Expression of neuronal intermediate filament proteins ON1 and ON2 during goldfish optic nerve regeneration: effect of tectal ablation

Evidence that regenerating optic axons maintain long-term growth in the lizard Ctenophorus ornatus: growth-associated protein-43 and gefiltin expression

In the lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus, the optic nerve regenerates but animals remain blind via the experimental eye, presumably as a result of axons failing to consolidate a retinotopic map in the optic tectum. Here we have examined immunohistochemically the expression of the growth-associated protein GAP-43 and the low-molecular-weight intermediate filament protein gefiltin, up to one year after optic nerve crush. Both proteins were found to be permanently up-regulated, suggesting that regenerating axons are held in a permanent state of re-growth. We speculate that, in the lizard, the continued expression of GAP-43 and the failure to switch from the expression of low- to high-molecular-weight intermediate filament proteins are associated with the inability to consolidate a retinotopic projection.

A vulnerable period of colchicine toxicity during goldfish optic nerve regeneration

The effects of intraocular (i.o.) administration of the alkaloid colchicine on visual recovery following axotomy of the goldfish optic nerve were investigated. Under the experimental conditions used, control goldfish recovered vision, measured behaviorally, within 5-7 weeks of retro-orbital optic nerve crush. Fish injected i. o. with 0.1 microg of colchicine within 3 days of optic nerve crush (post-crush; PC) recovered vision after some delay relative to control fish, while injection with colchicine between 7 and 14 days PC produced a much more profound inhibition of recovery of vision, in most cases a complete block for the duration of the study (98 days). Further evidence for a delayed susceptibility of the regenerating optic nerve to colchicine following crush was reflected in a suppression of neurite outgrowth normally seen in explanted retinal tissue taken from PC goldfish. In addition, retrograde transport of the fluorescent dye 4-(4-didecylaminostyryl)-N-methylpyridinium iodide from the optic tectum to the retina as a measure of axonal continuity revealed substantially less labeling following i.o. administration of colchicine 1 week PC when compared to retinas from fish receiving colchicine at the time of optic nerve crush. Histological sections of the retina showed no evidence of residual retinal damage resulting from the colchicine injections or from interactions of axotomy and the drug administration. These results indicate a period of increased vulnerability of the regenerating visual system to the toxic effects of i.o. administered colchicine, beginning 3-5 days PC, and remaining until regenerating optic nerve fibers have begun to reach the tectum. While colchicine has many known effects on nerve function, it is proposed that the delayed susceptibility to disruption of regeneration observed in these experiments is largely, if not entirely, attributable to a colchicine-induced accumulation of tubulin heterodimers, which are known to block microtubule assembly and to participate in a feedback inhibition of tubulin synthesis. Thus, it is during the maximal induction of tubulin synthesis and of microtubule formation which normally occurs several days following axotomy that colchicine has its greatest effect. The results suggest that colchicine may be especially neurotoxic during neural development and regeneration.

The levels of retinal mRNA for gefiltin, a neuronal intermediate filament protein, are regulated by the tectum during optic fiber regeneration in the goldfish

Reorganization of the intermediate filament (IF) network during axonal regeneration is accompanied by changes in the expression of various IF proteins. An increase in expression of the neuronal IF subunit gefiltin in goldfish retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) has been linked to the unique ability of the goldfish optic nerve to regenerate following injury. Evidence suggests that the optic tectum, the target of optic fibers, may regulate the expression of gefiltin during regeneration. To address this issue we examined gefiltin mRNA levels during optic fiber regeneration in the presence or absence of the tectum. We found that gefiltin mRNA levels in the RGCs of animals that received an optic nerve crush (ONC group) began increasing by 10 days, peaked from 20 to 38 days at 5.5-fold over normal, and declined to near normal values by 115 days. In animals that had the entire tectum removed as well as an optic nerve crush (ETR group), gefiltin mRNA levels increased by 10 days, peaked at 20 days at 5.5 to 6.5-fold over normal, and although they dropped slightly thereafter, they remained elevated at 5-fold over normal for at least 115 days. When axons regenerated to the ipsilateral tectal lobe as a result of a left tectal lobe removal and left eye removal surgery (LTR/LER group), the expression pattern of gefiltin mRNA paralleled that of the ONC group. We also found that the abundance of gefiltin subunits in the retina was elevated at 30 days of regeneration in ONC and ETR animals, and that levels in the nerve were reconstituted to 80% of normal by 30 days. These results demonstrate that increases in gefiltin mRNA and protein levels during optic nerve regeneration are independent of the tectum, whereas the downregulation of gefiltin mRNA levels in the late stages of regeneration is entirely dependent upon the tectum.

The return of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated epitopes of neurofilament proteins to the regenerating optic nerve of Xenopus laevis

Neurofilament proteins of mammalian axotomized peripheral axons, which regenerate effectively, resemble those of embryonic axons. However, injured centrally projecting mammalian axons, which fail to regenerate, have very different neurofilament compositions than during development. If changes in neurofilament composition after injury reflect the ability of axotomized neurons to regenerate effectively, then the neurofilaments of centrally projecting axons that can regenerate should more closely resemble those of developing axons. In this study, the neurofilament compositions of injured optic axons of the frog, Xenopus laevis, were examined, since these axons can regenerate a fully functional projection. Antibodies to phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of neurofilament proteins that had been used previously to study the neurofilament composition of newly developing X. laevis optic axons were used in immunocytochemical studies to examine the return of neurofilaments to the optic nerve after an intraorbital nerve crush. Intraocularly injected wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase was used to label the regenerating axons independently of their neurofilaments. Neurofilament immunoreactivities disappeared rapidly from crushed axons during the first week after surgery. By nine days after surgery, antibodies to nonphosphorylated forms of middle (NF-M) and low molecular weight (NF-L) neurofilament proteins and the Xenopus neuronal intermediate filament protein (XNIF) began to stain the nerve just beyond the lesion. By this time, however, growing axonal terminals had reached the optic chiasm. Antibodies to phosphorylated epitopes of NF-M began to stain axons at 15 days, just as growing axons began to arrive at the optic tectum. Nonphosphorylated high molecular weight neurofilament protein (NF-H) began to appear in axons between 18 and 21 days after surgery. Thus, the reappearance of neurofilaments during optic axon regeneration resembled the general pattern seen during development. The chief difference between development and regeneration was that neurofilament epitopes took longer to emerge during regeneration. One possibility is that cues encountered along the optic pathway influence the neurofilament composition of retinal ganglion cell axons. Then, the greater distances travelled by regenerating axons could account for the longer time taken for their neurofilament compositions to mature.