New anthracycline derivatives: what for?

The Efficacy of Amifostine against Multiple-Dose Doxorubicin-Induced Toxicity in Rats

Amifostine is well known cytoprotector which is efficient when administered before a wide range of antineoplastic agents. The aim of our study was to investigate amifostine effects on doxorubicin-induced toxic changes in rats. Amifostine (75 mg/kg ip) was given 30 min before each dose of doxorubicin (cumulatively 20 mg/kg ip, for 28 days). The animals’ whole-body, liver, and kidney weight, serum biochemical examination, as well as microscopic examination of bone marrow, peripheral blood, liver, and kidney, were done on day 56 of the study. Hepatic and renal alterations were carefully quantified by semiquantitative grading scales—hepatic and renal damage score, respectively. In amifostine-pretreated rats, the number of peripheral blood leukocytes was significantly higher in comparison to doxorubicin-only treated group, preferentially protecting neutrophils. In the same group of rats, hepatic and renal alterations associated with polymorphonuclear cell infiltrates were significantly less severe than those observed in animals receiving only doxorubicin. Our results showed that amifostine successfully protected rats against multiple-dose doxorubicin-induced toxicity by complex, and still not fully elucidated mechanisms of action.

Fullerenol nanoparticles prevents doxorubicin-induced acute hepatotoxicity in rats

Doxorubicin (DOX), commonly used antineoplastic agent, affects bone marrow, intestinal tract and heart, but it also has some hepatotoxic effects. Main mechanism of its toxicity is the production of free reactive oxygen species. Polyhidroxilated C₆₀ fullerene derivatives, fullerenol nanoparticles (FNP), act as free radical scavengers in in vitro systems. The aim of the study was to investigate potential FNP protective role against DOX-induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Experiments were performed on adult male Wistar rats. Animals were divided into five groups: (1) 0.9% NaCl (control), (2) 100mg/kg ip FNP, (3) 10mg/kg DOX iv, (4) 50mg/kg ip FNP 30min before 10mg/kg iv DOX, (5) 100mg/kg ip FNP 30min before 10mg/kg iv DOX. A general health condition, body and liver weight, TBARS level and antioxidative enzyme activity, as well as pathohistological examination of the liver tissue were conducted on days 2 and 14 of the study. FNP, applied alone, did not alter any examinated parameters. However, when used as a pretreatment it significantly increased survival rate, body and liver weight, and decreased TBARS level, antioxidative enzyme activity and hepatic damage score in DOX-treated rats. FNP administered at a dose of 100mg/kg significantly attenuated effects of doxorubicin administered in a single high dose in rats, concerning general condition, body and liver weight, lipid peroxidation level and antioxidative enzyme activity as well as structural alterations of the hepatic tissue.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of BBR 3576, a novel aza-anthrapyrazole, administered i.v. every 4 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I study group trial of the Central European Society of Anticancer-Drug Research (CESAR)

BBR 3576 is a novel aza-anthrapyrazole with limited potential for cardiotoxicity in preclinical models. This phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the pharmacokinetic profile of BBR 3576 administered i.v. as a 1-h infusion repeated every 4 weeks. In total, 27 patients were treated at doses starting from 1 to 150 mg/m2. The dose levels 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 90, 125 and 150 mg/m2 were investigated in one, three, one, three, two, one, three, four, three and six patients, respectively. The DLT was a grade 3 stomatitis at 150 mg/m2. At this dose level as well as at 125 mg/m2, neutropenia grade 3 and 4 were frequently seen, but not reaching the criteria for DLT. Time to neutrophil nadir was about 2 weeks and recovery took place within 1 week. Other bone marrow toxicities were mild; lymphopenia was also observed. No significant drug-induced cardiotoxicity was observed. The plasma concentration versus time curves of BBR 3576 showed a biexponential profile with a linear kinetic behavior. A very large volume of distribution, a high plasma clearance and long elimination half-lives were calculated. Renal unchanged drug excretion was less than 10% and therefore a minor excretion route. No objective antitumor responses were found. On the basis of this study, the recommended dose for phase II studies is 150 mg/m2, although the maximum tolerated dose as per protocol definition was not reached. This trial showed that BBR 3576 has a manageable toxicity profile on a 4-week schedule. Phase II studies have started in patients with solid tumors, as suggested by preclinical data in different in vivo model systems.

Anthracyclines in the treatment of cancer. An overview

Anthracyclines are widely used and effective antineoplastic drugs. Although active against a wide variety of solid tumours and haematological malignancies, their clinical use is hindered by tumour resistance and toxicity to healthy tissue. Modification of the general anthracycline ring structure results in analogues with different but overlapping antitumour and tolerability profiles. Activity of the anthracyclines is related to topoisomerase II inhibition, which occurs as a result of anthracycline intercalation between adjacent DNA base pairs. Production of hydroxyl free radicals is associated with antitumour effects and toxicity to healthy tissues. Myocardial tissue is particularly susceptible to free radical damage. Development of tumour cell resistance to anthracyclines involves a number of mechanisms, including P-glycoprotein-mediated resistance. The classical dose-limiting adverse effects of this class of drugs are acute myelosuppression and cumulative dose-related cardiotoxicity. Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy is often irreversible and may lead to clinical congestive heart failure. Other toxicities of the anthracyclines, including stomatitis, nausea and vomiting, alopecia and 'radiation recall' reactions, are generally reversible. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity may be reduced or prevented by an administration schedule that produces low peak plasma drug concentrations. Administration of dexrazoxane also provides cardioprotection. Dose intensification of anthracyclines may partly overcome resistance but is associated with reduced tolerability. Liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin or daunorubicin alters the pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs. Increased distribution in tumours, prolonged circulation and reduced free drug concentrations in plasma may increase antitumour activity and improve the tolerability of the anthracyclines.

A risk-benefit assessment of anthracycline antibiotics in antineoplastic therapy

The anthracycline antibiotics comprise a group of cytotoxic compounds with wide-ranging activity against human malignancies. They are used extensively for curative, adjuvant and palliative therapy, both as single agents and in combination regimens. They produce a number of adverse effects, some of which are shared by other cytotoxic drugs. The most important adverse effect is cardiotoxicity, which is unique to this class of compounds. Strategies have been devised to circumvent these adverse effects, including the development of less toxic analogues, alterations in scheduling, the addition of cardioprotectant agents and methods of monitoring for cardiac abnormalities.

Iododoxorubicin in advanced breast cancer: a phase II evaluation of clinical activity, pharmacology and quality of life

Iododoxorubicin 80 mg m-2 i.v. was given 3 weekly for a maximum of six cycles as first-line chemotherapy to 14 evaluable women with metastatic breast cancer. The response rate was 14% (95% confidence intervals 4-40%); median time to progression was 3.5 months (range 0.7 to > 9.3) and median survival was 10.2 months (range 2.3 to > 20.4). Neutropenia was the main toxicity but was not associated with severe sepsis. Two patients had a significant (> 10%) but asymptomatic fall in cardiac ejection fraction; other toxicities were mild. Plasma pharmacokinetics was studied during the first cycle of treatment. Iododoxorubicin was extensively metabolised to iododoxorubicinol. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were both significantly correlated with the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for iododoxorubicin and the total AUC for iododoxorubicin and iododoxorubicinol. Quality of life (QOL), evaluated by self-report questionnaire and interview, showed little evidence of benefit in terms of physical symptom relief, level of activity, psychological symptoms or global evaluation of QOL during treatment. Iododoxorubicin is subjectively less toxic than standard anthracyclines, but at the dose and schedule used has limited activity in metastatic breast cancer, possibly because iododoxorubicinol is not clinically active.

Identification of a multidrug resistance modulator with clinical potential by analysis of synergistic activity in vitro, toxicity in vivo and growth delay in a solid human tumour xenograft

Circumvention of multidrug resistance in vitro by resistance modulators is well documented but their clinical use may be limited by effects on normal tissues. We have compared four resistance modifiers, both in terms of modulation of doxorubicin sensitivity in vitro and toxicity in vivo, in order to determine whether it is possible to select agents with clinical potential. Verapamil, D-verapamil and quinidine are all maximally active in the multidrug resistant cell line at about 7 microM and are not cytotoxic at this concentration. The tiapamil analogue Ro11-2933 is a highly potent resistance modulator such that at only 2 microM sensitization is greater than is seen with the other modulators at 7 microM. Since the ID50 concentration for Ro11-2933 is 17.7 microM (5-12-fold less than the other modifiers) we have used isobologram analysis to demonstrate that the interaction with doxorubicin is supra-additive and cannot be explained by additive toxicity. This method of analysis also revealed that when resistance modulation is related to the cytotoxicity of the modulator itself, all four modulators show comparable activity. On the other hand, measurement of the acute toxicity in mice of the modulators did reveal differences. The LD10 for verapamil (51 mg/kg) was about one third of that for quinidine (185 mg/kg) and this is consistent with the known maximum tolerated plasma levels in patients. Furthermore, whilst epirubicin alone was unable to reduce the growth rate of a multidrug resistant human tumour xenograft, the addition of quinidine, but not verapamil, at the maximum tolerated dose did do so. D-Verapamil was only about half as toxic as racemic verapamil and this too is consistent with clinical observations. The LD10 for Ro11-2933 (152 mg/kg) was comparable with that for quinidine. In the human tumour xenograft model maximal growth inhibition was observed with the combination of epirubicin and Ro11-2933 (45 mg/kg) and this degree of growth inhibition was comparable to that obtained with epirubicin alone in the drug sensitive xerografts. Ro11-2933 had no measurable effects on the plasma or tumour pharmacokinetics of epirubicin. These results suggest that it is possible to predict the clinical potential of a resistance modulator. Furthermore, Ro11-2933 is a promising agent for use in the clinic since maximal resistance modulation in vivo is observed at about one third of the LD10 dose.

The impact of pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials: critical evaluation and recommendations for future studies

Phase I studies requiring multiple dose escalation steps have led to the development of pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation (PGDE) strategies to expedite the conduct of early clinical trials. This article critically reviews PGDE strategies for a number of new anticancer agents including amphethinile, brequinar sodium, iodo-doxorubicin, the anthrapyrazoles (DuP 941, DuP 942 and DuP 937), rhizoxin, and aphidicolin glycinate. The benefits and problems associated with PGDE are examined. Recommendations are made for the optimal deployment of pharmacological information in future phase I studies.