Brain relapses in chemotherapy-treated small cell lung cancer: a retrospective review of two time-dose regimens of therapeutic brain irradiation

The role of whole brain radiation therapy in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

Target population

This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed single brain metastases amenable to surgical resection; however, the recommendation does not apply to relatively radiosensitive tumors histologies (i.e., small cell lung cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, germ cell tumors and multiple myeloma).

Recommendation

Surgical resection plus WBRT versus WBRT alone

Level 1 Class I evidence supports the use of surgical resection plus post-operative WBRT, as compared to WBRT alone, in patients with good performance status (functionally independent and spending less than 50% of time in bed) and limited extra-cranial disease. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for patients with poor performance scores, advanced systemic disease, or multiple brain metastases.

If WBRT is used, is there an optimal dosing/fractionation schedule?

Target population

This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Recommendation

Level 1 Class I evidence suggests that altered dose/fractionation schedules of WBRT do not result in significant differences in median survival, local control or neurocognitive outcomes when compared with “standard” WBRT dose/fractionation. (i.e., 30 Gy in 10 fractions or a biologically effective dose (BED) of 39 Gy10).

If WBRT is used, what impact does tumor histopathology have on treatment outcomes?

Target population

This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed brain metastases.

Recommendation

Given the extremely limited data available, there is insufficient evidence to support the choice of any particular dose/fractionation regimen based on histopathology.

The following question is fully addressed in the surgery guideline paper within this series by Kalkanis et al. Given that the recommendation resulting from the systematic review of the literature on this topic is also highly relevant to the discussion of the role of WBRT in the management of brain metastases, this recommendation has been included below.

Does the addition of WBRT after surgical resection improve outcomes when compared with surgical resection alone?

Target population

This recommendation applies to adults with newly diagnosed single brain metastases amenable to surgical resection.

Recommendation

Surgical resection plus WBRT versus surgical resection alone

Level 1 Surgical resection followed by WBRT represents a superior treatment modality, in terms of improving tumor control at the original site of the metastasis and in the brain overall, when compared to surgical resection alone.

Effectiveness of whole brain radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumour in adults, estimated to occur in up to 40% of patients with cancer. Despite being used in clinical practice for 50 years, the effectiveness of whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) on survival and quality of life. To identify whether patient performance status, number of brain metastases, extent of extracranial disease and primary site of cancer are important effect modifiers.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

Electronic searches of four databases, augmented by hand searches of the most frequently encountered journal and assessment of the reference lists of consensus statements and all retrieved papers. Included papers underwent structured data extraction, assessment and qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS

Thirty-two primary studies were included, with a range of study designs, methodological quality, pre-treatment variables, interventions and outcome measures. From the limited evidence available, survival appeared to increase when patients were selected by performance status (survival increasing from approximately three to seven months in high performance status groups, as defined by Karnofsky performance status or Recursive Partitioning Analysis classification). The evidence suggests no survival benefit when patients with poor performance status were treated with whole brain radiotherapy. No studies undertook direct measurement of patients' quality of life. Surrogate measures of patients' quality of life, such as improvement in neurological function or improvement/maintenance of KPS > or =70, produced response rates ranging from 7 to 90%.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneity of study designs, quality and outcomes necessitates caution in interpreting the review findings. WBRT appears to be of benefit in higher performance status patients but not in low performance status patients. This suggests a basis for current practice, however further robust trial evidence is required.

Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy--a phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

PURPOSE

Approximately 60% of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) develop brain metastases. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) gives symptomatic improvement in more than 50% of these patients. Because brain metastases are a sign of systemic progression, and chemotherapy was found to be effective as well, it becomes questionable whether WBRT is the only appropriate therapy in this situation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a phase III study, SCLC patients with brain metastases were randomized to receive teniposide with or without WBRT. Teniposide 120 mg/m(2) was given intravenously three times a week, every 3 weeks. WBRT (10 fractions of 3 Gy) had to start within 3 weeks from the start of chemotherapy. Response was measured clinically and by computed tomography of the brain.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty eligible patients were randomized. A 57% response rate was seen in the combined-modality arm (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 69%), and a 22% response rate was seen in the teniposide-alone arm (95% CI, 12% to 34%) (P<.001). Time to progression in the brain was longer in the combined-modality group (P=.005). Clinical response and response outside the brain were not different. The median survival time was 3.5 months in the combined-modality arm and 3.2 months in the teniposide-alone arm. Overall survival in both groups was not different (P=.087).

CONCLUSION

Adding WBRT to teniposide results in a much higher response rate of brain metastases and in a longer time to progression of brain metastases than teniposide alone. Survival was poor in both groups and not significantly different.

Chemotherapy for brain metastases of lung cancer: a review

In lung cancer patients brain metastases develop with a high frequency. For years radiotherapy has been the standard treatment for these patients. Here we review the experience with chemotherapy for brain metastases in lung cancer patients. The concept of the brain as pharmacological sanctuary site when brain metastases are present is challenged and it is argued that chemotherapy does play a role in this situation. Recent clinical trials indicate that the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy may become the standard treatment for lung cancer patients with brain metastases. It is unclear whether for micrometastatic disease to the brain, blood brain barrier function is of importance for the outcome of chemotherapy in lung cancer patients with respect to the development of overt brain metastases. Areas of improvement of delivery of cytotoxic agents to the brain when brain metastases have not yet developed are discussed.

Irradiation of brain metastases from lung cancer: a retrospective study

A total of 94 patients with brain metastases from lung carcinomas were treated with irradiation of their brain metastases. Two fractionation schedules were applied, a non-conventional one (76 patients) mixing hypofractionation and accelerated hyperfractionation to a total dose of 47 Gy and a conventional one (18 patients), with 3 Gy once a day to a total dose of 30 or 36 Gy. No benefit was found for the non-conventional treatment schedule over the conventional one. A difference in survival was demonstrated between patients whose brain metastases originated from adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the lung with a median survival of 3.5 and 1.9 months, respectively (P = 0.006). Median survival of patients with brain metastases from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was 2.8 months, and when compared with the squamous cell carcinoma group, there was no statistically improved survival (P = 0.12). There were indications of a better palliative effect in adenocarcinomas compared with squamous or large cell carcinomas. In a few patients (1/22 adenocarcinoma and 7/32 SCLC), the patients were free from malignant cells in the brain at autopsy, demonstrating that irradiation of brain metastases might be efficient in certain patients.

Brain-only metastases of small cell lung cancer; efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy. An EORTC phase II study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of WBRT as a single treatment modality in patients with brain metastases of small cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients had brain metastases of small cell lung cancer without any sign of tumour outside the brain and were treated with 10 x 3.0 Gy WBRT. Response and neurological functions were evaluated after 6, 18 and 36 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty of 22 eligible patients were evaluable for response. In six patients a complete response was seen and in five patients a partial response was seen giving a response rate of 50% (95% CI 28-72%). Response duration was 5.4 months (range 63-260 days) and median survival was 4.7 months (range 14-743 days). In the majority of patients the first site of progression after WBRT was in the central nervous system. Twelve of the patients had stabilization or improvement of the neurological function.

CONCLUSION

WBRT for brain metastases of small cell lung cancer gives a 50% response rate with stabilization or improvement of neurological function. Response duration and survival are short.