Serological and molecular evidence of infection by human T-cell lymphotropic virus type II in Italian drug addicts by use of synthetic peptides and polymerase chain reaction

Epidemiology and Etiopathology of Human T-Lymphotropic Viruses: Diagnostic and Clinical Implications for Non-Endemic Areas

Human T-lymphotropic viruses (HTLV) type I and II were first described more than a decade ago. HTLV-I epidemiology and etiopathology are more defined than those of HTLV-II, but conflicting results have been obtained in seroepidemiologic surveys, mainly for difficulties in the discrimination between the two infections. The introduction of advanced serologic and molecular assays has recently provided sensitive and specific tools for diagnosis, and the epidemiologic and etiopathologic patterns linked to these retroviruses are being more precisely defined. Moreover, extensive nucleotide sequence analyses performed so far have mainly focused on HTLV-I isolates. The recent discovery of new HTLV-II endemic areas and the isolation of HTLV-II strains from intravenous drug users have finally provided the material for the molecular characterization of HTLV-II isolates, which is now a rapidly envolving field. We review the diagnostic strategies available and the etiologic associations reported so far for both viruses and also discuss the occurrence and significance of indeterminate serologic reactivities observed in both endemic and non-endemic areas.

Characteristic distribution of HTLV type I and HTLV type II carriers among native ethnic groups in South America

To confirm the geographic and ethnic segregation of HTLV-I and HTLV-II carriers in native populations in South America, we have conducted a seroepidemiological study of native populations in South America, including HTLV-I carriers distributed among seven ethnic groups in the Andes highlands of Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, and Chile, and two ethnic groups on Chiloe Island and Easter Island; and HTLV-II carriers distributed among seven ethnic groups of the lowlands along the Atlantic coast of Colombia, Orinoco, Amazon, and Patagonia, and one ethnic group on Chiloe Island. The incidence rate of HTLV-I and HTLV-II carriers varied among the ethnic groups, ranging from 0.8 to 6.8% for HTLV-I seropositivity and from 1.4 to 57.9% for HTLV-II seropositivity. A new HTLV-I focus was found among the Peruvian Aymara (1.6%), the Bolivian Aymara (5.3%) and Quechua (4.5%), the Argentine Puna (2.3%), and the Chilean Atacama (4.1%), while on HTLV-II focus was found among the Brazilian Kayapo (57.9%), the Paraguayan Chaco (16.4%), and the Chilean Alacalf (34.8%) and Yahgan (9.1%). The distribution of HTLV-I/II foci showed a geographic clustering of HTLV-I foci in the Andes highlands and of HTLV-II foci in the lowlands of South America. It was thus suggested that South American natives might be divided into two major ethnic groups by HTLV-I and HTLV-II carrier state.

The origin and evolution of human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II

Studies on human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I (HTLV-I) and II (HTLV-II) are briefly reviewed from the viewpoint of molecular evolution, with special reference to the evolutionary rate and evolutionary relationships among these viruses. In particular, it appears that, in contrast to the low level of variability of HTLV-I among different isolates, individual isolates form quasispecies structures. Elucidating the mechanisms connecting these two phenomena will be one of the future problems in the study of the molecular evolution of HTLV-I and HTLV-II.

Seroepidemiology of the human T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma viruses in Europe. The HTLV European Research Network

An extensive collaboration of laboratories and investigators has been developed to define the seroprevalence of human T-cell leukaemia/ lymphoma virus type I and II (HTLV-I and -II) infection in Europe. An algorithm for serological screening for HTLV-I and -II infection has been established by consensus. Data from screening almost 4 million subjects, including many unpublished studies, which conform to this algorithm are presented. In extensive studies the seroprevalence of HTL.V-I/II in blood donors is low, ranging from < 1 in 100,000 to 30 in 100,000 donors and is due predominantly to HTLV-I. In antenatal clinics in France and the United Kingdom the seroprevalence of HTLV-I is > 0.2%, but surveillance in this setting has been limited and extensive study of the seroprevalence of HTLV-I/II infection in pregnant women in Europe is urgently required to determine the need for HTLV-I/II antenatal screening. HTLV-I is present in populations who have immigrated to Europe from endemic areas and is spreading into indigenous European populations, particularly through sexual transmission to females. HTLV-II infection is present predominantly amongst IVDU and is usually a coinfection with HIV-I. There are considerable regional differences in HTLV-II seroprevalence.

Human T-cell leukemia virus type II infection among high risk groups and its influence on HIV-1 disease progression

The prevalence and the risk factors of the human T-cell leukemia virus type I/II (HTLV-I/II) infection were evaluated among 552 individuals at high risk for HIV-1. HTLV infections showed a low (1.6%) prevalence, were restricted to intravenous drug addicts and were due to HTLV-II alone. Moreover, in order to weigh the influence of HTLV-II on the natural history of HIV-1 infection, the clinical outcome of HIV-1 disease was compared between subjects with and without HTLV-II coinfection. Our findings showed that HTLV-II does not adversely affect the outcome of HIV-1 infection. Infact, a slower disease progression has been recorded in some HTLV-II coinfected subjects.

Typing human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) by nested polymerase chain reaction: application to clinical specimens

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and II provirus DNA was detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). MT-2 (HTLV-I infected), C3/44 Mo (HTLV-II infected) cell lines and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) from HTLV seropositive samples were used. The procedure consists of first amplification which detects both HTLV-I and HTLV-II, and a second amplification (nested-PCR) to discriminate between the two viruses and to improve sensitivity. Optimal conditions of MgCl2 concentration and annealing temperature were found for maximal amplification and specificity. This method was used for the amplification of conserved regions of pol and env genes. 1.5 pg of MT-2 and 5 pg of C3/44 Mo cell line DNAs were detected using nested-PCR and liquid hybridization in the pol system. The env system could detect 1.5 pg of MT-2 and 1.5 pg of C3/44 Mo cell lines DNAs using nested-PCR and liquid hybridization. The pol system can type both HTLV-I and HTLV-II in only two steps without the use of type-specific radiolabeled probes. Furthermore, this method can detect and discriminate the two viruses in one step PCR using the primers used in the nested-PCR. Nevertheless, there is a decrease in sensitivity of 100-fold. The results of five seropositive samples confirmed by Western blot are compared with PCR. PCR typed one of these samples as HTLV-I and the rest as HTLV-II. This technique is useful in cases such as window period, perinatal studies and when serologic results are not satisfactory.

HTLV-I/II infection in a high viral endemic area of Zaire, Central Africa: comparative evaluation of serology, PCR, and significance of indeterminate western blot pattern

The frequency of indeterminate Western blot (WB) seroreactivities against HTLV-I "gag encoded proteins" only, and the use of low specific diagnostic WB criteria led to the overestimation of HTLV-I seroprevalence in initial studies in intertropical Africa and Papua New Guinea. In order to clarify the meaning of such seroreactivity, 98 blood samples of individuals from a high HTLV-I endemic area in Zaire, Central Africa were studied by a WB assay containing HTLV-I disrupted virions enriched with a gp 21 recombinant protein and a synthetic peptide from the gp 46 region (MTA-1), and by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with 3 primers pairs and 4 different HTLV-I and or HTLV-II-specific probes. These 98 samples were taken mainly from patients with neurological diseases and from their relatives. Using stringent WB criteria, 28 sera (29%) were considered as HTLV-I-positive, 3 as negative and 67 (68%) as indeterminate. A large proportion of these indeterminate sera would have been considered as HTLV-I-positive samples according to previous low specific WB diagnostic criteria. After PCR, 35 samples (36%) were considered as positive for the presence of HTLV-I proviral DNA. Out of the 67 WB seroindeterminate, 10 (15%) were found HTLV-I-positive by PCR. These 10 individuals exhibited in WB multiple band reactivity with p19 and/or p24 (7 cases of both) associated in 6 cases with rgp 21, but never with MTA-1. No samples were found PCR-positive for HTLV-II despite the findings of 11 sera suggestive of HTLV-II by WB.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections among HIV-1 seropositive patients in Sao Paulo, Brazil

To estimate the presence of, and the risk factors for HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections among HIV-1 infected subjects in Sao Paulo, Brazil, a serosurvey was performed in 471 HIV-1 infected patients, including 216 intravenous drug addicts (IVDA), 229 homosexual/bisexual men, and 26 with other risk factors. Serum samples were screened for HTLV seroreactivity by ELISA; reactive samples were analyzed by Western Blot (WB), using whole HTLV-I lysate as antigen. To confirm and discriminate HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections, sera presenting any bands on WB were further analyzed by a WB containing recombinant HTLV-I and HTLV-II proteins (WB 2.3), and by enzyme immunoassays using synthetic peptides specific for envelope proteins (Synth-EIA). In 22 cases, cell samples were available for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies. On WB, 114 sera were reactive and, of these, 37 and 25 were concordantly positive on both WB 2.3 and Synth-EIA procedures for HTLV-I and HTLV-II specific antibodies, respectively; 37 specimens were negative on both assays, and 15 gave discordant or indeterminate results. PCR findings confirmed concordant results obtained in the discriminatory serological assays. The prevalence rates of HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections were 15.3% and 11.1% in IVDA, and 0.9% and 0.4% in homosexual/bisexual men, respectively. No case of HTLV-I/HTLV-II co-infection was found.

Diagnosis of infection with human T-lymphotropic virus type II (HTLV-II) in Norwegian HIV-infected individuals

Sera from 298 HIV-infected individuals from Southern Norway were examined for antibodies against HTLV. 30 sera (10.1%) were HTLV-II positive and 1(0.3%) HTLV-I positive. 25 of the HTLV-II infected subjects were intravenous drug abusers (IVDAs), giving a prevalence of HTLV-II infection of 24.5% in this group. Examination of blood samples by polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction enzyme analysis or sequencing confirmed the serological diagnosis. To evaluate current screening and verification HTLV tests, 44 sera were examined using a gelatin particle agglutination test, 5 different enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISA) and 4 Western blots (WB). While earlier ELISAs and WBs were inadequate, a recent ELISA and WB including recombinant envelope glycoproteins from both viruses permitted serological diagnosis and distinction between HTLV-I and HTLV-II. Thus, HTLV-II now spreads among IVDAs in a North-European country. Health authorities in other countries should estimate the magnitude of the problem to decide upon measures to avoid transmission through blood transfusion.