LHRH agonist treatment of breast cancer and gynecological malignancies: a review

Conventional and new proposals of GnRH therapy for ovarian, breast, and prostatic cancers

For many years, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs have been used to treat androgen or estrogen-dependent tumors. However, emerging evidence shows that the GnRH receptor (GnRH-R) is overexpressed in several cancer cells, including ovarian, endometrial, and prostate cancer cells, suggesting that GnRH analogs could exert direct antitumoral actions in tumoral tissues that express GnRH-R. Another recent approach based on this knowledge was the use of GnRH peptides for developing specific targeted therapies, improving the delivery and accumulation of drugs in tumoral cells, and decreasing most side effects of current treatments. In this review, we discuss the conventional uses of GnRH analogs, together with the recent advances in GnRH-based drug delivery for ovarian, breast, and prostatic cancer cells.

Ovarian Ablation for Premenopausal Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Update

Ovarian ablation is the oldest form of systemic treatment of breast cancer and consists of removal of the main source of estrogen biosynthesis in premenopausal women: Over the last century several different means of stopping ovarian function have been studied: surgical oophorectomy, ovarian irradiation, and more recently, chemical castration by gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog therapy. In unselected patients the response rate to ovarian ablation is of about 35% but the likelihood of response is considerably higher for patients with hormonal receptor-positive tumors, the therapy being most effective in women who are actively menstruating. In spite of this evidence, the role of ovarian ablation in the management of early-stage breast cancer still remains controversial. Here we review current evidence supporting the value of this ablative procedure as an adjuvant and update ongoing clinical research to refine our knowledge about its use.

Endocrine therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer

First-line endocrine therapy by estrogen antagonism or suppression of estrogen achieves objective responses (ORs) and clinical benefit (CB) in around 30% and 50% of estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients, respectively. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the most effective treatment in previously untreated postmenopausal women. Tamoxifen is an effective alternative. The optimal endocrine therapy on relapse remains uncertain. Tamoxifen and fulvestrant achieve CB in around 50% of patients and ORs of 10%. CB of exemestane after nonsteroidal AIs is 30% to 50% but ORs are rare. Targeted agents (eg, everolimus) plus endocrine therapy are likely to become increasingly important in overcoming endocrine resistance.

Receptor targeted polymers, dendrimers, liposomes: which nanocarrier is the most efficient for tumor-specific treatment and imaging?

To compare the influence of different characteristics of nanocarriers on the efficacy of chemotherapy and imaging, we designed, characterized, and evaluated three widely used nanocarriers: linear polymer, dendrimer and liposome in vitro and in vivo. These nanocarriers delivered the same anticancer drug (paclitaxel) and/or imaging agent (Cy5.5). A synthetic analog of LHRH peptide targeted to receptors overexpressed on the membrane of cancer cells was attached to the nanocarriers as a tumor targeting moiety. Significant differences were found between various studied non-targeted carriers in their cellular internalization, cytotoxicity, tumor and organ distribution and anticancer efficacy. LHRH peptide substantially enhanced intratumoral accumulation and anticancer efficacy of all delivery systems and minimized their adverse side effects. For the first time, the present study revealed that the targeting of nanocarriers to tumor-specific receptors minimizes the influence of the architecture, composition, size and molecular mass of nanocarriers on the efficacy of imaging and cancer treatment.

LH-RH agonists offer very good protection against the adverse gynaecological effects induced by tamoxifen

This study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists in protecting premenopausal patients against the adverse gynaecological effects induced by tamoxifen. Between January 1998 and January 2000, 85 premenopausal breast cancer patients were included in this prospective study. All were to receive LH-RH agonists and tamoxifen for a minimum of two years. All patients underwent a pretreatment gynaecological evaluation and annual follow-up. Bone density was also measured at the start of treatment and then after 2, 3 and 4 years. Pretreatment evaluation revealed 2 polyps. At one and two years of follow-up, no abnormal symptoms were noted and echographic findings were normal. At three years of follow-up, a polyp associated with adnexal masses was discovered. Histology revealed ovarian and endometrial metastases of infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma. Bone density evaluation after 2, 3 and 4 years of treatment showed no significant bone loss. LH-RH agonists offer safe protection against the gynaecological side-effects of tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer patients.

Developments in drug delivery: implications for cancer care

Changes in drug delivery as well as new drug development have impacted on cancer care in the past twenty years. Several modified release chemicals now have a role in cancer care, and new routes of drug delivery have been established as part of standard care. A range of strategies has been investigated to enhance anti-tumor selectivity of drugs including antibodies, liposomes and carrier molecules homing or activated in the environment of tumors. Fixed drug combinations are also used in cancer supportive care, and may find use in a range of settings.

Oestrogen receptor downregulation: an opportunity for extending the window of endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Advanced breast cancer is largely incurable and current treatment modalities are aimed towards restricting tumour growth, prolonging survival, palliating symptoms and maintaining quality of life (QoL). The development of breast cancer is strongly influenced by endogenous oestrogens (and other growth factors), leading to a strong focus on the development of antioestrogenic compounds for the treatment of hormone-sensitive advanced disease.

DESIGN

This is a review of current endocrine therapies available for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, examining the likely impact of newer agents on treatment strategies.

RESULTS

In postmenopausal women, current treatment options include tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) and megestrol acetate. Fulvestrant ('Faslodex') is a new, well-tolerated, oestrogen receptor antagonist that has no known agonist effect and is at least as effective as the AI anastrozole for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic or advanced breast cancer who have progressed on prior endocrine therapy. Fulvestrant maintains QoL throughout successful treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Fulvestrant represents a new treatment option for postmenopausal women with advanced disease. New agents that appear to lack cross-resistance with existing treatments may be used to extend the time period during which endocrine therapy may be employed before the need for cytotoxic chemotherapy.

In vitro effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue on cancer cell sensitivity to cis-platinum

Six endometrial cancer cell lines (Ishikawa, EIIL, HEC1A, 6, 50 and 59), one breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) and two ovarian cancer cell lines (OVHS-1, HRA) were treated for 24 or 168 h with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue, Buserelin acetate, and the cellular growth profile was studied. All these cell lines except for the HRA line had positive GnRH receptor mRNA expression detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. GnRHa suppressed cell growth after 168 h of exposure, but not after 24 h. Suppression of cell growth by the exposure to cis-platinum (CDDP, 10 nM for 24 h) was significantly increased in the presence of GnRHa for 168 h. The mechanism of this growth inhibition was tested by examining both RNA components of human telomerase (hTR) expression and telomerase activity. The results showed that GnRHa inhibits telomerase activity without altering the RNA component of telomerase expression. The present data suggest that GnRH analogue may modulate endometrial, breast and ovarian cancer cell growth through modifying the telomerase activity. Since GnRHa increased the cytotoxic effects of CDDP and GnRHa is a compound of high patient compliance, the value of GnRHa as a tumor sensitizer to CDDP should be further tested in clinical trials.