Macromolecular binding of aldosterone in the toad bladder

Receptor mediated mineralocorticoid action in alga cell mutants

The multiplication of Chlamydomonas cells can be arrested by the spirolactone derivative RU 26752 and this is fully reversible by the natural hormone aldosterone. Continuous growth in the presence of RU 26752 led to the isolation of a population subsequently resistant to the action of mineralocortoid analogues, due possibly to the selection of mutant cells. Immunophotochemical evidence is provided for a 52 kDa protein that possesses functional steroid and DNA binding domains. Alga cells therefore appear to respond to steroid hormones in a manner similar to the mammalian systems, possibly via a receptor that may represent a pygmy ancestor of the latter day steroid receptor superfamily.

Steroid hormone receptors

In the three decades since the original discovery of receptors for steroid hormones, much has been learned about the biochemical processes by which these regulatory agents exert their effects in target tissues. The intracellular receptor proteins are potential transcription factors, needed for optimal gene expression in hormone-dependent cells. They are present in an inactive form until association with the hormone converts them to a functional state that can react with target genes. Transformation of the receptor protein to the nuclear binding form appears to involve the removal of both macromolecular and micromolecular factors that act to keep the receptor form reacting with DNA. Much of the native receptor is present in the nucleus, loosely bound and readily extractable, but for some and possibly all steroid hormones, some receptor is in the cytoplasm, perhaps in equilibrium with a nuclear pool. Methods have been developed for the stabilization, purification, and characterization of receptor proteins, and through cloning and sequencing of their cDNAs, primary structures for these receptors are now known. This has led to the recognition of structural similarities among the family of receptors for the different steroid hormones and to the identification of regions in the protein molecule responsible for the various aspects of their function. Monoclonal antibodies recognizing specific molecular domains are available for most receptors. Despite the knowledge that has been acquired, many important questions remain unsolved. How does association with the steroid remove factors keeping the receptor protein in its native state, and how does binding of the transformed receptor to the response element in the promoter region enhance gene transcription? Once it has converted the receptor to the nuclear binding state, is there a further role for the steroid in modulating transcription? Still not entirely clear is the involvement of phosphorylation and/or dephosphorylation in hormone binding, receptor transformation, and transcriptional activation. Less vital to basic understanding but important in the overall picture is whether the native receptors for gonadal hormones are entirely confined to the nucleus or whether there is an intracellular distribution equilibrium. With the effort now being devoted to this field, and with the application of new experimental techniques, especially those of molecular biology, our understanding of receptor function is progressing rapidly. The precise mechanism of steroid hormone action should soon be completely established.

Binding of aldosterone to cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors of the urinary bladder epithelium of Bufo marinus

Binding of aldosterone to cytoplasmic and nuclear sites in urinary bladder epithelia of Bufo marinus (Dominican variant) is saturable and dependent upon steroid concentration. Scatchard analysis of specific cytoplasmic binding yielded a maximal binding capacity (N) of 14.5 X 10(-14) mol/mg protein and an apparent equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 1.4 X 10(-8) M. Since Scatchard analysis of specific nuclear binding was complex, this binding was resolved by a computer-generated cirve-fitting technique which analyzed total aldosterone bound. Nuclear binding was resolved into three sites: a nonsaturable site that was linearly dependent upon aldosterone concentration, and two saturable sites (types I and II). Type I sites had relatively low capacity for aldosterone (N = 31 +/- 1 X 10(-14) mol/mg DNA) and high affinity (Kd = 2.5 +/- 0.5 X 10(-9 M); tffininty (Kd = 8.6 +/- 1.7 X 10(-7) M). Competition for [3H]aldosterone binding by dexamethasone, corticosterone, cortisol, progesterone, testosterone, and 17 beta-estradiol demonstrated that type I nuclear sites have higher affinity for aldosterone than for other steroids. The findings are consistent with the inference that the type I site is the mineralocorticoid receptor.

Aldosterone receptor occupancy and sodium transport in the urinary bladder of Bufo marinus

The concentration dependence of binding of [3H]aldosterone to cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors was evaluated in urinary bladder epithelial cells of Colombian toads. One class of specific sites (sensitive to displacement by excess aldosterone) was detected in the cytosol. However, two classes of specific nuclear [3H]aldosterone binding sites were evident. In the nucleus, high-affinity (Kd = 2.7 X 10(-9) M), low-capacity (N = 15 X 10(-14) mol/mg DNA) sites (type I) were completely saturated at approximately 4 X 10(-8) M aldosterone, a concentration which gave a maximal increase in short-circuit current (SCC). Occupancy of low-affinity (Kd = 4.6 X 10(-7) M), high-capacity sites (N = 150 X 10(-14) mol/mg DNA) (type II) occurred at higher steroid concentrations and did not correlate with further increase in SCC. Binding parameters of Colombian and Dominican variants of Bufo marinus were compared. In both variants, the SCC increase elicited by aldosterone correlated with accumulation of type I complexes in the nucleus, but the relationship was markedly nonlinear. Various alternatives were considered as the basis for a curvilinear dependence of the increment in Na+ transport on abundance of nuclear type I complexes.

Identification and properties of renal mineralocorticoid receptors in relation to glucocorticoid binders in rat liver and kidney

The binding of the natural mineralocorticoid aldosterone and the glucocorticoid corticosterone to macromolecules in rat liver and kidney cytoplasmic fractions was compared by various chromatographic procedures. Equilibration of kidney cytosol with 10nM-aldosterone, either alone or in the presence of a competing steroid, was ideal for ionexchange chromatography of DEAE-cellulose DE-52, and revealed the presence of four sorts of binding components. One of these, eluted in the 0.001M-phosphate pre-wash, and another, less abundant, forming a peak at 0.006M-phosphate, did not bind corticosterone at equimolar concentrations, and appear to constitute the mineralocorticoid-specific 'MR' receptor in rat kidney. They could not be detected in the liver. Radioactivity eluted in the 0.02 and 0.06M-phosphate regions on DEAE-cellulose DE-52 appears to be due to [3H]aldosterone binding to glucocorticoid-specific 'GR' receptors and to transcortin respectively, since labelling was greater with corticosterone even at 10 nM than with the mineralocorticoid at 100nM and since [14C]corticosterone bound to blood serum transcortin was always co-chromatographed in the 0.06M-phosphate region. These two components appear to be identical with those in the liver and could be labelled maximally only by 100nM-corticosterone. The separation between specific mineralo- and glucocorticoid-binding species was less clear when chromatography was attempted on DEAE-Sephadex A-50 columns, possibly because of disaggregation into subunits in the presence of the high KC1 concentrations required for elution. Competitive binding followed by filtration through Sephadex G-200 gel indicated that cellular MR binders, unlike GR receptors, exist mostly as high-molecular-weight aggregates, although both appear to exhibit a comparable monomeric molecular weight of approx. 67000.