Chapter 2 The synaptic populations of the fly's optic neuropil and their dynamic regulation: Parallels with the vertebrate retina

How the humble insect brain became a powerful experimental model system

In the 21st century, neurobiological studies focused on the insect brain are revealing unprecedented insight into the molecular, cellular, developmental, and circuit aspects of brain organization and function, notably in the genetic model system of Drosophila melanogaster. Underlying this accelerating progress in understanding the insect brain is a century-long history of ground breaking experimental investigation, methodological advance, and conceptual insight catalyzed by the integration of two emerging research fields, neuroscience and genetics. This review traces some of the key early steps in this remarkable historical scientific adventure of exploring the brain of "these apparently humble representatives of life".

Visual circuit assembly in Drosophila

Both insect and vertebrate visual circuits are organized into orderly arrays of columnar and layered synaptic units that correspond to the array of photoreceptors in the eye. Recent genetic studies in Drosophila have yielded insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms that pattern the layers and columns and establish specific connections within the synaptic units. A sequence of inductive events and complex cellular interactions coordinates the assembly of visual circuits. Photoreceptor-derived ligands, such as hedgehog and Jelly-Belly, induce target development and expression of specific adhesion molecules, which in turn serve as guidance cues for photoreceptor axons. Afferents are directed to specific layers by adhesive afferent-target interactions mediated by leucine-rich repeat proteins and cadherins, which are restricted spatially and/or modulated dynamically. Afferents are restricted to their topographically appropriate columns by repulsive interactions between afferents and by autocrine activin signaling. Finally, Dscam-mediated repulsive interactions between target neuron dendrites ensure appropriate combinations of postsynaptic elements at synapses. Essentially, all these Drosophila molecules have vertebrate homologs, some of which are known to carry out analogous functions. Thus, the studies of Drosophila visual circuit development would shed light on neural circuit assembly in general.

Immunocytochemical localization of synaptic proteins to photoreceptor synapses of Drosophila melanogaster

The location of proteins that contribute to synaptic function has been widely studied in vertebrate synapses, far more than at model synapses of the genetically manipulable fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila photoreceptor terminals have been extensively exploited to characterize the actions of synaptic genes, and their distinct and repetitive synaptic ultrastructure is anatomically well suited for such studies. Synaptic release sites include a bipartite T-bar ribbon, comprising a platform surmounting a pedestal. So far, little is known about the composition and precise location of proteins at either the T-bar ribbon or its associated synaptic organelles, knowledge of which is required to understand many details of synaptic function. We studied the localization of candidate proteins to pre- or postsynaptic organelles, by using immuno-electron microscopy with the pre-embedding method, after first validating immunolabeling by confocal microscopy. We used monoclonal antibodies against Bruchpilot, epidermal growth factor receptor pathway substrate clone 15 (EPS-15), and cysteine string protein (CSP), all raised against a fly head homogenate, as well as sea urchin kinesin (antibody SUK4) and Discs large (DLG). All these antibodies labeled distinct synaptic structures in photoreceptor terminals in the first optic neuropil, the lamina, as did rabbit anti-DPAK (Drosophila p21 activated kinase) and anti-Dynamin. Validating reports from light microscopy, immunoreactivity to Bruchpilot localized to the edge of the platform, and immunoreactivity to SUK4 localized to the pedestal of the T-bar ribbon. Anti-DLG recognized the photoreceptor head of capitate projections, invaginating organelles from surrounding glia. For synaptic vesicles, immunoreactivity to EPS-15 localized to sites of endocytosis, and anti-CSP labeled vesicles lying close to the T-bar ribbon. These results provide markers for synaptic sites, and a basis for further functional studies.

Design principles of insect and vertebrate visual systems

A century ago, Cajal noted striking similarities between the neural circuits that underlie vision in vertebrates and flies. Over the past few decades, structural and functional studies have provided strong support for Cajal's view. In parallel, genetic studies have revealed some common molecular mechanisms controlling development of vertebrate and fly visual systems and suggested that they share a common evolutionary origin. Here, we review these shared features, focusing on the first several layers-retina, optic tectum (superior colliculus), and lateral geniculate nucleus in vertebrates; and retina, lamina, and medulla in fly. We argue that vertebrate and fly visual circuits utilize common design principles and that taking advantage of this phylogenetic conservation will speed progress in elucidating both functional strategies and developmental mechanisms, as has already occurred in other areas of neurobiology ranging from electrical signaling and synaptic plasticity to neurogenesis and axon guidance.

Glutamate, GABA and acetylcholine signaling components in the lamina of the Drosophila visual system

Synaptic connections of neurons in the Drosophila lamina, the most peripheral synaptic region of the visual system, have been comprehensively described. Although the lamina has been used extensively as a model for the development and plasticity of synaptic connections, the neurotransmitters in these circuits are still poorly known. Thus, to unravel possible neurotransmitter circuits in the lamina of Drosophila we combined Gal4 driven green fluorescent protein in specific lamina neurons with antisera to γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamic acid decarboxylase, a GABA_B type of receptor, L-glutamate, a vesicular glutamate transporter (vGluT), ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors, choline acetyltransferase and a vesicular acetylcholine transporter. We suggest that acetylcholine may be used as a neurotransmitter in both L4 monopolar neurons and a previously unreported type of wide-field tangential neuron (Cha-Tan). GABA is the likely transmitter of centrifugal neurons C2 and C3 and GABA_B receptor immunoreactivity is seen on these neurons as well as the Cha-Tan neurons. Based on an rdl-Gal4 line, the ionotropic GABA_A receptor subunit RDL may be expressed by L4 neurons and a type of tangential neuron (rdl-Tan). Strong vGluT immunoreactivity was detected in α-processes of amacrine neurons and possibly in the large monopolar neurons L1 and L2. These neurons also express glutamate-like immunoreactivity. However, antisera to ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptors did not produce distinct immunosignals in the lamina. In summary, this paper describes novel features of two distinct types of tangential neurons in the Drosophila lamina and assigns putative neurotransmitters and some receptors to a few identified neuron types.

Gene expression patterns in primary neuronal clusters of the Drosophila embryonic brain

The brain of Drosophila is formed by approximately 100 lineages, each lineage being derived from a stem cell-like neuroblast that segregates from the procephalic neurectoderm of the early embryo. A neuroblast map has been established in great detail for the early embryo, and a suite of molecular markers has been defined for all neuroblasts included in this map [Urbach, R., Technau, G.M. (2003a) Molecular markers for identified neuroblasts in the developing brain of Drosophila. Development 130, 3621-3637]. However, the expression of these markers was not followed into later embryonic or larval stages, mainly due to the fact that anatomical landmarks to which expression patterns could be related had not been defined. Such markers, in the form of stereotyped clusters of neurons whose axons project along cohesive bundles ("primary axon bundles" or "PABs") are now available [Younossi-Hartenstein, A., Nguyen, B., Shy, D., Hartenstein, V. 2006. Embryonic origin of the Drosophila brain neuropile. J. Comp. Neurol. 497, 981-998]. In the present study we have mapped the expression of molecular markers in relationship to primary neuronal clusters and their PABs. The markers we analyzed include many of the genes involved in patterning of the brain along the anteroposterior axis (cephalic gap genes, segment polarity genes) and dorso-ventral axis (columnar patterning genes), as well as genes expressed in the dorsal protocerebrum and visual system (early eye genes). Our analysis represents an important step along the way to identify neuronal lineages of the mature brain with genes expressed in the early embryo in discrete neuroblasts. Furthermore, the analysis helped us to reconstruct the morphogenetic movements that transform the two-dimensional neuroblast layer of the early embryo into the three-dimensional larval brain and provides the basis for deeper understanding of how the embryonic brain develops.

Feedback network controls photoreceptor output at the layer of first visual synapses in Drosophila

At the layer of first visual synapses, information from photoreceptors is processed and transmitted towards the brain. In fly compound eye, output from photoreceptors (R1-R6) that share the same visual field is pooled and transmitted via histaminergic synapses to two classes of interneuron, large monopolar cells (LMCs) and amacrine cells (ACs). The interneurons also feed back to photoreceptor terminals via numerous ligand-gated synapses, yet the significance of these connections has remained a mystery. We investigated the role of feedback synapses by comparing intracellular responses of photoreceptors and LMCs in wild-type Drosophila and in synaptic mutants, to light and current pulses and to naturalistic light stimuli. The recordings were further subjected to rigorous statistical and information-theoretical analysis. We show that the feedback synapses form a negative feedback loop that controls the speed and amplitude of photoreceptor responses and hence the quality of the transmitted signals. These results highlight the benefits of feedback synapses for neural information processing, and suggest that similar coding strategies could be used in other nervous systems.

The organization of synaptic vesicles at tonically transmitting connections of locust visual interneurons

Large, second-order neurons of locust ocelli, or L-neurons, make some output connections that transmit small changes in membrane potential and can sustain transmission tonically. The synaptic connections are made from the axons of L-neurons in the lateral ocellar tracts, and are characterized by bar-shaped presynaptic densities and densely packed clouds of vesicles near to the cell membrane. A cloud of vesicles can extend much of the length of this synaptic zone, and there is no border between the vesicles that are associated with neighboring presynaptic densities. In some axons, presynaptic densities are associated with discrete small clusters of vesicles. Up to 6% of the volume of a length of axon in a synaptic zone can be occupied with a vesicle cloud, packed with 4.5 to 5.5 thousand vesicles per microm(3). Presynaptic densities vary in length, from less than 70 nm to 1.5 microm, with shorter presynaptic densities being most frequent. The distribution of vesicles around short presynaptic densities was indistinguishable from that around long presynaptic densities, and vesicles were distributed in a similar way right along the length of a presynaptic density. Within the cytoplasm, vesicles are homogeneously distributed within a cloud. We found no differences in the distribution of vesicles in clouds between locusts that had been dark-adapted and locusts that had been light-adapted before fixation.

Synaptic structure, distribution, and circuitry in the central nervous system of the locust and related insects

The Orthopteran central nervous system has proved a fertile substrate for combined morphological and physiological studies of identified neurons. Electron microscopy reveals two major types of synaptic contacts between nerve fibres: chemical synapses (which predominate) and electrotonic (gap) junctions. The chemical synapses are characterized by a structural asymmetry between the pre- and postsynaptic electron dense paramembranous structures. The postsynaptic paramembranous density defines the extent of a synaptic contact that varies according to synaptic type and location in single identified neurons. Synaptic bars are the most prominent presynaptic element at both monadic and dyadic (divergent) synapses. These are associated with small electron lucent synaptic vesicles in neurons that are cholinergic or glutamatergic (round vesicles) or GABAergic (pleomorphic vesicles). Dense core vesicles of different sizes are indicative of the presence of peptide or amine transmitters. Synapses are mostly found on small-diameter neuropilar branches and the number of synaptic contacts constituting a single physiological synapse ranges from a few tens to several thousand depending on the neurones involved. Some principles of synaptic circuitry can be deduced from the analysis of highly ordered brain neuropiles. With the light microscope, synaptic location can be inferred from the distribution of the presynaptic protein synapsin I. In the ventral nerve cord, identified neurons that are components of circuits subserving known behaviours, have been studied using electrophysiology in combination with light and electron microscopy and immunocytochemistry of neuroactive compounds. This has allowed the synaptic distribution of the major classes of neurone in the ventral nerve cord to be analysed within a functional context.

Neurotransmitter regulation of circadian structural changes in the fly's visual system

The visual system of the fly's compound eye undergoes a number of cyclical day/night changes that have a circadian basis. Such responses are seen in the synaptic terminals of the photoreceptors and in their large monopolar-cell interneurons in the first optic neuropile, or lamina. These changes include, in the photoreceptor terminals, rhythms in the numbers of synapses and the vertical migration of screening pigment; and, in the monopolar cells L1 and L2, a rhythm in the transients of the electroretinogram and in the cyclical swelling of L1 and L2 lamina axons, as well as of the epithelial glia that surround these. Some of these changes are seen in both the housefly and the fruit fly, but the time-course of such changes differs between the two species. Many of the changes are influenced by the injection of various transmitter candidates, in a direction that can be reconciled with the possibility of normal endogenous release of two substances, 5HT from the neurites of 5HT-immunoreactive neurons, and pigment dispersing factor peptide from the neurites of PDH cells. Consistent with this interpretation, the immunoreactive varicosities of PDH cells exhibit size changes attributable to their cyclical release of peptide, or to its cyclical synthesis and/or transport from the PDH cell somata. Thus, neurotransmitter substances not only have rapid electrophysiological actions in the optic lobe, but also longer-lasting, presumably indirect, neuromodulatory actions, which are manifest as structural changes among the lamina's neurons and synapses. These actions involve an interplay between aminergic and peptidergic systems, but the exact role and especially the site of action of each has still to be elucidated.

Regulated spacing of synapses and presynaptic active zones at larval neuromuscular junctions in different genotypes of the flies Drosophila and Sarcophaga

Synapses at larval neuromuscular junctions of the flies Drosophila melanogaster and Sarcophaga bullata are not distributed randomly. They have been studied in serial electron micrographs of two identified axons (axons 1 and 2) that innervate ventral longitudinal muscles 6 and 7 of the larval body wall. The following fly larvae were examined: axon 1--wild-type Sarcophaga and Drosophila and Drosophila mutants dunce(m14) and fasII(e76), a hypomorphic allele of the fasciclin II gene; and axon 2--drosophila wild-type, dunce(m14), and fasII(e76). These lines were selected to provide a wide range of nerve terminal phenotypes in which to study the distribution and spacing of synapses. Each terminal varicosity is applied closely to the underlying subsynaptic reticulum of the muscle fiber and has 15-40 synapses. Each synapse usually bears one or more active zones, characterized by dense bodies that are T-shaped in cross section; they are located at the presumed sites of transmitter release. The distribution of synapses was characterized from the center-to-center distance of each synapse to its nearest neighbor. The mean spacing between nearest-neighbor pairs ranged from 0.84 microm to 1.05 microm for axon 1, showing no significant difference regardless of genotype. The corresponding values for axon 2, 0.58 microm to 0.75 microm, were also statistically indistinguishable from one another in terminals of different genotype but differed significantly from the values for axon 1. Thus, the functional class of the axon provides a clear prediction of the spacing of its synapses, suggesting that spacing may be determined by the functional properties of transmission at the two types of terminals. Individual dense bodies were situated mostly at least 0.4 microm away from one another, suggesting that an interaction between neighboring active zones could prevent their final positions from being located more closely.

The effects of 20-hydroxyecdysone on the differentiation in vitro of cells from the eye imaginal disc from Drosophila melanogaster

We have examined the effects of the insect ecdysteroid, 20-hydroxyecdysone, on the differentiation of neuronal and non-neuronal elements in the developing adult visual system, using in vitro methods in Drosophila. We examined the differentiation of early neuronal markers in the presence and absence of 1 microgram/ml 20-hydroxyecdysone. Immunoreactivity to 22C10, a marker of an early neuronal antigen, as well as to the photoreceptor-specific antibody 24B10, suggests that differentiation of neuronal and photoreceptor antigens does not require 20-hydroxyecdysone. In eye-discs cultured from animals 5 hours after the white prepupa (P + 5), ommochrome pigmentation first appeared after 2 days in 1 microgram/ml 20-hydroxyecdysone, but cultures lacked pigmentation without 20-hydroxyecdysone. Our culture conditions failed to support the formation of the second screening pigment, drosopterins, even with 20-hydroxyecdysone. Eye discs from P + 5 also formed lenses and interommatidial bristles in culture when 20-hydroxyecdysone was added but not in cultures devoid of the hormone. The differentiation of synaptotagmin and the elongation of extending photoreceptor neurites from eye disc fragments both occur in the absence of 20-hydroxyecdysone in cultures, but adding the hormone increased average neurite length. The threshold for enhanced neurite length was less than 125 ng/ml 20-hydroxyecdysone. Eye-disc cultures also developed immunoreactivity to histamine, the photoreceptor transmitter, from synthesis not re-uptake, in both the presence and in the absence of 20-hydroxyecdysone. These findings suggest that photoreceptor axons may be able to release transmitter in vivo both when they grow into the optic lobe and during the subsequent events in synapse formation.

The effects of light reversals on photoreceptor synaptogenesis in the fly Musca domestica

The short-term influence of visual experience was studied in the first-order tetrad synapses of the first optic neuropil, or lamina, underlying the compound eye in the housefly (Musca domestica). We report the effects of single light reversals, in which flies reared in constant darkness were exposed to light or those in constant light were exposed to darkness, on this defined population of synapses. The synaptic population was characterized by quantitative electron microscopic methods using three parameters: (i) the number of synaptic contacts per photoreceptor terminal; (ii) the size of these synapses, given by the mean platform width of their presynaptic ribbons; and (iii) the proportion (up to approximately 20%) of small synapses-those having a ribbon platform less than 0.17 micron wide. The effects of light exposures in flies reared in constant darkness include decreased mean synaptic size and increased numbers of synapses. These effects are seen in flies of all ages (to 10 days). Long light exposures (2-6 h) are much less effective than short exposures (down to 20 s), with maximum effects obtained at 15 min (up to 45% more synapses). Small synapses are reasoned to be new junctions formed only recently; the decreased mean synaptic size and the increased number of synapses seen after short light exposures are both interpreted to result from a recent burst of synaptogenesis in the adult lamina. The effects of dark exposure in flies reared in constant light are the reciprocal of those seen in dark-reared flies exposed to light, but they are less pronounced. Although the function of such changes is not yet known, they may form part of the light adaptation mechanism of the photoreceptor, and occur along with a redistribution of other organelles involving membrane invaginations into its terminal. These changes occur against a background trend for control flies reared under constant conditions to have fewer, larger synapses with increasing age up to 10 days, an effect that is most pronounced in constant darkness, when synaptic number decreases by 21% and size increases by 13%.

Evidence for site selection during synaptogenesis: the surface distribution of synaptic sites in photoreceptor terminals of the files Musca and Drosophila

1. Photoreceptor terminals in the flies Musca domestica and Drosophila melanogaster have been reconstructed in three dimensions from serial EM to reveal the surface distributions of afferent tetrad synapses. 2. The terminals are cylindrical and surround two target cells; they have synaptic sites distributed along their length and around their circumference, except for a strip along the face that lies furthest away from the target cells. 3. Over their inner faces, the terminals have presynaptic sites that are distributed evenly. 4. The distribution of sites in maps plotted from reconstructed membrane surfaces was examined by quadrat analyses. The frequency of sites per quadrat division was not Poissonian, i.e. was non-random. Thus, some form of site selection must exist during synaptogenesis. 5. The sites were shown by variance ratio analysis to be regular (evenly dispersed, not clustered). This suggests that some form of interaction exists, so as to reduce the probability that a synapse will form close to an already existing synaptic site. 6. Distances between nearest-neighbour pairs of synapses had a closest minimum spacing of about 0.8 micron in Musca that was violated by about 5% of pairs, whereas the corresponding distances were about 0.2 micron shorter in Drosophila, which had 13% of pairs situated closer together than 0.8 micron. 7. During synaptogenesis, either initially in the pupa or later in the adult, the probability that a synapse will form is therefore effectively zero within these distances from an existing synaptic site, perhaps through an inhibitory influence exerted by the latter. The nearest-neighbour distances are normally distributed. 8. Unlike the distribution of presynaptic sites, the distribution of postsynaptic sites over the surfaces of the dendrites of the target cells is not even. Although not studied in detail, the corresponding nearest-neighbour distances are much smaller, as little as 0.1 micron. Thus the wider spacing seen between sites over the receptor terminals is a function of the presynaptic cells, and not of their postsynaptic partners, and implies the existence of interactions between synaptic sites.

Ultrastructure and quantification of synapses in the insect nervous system

Standard EM methods can be successfully used to reveal the various organelles of synaptic junctions in different insect species. The individual junctions of a synaptic class exhibit a high level of morphological stereotypy, but the study of serial sections is generally necessary to understand the different appearances of a junction's profiles when it is cut in different planes. Most synaptic profiles seen in single sections may then be attributed to one or a few morphological classes, not to many. Probably most central synapses are of the multiple-contact type, containing a number of postsynaptic elements, with the diversity of the combinations of these providing the major difference between particular synaptic junctions. The different profiles of a synapse when cut serially in oblique, non-canonical section planes provide the investigator with search images, prior knowledge of which is needed for a comprehensive identification of synaptic sites in single sections. The latter can be used to describe the synaptic organization of an unknown neuropile from the variety of synaptic contacts that form between different neurons. This requires that continuity be established between a postsynaptic dendrite and its parent axon, and that the position of the axon can then be used to identify the neuron of origin. Tracing between dendrite and axon can be undertaken either systematically in serial sections of a restricted region or by protracted searches of single sections. The number of synaptic profiles in a single section can be used to estimate the number of synaptic contacts, either in relative terms, as the number of profiles per section in different cells, or as the absolute number of synapses per cell. The latter requires use of correction formulae, taking into account the influence of section thickness and of the mean size of the synaptic junction on the number of synaptic profiles recorded in a particular section.

Information processing by graded-potential transmission through tonically active synapses

Many neurons use graded membrane-potential changes, instead of action potentials, to transmit information. Traditional synaptic models feature discontinuous transmitter release by presynaptic action potentials, but this is not true for synapses between graded-potential neurons. In addition to graded and continuous transmitter release, they have multiple active zones, ribbon formations and L-type Ca2+ channels. These differences are probably linked to the high rate of vesicle fusion required for continuous transmitter release. Early stages of sensory systems provide some of the best characterized graded-potential neurons, and recent work on these systems suggests that modification of synaptic transmission by adaptation is a powerful feature of graded synapses.

The early causal influence of cell size upon synaptic number: the mutant gigas of Drosophila

The number of synaptic contacts formed by a neuron is known to vary with its surface area. This could be because large neurons are able to establish more synaptic sites, or because those neurons that are able to establish more sites are subsequently able to enlarge. To test between these two possibilities clones of enlarged ommatidia were generated in the retina of the Drosophila mutant gigas, by mitotic recombination following gamma-irradiation in the third-instar larva. The numbers of afferent synaptic contacts formed by the photoreceptor terminals in the first optic neuropil, or lamina, were then counted in the adult. The terminals of mutant photoreceptors were also enlarged, but by varying degrees. The sizes of their profiles in single sections merged with the size distribution of terminals having a wild-type phenotype, lying outside the clone in the same lamina. A perimeter of 6.0 microns for the profiles of receptor terminal in cross section was established as a criterion for distinguishing between normal and mutant phenotypes. The mutant terminals had more presynaptic sites. Because only the gigas terminals are mutant and because they enlarged at a time long before synapse formation occurred in the lamina we may conclude that cell enlargement preceded elevated synaptic number. The increase in synaptic number roughly matched the increased membrane surface of the terminals, so as nearly to preserve a constant areal density of synaptic sites over a 5-fold range in synaptic frequency.

Cell recognition during synaptogenesis is revealed after temperature-shock-induced perturbations in the developing fly's optic lamina

Houseflies (Musca domestica) were exposed to pulses of heat (1 h) or cold (several hours) during early pupal life, and the effects were investigated on the development of the first optic neuropile, or lamina, of the visual system. The treatments were designed to perturb the cellular organization of the cartridges, the unit synaptic structures of the lamina, so as to provide novel synaptic opportunities among the normally fixed composition of these modules, thereby testing the preferences of their component cells during synaptogenesis. Various abnormalities were identified, but these were not always consistent between flies: retinal abnormalities included the loss and fusion of rhabdomeres, especially of the central cells of the ommatidium, whereas in the lamina low frequencies of abnormal cartridges were found. These included seven that were studied with serial sections, which instead of the normal pair of L1 and L2 monopolar interneurons had supernumerary cells of this type. The normal pairing of L1 and L2 at postsynaptic sites of receptor terminal tetrad synapses was preserved in these cases, the cells eschewing pairings of homologous L1/L2 or L2/L2 partners. This meant that more than one L1 could pair with a single L2 and vice versa, even at the same terminal, and appeared to do so opportunistically on the basis of proximity, with cells closer to each other pairing more frequently. Thus the cells behave during synaptogenesis as if they recognize other cells only as cell types (receptor, L1 or L2) and not as individual cells.

Daily and circadian rhythms of synaptic frequency in the first visual neuropile of the housefly's (Musca domestica L.) optic lobe

Photoreceptors of the fly's compound eye generally show no very obvious daily or circadian rhythms, a lack which prompted us to examine whether their function might be regulated not in the retina, but at the site of transmission in the first visual neuropile, or lamina. Here, photoreceptor terminals (R1-R6) are reciprocally interconnected with one class of lamina monopolar cell, L2: L2 receives input from R1-R6 at so-called tetrad synapses, and in turn is presynaptic to R1-R6 at feedback synapses. We have calculated the mean frequencies of these synaptic profiles in electron micrographs of single lamina sections. L2 feedback synapses were more numerous at night than during the day, whereas the number of tetrads showed only small modulations between day and night. These changes persisted amongst feedback synapses in flies held in constant darkness, and are thus circadian. In contrast to the slow modulations during a 24 h cycle, the number of L2 feedback synapses after 1 h light pulse in flies held in constant darkness showed no clear change, whereas it increased the number of tetrad profiles. These findings support the occurrence of cyclical daily and circadian changes amongst the two lamina synaptic populations, with tetrads showing rather weak modulations in frequency, but more pronounced responses to the light pulse than feedback synapses.

Cone synapses of a flat diffuse cone bipolar cell in the primate retina

A Golgi-stained flat diffuse cone bipolar cell from a vervet monkey's retina (Cercopithecus aethiops), contacting six cones, was serially sectioned for electron microscopy (EM) to determine the types of synapses it made with the cone pedicles. All the synapses were basal (flat) contacts. Their distribution and ultrastructural type were similar at each pedicle. Approximately half the synapses were definable as triad-associated and the rest were elsewhere on the cone pedicle base. Their ultrastructure is the same regardless of those positions. About 25 synapses were made with each cone. Thus this type (DB2 of Boycott & Wässle, 1991) of flat diffuse cone bipolar cell is in contact with six cones through about 150 synapses. At the eccentricity studied each cone pedicle probably makes 90-100 basal synapses with between three and four DB2 bipolar cells. This is between two and three times the number that are made with all the types of invaginating bipolar cells. A brief review of cone photoreceptor synapses with bipolar cells shows that, for those so far examined in the primate retina, the dichotomy into two types of bipolar cell invaginating (ribbon-related), with axons ending in the b-layer of the inner plexiform layer (IPL) (hence presumptive On-bipolars) and flat (basal synapses), with axons ending in the a-layer of the inner plexiform layer (hence presumptive Off-bipolars) is the rule. But other vertebrate retinae, including that of the cat, also have bipolar cells which vary from this pattern.