A theoretical study of the effect of structural variations on the biochemical reactivity of yeast tRNAPhe and yeast tRNAAsp

A highly sensitive probe for guanine N7 in folded structures of RNA: application to tRNA(Phe) and Tetrahymena group I intron

A nickel complex has been shown to promote conformation-specific oxidation of guanosine in polynucleotide RNA. In all cases, reaction was strictly dependent on the solvent exposure and surface properties of guanine N7. Modification of native tRNA(Phe) (yeast) was detected at G18, G19, G20, and Gm34 and concurred with predictions based on its crystal structure. Additional guanine derivatives became exposed to oxidation only after the tRNA unfolded in the absence of Mg2+. Reaction of the Tetrahymena group I intron RNA (L-21 ScaI) also compared favorably to its three-dimensional model by appropriately identifying guanosine residues in hairpin loops, duplex termini, and the essential cofactor binding site. These results complemented prior data generated by hydroxyl radical, and in combination they served to distinguish the solvent accessibility of sugar backbone and base positions in guanosine residues. Most importantly, this nickel complex exhibited greater selectivity than either dimethyl sulfate or RNase T1 for characterizing tRNA(Phe) and intron RNA.

Structural elements in RNA

This chapter describes the RNA structural characteristics that have emerged so far. Folded RNA molecules are stabilized by a variety of interactions, the most prevalent of which are stacking and hydrogen bonding between bases. Many interactions among backbone atoms also occur in the structure of tRNA, although they are often ignored when considering RNA structure because they are not as well-characterized as interactions among bases. Backbone interactions include hydrogen bonding and the stacking of sugar or phosphate groups with bases or with other sugar and phosphate groups. The interactions found in a three-dimensional RNA structure can be divided into two categories: secondary interactions and tertiary interactions. This division is useful for several reasons. Secondary structures are routinely determined by a combination of techniques discussed in chapter, whereas tertiary interactions are more difficult to determine. Computer algorithms that generate RNA structures can search completely through possible secondary structures, but the inclusion of tertiary interactions makes a complete search of possible structures impractical for RNA molecules even as small as tRNA. The division of RNA structure into building blocks consisting of secondary or tertiary interactions makes it easier to describe RNA structures. In those cases in which RNA studies are incomplete, the studies of DNA are described with the rationalization that RNA structures may be analogous to DNA structures, or that the techniques used to study DNA could be applied to the analogous RNA structures. The chapter focuses on the aspects of RNA structure that affect the three-dimensional shape of RNA and that affect its ability to interact with other molecules.

Reaction of nucleic acid bases with alpha-acetylenic esters. Part IV. Preparation of an alkylating derivative of tRNA(Phe) by conformation-specific chemical modification

The reaction of yeast tRNA(Phe) with methyl chlorotetrolate, ClCH2-C identical to C-COOCH3, was studied. This reagent converts adenine and cytosine rings into derivatives in which an additional heterocycle bearing the alkylating chloromethyl group is fused to the original base; these derivatives can exist in two isomeric forms. Modified nucleosides of this type can be easily identified by reverse-phase HPLC. It was found that under native conditions, the modification of tRNA involves the anticodon loop and the 3'-end. The isomers of adenine derivatives formed in the anticodon loop were different from those formed in the 3'-end. It is suggested that the isomeric structure of the derivatives is related to the fine conformational differences between these two regions of tRNA(Phe). Methyl chlorotetrolate could thus be used as a conformational probe of single-stranded nucleic acids. Preliminary assays showed that modified tRNA(Phe) binds irreversibly to yeast phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase.

Probing the structure of RNAs in solution

During these last years, a powerful methodology has been developed to study the secondary and tertiary structure of RNA molecules either free or engaged in complex with proteins. This method allows to test the reactivity of every nucleotide towards chemical or enzymatic probes. The detection of the modified nucleotides and RNase cleavages can be conducted by two different paths which are oriented both by the length of the studied RNA and by the nature of the probes used. The first one uses end-labeled RNA molecule and allows to detect only scissions in the RNA chain. The second approach is based on primer extension by reverse transcriptase and detects stops of transcription at modified or cleaved nucleotides. The synthesized cDNA fragments are then sized by electrophoresis on polyacrylamide:urea gels. In this paper, the various structure probes used so far are described, and their utilization is discussed.

Comparison of the tertiary structure of yeast tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Phe) in solution. Chemical modification study of the bases

A comparative study of the solution structures of yeast tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Phe) was undertaken with chemical reagents as structural probes. The reactivity of N-7 positions in guanine and adenine residues was assayed with dimethylsulphate and diethyl-pyrocarbonate, respectively, and that of the N-3 position in cytosine residues with dimethylsulphate. Experiments involved statistical modifications of end-labelled tRNAs, followed by splitting at modified positions. The resulting end-labelled oligonucleotides were resolved on polyacrylamide sequencing gels and analysed by autoradiography. Three different experimental conditions were used to follow the progressive denaturation of the two tRNAs. Experiments were done in parallel on tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Phe) to enable comparison between the two solution structures and to correlate the results with the crystalline conformations of both molecules. Structural differences were detected for G4, G45, G71 and A21: G4 and A21 are reactive in tRNA(Asp) and protected in tRNA(Phe), while G45 and G71 are protected in tRNA(Asp) and reactive in tRNA(Phe). For the N-7 atom of A21, the different reactivity is correlated with the variable variable loop structures in the two tRNAs; in the case of G45 the results are explained by a different stacking of A9 between G45 and residue 46. For G4 and G71, the differential reactivities are linked to a different stacking in both tRNAs. This observation is of general significance for helical stems. If the previous results could be fully explained by the crystal structures, unexpected similarities in solution were found for N-3 alkylation of C56 in the T-loop, which according to crystallography should be reactive in tRNA(Asp). The apparent discrepancy is due to conformational differences between crystalline and solution tRNA(Asp) at the level of the D and T-loop contacts, linked to long-distance effects induced by the quasi-self-complementary anticodon GUC, which favour duplex formation within the crystal, contrarily to solution conditions where the tRNA is essentially in its free state.