Concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide and morphine-3-glucuronide in serum and cerebrospinal fluid following morphine administration to patients with morphine-resistant pain

Morphine-3-Glucuronide, Physiology and Behavior

Morphine remains the gold standard painkiller available to date to relieve severe pain. Morphine metabolism leads to the production of two predominant metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G). This metabolism involves uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), which catalyze the addition of a glucuronide moiety onto the C3 or C6 position of morphine. Interestingly, M3G and M6G have been shown to be biologically active. On the one hand, M6G produces potent analgesia in rodents and humans. On the other hand, M3G provokes a state of strong excitation in rodents, characterized by thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia. Its coadministration with morphine or M6G also reduces the resulting analgesia. Although these behavioral effects show quite consistency in rodents, M3G effects are much more debated in humans and the identity of the receptor(s) on which M3G acts remains unclear. Indeed, M3G has little affinity for mu opioid receptor (MOR) (on which morphine binds) and its effects are retained in the presence of naloxone or naltrexone, two non-selective MOR antagonists. Paradoxically, MOR seems to be essential to M3G effects. In contrast, several studies proposed that TLR4 could mediate M3G effects since this receptor also appears to be essential to M3G-induced hyperalgesia. This review summarizes M3G's behavioral effects and potential targets in the central nervous system, as well as the mechanisms by which it might oppose analgesia.

Pharmacogenomics in Children

Historically genetics has not been considered when prescribing drugs for children. However, it is clear that genetics are not only an important determinant of disease in children but also of drug response for many important drugs that are core agents used in the therapy of common problems in children. Advances in therapy and in the ethical construct of children's research have made pharmacogenomic assessment for children much easier to pursue. It is likely that pharmacogenomics will become part of the therapeutic decision-making process for children, notably in areas such as childhood cancer where weighing benefits and risks of therapy is crucial.

Electrochemical Detection of Morphine in Untreated Human Capillary Whole Blood

Disposable single-use electrochemical sensor strips were used for quantitative detection of small concentrations of morphine in untreated capillary whole blood. Single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) networks were fabricated on a polymer substrate to produce flexible, reproducible sensor strips with integrated reference and counter electrodes, compatible with industrial-scale processes. A thin Nafion coating was used on top of the sensors to enable direct electrochemical detection in whole blood. These sensors were shown to detect clinically relevant concentrations of morphine both in buffer and in whole blood samples. Small 38 μL finger-prick blood samples were spiked with 2 μL of morphine solution of several concentrations and measured without precipitation of proteins or any other further pretreatment. A linear range of 0.5-10 μM was achieved in both matrices and a detection limit of 0.48 μM in buffer. In addition, to demonstrate the applicability of the sensor in a point-of-care device, single-determination measurements were done with capillary samples from three subjects. An average recovery of 60% was found, suggesting that the sensor only measures the free, unbound fraction of the drug. An interference study with other opioids and possible interferents showed the selectivity of the sensor. This study clearly indicates that these Nafion/SWCNT sensor strips show great promise as a point-of-care rapid test for morphine in blood.

Morphine-3-glucuronide causes antinociceptive cross-tolerance to morphine and increases spinal substance P expression

Morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), the main metabolite of morphine, has been implicated in the development of tolerance and of opioid-induced hyperalgesia, both limiting the analgesic use of morphine. We evaluated the acute and chronic effects of M3G and morphine as well as development of antinociceptive cross-tolerance between morphine and M3G after intrathecal administration and assessed the expression of pain-associated neurotransmitter substance P in the spinal cord. Sprague-Dawley rats received intrathecal M3G or morphine twice daily for 6 days. Nociception and tactile allodynia were measured with von Frey filaments after acute and chronic treatments. Substance P levels in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord were determined by immunohistochemistry after 4-day treatments. Acute morphine caused antinociception as expected, whereas acute M3G caused tactile allodynia, as did both chronic M3G and morphine. Chronic M3G also induced antinociceptive cross-tolerance to morphine. M3G and morphine increased substance P levels similarly in the nociceptive laminae of the spinal cord. This study shows that chronic intrathecal M3G sensitises animals to mechanical stimulation and elevates substance P levels in the nociceptive laminae of the spinal cord. Chronic M3G also induces antinociceptive cross-tolerance to morphine. Thus, chronic M3G exposure might contribute to morphine-induced tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia.

Simultaneous Detection of Morphine and Codeine in the Presence of Ascorbic Acid and Uric Acid and in Human Plasma at Nafion Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Thin-Film Electrode

In clinical settings, the dosing and differential diagnosis of the poisoning of morphine (MO) and codeine (CO) is challenging due to interindividual variations in metabolism. However, direct electrochemical detection of these analytes from biological matrices is inherently challenging due to interference from large concentrations of anions, such as ascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA), as well as fouling of the electrode by proteins. In this work, a disposable Nafion-coated single-walled carbon nanotube network (SWCNT) electrode was developed. We show facile electron transfer and efficient charge separation between the interfering anions and positively charged MO and CO, as well as significantly reduced matrix effect in human plasma. The Nafion coating alters the voltammetric response of MO and CO, enabling simultaneous detection. With this SWCNT/Nafion electrode, two linear ranges of 0.05-1 and 1-10 μM were found for MO and one linear range of 0.1-50 μM for CO. Moreover, the selective and simultaneous detection of MO and CO was achieved in large excess of AA and UA, as well as, for the first time, in unprocessed human plasma. The favorable properties of this electrode enabled measurements in plasma with only mild dilution and without the precipitation of proteins.

Hydromorphone-induced Neurostimulation in a Yorkshire Swine (Sus scrofa) after Myocardial Infarction Surgery

Opiates play an important role in the control of pain associated with thoracotomy in both people and animals. However, key side effects, including sedation and respiratory depression, could limit the use of opiates in animals that are lethargic due to cardiac disease. In addition, a rare side effect-neuroexcitation resulting in pathologic behavioral changes (seizures, mania, muscle fasciculation)-after the administration of morphine or hydromorphone is well-documented in many species. In pigs, however, these drugs have been shown to stimulate an increase in normal activity. In the case presented, we describe a Yorkshire-cross pig which, after myocardial infarction surgery, went from nonresponsive to alert, responsive, and eating within 30 min of an injection of hydromorphone. This pig was not demonstrating any signs associated with pain at this time, suggesting that the positive response was due to neural stimulation. This case report is the first to describe the use of hydromorphone-a potent, pure μ opiate agonist-for its neurostimulatory effect in pigs with experimentally-induced cardiac disease.

Morphine Preconditioning Downregulates MicroRNA-134 Expression Against Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation Injuries in Cultured Neurons of Mice

BACKGROUND

Brain protection by narcotics such as morphine is clinically relevant due to the extensive use of narcotics in the perioperative period. Morphine preconditioning induces neuroprotection in neurons, but it remains uncertain whether microRNA-134 (miR-134) is involved in morphine preconditioning against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced injuries in primary cortical neurons of mice. The present study examined this issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After cortical neurons of mice were cultured in vitro for 6 days, the neurons were transfected by respective virus vector, such as lentiviral vector (LV)-miR-control-GFP, LV-pre-miR-134-GFP, LV-pre-miR-134-inhibitor-GFP for 24 hours; after being normally cultured for 3 days again, morphine preconditioning was performed by incubating the transfected primary neurons with morphine (3 μM) for 1 hour, and then neuronal cells were exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) for 1 hour and oxygen-glucose recovery for 12 hours. The neuronal cells survival rate and the amount of apoptotic neurons were determined by MTT assay or TUNEL staining at designated time; and the expression levels of miR-134 were detected using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction at the same time.

RESULTS

The neuronal cell survival rate was significantly higher, and the amount of apoptotic neurons was significantly decreased in neurons preconditioned with morphine before OGD than that of OGD alone. The neuroprotection induced by morphine preconditioning was partially blocked by upregulating miR-134 expression, and was enhanced by downregulating miR-134 expression. The expression of miR-134 was significantly decreased in morphine-preconditioned neurons alone without transfection.

CONCLUSIONS

By downregulating miR-134 expression, morphine preconditioning protects primary cortical neurons of mice against injuries induced by OGD.

Pharmacogenomics and adverse drug reactions in children

Adverse drug reactions are a common and important complication of drug therapy in children. Over the past decade it has become increasingly apparent that genetically controlled variations in drug disposition and response are important determinants of adverse events for many important adverse events associated with drug therapy in children. While this research has been difficult to conduct over the past decade technical and ethical evolution has greatly facilitated the ability of investigators to conduct pharmacogenomic studies in children. Some of this research has already resulted in changes in public policy and clinical practice, for example in the case of codeine use by mothers and children. It is likely that the use of pharmacogenomics to enhance drug safety will first be realized among selected groups of children with high rates of drug use such as children with cancer, but it also likely that this research will be extended to other groups of children who have high rates of drug utilization and as well as providing insights into the mechanisms and pathophysiology of adverse drug reactions in children.

Pharmacogenomics in children

Historically genetics has not been considered when prescribing drugs for children. However, it is clear that genetics are not only an important determinant of disease in children but also of drug response for many important drugs that are core agents used in the therapy of common problems in children. Advances in therapy and in the ethical construct of children's research have made pharmacogenomic assessment for children much easier to pursue. It is likely that pharmacogenomics will become part of the therapeutic decision making process for children, notably in areas such as childhood cancer where the benefits and risks of therapy are considerable.

Spinal morphine in nonmalignant chronic pain: a retrospective study in 39 patients

It was the purpose of this study to retrospectively test the safety and efficacy of the use of intraspinal analgesics in a diverse population of patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. This study was conducted in 39 patients, refractory to conventional therapies for intrathecal therapy. Twenty-two patients had neuropathic pain and 17 had nociceptive pain. The mean follow-up of this patient population was 2.2 years with a range of 36 months to 6.5 years. Analgesia with intraspinal morphine, initial and final dose of intraspinal agents used, stability of morphine dose over time, and side effects and complications with or without bupivacaine and/or clonidine was assessed after 6 months of treatment, and at the end of study. After 6 months, three patients discontinued the study for differing reasons, 28 patients (77.8%) reported excellent results, and five patients (14%) reported good results. One patient reported no pain relief with intraspinal morphine and bupivacaine and five patients reported insufficient or no pain relief. At final assessment, 20 patients (55.6%) reported excellent results with no differences based on pain type or pain syndrome and eight patients (22.2%) reported good analgesia. Morphine doses remained stable throughout treatment, with an average dose of 2 mg per patient. Ninety-one percent of patients were satisfied with the method used and considered it superior to all previous therapeutic techniques tried, improving their quality of life. As for complications, one patient developed a clostridial infection during the immediate postoperative period which required pump removal and one patient developed severe urinary retention requiring system removal. There were three catheter obstructions (two in the same patient) and one catheter disconnection. Other patient-reported side effects were not considered significant by the authors to be mentioned here. After more than 6 years of experience with spinal infusion of morphine, either alone or admixed with other spinal analgesics, in patients with pain of nonmalignant origin, we consider the technique to be helpful in selected patients not responding to oral treatment or when untoward side effects exist with oral treatment. The advantages, as regards to analgesic efficacy and quality of life, clearly outweigh the drawbacks of the long-term use of spinal morphine.

Pharmacological consequences of long-term morphine treatment in patients with cancer and chronic non-malignant pain

BACKGROUND

In patients with pain of malignant origin morphine may be administered in high and often increasing doses during extended periods of time. In patients with chronic pain of non-malignant origin morphine may be an important remedy, and in these cases the goal is to keep the morphine dose stable. The pharmacokinetic as well as the pharmacodynamic consequences of long-term morphine treatment with special reference to the two most important metabolites of morphine morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G) remain to be settled.

METHODS

Assessments for pain, sedation and other morphine induced side effects were made several times for 19 cancer patients treated with changing doses of oral sustained release (SR) morphine and twice for 17 non-cancer patients treated with stable doses of SR morphine. Blood samples were obtained simultaneously and analysed for contents of morphine, M-3-G and M-6-G by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma morphine (r = 0.469, p < 0.01), plasma M-6-G (r = 0.677, p < 0.01), and plasma M-3-G ((r = 0.827, p < 0.01), in the cancer patient group, but only between the daily dose of SR morphine and plasma M-3-G (0.662, p < 0.01) and plasma M-6-G (0.571, p < 0.01) in the non-cancer patient group. Normalised M-3-G/M and M-6-G/M ratios for the cancer patient group were independent of duration of treatment and daily dose of SR morphine. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group duration of treatment did not influence the metabolite ratios. Correlations between pain score and plasma morphine, M-6-G and M-6-G/M were weak in the cancer patient as well as in the non-cancer patient group making it impossible to draw any conclusion regarding the potential contributory analgesic effect of M-6-G. Dryness of the mouth was the most frequent adverse effect reported in the non-cancer as well as the cancer patient group. In the latter group patients complaining of dryness of the mouth had significantly higher plasma morphine and M-6-G concentrations than patients who did not suffer from this side effect. This difference persisted (or was close to significance) when excluding patients receiving antidepressants.

CONCLUSION

In the cancer patient group neither dose nor treatment period seems to influence morphine glucuronidation. Likewise in the non-cancer patient group receiving stable doses of morphine duration of treatment does not seem to influence morphine glucuronidation. Dryness of the mouth was positively correlated to high plasma concentrations of morphine and M-6-G.

The pharmacokinetics of codeine and its metabolites in Blacks with sickle cell disease

PURPOSE

We conducted a prospective, open-label study in 54 adult subjects with sickle cell disease to determine the relationship between morphine concentrations, cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A blood sample was obtained for genotyping and serial blood samples were drawn to measure codeine and its metabolites in the plasma before and after oral codeine sulfate 30 mg. Codeine and its metabolites were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS). CYP2D6 genetic testing included four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) indicative of three variant alleles: *17 (1023T); *29 (1659A, 3183A); and *41 (2988A) alleles.

RESULTS

Thirty subjects (group I) had a mean (standard deviation) maximal morphine concentration of 2.0 (1.0) ng/ml. Morphine was not measurable in the remaining 24 subjects (group II). Nine (30%) subjects in group I and 11 (46%) subjects in group II carried a variant *17, *29, or *41 allele (p = 0.23); one (3%) subject in group I and 5 (21%) subjects in group II were homozygous for *17 or *29 allele (p = 0.07). Emergency room visits (group I 1.5 +/- 1.8 vs. group II 2.1 +/- 4.3, p = NS) did not differ based on metabolic status, but more hospital admissions (0.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 2.2 +/- 4.1, p = 0.05) were documented in patients with no measurable morphine concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that Blacks with sickle cell disease without measurable plasma morphine levels after a single dose of codeine were not more likely to be a carrier of a single variant allele commonly associated with reduced CYP2D6 metabolic capacity; however, homozygosity for a variant CYP2D6 allele may result in reduced metabolic capacity. Furthermore, it appears that subjects without measurable morphine concentrations were more likely to be admitted to the hospital for an acute pain crisis.

Critical care sedation for neuroscience patients

In 2000, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) introduced the mandate for the implementation of standards for both pain assessment and need for therapy in hospitalized patients. The need for the appropriate titration of sedation and analgesia is particularly poignant in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting where iatrogenic discomfort often complicates patient management. Neurologically ill patients in ICUs present particularly complex sedation issues, owing to the need to monitor these patients with serial neurological exams. Hence, maximal comfort without diminishing neurological responsiveness is desirable. Here, we review the frequently applied methods of evaluating levels of pain and agitation in critically ill patients as well as discuss the appropriate classes of pharmaceutical agents common to this population, with particular emphasis on the potential neurophysiological impact of such therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Methadone Enantiomers in Hospice Patients With Cancer Pain

Racemic methadone is increasingly used to manage cancer pain. The authors studied 13 terminally ill patients with cancer pain, who underwent switching (rotation) from morphine to methadone. The relationship between initial morphine dose and final methadone dose, the pharmacokinetics of R- and S- methadone, and the degree of pain control and side effects were investigated. Preswitching serum morphine concentrations and second daily plasma concentrations of methadone were measured. The brief pain inventory (BPI) was used to assess pain every second day. "Worst pain" as measured by the BPI improved by >/=20% in 6 of the 13 patients. The mean morphine to methadone conversion ratio was 5.2 with wide interpatient variability (range 1.3 to 11). Average steady-state concentrations were 197 (98 to 379) mug/L and 272 (55 to 378) mug/L for R- and S-methadone, respectively. Mean population pharmacokinetic parameters for a 1-compartment model were 455 L and 338 L for apparent volume of distribution and 53.3 hours and 31.5 hours for half-life for R- and S- methadone, respectively. Bayesian estimates of apparent oral clearance for individual patients were 0.082 (0.052 to 0.112) L/kg/h and 0.117 (0.061 to 0.173) L/kg/h for R- and S- methadone, respectively (mean and 95% confidence interval). The low and variable clearance values generally resulted in slow achievement of steady-state concentrations over several days; inappropriately high plasma methadone levels occurred in 1 patient. Whereas optimal pain control was achieved in 46% of patients, there was no relationship with plasma concentrations of methadone. Best practice for methadone use in this patient group should include monitoring of both pain and methadone concentration.

Glucuronidation in therapeutic drug monitoring

BACKGROUND

Glucuronidation is a major drug-metabolizing reaction in humans. A pharmacological effect of glucuronide metabolites is frequently neglected and the value of therapeutic drug monitoring has been questioned. However, this may not always be true.

METHODS

In this review the impact of glucuronidation on therapeutic drug monitoring has been evaluated on the basis of a literature search and experience from the own laboratory.

RESULTS

The potential role of monitoring glucuronide metabolite concentrations to optimize therapeutic outcome is addressed on the basis of selected examples of drugs which are metabolized to biologically active/reactive glucuronides. Furthermore indirect effects of glucuronide metabolites on parent drug pharmacokinetics are presented. In addition, factors that may modulate the disposition of these metabolites (e.g. genetic polymorphisms, disease processes, age, and drug-drug interactions) are briefly mentioned and their relevance for the clinical situation is critically discussed.

CONCLUSION

Glucuronide metabolites can have indirect as well as direct pharmacological or toxicological effects. Although convincing evidence to support the introduction of glucuronide monitoring into clinical practice is currently missing, measurement of glucuronide concentrations may be advantageous in specific situations. If the glucuronide metabolite has an indirect effect on the pharmacokinetics of the parent compound, monitoring of the parent drug may be considered. Furthermore pharmacogenetic approaches considering uridine diphosphate (UDP) glucuronosyltransferases polymorphisms may become useful in the future to optimize therapy with drugs subject to glucuronidation.

Routine drug monitoring of serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide do not predict clinical observations in cancer patients

The clinical importance of routine drug monitoring of serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) during chronic morphine therapy is not established. We measured morphine, M6G and M3G serum concentrations in cancer pain patients receiving oral (n = 263, median dose 80 mg/24 hours) or subcutaneous (sc) (n = 35, median dose 110 mg/24 hours) morphine. Regression analyses were performed to investigate if serum concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G predicted pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory), health-related quality-of-life variables (EORTC QLQ-C30) and cognitive function (Mini-Mental Score). Serum concentrations were also compared in patients categorized as morphine 'treatment successes' and 'treatment failures'. We observed that serum concentrations of morphine, M6G or M3G did not predict pain intensity, cognitive function, nausea or tiredness. 'Treatment failures' caused by nausea, tiredness, cognitive failure or constipation did not have statistically significant different morphine, M6G and M3G serum concentrations than patients classified as 'treatment successes'. In conclusion, this study did not observe any concentration-effect relationships of morphine, M3G or M6G with pain intensity, nausea, constipation, tiredness or cognitive failure in blood samples obtained during routine clinical drug monitoring in cancer patients. This result suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring as a routine tool during chronic morphine treatment has limited value for clinical decision making.

Morphine-3-glucuronide's neuro-excitatory effects are mediated via indirect activation of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors: mechanistic studies in embryonic cultured hippocampal neurones

Indirect evidence indicates that morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) may contribute significantly to the neuro-excitatory side effects (myoclonus and allodynia) of large-dose systemic morphine. To gain insight into the mechanism underlying M3G's excitatory behaviors, we used fluo-3 fluorescence digital imaging techniques to assess the acute effects of M3G (5-500 microM) on the cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](CYT)) in cultured embryonic hippocampal neurones. Acute (3 min) exposure of neurones to M3G evoked [Ca(2+)](CYT) transients that were typically either (a) transient oscillatory responses characterized by a rapid increase in [Ca(2+)](CYT) oscillation amplitude that was sustained for at least approximately 30 s or (b) a sustained increase in [Ca(2+)](CYT) that slowly recovered to baseline. Naloxone-pretreatment decreased the proportion of M3G-responsive neurones by 10%-25%, implicating a predominantly non-opioidergic mechanism. Although the naloxone-insensitive M3G-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](CYT) were completely blocked by N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) antagonists and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid/kainate antagonist), CNQX did not block the large increase in [Ca(2+)](CYT) evoked by NMDA (as expected), confirming that M3G indirectly activates the NMDA receptor. Additionally, tetrodotoxin (Na(+) channel blocker), baclofen (gamma-aminobutyric acid(B) agonist), MVIIC (P/Q-type calcium channel blocker), and nifedipine (L-type calcium channel blocker) all abolished M3G-induced increases in [Ca(2+)](CYT), suggesting that M3G may produce its neuro-excitatory effects by modulating neurotransmitter release. However, additional characterization is required.

IMPLICATIONS

Large systemic doses of morphine administered to some patients for cancer pain management have been reported to produce myoclonus and allodynia. Indirect evidence implicates the major morphine metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), in these neuro-excitatory side effects. Hence, this study was designed to gain insight into the cellular mechanism responsible for M3G's neuro-excitatory actions.

Relationships among morphine metabolism, pain and side effects during long-term treatment: an update

The two metabolites of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), have been studied intensively in animals and humans during the past 30 years in order to elucidate their precise action and possible contribution to the desired effects and side effects seen after morphine administration. M3G and M6G are formed by morphine glucuronidation, mainly in the liver, and are excreted by the kidneys. The metabolites are found in the cerebrospinal fluid after single as well as multiple doses of morphine. M6G binds to opioid receptors, and animal studies have demonstrated that M6G may be a more potent analgesic than morphine. Results from human studies regarding the analgesic effect of M6G are not unanimous. The potency ratio between systemic M6G and morphine in humans has not been settled, but is probably lower than previously assumed. Hitherto, only a few studies have found evidence for a contributory effect of M6G to the overall effects observed after morphine administration. Several studies have demonstrated that administration of M6G is accompanied by fewer and a milder degree of opioid-like side effects than observed after morphine administration, but most of the studies have used lower doses of M6G than of morphine. M3G displays very low affinity for opioid receptors and has no analgesic activity. Animal studies have shown that M3G may antagonize the analgesic effect of morphine and M6G, but no human studies have demonstrated this. M3G has also been connected to certain neurotoxic symptoms, such as hyperalgesia, allodynia and myoclonus, which have been observed after administration of M3G or high doses of morphine in animals. The symptoms have been reported sporadically in humans treated primarily with high doses of morphine, but the role of M3G in eliciting the symptoms is not fully elucidated.

Morphine-3beta-D-glucuronide suppresses inhibitory synaptic transmission in rat substantia gelatinosa

High doses of intrathecally applied morphine or morphine-3beta-D-glucuronide (M3G) produce allodynia and hyperalgesia. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from substantia gelatinosa neurons in transverse slices of adult rat lumbar spinal cord to compare the actions of M3G with those of the mu-opioid agonist, DAMGO ([D-Ala(2),N-Met-Phe(4),Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin), and the ORL(1) agonist, nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ). M3G (1-100 microM) had little or no effect on evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSC) and no effect on postsynaptic membrane conductance. In contrast, 1 microM DAMGO and 1 microM N/OFQ reduced the amplitude of evoked EPSCs and activated an inwardly rectifying K(+) conductance. M3G did not attenuate the effect of DAMGO or N/OFQ on evoked EPSC amplitude. However, 1 to 100 microM M3G reduced the amplitude of evoked GABAergic and glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) by up to 48%. This effect was naloxone-insensitive. The evoked IPSC was also attenuated by DAMGO, but not by N/OFQ. Because M3G reduced the frequency of tetrodotoxin-insensitive miniature IPSCs and increased paired-pulse facilitation, it appeared to act presynaptically to disinhibit substantia gelatinosa neurons. This effect, which does not appear to involve mu-opioid or ORL(1) receptors, may contribute to the allodynia and hyperalgesia observed after intrathecal application of high doses of morphine.

Changing M3G/M6G ratios and pharmacodynamics in a cancer patient during long-term morphine treatment

A cancer patient receiving long-term oral sustained-release morphine treatment and periodically presenting with unusually high plasma M3G/M6G ratios is described. We found the patient's formation of M6G more unstable and perhaps delayed compared to the formation of M3G. There is no apparent explanation for this phenomenon and the high M3G/M6G ratios had no implications for the patient's pain experience or side effects from the morphine treatment.

Morphine-6-glucuronide: an analgesic of the future?

Morphine-6-beta-glucuronide (M6G) is an opioid agonist that plays a role in the clinical effects of morphine. Although M6G probably crosses the blood-brain barrier with difficulty, during long term morphine administration it may reach sufficiently high CNS concentrations to exert clinically relevant opioid effects. As a consequence of its almost exclusive renal elimination, M6G may accumulate in the body of patients with impaired renal function and cause severe opioid adverse effects with insidious onset and long persistence. Its profile of receptor affinities, however, gives reason to speculate that M6G may exhibit analgesic effects while causing fewer adverse effects than morphine. This is supported by reports of the good tolerability of intrathecal and intravenous injections of M6G in humans with intact renal function. M6G may thus be contemplated as an analgesic for short term postoperative analgesia, especially for intrathecal analgesic therapy. In addition, its possibly higher potency than morphine makes M6G a candidate opioid for local or peripheral analgesic therapy. However, current knowledge is too incomplete to finally judge the clinical usefulness of M6G. The next topics for clinical research on M6G should include: (i) a comparison of the potencies of M6G and morphine to cause wanted and unwanted clinical effects; (ii) development of a predictive population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of M6G with calculation of the transfer half-life between plasma and effect site; and (iii) identification of cofactors influencing the action of M6G that can serve as predictors for the clinical outcome of morphine/M6G therapy in an individual including the pharmacogenetics of M6G.

Sex-specific differences in levels of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine antinociception in rats

A number of studies reported striking differences in antinociceptive responses to morphine as a function of sex. Although sex differences in the sensitivity to morphine are widely characterized in rodents, the underlying causes are not identified. Gonadal steroids are believed to contribute to sex differences in response to opioid-induced antinociception. In rats, morphine is metabolized by glucuronidation to morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G). M3G was found to be a functional antagonist of the actions of morphine. Knowledge about the role morphine glucuronides play in sex-specific responses to the antinociceptive effect of morphine may be useful in evaluating therapeutic outcomes of morphine treatment. The purpose of this project was to investigate the effects of sex on the systemic formation of M3G in rats and to correlate glucuronidation variability with differences in antinociceptive responses to morphine. Female rats showed significantly lower morphine-induced antinociception as compared to male rats; 4.6+/-0.5s vs. 11.7+/-2.2s, respectively. Female rats also demonstrated about three-fold higher maximum plasma levels of M3G compared with male rats; 6.2+/-2.2 microg/ml vs. 1.9+/-0.7 microg/ml, respectively. The M3G:morphine AUC ratio was 6.6:1 in female rats and 0.7:1 in male rats. Gonadectomy only partially eliminated sex differences in morphine antinociception and plasma levels of M3G. The results of this study demonstrate that sex and sex differences in the M3G:morphine plasma ratio may play a role in male-female differences observed in morphine antinociception.

Opioid poorly-responsive cancer pain. Part 1: clinical considerations

Pain that is poorly responsive to opioid analgesics is challenging for physicians who deal with cancer patients. Numerous factors may influence analgesic response during the course of the illness. These include changing nociception associated with disease progression, the appearance of intractable side effects, the development of tolerance, the presence of neuropathic pain, the temporal pattern, the effects produced by the production of opioid metabolites, and many others. These factors influence the delicate balance between pain relief and opioid toxicity that must be achieved in cancer patients with pain.

Neuroexcitatory effects of morphine and hydromorphone: evidence implicating the 3-glucuronide metabolites

1. Morphine is recommended by the World Health Organization as the drug of choice for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain. 2. Education of health professionals in the past decade has resulted in a large increase in the prescribing of opioids, such as morphine, and in the magnitude of the doses administered, resulting in an improvement in the quality of pain relief available for many cancer patients. 3. However, the reported incidence of neuroexcitatory side effects (allodynia, myoclonus, seizures) in patients administered large doses of systemic morphine or its structural analogue, hydromorphone (HMOR), has also increased. 4. Clinically, increasing the magnitude of the morphine or HMOR dose administered to patients already exhibiting neuroexcitatory opioid related side effects, results in an exacerbation rather than an attenuation of the excitatory behaviours. 5. In contrast, cessation of the opioid or rotation to a structurally dissimilar opioid (e.g. from morphine/HMOR to methadone or fentanyl), usually results in a restoration of analgesia and resolution of the neuroexcitatory opioid side effects over a period of hours to days. 6. To explain the clinical success of 'opioid rotation', it is essential to understand the in vivo metabolic fate of morphine and HMOR. 7. Following systemic administration, morphine and HMOR are metabolized primarily to the corresponding 3-glucuronide metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and hydromorphone-3-glucuronide (H3G), which are not only devoid of analgesic activity but evoke a range of dose-dependent excitatory behaviours, including allodynia, myoclonus and seizures, following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration to rats. 8. Several studies have shown that, following chronic oral or subcutaneous morphine administration to patients with cancer pain, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of M3G exceed those of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (analgesically active morphine metabolite) by approximately two- and five-fold, respectively. 9. These findings suggest that when the M3G concentration (or H3G by analogy) in the CSF exceeds the neuroexcitatory threshold, excitatory behaviours will be evoked in patients. 10. Thus, rotation of the opioid from morphine/HMOR to a structurally dissimilar opioid, such as methadone or fentanyl, will allow clearance of M3G/H3G from the patient central nervous system over hours to days, thereby producing a time-dependent resolution of the neuroexcitatory behaviours while maintaining analgesia with methadone or fentanyl.

Opioid rotation for cancer pain: rationale and clinical aspects

BACKGROUND

Some patients with cancer pain may develop uncontrolled adverse effects, including generalized myoclonus, delirium, nausea and emesis, or severe sedation before achieving adequate analgesia during opioid dose titration. Sequential therapeutic trials should be considered to determine the most favorable drug.

METHODS

Recent literature was taken into account when reviewing the rationale and potential of opioid rotation.

RESULTS

When aggressive attempts to prevent adverse effects fail, drug rotation should be considered, because sequential therapeutic trials can be useful in identifying the most favorable drug. Different mechanisms, including receptor activity, the asymmetry in cross-tolerance among different opioids, different opioid efficacies, and accumulation of toxic metabolites can explain the differences in analgesic or adverse effect responses among opioids in a clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

When pain is relieved inadequately by opioid analgesics given in a dose that causes intolerable side effects despite routine measures to control them, treatment with the same opioid by an alternative route or with an alternative opioid administered by the same route should be considered. Opioid rotation may be useful in opening the therapeutic window and for establishing a more advantageous analgesia/toxicity relationship. By substituting opioids and using lower doses than expected according to the equivalency conversion tables, it is possible in the majority of cases to reduce or relieve the symptoms of opioid toxicity in those patients who were highly tolerant to previous opioids while improving analgesia and, as a consequence, the opioid responsiveness.

Steady-state kinetics and dynamics of morphine in cancer patients: is sedation related to the absorption rate of morphine?

Eighteen patients suffering from chronic pain due to cancer completed a balanced, double-blind, double-dummy, two period cross-over trial comparing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of morphine and its metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, after administration of morphine given as controlled-release (CR) tablets (every 12 h) and immediate-release (IR) tablets (every 6 h). The same total daily dose of morphine was given in both study periods. Patients received both test formulations for 4 days and on the final day of each period, peripheral venous blood samples for analysis of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, and morphine-6-glucuronide were obtained. Pain intensity, sedation, and continuous reaction time (CRT) were assessed. No significant differences could be demonstrated in AUC/dose, Cmin, Cmax or fluctuation index values between the two treatments (IR and CR tablets) for either morphine or its metabolites. Tmax for morphine and its metabolites occurred significantly later after administration of CR tablets than after administration of IR tablets. There were no significant differences between the IR and the CR formulation with respect to analgesia and side effects, and there was no difference in the patients' overall impression of the two treatments. More important, there was no difference between the Tmax and the time to peak sedation after administration of IR tablets (P = 0.63). However, due to the relatively small number of patients and the variability in the data, the statistical power of the test was only 0.074. The risk of a type II error is 0.926. These data demonstrate the PK and PD similarities and differences between CR and IR morphine. They suggest that there may be a relationship between Tmax (determined by absorption rate) and sedation, but further evaluation of this potential relationship is needed.

Brain region-specific studies of the excitatory behavioral effects of morphine-3-glucuronide

This study was designed to determine in rats whether morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) produces its neuro-excitatory effects most potently in the ventral hippocampus (as has been reported previously for subanalgesic doses of opioid peptides). Guide cannulae were implanted into one of seven regions of the rat brain: lateral ventricle; ventral, CA1 and CA2-CA3 regions of the hippocampus; amygdala; striatum or cortex. After a 7 day recovery period, rats received intracerebral injections of (i) M3G (1.1 or 11 nmol) (ii) DADLE ([D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin), (45 nmol, positive controls) or (iii) vehicle (deionised water), and behavioral excitation was quantified over 80 min. High-dose M3G (11 nmol) evoked behavioral excitation in all brain regions but the onset, severity and duration of these effects varied considerably among brain regions. By contrast, low-dose M3G (1.1 nmol) evoked excitatory behaviors only when administered into the ventral hippocampus and the amygdala, with the most potent effects being observed in the ventral hippocampus. Prior administration of the nonselective opioid antagonists, naloxone and beta-funaltrexamine into the ventral hippocampus, markedly attenuated low-dose M3G's excitatory effects but did not significantly alter levels of excitation evoked by high-dose M3G. Naloxone given 10 min after M3G (1.1 or 11 nmol) did not significantly attenuate behavioral excitation. Thus, M3G's excitatory behavioral effects occur most potently in the ventral hippocampus as reported previously for subanalgesic doses of opioid peptides, and appear to be mediated through at least two mechanisms, one possibly involving excitatory opioid receptors and the other, non-opioid receptors.

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

Analgesic responses to intrathecal morphine in relation to CSF concentrations of morphine-3,beta-glucuronide and morphine-6,beta-glucuronide

This study was performed to determine whether variations in analgesic responses to intrathecal morphine could be explained by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of morphine metabolites. Twenty-four CSF samples were collected at the beginning, middle and end of treatment periods in seven cancer patients with pain of malignant origin. CSF concentrations of morphine-3,beta-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6,beta-glucuronide (M6G) metabolites were measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Analgesic responses to morphine were estimated concurrent with CSF collection using a visual analog scale representing percentages of pain relief. Effective analgesia was defined as > or = 75% pain relief. CSF concentration of M3G and M6G in the 24 samples were 722 +/- 116 ng/ml and 699 +/- 158 ng/ml, respectively. CSF samples were categorized into two groups: (1) those collected during effective analgesia (N=14), and (2) those collected during ineffective analgesia (N=10). M6G levels detected in group 1 samples (effective analgesia) were significantly greater than those found in group 2 samples (ineffective analgesia) (978 +/- 243 ng/ml vs 309 +/- 68 ng/ml, P<0.05). Intergroup differences in CSF M3G concentrations and M3G/M6G ratios were not significant. It is concluded that CSF M6G may be indicative of effectiveness of analgesia in cancer patients subjected to intrathecal morphine.

The role of morphine glucuronides in cancer pain

Morphine metabolites are involved in various ways in determining the complex effects of morphine, both favourable and adverse, and may complicate the clinical use of morphine in the treatment of cancer pain. The production and effects of the principal morphine metabolites, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide, in both normal and pathological states have been reviewed in the current literature. Therapeutic implications are also reviewed on the basis of experimental and clinical reports. The presence of these metabolites should be recognized in the chronic treatment of cancer pain with morphine, especially in the presence of renal impairment, and should be considered to have an important influence on opioid responsiveness, defined as a balance between the achievement of an optimal analgesia and the occurrence of adverse effects.

Is development of hyperalgesia, allodynia and myoclonus related to morphine metabolism during long-term administration? Six case histories

BACKGROUND

Recently, clinical reports have suggested a relationship between the occurrence of hyperalgesia, allodynia and/or myoclonus and treatment with high doses of morphine in humans. Although few clinical descriptions of these phenomena are available, experimental work supports the notion that high doses of morphine may play a pathogenetic role in the observed behavioural syndrome.

METHODS

Six patients, four with malignant and two with chronic, non-malignant pain conditions, treated with moderate to high doses of oral, continuous intravenous infusion or intrathecal morphine developed hyperalgesia, allodynia and/or myoclonus. When the side-effects occurred, blood or CSF samples were taken and analyzed for contents of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G).

RESULTS

When comparing the plasma and CSF concentrations from these patients with data from available literature obtained from patients not suffering from these side-effects, it was demonstrated that the values deviated in five patients. In all six patients, the side-effects disappeared after substituting morphine with other opioid agonists or after lowering the daily dose of morphine.

CONCLUSION

These results may indicate that elevated concentrations of M-3-G in plasma as well as the plasma and CSF M-3-G/M-6-G ratios may play a pathogenetic role in the development of hyperalgesia, allodynia and myoclonus.

Morphine-3-glucuronide has a minor effect on morphine antinociception. Pharmacodynamic modeling

The objective of this study was to quantify the influence of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) on the morphine antinociceptive effect (ANE) and respiratory effects in the rat. Three groups of rats were pretreated with either saline or M3G at two different rates. Morphine infusion of 10 mg/h/kg (group A) or 20 mg/h/kg (group B) was administered to each pretreatment group for 3 h. The ANE was measured by the electrical stimulation vocalization method, and blood gas parameters (pCO2, pO2, and pH) were assessed. Independent of pretreatment all groups displayed a concurrent increase in the ANE. The maximal effect diverged between pretreatments. Acute tolerance was observed, but no rebound effect was detected. To characterize the ANE, an effect compartment model and an indirect response model were selected, both capable of describing the observed features. In both models incorporation of M3G led to a better explanation of the data. On the basis of the parameters obtained in the fits, naturally occurring M3G would reduce the antinociceptive effect during a morphine infusion (plasma concentration 15 microM) by 15-20%. The exposure of M3G did not significantly change the respiratory response following the morphine treatment.

Influence of ranitidine on the morphine-3-glucuronide to morphine-6-glucuronide ratio after oral administration of morphine in humans

1. In humans morphine is metabolised to morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) which possess no opioid activity, and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) which is a potent opioid receptor agonist that probably contribute to the desired as well as toxic effects of morphine. 2. In order to investigate the possible effect of ranitidine on morphine glucuronidation indicated by clinical studies and later confirmed in vitro, a double blind cross-over study on eight human volunteers administered oral morphine plus ranitidine or placebo was conducted. 3. Urine was collected in fractions for 24 h. Serum and urine samples were prepared by solid phase extraction and morphine, M3G and M6G were quantified by HPLC. 4. Ranitidine significantly reduced the individual serum M3G/M6G ratio, and tended to increase the serum AUC(0-90) of morphine. In contrast, ranitidine had no significant effect on the urinary M3G/M6G ratio. The urinary recovery of morphine or morphine glucuronides was unaffected by ranitidine. 5 Possible explanations to the apparent incongruity between the serum and urine data are discussed.

Predictive factors and opioid responsiveness in cancer pain

The management of cancer pain not readily responsive to morphine is often problematic. Several factors can interfere with an appropriate analgesic opioid response in the course of the illness, including the progression of the disease and tolerance, the appearance of intractable side-effects, type and temporal pattern of pain, morphine metabolites, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors, as well as individual factors. Different methodologies capable of accurately predicting or monitoring opioid response have been proposed in an attempt to allow researchers to 'speak a common language'. Tolerance is a component of the concept of opioid responsiveness. However, the assessment of analgesic tolerance in cancer patients is constrained by numerous difficulties because of the changes in the noxious stimuli with increasing activity in nociceptive pathways.

A pharmacodynamic study of morphine and its glucuronide metabolites after single morphine dosing in cancer patients with pain

Eleven morphine naïve patients with cancer-related pain were given a single dose of either intravenous morphine (n = 5) or oral morphine (n = 6). Blood sampling was performed over a 24-hr period and serial pain assessments were made using a categorical scale. Plasma samples were analyzed for morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G), morphine-3-glucuronide (M-3-G), and normorphine using high-performance liquid chromatography. In neither the intravenous nor oral group was there a correlation between analgesia duration and the half-lives of morphine and M-6-G. There was no correlation between the time to peak analgesia and time to peak concentration for morphine or M-6-G. There was no significant difference in absolute concentrations of M-6-G or M-3-6 nor in the ratio of M-3-G to M-6-G at peak analgesia versus relapse.

Morphine metabolites

Morphine is a potent opioid analgesic widely used for the treatment of acute pain and for long-term treatment of severe pain. Morphine is a member of the morphinan-framed alkaloids, which are present in the poppy plant. The drug is soluble in water, but its solubility in lipids is poor. In man, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) are the major metabolites of morphine. The metabolism of morphine occurs not only in the liver, but may also take place in the brain and the kidneys. The glucuronides are mainly eliminated via bile and urine. Glucuronides as a rule are considered as highly polar metabolites unable to cross the blood-brain barrier. Although morphine glucuronidation has been demonstrated in human brain tissue, the capacity is very low compared to that of the liver, indicating that the M3G and M6G concentrations observed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after systemic administration reflect hepatic metabolism of morphine and that the morphine glucuronides, despite their high polarity, can penetrate into the brain. Like morphine, M6G has been shown to be relatively more selective for mu-receptors than for delta- and kappa-receptors while M3G does not appear to compete for opioid receptor binding. The analgesic properties of M6G were recognised in the early 1970s and more recent work suggests that M6G might significantly contribute to the opioid analgesia after administration of morphine. The analgesic potency of M6G after intracerebroventricular (ICV) or intrathecal (IT) administration in rats is from 45-800 timer greater than that of morphine, depending on the animal species and the experimental antinociceptive test used. Furthermore, the development of a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay for the quantitative determination of morphine, M6G and M3G has revealed that M6G and M3G were present in abundance after chronic oral morphine administration and that the area under the plasma concentration-time curve exceeded that of morphine. M3G has been found to antagonise morphine and M6G induced analgesia and ventilatory depression in the rat, which has led to the hypothesis that M3G may influence the development of morphine tolerance. M3G exhibits no analgesic effect after ICV or IT administration. Some studies do, however, indicate that M3G may cause non-opioid mediated hyperalgesia/allodynia and convulsions after IT administration in rats. These observations led to the hypothesis that M3G might be responsible for side-effects, hyperalgesia/allodynia and myoclonus seen after high-dose morphine treatment.

Concentrations of morphine and morphine metabolites in CSF and plasma during continuous subcutaneous morphine administration in cancer pain patients

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) steady-state concentrations (Css) of morphine (M) and the main metabolites morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 21 cancer patients treated with chronic subcutaneous morphine infusion. There was a moderate, but statistically significant correlation between the daily dose of morphine and the concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF. A poorer correlation to concentrations were seen in plasma. The mean +/- SEM CSF/plasma morphine concentration ratio was 0.36 +/- 0.07. In plasma and CSF, the mean steady state concentration of M3G but not M6G substantially exceeded that of morphine where the mean CSF M/M3G/M6G ratio was 1:15:0.5 (molar basis), and the mean plasma ratio was M/M3G/M6G 1:31:3 (molar basis). The mean M3G and M6G concentrations in CSF were approximately 8 and 10% of those found in plasma, but there was a wide interindividual variation. Plasma concentrations of both morphine glucuronides were positively correlated to serum creatinine. Neither pain intensity, evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS), nor side effects showed any relationship to the CSF M3G concentrations, M3G/M or the M3G/M6G ratios. We conclude that during steady state subcutaneous administration of morphine, there is a large interindividual variation in plasma morphine with poor relationship to the daily administered dose. In CSF this correlation was more evident. Plasma and CSF concentrations of M3G and CSF concentrations of M6G correlated with administered morphine dose. There was an accumulation of both morphine glucuronides in patients with elevated serum creatinine. Measurements of morphine, M3G and M6G in CSF did not show any overt relationship to analgesia or side effects.

Long-term effects of continuous intrathecal opioid treatment in chronic pain of nonmalignant etiology

In the present retrospective investigation, the long-term effects of continuous intrathecal opioid therapy via implantable infusion pump systems were examined in 120 patients with chronic, nonmalignant pain syndromes. The follow-up period was 6 months to 5.7 years (mean 3.4 years +/- 1.3 standard error of the mean). Deafferentation pain and neuropathic pain showed the best long-term results, with 68% and 62% pain reduction (visual analog scale), respectively. The mean morphine dosage initially administered was 2.7 mg/day (range 0.3-12 mg/day); after an average of 3.4 years, it was 4.7 mg/day (range 0.3-12 mg/day). In a long-term observation of 28 patients who received intrathecal morphine for longer than 4 years. 18 patients (64.3%) had a constant dosage history and 10 patients (35.7%) showed an increase in morphine dosage to more than 6 mg/day 1 year after dosage determination. In seven cases, a tolerance developed: in four patients the tolerance was controlled by means of "drug holidays"; but in three patients it was necessary to remove the pump systems. Explantation of the pump system occurred in 22 additional cases for other reasons. Throughout the follow-up period, 74.2% of the patients profited from the intrathecal opiate therapy: the average pain reduction after 6 months was 67.4% and, as of the last follow-up examination, it was 58.1%. Ninety-two percent of the patients were satisfied with the therapy and 81% reported an improvement in their quality of life. The authors' 6-year experience with administration of intrathecal opioid medications for nonmalignant pain should encourage the use of this method in carefully selected patients.

Individualized use of methadone and opioid rotation in the comprehensive management of cancer pain associated with poor prognostic indicators

This case report describes a patient affected by a neuropathic pain syndrome, which was secondary to a renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the spine, and complicated by incidental components and somatization. Due to a rapid development of tolerance and toxicity from hydromorphone, a rotation to methadone was made, with a decrease of the morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) from 1050 to 36. After 4 mos of good pain relief, a switch over back to hydromorphone was necessary due to worsening pain, associated with myoclonus and sedation secondary to methadone; the MEDD this time escalated from 480 to 4950. The use of hydromorphone was complicated by the onset of intractable nausea and sedation. After 2 wks, the patient was rotated again to methadone, with a decrease of the MEDD to 24. He achieved good pain control and was free of opioid toxicity. Our findings illustrate a role of methadone in the management of cancer pain associated with poor prognostic indicators, the development of tolerance towards its effects, and the regaining of sensitivity to methadone, by temporary rotation to another opioid. Possible mechanism for opioid tolerance and its reversal are discussed.

Pharmacokinetics of morphine and its glucuronides after intravenous infusion of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide in healthy volunteers

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide (M-6-G) after intravenous administration of either morphine or M-6-G were determined in healthy volunteers. With a dosing regimen calculated on the basis of data obtained in a first series of experiments in four subjects (morphine: intravenous loading dose of 0.24 mg/kg for 5 minutes and an intravenous infusion of 0.069 mg.kg-1.hr-1 for 4 hours; M-6-G: loading dose of 0.011 mg/kg for 5 minutes and an infusion of 0.006 mg.kg-1.hr-1 for 4 hours), it was possible to yield plasma concentrations of morphine and M-6-G in another four subjects close to predefined targeted levels (35 and 45.5 ng/ml morphine and M-6-G, respectively). This dosing regimen may be used in further pharmacodynamic studies to compare the analgesic effects of morphine and M-6-G. In addition, metabolite kinetics of M-6-G were calculated as a function of time with use of a linear systems approach to the estimation of rate and fraction of morphine glucuronidation to M-6-G.

Management of painful paraneoplastic syndromes

The majority of patients with advanced malignant disease experience pain, so pain is commonly present in patients with paraneoplastic syndromes. It is rare, however, that the pain itself is a paraneoplastic manifestation of cancer. Usually, the pain in this context is associated with a paraneoplastic syndrome but is not a direct result of that syndrome. Three syndromes in which pain is part of the syndrome and a paraneoplastic manifestation of malignant disease--neuropathy, ganglionitis, and monolitis--have been described in the literature. These syndromes and their management are discussed in this article.