Novel potent and m2-selective antimuscarinic compounds which penetrate the blood-brain barrier

Dorsal motor vagal neurons can elicit bradycardia and reduce anxiety-like behavior

Cardiovagal neurons (CVNs) innervate cardiac ganglia through the vagus nerve to control cardiac function. Although the cardioinhibitory role of CVNs in nucleus ambiguus (CVNNA) is well established, the nature and functionality of CVNs in dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (CVNDMV) is less clear. We therefore aimed to characterize CVNDMV anatomically, physiologically, and functionally. Optogenetically activating cholinergic DMV neurons resulted in robust bradycardia through peripheral muscarinic (parasympathetic) and nicotinic (ganglionic) acetylcholine receptors, but not beta-1-adrenergic (sympathetic) receptors. Retrograde tracing from the cardiac fat pad labeled CVNNA and CVNDMV through the vagus nerve. Using whole-cell patch-clamp, CVNDMV demonstrated greater hyperexcitability and spontaneous action potential firing ex vivo despite similar resting membrane potentials, compared to CVNNA. Chemogenetically activating DMV also caused significant bradycardia with a correlated reduction in anxiety-like behavior. Thus, DMV contains uniquely hyperexcitable CVNs and is capable of cardioinhibition and robust anxiolysis.

Anti-invasive and anti-angiogenic activities of naturally occurring dibenzodiazepine BU-4664L and its derivatives

In the screening for antitumor leads from microbial secondary metabolites, BU-4664L (1), a naturally occurring dibenzodiazepine, was found to inhibit tumor invasion and angiogenesis in vitro. Compound 1 inhibited the gelatinase activities of MMP-2 and MMP-9 and the cellular motility. Four derivatives (2-5) were synthesized from 1 and their antitumor activities were evaluated. Compounds 3 and 4 exhibited potent anti-angiogenic effects on HUVEC, together with remarkable inhibition of cell migration at nanomolar concentrations, and showed much lower cytotoxicity.

In vitro and in vivo m2 muscarinic subtype selectivity of some dibenzodiazepinones and pyridobenzodiazepinones

Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves selective loss of muscarinic m2, but not m1, subtype receptors in cortical and hippocampal regions of the human brain. Emission tomographic study of the loss of m2 receptors in AD has been limited by the absence of available m2-selective radioligands, which can penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We now report on the in vitro and in vivo m2 muscarinic subtype selectivity of a series of dibenzodiazepinones and pyridobenzodiazepinones determined by competition studies against (R)-3-quinuclidinyl (S)-4-iodobenzilate ((R,S)-[125I]IQNB) or [3H]QNB. Of the compounds examined, three of the 5-[[4-[(4-dialkylamino)butyl]-1-piperidinyl]acetyl]-10, 11-dihydro-5-H-dibenzo[b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-ones (including DIBA) and three of the 11-[[4-[4-(dialkylamino)butyl]-1-phenyl]acetyl]-5, 11-dihydro-6H-pyrido [2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepin-6-ones (including PBID) exhibited both high binding affinity for the m2 subtype (</=5 nM) and high m2/m1 selectivity (>/=10). In vivo rat brain dissection studies of the competition of PBID or DIBD against (R,S)[125I]IQNB or [3H]QNB exhibited a dose-dependent preferential decrease in the binding of the radiotracer in brain regions that are enriched in the m2 muscarinic subtype. In vivo rat brain autoradiographic studies of the competition of PBID, BIBN 99, or DIBD against (R,S)[125I]IQNB exhibited an insignificant effect of BIBN 99 and confirmed the effect of PBID and DIBD in decreasing the binding of (R,S)[125I]IQNB in brain regions that are enriched in the m2 muscarinic subtype. We conclude that PBID and DIBD are potentially useful parent compounds from which in vivo m2 selective derivatives may be prepared for potential use in positron emission tomographic (PET) study of the loss of m2 receptors in AD.

Correction of the stereochemical assignment of the benzilic acid center in (R)-(-)-3-quinuclidinyl (S)-(+)-4-iodobenzilate [(R,S)-4-IQNB]

Radioiodinated (R)-quinuclidinyl-4-iodobenzilate (4IQNB) is a high affinity muscarinic antagonist which has been utilized for in vitro and in vivo assays, and for SPECT imaging in humans. 4IQNB exists in four different diastereomeric forms, since there are two asymmetric centers at the quinuclidinyl and benzilic acid centers. Based upon our in vivo studies, we have determined that the absolute stereochemistry previously assigned to the benzilic center was incorrect for the diastereomer that had been previously referred to as '(R)-quinuclidinyl-(R)-4-iodobenzilate' [(R,R)-4IQNB]. The correct designation for this diastereomer is '(R)-quinuclidinyl-(S)-4-iodobenzilate' [(R,S)-4IQNB].

In vivo autoradiography of radioiodinated (R)-3-quinuclidinyl (S)-4-iodobenzilate [(R, S)-IQNB] and (R)-3-quinuclidinyl (R)-4-iodobenzilate [(R,R)-IQNB]. Comparison of the radiolabelled products of a novel tributylstannyl precursor with those of the established triazene and exchange methods

Radioiodinated (R,S)-IQNB and (R,R)-IQNB are prepared either from a triazene precursor or using an exchange reaction. In both cases the radiochemical yield is low. The product of the exchange reaction also suffers from having a fairly low specific activity. A new method for preparing radioiodinated (R,S)-IQNB and (R,R)-IQNB from a tributylstannyl precursor has recently been developed. This method is more convenient and much faster than the triazene and exchange methods, and it reliably results in a high radiochemical yield of a high specific activity product. In rat brain, the in vivo properties of the radioiodinated products of the tributylstannyl method are identical to those of the corresponding radioiodinated (R,S)-IQNB and (R,R)-IQNB prepared using the triazene and exchange methods. Dissection studies of selected brain regions show that at 3 h post injection (R,S)-[125I]IQNB prepared by all three methods have indistinguishable % dose g-1 values in all brain regions studied. Autoradiographic comparison of coronal slices through the anteroventral nucleus of the thalamus, through the hippocampus and through the pons at 2 h post injection shows that (R,S)-[125I]IQNB prepared by the triazene and tributylstannyl methods have indistinguishable patterns of binding.

Specific binding component of the "inactive" stereoisomer (S,S)-[125I] IQNB to rat brain muscarinic receptors in vivo

In vivo nonspecific binding can be estimated using the inactive stereoisomer of a receptor radioligand. However, the binding of the inactive stereoisomer may be partially specific. Specific binding of the inactive (S,S)-[125I]IQNB was estimated from the inhibition induced by a competing nonradioactive ligand. This technique differed from the usual approach, since it was used to study the inactive rather than the active stereoisomer. The results indicate that there is substantial specific binding for (S,S)-[125I]IQNB.

Characterization of in vivo brain muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype selectivity by competition studies against (R,S)-[125I]IQNB

We have studied the in vivo rat brain muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) m2 subtype selectivities of three quinuclidine derivatives: (R)-3-quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB), E-(+,+)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-3-yl alpha-hydroxy-alpha-(1-iodo-1-propen-3-yl)-alpha-phenylacetate (E-(+,+)-IQNP), and E-(+,-)-1-azabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-3-yl alpha-hydroxy-alpha-(1-iodo-1-propen-3-yl)-alpha-phenylacetate (E-(+,-)-IQNP), and two tricyclic ring compounds: 5-[[4-[4-(diisobutylamino)butyl]-1-phenyl]-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenz o [b,e][1,4]diazepin-11-one [sequence: see text] (DIBD) and 11-[[4-[4-(diisobutylamino)butyl-1-phenyl]acetyl]-5,11-dihydro-6H- pyrido [2,3-b][1,4]benzodiazepin-6-one [sequence: see text] (PBID), by correlating the regional inhibition of (R,S)-[125I]IQNB with the regional composition of the m1-m4 subtypes. Subtle effects are demonstrated after reduction of the between-animal variability by normalization to corpus striatum. Substantial in vivo m2-selectivity is exhibited by QNB and DIBD, modest in vivo m2-selectivity is exhibited by E-(+,+)-IQNP, and little or no in vivo m2-selectivity is exhibited by PBID and E-(+,-)-IQNP. Surprisingly, the in vivo m2-selectivity is not correlated with the in vitro m2-selectivity. For example, QNB, which appears to be the most strongly in vivo m2-selective compound, exhibits negligible in vitro m2-selectivity. These examples indicate that a strategy which includes only preliminary in vitro screening may very well preclude the discovery of a novel compound which would prove useful in vivo.