurred in patients with squamous cell carcinomas (82% of the cases), in whom there was a 34% reduction in the relative risk of death (an absolute improvement at 2 years of 14% from 19% to 33%). During the first 3 months, severe dysphagia occurred more often in the CHART group than in the group on conventional radiotherapy (19 vs 3%). Otherwise, there were no important differences in short-term or long-term morbidity.

INTERPRETATION

CHART compared with conventional radiotherapy gave a significant improvement in survival of patients with NSCLC. Further improvement may be achieved with dose escalation in conformal radiotherapy, by the addition of cytotoxic chemotherapy, and by hypoxic cell radiosensitisation.