Effect of thiopental on hippocampal GABA receptors in rat brain

Involvement of GABAergic systems in manifestation of pharmacological activity of desipramine

We have conducted this study to elucidate the influence of GABAergic systems on manifestation of pharmacological activity of desipramine using both pharmacological and electrophysiological methods. Desipramine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly blocked the adjuvant-induced thermal hyperalgesia, which was facilitated by treatment with the GABA(A) antagonist picrotoxin (2 mg/kg, i.p.) or the GABA(B) antagonist saclofen (2 mg/kg, i.p.). This analgesic effect of desipramine was antagonized by post-treatment with picrotoxin or saclofen. However, none of these compounds showed any effect in normal animals without adjuvant-induced inflammation. In a slice preparation of the hippocampus, treatment with GABA (10(-5)-5 x 10(-4) M), baclofen (10(-5)-10(-4) M) or muscimol (10(-5)-10(-4) M) inhibited the field potential evoked in pyramidal neurons by Schaffer collateral stimulation. The inhibitory effect of GABA was facilitated by concurrent application of desipramine, carbamazepine or diazepam at a concentration of 5 x 10(-5)-2 x 10(-4) M. The rank of order of facilitation is: desipramine > carbamazepine > diazepam. Desipramine also enhanced the inhibitory effect of baclofen and muscimol. These results suggest that desipramine causes GABAergic systems to activate still more, and this phenomenon appears to be involved in manifestation of the pharmacological activity of desipramine such as antinociception.

Use-dependent regulation of GABAA receptors

Prolonged occupancy of GABAA receptors by ligands, including GABA and benzodiazepine agonists, sets in motion a series of mechanisms that can be termed use-dependent regulation. These mechanisms can be subdivided into two distinct pathways, one for GABAA receptor downregulation and another for upregulation. Treatment of cortical neurons with GABA or benzodiazepines in cultures opens the pathway for GABAA receptor downregulation, which includes (in putative temporal order): (1) desensitization (tachyphylaxis), (2) sequestration (endocytosis) of subunit polypeptides and uncoupling of allosteric interactions between GABA and benzodiazepine binding sites, (3) subunit polypeptide degradation, and (4) repression of subunit gene expression. The end-point of GABAA receptor downregulation, a reduction in receptor number, is postulated to be established initially by degradation of the receptor protein and then maintained by a diminished level of de novo synthesis. Benzodiazepine treatment of many preparations, including cells expressing recombinant GABAA receptors, may elicit only desensitization, sequestration, or uncoupling, without a decline in receptor number. Components of the GABAA receptor downregulation pathway are also evoked by chronic administration of GABAmimetics, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and neurosteroids in animals. This downregulation correlates with the establishment of tolerance to and physical dependence on the pharmacological effects of these drugs, suggesting a cellular model for this behavior. The upregulation of GABAA receptors is observed as one of the neurotrophic actions of GABA, primarily in cultured cerebellar granule cells. Upregulation in culture is caused by enhanced expression of genes for GABAA receptor subunits and correlates with the establishment of GABAergic circuitry in the developing cerebellum. Thus, both the upregulation and downregulation of GABAA receptors appear to represent use-dependent pathways for guiding synaptic plasticity in the vertebrate central nervous system.

Antagonism by glibenclamide of the effect of morphine in hippocampal preparations

We previously showed that morphine lowered the affinity of Ca2+ antagonist binding and subsequently enhanced field potentials in hippocampal preparations. In the present study, the effect of various K+ channel antagonists on these actions of morphine was studied. Higher Kd value of [3H]nitrendipine binding was obtained for membranes prepared from slices treated with morphine. Concomitant treatment of slices with morphine and tetramethylammonium (TMA) or glibenclamide attenuated the effect of morphine. Apamin and mast cell-degranulating (MCD) peptide were without effect on morphine-induced change in [3H]nitrendipine binding. In those experiments, no change in concentration of binding sites was observed. Glibenclamide reduced the morphine enhancement of field potentials. These results suggested the regulation of Ca2+ channels by morphine through K+ channel opening.

Barbiturates and the GABAA receptor complex

The GABA synapse plays an important role in the pharmacologic effects of barbiturates and the mechanisms involved in barbiturate tolerance and dependence. A synopsis of the effects which have been reported to date is found in Tables 1 and 2. Although the acute changes in neurotransmitter uptake and release are nonselective, a lag in the ability of the GABA synapse to compensate for discontinuation of barbiturate exposure may be important in the symptoms of withdrawal. Barbiturates cause changes in the properties of many receptors, but manipulations of the GABAA receptor in vivo correlate with changes in the therapeutic and toxicologic responses to barbiturates, indicating that the GABAA receptor complex plays a pivotal role in the effects of barbiturates. Experiments done in several laboratories show that barbiturate tolerance and dependence cause subtle changes in the properties of the GABAA receptor complex. These observations suggest that decreased GABA-stimulated chloride channel activity and reduced ability to modulate it may be important in causing barbiturate tolerance and the symptoms observed in withdrawal. Selection of drug-resistant rodent strains suggests that there may be genetic factors involved in drug tolerance and dependence. The complexity of the responses of the GABA synapse to both acute and prolonged exposure to barbiturates indicates that it is a valuable model for understanding how the central nervous system responds to drugs and the mechanisms involved in drug addiction.

Changes in [3H]nitrendipine binding and gamma-aminobutyric acid release in rat hippocampus following repeated morphine administration

An antagonistic effect of calcium on the action of morphine was studied in rat hippocampal slices. The effect of repeated administration of morphine on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release and binding of [3H]nitrendipine, a calcium antagonist, was also examined. (1) In rat brain hippocampal slices, morphine enlarged the amplitude of the field potentials evoked in pyramidal neurons, disinhibiting them through basket cells. When the calcium concentration was elevated, potentiation of the field potentials by morphine was reduced. Decrease of the calcium concentration, on the other hand, enhanced the potentiating effect of morphine. Following repeated administration of morphine, its enhancing effect on the field potentials in slices was not observed. (2) In hippocampal membrane fractions obtained from rats repeatedly treated with morphine, enhancement of [3H]nitrendipine binding was observed. (3) In hippocampal slice preparations from rats receiving morphine repeatedly, K+ (45 mM)-stimulated [3H]GABA efflux was enhanced. The above results indicate that morphine antagonizes calcium, thereby reducing the release of transmitters. Furthermore, increase in calcium channels following repeated treatment of rats with morphine may explain the mechanism underlying development of tolerance.

Effect of ethanol on hippocampal GABA receptors in the rat brain

The effect of ethanol on GABA receptors was studied in hippocampal slices and membrane preparations of the rat brain. In slice preparation, ethanol enhanced the GABA inhibition of the population spikes evoked in CA 1 pyramidal cells by Schaffer collateral stimulation. The effect of ethanol was dose-dependent being observed with minimal concentration of 70 mM. In 3H-GABA binding experiments, ethanol enhanced the binding to fresh membranes with no change in the affinity. Maximal stimulation was observed at ethanol concentration of 70 mM. In hippocampal slices or membrane preparations obtained from ethanol- or barbital-administered rats chronically, ethanol failed to enhance GABA function. Thus, the present study demonstrated the involvement of GABA in central effect of ethanol. Also suggested in GABA was the involvement in the development of cross-tolerance between ethanol and barbiturates.