Combined MAO-inhibitor and tri- (tetra) cyclic antidepressant treatment in therapy resistant depression

Tranylcypromine Plus Amitriptyline for Electroconvulsive Therapy-Resistant Depression: A Long-Term Study

BACKGROUND

Few therapeutic options are available for patients with electroconvulsive therapy-resistant major depressive disorder (ECT-r MDD), leaving a substantial proportion of this population beyond treatment possibilities. The combination of monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants could be a potential strategy for managing ECT-r MDD, and the specific association of amitriptyline and tranylcypromine may offer additional tolerability advantages. Although promising, in our knowledge, no studies have examined until now the effectiveness of this combination in ECT-r MDD.

METHODS

We report a retrospective cohort of 31 patients with ECT-r MDD treated in an open-label fashion with the combination of amitriptyline and tranylcypromine.

RESULTS

Overall, 80.6% of the sample met response criteria at the end of the first 12 weeks of treatment. Seventy-six percent (19 of 25) of the responders were followed for a mean of 9.37 ± 3.86 years. During this follow-up period, none of the patients had a recurring depressive episode. The combination was well tolerated, whereas minor adverse effects were common, and no severe or life-threatening events were reported throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the combination tranylcypromine and amitriptyline is a potentially safe and effective candidate for future investigation in the treatment and long-term maintenance of ECT-r MDD.

Augmentation of phenelzine with aripiprazole and quetiapine in a treatment-resistant patient with psychotic unipolar depression: case report and literature review

Irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) antidepressants have significant efficacy in treatment-resistant unipolar depression, but in some instances patients may not achieve remission. Among the adjunctive and augmentation strategies, certain second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have approval for inadequate responders to antidepressant therapy, including aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and quetiapine, with lurasidone and the olanzapine/fluoxetine combination indicated for bipolar depression. Clinicians may eschew SGA options in part due to the limited literature on SGA-MAOI combinations, with only one published case involving aripiprazole, and none for olanzapine, lurasidone, or brexpiprazole. In addition to the limited publication history on SGA-MAOI treatment, clinicians may also be deterred by uncertainty regarding SGA mechanisms and the risk of serotonin syndrome or other adverse outcomes. This paper describes the case of a 54-year-old male with a history of psychotic unipolar depression treated with a combination of phenelzine, aripiprazole, and quetiapine, and reviews the 12 published cases of SGA-MAOI combination therapy with a focus on the pharmacological basis for serotonin syndrome, and the SGA mechanisms that should not be associated with a risk for this syndrome.

Tranylcypromine in mind (Part I): Review of pharmacology

It has been over 50 years since a review has focused exclusively on the monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor tranylcypromine (TCP). A new review has therefore been conducted for TCP in two parts which are written to be read preferably in close conjunction: Part I - pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, toxicology; and Part II - clinical studies with meta-analysis of controlled studies in depression, practice of TCP treatment, place in therapy. Pharmacological data of this review part I characterize TCP as an irreversible and nonselective MAO-A/B inhibitor at low therapeutic doses of 20mg/day with supplementary norepinephrine reuptake inhibition at higher doses of 40-60mg/day. Serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine, and trace amines, such as the "endogenous amphetamine" phenylethylamine, are increased in brain, which leads to changes in neuroplasticity by e.g. increased neurotrophic growth factors and translates to reduced stress-induced hypersecretion of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) and positive testing in animal studies of depression. TCP has a pharmacokinetic half-life (t_1/2) of only 2h which is considerably lower than for most other antidepressant drugs. However, a very long pharmacodynamic half-life of about one week is found because of the irreversible MAO inhibition. New studies show that, except for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2A6, no other drug metabolizing CYP-enzymes are inhibited by TCP at therapeutic doses which defines a low potential of pharmacokinetic interactions in the direction from TCP to other drugs. Insufficient information is available, however, for plasma concentrations of TCP influenced by comedication. More quantitative data are also needed for TCP metabolites such as p-hydroxytranylcypromine and N-acetyltranylcypromine. Pharmacodynamic drug interactions comprise for instance severe serotonin toxicity (SST) with serotonergic drugs and hypertensive crisis with indirect sympathomimetics. Because of the risk of severe food interaction, TCP treatment remains beset with the need for a mandatory tyramine-restricted diet. Toxicity in overdose is similar to amitriptyline and imipramine according to the distance of therapeutic to toxic doses. In conclusion, TCP is characterized by an exceptional pharmacology which is different to most other antidepressant drugs, and a more special evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety may therefore be needed.

Drug treatment of depression in the 2000s: An overview of achievements in the last 10 years and future possibilities

During the past 10 years our knowledge about the pharmacotherapy of depression has been consolidated, and a variety of very interesting new compounds launched onto the market. The pipeline of the pharmaceutical industry is still filled with an assortment of new developments and very promising new approaches towards the pharmacotherapy of depressive disorders. Future pharmacological treatments of depression will not only enhance serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission: other systems, such as the melatonergic receptor system and the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, are also the targets of newly developed and upcoming substances with putative antidepressant effects. The main advantages of the currently available newer pharmacotherapeutic options are the broadening of the spectrum of possible antidepressant treatments, which is of particular importance for the growing number of patients suffering from difficult-to-treat depression, and a far better tolerability profile in comparison to older compounds such as tricyclic antidepressants. Unresolved issues are the unacceptably high rate of non-responsiveness during antidepressant treatment, a latency of sometimes several weeks until clinical improvement and remission can be achieved, and a variety of possible side effects also present during treatment with modern compounds. This review mainly presents the development of antidepressant pharmacotherapies during the past 10 years, together with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information and a comparison of different pharmacological treatment principles evaluated in randomized controlled clinical trials. In addition, new pharmacological strategies that are not yet available on the market and strategies currently under development are reviewed in detail. The study of new treatment options is of major importance to provide better strategies for the clinical management of depression in the future, and is thus also of great socio-economic importance.

Combined antidepressants: clinical experience

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature on the use of combinations of antidepressive agents.

METHOD

Literature searches were undertaken and reviewed on the use of combinations of antidepressants.

RESULTS

Data sources included surveys, analyses of prescription records, decision algorithms, clinical reports, and studies comparing the monotherapy with combination therapy. More recent surveys recommend combining different selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), an SSRI plus bupropion or dual action antidepressants plus an SSRI. Decision algorithms recommend an SSRI plus tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) and more recently bupropion plus venlafaxine or mirtazapine. Few controlled clinical trials comparing the combined therapy with monotherapy have been conducted. Beneficial effects have been reported with combinations of TCAs plus mianserin or SSRIs plus mirtazapine.

CONCLUSION

Adding or combining antidepressant medications has advantages for the speed of onset and maintaining the existing response. More rigorous clinical trials comparing combination therapy with monotherapy and for the development of rational treatment guidelines are required.

Therapy of treatment resistant depression: focus on the management of TRD with atypical antipsychotics

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) represents a significant challenge for physicians. About one third of patients with major depressive disorder fail to experience sufficient symptom improvement despite adequate treatment. Despite this high occurrence of TRD there was no general consensus on diagnosis criteria for TRD until 1997 when researchers proposed a model of defining and staging TRD. In 1999, others defined operational criteria for the definition of TRD. Treatment of TRD is commonly separated into pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods. This review gives a short overview of these two methods. The nonpharmacologic methods include psychotherapy, electroconvulsive therapy, and vagus nerve stimulation. Pharmacologic methods include switching to another antidepressant monotherapy, and augmentation or combination with two or more antidepressants or other agents. This review especially focuses on the augmentation of the antidepressant therapy with atypical antipsychotics.

Switch in treatment from tricyclic antidepressants to moclobemide: a new generation monoamine oxidase inhibitor

The combination of classic monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and tricyclic antidepressant drugs (TCAs) has been associated with a variety of adverse events. A switch in treatment from TCAs to moclobemide, a reversible and selective inhibitor of MAO-A, was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. Two groups of 12 subjects were treated with either amitriptyline (75 mg/day) or clomipramine (100 mg/day) until steady-state conditions had been attained (14 days). Treatment with the TCAs was discontinued abruptly and switched to either a therapeutic dose regimen of moclobemide (300 mg/day) or placebo. The tolerability and safety pattern did not reveal any clinically relevant differences between moclobemide and placebo recipients, nor was there any sign of a pharmacokinetic interaction between the TCAs and moclobemide. In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that therapeutic doses of moclobemide up to 300 mg daily can be given 24 hours after the last dose of treatment with either amitriptyline or clomipramine without major risks.

Refractory depression: a review with particular reference to the use of lithium augmentation

The literature on pharmacological treatments of refractory depression is reviewed, with particular reference to problems in definition of treatment resistance, criteria for adequacy of treatment and the lack of controlled trial evidence for many putative treatment approaches. The results of a placebo-controlled trial of lithium augmentation of patients failing to respond to fluoxetine or lofepramine are presented. The data from this trial (particularly when analysed in combination with that in earlier, smaller published studies) establish the efficacy of lithium augmentation but illustrate the difficulty of achieving adequate plasma lithium levels and the high rate of partial response to continued antidepressant alone.

Tranylcypromine does not enhance the effects of amitriptyline on 5-HT2 receptors in rat cerebral cortex

The combination of amitriptyline (a tricyclic antidepressant) and tranylcypromine (a monoamine oxidase inhibitor) has been reported to be effective for treatment of refractory depressed patients. In the study reported here, this drug combination was compared with amitriptyline administered alone on the number and affinity of 5-HT2 receptors in rat brain. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were given vehicle (distilled water), amitriptyline (3.5 mg/kg/day), or tranylcypromine and amitriptyline (0.5 and 3.5 mg/kg/day, respectively) in combination subcutaneously via osmotic minipumps for 4, 10, or 28 days. A membrane fraction prepared from whole cortex was employed for studying binding to 5-HT2 receptors ([3H]ketanserin as the radioligand). The combination of amitriptyline and tranylcypromine produced a small but significantly greater down-regulation (decrease in number) of 5-HT2 sites than did amitriptyline alone after 10 days of administration; at 4 and 28 days, both amitriptyline and the drug combination had produced down-regulation, but there was not a significant difference between the two treatments. These data suggest that the antidepressant efficacy observed with this combination is not likely due to an enhanced effect on 5-HT2 receptors.