Microchimerism frequency two to thirty years after cadaveric kidney transplantation

Mixed chimerism and split tolerance: mechanisms and clinical correlations

Establishing hematopoietic mixed chimerism can lead to donor-specific tolerance to transplanted organs and may eliminate the need for long-term immunosuppressive therapy, while also preventing chronic rejection. In this review, we discuss central and peripheral mechanisms of chimerism induced tolerance. However, even in the long-lasting presence of a donor organ or donor hematopoietic cells, some allogeneic tissues from the same donor can be rejected; a phenomenon known as split tolerance. With the current goal of creating mixed chimeras using clinically feasible amounts of donor bone marrow and with minimal conditioning, split tolerance may become more prevalent and its mechanisms need to be explored. Some predisposing factors that may increase the likelihood of split tolerance are immunogenicity of the graft, certain donor-recipient combinations, prior sensitization, location and type of graft and minimal conditioning chimerism induction protocols. Additionally, split tolerance may occur due to a differential susceptibility of various types of tissues to rejection. The mechanisms involved in a tissue's differential susceptibility to rejection include the presence of polymorphic tissue-specific antigens and variable sensitivity to indirect pathway effector mechanisms. Finally, we review the clinical attempts at allograft tolerance through the induction of chimerism; studies that are revealing the complex relationship between chimerism and tolerance. This relationship often displays split tolerance, and further research into its mechanisms is warranted.

Detection of HLA-DRB1 microchimerism using nested polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis

For the detection of microchimerism, molecular methods detecting donor-specific HLA-DRB1 alleles in the recipient are most commonly used. Nested polymerase chain reaction sequence specific primer (nested PCR-SSP) methods widely used to increase the sensitivity of detection have been reported to give frequent false-positive reactions. We have developed a new method combining nested PCR with single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (nested PCR-SSCP) and tested the 1 to 0.00001% level of microchimerism for 27 different HLA-DRB1 alleles. For most (26/27) of the HLA-DRB1 alleles tested, this method could detect 0.01 to 0.001% of microchimerism and its sensitivity was equal to or better than that of nested PCR-SSP tested in parallel. Its specificity was verified by visualizing particular DRB1-specific SSCP bands under test. Nested PCR-SSP indicated frequent false-positive reactions, mainly caused by nonspecific amplification of DRB3/B4/B5 alleles present in the major (recipient) DNAs. We have compared a real-time quantitative PCR for non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) target (insertion/deletion marker) using a commercial kit (AlleleSEQR Chimerism assay), and its microchimerism detection sensitivity (around 0.1%) was 1 step (10 times) lower than that of nested PCR-SSP or -SSCP methods for HLA-DRB1 alleles. We validated that the newly designed nested PCR-SSCP affords good sensitivity and specificity and may be useful for studying microchimerism in clinical settings.

Should microchimerism turn into rejection prophylactics?

Non-self cells can circulate in the body of an individual after any sort of contact with an allogeneic source of cells, thus creating a situation of chimerism that can be transient or prolonged over time. This situation may appear after stem cell transplantation, pregnancy, transfusion or transplantation. Concerning transplantation, many hypotheses have been formulated regarding the existence, persistence and role of these circulating cells in the host. We will review the principal hypotheses that have been formulated for years since the first description of non-self circulating cells in mammals to the utilization of artificially induced chimerism protocols for the achievement of tolerance.

Outcomes 18 months after the first human partial face transplantation

BACKGROUND

We performed the first human partial face allograft on November 27, 2005. Here we report outcomes up to 18 months after transplantation.

METHODS

The postsurgical induction immunosuppression protocol included thymoglobulins combined with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Donor hematopoietic stem cells were infused on postoperative days 4 and 11. Sequential biopsy specimens were taken from a sentinel skin graft, the facial skin, and the oral mucosa. Functional progress was assessed by tests of sensory and motor function performed monthly. Psychological support was provided before and after transplantation.

RESULTS

Sensitivity to light touch, as assessed with the use of static monofilaments, and sensitivity to heat and cold had returned to normal at 6 months after transplantation. Motor recovery was slower, and labial contact allowing complete mouth closure was achieved at 10 months. Psychological acceptance of the graft progressed as function improved. Rejection episodes occurred on days 18 and 214 after transplantation and were reversed. A decrease in inulin clearance led to a change in immunosuppressive regimen from tacrolimus to sirolimus at 14 months. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy was introduced at 10 months to prevent recurrence of rejection. There have been no subsequent rejection episodes. At 18 months, the patient is satisfied with the aesthetic result.

CONCLUSIONS

In this patient who underwent the first partial face transplantation, the functional and aesthetic results 18 months after transplantation are satisfactory.

Microchimerism and renal transplantation: doubt still persists

OBJECTIVE

We sought to study microchimerism in a group of kidney transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, the peripheral blood microchimerism (PBM) after renal transplantation was retrospectively evaluated in 32 male-to-female recipients of living unrelated or cadaveric donor renal transplants. Using a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification specific for SRY region of the Y chromosome, microchimerism was detected with a sensitivity of 1:1,000,000. Recipients were compared according to the presence of PBM, acute and chronic rejection episodes, type of allotransplant, recipient and donor age at transplantation, previous male labor or blood transfusion, allograft function (serum creatinine level), and body mass index.

RESULTS

Among 32 recipients, 7 (21.9%) were positive for PBM upon multiple testing at various posttransplant times. All microchimeric recipients had received kidneys from living unrelated donors. No significant difference was observed with regard to other parameters. In addition the acute rejection rate in the microchimeric group was 3 (42%) versus 4 (16%) in the nonmicrochimeric recipients (not significant).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggested better establishment of microchimerism after living donor kidney transplantation. However, doubt persists concerning the true effect of microchimerism after renal transplantation. It seems that microchimerism alone has no major protective role upon renal allograft survival.

Chimerism in organ transplantation: conflicting experiments and clinical observations

The concepts of chimerism has influenced our thinking about tolerance and rejection of organs and tissues since the beginning of modern transplantation. In macrochimerism, persisting donor-specific cells are easily detectable by flow cytometry at levels of several to 100%, usually after transient lymphoablation and bone marrow (or other cell) transplantation. Microchimerism refers to a state in which donor cells persist at low levels (1 cell per 10(4) or 10(5) or less), frequently detectable by molecular techniques and usually consisting of class II dendritic cells. Although macrochimerism is frequently associated with donor-specific tolerance in many experimental animals and people, instances occur in which macrochimerism can be produced, but tolerance is not achieved. Also, in large animal models, macrochimerism and associated tolerance can be produced but macrochimerism can then disappear, yet tolerance persists. Clinically, states of microchimerism can exist, but rejection still occurs. Also, persisting microchimerism does not necessarily correlate with clinical tolerance or the ability to wean from or reduce immunosuppressive drugs. Recent experiments in several rodents using bone marrow to induce macrochimerism and tolerance have shown that establishment of the macrochimeric state does not necessarily produce tolerance. The presence of class II positive cells in the donor bone marrow inoculum is essential for tolerance induction in these models.

Flow cytometric "rare event analysis": a standardized approach to the analysis of donor cell chimerism

Lack of standardization of methods and detection limits contributes to the controversial results regarding microchimerism after organ transplantation and has prompted the development of a standardized, reproducible, "easy-to-use" flow cytometric method for this type of "rare event analysis".EDTA-blood of healthy, HLA-typed donors was stained simultaneously with FITC- and biotin-labeled HLA-class I antibodies (One Lambda) as well as Cy5-PE-labeled CD45 (Medac, Hamburg) according to a standard protocol and analysed on a Coulter EPICS XL Flow cytometer (FCM). An absolute range of positivity (mean MESF+/- 1 STD) was determined for 22 HLA-specific antibodies. The range of positivity ranged between 5000 and 20,000 MESF (anti-A23, 24(9) FITC) and 40,000-140,000 (anti-Bw6 FITC). The frequency of nonspecific positive signals using nonstained cells, isotype-controls and irrelevant HLA antibodies was between 0.01% and about 0.5%, in some samples up to 1.4%, with an MESF between 8000 and 150,000, thus interfering clearly with the defined positive range of most antibodies tested. Using an "HLA antibody cocktail", combining FITC- and PE-labeled antibodies for different HLA specificities and thereby creating an internal control, the identification of donor cells was improved but was only rarely applicable. Due to the lack of highly reactive antibodies, FCM analysis was not suitable for the reliable identification of very low numbers of donor hematopoetic cells despite the theoretical advantages of flow cytometric detection of rare events. The single parameter approach was hampered by a significant frequency of nonspecific positive signals, which were easily mistaken as specific (true) positive signals, whereas the multiparameter approach could only be used in selected cases.

Infusion of donor spleen cells and rejection in liver transplant recipients

Intact or inactivated donor lymphoid cells have been found to downregulate the alloimmune response in a number of experimental models. We conducted a randomized, prospective, double blind, and placebo-controlled trial to determine whether heat-treated donor spleen cells would affect early rejection after liver transplantation. Donor spleen was obtained during organ procurement for 40 patients undergoing liver transplantation. All patients were treated with cyclosporine, azathioprine and steroids. The patients were randomized after surgery to receive either heat-treated (45 degrees C for 1 h) spleen cells or placebo. Patients underwent protocol biopsies at 1 wk, 4 and 12 months, or as needed. Biopsies were reviewed in a blind fashion and scored according to the Banff consensus criteria. Randomization resulted in 19 patients in the spleen cell group and 21 in the placebo group. One-yr graft survival was 94 and 100%, respectively. Early rejection was more frequent in the spleen cell group (61 vs. 35%, p, not significant). The histopathological rejection activity index at 7 d was also higher for the patients in the spleen cell group: 39% of spleen cell treated patients had a score of 4 or higher as opposed to 5% in the placebo group (p < 0.01). The mean score was 2.9 +/- 2.8 for the spleen cell group versus 1.3 + 1.7 for the placebo group (p = 0.034). It is concluded that heat-treated donor spleen cells given within 24 h after liver transplantation were not clinically beneficial and increased the intensity of rejection in 7-d protocol liver biopsies.

Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction With Sequence-Specific Primers Typing for HLA-A, -B, and -C Alleles: Detection of Microchimerism in DR-Matched Individuals

It is widely accepted that donor leukocytes survive within the recipient periphery after blood transfusion or solid organ transplantation. The significance of this microchimerism remains unclear, partially because of the insecurity of assays used to detect the donor-derived material. The techniques used to detect donor-derived DNA within recipient peripheral blood rely largely on major histocompatibility complex class II polymorphism. We and others have shown that the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) typing for HLA class II alleles can be increased 100-fold by the addition of a primary amplification step (nested PCR-SSP). We have now extended this technique to encompass typing for HLA class I alleles, thereby adding flexibility to microchimerism testing by enabling testing of recipients HLA-DR matched with their donors. However, the high level of sensitivity achieved with the technique (1:100,000) leads to a concomitant decrease in the specificity that results in the amplification of unexpected products, a phenomenon we encountered in the development of our nested PCR-SSP typing system for HLA class II alleles. We describe here how it is possible to compensate for these anomalies by including multiple testing of a pretransfusion sample that acts as a specificity control, establishing a rigorous baseline for subsequent analysis.

Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction With Sequence-Specific Primers Typing for HLA-A, -B, and -C Alleles: Detection of Microchimerism in DR-Matched Individuals

It is widely accepted that donor leukocytes survive within the recipient periphery after blood transfusion or solid organ transplantation. The significance of this microchimerism remains unclear, partially because of the insecurity of assays used to detect the donor-derived material. The techniques used to detect donor-derived DNA within recipient peripheral blood rely largely on major histocompatibility complex class II polymorphism. We and others have shown that the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) typing for HLA class II alleles can be increased 100-fold by the addition of a primary amplification step (nested PCR-SSP). We have now extended this technique to encompass typing for HLA class I alleles, thereby adding flexibility to microchimerism testing by enabling testing of recipients HLA-DR matched with their donors. However, the high level of sensitivity achieved with the technique (1:100,000) leads to a concomitant decrease in the specificity that results in the amplification of unexpected products, a phenomenon we encountered in the development of our nested PCR-SSP typing system for HLA class II alleles. We describe here how it is possible to compensate for these anomalies by including multiple testing of a pretransfusion sample that acts as a specificity control, establishing a rigorous baseline for subsequent analysis.

Stable lung allograft outcome correlates with the presence of intragraft donor-derived leukocytes

BACKGROUND

The role of bone marrow-derived "passenger" leukocytes in the outcome of solid organ transplantation remains controversial. This study tested the relationship between high levels of donor-derived leukocytes within the transplanted organ and clinical outcome after lung transplantation.

METHODS

Sequential bronchoalveolar lavage samples were obtained from human lung allograft recipients. Leukocytes of donor origin in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were detected using two-color immunofluorescence, and the results were correlated with multiple clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Mean donor leukocyte levels for the first 200 days after transplantation were higher in patients with a good transplantation outcome compared with those patients who lost their grafts due to acute rejection (AR) or developed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. The presence of low numbers of donor-derived leukocytes for the first 200 days after transplantation was found to be a significant risk factor for graft loss due to either acute or chronic rejection (P=0.032). Nearly all patients (85%) experienced AR episodes. However, the time to onset of severe AR episodes was significantly longer (P=0.049), and the incidence of these episodes reduced, in patients who maintained high numbers of donor-derived leukocytes for the first 200 days after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of high numbers of donor-derived leukocytes, particularly macrophages, in the transplanted lung in the first 200 days after transplantation was associated with stable graft function. Donor-derived leukocytes were reduced or absent in patients with a poor transplantation outcome. These findings rule out a negative influence of persisting donor leukocytes and are consistent with the emerging two-way models of transplant tolerance.

Analysis of the relationship between chimerism and the allgeneic humoral response

BACKGROUND

Persistence of antigens has been suggested to play a role in two opposing immunological phenomena: tolerance and memory. Therefore, we studied the impact of chimerism on alloreactive antibody (allo-Ab) production in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Thirty-five female renal transplant recipients of male donor organs were classified into the following groups: group 1, 13 sensitized uremic patients on dialysis; group 2, 5 nonsensitized uremic patients on dialysis; group 3, six sensitized patients experiencing graft rejection (3 acute vascular, 1 acute cellular, and 2 chronic); and group 4, 11 nonsensitized with functioning allografts (9 with good function, 1 with acute cellular rejection, and 1 with chronic rejection). Mean duration of dialysis after graft failure was similar in groups 1 (56+/-29.7 months) and 2 (41.8+/-42.4 months), as was dialysis efficiency. Chimerism was measured indirectly in the peripheral blood lymphocytes by polymerase chain reaction amplification of a specific Y chromosome DNA gene sequence with a detection sensitivity limit of 1 male cell per 1 million female cells. Allo-Ab production was measured by the PRA-STAT enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Sangstat) method.

RESULTS

Chimerism was observed in 60% of groups 1 and 2, 83% of group 3, and 82% of group 4. Among all groups, graft existence, irrespective of its function, positively predicted chimerism in 92% with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 78%. In group 3, all three patients with acute vascular rejection had chimerism and donor-specific allo-Abs. In group 4, eight of the nine patients with no rejection had chimerism.

CONCLUSION

Chimerism relates to persistence of allogeneic stimulus irrespective of its function. Chimerism did not confer protection against allo-Ab production or vascular rejection, and its existence was not crucial for sustenance of allo-Ab production.

Mutual tolerance after liver and not after heart transplantation? Evaluation of patient-anti-donor and donor-anti-patient responses by mixed lymphocyte culture

The ultimate goal in organ transplantation is the induction of donor-specific transplantation tolerance. The fact that in some patients it is possible to withdraw immunosuppressive therapy completely, suggests that immunological adaptation or donor-specific nonresponsiveness can occur following transplantation. In earlier studies we have shown that after blood transfusion, the mixed lymphocyte reactivity of the donor against patient peripheral blood mononuclear lymphocytes taken after blood transfusion gradually decreased with time. This may reflect the induction of an immunoregulatory mechanism, which protects the recipient against an immune reaction of the donor, enhancing a state of mixed chimerism. A similar phenomenon might also play a role in the immunological mechanism leading to transplantation tolerance. Therefore, we studied responses in patients with a well-functioning liver and heart transplant using a primed lymphocyte test (PLT) and a mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC). Two years after liver transplantation the PLT and MLC responses of patient against donor were decreased significantly compared to the situation before transplantation. The response of donor against patient was also lower two years after transplantation. The decreased responses were donor-specific since responses to third-party cells generally remained unchanged. In heart transplant recipients we could not detect a donor-specific downregulation. The reversed response, of donor against patient, was not different from responses of third-party against patient cells. Therefore, we conclude that donor-specific nonresponsiveness is not induced in patients with well-functioning heart transplants. In contrast, after a successful liver transplantation the response of patient against donor is decreased, as is the reversed response. It may be valuable to test whether in liver transplant patients withdrawing or reducing of maintenance immunosuppression is permitted for patients who appear to have developed two-way donor-specific hyporeactivity.

Serologic allogeneic chimerism

BACKGROUND

At least some transplanted livers secrete soluble human leukocyte antigens (sHLA) of donor phenotype into the body fluids of recipients. The individuals in whom this phenomenon occurs are by definition serologic allogeneic chimeras. Because an allogeneic transplanted liver may induce tolerance to itself and other organs in animals of the donor strain, and because maintenance of a soluble antigen in the circulation of any animal in sufficient quantity for a sufficient period generally leads to tolerance, this phenomenon may be biologically important. This study was performed to determine how common this phenomenon is and whether it occurs after transplantation of organs other than the liver.

METHODS

We studied 445 serum samples obtained from transplant recipients (liver, n=12; kidney, n=18; and heart, n=8) before and at various intervals after transplantation. All patients studied had allografts that had functioned for more than 1 year. We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to quantitate sHLA-A2 and sHLA-A1/A3/A11 (as a cross-reacting group). Donor and recipient combinations were selected in which measurable allotypes in donors were not present in recipients. In some instances, an additional allotype was present in a recipient but not in a donor.

RESULTS

All liver transplant recipients had detectable donor sHLA in their serum samples after transplantation. In 72% of kidney and 50% of heart transplant recipients, donor sHLA was found persistently in serum samples obtained after transplantation. Interestingly, all heart transplant recipients of HLA-A3, but none of HLA-A2, had detectable donor sHLA in their serum samples, a finding that may be due to technical reasons. High and stable serum concentrations of donor sHLA characterize long-term stable allograft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor sHLA is produced by all transplanted livers, most transplanted kidneys, and at least half of (but probably more) transplanted hearts. The hypothesis that donor sHLA may be tolerogenic to liver transplants can be expanded to include kidney and heart transplants.

Peripheral blood microchimerism in human liver and renal transplant recipients: rejection despite donor-specific chimerism

BACKGROUND

Development of donor-specific microchimerism (DSM) has been proposed as one of the possible mechanisms for induction and maintenance of allograft tolerance. The aim of this study was to determine: (1) the state of DSM in liver transplant (LTx) and renal transplant (RTx) recipients, (2) whether the persistent presence of an allograft is a requirement for maintenance of chimerism, and (3) whether donor-specific blood transfusions (DST) facilitate chimerism development in RTx recipients and whether this correlates with allograft function.

METHODS

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of DSM in peripheral blood of LTx and RTx recipients was assessed by polymerase chain reaction and competitive polymerase chain reaction using HLA-DR probes for mismatched antigens between the donor and recipient.

RESULTS

LTx recipients (11 of 12) who had or were having rejection were positive for DSM in circulation compared with 4 of 11 with normal allograft function (P<0.01). The number of donor cells did not correlate with allograft function. LTx recipients (4 of 4) who lost their first allograft and underwent retransplantation retained DSM for the first donors. RTx recipients who received DST (8 of 8) were positive for DSM compared with 6 of 12 of nontransfused recipients (P<0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that LTx and RTx recipients undergo rejection despite DSM. The development of DSM may not be a prerequisite for normal allograft function. Once DSM is established, the presence of the allograft is not required for maintenance of chimerism. DST facilitated the development of DSM in RTx recipients. Direct correlation was not observed between the development of DSM and allograft function in either DST or nontransfused RTx recipients.

Sequential measurement of peripheral blood allogeneic microchimerism levels and association with pulmonary function

We have shown in lung recipients that high levels of peripheral blood allogeneic microchimerism at 12 to 18 months posttransplant correlated with donor antigen-specific hyporeactivity (i.e., decreased proliferative response to donor antigen in MLC while response to 3rd-party cells remains unchanged); both parameters correlated with an obliterative bronchiolitis (OB)-free state. We have expanded these studies to determine any association of sequential microchimerism levels with concomitant clinical events. In this preliminary study of 7 lung recipients, we used limiting-dilution PCR to quantify peripheral blood microchimerism at serial timepoints ranging from 3 to >48 months posttransplant. These levels were compared with a variety of immunologic and clinical parameters: acute rejection, CMV infection, OB, donor antigen-specific hyporeactivity, and pulmonary function. Pulmonary function was measured per the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation: "current FEV1/ baseline FEV1" (FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second). Of the clinical parameters, the association between microchimerism and pulmonary function was the most striking. We observed dynamic patterns of peripheral microchimerism, which reflected the general rise and fall of FEV1. In all 7 recipients, chimerism and FEV1 were high very early posttransplant, then dropped at various rates and to various degrees. After its initial decline, microchimerism increased with FEV1 for the 1 hyporesponsive recipient; for the other 6 recipients, both values declined. These results illustrate, for the first time, that the fluctuation of peripheral blood microchimerism levels is associated with the recipient's clinical condition.

Status of microchimerism in recipients 15 years after living related kidney transplantation

To study the relevance of microchimerism to the long-term outcome of renal allografting, we analyzed the frequency of microchimerism in kidney transplant recipients who had stable graft function for 15 years or longer. Among the 104 recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1971 and 1980, 27 renal allografts (26%) are still functioning. Among these 27 patients, 13 recipients whose donor was still alive and cooperative were investigated for the presence of microchimerism in the peripheral blood and for their immunological status. Microchimerism was tested using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) method. To test the sensitivity of PCP-SSCP, the peripheral blood obtained within 5 weeks after transplantation (four kidney transplants, three liver transplants) was also examined. Microchimerism was detectable in five patients within 5 weeks of transplantation (kidney transplantation, 3/4; liver transplantation 2/3. However, in the patients studied 15 years after transplantation, microchimerism was detected in only one recipient (1/13). In this chimeric patient, mixed lymphocyte response revealed high responsiveness against donor antigen. In contrast, some patients who did not have chimerism showed donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in mixed lymphocyte response assay and did not develop antidonor antibody, according to flow cytometric analysis. Microchimerism is an infrequent state in the long-term survivors of kidney allografting, and this state is irrelevant to donor-specific unresponsiveness.

Effect of crossmatching on outcome in organ transplantation

The complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch and the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) are both used prospectively in renal transplantation, and their use is under evaluation in other types of major organ transplantation. The FCXM is the more sensitive method and better predicts outcome in second and subsequent renal allografts. Improved survival has unmasked the detrimental effect of a positive crossmatch on outcome in liver transplantation. Because of the urgent need of liver transplant candidates, it is unrealistic to defer transplantation until a crossmatch-negative donor is found; however, additional therapeutic measures may be taken to improve outcome for crossmatch-positive liver recipients. Some reports suggest that prospective crossmatching may improve outcome for sensitized heart recipients, and, additionally, recent studies have demonstrated that HLA compatibility between donor and recipient is an independent variable affecting survival after heart transplantation, prompting a reassessment of the current practice of transplanting hearts without consideration of the HLA match.