Let's not push the “panic” button: A critical analysis of panic and panic disorder in adolescents

The impact of an 8-day intensive treatment for adolescent panic disorder and agoraphobia on comorbid diagnoses

Previous research findings have shown positive effects of cognitive-behavioral therapy for primary anxiety disorders as well as for nonprimary, co-occurring anxiety disorders. In this study, we analyzed data from an existing randomized controlled trial of intensive treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PDA) to examine the effects of the treatment on comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. The overall frequency and severity of aggregated comorbid diagnoses decreased in a group of adolescents who received an 8-day treatment for PDA. Results suggest that an 8-day treatment for PDA can alleviate the symptoms of some specific comorbid clinical diagnoses; in particular specific phobias, generalized anxiety disorder, and social phobia. These findings suggest that an intensive treatment for PDA is associated with reductions in comorbid symptoms even though disorders other than PDA are not specific treatment targets.

Panic disorder in clinically referred children and adolescents

The present study examined the frequency and characteristics of panic disorder in children and adolescents who had been referred to a pediatric psychopharmacology clinic. Of the 280 children and adolescents evaluated in this clinic, 35 were diagnosed with panic disorder using a semi-structured clinical interview (K-SADS) and other objective measures. Approximately half of the youngsters with panic disorder also met criteria for the diagnosis of agoraphobia. There was extensive comorbidity between panic disorder and other internalizing and externalizing disorders. Parents reported clinically significant levels of child symptomatology on the CBCL. Teacher-and child-reported symptomatology on the CBCL was within the normal range. At the same time, it was notable that no child had been referred specifically for evaluation or treatment of panic disorder or agoraphobia. Implications for clinical assessment/identification and treatment are discussed.

Differential clinical features of early-onset panic disorder

BACKGROUND

Although panic disorder (PD) begins typically in adulthood, an earlier onset is not uncommon. Recent studies on early-onset PD indicate that this subgroup of patients may display distinct clinical characteristics.

OBJECTIVE

To compare a subgroup of early-onset PD patients with the rest of the sample.

METHOD

A consecutive series of 442 patients with PD were included. Family histories were investigated, and clinical assessment employed the following instruments: Hamilton's scales, Global Functioning Scale, Marks-Mathews' Fears and Phobia Scale, and Panic-Associated Symptom Scale. The age threshold for 'early-onset' was considered at 18 years.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients (10.2%) exhibited early-onset PD, with a mean age at onset of 14.6. They were younger and had a longer duration of illness than later-onset patients. No differences were found in severity of panic symptoms, anxiety or depressive symptoms, and social functioning. They had more comorbidity with simple phobia, social phobia, and substance dependence. Rates of PD among first-degree relatives were higher in the early-onset group.

CONCLUSION

Early-onset PD patients displayed a greater familial loading, but clinical severity of their panic-agoraphobia symptoms was not higher. Comorbidity was greater with phobic and substance-related disorders.

The phenomenology of panic disorder in youngsters: an empirical study of a clinical sample

Questions about the existence of panic disorder in youngsters are now evolving into questions about the phenomenology of panic disorder in children and adolescents. The current study thus examined the primary clinical features of panic disorder in an outpatient sample of older children and adolescents with panic disorder. Youngsters with panic disorder were compared to a matched-gender group of youngsters with non-panic anxiety disorders. Dependent variables included diagnoses and self-ratings of fear, depression, general anxiety, and anxiety sensitivity. The panic group was found to display more frequent diagnoses of depression and greater levels of self-reported anxiety sensitivity than the non-panic group. These results are discussed in the context of one potential cognitive developmental pathway of panic disorder, and preliminary assessment and treatment recommendations are offered.

Assessment and phenomenology of nonclinical panic attacks in adolescent girls

Recent reviews of studies concerning panic attacks in adolescents have emphasized research limitations, noting problems of validity, reliability, and lack of normative data. To address some of these limitations we evaluated two methods of panic ascertainment (questionnaire versus interview), reliability of interview-determined panic, and clinical correlates of panic symptoms in a large sample (N = 1013) of early adolescent girls. The 5.4% of the sample who, when interviewed, reported ever experiencing a panic attack scored significantly higher on measures of depression, anxiety sensitivity, and alcohol use, but were not more avoidant than others. Using the interview as the standard, the questionnaire had a specificity of 81% and a sensitivity of 72%. Adolescents do experience panic attacks-whether identified by questionnaire or interview-although for many the attacks may not be salient. Longitudinal studies are required to determine those qualities of nonclinical panic (severity, context, interpretation/attribution), which render some episodes as clinically meaningful.

Panic in children and adolescents: a review

Based on our review of the available data, we conclude that panic attacks are common among adolescents, while both panic attacks and Panic Disorder appear to be present, but less frequent, in children. Furthermore, it is evident that both adolescents and children who report panic attacks describe the occurrence of cognitive symptoms, although with less frequency than physiological ones. Consistent with the cognitive model of panic, it seems that at least some youngsters are capable of experiencing the physiological symptoms of panic accompanied by the requisite catastrophic cognitions. However, a more complete understanding of the cognitive manifestation of panic attacks/disorder among children awaits further investigation. Future research should aim to explore the developmental progression in children's cognitive responses to specific panic symptomatology. Risk factors (e.g. anxiety sensitivity, depression) which may contribute to the likelihood of misinterpreting physiological sensations in a catastrophic manner throughout the course of development should also be assessed: Finally, we are in general agreement with Abelson and Alessi (1992) who argue that we must begin to ask ourselves how panic disorder may be manifested in children. That is, rather than assessing the frequency with which children experience symptoms of adult panic, we should explore what panic would look like in children. They propose that the study of panic in children would be facilitated by a reformulation of separation anxiety as a childhood expression of panic disorder. Although this reformulation makes intuitive sense and is appealing from a developmental perspective, we would insert a strong caveat. Although the research is yet to be conducted, it is probable that childhood separation anxiety is only one of many routes to panic disorder outcome. It is improbable that such direct and continuous pathways are present for the majority of children, adolescents and adults who experience panic disorder. More probably, the pathways are multiple, complex, and discontinuous (Robbins & Rutter, 1990). Much work remains to be done before we are able to ferret out the linkages between developmental processes and clinical outcomes for panic disorder in children and adolescents.