Burns complicated with gastrointestinal haemorrhage--an analysis of 70 cases

Colonic perforation following major burns: Experience from a burns center and a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Major burns complicated by stress ulceration and perforation of the stomach or duodenum is a recognized clinical phenomenon. Colonic perforation in burns patients is not common, and the overall incidence, diagnosis, intervention undertaken and mortality is incompletely described in the literature.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review of the literature on severe burns resulting in colonic perforation during the initial admission period. Relevant studies from January 1975 to June 2020 were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Patient demographics, co-morbidities, total body surface area (TBSA) and anatomical region of burn, site of colonic perforation and management, nutrition, sepsis and microbiology, length of stay and overall outcome were extracted. We present a case series of five burns patients who had colonic perforations in our Specialist Burns Center.

RESULTS

We identified 54 studies, of which nine (two case series and seven case reports) met the inclusion criteria. Colonic perforation following burns was most common in middle-aged male patients with a proportion of patients having a history of mental health issues. In most cases, the TBSA associated with a colonic perforation was ≥30% (11/16 patients, 69%). Perforations mainly affected the right side of the colon (12/16 patients, 75%), usually occurring after the second week of admission (13/16 patients, 81%). Right-sided colonic perforations were associated with an increased mortality rate compared to left-sided perforations (42% vs 25%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature is mainly limited to case series and case reports and confirms that colonic perforations in burns patients are rare. Colonic perforations are related to the systemic effect of burn injuries including sepsis and gastrointestinal stasis. We have identified patients who are at higher risk of developing colonic perforations and have described the common findings in these patients. Through greater awareness early diagnosis and prompt intervention may be achieved to improve outcomes and reduce associated morbidity and mortality.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Pediatric Burn Patients: Is It Worth the Risk?

OBJECTIVES

Examine the outcomes of pediatric burn patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to determine whether extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered in this special population.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

All extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers reporting to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization.

SUBJECTS

Pediatric patients (birth to younger than 18 yr) who were supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with a burn diagnosis between 1990 and 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 113 patients were identified from the registry by inclusion criteria. Patients cannulated for respiratory failure had the highest survival (55.7%, n = 97) compared to those supported for cardiac failure (33.3%, n = 6) or extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (30%, n = 10). Patients supported on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure had the best overall survival at 62.2% (n = 37). Important for the burn population, rates of surgical site bleeding were similar to other surgical patients placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at 22.1%. Cardiac arrest prior to cannulation was associated with increased hospital mortality (odds ratio, 3.41; 95% CI, 0.16-1.01; p = 0.048). Following cannulation, complications including the need for inotropes (odds ratio, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.24-5.65; p = 0.011), presence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage (p = 0.049), and hyperglycemia (glucose > 240 mg/dL) (odds ratio, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.13-10.38; p = 0.024) were associated with increased mortality. Of patients with documented burn percentage of total body surface area (n = 19), survival was 70% when less than 60% total body surface area was involved.

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation could be considered as an additional level of support for the pediatric burn population, especially in the setting of respiratory failure. Additional studies are necessary to determine the optimal timing of cannulation and other patient characteristics that may impact outcomes.

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis: Reducing Non-Indicated Prescribing After Hospital Discharge

Background:

Gastric acid suppressant medications used as stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often prescribed inappropriately after discharge. We present tools to reduce the use and cost of non-indicated SUP.

Objective:

To reduce the non-indicated use of SUP after hospital discharge originally started in the ICU, using an education intervention and pharmacist-led medication reconciliation on patient care rounds and at hospital discharge.

Methods:

In a retrospective medical record review using a historic control, 356 consecutively admitted patients to the medical/surgical ICU at the University of Wisconsin Hospital were assessed for the appropriate use of SUP at admission to the ICU, at transfer to a general care unit, and at hospital discharge. The education intervention involved teaching both the medical and pharmacist staff about indications for SUP using a memorandum and a pocket guide. Pharmacists also conducted medication reconciliation during daily patient care rounds and at discharge to justify medication use. The outcome of this study is the percentage of patients prescribed non-indicated gastric acid suppressants at hospital discharge. This outcome is compared to a previous study conducted at our hospital.

Results:

Of 356 eligible patients, 308 (86.5%) received SUP while in the ICU. Thirty-nine (11%) were given continuing SUP after discharge from the hospital, of which 31 (8.7%) had no clear indication. This was a 64.3% reduction from the 24.4% found in the prior study (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

Educational materials that guide prescribing, pharmacist interaction on patient care rounds, and pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation significantly reduced the prescribing of non-indicated gastric acid suppressant medications after hospital discharge.

Cecal perforation in thermal injury: case report and review of the literature

Gastrointestinal complications in burn patients include ileus, constipation, hemorrhage from ulcerations, ischemic bowel, and rarely, perforations. Patients with hypotensive episodes and sepsis are at risk for developing ischemic bowel disease. There have been three reports in the literature of cecal perforation in burn patients. We present an additional case and review of the literature.

Risk factors for clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

In duplicate, blinded adjudicators determined the presence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding using a priori criteria, evaluating relevant clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic data. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to examine baseline and time-dependent risk factors for bleeding.

SETTING

Sixteen university-affiliated intensive care units (ICUs) in Canada.

PATIENTS

A total of 1,077 critically ill ICU patients ventilated for at least 48 hrs.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to stress ulcer prophylaxis with intravenous ranitidine or nasogastric sucralfate; otherwise, management was at the discretion of the ICU team.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographic data included patient characteristics, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) score. Each day in the ICU, physiologic measurements including MOD score, feeding, and other treatment variables were recorded. The significant risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the univariable analyses were low platelet count, maximum serum creatinine, maximum MOD score, maximum pulmonary component of the MOD score, maximum hepatic component of the MOD score, maximum renal component of the MOD score, enteral nutrition, and stress ulcer prophylaxis with ranitidine. The only independent predictors of bleeding in the multivariable analysis were maximum serum creatinine (relative risk = 1.16 [95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.32]), enteral nutrition (relative risk = 0.30 [95% confidence interval = 0.13-0.67]), and ranitidine administration (relative risk = 0.39 [95% confidence interval = 0.17-0.83]).

CONCLUSIONS

In critically ill ventilated patients, renal failure was independently associated with an increased risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, whereas enteral nutrition and stress ulcer prophylaxis with ranitidine conferred significantly lower bleeding rates.

Upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in critically ill pediatric patients

Similar to adults, children under physiologic stress can develop an imbalance in defensive (mucosal layer, motility) and aggressive (gastric acid, bile salts, enzymes) factors responsible for maintaining a healthy gastrointestinal tract. Hypoxia in the gastrointestinal tract likely disrupts the defensive factors, thereby permitting damage by aggressive factors to upper gastrointestinal epithelium that may progress to stress ulceration and acute upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB). The basic pathophysiology may be similar in children and adults; however, differences in the time to developing ulceration, ulcer location, and number of ulcers have been reported. Functional development of the gastrointestinal tract is influenced by disease, gestational and postnatal age, and exposure to and type of enteral feedings, thereby confounding the development and prophylaxis of UGIB in neonates and infants. In addition, pharmacotherapy decisions are often complicated by drug administration issues and adverse effects.

The value of early enteral nutrition in the prophylaxis of stress ulceration in the severely burned patient

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed to compare the frequency of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in seriously burned patients treated with either cimetidine and antacids or enteral nutrition for ulcer prophylaxis. Five hundred and twenty-six seriously burned patients admitted to the burn intensive care unit of the BG Trauma Centre Ludwigshafen during a 4-year period were included into the study. All patients admitted to the burn unit from 1989 to 1991 received i.v. cimetidine (400 mg q4) for ulcer prophylaxis. If the intragastric pH dropped below 3.5, gastric pH was titrated with antacids up to > or = 4 via nasogastric tube. During the second 2-year period (1992-1993) early enteral nutrition alone was regarded to be ulcer protective and no further interventions for ulcer prophylaxis were routinely performed. Signs of overt upper GIB were monitored and documented through the entire study period. The overall occurrence rate of upper GIB in the cimetidine/antacids (C/A) group (n = 253) was 8.3 per cent with six cases of serious bleeding in five patients (1.98 per cent). In the enteral nutrition (EN) group (n = 273) the overall incidence of GIB was 3.3 per cent with two cases of serious bleeding (0.73 per cent). There were no deaths directly related to ulcer haemorrhage. The difference in the overall frequency of overt GIB between the groups studied was statistically significant (< 0.05). In our experience, early enteral nutrition is effective in the prevention of stress haemorrhage in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Additional medicinal prophylaxis is not required in burn patients.

Continuous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration for acute renal failure in severely burned patients

Among 970 burned patients admitted between April 1987 and September 1994, 16 (1.6 per cent) presented acute renal failure requiring dialytic support and were treated by continuous renal replacement therapy as first-line modality. Their mean burned surface area was 58.0 +/- 5.7 per cent. Acute renal failure mainly occurred in the second week following admission in relation to sepsis and nephrotoxic drugs. Four types of continuous renal replacement therapy were performed: continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration (CAVH and CAVHDF) and continuous venovenous haemofiltration and haemodiafiltration (CVVH and CVVHDF). Compared to 33 critically ill patients without burns also treated for acute renal failure by continuous haemofiltration or haemodiafiltration during the same period, the mean duration of therapy was longer for the burned patients (24.2 +/- 9.4 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.8 days). Although mean urine outputs and ultrafiltration rates were similar for both groups, fluid administration was higher for burned patients (8.2 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.2 l/day). Total weight loss during therapy was significantly greater in burned patients (12.6 +/- 3.6 vs. 6.8 +/- 1.0 kg), in relation to longer treatment period. Bleeding complications were more frequent in burned patients (56 vs. 15 per cent). Mortality rates were similar in both groups (82 vs. 82 per cent). In conclusion, when aggressive initial fluid resuscitation is applied following burn injury, the occurrence of acute renal failure is low, delayed and multifactorial. Since they are haemodynamically well tolerated and provide a good metabolic and volaemic control, continuous renal replacement therapies appear to be useful modalities for burned patients with acute renal failure. However, as bleeding complications are more frequent, careful monitoring is necessary.

Caecal perforation in a burn patient

A 30-year-old female with a 38 per cent TBSA flame burn developed caecal perforation due to non-specific colonic ulceration. Only one such case has so far been reported in the literature by Still et al. (Burns 1994; 20: 85). The caecal perforation in our patient was treated using a right hemicolectomy. She deteriorated postoperatively and died day 21 postburn due to septicaemia, the perforation of the caecum contributed to the mortality.

Caecal perforation due to colonic ulcer in a burn patient

Non-specific ulcers of the colon are occasionally reported as a cause of perforation of the colon. No previous cases have been reported in burn patients as a cause of perforation, although cases of haemorrhage have been cited. A 42-year-old black-skinned female with a 26 per cent TBSA burn developed a caecal perforation from this cause. Treatment with caecostomy patient recovered successfully.