Close tip-to-tip contacts between dendrites of transient amacrine cells in carp retina

Suppression of electrical synapses between retinal amacrine cells of goldfish by intracellular cyclic-AMP

Retinal amacrine cells of the same class in cyprinid fish are homotypically connected by gap junctions. The permeability of their gap junctions examined by the diffusion of Neurobiotin into neighboring amacrine cells under application of dopamine or cyclic nucleotides to elucidate whether electrical synapses between the cells are regulated by internal messengers. Neurobiotin injected intracellularly into amacrine cells in isolated retinas of goldfish, and passage currents through the electrical synapses investigated by dual whole-patch clamp recordings under similar application of their ligands. Control conditions led us to observe large passage currents between connected cells and adequate transjunctional conductance between the cells (2.02±0.82nS). Experimental results show that high level of intracellular cyclic AMP within examined cells block transfer of Neurobiotin and suppress electrical synapses between the neighboring cells. Transjunctional conductance between examined cells reduced to 0.23nS. However, dopamine, 8-bromo-cyclic AMP or high elevation of intracellular cyclic GMP leaves gap junction channels of the cells permeable to Neurobiotin as in the control level. Under application of dopamine (1.25±0.06nS), 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (1.79±0.51nS) or intracellular cyclic GMP (0.98±0.23nS), the transjunctional conductance also remains as in the control level. These results demonstrate that channel opening of gap junctions between cyprinid retinal amacrine cells is regulated by high level of intracellular cyclic AMP.

Intracellular cyclic-amp suppresses the permeability of gap junctions between retinal amacrine cells

Gap junctions are intercellular channels composed of subunit protein connexin and subserve electrotonic transmission between connected neurons. Retinal amacrine cells, as well as horizontal cells of the same class, are homologously connected by gap junctions. The gap junctions between these neurons extend their receptive fields, and may increase the inhibitory postsynaptic effects in the retina. In the present study, we investigated whether gap junctions between the neurons are modulated by internal messengers. The permeability of gap junctions was examined by the diffusion of intracellularly injected biotinylated tracers, biocytin or Neurobiotin, into neighboring cells since gap junctions are permeable to these molecules freely. 4% Lucifer Yellow and 6% biocytin or Neurobiotin were injected intracellularly into horizontal cells and amacrine cells in isolated retinas of carp and goldfish and Japanese dace following electrophysiological identification. In the control condition, the tracer spread into many neighboring cells from the recorded cells. Superfusion of retinas with dopamine (100 microM) suppressed diffusion of the tracer into the neighboring horizontal cells, but not in the case of amacrine cells. Intracellular injection of cyclic AMP (300 mM) completely blocked diffusion of the tracer into neighboring horizontal cells and amacrine cells. However, superfusion of retinas with 8-bromo-cyclic AMP (2 mM), membrane permeable cyclic AMP analog, permitted the tracer to diffuse into the neighboring horizontal cells or amacrine cells. Intracellular injection of cyclic GMP (300 mM) blocked the diffusion between neighboring horizontal cells, but did not suppress the diffusion between amacrine cells. These results show that the permeability of gap junctions between amacrine cells is regulated by high concentration of intracellular cyclic AMP level, but not for intracellular cyclic GMP or applied dopamine or extracellularly applied low concentrations of intracellular cyclic AMP level. The present study suggests that these laterally oriented inhibitory interneurons, horizontal cells and amacrine cells, express different connexins which may be differentially regulated by intercellular messengers.

STRUCTURAL AND FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF HOMOLOGOUS ELECTRICAL SYNAPSES BETWEEN RETINAL AMACRINE CELLS

Retinal amacrine cells regulate activities of retinal ganglion cells, the output neurons to higher visual centers, through cellular mechanism of lateral inhibition in the inner plexiform layer (IPL). Electrical properties of gap junction networks between amacrine cells in the IPL were investigated using combined techniques of intracellular recordings, Lucifer yellow and Neurobiotin injection, dual patch-clamp recordings and high voltage electron microscopy in isolated retinas of cyprinid fish. Six types of gap-junctionally connected amacrine cells were classified after their light-evoked responses to light flashes were recorded. Among them, gap junction networks of three types of amacrine cells were studied with structure-function correlation analysis. Cellular morphology of intercellular connections between three homologous cell classes was characterized. The interconnections between laterally extending dendrites in the IPL were localized at dendritic tip terminals. Three types of cells presented the dendrodendritic connections of tip-contact manner in the homologous cell population. High voltage as well as conventional electron microscopy revealed gap junctions between the dendritic tips of Neurobiotin-coupled cells. Receptive field properties of these amacrine cells were examined, displacing a slit of light along the distance from recording sites in the dorsal intermediate region of the retina. Receptive field size, space length constant, response latency and conduction velocity were measured. Spatial and temporal properties of receptive fields were symmetric along horizontally expanding dendrites in the dorsal retina. Simultaneous dual patch-clamp recordings revealed that the lateral gap junction connections between homologous amacrine cells expressed bidirectional electrical synapses passing Na(+) spikes. These results demonstrate that bidirectional electrical transmission in gap junction networks of these amacrine cells is symmetric along the lateral gap junction connections between horizontally extending dendrites. Lateral inhibition regulated by amacrine cells in the IPL appears to be associated with the directional extension of the dendrites and the orientation of dendrodendritic gap junctions.

Gap-junction communication between subtypes of direction-selective ganglion cells in the developing retina

The On-Off direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) in the rabbit retina comprise four distinct subtypes that respond preferentially to image motion in four orthogonal directions; each subtype forms a regular territorial array, which is overlapped by the other three arrays. In this study, ganglion cells in the developing retina were injected with Neurobiotin, a gap-junction-permeable tracer, and the DSGCs were identified by their characteristic type 1 bistratified (BiS1) morphology. The complex patterns of tracer coupling shown by the BiS1 ganglion cells changed systematically during the course of postnatal development. BiS1 cells appear to be coupled together around the time of birth, but, over the next 10 days, BiS1 cells decouple from each other, leading to the mature pattern in which only one subtype is coupled. At about postnatal day 5, before the ganglion cells become visually responsive, each of the BiS1 cells commonly showed tracer coupling both to a regular array of neighboring BiS1 cells, presumably destined to be DSGCs of the same subtype, and to a regular array of overlapping BiS1 cells, presumably destined to be DSGCs of a different subtype. The gap-junction intercellular communication between subtypes of DSGCs with different preferred directions may play an important role in the differentiation of their synaptic connectivity, with respect to either the inputs that DSGCs receive from retinal interneurons or the outputs that DSGCs make to geniculate neurons.

The type 1 polyaxonal amacrine cells of the rabbit retina: A tracer-coupling study

The type 1 polyaxonal (PA1) cell is a distinct type of axon-bearing amacrine cell whose soma commonly occupies an interstitial position in the inner plexiform layer; the proximal branches of the sparse dendritic tree produce 1–4 axon-like processes, which form an extensive axonal arbor that is concentric with the smaller dendritic tree (Dacey, 1989; Famiglietti, 1992a,b). In this study, intracellular injections of Neurobiotin have revealed the complete dendritic and axonal morphology of the PA1 cells in the rabbit retina, as well as labeling the local array of PA1 cells through homologous tracer coupling. The dendritic-field area of the PA1 cells increased from a minimum of 0.15 mm2 (0.44-mm equivalent diameter) on the visual streak to a maximum of 0.67 mm2 (0.92-mm diameter) in the far periphery; the axonal-field area also showed a 3-fold variation across the retina, ranging from 3.1 mm2 (2.0-mm diameter) to 10.2 mm2 (3.6-mm diameter). The increase in dendritic- and axonal-field size was accompanied by a reduction in cell density, from 60 cells/mm2 in the visual streak to 20 cells/mm2 in the far periphery, so that the PA1 cells showed a 12 times overlap of their dendritic fields across the retina and a 200–300 times overlap of their axonal fields. Consequently, the axonal plexus was much denser than the dendritic plexus, with each square millimeter of retina containing ∼100 mm of dendrites and ∼1000 mm of axonal processes. The strong homologous tracer coupling revealed that ∼45% of the PA1 somata were located in the inner nuclear layer, ∼50% in the inner plexiform layer, and ∼5% in the ganglion cell layer. In addition, the Neurobiotin-injected PA1 cells sometimes showed clear heterologous tracer coupling to a regular array of small ganglion cells, which were present at half the density of the PA1 cells. The PA1 cells were also shown to contain elevated levels of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), like other axon-bearing amacrine cells.

Type 1 nitrergic (ND1) cells of the rabbit retina: Comparison with other axon-bearing amacrine cells

NADPH diaphorase (NADPHd) histochemistry labels two types of nitrergic amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. Both the large ND1 cells and the small ND2 cells stratify in the middle of the inner plexiform layer, and their overlapping processes produce a dense plexus, which makes it difficult to trace the morphology of single cells. The complete morphology of the ND1 amacrine cells has been revealed by injecting Neurobiotin into large round somata in the inner nuclear layer, which resulted in the labelling of amacrine cells whose proximal morphology and stratification matched those of the ND1 cells stained by NADPHd histochemistry. The Neurobiotin-injected ND1 cells showed strong homologous tracer coupling to surrounding ND1 cells, and double-labelling experiments confirmed that these coupled cells showed NADPHd reactivity. The ND1 amacrine cells branch in stratum 3 of the inner plexiform layer, where they produce a sparsely branched dendritic tree of 400-600 microm diameter in ventral peripheral retina. In addition, each cell gives rise to several fine beaded processes, which arise either from a side branch of the dendritic tree or from the tapering of a distal dendrite. These axon-like processes branch successively within the vicinity of the dendritic field before extending, with little or no further branching, for 3-5 mm from the soma in ventral peripheral retina. Consequently, these cells may span one-third of the visual field of each eye, and their spatial extent appears to be greater than that of most other types of axon-bearing amacrine cells injected with Neurobiotin in this study. The morphology and tracer-coupling pattern of the ND1 cells are compared with those of confirmed type 1 catecholaminergic cells, a presumptive type 2 catecholaminergic cell, the type 1 polyaxonal cells, the long-range amacrine cells, a novel type of axon-bearing cell that also branches in stratum 3, and a type of displaced amacrine cell that may correspond to the type 2 polyaxonal cell.

Neuronal coupling in the central nervous system: lessons from the retina

The retina is a model system for studying gap junctional intercellular communication in the CNS. The cellular coupling can be graphically visualized in retinal whole mounts by injecting small cationic tracers into microscopically identified neurons; the pattern of tracer coupling shown by each type of retina neuron is highly stereotyped, with many types of amacrine cells and ganglion cells showing complex patterns of both homologous and heterologous coupling. Parallel physiological studies have demonstrated that the gap junctions can be modulated dynamically by neurotransmitters and by the level of ambient illumination. Taken together, the numerous structural and functional studies on gap junctions in the retina provide powerful support for the concept that electrical synapses are complex components of neuronal circuits, having many of the attributes normally ascribed to chemical synapses.

A comparison of receptive-field and tracer-coupling size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina

Recent studies have shown that amacrine and ganglion cells in the mammalian retina are extensively coupled as revealed by the intercellular movement of the biotinylated tracers biocytin and Neurobiotin. These demonstrations of tracer coupling suggest that electrical networks formed by proximal neurons (i.e. amacrine and ganglion cells) may underlie the lateral propagation of signals across the inner retina. We studied this question by comparing the receptive-field size, dendritic-field size, and extent of tracer coupling of amacrine and ganglion cells in the dark-adapted, superfused, isolated retina eyecup of the rabbit. Our results indicate that while the center-receptive fields of proximal neurons are approximately 15% larger than their corresponding dendritic diameters, this slight difference can be explained by factors other than electrical coupling such as tissue shrinkage associated with histological processing. However, the extent of tracer coupling of amacrine and ganglion cells was, on average, about twice the size of the corresponding receptive fields. Thus, the receptive field of an individual proximal neuron matched far more closely to its dendritic diameter than to the size of the tracer-coupled network of cells to which it belonged. The exception to this rule was the AII amacrine cells for which center-receptive fields were 2-3 times the size of their dendritic diameters but matched closely to the size of the tracer-coupled arrays. Thus, with the exception of AII cells, our data indicate that tracer coupling between proximal neurons is not associated with an enlargement of their receptive fields. Our results, then, provide no evidence for electrical coupling or, at least, indicate that extensive lateral spread of visual signals does not occur in the proximal mammalian retina.

Processing of color- and noncolor-coded signals in the gourami retina. II. Amacrine cells

The same set of stimuli and analytic methods that was used to study the dynamics of horizontal cells () was applied to a study of the response dynamics and signal processing in amacrine cells in the retina of the kissing gourami, Helostoma rudolfi. The retina contains two major classes of amacrine cells that could be identified from their morphology: C and N amacrine cells. C amacrine cells had a two-layered dendritic field, whereas N cells had a monolayered dendritic field. Both types of amacrine cell were tracer-coupled but coupling was more extensive in the N amacrine cells. Responses from C amacrine cells lacked a DC component and had a small linear component that was <10% in terms of mean square error (MSE); the second-order component often accounted for >50% of the modulation response. The C amacrine cells did not show any characteristic color coding under any stimulus condition. Most responses of N cells to a pulsatile stimulus consisted of a series of depolarizing transient potentials and steady illumination did not generate any DC potential in these cells. The response to a white-noise modulated input was composed of well-defined first- and second-order components and, possibly, higher-order components. The response evoked by a red or green white-noise-modulated stimulus given alone was not color coded. Modulated red illumination in the presence of a green illumination elicited a color-coded response from >70% of N amacrine cells. Color information was carried not only by the polarity but also by the dynamics of the first-order component. No convincing evidence was obtained to indicate that the second-order component might be involved in color processing. Some N amacrine cells produced a well-defined (second-order) interaction kernel to show that the temporal sequence of red and green stimuli was a parameter to be considered. In a complex cell such as an amacrine cell, responses evoked by a pulsatile stimulus given in darkness and by modulation of a mean luminance could be very different in terms of their characteristics. It was not always possible to predict the response evoked by one stimulus from observing the cell's response to another stimulus. This is because, in N cells, a flash-evoked (nonsteady state) response is composed largely of nonlinear components whereas a modulation (steady state) response is composed of linear as well as nonlinear components.

Tracer coupling pattern of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina

We examined the tracer coupling pattern of more than 15 morphological types of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Individual cells were injected intracellularly with the biotinylated tracer Neurobiotin, which was then allowed to diffuse across gap junctions to label neighboring neurons. We found that homologous and/or heterologous tracer coupling was common for most proximal neurons. In fact, the starburst amacrine cell was the only amacrine cell type that showed no evidence of coupling. The remaining types of amacrine cell were coupled exclusively to other amacrines, either homologously or, more often, through a combination of homologous and heterologous junctions. In only one case did we visualize labeled ganglion cells following injection of Neurobiotin into an amacrine cell. In contrast, injection of Neurobiotin into ganglion cells almost always resulted in the labeling of amacrine cells. Taken together, these results suggest a directionality to the movement of tracer across gap junctions connecting amacrine and ganglion cells. We found that the coupling pattern for a given morphological type of cell was generally stereotypic and consistent across retinas. The notable exceptions to this finding were alpha ganglion cells and cells with morphology corresponding to that of on-off direction selective ganglion cells. In both cases, individual cells showed either extensive coupling to both amacrine and ganglion cells or no coupling at all. A notable finding was that, in every case, the neighboring cells within a tracer-coupled array were always within one gap junction of the injected neuron. Furthermore, in many cases, the array formed by the somata of tracer-coupled cells was almost perfectly coincident with the dendritic arbor of the injected cell. Thus, our results indicate that whereas coupling is extensive within the proximal retina, individual cells partake in coupled networks that are stereotypic and highly circumscribed.

Gap junctions in the vertebrate retina

The vertebrate retina is a highly laminated assemblage of specialized neuronal types, many of which are coupled by gap junctions. With one interesting exception, gap junctions are not directly responsible for the 'vertical' transmission of visual information from photoreceptors through bipolar and ganglion cells to the brain. Instead, they mediate 'lateral' connections, coupling neurons of a single type or subtype into an extended, regular array or mosaic in the plane of the retina. Such mosaics have been studied by several microscopic techniques, but new evidence for their coupled nature has recently been obtained by intracellular injection of biotinylated tracers, which can pass through gap junctional assemblies that do not pass Lucifer Yellow. This evidence adds momentum to an existing paradigm shift towards a population-based view of the retina, which can now be envisaged both as an array of semi-autonomous vertical processing modules, each extending right through the retina, and as a multi-layered stack of interacting planar mosaics, bearing some resemblance to a set of interleaved neural networks. Junctional conductance across mosaics of horizontal cells is known to be controlled dynamically with a circadian rhythm, and other dynamically-regulated conductance changes are also likely to make important contributions to signal processing. The retina is an excellent system in which to study such changes because many aspects of its structure and function are already well understood. In this review, we summarize the microscopic appearance, coupling properties and functions of gap junctions for each cell type of the neural retina, the regulatory properties that could be provided by selective expression of different connexin proteins, and the evidence for gap junctional coupling in retina development.

Double-staining of horizontal and amacrine cells by intracellular injection with lucifer yellow and biocytin in carp retina

Horizontal and amacrine cells in the isolated carp retina were impaled with micropipette electrode, identified by their characteristic light responses, and injected iontophoretically with markers for morphological study. Both Lucifer Yellow CH and biocytin were injected simultaneously. Lucifer Yellow was seen by its own fluorescence while biocytin was visualized by binding with Texas Red-linked or horseradish peroxidase-conjugated avidin. For cone-connected horizontal cells, biocytin-coupled cells were found to be approximately five-times more numerous than Lucifer Yellow-coupled cells. Coupling for both tracers was consistently hampered by intravitreally applied dopamine. In untreated retinas, the injected Lucifer Yellow was restricted within one rod-connected horizontal cell, while biocytin revealed several coupled neighbors. Amacrine cells, labeled by the tracers, were morphologically grouped into eight types, based on our earlier classification. Among them, amacrine cells, belonging to three types (Fnd, Pmb or Pma), were confirmed to be Lucifer Yellow-coupled, and the number of biocytin-coupled cells was more numerous (about 2.5 times) than that of Lucifer Yellow-coupled cells. Most amacrine cells (i.e. Pwd, Fnb and Fna) showed biocytin-coupling with no Lucifer Yellow-coupling. A few classified (i.e. Pwb and Fwa) and unclassified cells did not show any coupling. Since the tracer coupling takes place via gap junctions, the majority of amacrine cells, belonging to certain homologous types, appear to be functionally coupled with each other in the inner plexiform layer. However, dopamine did not influence the range of tracer coupling between amacrine cells in the carp retina under the present experimental conditions.

Morphology of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes during development in the intact rat optic nerve

The detailed three-dimensional morphology of macroglial cells was determined throughout postnatal development in the intact rat optic nerve, a central nervous system white matter tract. Over 750 cells were analyzed by intracellular injection of horseradish peroxidase or Lucifer Yellow to provide a new perspective of glial differentiation in situ. Retrograde analysis of changes in glial morphology allowed us to identify developmental timetables for three morphological subclasses of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes, and to estimate their time of emergence from undifferentiated glial progenitors. Glial progenitors were recognised throughout postnatal development and persisted in 35-day-old nerves, where we suggest they represent adult progenitor cells. Astrocytes were present at birth, but the majority of these cells developed over the first week as three morphological classes emerged having either transverse, random, or longitudinal process orientation. Several lines of evidence led us to believe that the majority of astrocytes in the rat optic nerve were morphological variations of a single cell type. Young oligodendrocytes were first observed 2 days after birth, indicating that they diverged from progenitors at or near this time. During early development these cells extended a large number of fine processes, which then bifurcated and extended along axons. Later, as myelination proceeded, oligodendrocytes exhibited fewer processes which grew symmetrically and uniformly along the axons, resulting in a highly stereotypic mature oligodendrocyte form. Our analysis of oligodendrocyte growth suggests that these cells did not myelinate axons in a random manner and that axons may influence the myelinating processes of nearby oligodendrocytes.