Immune response to simultaneous administration of a recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine and multiple compulsory vaccines in infancy

Co-administration of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine with other adult vaccines: An overview

BACKGROUND

The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV; Shingrix®, GSK) is a subunit vaccine that has been approved for the prevention of herpes zoster in adults. Co-administration of two vaccines in a single visit is a strategy to improve overall vaccine coverage.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to consolidate available clinical data on RZV co-administration, providing an overview of safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity.

METHODS

RZV co-administration data were obtained from five randomised, open-label, phase III clinical trials with similar study designs. The co-administered vaccines included: quadrivalent seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4; NCT01954251), 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23; NCT02045836), reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap; NCT02052596), 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13; NCT03439657) and COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster (NCT05047770). Eligible participants were healthy adults aged ≥50 years.

RESULTS

A total of 3,974 participants were vaccinated (co-administration: 1,973; sequential: 2,001) across the five trials. Vaccine response rates to RZV were similar for co-administration (range: 95.8-99.1 %) and sequential groups (range: 95.1-99.1 %). Immune responses to RZV and the other vaccines (with the exception of pertactin) were non-inferior when the vaccines were co-administered compared with sequentially administered. Overall incidences of solicited local and general adverse events (AEs), unsolicited AEs, serious AEs or potential immune-mediated diseases were similar after co-administration or sequential administration. Myalgia was the most common solicited systemic AE (co-administration: 38-64 %; sequential: 30-59 %). Shivering and fever were more common after co-administration (16 % and 21 %, respectively) than after sequential administration (both 7 %) of RZV and PPSV23.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of RZV with routine vaccines does not significantly alter the reactogenicity, immunogenicity or safety of RZV or the co-administered vaccine. Healthcare practitioners should consider routine co-administration of RZV with other adult vaccines to improve vaccination coverage.

Vaccination and childhood epilepsies

INTRODUCTION

The evidence relating vaccination to febrile seizures and epilepsy is evaluated with an emphasis on febrile seizures (FS), Dravet syndrome (DS), West syndrome, and other developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.

METHODS

A systematic literature review using search words vaccination/immunization AND febrile seizures/epilepsy/Dravet/epileptic encephalopathy/developmental encephalopathy was performed. The role of vaccination as the cause/trigger/aggravation factor for FS or epilepsies and preventive measures were analyzed.

RESULTS

From 1428 results, 846 duplicates and 447 irrelevant articles were eliminated; 120 were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that vaccinations cause epilepsy in healthy populations. Vaccinations do not cause epileptic encephalopathies but may be non-specific triggers to seizures in underlying structural or genetic etiologies. The first seizure in DS may be earlier in vaccinated versus non-vaccinated patients, but developmental outcome is similar in both groups. Children with a personal or family history of FS or epilepsy should receive all routine vaccinations. This recommendation includes DS. The known risks of the infectious diseases prevented by immunization are well established. Vaccination should be deferred in case of acute illness. Acellular pertussis DTaP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) is recommended. The combination of certain vaccine types may increase the risk of febrile seizures however the public health benefit of separating immunizations has not been proven. Measles-containing vaccine should be administered at age 12-15 months. Routine prophylactic antipyretics are not indicated, as there is no evidence of decreased FS risk and they can attenuate the antibody response following vaccination. Prophylactic measures (preventive antipyretic medication) are recommended in DS due to the increased risk of prolonged seizures with fever.

Vaccines for immunoprevention of cancer

The immunoprevention of cancer and cancer recurrence is an important area of concern for the scientific community and society as a whole. Researchers have been working for decades to develop vaccines with the potential to alleviate these health care and economic burdens. So far, vaccines have made more progress in preventing cancer than in eliminating already established cancer. In particular, vaccines targeting oncogenic viruses, such as the human papillomavirus and the hepatitis B virus, are exceptional examples of successful prevention of virus-associated cancers, such as cervical cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer-preventive vaccines targeting nonviral antigens, such as tumor-associated antigens and neoantigens, are also being extensively tested. Here, we review the currently approved preventive cancer vaccines; discuss the challenges in this field by covering ongoing preclinical and clinical human trials in various cancers; and address various issues related to maximizing cancer vaccine benefit.

Hepatitis B vaccine development and implementation

Vaccination against hepatitis B is the most effective strategy to control HBV infection. The first licensed hepatitis B vaccine was developed by the purification of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) from plasma of asymptomatic HBsAg carriers. Then, the recombinant DNA technology enabled the development of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. A series of three doses vaccine can elicit long-term protection more than 30 y. Concurrent use of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and hepatitis B vaccine has substantially reduced the mother-to-child transmission of HBV, nearly zero infection in children of carrier mother with negative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and 5-10% infection in children of HBeAg-positive mothers. By the end of 2018, 189 countries adopted universal hepatitis B vaccination program, which has dramatically reduced the global prevalence of HBsAg in children <5 y of age, from 4.7% in the prevaccine era to 1.3% in 2015. However, the implementation of universal hepatitis B vaccination in some regions is suboptimal and timely birth dose vaccine is not routinely administered in more than half of newborn infants. Optimal worldwide universal hepatitis B vaccination requires more efforts to overcome the social and economic challenges.

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura risk by live, inactivated and simultaneous vaccinations among Japanese adults, children and infants: a matched case-control study

This case–control study investigated immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) risk following live, inactivated, and simultaneous vaccination, with a focus on infants aged < 2 years. We matched case patients with ITP to one or two control patients with other diseases by institution, hospital visit timing, sex, and age. We calculated McNemar’s pairwise odds ratios (ORs [95% confidence interval]) with 114 case–control pairs. The case group had 27 (44%) males and 22 (35%) infants, and the control group included 49 (43%) males and 42 (37%) infants. For all age groups, the McNemar’s OR for ITP occurrence was 1.80 (0.54–6.84, p = 0.64) for all vaccines. Among infants, these were 1.50 (0.17–18.0, p = 0.50) for all vaccines, 2.00 (0.29–22.1, p = 0.67) for live vaccines, and 1.00 (0.01–78.5, p = 0.50) for inactivated vaccines. Sex-adjusted common ORs for simultaneous vaccination were 1.52 (0.45–5.21, p = 0.71) for all vaccines, 1.83 (0.44–7.59, p = 0.40) for inactivated vaccines only, and 1.36 (0.29–6.30, p = 0.69) for mixed live and inactivated vaccines. In infants, these were 1.95 (0.44–8.72, p = 0.38), 1.41 (0.29–6.94, p = 0.67) and 2.85 (0.43–18.9, p = 0.28), respectively. These limited data suggest no significant ITP risk following vaccinations or simultaneous vaccination in any age group, including infants.

Co-administration of vaccines: a focus on tetravalent Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella (MMRV) and meningococcal C conjugate vaccines

Simultaneous administration of different vaccines is a strategy to increase the possibility to receive vaccines at appropriate age, safely and effectively, reducing the number of sessions and allowing a more acceptable integration of new vaccines into National Immunization Programs (NIPs). Co-administration can be performed when there are specific indications in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) of the vaccines; but, in absence of these indications, the practice is possible if there are no specific contraindications nor scientific evidence to discourage simultaneous administration.

The aim of this work is to review the safety and efficacy of co-administration of the tetravalent measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (MMRV) and the meningococcal C (Men C) conjugate vaccines after 12 months of age.

Several studies demonstrated that MMRV and Men C conjugate vaccines can be administered concomitantly without a negative impact on the safety and immunogenicity of either vaccines, inducing highly immunogenic responses.

Evaluation of potentially achievable vaccination coverage of the second dose of measles containing vaccine with simultaneous administration and risk factors for missed opportunities among children in Zhejiang province, east China

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the potential achievable coverage of the second dose of measles containing vaccine (MCV2) when the protocol of simultaneous administration of childhood vaccines was fully implemented. Risk factors for missed opportunity (MO) for simultaneous administration of MCV2 were also investigated.

METHODS

Children born from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2014 and registered in Zhejiang provincial immunization information system were enrolled in this study. The MO of simultaneous administration of MCV2, the actual age-appropriate coverage (AAC) of MCV2 and the potentially achievable coverage (PAC) of MCV2 were evaluated and compared across different birth cohorts, by different socio-demographic variables. For the 2014 birth cohort, logistic regression model was used to detect the risk factors of MOs, from both socio-demographic and vaccination service providing aspects.

RESULTS

Compared to the AAC, the PAC of MCV2 increased significantly from 2005 birth cohort to 2014 birth cohort (p<0.001), with a median of 12.7 percentage points. Higher birth order of children, resident children, higher maternal education background, higher socio-economic development level of resident areas, less frequent vaccination service, and shorter vaccination service time were significant risk factors of MO for simultaneous administration of MCV2, with all p-value < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

The findings in this study suggest that fully utilization of all opportunities for simultaneous administration of all age-eligible vaccine doses at the same vaccination visit is critical for achieving the coverage target of 95% for MCV2. Future interventions focusing on the group with risk factors observed could substantially eliminate MOs for simultaneous administration of MCV2, further to improve the coverage of fully immunization of MCV, and finally achieve the goal of eliminating measles.

The serological response against foot and mouth disease virus elicited by repeated vaccination of dairy cattle

In Israel, cattle are annually vaccinated against foot and mouth disease (FMD). If infections with FMD virus occur in dairy farms it mainly involves heifers and calves, while older dairy cows seldom become infected. We hypothesized that this difference in susceptibility between adult cows and the young heifers and calves is due to stronger and more stable immune response elicited by multiple vaccinations. In order to test this hypothesis, 99 dairy cattle, divided into six groups according to number of prior vaccinations, were annually vaccinated with a trivalent vaccine (A, O and Asia-1) and followed during two consecutive years. In total 988 sera were sampled at 11 time points. Virus neutralization tests (VNT) were performed in order to determine the neutralizing antibody titers (NAT) against the vaccine homologous serotypes: O-4625, O-Manisa, Asia-1-Shamir and the heterologous serotype A-Turkey-20/2006. A similar NAT pattern was observed to all serotypes and therefore statistical analysis was restricted to O-4625 serotype. In the 'high vaccination' groups (cows that were vaccinated at least four times before the study), high NAT were found on the beginning of the trial and no or only a mild increase of NAT was observed following further vaccinations. Additionally, in the 'high vaccination' groups, the percentage of cows that had a NAT higher than 2.0 (log10) by the end of the 1st year was significantly higher than in the 'low vaccination' groups (cows vaccinated only three times or less before the study). We conclude that starting from the 5th vaccination, the NAT increase following vaccination is mild and NAT are persistent, suggesting reduction of the frequency of routine vaccination after multiple vaccinations is possible.

Reprint of: Factors associated with effectiveness of the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine in China: 1992-2005

BACKGROUND

In China, the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection was high because of perinatal and early childhood transmission. A three-dose hepatitis B vaccine schedule with a first dose as soon as possible after birth was introduced in 1992 and generalized in 2002 in the Expanded Programme of Immunization (EPI). In 2006, a serological survey evaluated the effectiveness of vaccination.

METHODS

We conducted a restricted analysis of the national serological survey that sampled children and collected information on demographic characteristics, birth history, hepatitis B vaccination and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) status as determined by ELISA testing. We compared children who received the first dose in a timely way (i.e., within 24h of birth) with others in terms of HBsAg status, stratified by birth cohort and place of birth.

RESULTS

Three-dose hepatitis B vaccine coverage increased from 60.8% for children born in 1992-1997 to 93.2% for children born in 2002-2005. Meanwhile, timely birth dose coverage increased from 38.7% to 74.4%. Among 29,410 children born in 1992-2005 who had received three vaccine doses and no hepatitis B immune globulin, factors associated with being HBsAg-negative in multivariate analysis included receiving a timely birth dose (p=0.04), birth after 1998 (p<0.001), living in an urban setting (p=0.008) and hospital birth (p=0.001). The relative prevalence of HBsAg among children receiving the timely birth dose was lower for children born in county or larger hospitals (0.39), intermediate in township hospitals (0.73) and highest at home (0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital birth and receiving a timely birth dose are the main determinants of the field effectiveness of the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Efforts to increase the proportion of hospital deliveries are key to increasing timely birth dose coverage and its effectiveness.

Factors associated with effectiveness of the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine in China: 1992-2005

BACKGROUND

In China, the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection was high because of perinatal and early childhood transmission. A three-dose hepatitis B vaccine schedule with a first dose as soon as possible after birth was introduced in 1992 and generalized in 2002 in the Expanded Programme of Immunization (EPI). In 2006, a serological survey evaluated the effectiveness of vaccination.

METHODS

We conducted a restricted analysis of the national serological survey that sampled children and collected information on demographic characteristics, birth history, hepatitis B vaccination and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) status as determined by ELISA testing. We compared children who received the first dose in a timely way (i.e., within 24h of birth) with others in terms of HBsAg status, stratified by birth cohort and place of birth.

RESULTS

Three-dose hepatitis B vaccine coverage increased from 60.8% for children born in 1992-1997 to 93.2% for children born in 2002-2005. Meanwhile, timely birth dose coverage increased from 38.7% to 74.4%. Among 29,410 children born in 1992-2005 who had received three vaccine doses and no hepatitis B immune globulin, factors associated with being HBsAg-negative in multivariate analysis included receiving a timely birth dose (p=0.04), birth after 1998 (p<0.001), living in an urban setting (p=0.008) and hospital birth (p=0.001). The relative prevalence of HBsAg among children receiving the timely birth dose was lower for children born in county or larger hospitals (0.39), intermediate in township hospitals (0.73) and highest at home (0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital birth and receiving a timely birth dose are the main determinants of the field effectiveness of the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine. Efforts to increase the proportion of hospital deliveries are key to increasing timely birth dose coverage and its effectiveness.

Hepatitis B immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis B or with unknown exposure status

BACKGROUND

The benefits and harms of hepatitis B vaccination in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis B infection or with unknown exposure status have not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of hepatitis B vaccination in people not previously exposed to hepatitis B infection or with unknown exposure status.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified from The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS,Science Citation Index Expanded (last search, March 2007). Additionally, we contacted experts and vaccine manufacturers, and read through reference lists for eligible trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing hepatitis B vaccine versus placebo, no intervention, or another vaccine in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis B (HBsAg negative) or with unknown exposure status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was hepatitis B infection (detecting HBsAg, HBeAg, HBV DNA, or anti-HBc). Secondary outcomes were lack of sero-protection, antibody titre, clinical complications, adverse events, lack of compliance, and cost-effectiveness. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using intention-to-treat analysis assuming an unfavourable event for missing data. Sensitivity analyses based on methodological quality (risk of bias), available data analysis, intention-to-treat analysis assuming a favourable event for missing data, best-case scenario, and worst-case scenario were conducted.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials were eligible. All had high risk of bias and reporting was inconsistent. Hepatitis B vaccine did not show a clear effect on the risk of developing HBsAg (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03, 4 trials, 1230 participants) and anti-HBc (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.07; 4 trials, 1230 participants, random-effects) when data were analysed using intention-to-treat analysis assuming an unfavourable event for missing data. Analysis based on data of available participants showed reduced risk of developing HBsAg (RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.44, 4 trials, 576 participants) and anti-HBc (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.76, 4 trials, 576 participants, random-effects). Intention-to-treat analysis assuming favourable outcome for missing data showed similar reduction in risk. Hepatitis B vaccination had an unclear effect on the risk of lacking protective antibody levels (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.27, 3 trials, 1210 participants, random-effects). Development of adverse events was sparsely reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people not previously exposed to hepatitis B, vaccination has unclear effect on the risk of developing infection, as compared to no vaccination. The risk of lacking protective antibody levels as well as serious and non-serious adverse events appear comparable among recipients and non-recipients of hepatitis B vaccine.

Hepatitis B vaccine in the EPI schedule

OBJECTIVE

This study was carried out to evaluate the adequacy of seroconversion when Hepatitis B vaccine is given along with other vaccines at 0, 6 weeks (along with DPT and OPV) and at 9 months (along with measles).

METHODS

725 infants born to apparently healthy mothers were enrolled to receive the hepatitis B vaccine at 0, 6 weeks and 9 months (Group A) or at 0, 1 and 6 months as per WHO schedule--(Group B). Baseline HbsAg testing was carried out and the babies were immunized with the first dose of hepatitis B vaccine within 48 hours of birth. BCG and the other EPI vaccines were given as per schedule. Serum samples were collected 4 weeks after the second and the third immunizations. 604 infants (83.3%) completed the study. The testing for HbsAg and Anti Hbs titers were conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi utilizing standard ELISA kits.

RESULTS

The seroconversion rates 4 weeks after the second dose of the vaccine were 90.89% (GMT = 48.23) and 91.82% (GMT = 43.95) (P=0.8) in Group A and Group B respectively. After 4 weeks of the third dose the seroconversion rates were 98.99 (GMT = 161.12) and 98.45 (GMT = 150.12) (p=0.17) in Group A and Group B respectively. The two schedules were comparable on using the Kruskal-Wallis H method for analysis.

CONCLUSION

The schedule of hepatitis B vaccination at 0, 6 weeks and 9 months has the same seroefficacy as the currently recommended schedule of 0, 1 and 6 months.

Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B): a review of its immunogenicity and protective efficacy against hepatitis B

Engerix-B (Hep-B[Eng]) is a noninfectious recombinant DNA vaccine containing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). It is produced from genetically engineered yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Intramuscular Hep-B(Eng) [0-, 1-, 6-month schedule] has excellent immunogenicity in healthy neonates and infants, children, adolescents and adults, with seroprotection rates of 85-100% seen approximate, equals 1 month after the final dose of vaccine; seroprotection was defined as an antibody against HBsAg (anti-HBs) titre of > or =10 IU/L. The use of alternative Hep-B(Eng) immunisation schedules (e.g. a 0-, 1-, 2-, 12-month schedule in neonates and infants, 0-, 12-, 24-month or two-dose schedules in children and adolescents, and accelerated schedules in adults) have also been associated with high rates of seroprotection. Seroprotection rates were generally similar with Hep-B(Eng) and the recombinant vaccine Recombivax HB (Hep-B[Rax]) or plasma-derived vaccines (PDVs) approximate, equals 1 month after the final dose (although anti-HBs geometric mean titres were significantly higher with Hep-B[Eng] than with Hep-B[Rax]). One month after the final dose, adults had significantly higher seroprotection rates with the recombinant triple-antigen vaccine Bio-Hep-B (Hep-B[Bio]) than with Hep-B(Eng), although seroprotection rates in healthy infants were similar with Hep-B(Eng) and Hep-B(Bio). Hep-B(Eng) had excellent immunogenicity in several groups considered at high risk of acquiring hepatitis B (e.g. neonates born to hepatitis B carrier mothers and healthcare workers). The immunogenicity of Hep-B(Eng) was reduced in patients with conditions associated with impaired immune function (e.g. patients undergoing haemodialysis or being treated for malignancy), although it had good immunogenicity in patients with diabetes mellitus.Hep-B(Eng) had excellent protective efficacy against HBsAg carriage in healthy infants and children, and in neonates born to hepatitis B carrier mothers (protective efficacy of 95-99%). Hep-B(Eng) also demonstrated good protective efficacy in a number of other high-risk groups. Hep-B(Eng) is generally well tolerated with a tolerability profile similar to that of Hep-B(Rax), Hep-B(Bio) and PDVs. In conclusion, Hep-B(Eng) is a well established, highly immunogenic hepatitis B vaccine with good tolerability and excellent protective efficacy; it offers flexibility through a variety of immunisation schedules. In addition, it appears that Hep-B(Eng) confers immunity for at least 10 years. Hep-B(Eng) has an important role in mass vaccination campaigns against hepatitis B, as well as in groups considered at high risk of acquiring hepatitis B.

The overall safety profile of currently available vaccines directed against infectious diseases

The vaccines currently used worldwide for the prevention of infectious diseases are quite safe in comparison to most pharmaceutical and biological agents. Vaccine components may contribute to inflammatory, allergic or anaphylactic reactions. Most adverse events are transient and well-tolerated. Transient severe adverse reactions occur at rates of one in one thousand vaccinations; permanent severe adverse reactions occur on the order of one in one million. The most common of the severe adverse reactions are syncope and allergic reactions. Providers can take steps to prevent or ameliorate these reactions by pursuing both prelicensure testing (albeit limited) and postlicensure testing and monitoring. Systems that enhance the detection of safety concerns include national passive and active surveillance as well as regional vaccine registries and provider-based patient education. Since vaccines are used in universal programmes, their safety is paramount to their continued acceptance. Healthcare managers, including administrators of hospitals, clinics, practice groups, health maintenance organisations (HMOs) and managed care plans, can and should support providers in minimising adverse events associated with vaccines by supporting postvaccination observation policies, postlicensure testing and surveillance, vaccine registries and patient education systems.

Addressing parents' concerns: do multiple vaccines overwhelm or weaken the infant's immune system?

Recent surveys found that an increasing number of parents are concerned that infants receive too many vaccines. Implicit in this concern is that the infant's immune system is inadequately developed to handle vaccines safely or that multiple vaccines may overwhelm the immune system. In this review, we will examine the following: 1) the ontogeny of the active immune response and the ability of neonates and young infants to respond to vaccines; 2) the theoretic capacity of an infant's immune system; 3) data that demonstrate that mild or moderate illness does not interfere with an infant's ability to generate protective immune responses to vaccines; 4) how infants respond to vaccines given in combination compared with the same vaccines given separately; 5) data showing that vaccinated children are not more likely to develop infections with other pathogens than unvaccinated children; and 6) the fact that infants actually encounter fewer antigens in vaccines today than they did 40 or 100 years ago.

Persistence of anti-HBs 5 years after the introduction of routine infant and adolescent vaccination in Italy

A population survey was conducted to assess the duration of anti-HBs levels > 10 IU/l in vaccinees living in Lazio Region (Italy) 5 years after the introduction (15 June 1991) of compulsory vaccination of new-borns and 11-year-old children. A random sample of 1192 (533 children born in 1991--92 and 659 adolescents born in 1979--81) was selected. In 92.9% of children and 94.1% of adolescents anti-HBs titres were protective (> or = 10 IU/l). These subjects with protective titres were divided into three categories: low responders (anti-HBs titres = 10--500 IU/l), medium responders (anti-HBs titres = 501--2000 IU/l) and high responders (anti-HBs titres > 2000 IU/l). Factors associated with the level of response were analysed, using a multiple politomic logistic regression analysis. Greater age at first dose (11--12 years) was associated with higher titres (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.4--3.2 for medium responders and OR = 3.0, 95% CI = 1.9--4.8 for high responders). Simultaneous administration of DT vaccine was associated with lower titres (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8 for medium responders and OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1--0.7 for high responders).

Controlled trial of immune response of preterm infants to recombinant hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccines administered simultaneously shortly after birth

AIM

The study was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity of an early, extra dose of enhanced inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) administered simultaneously with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) to preterm infants shortly after birth.

METHODS

Three groups were studied. Fifty preterm infants received IPV intramuscularly within 24 hours of birth, in addition to routine recommended childhood immunisations. Fifty two preterm infants and 35 full term infants received routine immunisations only (routine vaccination timing: HBV at birth, 1 and 6 months of age; IPV at 2 and 4 months; oral polio vaccine (OPV) at 4 and 6 months; diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) at 2, 4, and 6 months; and Haemophilus influenzae B vaccine at 2 and 4 months). Blood samples were taken at birth, 3 and 7 months of age from all infants, and at 1 month of age from preterm infants only.

RESULTS

At birth, a lower percentage of both study and control preterm infants had antipoliovirus type 3 titres >/= 1:8 than full term infants. At 1 and 3 months of age significantly more early IPV infants had antipoliovirus type 3 titres >/= 1:8 than routinely vaccinated preterm infants (p < 0.05). At 7 months of age there were no significant differences in percentage of antipoliovirus titres >/= 1:8 or geometric mean times (GMTs) between the early IPV group and the routinely vaccinated preterm group. At 3 and 7 months of age, the percentage of positive antihepatitis B titres (>/= 1:10) and the GMT of the early IPV preterm group did not differ significantly from those of preterm controls. There was no significant difference in percentage of positive antihepatitis B titres between the early IPV group and full term controls at any time. GMTs for hepatitis B antibodies were significantly lower in the early IPV preterm group than in full term controls at 3 and 7 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of an additional dose of IPV simultaneously with routine HBV to preterm infants shortly after birth provides early protection from poliovirus and hepatitis B infection, and does not interfere with poliovirus antibody production at the age of 7 months.

Safety and immunogenicity of a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B vaccine administered according to two different primary vaccination schedules. Multicenter Working Group

The reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a tetravalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B (DTPa-HB) vaccine (SmithKline Beecham) were studied in 565 infants immunized according to one of two different schedules, at 2, 4 and 6 months of age (group A n = 208) or at 3, 5 and 11 months of age (group B n = 357). The incidences of local and general reactions within the first 8 days after vaccination were similar in the two groups of infants, the vast majority being mild in intensity and occurring within 2-3 days of vaccine administration. Severe local symptoms were rare: pain after 0.6% of all doses, redness after 0.5% and 1.3%, and swelling after 0.3% and 1.5%, in group A and B, respectively. Only one infant in group A and one in group B had a temperature > 39.0 degrees C. Both schedules proved satisfactory in obtaining high levels of antibodies against all antigens. The rates of serologic response against the different antigens reached 100% in both groups. Antibody titres against all vaccine components were elevated following both schedules, but after the third dose of vaccine geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) against D toxoid, filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin (PRN) and hepatitis B (HB) were significantly higher in the 3, 5, 11 group than after the 2, 4, 6 schedule. Antibody titres measured at 7 months of age in the group immunized at 2, 4 and 6 months were higher than those reached at 6 months of age in infants immunized at 3, 5 and 11 months, but FHA and PRN were within the range of DTPa vaccine with proven efficacy. We conclude that DTPa-HB vaccine was safe, well tolerated and highly immunogenic. Both vaccination schedules (2, 4, 6 and 3, 5, 11) can be considered suitable for mass immunization programmes.

Long-term antibody persistence after booster vaccination with combined tetravalent diphtheria tetanus, whole-cell Bordetella pertussis and hepatitis B vaccine in healthy infants

Combining HB vaccine with routine paediatric vaccines has been recognized as the best means of universal vaccination against hepatitis B. Our objective was to evaluate the long-term antibody persistence of such a combined vaccine in an area of high hepatitis B endemicity. We have shown that a DTPw-HB vaccine was safe and immunogenic when given as a booster dose at 18 months of age. One month after the booster dose of DTPw-HB vaccine, at least 97.8% of subjects had seroprotective anti-HBsAg levels, and 1 year later at least 93.9% of these subjects remained seroprotected against HBsAg. Immune responses to the DTPw components were similar or greater than those of the commercial DTPw vaccine given to the control group. This DTPw-HB vaccine, which showed good long-term anti-HBsAg antibody persistence, could advantageously replace separate DTPw and HB vaccines in areas of high hepatitis B endemicity in terms of clinical, economic and strategic benefits.

Hepatitis B component does not interfere with the immune response to diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell Bordetella pertussis components of a quadrivalent (DTPw-HB) vaccine: a controlled trial in healthy infants

The aim of this single-blind, parallel trial was to assess whether the hepatitis B (HB) component of a DTPw-HB vaccine interferes with the immune response to the other three components when administered at 3, 5 and 7 months of age. One hundred and six infants were randomized to receive three doses of DTPw or DTPw-HB vaccines. Seroprotection (or seroresponse) rates and geometric mean titers (GMT) of antibodies were assessed 3-6 weeks after the third dose. Anti-diphtheria, anti-tetanus and anti-Bordetella pertussis antibodies were measured by ELISA and anti-HBs by radioimmunoassay. Local and general signs and symptoms were recorded for a 4-day follow-up period after each vaccination. After the full vaccination course all subjects in both groups had seroprotective titers (> or = 0.1 IU ml-1) against diphtheria and tetanus and seroresponded (titers > or = 15 EL.U ml-1) to B. pertussis, and there was no significant difference between groups in relation to GMT. All subjects vaccinated with DTPw-HB had seroprotective levels (> or = 10 mIU ml-1) of anti-HBs antibodies after the third dose (GMT of 2318 mIU ml-1). Overall there were no significant differences between groups in relation to the incidence of local and general symptoms. These results show that the HB component did not interfere with the immune response to the other three components of the vaccine.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine administered to infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. The Kaiser-UCLA Vaccine Study Group

A recombinant hepatitis B vaccine was administered to over 5000 infants in a prospective, randomized and blinded study. Infants were given either recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 10 micrograms dose-1) or a Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age simultaneously with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and oral polio vaccines. Adverse reactions were ascertained by parental reports and interviews, and review of medical records. Blood specimens collected from 269 infants given hepatitis B vaccine were assayed for antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) by enzyme immunoassay. Infants given hepatitis B vaccine experienced low rates of adverse reactions that were similar or lower than the rates in infants given Hib conjugate vaccine. The geometric mean anti-HBs concentrations were 9.6 mIU ml-1 after one dose, 333 mIU ml-1 after two doses and 1812 mIU ml-1 after three doses (99% had levels > or = 10 mIU ml-1). Antibody responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids were unaffected by simultaneous administration of hepatitis B or Hib conjugate vaccine. Engerix-B vaccine was safe and immunogenic when given with other routine childhood immunizations at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, and should provide long-term protection against hepatitis B virus infection.

Duration of hepatitis B antibody response in children immunised with hepatitis B and compulsory vaccines

Twenty four subjects were simultaneously administered DT toxoids, OPV and HBV vaccines at the age of 3, 4-5 and 11 months and then followed up for 2 and 4 years in order to evaluate the duration of the immune response and the need and the timing of HBV revaccination. A fall in anti-HBs titre below 10 mIU/ml was observed at the follow up in 4/24 (16.7%) of the subjects. In other 5 children (20.8%) anti-HBs titre was found to be just above 10 mIU/ml. This would suggest that a revaccination is indicated and it could be performed at the age of 5-6 years when children enter school. This schedule is simple, effective and money saving since it reduces the cost/benefit ratio and the number of visits for immunisations, and it is expected to improve the compliance for the vaccination.

Immunogenicity of 20 micrograms of recombinant DNA hepatitis B vaccine in healthy neonates: a comparison of three different vaccination schemes

The immunogenicity of a full dose (20 micrograms) of recombinant DNA yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine (Engerix-B) was assessed in healthy neonates in order to compare three candidate vaccination schemes. After randomization 162 newborns of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative mothers entered the study. Neonates received hepatitis B vaccine according to a four-dose vaccination scheme starting either at month 3 (scheme I: months 3, 4, 5, and 11) or at birth (scheme III: months 0, 1, 2, and 11). Another group of neonates received hepatitis B vaccine according to a three-dose scheme starting at birth (scheme II: months 0, 1, and 6). Serious adverse reactions were not observed; 2.5% of the vaccinated newborns suffered mild transient local symptoms. The vaccine was highly immunogenic irrespective of vaccination scheme; all infants developed anti-HBs levels > or = 10 IU/L, 97% > or = 100 IU/L. The immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine after primary and booster vaccinations, administered in the four-dose scheme started at birth, was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in the three-dose scheme started at birth. Hepatitis B vaccination according to the four-dose scheme started at month 3 produced significantly higher (P < 0.05) antibody levels in comparison to the four-dose scheme started directly after birth. This study showed that a four-dose hepatitis B vaccination scheme starting at month 3 resulted in the highest antibody levels of the three schemes investigated and can be recommended for incorporation in the Expanded Programme on Immunization in The Netherlands.