Radiotherapy of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a six year experience with 104 patients

MR-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of primary tumor for pain control in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): an open randomized, multicentric, parallel group clinical trial (MASPAC)

Background

Pain symptoms in the upper abdomen and back are prevalent in 80% of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), where the current standard treatment is a systemic therapy consisting of at least doublet-chemotherapy for fit patients. Palliative low-dose radiotherapy is a well-established local treatment option but there is some evidence for a better and longer pain response after a dose-intensified radiotherapy of the primary pancreatic cancer (pPCa). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can deliver high radiation doses in few fractions, therefore reducing chemotherapy-free intervals. However, prospective data on pain control after SBRT of pPCa is very limited. Therefore, we aim to investigate the impact of SBRT on pain control in patients with mPDAC in a prospective trial.

Methods

This is a prospective, double-arm, randomized controlled, international multicenter study testing the added benefit of MR-guided adaptive SBRT of the pPca embedded between standard of care-chemotherapy (SoC-CT) cycles for pain control and prevention of pain in patients with mPDAC. 92 patients with histologically proven mPDAC and at least stable disease after initial 8 weeks of SoC-CT will be eligible for the trial and 1:1 randomized in 3 centers in Germany and Switzerland to either experimental arm A, receiving MR-guided SBRT of the pPCa with 5 × 6.6 Gy at 80% isodose with continuation of SoC-CT thereafter, or control arm B, continuing SoC-CT without SBRT. Daily MR-guided plan adaptation intents to achieve good target coverage, while simultaneously minimizing dose to organs at risk. Patients will be followed up for minimum 6 and maximum of 18 months. The primary endpoint of the study is the “mean cumulative pain index” rated every 4 weeks until death or end of study using numeric rating scale.

Discussion

An adequate long-term control of pain symptoms in patients with mPDAC is an unmet clinical need. Despite improvements in systemic treatment, local complications due to pPCa remain a clinical challenge. We hypothesize that patients with mPDAC will benefit from a local treatment of the pPCa by MR-guided SBRT in terms of a durable pain control with a simultaneously favorable safe toxicity profile translating into an improvement of quality-of-life.

Trial registration

German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRKS): DRKS00025801. Meanwhile the study is also registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the Identifier: NCT05114213.

Radiation Therapy Combined with Chemotherapy for Inoperable Pancreatic Carcinoma

From March 1985 to July 1989, 22 patients with unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma entered the study to receive external beam irradiation with chemotherapy. Radiation therapy consisted of 60 Gy in 3 courses (20 Gy each course) delivered over a period of 2 weeks, with a 2-week rest between the courses. Chemotherapy consisted of 5 fluorouracil, 500 mg/m2, plus cisplatinum, 20 mg/m2, administered on days 1,2 and 3 of each radiation therapy course. Of the 22 evaluable patients, 10 were males and 12 females; their median age was 63 years (range, 32-77), and their median performance status was 80 (range, 60-90). After treatment, 12 partial remissions and 6 no changes were reported. In 4 cases, abdominal progression of disease during treatment required interruption of the therapy program. At the start of treatment, abdominal pain was the most important symptom in 17 patients; improvement of abdominal pain was observed in 10 cases (76%) after treatment and lasted for a median of 5 months. Median survival time was 7.5 months, and time to progression was 6.2 months. Median follow-up was 7 months (range, 14 days -38). In 2 cases, persistent hematologic toxicity did not permit completion of therapy, and in another 3 cases grade II hematologic toxicity required a 2-week rest period over the normal split-course program. In another 4 cases, grade I hematologic toxicity did not require any delay in the therapy program. Our results are comparable with those achieved in other major studies and are acceptable in terms of survival time, palliation of symptoms and toxicity. In our experience, the combination of radiotherapy plus 5-fluoro-uracil and cisplatinum does not seem to offer any advantage over the combination of radiation therapy and 5-fluorouracil.

Long-term results of intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy for nonmetastatic locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Retrospective cohort study, 7-year experience with 247 patients at the National Cancer Center in China

To assess prognostic benefits of intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and evaluate optimal adjuvant treatment after IOERT.A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data was conducted at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, China National Cancer Center.Two hundred forty-seven consecutive patients with nonmetastatic LAPC who underwent IOERT between January 2008 and May 2015 were identified and included in the study. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the day of IOERT. Prognostic factors were examined using Cox proportional hazards models. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 40%, 14%, and 7.2%, respectively, with a median OS of 9.0 months. On multivariate analysis, an IOERT applicator diameter < 6 cm (hazards ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.97), no intraoperative interstitial sustained-release 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.66), and receipt of postoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.04-0.25) were significantly associated with improved OS. Pain relief after IOERT was achieved in 111 of the 117 patients, with complete remission in 74 and partial remission in 37. Postoperative complications rate and mortality were 14.0% and 0.4%, respectively. Nonmetastatic LAPC patients with smaller size tumors could achieve positive long-term survival outcomes with a treatment strategy incorporating IOERT and postoperative adjuvant treatment.Chemoradiotherapy followed by chemotherapy might be a recommended adjuvant treatment strategy for well-selected cases. Intraoperative interstitial sustained-release 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy should not be recommended for patients with nonmetastatic LAPC.

Intraoperative radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 144 patients

PURPOSE

To retrospectively analyze the results of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of 144 patients treated with IORT, with or without, EBRT were reviewed. One hundred and thirteen patients (78.5%) were treated with IORT + EBRT and 114 patients (79.2%) were treated in conjunction with chemotherapy. The median doses of IORT and EBRT were 25 Gy and 45 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up of all 144 patients was 9.6 months (range, 0.5-69.7 months).

RESULTS

At the time of this analysis, 131 of 144 patients (91.0%) had disease recurrences. Local progression was observed in 60 patients (41.7%), and the 2-year local control (LC) rate in all patients was 44.6%. Patients treated with IORT, with or without, EBRT had significantly more favorable LC (2-year LC, 50.9%) than those treated with IORT without EBRT (p = 0.0004). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate and the median survival time in all 144 patients were 14.7% and 10.5 months, respectively. Patients treated with chemotherapy had a significantly favorable OS than those treated without chemotherapy (p < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, chemotherapy use alone had a significant impact on OS and on multivariate analysis; chemotherapy use was a significant prognostic factor. Late gastrointestinal morbidity of National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria Grade 3 was observed in 2 patients (1.4%).

CONCLUSION

IORT + EBRT yields a relatively favorable LC rate for unresectable pancreatic cancer with low frequency of severe late toxicity, and IORT combined with chemotherapy conferred a survival benefit compared with IORT without chemotherapy.

Should patients with locally advanced, non-metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas be irradiated?

A small number of patients exist with carcinoma of the pancreas with an inoperable but not metastasized tumor. Prospective randomized studies defined the standard of combined radiochemotherapy during the early 1980s for these patients. Since then, new drugs have shown considerable activity and in parallel improvements in radiotherapy treatment planning and delivery have been achieved. Therefore, it is time to ask whether patients with locally advanced, inoperable pancreatic cancer without metastases should still be irradiated or not. This review summarizes the current literature on combined radiochemotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the pancreas. Median survival times of 10-11 months and 1-year survival rates of about 40% can be achieved with modern radiochemotherapy regimens.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin for pancreatic cancer: from the laboratory to the clinic

PURPOSE

We have reported that gemcitabine and concurrent radiation is a promising therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. We investigated whether the addition of cisplatin, which may increase the systemic efficacy of gemcitabine, would be synergistic with gemcitabine and/or radiation in human pancreatic cancer cell lines.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

BxPc3 and Panc-1 human pancreatic cancer cells were treated with three different schedules before radiation: (A) a sequential incubation of gemcitabine for 2 h followed by cisplatin for 2 h, (B) gemcitabine for 2 h, followed by washout of drug, replenishment of media for a 24-h incubation, followed by cisplatin for 2 h, and (C) gemcitabine for 24 h with a concurrent incubation of cisplatin for the last 2 h. Cells were assessed for clonogenic survival using a standard assay. Synergism was evaluated by the median effect analysis.

RESULTS

The schedule shown to be maximally synergistic for both cell lines was the consecutive 2-h gemcitabine, 2-h cisplatin exposure, particularly at surviving fractions of <0.5. Cisplatin did not produce radiosensitization nor did it affect gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization.

CONCLUSION

Cisplatin produces synergistic cytotoxicity with gemcitabine without compromising gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization. On the basis of these laboratory and previous clinical observations, we have initiated a Phase I trial of cisplatin plus gemcitabine and radiotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Radiation therapy and concurrent fixed dose amifostine with escalating doses of twice-weekly gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of twice-weekly gemcitabine (TW-G) when administered in conjunction with fixed dose amifostine (A) during external radiotherapy (RT) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, or asymptomatic-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. RT was delivered by using the standard four-field technique (1.8 Gy daily fractions, 45 Gy followed by a boost of 5.4 Gy, in 5-1/2 weeks). The starting dose of TW-G was 60 mg/m(2) (i.v., 30-min infusion), which is equal to the upper limit of previously reported MTD of TW-G when given without A during RT. A was given just before the TW-G, at a fixed dose of 340 mg/m(2) (i.v., rapid infusion). TW-G doses were escalated by 30-mg/m(2) increments in successive cohorts of 3 to 6 additional patients until DLT was observed. Toxicities were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0.

RESULTS

In general, therapy was well tolerated in patients treated at the first two dose levels of 60 mg/m(2) and 90 mg/m(2). The DLT of TW-G given in conjunction with A during RT were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea/vomiting at the dose level of 120 mg/m(2). Of the 10 patients eligible for a median follow-up of 10 months, 5 remain alive; 1 complete responder, 3 partial responders, and 1 with stable disease.

CONCLUSION

A dose of TW-G at a level of 90 mg/m(2) produced tolerable toxicity and it may possess significant activity when delivered in conjunction with 340 mg/m(2) dose of A during RT of the upper abdomen. Due to the higher MTD of TW-G seen in our study, we consider that the A supplementation may optimize the therapeutic index of TW-G-based chemoradiotherapy protocols in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

A prospective study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain

BACKGROUND

Celiac plexus neurolysis, a chemical splanchnicectomy of the celiac plexus, is used to treat pain caused by pancreatic cancer. Most commonly, celiac plexus neurolysis is performed percutaneously under CT or fluoroscopic guidance, but can also be performed with EUS. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy of EUS celiac plexus neurolysis in the management of pain caused by pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In this prospective study conducted in a community-based referral hospital, 58 patients with painful and inoperable pancreatic cancer were evaluated at 8 observation points before and after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis for up to 6 months. The following data were collected: age, gender, tumor location, vascular invasion, adjuvant therapy, and laboratory tests including prothrombin time, and complete blood counts were obtained at baseline (before EUS celiac plexus neurolysis); pain scores, morphine use, and adjuvant therapy were assessed at each observation.

RESULTS

Pain scores were lower (p = 0.0001) 2 weeks after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis, an effect that was sustained for 24 weeks when adjusted for morphine use and adjuvant therapy. Forty-five of the 58 patients (78%) experienced a decline in pain scores after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis. Chemotherapy with and without radiation also decreased pain after EUS celiac plexus neurolysis (p = 0.002). Procedure-related transient abdominal pain was noted in 5 patients; there were no major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS celiac plexus neurolysis is safe and controls pain caused by unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Gastrointestinal tract cancer in the elderly

Gastrointestinal cancers are common in the elderly. In the 1990s, modest advances in the early diagnosis, staging, and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers were made. Emphasis has been placed on screening for colorectal cancer; development of new diagnostic and staging modalities, particularly endoscopic ultrasound; and introduction of new treatment regimens, such as chemoradiation programs for esophageal, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers as well as endoscopic mucosal resection of early gastrointestinal cancers. New palliative techniques, such as laser and photodynamic therapy and placement of enteral stents, are being used increasingly in patients who have advanced cancer and are not surgical candidates. In the past, attitudes toward the elderly affected the management of cancer. Age should not be the only parameter considered when addressing the treatment of a gastrointestinal malignancy. Management decisions in the elderly should follow the same principles as those in younger patients. A thorough medical evaluation in the elderly is necessary to evaluate the patient's risk and to optimize surgical, chemotherapeutic, and palliative outcomes.

Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-four patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. Patients received paclitaxel, 50 mg/m(2) by 3 h i.v. (IV) infusion, weekly, on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 and 29. Radiation was administered concurrently to a total dose of 50.4 Gy, in 1.80 Gy fractions, for 28 treatments.

RESULTS

Nausea and vomiting were the most common toxicities, Grade 3 in five patients (12%). Two patients (5%) had Grade 4 hypersensitivity reactions to their first dose of paclitaxel. Of 42 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 26%. The median survival was 8 months, and the 1-year survival was 30%.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent paclitaxel and radiation demonstrate local-regional activity in pancreatic cancer. Future investigations combining paclitaxel with other local-regional and systemic treatments are warranted.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase I trial of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer: a regimen with unexpected early toxicity

PURPOSE

We performed a phase I trial of protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine that could be safely administered. We also sought to identify the toxicities associated with this treatment protocol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer were treated with planned doses of radiation (59.4 Gy) and PVI of 5-FU (200 mg/m(2)/d) with gemcitabine doses of 50 to 100 mg/m(2)/wk.

RESULTS

Two of three patients at the 100-mg/m(2)/wk dose level experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), as did three of four at the 50-mg/m(2)/wk dose level. One patient experienced a mucocutaneous reaction described as a Stevens-Johnson syndrome that was attributed to chemotherapy. Three patients developed gastric or duodenal ulcers with severe bleeding requiring transfusion. One patient developed severe thrombocytopenia lasting longer than 4 weeks. Three of the five episodes of DLT developed at radiation doses < or = 36 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Based on this experience, we cannot recommend further investigation of regimens incorporating gemcitabine into regimens of radiation with PVI 5-FU. The mechanism of this synergistic toxicity remains to be determined.

Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy: effects on pancreatic pain and function

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prospectively the effect of bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy on pancreatic pain and function.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Severe pain is often the dominant symptom in pancreatic disease, despite a wide variety of methods used for symptom relief. Refinement of thoracoscopic technique has led to the introduction of thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy in the treatment of pancreatic pain.

METHODS

Forty-four patients, 23 with pancreatic cancer and 21 with chronic pancreatitis, were included in the study and underwent bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy. Effects on pain (visual analogue scale) and pancreatic function (standard secretin test, basal serum glucose, plasma insulin, and C-peptide) were measured.

RESULTS

Four patients (9%) required thoracotomy because of bleeding. There were no procedure-related deaths. The mean duration of follow-up was 3 months for cancer and 43 months for pancreatitis. Pain relief was evident in the first postoperative week and was sustained during follow-up, the average pain score being reduced by 50%. All patients showed a decrease in consumption of analgesics. Neither endocrine nor exocrine function was adversely affected by the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy is beneficial in the treatment of pancreatic pain and is not associated with deterioration of pancreatic function.

Complete remission of nonresectable pancreatic cancer after infusional colloidal phosphorus-32 brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and 5-fluorouracil: a preliminary report

This is a preliminary report of five patients diagnosed with locally advanced nonresectable pancreatic cancer who achieved improved quality of life, delay of local progression, and reduction of biomarker CA 19-9 after infusion of colloidal phosphorus 32 (32P) and administration of combined chemoradiotherapy. A phase II trial using intratumoral colloidal 32P delivery for nonresectable pancreatic cancer without metastases is in progress. Patients initially were given infusions of decadron followed by macroaggregated albumin and 30 mCi colloidal 32P to the interstitial space of the tumor by two infusions 1 week apart. Through this method, doses ranging from 750,000 to 1,800,000 cGy were delivered. After administration of colloidal 32P, external radiation to a dose of 6000 cGy minimum tumor dose, including regional lymph nodes, was given concomitantly with four intravenous infusions of 500 mg bolus 5-fluorouracil on alternating days within the first 2 weeks after initiation of external radiation. All five of these patients demonstrated cessation of local tumor growth or regression of disease on serial computed tomography scans for a minimum of 10 months from completion of therapy. Three of these patients have survived without local disease progression over 24 months from initiation of therapy, with one patient approaching 36 months. CA 19-9 values for all patients declined within weeks after completion of therapy. This new method of isotope delivery has resulted in reduction of tumor volume, normalization of the biomarker CA 19-9, and improved performance status in those patients who have localized nonresectable disease without dissemination.

Review article: current treatment and optimal patient management in pancreatic cancer

This review analyses the current state of knowledge and understanding concerning the optimum treatment and therapeutic management of patients who suffer from pancreatic cancer. It outlines recent advances in scientific understanding and assesses their potential future value to clinicians in confronting this disease. Despite a significant expansion in scientific knowledge relating to factors underlying the early development of pancreatic carcinoma, the clinician continues to be restricted to a severely limited therapeutic armoury for this disease. Local therapies (surgery and radiation) are inevitably of limited value in the face of a disease that is normally encountered at a stage where metastasis is already highly developed. Despite such limitations, however, surgery performed in specialist units may be of value for 10-20% of patients, with a 5-year survival rate in such units of between 10 and 24%. This may be improved even further by appropriate use of adjuvant treatment. The advanced stage of the disease when normally encountered emphasizes the potential value of systemic treatment in this therapeutic area. Unfortunately systemic treatment (chemotherapy) has been found to be ineffective to date in significantly extending survival, with a low rate and duration of remission being identified in most trials. The challenge for both the health service and the pharmaceutical industry is to harness recent and future developments in scientific knowledge to the practical benefit of clinicians. Where cure is possible it should be vigorously pursued; where it is not, in this field above all others, clinicians have a duty of care. To achieve this it is necessary to abandon the therapeutic nihilism that has characterized the attitudes of clinicians towards this disease in the past. It is time that such nihilism was replaced by a recognition of the challenges and the opportunities available to clinicians in enhancing the quantity and quality of life available to patients. The dictum of 'curing whenever possible but caring always' should be the future therapeutic philosophy used to guide clinicians in this important and rapidly changing therapeutic area.

[Locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: current therapeutic modalities]

Pancreatic cancer still have bad prognosis. At the time of diagnosis, less than 10% of patients can undergo surgery with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 2%. For patients with localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy has been shown to control symptoms and to enhance patient survival. This treatment should be proposed to all the patients with good performance status and without icterus. Pain management should be optimized and often need morphinic and co-antalgic (anticonvulsivants, steroids) consumption. The celiac plexus block with alcohol gives an excellent pain relief and should be more frequently used.

Preclinical studies of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for pancreatic carcinoma

The use of radiation therapy combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of pancreatic cancer has been well established. It has been hypothesized that any benefit from combined 5-FU and radiation has been due to radiosensitization. Improved therapy could result from a better understanding of the mechanism of radiosensitization and the development of compounds capable of providing better radiosensitization. This article reviews preclinical findings on the mechanism of cytotoxicity and radiosensitization for 5-FU, fluorodeoxyuridine, thymidine analogs, and gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) and discusses the clinical implications of these findings.

Systemic and adjuvant therapy for patients with pancreatic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal disease with < or = 5% of patients surviving 5 years. There is no curative therapy for patients who cannot be surgically resected. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy can provide palliation but have not had a significant impact on 5-year survival.

METHODS

Newer approaches for improving the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer integrating chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery are being evaluated. New chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., gemcitabine, camptothecins, taxanes, thymydilate synthase inhibitors, and fluorouracil-related compounds) are being studied alone and in combination with each other or different agents (e.g., trimetrexate or platinum-related compounds).

RESULTS

Increased knowledge about the biology of pancreatic cancer (including high frequency of ras and p53 mutations in neoplastic cells or the expression of a number of growth factor receptors on the cell surface) has lead to preclinical evaluation of novel approaches attempting to specifically target these. These novel approaches include gene therapy, vaccines, and antisense oligonucleotides targeted to genes important for proliferation or survival of pancreatic cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Continued development of new approaches is needed to improve the treatment and survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Role of Radiation Therapy and Fluoropyrimidines in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Malignancies

BACKGROUND: The use of combined chemotherapy and radiation for gastrointestinal malignancies has several theoretical advantages, and clinical trials to determine the type and extent of clinical benefits have been performed. METHODS: The basic science and clinical trial data evaluating such combinations are reviewed, with an emphasis on the interactions between fluoropyrimidines and radiation. RESULTS: Improved outcomes from chemoradiotherapy have been demonstrated in patients with selected stages of anal, esophageal, rectal, and pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Despite these positive results, further work is needed to demonstrate even more effective and less toxic treatment regimens.

Feasibility study of the treatment of primary unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas with 103Pd brachytherapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of 103Pd brachytherapy in the management of primary unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between August 1988 and January 1992, 11 patients with biopsy-proven primary unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with 103Pd brachytherapy during laparotomy. The median age was 66 (range 57-70). The most common presenting symptoms were weight loss (eight patients), pain (six patients), and nausea/vomiting (four patients). Less common symptoms were jaundice (two patients), early satiety (two patients), and ascites (one patient). All patients underwent laparotomy and surgical staging. Eight patients had T3N0M0 disease, two patients had T3N1M0 disease, and one patient had T3N1M1 disease. The surgical procedure performed was biliary bypass in six patients, biopsy only in four patients, and gastric bypass in one patient. The average tumor dimension was 4.0 cm. The median activity, matched peripheral dose (MPD) and implanted volumes were 95.3 mCi, 124.4 Gy, and 33 cm3, respectively. The median initial dose rate was 0.21 Gy per hour. Five patients received postoperative external beam radiation therapy (median 45 Gy) and seven patients received chemotherapy postoperatively. The median follow-up was 7 months (range 1-19).

RESULTS

The median survival for the entire group of patients was 6.9 months. Ten of 11 patients have died, with 1 patient presently alive and receiving chemotherapy for metastatic disease to the liver, but without local progression radiographically. Five of 11 patients (45%) were locally controlled, defined as either a complete response or freedom from progression at the site of the implant as evaluated by computed tomography scan. In the other six patients, the median time to local progression was 6.9 months. Five patients developed distant metastases (four liver, one subcutaneous nodule). Two patients failed in regional sites (one omentum, one paraaortic lymph node). Four of 11 patients (36%) developed acute postoperative complications that included one gastric outlet obstruction, one duodenal perforation, and two with sepsis. One of 11 patients (9%) developed a late complication of radiation enteritis 5 months after implantation. The median survival for patients experiencing complications was 1.7 months as compared to 8.4 months for the patients who did not develop a complication (p = 0.10). Pain relief was obtained in five out of six (83%) of the patients presenting with pain for a median duration of 24 weeks. Local control did not appear to be related to the MPD, dose rate, implanted volume, treatment with external beam irradiation, or the use of chemotherapy. Patients were more likely to develop a complication if the MPD was greater than 115 Gy (four out of six patients) as compared to those whose MPD was less than 115 Gy (one out of five patients) (p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Because there was no improvement in median survival over conventional modalities, and the complication rate was high; we do not recommend 103Pd brachytherapy as a component of the treatment of unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

A phase I study of combined radiation therapy with 5-fluorouracil and low dose folinic acid in patients with locally advanced pancreatic or biliary carcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the toxicities of a Phase I study of radiation therapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and low dose folinic acid in patients with locally advanced pancreatic or biliary carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-seven patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the pancreas (n = 19), bile duct (n = 7), and gall bladder (n = 1) were entered into a Phase I study of combined radiation therapy, 5FU, and folinic acid. Radiation was given as a split course of 40 Gy in 20 daily fractions with a gap of 2 weeks after 20 Gy. 5-Fluorouracil, 300 to 375 mg/m2/day and folinic acid, 20 mg/m2/day were given as an i.v. bolus daily for 5 days beginning on day 1 and again on day 29.

RESULTS

Eight patients developed Grade 3 or 4 toxicities (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) including nausea and vomiting (n = 4), oral mucositis (n = 4), myelosuppression (n = 2), infection (n = 2), and diarrhea (n = 1). Four patients did not complete the planned protocol due to treatment toxicities. There were two treatment deaths secondary to septic neutropenia. Treatment toxicity appeared to be related to age (> 70), performance status (ECOG = 2), and 5FU dose (> 350 mg/m2/day).

CONCLUSION

This protocol is poorly tolerated by elderly patients or those with poor performance status, and 350 mg/m2/day is our recommended dose for 5FU as given in this protocol.

Surgical palliation of unresectable pancreatic carcinoma

The decision to perform surgical versus nonoperative palliation for unresectable pancreatic cancer is influenced by a number of factors. In most cases, patient symptoms clearly dictate the management. In patients with symptoms of duodenal obstruction at the time of presentation, surgery is the only option. In patients with obstructive jaundice alone, the options for management must be weighed against factors such as overall health status, projected survival, and procedure-related morbidity and mortality. A prospective multicenter trial recently analyzed factors influencing perioperative morbidity and mortality following both curative and palliative surgery for pancreatic cancer. This analysis demonstrated that preoperative diabetes, low Kanofsky's index, and liver metastases are significant risk factors in predicting perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing palliative procedures for pancreatic cancer. Another analysis focusing on tumor characteristics suggested that for patients with Stage I and Stage II disease (i.e., with no evidence of systemic metastases), survival and the potential for late duodenal obstruction favor surgical management. In summary, although patient management must be individualized, most patients with pancreatic cancer in good medical health and with no evidence of systemic disease are most appropriately managed with surgical palliation. This option affords patients the best chance of avoiding the late complications of recurrent jaundice, duodenal obstruction, and disabling pain. Surgical palliation can generally be completed with an acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality and a hospital stay of approximately 2 weeks. Finally, only surgical exploration can offer full opportunity for resection for cure.

Current management of pancreatic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The author seeks to provide an update on the current management of pancreatic carcinoma, including diagnosis and staging, surgical resection and adjuvant therapy for curative intent, and palliation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

During the 1960s and 1970s, the operative mortality and long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic carcinoma was so poor that some authors advocated abandoning the procedure. Several recent series have reported a marked improvement in perioperative results with 5-year survival in excess of 20%. Significant advances also have been made in areas of preoperative evaluation and palliation for advanced disease.

CONCLUSION

Although carcinoma of the pancreas remains a disease with a poor prognosis, advances in the last decade have led to improvements in the overall management of this disease. Resection for curative intent currently should be accomplished with minimal perioperative mortality. Surgical palliation also may provide the optimal management of selected patients.

Management of pancreatic carcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is the fifth-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. It is estimated that 27,000 patients die each year with this diagnosis. The overall five-year survival of patients with pancreatic cancer remains less than 5%, but some subsets of patients may have a better prognosis. Advanced imaging and laparoscopy have improved staging to better select patients for potentially curative surgery, while the operative morbidity and mortality of the Whipple resection have decreased in recent years. Non-surgical therapies in current use include chemotherapy, external-beam radiation therapy, and brachytherapy, as well as pain management. More recently, gene insertion therapy has shown promise in animal models. This review discusses current diagnostic and treatment strategies for these patients and documents the need for new strategies in the future.

Evaluating the role of photodynamic therapy in the management of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cancer of the pancreas constitutes one of the major causes of cancer related death throughout the world. A 5-year survival rate of only 2% and a maximum of 20 months median survival in multi modality treatment studies dealing with the most favorable patients only, has been demonstrated. This review analyzes the principal treatments and available experimental data in view of a clinical application of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

On the basis of published results, we examined the palliation of pancreatic cancer by chemotherapy alone; radiation alone and multimodality schedules (radiation and chemotherapy). Radical tumor resection was examined as attempted curative treatment.

RESULTS

In reported therapeutic procedures, palliative or potentially curative, median survival was below 2 years. The GTSG reported survival time increases from 10.9 to 21.0 months when surgery is followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. This combination postoperatively does not increase mortality, but adds 30% morbidity. Photodynamic therapy has been demonstrated in preclinical studies to have a selective effect on malignant versus the normal pancreas.

CONCLUSION

PDT is highly effective in eliciting the destruction of experimental pancreatic tumors with the lack of significant effect on the normal pancreas. The poor prognosis for patients with this disease, especially those patients with advanced disease, warrants closer examination of PDT for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Circadian rhythm modulated 5-FUdR infusion with Megace in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer

Thirteen patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma were treated with circadian rhythm modulated infusion of 5-FUdR and Megace. Treatment was initiated at a dose of 0.15 mg/kg/day for 14 days every 28 days and was increased or decreased by 0.025 mg/kg/day with each subsequent cycle until maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved. Megace (200 mg) was administered daily in divided doses. One-third of the patients were able to complete > or = 6 cycles of treatment, one-half could only complete < or = 2 cycles, and the remainder managed 3-4 cycles. No patients had regression of disease, but a small number, who were able to receive 6-7 months of treatment, achieved stable disease in the short term. In conclusion, treatment was fairly well tolerated. However, increased dose intensity by this method did not significantly increase response rate. In only a few patients was disease stabilized for a brief period. Megace did not materially improve nutritional status. CA-19-9 levels did not correlate well with disease activity.

Current status and future directions in the perioperative treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Even after resection with curative intent, the 5-year survival rates usually do not exceed 5%, and neither radiotherapy (RT) nor chemotherapy (CT) improve long term survival. Because of the poor outcome of patients with localized disease, studies should be directed to selected patients who benefit from surgery and from combined treatment of surgery with chemo-irradiation. Future developments in the treatment of locoregionally confined pancreatic cancer will have to focus on treatment modalities which improve the local tumor control as well as the control of occult distant disease. Combined CT/RT seems to be the most promising approach for these patients. However, to date there are more questions than clearcut answers about what such a multimodality treatment should look like. This concerns the selection of patients, the dosages, time schedules, and routes of administration of CT and RT. Last but not least, there is a need for more effective CT in pancreatic cancer. New drugs and multiple drug combinations should be studied in patients who are not candidates for multimodality treatment because of distant metastases. Well designed trials that address these issues are urgently needed in the forthcoming years.

Multimodality treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer is poor (median survival 3-5 months). In view of the localized character of this disease several groups have explored the value of combined modality treatment. The conditions are that a good local treatment and an effective systemic treatment are available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The results of irradiation and of chemotherapy in advanced disease are reviewed.

RESULTS

An overview of combined modality treatment has been given.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of combined modality treatment are superior to irradiation alone or to symptomatic treatment.

Chemical splanchnicectomy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. A prospective randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was completed comparing intraoperative chemical splanchnicectomy with 50% alcohol versus a placebo injection of saline in patients with histologically proven unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Standardized assessment of pain, mood, and disability due to pain was completed preoperatively and at 2-month intervals until death. Chemical splanchnicectomy with alcohol was performed in 65 patients, whereas 72 patients received the placebo. The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex, location, and stage of tumor, operation performed, the use of postoperative chemo- and radiation therapy, and initial assessment scores for pain, mood, and disability.

RESULTS

No differences in hospital mortality or complications, return to oral intake, or length of hospital stay were observed. Mean pain scores were significantly lower in the alcohol group at 2-, 4-, and 6-month follow-up and at the final assessment (p < 0.05). To further determine the effect of chemical splanchnicectomy, patients were stratified into those with and without preoperative pain. In patients without preoperative pain, alcohol significantly reduced pain scores and delayed or prevented the subsequent onset of pain (p < 0.05). In patients with significant preoperative pain, alcohol significantly reduced existing pain (p < 0.05). Furthermore, patients with preexisting pain who received alcohol showed a significant improvement in survival when compared with controls (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that intraoperative chemical splanchnicectomy with alcohol significantly reduces or prevents pain in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Conventional external irradiation alone as adjuvant treatment in resectable pancreatic cancer: results of a prospective study

Between 1/85 and 1/90, 14 consecutive patients were entered into a prospective study of conventional adjuvant post-operative external beam radiotherapy after complete resection for a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The surgical procedure was a Whipple resection in nine patients, a distal pancreatectomy in four patients and a total pancreatectomy in one patient. There were three T1b, eight T2 and three T3 tumours (UICC 1987); nodal involvement was present in five cases. The radiotherapy was delivered using a four-field box technique with a 23 x MV photon beam. All patients received a total dose of 54 Gy to the tumour bed. The mean treated volume was 900 cm3. Acute toxicities consisted mainly of weight loss (mean: 2 kg). Two patients had a grade 2 diarrhoea and two patients a grade 2 gastritis. Late effects were minimal and only observed in two patients. The overall locoregional recurrence (LR) rate was 50%. The median disease-free survival was 12 months, and the median survival was 23 months. This post-operative conventional radiotherapy treatment gives results that are comparable to the results of the GITSG-adjuvant study using a combination of split-course radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

Surgical palliation for pancreatic cancer: developments during the past two decades

Improvements in pancreatic imaging over the past 20 years have revolutionized the preoperative diagnosis and assessment of resectability in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. This review highlights the resultant trends in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, comparing series reported between 1981 and 1990 with those from the previous decade. Small but worthwhile gains have been achieved both in overall resection rate and in the survival rate from such resections. Nevertheless, 80 per cent or more of affected patients are still unsuitable for resection because of the extent of their disease. Laparotomy retains a crucial role in the management of carcinoma of the pancreatic head, although percutaneous and endoscopic stents provide a useful alternative for palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice in elderly patients or those with carcinomatosis. Operation provides the chance to confirm the nature and full extent of the tumour, to circumvent duodenal obstruction and to abolish pain, besides relieving jaundice without the need for tubes (with their potential to block). By contrast, operative treatment generally has much less to offer in patients with carcinoma of the pancreatic body, unless diagnosis and irresectability remain in doubt. In combination, radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil may achieve more as adjuncts to palliative surgery than either agent alone. The increasing safety of pancreaticoduodenectomy raises the possibility of palliative resection in younger patients with limited but incurable disease.

Long-term results of combined modality treatment with I-125 implantation for carcinoma of the pancreas

From 1981 to 1987, 81 patients with localized, unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas were treated at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital with a combination of intraoperative Iodine-125 implantation, external beam radiation, and peri-operative systemic chemotherapy. Fifty patients had Stage II disease and 31 patients had Stage III disease. Radioactive Iodine-125 seeds were implanted intraoperatively into the tumor to deliver a minimum peripheral dose of 12,000 cGy over one year. This was followed by external beam radiation (50-55 Gy) and systemic chemotherapy (5-FU, Mitomycin-C +/- CCNU). Incidence of peri-operative mortality was 5% (4/81). Early morbidity was observed in 34% of patients and late complications in 32%. A median survival of 12 months and 2- and 5-year survival rates of 21% and 7% were observed. The determinate 2- and 5-year survival rates were 28% and 13%, respectively. The overall 2- and 5-year survival rates with Stage II disease were 27% and 8% and for Stage III disease, 13% and 3%, respectively (p less than 0.05). The determinate 2- and 5-year survival rates were 34% and 19% for Stage II and 19% and 5% for Stage III disease, respectively (p = 0.08). Local control of disease was achieved in 71% of patients. This combined modality approach appears to have achieved satisfactory local control of primary cancer and long term survival of selected patients.

Interstitial brachytherapy for pancreatic cancer: report of seven cases treated with 125I and a review of the literature

Since 1975, seven groups of investigators have reported clinical results of interstitial brachytherapy (IBT) for pancreatic cancer. The reports are comprised of data from 254 patients, 21 of whom died in the postoperative period for an overall operative mortality rate of 8.7%. Operative mortality rate range from 0% to 32% in individual reports. Most patients have been treated with 125I, although 25 patients were treated with 198Au seeds. Most investigators report combining IBT with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) +/- adjuvant chemotherapy. In general, IBT has been associated with considerable morbidity. Median patient survival time has not exceeded 15 months. This report describes an additional seven patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer, without distant metastases, treated primarily with 60 to 100 Gy matched peripheral dose (MPD) by 125I IBT. One patient died postoperatively of a pulmonary embolus. Four of the remaining six patients were also treated with modest doses (10.5 to 30 Gy) of EBRT late in the course of the disease for local tumor progression. One developed a pancreaticocutaneous fistula, and one developed exacerbation of pre-existing diabetes mellitus. The median patient survival time from the date of IBT was 7 months (range: 0 to 21 months). One patient is alive without clinical evidence of cancer 9 months after IBT.

Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOEBRT) for carcinoma of the exocrine pancreas

The abdominal cavities of 50 patients were explored in a specially constructed intraoperative radiotherapy operating amphitheater at the Medical College of Ohio. Twenty-six patients were treated with intraoperative and postoperative precision high dose external beam therapy, 12 with intraoperative irradiation but no external beam therapy, and 12 with palliative surgery alone. All but two patients completed the postoperative external beam radiation therapy as initially prescribed. The median survival time for patients treated with palliative surgery alone was 4 months, and that for patients treated with intraoperative radiotherapy without external beam therapy was 3.5 months. Patients undergoing intraoperative irradiation and external beam radiation therapy had a median survival time of 10.5 months. Four patients died within 30 days of surgery and two patients died of gastrointestinal hemorrhage 5 months posttreatment.

Radiotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

In the last two decades, we have witnessed revolutionary advances in pancreatic imaging as well as increased availability of megavoltage radiotherapy equipment and sophisticated radiotherapy planning devices. Several advances in the radiotherapy of pancreatic cancer have been made for the patient with resectable disease. Postoperative radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy confers a survival advantage after 'curative' resection. Preoperative and intraoperative intraoperative radiotherapy may do the same, but this requires further evaluation. Preoperative irradiation may improve the resectability rate, but the clinical data are still very limited. For locally unresectable disease, PHD radiotherapy with adjuvant 5-FU should now be the standard treatment in suitable cases with a median survival time of about one year. High LET radiation beams have failed to produce improved survival in two prospective randomized studies. Intraoperative radiotherapy is an effective means of pain control and enhances control of local disease, but has not been shown to improve survival rate significantly. Interstitial radiotherapy also improves local control, but it is associated with a high mortality rate and an even higher major complication rate. Wide-area radiation therapy and preoperative radiotherapy both seem to show promise in this group of patients. Patients with metastatic disease should be treated palliatively on an individual basis.

Ultrasonically guided percutaneous implantation of iodine-125 seeds in pancreatic carcinoma

Cancer of the pancreas is most often not diagnosed before it has reached unresectable stages. The development of effective palliative treatment for these patients and for those with recurrence after resection is clearly needed. The present study reports the results of ultrasonically guided percutaneous implantation of 125I seeds in 19 patients with cancer of the pancreas. Twelve patients had further adjuvant external radiation. Despite satisfactory seed placement and delivery of the planned radiation dose in most cases, clinical improvement was lacking or only slight and short-lived. No difference in survival or palliation was observed between patients treated with seeds alone compared with patients treated with seeds and external radiation. Survival after seed implantation was short (median 140 days, range 7-401 days). Ultrasonically guided percutaneous implantation of 125I seeds cannot be recommended in the treatment of unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas.

High dose, external beam and intraoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of resectable and unresectable pancreatic cancer

Ninety patients with pancreatic cancer were treated by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with or without surgical resection of the tumor, and the results were compared with those of a historical control comprising 112 patients treated by surgery alone. At an early stage of this study, postoperative EBRT (50-60 Gy) or IORT (25-33 Gy) was given alone, but recently the two modalities have been combined. The combination of high doses of EBRT and IORT was well tolerated provided that the gastrointestinal tract was not irradiated during IORT. Although EBRT plus IORT appeared to yield better results than either EBRT or IORT alone, the difference was not significant on multivariate analysis, and patients receiving EBRT, IORT, or EBRT + IORT were grouped together. Patients receiving radiotherapy in addition to macroscopically curative surgery had a slightly longer median survival time (14 months) than those receiving curative surgery alone (10 months), but the 3-year survival rate was similar (21% vs. 19%). In patients who underwent noncurative resection, the median survival time was significantly longer for the irradiated group (12 months) than for the control group (6.5 months). Also, in patients with unresectable lesions but no distant metastases, irradiation prolonged the median survival time significantly (8 vs. 3.5 months). In this group, there was one 5-year survivor, who received EBRT of 55 Gy plus IORT of 30 Gy to his unresectable pancreatic body lesion. Patients with metastases were also treated for palliation of symptoms, but it was found that irradiation prolonged the median survival time even in such cases (4.5 vs. 2.5 months). Based on these results, we plan to use EBRT plus IORT in all pancreatic cancer patients with no metastases.

The prevalence and severity of late effects in normal rat duodenum following intraoperative irradiation

In humans, a portion of the duodenum is often at risk for radiation-induced complications following intraoperative radiation therapy for pancreatic carcinoma. To determine experimentally the prevalence and severity of late effects in the normal mammalian duodenum, 190 rats received single doses of 0, 15, 20, 25, 30, or 40 Gy orthovoltage X rays to temporarily exteriorized 3 cm circumferential segments of duodenum. The animals were killed 2, 6, 8, or 10 months later. Actuarial survival, change in body weight, and a radiation injury score based on eight histopathologic alterations were used as endpoints. Epithelial atypia, intestinal wall fibrosis, serosal thickening, and vascular sclerosis were the dominant histopathologic alterations at all dose levels throughout the 10-month observation period. The prevalence and severity of histologic radiation injury showed sigmoidal dose-response relationships with the plateaus starting at 20 Gy. Doses of 20 Gy or greater also resulted in a substantial loss of body weight and a high level of early deaths (20-80 days). All endpoints indicate that intraoperative doses of 20 Gy or greater are associated with unacceptable risks of late and irreversible complications.

Management of pain in pancreatic cancer

Potentially useful modalities of pain control in pancreatic cancer include antitumor therapy, pharmacotherapy, celiac plexus block, splanchnic nerve block, intercostal nerve block, and psychological intervention. These modalities are often used concurrently in treating the multiple dimensions that affect pain. Although thorough assessments are lacking, preliminary data suggest that antitumor chemotherapy and radiotherapy and celiac plexus block are especially useful modalities of pain control in these patients. The optimal time in the disease course for intervention with celiac plexus block is not known. Further studies are needed to clarify the nature of pain syndromes involved and the role of the various therapeutic modalities.

Pancreatic cancer. Evaluation of prognostic factors and treatment results

From 1969 to 1984, 125 patients (49 women and 76 men) with pancreatic cancer were treated at the Department of Radiotherapy at Turku University Central Hospital. The mean age of the patients was 63 years. Surgery was the only treatment in 40 cases, 22 patients received radiotherapy, 27 chemotherapy, and 13 received both radiotherapy and chemotherapy after surgery or as the only treatment; 23 patients received no active therapy. The average survival time was 7.5 months. The mean survival times of patients in the purely surgical group was 8.1 months, in the radiotherapy group 8.7 months, in the chemotherapy group 8.1 months, and in the group which received both radiotherapy and chemotherapy 9.7 months. The average survival time of patients who received neither surgical nor oncological treatment was significantly shorter (3.2 months). Statistically significant factors regarding shorter survival times were metastases at presentation (survival time 3.9 months), and poor general condition (Karnofsky index less than 60; survival time 4.4 months).