Apolipoprotein(a) isoform size influences binding of lipoprotein(a) to plasmin-modified des-AA-fibrinogen

Epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic implications of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease is associated with a tremendously increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, however, show a diminished predictive power in these patients compared with the general population. This review provides an overview of lipoprotein(a), which is considered a nontraditional risk factor. The characteristic genetic and nongenetic changes of lipoprotein(a) in kidney disease are discussed and set into the context of risk prediction. In particular, genetically determined apolipoprotein(a) polymorphism is a powerful risk predictor for cardiovascular disease and total mortality in these patients. Finally, the limited interventional strategies available to lower lipoprotein(a) are considered.

High lipoprotein(a) levels and small apolipoprotein(a) sizes are associated with endothelial dysfunction in a multiethnic cohort

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the effect of lipoprotein(a), or Lp(a), levels and apolipoprotein(a), or apo(a), sizes on endothelial function and to explore ethnic differences in their effects.

BACKGROUND

Although high levels of Lp(a) have been shown to confer increased cardiovascular risk in Caucasians, its significance in non-Caucasian populations is uncertain. The pathogenic role of the apo(a) component of Lp(a) is also unclear.

METHODS

The relationship of Lp(a) levels and apo(a) sizes to endothelial function was examined in a multiethnic cohort of 89 healthy subjects (age 42 +/- 9 years; 50 men, 39 women) free of other cardiac risk factors. Endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and endothelium-independent, nitrate-induced dilation (NTG) were assessed by ultrasound imaging of the brachial artery.

RESULTS

Plasma Lp(a) levels were lowest in Caucasians (18.3 +/- 21.1 mg/dl, n = 40); intermediate in Hispanics (30.2 +/- 30.5 mg/dl, n = 21); and highest in African Americans (68.8 +/- 46.0 mg/dl, n = 28). Lipoprotein(a) levels were found to correlate inversely to FMD (r = -0.33, p < 0.005) but not to NTG (r = 0.06, p = 0.60). This association remained significant after adjusting for gender (p = 0.002). In addition, subjects with small apo(a) size of <or=22 kringle 4 repeats had significantly lower FMD than those with large apo(a) (2.23 +/- 2.37% vs. 6.26 +/- 4.29%, p < 0.0001), irrespective of Lp(a) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support an independent role of Lp(a) in atherogenesis, an effect that is particularly evident in African Americans. The proatherogenic property of Lp(a) can be attributed in part to its apo(a) component.

Impact of apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes on long-term renal transplant survival

The long-term success of renal transplantation is limited because of chronic rejection (CR), which shows histologic parallels to atherosclerosis. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, but its role in CR has not been investigated. Plasma levels of Lp(a) are determined mainly by the inherited isoform (phenotype) of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] and show an inverse correlation with the molecular weight of apo(a). Apo(a) isoforms were identified in frozen sera of 327 patients who received a renal transplant during 1982 to 1992. Long-term graft survival in recipients with high molecular weight (HMW) or low molecular weight (LMW) apo(a) phenotypes were compared retrospectively. Mean (95% confidence interval) transplant survival was 12.8 yr (range, 11.9 to 13.6 yr) in patients with HMW and 11.9 yr (range, 10.8 to 13.1 yr) in patients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes (P = 0.2065). In patients who were 35 yr or younger at the time of transplantation, mean transplant survival was more than 3 yr longer in recipients with HMW apo(a) phenotypes compared with those with LMW apo(a) phenotypes (13.2 yr [range, 12.1 to 14.4 yr] versus 9.9 yr (range, 8.5 to 11.5 yr); P = 0.0156). In a Cox's proportional hazards regression model, the presence of LMW phenotypes-but not gender, immunosuppression, or HLA mismatches-in young patients was associated with a statistically significant risk of CR (P = 0.0434). These retrospective data indicate that young renal transplant recipients with LMW apo(a) phenotypes have a significantly shorter long-term graft survival, regardless of the number of HLA mismatches, gender, or immunosuppressive treatment.

Relationship between lipoprotein(a) phenotypes and plaminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in diabetic patients

It has been demonstrated in vitro that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] increases the endothelial synthesis of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1). However, this effect in vivo is controversial, and the possible relationship between PAI-1 and Lp(a) phenotypes has not been evaluated. The aim of the study was to determine the influence of Lp(a) and its phenotypes on PAI-1 serum concentrations in diabetic patients. For this purpose we include 75 Caucasian diabetic patients (34 consecutive type I and 41 consecutive type II) without late diabetic complications. Lp(a) and PAI-1 were assessed by ELISA. Lp(a) phenotypes were determined by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting, and grouped according to size in small (F,B,S1,S2), big (S3,S4), and null. A linear correlation between Lp(a) and PAI-1 was not observed either as a whole or when type I and type II diabetic patients were analyzed separately. However, significant differences were detected in PAI-1 levels when Lp(a) phenotypes were considered (small: 42.1+/-31.8 ng/mL; big: 37.2+/-26.1 ng/mL; null: 14.4+/-14.4; p< 0.05). The significant differences were due to the low PAI-1 concentrations observed in patients with null phenotype. Our results suggest that fibrinolytic activity might be preserved in diabetic patients with null Lp(a) phenotype. Furthermore, it could be speculated that diabetic patients with null phenotype should be considered at low risk to develop cardiovascular disease.

Characterization of the interaction of recombinant apolipoprotein(a) with modified fibrinogen surfaces and fibrin clots

Elevated levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in plasma are a significant risk factor for the development of atherosclerotic disease, a property which may arise from the ability of this lipoprotein to inhibit fibrinolysis. In the present study we have quantitated the binding of recombinant forms of apolipoprotein(a) [17K and 12K r-apo(a); containing 8 and 3 copies, respectively, of the major repeat kringle sequence (kringle IV type 2)] to modified fibrinogen surfaces. Iodinated 17K and 12K r-apo(a) bound to immobilized thrombin-modified fibrinogen (i.e., fibrin) surfaces with similar affinities (Kd~ 1.2 - 1.6 µM). The total concentration of binding sites (Bmax) present on the fibrin surface was ~4-fold greater for the 12K than for the 17K (Bmaxvalues of 0.81 ± 0.09 nM, and 0.20 ± 0.01 nM respectively), suggesting that the total binding capacity on fibrin surfaces is reduced for larger apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) species. Interestingly, binding of apo(a) to intact fibrin was not detected as assessed by measurement of intrinsic fluorescence of free apo(a) present in the supernatants of sedimented fibrin clots. In other experiments, the total concentration apo(a) binding sites available on plasmin-modified fibrinogen surfaces was shown to be 13.5-fold higher than the number of sites available on unmodified fibrin surfaces (Bmaxvalues of 2.7 ± 0.3 nM and 0.20 ± 0.01 nM respectively) while the affinity of apo(a) for these surfaces was similar. The increase in Bmaxwas correlated with plasmin-mediated exposure of C-terminal lysines since treatment of plasmin-modified fibrinogen surfaces with carboxypeptidase B produced a significant decrease in total binding signal as detected by ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay). Taken together, these data suggest that apo(a) binds to fibrin with poor affinity (low µM) and that the total concentration of apo(a) binding sites available on modified-fibrinogen surfaces is affected by both apo(a) isoform size and by the increased availability of C-terminal lysines on plasmin-degraded fibrinogen surfaces. However, the low affinity of apo(a) for fibrin indicates that Lp(a) may inhibit fibrinolysis through a mechanism distinct from binding to fibrin, such as binding to plasminogen.Key words: fibrinolysis, lipoprotein(a), plasminogen activation.

Role of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotype in atherogenesis: prospective results from the Bruneck study

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies have suggested both atherogenic and thrombogenic properties of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], depending on Lp(a) plasma concentrations and varying antifibrinolytic capacity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoforms. Epidemiological studies may contribute to assessment of the relevance of these findings in the general population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study prospectively investigated the association between Lp(a) plasma concentrations, apo(a) phenotypes, and the 5-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis assessed by high-resolution duplex ultrasound in a random sample population of 826 individuals. We differentiated early atherogenesis (incident nonstenotic atherosclerosis) from advanced (stenotic) stages in atherosclerosis that originate mainly from atherothrombotic mechanisms. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis in a dose-dependent fashion, with this association being confined to subjects with LDL cholesterol levels above the population median (3.3 mmol/L). Apo(a) phenotypes were distributed similarly in subjects with and without early carotid atherosclerosis. In contrast, apo(a) phenotypes of low molecular weight emerged as one of the strongest risk predictors of advanced stenotic atherosclerosis, especially when associated with high Lp(a) plasma concentrations (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.8 to 14. 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) is one of the few risk factors capable of promoting both early and advanced stages of atherogenesis. Lp(a) plasma concentrations predicted the risk of early atherogenesis synergistically with high LDL cholesterol. Low-molecular-weight apo(a) phenotypes with a putatively high antifibrinolytic capacity in turn emerged as one of the leading risk conditions of advanced stenotic stages of atherosclerosis.

The functional and clinical significance of the Met-->Thr substitution in Kringle IV type 10 of apolipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], an independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, contains an apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] moiety covalently linked to a LDL moiety. Apo(a) is a glycoprotein homologous to plasminogen as it contains multiple repeats of a lysine binding domain resembling plasminogen kringle IV (K.IV). The multiple K.IV repeats can be differentiated in ten types that show a variation in their lysine binding capacity. Since K.IV type 10 shows the highest conservation of the amino acids postulated to form the lysine binding pocket, this kringle is suggested to be the main lysine binding site of apo(a). Recently, a T-->C polymorphism in the apo(a)-gene was reported, leading to a Met-->Thr substitution at amino acid position 66 of K.IV type 10, in the vicinity of the postulated lysine binding pocket. To investigate the significance of this substitution on some in vitro characteristics of Lp(a), the affinity for lysine-Sepharose and the binding affinity for limited plasmin digested des AA fibrin (Desafib-X) of the two subtypes was determined using plasma of donors homozygous for the polymorphism. These studies revealed a large heterogeneity in the binding characteristics, irrespective of the subtype. The comparison of the allele frequencies of this polymorphism in 155 patients having symptomatic atherosclerosis versus 153 normolipidemic controls revealed no significant differences. In conclusion, this study suggests that the presence of either a Met66 or a Thr66 residue in K.IV type 10 of apo(a) has no consequences for the binding characteristics of Lp(a) toward lysine-Sepharose or Desafib-X, nor is it associated with the presence of symptomatic atherosclerosis.

Lipoprotein (a) phenotype distribution in a population of bypass patients and its influence on lipoprotein (a) concentration

A case control study was undertaken to compare the distribution of apolipoprotein (a) phenotypes in patients suffering from atherosclerosis and undergoing coronary bypass surgery with the distribution observed in adequately selected controls. Cases differed from controls for triglycerides (1.90 +/- 0.88 mmol l-1 and 1.16 +/- 0.79 mmol l-1, P < 0.0001, respectively), HDL cholesterol (1.15 +/- 0.34 mmol l-1 and 1.69 +/- 0.42 mmol l-1, P < 0.0001, respectively), apolipoprotein AI (1.31 +/- 0.24 g l-1 and 1.70 +/- 0.29 g l-1, P < 0.0001, respectively) and lipoprotein a (Lp(a)) (0.32 +/- 0.30 g l-1 and 0.19 +/- 0.20 g l-1, P < 0.0001, respectively). The apolipoprotein (a) phenotypes were distributed differently in cases and controls (chi 2 = 25.26, P < 0.0001) with a lower percentage of isoforms of larger size and a higher percentage of isoforms of smaller size in patients. The Lp(a) concentration remained significantly higher in patients than in controls for most of the phenotypes, suggesting that both a high Lp(a) concentration and a different apolipoprotein (a) size distribution could be involved in the development of atherosclerosis in this population. In addition, patients exhibiting the highest Lp(a) concentrations had higher levels of LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B than patients exhibiting the lowest Lp(a) concentrations. This feature was not observed in controls. By contrast, controls with the highest Lp(a) concentration had significantly higher triglyceride levels than controls with the lowest Lp(a) concentration. This feature was not observed in patients. Our results indicate that patients undergoing bypass surgery have higher Lp(a) concentrations than controls, this increase being not completely explained by the difference in apolipoprotein (a) phenotype distribution. The high Lp(a) concentration seems to be associated with different lipid profiles in patients than in controls.

Pathophysiological implication of the structural domains of lipoprotein(a)

Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent risk factor for the premature development of cardiovascular disease. In spite of such evidence, the structural and functional features of this atherogenic, cholesterol-rich particle are not clearly understood. We have demonstrated the presence of two distinct structural domains in apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)), which are linked by a flexible and accessible region located between kringles 4-4 and 4-5. We have isolated the Lp(a) particle following removal of the N-terminal domain by proteolytic cleavage; the residual particle, containing the C-terminal domain (comprising the region from Kr 4-5 to the protease domain), is linked to apo B-100 by disulphide linkage, and is termed 'mini-Lp(a)'. Mini-Lp(a) exhibited the same binding affinity to fibrin as the corresponding Lp(a). This finding indicated that the kringles responsible for fibrin binding are restricted to Kr 4-5 to Kr 4-10, an observation consistent with the failure of the N-terminal domain to bind to fibrin. N-terminal fragments of apo(a) have been detected in the urine of normal subjects, thereby indicating that part of the catabolism of Lp(a), which is largely indeterminate, could occur via the renal route.

Lipoprotein(a): structural implications for pathophysiology

The assembly between a low-density lipoprotein particle and apolipoprotein(a), a highly carbohydrate-rich protein, gives origin to a peculiar class of lipoproteins, only found in the hedgehog, primates, and humans, termed lipoprotein(a). Apolipoprotein(a), which shares a high degree of sequence homology with the fibrinolytic proenzyme plasminogen, is linked to the apolipoprotein B-100 component of low-density lipoprotein via a disulfide bond and confers distinct biochemical and metabolic properties to lipoprotein(a). Because of its peculiar structural features and the observed correlation between high lipoprotein(a) levels and the development of a variety of atherosclerotic disorders, this lipoprotein has become the focus of an intense research effort. Although accumulation of lipoprotein(a) in the vessel wall at sites of vascular injury has been clearly evidenced, the mechanism(s) by which lipoprotein(a) exerts its pathogenic effect in this milieu remain largely unknown. It has been hypothesized that the pathological effect of lipoprotein(a) is related either to its similarity to low-density lipoprotein (i.e., a pro-atherogenic effect) or to the apolipoprotein(a) similarity to plasminogen (i.e., a pro-thrombotic/anti-fibrinolytic effect). However, it is probable that both components contribute to the pathogenicity of lipoprotein(a). The fact that lipoprotein(a) levels are largely genetically determined, varying widely among individuals and racial groups, adds additional elements to the scientific interest that surrounds this lipoprotein. Both clinical and biochemical studies of lipoprotein(a) have been complicated by the high degree of structural heterogeneity of apolipoprotein(a), which is considered the most polymorphic protein in human plasma. Our aim in this paper is to provide an overview of the most salient structural features of lipoprotein(a) and their possible pathophysiological implications.