Chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Improved tumor-suppressive effect of OZ-001 combined with cisplatin mediated by mTOR/p70S6K and STAT3 inactivation in A549 human lung cancer cells

We previously reported the anticancer activity of 4-(4-fluorobenzylcarbamoylmethyl)-3-(4-cyclohexylphenyl)-2-[3-(N,N-dimethylureido)-N'-methylpropylamino]-3,4-dihydroquinazoline (OZ-001), a T-type calcium channel (TTCC) blocker, against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in vitro and in vivo. Here, we evaluated the synergistic effect of OZ-001 and cisplatin on A549 human lung cancer cells and A549 xenograft mice. Our study demonstrated that treatment with OZ-001 and cisplatin sensitized A549 cells to cisplatin and significantly inhibited cell growth, increased the number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL)-positive cells, and induced poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage in A549 cells and an A549 xenograft tumor mouse model. Moreover, our findings showed that mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70S6K), and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT3) inactivation was required for apoptosis induced by the combination of OZ-001 and cisplatin in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Our results suggest that combined treatment with OZ-001 and cisplatin could potentiate antiproliferative effects via suppression of the mTOR/p70S6K and STAT3 pathways and may be considered a potential therapeutic agent for NSCLC.

Estimating clinically meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy--Prostate: results from a clinical trial of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine clinically meaningful changes (CMCs) for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P).

METHODS

We obtained data from a Phase III trial of atrasentan in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients (n = 809). We determined anchor-based differences using Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), hemoglobin, time to disease progression (TTP), adverse events (AE), and survival. One-third and one-half standard deviation and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used as distribution-based criteria for CMCs. Comparison across baseline FACT-P domains and derived scales [FACT-P total score, Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score, prostate cancer subscale (PCS) score, pain-related score, and FACT Advanced Prostate Symptom Index (FAPSI)] were conducted for KPS, BAP, and hemoglobin using Student's t tests. Twelve-week change scores were compared for TTP, AE, and survival using ANCOVA.

RESULTS

CMCs were estimated as 6 to 10 for FACT-P total score, 5 to 9 for FACT-P TOI score, 2 to 3 for FACT-P PCS, 1 to 2 for the 4 PCS pain-related questions, and 2 to 3 for FAPSI. CMCs were also estimated using distribution-based criteria. Kappa statistics were computed to determine the degree of correspondence between the recommended guideline of 1.0 SEM and empirically derived standards. Most of the kappas for health-related quality of life domains and SEM standards had "substantial" to "almost perfect" concordance.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant relationship between clinical and quality of life data provides support for the use of CMCs to increase interpretability of FACT-P scores.

Assessment of quality of life and symptom improvement in lung cancer clinical trials

The majority of lung cancers are diagnosed at advanced stages when treatment options are limited and mainly palliative. In advanced lung cancer, quality-of-life (QOL) issues have become an integral part of making decisions about various treatment options. Recent clinical trials in patients with lung cancer have assessed symptom improvement and QOL as important endpoints. There are several valid and reliable QOL assessment instruments that specifically evaluate symptoms of lung cancer. These questionnaires evaluate a variety of factors related to emotional, physical, and social well-being. Several key factors, including age, gender, comorbidities, and quality of supportive care may affect symptoms and QOL in patients with lung cancer. Overall, QOL is important for patients with advanced lung cancer; therefore, symptom and QOL assessments are becoming vital in evaluating the efficacy of emerging cancer treatments.

Ifosfamide in non-small cell lung cancer

In recent years the role of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been well established. Ifosfamide is an old drug still considered an effective cytostatic agent in the treatment of NSCLC. As a single agent, it has showed a response rate of 20-25%. These results are improved when it is used in combination with cisplatin and mitomycin C. Moreover, in recent years, several new drugs like gemcitabine, taxanes and vinorelbine have been identified, and combinations of two or three drugs have been tested in patients with advanced NSCLC. This paper reviews the main studies recently conducted for the treatment of NSCLC, considering the results obtained by ifosfamide alone and in combination. Three-drug regimens including first-generation cytostatic agents achieve a response rate of about 40% and median survival of 10 months. In combinations with new drugs, ifosfamide shows an improvement in response rate (50%) with a median survival of more than 1 year. Open questions in the treatment of NSCLC are whether three-drug are better than two-drug combinations, and whether cisplatin is still required.

Platinum drugs in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

The use of chemotherapy is considered standard therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer that cannot be treated with radiotherapy and in those with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status. This approach is also accepted in patients with earlier stage disease, when combined with radiotherapy in those with non-resectable locally advanced disease, or in the preoperative setting. Randomised clinical studies and meta-analyses of the literature have confirmed the beneficial survival effect of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cisplatin and carboplatin have been successfully used with other drugs in a wide variety of well-established two-drug combinations while three-drug combinations are still under investigation. Cisplatin and carboplatin use is limited by toxicity and inherent resistance. These considerations have prompted research into new platinum agents, such as the trinuclear platinum agent BBR3464, the platinum complex ZD0473 and oxaliplatin. These compounds could be developed in combination with agents such as paclitaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine in patients with advanced and/or refractory solid tumours.

Quality of life in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this paper is to present the results of a randomized trial comparing the effects of two chemotherapy regimens on the Quality of life (QOL) of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Trials in advanced stage disease represent an important treatment context for QOL assessment. A second purpose of this paper is to examine methods for handling the level of missing data commonly observed in the advanced stage disease context.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin plus vinorelbine or carboplatin plus paclitaxel. The QOL of 222 patients was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) prior to randomization; follow-up assessments occurred at 13 and 25 weeks. Three methods were used to analyze the QOL data: (1) cross-sectional analysis of four patient categories (improved, stable, missing, and declined) based on changes in the FACT-L score, (2) a mixed linear model, and (3) a pattern mixture model. The longitudinal analyses addressed two potential data biases.

RESULTS

Questionnaire submission rates were 91% at baseline, 68% at 13 weeks, and 47% at 25 weeks. The cross-sectional and mixed linear model analyses did not show significant differences by treatment arm in patient-reported QOL. The pattern mixture model analysis, more appropriate given non-ignorable missing data, also found no statistically significant effect of treatment on patient QOL.

CONCLUSION

We present a sensitivity analysis approach with multiple methods for analyzing treatment effects on patient QOL in the presence of substantial, non-ignorable missing data in an advanced stage disease clinical trial. We conclude that the two treatment arms did not differ statistically in their effects on patient QOL over a 25-week treatment period.

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin versus etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a randomized trial to compare gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary end point of the comparison was response rate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 135 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3 along with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV day 1. Both treatments were administered in 21-day cycles. One hundred thirty-three patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis of response.

RESULTS

The response rate (externally validated) for patients given gemcitabine-cisplatin was superior to that for patients given etoposide-cisplatin (40.6% v 21.9%; P = .02). This superior response rate was associated with a significant delay in time to disease progression (6.9 months v 4.3 months; P = .01) without an impairment in quality of life (QOL). There was no statistically significant difference in survival time between both arms (8.7 months for gemcitabine-cisplatin v 7.2 months for etoposide-cisplatin; P = .18). The overall toxicity profile for both combinations of drugs was similar. Nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently in the gemcitabine arm than in the etoposide arm. However, the difference was not significant. Gemcitabine-cisplatin produced less grade 3 alopecia (13% v 51%) and less grade 4 neutropenia (28% v 56% ) but more grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (56% v 13%) than did etoposide-cisplatin. However, there were no thrombocytopenia-related complications in the gemcitabine arm.

CONCLUSION

Compared with etoposide-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin provides a significantly higher response rate and a delay in disease progression without impairing QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Predictive factors of tumor response and prognostic factors of survival during lung cancer chemotherapy

The aim of this study was (i) to determine predictive factors of a complete response to chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and predictive factors of an objective response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and (ii) to determine whether prognostic factors are different with regard to treatment response and survival. Ninety-nine patients with SCLC and two hundred and two patients with NSCLC received chemotherapy. The following variables were recorded prior to treatment: tumor, node, metastasis status, performance status, body weight loss, blood leukocyte count, serum sodium, serum albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase, serum NSE, serum TPS, and serum CYFRA 21-1. Tumor response was analyzed at the 10th week. Analysis of survival were done using the landmark method. Hazard ratios of the significant prognostic variables of survival were calculated using the Cox's model. Odds ratios of the significant predicting factors of response were calculated by stepwise logistic regression. In SCLC, the significant determinants of poor survival were: lack of complete response (HR: 2.04), weight loss (HR: 1.76), high serum LDH level (HR: 1.64), and high serum TPS level (HR: 2.47). A high serum TPS level was the only factor among those studied able to predict lack of achievement of complete response (OR: 0.39). In NSCLC, significant determinants of poor survival were: no objective response (HR: 2.28), poor performance status (HR: 2.52), presence of metastases (HR: 1.51), and high serum CYFRA 21-1 level (HR: 1.84). On the other hand, a high serum TPS level (OR: 0.50), the presence of metastases (OR: 0.45), and a leukocyte blood count over 10,000/microl (OR: 0.43) were independent determinants for a patient not to achieve an objective response. We concluded that the predictive factors of complete response in SCLC remain to be defined. On the other hand, in NSCLC three variables contribute to the prediction of an objective response. Finally, determinants of survival differ from predictive factors of response.

Single agent versus combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a meta-analysis of response, toxicity, and survival

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of single agent versus combination chemotherapy on response rate, toxicity, and survival of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

The authors reviewed randomized clinical trials published in the medical literature and the reference lists of relevant articles. Objective response rate, survival at 6 and 12 months, and the incidence of treatment-related death were compared among all patients receiving single agent chemotherapy and those receiving combination chemotherapy. A subgroup analysis for all outcomes was conducted for 10 trials published between 1989 and 1996 that used a platinum analogue or vinorelbine as the single agent arm.

RESULTS

The authors identified 38 potentially eligible trials, 25 of which (with a total of 5156 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, combination chemotherapy produced a nearly 2-fold increase in response rate compared with single agent chemotherapy (response rate [RR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-2.42). However, combination chemotherapy also increased toxicity significantly, including a 3.6-fold increase in the risk of treatment-related death (RR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.8-6.7). Survival at 6 months (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02-1.19) and 12 months (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03-1.45) was modestly superior with combination chemotherapy when all trials are included. However, when a platinum analogue or vinorelbine are used as single agents, this difference was no longer statistically significant at 6 months (RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.92-1.15) or at 12 months (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.94-1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy increased objective response and toxicity rates compared with single-agent chemotherapy. Survival was prolonged only modestly with combination chemotherapy but not significantly so when more active single agents were used.

Differences in treatment and survival rates of non-small-cell lung cancer in three regions of France

Treatment and survival rates of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were compared between three French Cancer Registries (Calvados, Doubs, Tarn). The methodological issues in such comparisons are discussed. The treatments for NSCLC differed between the regions: radiotherapy tended to be preferred in Calvados (73% vs 21.3% surgery), whereas surgery was more frequently employed in Doubs and Tarn (27.7% and 37% respectively). The percentage of cases receiving no therapeutic treatment ranged from 7.8% (Calvados) to 26% (Tarn). Despite the differences in treatment, the overall survival rates were similar in the three regions. Adjustment for treatment in such a descriptive study may be misleading since different therapeutic strategies in different regions may lead to selection of patients of systematically better or poorer prognosis in the various treatment groups.

[Evaluation of tumor response during chemotherapy of bronchial cancer]

Chemotherapy of lung cancer is still an experimental approach requiring careful evaluation. Tumour response (marker of anticancer activity) is not perfectly correlated to survival (marker of chemotherapy efficacy), but its evaluation remains a milestone inasmuch as reporting a wrong tumour response rate might lead to the rejection of active new treatments. This review deals with the method of tumour response measurements and its use during a chemotherapy protocol. Recommendations drawn from the analysis of the literature are: 1) to assess and classify all lesions which can be identified at the beginning of the treatment; 2) to define the target lesions, mainly the ones which can be bidimensionally measured; 3) to use the World Health Organization recommendations for reporting the overall response; 4) to confirm complete response by negative rebiopsies; 5) to avoid second fiberoptic bronchoscopy to patients with stable or progressive disease on CT-scan, and finally; 6) to assess response quality by evaluating response duration and improvement of quality of life.

Single-agent chemotherapy versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a quality and meta-analysis study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To estimate the quality of the studies and to compare single-agent with combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

DESIGN

Identification of published randomized trials and extraction of essential results directly from the published reports.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Survival probability at 1 year, as estimated from the published survival curves, has been considered as the end-point of interest. Quality scoring of the studies has also been performed. Arithmetical calculation, concerning the estimation of quantities necessary for the meta-analysis of the literature, has been addressed. The estimated pooled Odds Ratio of death was 0.8, with 95% confidence interval of 0.6-1.0, thus favoring combination chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our meta-analysis favor combination chemotherapy. They must, however, be considered in the light of their clinical relevance and of the balance between quality of life, toxicity and costs of chemotherapy.

Smoking behaviors of women after diagnosis with lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to describe the smoking behavior of women with a recent diagnosis or recurrence of lung cancer. A convenience sample of women (N = 65) participated in interviews about their smoking status, their perception of the effect of their diagnosis on the smoking behaviors of others, and self reports of symptom distress and functional status. Content analysis of the audiotapes was used to classify responses. Exemplars describe feelings related to smoking, smoking cessation, and responses of others. Current smokers were likely to be younger (F4.60 = 4.3, p < .05). In this small sample, symptom distress and functional status were not statistically differentiated by smoking status; current smokers had the greatest mean distress from cough. Diagnosis had a variable effect on the smoking behavior of family members with over 25% stopping smoking in response to the diagnosis; 31% of smoking spouses continued to smoke.

Weight change and lung cancer: relationships with symptom distress, functional status, and smoking

The pattern of weight change (at five 6-week intervals beginning 2 months after diagnosis of advanced disease) is described in adults with progressive lung cancer (N = 60). Weight loss of 10% or more at study entry occurred in 35% of subjects; 37% lost weight at three or more intervals; and 25% lost weight at only one interval. Pre-illness weight loss was moderately correlated with subsequent decreased functional status (Enforced Social Dependency Scale) at Times 1, 2, and 3 (r = -.49, r = -.43, r = -.48, p < .001). Weight loss correlated with subsequent increased symptom distress (Symptom Distress Scale, SDS) at three times (Times 2, 4, and 5: r = -.34, r = -.30, r = -.43, p < .05). Chemotherapy (50% of subjects) and smoking (25% at study entry) predicted weight loss from Time 1 to 5, explaining 28% of the variance.

Review of the curative role of radiotherapy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

The present paper is a comprehensive review of available data concerning the role of radiotherapy as an intended curative treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCL). The following issues are reviewed (1) optimal dose, (2) optimal fractionation, (3) optimal treatment planning, (4) clinical results in terms of single treatment and combined treatment with either surgery or chemotherapy. In resectable NSCLC high dose radiotherapy to small localized tumours gives a 5-year survival rate of 7-38%. It is concluded that this treatment modality is appropriate for certain selected patients who refuse to have surgery, who have medical contradications for surgery, or who are of old age. It is discussed whether the treatment should be split course, continuous, hypo-og hyperfraction. A total dose of 55 Gy must be given. CT scanning should be mandatory for optimal planning and therapy. The literature does not give a conclusive answer to whether preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy is indicated. The data indicate that patients with Stage III NSCLC will benefit from a combined treatment modality in terms of chemotherapy based on high dose cisplatinum and radiotherapy. The main conclusion of the review is that many areas with randomized controlled trials are needed in order to answer the critical issue of the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of NSCLS.

Chemotherapy vs supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Results of a meta-analysis of the literature

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To contribute to the current debate about the relative merits of meta-analysis of the literature (MAL) and of individual patients data (MAP).

DESIGN

Identification of published randomized trials and extraction of essential results directly from the published reports.

SETTING

Chemotherapy vs supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Survival probability at 6 months after randomization, as estimated from the published survival curves, has been considered as the end-point of interest. Quality scoring of the studies has also been performed. Specific methodologic issues concerning the estimation of relevant quantities necessary for the MAL have been addressed. The estimated pooled odds ratio of death was 0.44, with 95 percent confidence interval of 0.32 to 0.59, thus significantly favoring chemotherapy, and it corresponds to an estimated increase in median survival from 3.9 months for best supportive care to 6.7 for chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our MAL, favoring chemotherapy, are in line with those of a MAP recently published. However, they have to be considered in the light of their actual clinical relevance and of the balance between quality of life, toxicity, and costs of chemotherapy and best supportive care.

Comparison of two chemotherapeutic regimens--mitomycin + vindesine + cisplatin (MVP) vs. mitomycin + ifosfamide + cisplatin (MIP)--in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. ONCOPAZ Cooperative Group

BACKGROUND

A prospectively randomized trial was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two chemotherapeutic regimens widely used in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 1989 to March 1992, 196 patients with measurable disease were included in the trial. Ninety-three patients received mitomycin-vindesine-cisplatin (MVP) and 94 mitomycin-ifosfamide-cisplatin (MIP).

RESULTS

The objective response rate (complete plus partial remissions) was 28% (26/93 patients, 95% confidence interval 20%-40%) in the MVP arm and 30% (28/94 patients, 95% confidence interval 20.5%-40%) in the MIP arm. The median survival was 8.5 and 9 months, respectively. Neither the response rates nor the median survivals were significantly different. Grade III-IV leukopenia was more frequent with MVP (13% vs. 2% of the courses, p < 0.001), as well as grade I-II neurologic toxicity (30% vs. 6%, p < 0.001). In contrast, grade I-II anemia and grade I-II urologic toxicity were more frequent with MIP (7% vs. 25%, p < 0.001 and 1% vs. 11%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Given the low efficacy of both schemes in the treatment of advanced NSCLC, their use cannot be recommended outside of clinical trials.

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: new cytostatic agents

The literature on new cytostatic drugs in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and on new methods for administration of established drugs has been reviewed back to 1985. Two well-known cytostatic drugs, ifosfamide and etoposide, have been evaluated in trials using oral administration instead of the usual intravenous route, and a total of 26 new investigative drugs has also been evaluated. Oral administration of etoposide is associated with an accumulated response rate of 17% in four studies using a dose of 50 mg/m2 daily for 2-3 weeks, followed by 1 week's rest. Oral administration of ifosfamide yields an accumulated response rate of 18% when the dose intensity is 7 g or more during a 4-week period. Among the new drugs tested, the most promising seem to be campthothecin-11, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, taxol, fotemustine, and zeniplatin which have all shown response rates above 20% among previously untreated patients. Also, the antimetabolites 10-EDAM and trimetrexate and the platinum analogues carboplatin and (glycolate-0,0) diammine-platinum(II) are of interest, with cumulative response rates above 15% in previously untreated patients.

Oral verapamil with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomised study

To determine if the chemotherapy resistance of non-small cell lung cancer could be modified by oral verapamil, 72 patients were entered into a randomised trial of verapamil plus chemotherapy vs the same chemotherapy alone. Verapamil 480 mg day-1 was given for 3 days starting 24 h prior to chemotherapy which consisted of bolus vindesine 7 mg followed by ifosfamide/mesna 5 g m-2 over 24 h, followed by mesna alone for a further 8 h. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for up to six courses. Sixty-six patients were eligible for tumour response analysis and responses occurred in 41% of those randomised to chemotherapy plus verapamil and in 18% of those randomised to chemotherapy alone (P = 0.057). Median survival from start of treatment was significantly better in the verapamil arm (P = 0.02). Toxicity of the combination of chemotherapy plus verapamil was principally neurological and was manageable. Thus the addition of oral verapamil to vindesine/ifosfamide chemotherapy is feasible and in this study was associated with improved outcome. Further confirmation of these observations is required in non-small cell lung cancer, a tumour characterised by resistance to conventional chemotherapy.

Women with lung cancer: impact on quality of life

The purpose of this study was to describe disruptions in quality of life (QOL) in women suffering from lung cancer, the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. QOL was measured with the CARES-SF. Symptom distress was measured with the modified Symptom Distress Scale, and functional status was measured with the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale. Sixty-nine women with lung cancer participated in a one-time data collection. The typical subject was under 65 years of age, married, has had primary or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer for over 12 months, had limited disease, and was not currently receiving treatment. Subjects had greater disruptions in global QOL and its dimensions compared to a normative heterogeneous female cancer sample. The most prevalent serious disruptions were fatigue, difficulty with household chores, worry about ability to care for self, and worry about cancer progression. The global CARES-SF score was moderately correlated to functional status (r = 0.69, p = < 0.001), and to symptom distress (r = 0.72, p = < 0.001). Symptom distress was associated strongly with the physical subscale of QOL (r = 0.80, p = 0.001) and significantly but less strongly with all other dimensions of QOL. Significantly greater differences in disruptions of quality of life occurred in women younger than 65 years (p = 0.04), women with recurrent disease (p = 0.003), and women with low income (p = 0.008). In stepwise regression, symptom distress predicted 53% of the variance followed by functional status (59%) and recurrence (63%) when QOL was the outcome variable.

Assessment of palliative chemotherapy: a step beyond response

In summary, tumour response is a useful index of cytotoxic activity, but is of limited value in the assessment of benefit to the patient following treatment with cytotoxic drugs. Survival is a similarly inappropriate endpoint to assess the clinical benefits of palliative cytotoxic therapy. The widespread introduction of QL assessment as a primary outcome measure in cancer therapy will enhance our understanding of the value of a wide range of established cancer treatments, not only that of palliative chemotherapy, but also surgery and radiotherapy.

MICE: a new active combination for non-small cell lung cancer

We have treated 38 patients with stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer with the following regimen: mitomycin-C = 6 mg/m2, ifosfamide = 3 g/m2, cisplatin = 75 mg/m2, vindesine = 3 mg/m2 (MICE), intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, every 3 weeks. Among 26 patients with stage IV disease, 15 obtained a partial remission (PR) (response rate = 57%, 95% confidence interval = 38-76), with a median time to disease progression and a median survival of 4.9 and 7.1 months, respectively. 6 out 7 patients with stage IIIA disease were documented as PR and 5 of them underwent radical surgery with two pathologically confirmed complete remissions. Overall toxicity was substantial but manageable: 3 patients had grade III/IV leucopenia (although 5 patients had neutropenic fever) whereas 13 patients experienced grade II/II anaemia. In conclusion we believe that MICE regimen is an interesting combination and warrants further evaluations both for palliation and in a neoadjuvant setting.

Phase II study of 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin in non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

A total of 44 patients with previously untreated; non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin (IDX), which is an analogue of doxorubicin with less cardiotoxicity. Patients received 80 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks. Dose reductions were carried out for haematological toxicity. Response was assessed prior to each treatment according to WHO criteria. Among the 43 evaluable patients, 1 (2%; 95% confidence limits, 0-8%) achieved a partial response. Leucocytopenia of WHO grade 3 or 4 occurred in 64% of patients and corresponding thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 occurred in 30%. Of the 26 patients who were evaluated by measurements of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 4 had a decline in LVEF of more than 15%, and 2 patients developed congestive heart failure. Myocardial biopsies were not done. In conclusion, IDX is not active in NSCLC at the applied dose and on the schedule used. Moreover, it does not seem possible to increase the dose intensity further due to the observed toxicity.

Phase II study of Edatrexate in stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer

A total of 49 patients with advanced, previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a new antifolate, Edatrexate (10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin; 10-EdAM). Patients received 80 mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks, and responders received a further 6 cycles at 2-week intervals. Dose reductions were carried out for haematological toxicity and mucositis. Response was assessed prior to each treatment according to WHO criteria. Among the 45 evaluable patients, 6 [13.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-26%] achieved a partial response (PR) and 9 (20%; 95% CI, 11%-34%) showed a minor response (MR; 25%-50% reduction in the sum of 2 perpendicular tumour diameters). In those receiving four or more cycles of treatment, the PR and MR rates were 17.6% and 26.4%, respectively. The resultant toxicity mainly constituted skin rash, mucositis and myelosuppression. Edatrexate is active against NSCLC and produces toxicity profile similar to that of methotrexate.