Effects of stimulation of phrenic afferent fibers on medullary respiratory neurons in cat

Dyspnea

The clinical term dyspnea (a.k.a. breathlessness or shortness of breath) encompasses at least three qualitatively distinct sensations that warn of threats to breathing: air hunger, effort to breathe, and chest tightness. Air hunger is a primal homeostatic warning signal of insufficient alveolar ventilation that can produce fear and anxiety and severely impacts the lives of patients with cardiopulmonary, neuromuscular, psychological, and end-stage disease. The sense of effort to breathe informs of increased respiratory muscle activity and warns of potential impediments to breathing. Most frequently associated with bronchoconstriction, chest tightness may warn of airway inflammation and constriction through activation of airway sensory nerves. This chapter reviews human and functional brain imaging studies with comparison to pertinent neurorespiratory studies in animals to propose the interoceptive networks underlying each sensation. The neural origins of their distinct sensory and affective dimensions are discussed, and areas for future research are proposed. Despite dyspnea's clinical prevalence and impact, management of dyspnea languishes decades behind the treatment of pain. The neurophysiological bases of current therapeutic approaches are reviewed; however, a better understanding of the neural mechanisms of dyspnea may lead to development of novel therapies and improved patient care.

Human intersegmental reflexes from intercostal afferents to scalene muscles

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? The aim was to determine whether specific reflex connections operate between intercostal afferents and the scalene muscles in humans, and whether these connections operate after a clinically complete cervical spinal cord injury. What is the main finding and its importance? This is the first description of a short-latency inhibitory reflex connection between intercostal afferents from intercostal spaces to the scalene muscles in able-bodied participants. We suggest that this reflex is mediated by large-diameter afferents. This intercostal-to-scalene inhibitory reflex is absent after cervical spinal cord injury and may provide a way to monitor the progress of the injury. Short-latency intersegmental reflexes have been described for various respiratory muscles in animals. In humans, however, only short-latency reflex responses to phrenic nerve stimulation have been described. Here, we examined the reflex connections between intercostal afferents and scalene muscles in humans. Surface EMG recordings were made from scalene muscles bilaterally, in seven able-bodied participants and seven participants with motor- and sensory-complete cervical spinal cord injury (median 32 years postinjury, range 5 months to 44 years). We recorded the reflex responses produced by stimulation of the eighth or tenth left intercostal nerve. A short-latency (∼38 ms) inhibitory reflex was evident in able-bodied participants, in ipsilateral and contralateral scalene muscles. This bilateral intersegmental inhibitory reflex occurred in 46% of recordings at low stimulus intensities (at three times motor threshold). It was more frequent (in 75-85% of recordings) at higher stimulus intensities (six and nine times motor threshold), but onset latency (38 ± 9 ms, mean ± SD) and the size of inhibition (23 ± 10%) did not change with stimulus intensity. The reflex was absent in all participants with spinal cord injury. As the intercostal-to-scalene reflex did not increase with larger stimulus intensities, it is likely to be mediated by large-diameter intercostal muscle afferents. This is the first demonstration of an intercostal-to-scalene reflex. As the reflex requires intact spinal connections, it may be a useful marker for recovery of thoracic or cervical spinal injury.

Phrenic nerve afferents elicited cord dorsum potential in the cat cervical spinal cord

BACKGROUND

The diaphragm has sensory innervation from mechanoreceptors with myelinated axons entering the spinal cord via the phrenic nerve that project to the thalamus and somatosensory cortex. It was hypothesized that phrenic nerve afferent (PnA) projection to the central nervous system is via the spinal dorsal column pathway.

RESULTS

A single N1 peak of the CDP was found in the C4 and C7 spinal segments. Three peaks (N1, N2, and N3) were found in the C5 and C6 segments. No CDP was recorded at C8 dorsal spinal cord surface in cats.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate PnA activation of neurons in the cervical spinal cord. Three populations of myelinated PnA (Group I, Group II, and Group III) enter the cat's cervical spinal segments that supply the phrenic nerve.

Reflex inhibition of human inspiratory muscles in response to contralateral phrenic nerve stimulation

In animals, high-intensity unilateral stimulation of the phrenic nerve results in short-latency inhibition of phrenic and intercostal nerve activity bilaterally. This study provides the first demonstration in human subjects of a short-latency inhibitory response in the contralateral scalene, parasternal intercostal and diaphragm muscles to single stimuli delivered at cervical level to the phrenic nerve. Electromyographic (EMG) responses were recorded with intramuscular and surface electrodes. An inhibitory response with an onset latency of approximately 35 ms followed by a long-latency excitatory response at approximately 100 ms were observed in the three inspiratory muscles. The inhibition was evident in single trials, averaged EMG, histograms of the discharge of single motor units, and even when the phrenic nerve stimulus intensity was relatively low. Thus, the inhibition may be mediated by large-diameter muscle afferents. The latency of this potent inhibitory response to contralateral phrenic nerve stimulation is too long to be mediated via a simple spinal circuit and may involve a brainstem projection.

Reflex inhibition of canine inspiratory intercostals by diaphragmatic tension receptors

1. Electrical stimulation of phrenic afferent fibres in the dog elicits a reflex inhibition of efferent activity to the inspiratory intercostal muscles. However, electrical stimulation has a poor selectivity, so the sensory receptors responsible for this inhibition were not identified. 2. In the present studies, cranial forces were applied during spontaneous inspiration to the abdominal surface of the central, tendinous portion of the canine diaphragm to activate tension mechanoreceptors in the muscle. Vagal afferent inputs were eliminated by vagotomy. 3. The application of force to the central tendon caused a graded, reflex reduction in inspiratory intercostal activity, especially in external intercostal activity. This reduction was commonly associated with a decrease in inspiratory duration and was invariably attenuated after section of the cervical dorsal roots. 4. In contrast, no change in inspiratory intercostal activity was seen when high frequency mechanical vibration was applied to the central tendon to stimulate diaphragmatic muscle spindles. 5. These observations provide strong evidence that tension receptors in the diaphragm, but not muscle spindles, induce reflex inhibition of inspiratory intercostal activity. The expression of this reflex probably involves supraspinal structures.

Effects of stimulation of phrenic afferents on cervical respiratory interneurones and phrenic motoneurones in cats

1. In ten decerebrate, paralysed and ventilated cats, we tested the hypothesis that cervical (C5) respiratory interneurones mediate inhibition of phrenic motoneurone activity resulting from single shocks to the phrenic nerve. 2. Stimulus intensities sufficient to activate all afferents elicited (latency, 4.0 +/- 0.9 ms, mean +/- S.D.) a graded suppression of ipsilateral, but not contralateral (five of seven cats) phrenic nerve activity lasting, in six of seven cats, more than 70 ms and interrupted by a brief (approximately 6-18 ms duration) excitation at latencies between 7 and 30 ms. 3. In twenty-five ipsilateral motoneurones, peristimulus time average of the membrane potentials (-61 +/- 10 mV) showed no effect in eleven; of the fourteen that responded, ten had initial EPSPs (latency, 17.6 +/- 3.0 ms) and four initial IPSPs (latencies, 2.25-4.3 ms). Only one motoneurone had both. No responses with latencies > 60 ms were observed. 4. Peristimulus time averages of extracellular activity of thirty ipsilateral interneurones, twenty-five firing in inspiration (I) and five in expiration (E), showed diverse responses. The initial response of I interneurones was an excitation in eleven, a suppression of activity in nine, and no response in five. Latencies of excitations ranged from 2 to 36.5 ms (median, 14 ms) with durations ranging from 2 to 7 ms (mean, 4.4 +/- 1.6 ms). Latencies of suppression of activity ranged from 2 to 29 ms (median, 10 ms). Two E interneurones were excited (latencies, 11 and 15 ms; durations, 3.5 and 2 ms), two inhibited (latencies, 2 and 12 ms; durations, > 40 and 17 ms, respectively), and one did not respond. 5. In nine interneurones (seven I, two E), peristimulus time averages of the membrane potentials (mean, -62 +/- 14 mV) revealed no effect on three (all I). Of the six that responded, four (three I) had initial IPSPs, two (one I, one E) initial EPSPs. EPSPs had latencies of 11.5 (I interneurone) and 22 ms (E interneurone); the latencies of the IPSPs were 2.75, 3.20, and 2.3 ms for the I interneurones and 15.9 ms for the E interneurone). No responses with latencies > 30 ms were observed. 6. The diverse responses of cervical respiratory interneurones indicates that they do not mediate the prolonged suppression of ipsilateral phrenic activity elicited by stimulation of phrenic afferents. The suppression may result from activation of normally quiescent inhibitory interneurones or from presynaptic inhibition.

Ventilatory effects of the interaction between phrenic and limb muscle afferents

We studied the effects on ventilation and ventilatory muscle activation of stimulation of the central ends of the left phrenic and gastrocnemius nerves separately and concurrently in 10 spontaneously breathing, alpha-chloralose anaesthetized dogs. The nerves were stimulated for 1 min, at a frequency of 40 Hz and pulse duration of 1 ms. The phrenic nerve was stimulated at 20 and 40 times twitch threshold (TT). During these stimulation periods ventilation increased by 39% and 79% of control values, respectively. The gastrocnemius nerve was stimulated at 20 times TT. This produced a 90% increase in ventilation. Stimulation of either nerve resulted in increases in the activity of the right diaphragm, parasternal intercostal and alae nasi muscles comparable in magnitude to the increase in tidal volume. The activities of the genioglossus and transversus abdominis muscle increased to a much greater extent than did the other muscles under all conditions. In contrast, triangularis sterni activity remained unchanged during stimulation of either nerve. The phrenic nerve was then stimulated at 40 times TT for 1 min with superimposed gastrocnemius nerve stimulation (20 times TT) during the last 30 s. Ventilation had risen by 66% after 30 s of phrenic nerve stimulation. With the addition of gastrocnemius nerve stimulation, ventilation rose by a further 84% for a total increase of 150% of the control value. Mathematical summation of the responses to individual nerve stimulation at these intensities predicted a 156% increase in ventilation. Similar degrees of summation were found with respect to respiratory muscle activation. We conclude that the interaction between phrenic and limb muscle (gastrocnemius) afferent is additive with respect to their effects on ventilation.

Phrenic afferents and ventilatory control

It has been understood since the late 1800s that the diaphragm has significant sensory innervation. The role of phrenic afferents in the control of breathing, however, has been obscure. The phrenic nerve has been shown to contain a full array of afferent fibers. However, proprioceptive (group 1 fibers) afferents are few compared to postural muscles or the intercostals. The diaphragm, unlike the inspiratory intercostal muscles, has a small complement of spindle afferents and not all of these spindles are supplied with fusorial fibers. Reduced spindle afferents under gamma control help to explain previous studies of the diaphragm that have failed to reveal autogenic facilitation, that is, a reflex-mediated increase in drive during inspiratory loading. Nevertheless, some clinical studies have revealed increased activation of the diaphragm when its length is reduced. Group 1 fibers, which are predominantly tendon organ afferents in the diaphragm, have been shown to have a phasic inhibitory function. A reduction in this inhibition brought about by a reduction in diaphragmatic length during lung inflation may explain the increased diaphragmatic activation reported in clinical studies. Phrenic afferents have been shown to have multiple spinal and supraspinal projections. Recent studies have explored the ventilatory effects of thin fiber afferents (group III and IV fibers) in the phrenic nerve. Stimulation of these afferents has been shown both to inhibit and excite ventilation. These afferents arise from polymodal receptors that respond to both mechanical and chemical stimulation. Activation of these receptors may occur in a variety of conditions and the ventilatory response may be determined by the specific receptor activated.

Phrenic-to-phrenic inhibition and excitation in spinal cats

In decerebrate, C2-spinalized cats, stimulation of the C6-phrenic root produces a weak activation of phrenic motoneurons in the adjacent C5 segment in a few animals (23%). When phrenic motoneurons are electrically excited by testing stimulation applied to the spinal cord or internal intercostal nerve, the evoked responses recorded in a cervical phrenic root are partly inhibited by conditioning stimulation applied to another ipsilateral or contralateral cervical phrenic root. We therefore conclude that phrenic fibers exert both inhibitory and excitatory effects on adjacent phrenic motoneurons in the cervical spinal cord.

Effects of ipsilateral and contralateral cervical phrenic afferents stimulation on phrenic motor unit activity in the cat

The phrenic-to-phrenic inhibitory reflex has been analyzed using recordings of activity of single C5-phrenic motor units (PMUs). After ipsilateral or contralateral stimulation of the C6-phrenic root, early and late PMUs exhibit a similar inhibition. After contralateral stimulation, the duration of the inhibition is smaller and the threshold stimulus is higher than the corresponding values observed after ipsilateral stimulation. The latency of the inhibition is similar for both stimulations. Hemispinalization, contralateral to the recording site, affects weakly the phrenic-to-phrenic reflex. We conclude that early and late PMUs receive a similar inhibitory input from phrenic afferents and that the inhibition observed after cervical phrenic nerve stimulation may involve spinal cord circuits.

Inhibitory and excitatory effects on respiration by phrenic nerve afferent stimulation in cats

Respiratory effects of electrical stimulation of phrenic nerve afferents were studied in anesthetized cats, either spontaneously breathing or paralyzed and ventilated. The type of phrenic afferent fibers activated was controlled by recording the evoked action potentials from dorsal root fibers. In both preparations, stimulation at a strength sufficient to activate small diameter myelinated phrenic nerve afferents induced a biphasic response. The first phase lasted a few respiratory cycles and was inhibitory and consisted of a decrease in tidal volume (VT) or phrenic activity (NA), inspiratory time (TI), respiratory duty cycle (TI/Ttot) and instantaneous ventilation (VE) or minute phrenic activity (NMA). Expiratory time (TE) increased and breathing frequency (f) and mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI) or mean inspiratory neural activity (NA/TI) did not change. This short-term response was suppressed in animals pretreated with bicuculline. The second phase was a long-term excitation in which VT or NA, f, VE or NMA and VT/TI increased whereas both TI and TI/Ttot decreased and TE did not change. Unlike published data, our results suggest that small-diameter myelinated phrenic nerve afferents are involved in these responses. These phrenic fibers, like afferents from other muscles, affect respiratory output and may play a role in the control of breathing.