Development of cholinergic traits in the quail ciliary ganglion: expression of choline acetyltransferase-like immunoreactivity

Innervation of rat iris by trigeminal and ciliary neurons expressing pChAT, a novel splice variant of choline acetyltransferase

We have recently discovered a splice variant of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) mRNA and designated the variant protein pChAT because of its preferential expression in peripheral neuronal structures. In this study, the presence of pChAT in rat iris was examined by immunohistochemistry and Western blot using a pChAT antiserum, in combination with RT-PCR analysis and ChAT enzyme assay. For comparison, the conventional ChAT (cChAT) was studied in parallel. By pChAT immunohistochemistry, intense labeling was found to occur in nerve fibers of the iris and in neurons of the ciliary and trigeminal ganglia. Denervation studies, analyzed by semiquantitative morphometry, indicated that these iridial pChAT fibers originated about half from the ciliary ganglion and the other half from the trigeminal ganglion. The presence of pChAT protein in the iris and trigeminal ganglion was confirmed by Western blot. The expression of pChAT mRNA in the ciliary and trigeminal ganglia was proved by RT-PCR. Although cChAT protein and mRNA were detected in the ciliary ganglion, neither was detectable in the trigeminal ganglion. The contributions of the ciliary and trigeminal ganglia to the iridial ChAT enzyme activity were verified by the present ChAT assay. Here, we provide evidence that iridial pChAT nerves are composed of postganglionic parasympathetic efferents from the ciliary ganglion and, more interestingly, somatic sensory afferents of the trigeminal ophthalmic nerve.

Age-dependent neurotransmitter plasticity of ciliary ganglion neurons

We have examined neurotransmitter plasticity in postmitotic cholinergic neurons isolated from 6.5- to 11-day-old embryonic quail ciliary ganglia. Purified neurons were labeled with DiI, transplanted into the trunk of young chick embryos, and assayed for catecholamine content and [3H]thymidine uptake 4 to 5 days later. For ciliary neurons derived from 6.5- to 8-day-old embryos, as many as 25% (average of 9% overall) expressed catecholamines in the host sympathetic ganglia, migratory stream, aortic plexuses, and adrenal medulla. In contrast, neurons from >8-day-old ganglia did not acquire or produce detectable catecholamines, indicating a limited time period over which phenotypic conversion can occur in vivo. As a control, ciliary neurons were also injected into the head mesenchyme of young embryos; no catecholamine expression was observed. Interestingly, after transplantation some DiI-labeled postmitotic ciliary neurons took up [3H]thymidine with or without phenotypic change. These results suggest that phenotypic plasticity in ciliary neurons is age-dependent, is location-dependent, and may involve resumption of DNA replication, a characteristic feature of some differentiating adrenergic sympathetic neurons. Apoptosis of a few proliferating transplanted cells may be induced independently or in association with transmitter change.

Target tissue influence on somatostatin expression in the avian ciliary ganglion

Activin as a neurodifferentiation factor. Our studies of neurotransmitter expression have focused on the expression of neuropeptide transmitters in the avian ciliary ganglion (CG) and have examined the influence of choroidal vascular smooth muscle cells in regulating the differential expression of somatostatin in the CG. In these activities we have identified activin A as a potential target-derived neurodifferentiation factor that can stimulate somatostatin expression in cultured CG neurons. In cultured CG neurons, activin can stimulate the expression of somatostatin in choroid neurons, the pattern of neurotransmitter expression found in vivo, and in the ciliary neurons that would normally not express somatostatin. In vivo, mRNA transcripts of the cActR-IIA appear to be expressed by both choroid and ciliary CG neurons. This suggests that activin might serve as an instructive factor in controlling neuropeptide phenotype. For activin to serve as an instructive factor requires that activin be produced by choroid smooth-muscle target cells. Indeed, activin mRNA and activin-like immunoreactivity are found in choroid cells, in vitro. However, the lack of somatostatin expression by ciliary neurons suggests that activin is not produced by their targets, the iris and ciliary body. This simple view is countered by the observation that activin A mRNA is also present in the iris and activin-like immunoreactivity is detectable in the iris and ciliary body. Instead, the production of the specific activin inhibitor follistatin in the iris and ciliary body is likely to limit the availability of activin to only those neurites innervating the choroid layer, thus accounting for the differential expression of somatostatin in only the choroid CG neurons. This somewhat more complicated arrangement is similar to the mechanism thought to be employed for primary induction during frog embryogenesis. The observations reviewed here are all consistent with the hypothesized role for activin as a molecule whose availability to neurites in the target regulates neurotransmitter expression. Additional in vivo perturbation experiments are needed to further examine this hypothesis; nevertheless, activin appears as a strong candidate for a target-derived neurotransmitter differentiation factor. Activin's potential roles in differentiation: A wide variety of biological effects have been ascribed to activin. Initially identified and purified as a gonadal hormone stimulating the production and release of FSH from the pituitary, activin is also implicated in the stimulation of erythroid differentiation, as a modulator of follicular granulosa cell differentiation, as a mesodermalizing factor in both amphibian and avian early development, and as a component in establishing left-right axial patterning in the chicken embryo. Activin has also been found to be a survival factor for several neuronal cell lines and for rat embryonic neural retina cells in culture. However, activin is not a survival factor for chicken CG neurons in culture. Our observation that activin may play a function in target-derived control of neuropeptide expression adds yet another aspect to the list of its potential biological functions. In addition, activin shares regions of amino acid sequence identity with members of the TGF-beta superfamily, which includes the TGF-betas, Mullerian inhibitory substance, Drosophila decapentaplegic gene product, dorsalin, bone morphogenetic proteins, inhibin, and glial-derived neurotrophic factor. Interestingly, these are all factors that have effects upon cellular differentiation. Effects of activin on other neurons. Activin A--as well as two other TGF-beta superfamily members, BMP-2 and BMP-6--has been shown to induce expression of mRNAs for several neuropeptides in cultured rat sympathetic neurons. In addition, activin A induces ChAT mRNA in cultured sympathetic neurons. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Characterization of developmental stage and neuronal potential of the rat PNS-derived stem cell line, RT4-AC

RT4 is a family of cell lines derived from a rat peripheral neurotumor and consists of a multipotential stem cell line that spontaneously gives rise to three derivative cell types: one glial-like and two neuronal-like. Previous studies have established that the RT4 glial derivative expresses many properties of Schwann cells; however, the neuronal designation of the other RT4 derivatives is less well substantiated. To further characterize the developmental stage and lineages represented by the RT4 stem cell and its derivatives we examined the expression of 16 marker genes whose expression is either specific to neurons or in some cases, neural tissue. Taken together our results indicate that (i) the RT4 neuronal-like derivatives express only immature neuronal properties, (ii) the RT4 cell lines most closely resemble neural crest derivatives from embryonic day 10 to 12 in the rat, (iii) treatment with cAMP and steroids, although capable of promoting process extension by the RT4 neuronal-like derivatives, did not affect the expression of any of the 16 marker genes examined, and (iv) when compared to other neural stem cell systems, RT4-AC generates the most immature neuronal derivatives.

Activin A and follistatin expression in developing targets of ciliary ganglion neurons suggests a role in regulating neurotransmitter phenotype

The avian ciliary ganglion contains choroid neurons that innervate choroid vasculature and express somatostatin as well as ciliary neurons that innervate iris/ciliary body but do not express somatostatin. We have previously shown in culture that activin A induces somatostatin immunoreactivity in both neuron populations. We now show in vivo that both targets contain activin A; however, choroid expressed higher levels of activin A mRNA. In contrast, follistatin, an activin A inhibitor, was higher in iris/ciliary body. Iris cell-conditioned medium also contained an activity that inhibited activin A and could be depleted with anti-follistatin antibodies. These results suggest that development of somatostatin is limited to choroid neurons by differential expression of activin A and follistatin in ciliary ganglion targets.

Differential development of cholinergic neurons from cranial and trunk neural crest cells in vitro

Several studies have suggested that the development of cholinergic properties in cranial parasympathetic neurons is determined by these cells' axial level of origin in the neural crest. All cranial parasympathetic neurons normally derive from cranial neural crest. Trunk neural crest cells give rise to sympathetic neurons, most of which are noradrenergic. To determine if there is an intrinsic difference in the ability of cranial and trunk neural crest cells to form cholinergic neurons, we have compared the development of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-immunoreactive cells in explants of quail cranial and trunk neural crest in vitro. Both cranial and trunk neural crest explants gave rise to ChAT-immunoreactive cells in vitro. In both types of cultures, some of the ChAT-positive cells also expressed immunoreactivity for the catecholamine synthetic enzyme tyrosine hydroxylase. However, several differences were seen between cranial and trunk cultures. First, ChAT-immunoreactive cells appeared two days earlier in cranial than in trunk cultures. Second, cranial cultures contained a higher proportion of ChAT-immunoreactive cells. Finally, a subpopulation of the ChAT-immunoreactive cells in cranial cultures exhibited neuronal traits, including neurofilament immunoreactivity. In contrast, neurofilament-immunoreactive cells were not seen in trunk cultures. These results suggest that premigratory cranial and trunk neural crest cells differ in their ability to form cholinergic neurons.