Skin responses to step-up and step-down heating in C3H mice

Effects on the expression of heat shock proteins by step-down heating and hypothermia in rat hepatoma cells with a different degree of heat sensitivity

Thermosensitization induced by pretreatment at supra- and subnormal temperatures, rate of protein synthesis and expression of the major heat shock proteins under such conditions was investigated in relation to intrinsic heat sensitivity of rat hepatoma cells, i.e. Reuber H35 and HTC. The high degree of heat susceptibility of H35 cells was reflected by a high degree of thermosensitization after pretreatment by heat (step-down heating) at temperatures of 42-44 degrees C for 30 min or cold for 16 h at temperatures ranging from 0 to 25 degrees C. Sensitization under step-down heating conditions was found to be paralleled by a delayed recovery of protein synthesis. Despite an increased relative rate, enhancement of the absolute rate of synthesis of the major heat shock proteins, HSP28, HSP60, HSP68, HSP70, HSP84 and HSP100, was less pronounced during step-down exposure. Comparable results were obtained during recovery of sensitized H35 cells at 37 degrees C after exposure to heat following pretreatment at 0 degrees C. Furthermore, clear differences in the regulation of the specific HSP synthesis, depending on the particular treatment protocol, were observed.

Winner of the Lund Science Award 1992. Thermosensitization induced by step-down heating. A review on heat-induced sensitization to hyperthermia alone or hyperthermia combined with radiation

A few minute's exposure to a high temperature (sensitizing treatment, ST) may substantially increase the cytotoxic and the radiosensitizing effect of a subsequent heating at a lower temperature (test treatment, TT). This phenomenon, which is known as step-down heating (SDH) or thermosensitization, has been observed both in cultured cells in vitro and in tumours and normal tissues in vivo. The effect of SDH increases with a lowering of TT temperature, but it is rapidly lost at temperatures very close to 37 degrees C. SDH-induced thermosensitization decays within a few hours, when an interval is inserted between ST and TT. In vitro results suggest an exponential decay of the SDH effect with half times ranging from 1.5- to 3.1 h. The effect of SDH increases with increasing ST time or temperature. For single heating, the Arrhenius plot is biphasic with activation energies of 500-800 and 1200-1700 kJ/mol above and below a break point temperature in the region 42.5-43.0 degrees C, respectively. For SDH, the Arrhenius plot gradually becomes monophasic with increasing severity of ST and it approaches asymptotically to an activation energy of about 400 kJ/mol. The reduction of the activation energy depends on cell survival after the priming ST and not on the specific ST heating time or temperature. SDH strongly enhances hyperthermic radiosensitization with a 5-6-fold reduction of the radiation dose required to achieve tumour control. The thermosensitizing and the radiosensitizing effects of SDH have several features in common. Both effects become more prominent when the TT temperature is decreased and when the ST heating time or temperature increases. In addition, the decay kinetics for both effects are comparable. For heat alone, the effect of SDH in tumour and normal tissue seems to be quantitatively similar. However, the therapeutic ratio may be increased by combining SDH with radiation. Biologically, the critical subcellular targets involved in the SDH effect have not been revealed. However, the ability of SDH to inhibit the clearance of heat-induced aggregation of proteins in the nucleus is interesting. Blockage of the nuclear function by proteins is a central theory in the present molecular biological models for both cell kill by heat and heat radiosensitization. Clinically, SDH may be an advantage since even a short exposure to high temperature increases the effect of an otherwise inadequate heat treatment. The disadvantages are that SDH complicates thermal dose calculations, and may cause unacceptable damage to normal tissue.

Effect of chronic thermotolerance on thermosensitization in Chinese hamster ovary cells studied at various temperatures

The effect of chronic thermotolerance on the thermal responses of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells to single and step-down heating was studied. Thermotolerance was induced by pre-heating exponentially growing cells at 39 degrees C for 9 h, followed by test treatments for variable times at temperatures ranging from 39 to 43 degrees C. In the temperature range studied, the heat sensitivity of thermotolerant CHO cells was characterized by an Arrhenius activation energy of Ea = 1175 +/- 40 kJ/mol. This value agreed well with Ea = 1180 +/- 45 kJ/mol measured after single heating, indicating that the induction of chronic thermotolerance did not affect the activation energy for cell killing by heat. Thermosensitization was studied after a priming treatment at 43 degrees C for 50 min followed by step-down heating at temperatures ranging from 39 to 43 degrees C. The temperature dependence of the thermal response after step-down heating was characterized by an activation energy of Ea = 490 +/- 17 kJ/mol. When the cells were pre-treated for 1-16 h at 39 degrees C prior to step-down heating (43 degrees C, 50 min, followed by graded exposure to 39-43 degrees C), the activation energy was gradually enhanced and approached Ea = 825 +/- 42 kJ/mol for 39 degrees C, 16 h. This change in Ea reflects the effect of thermotolerance on the priming treatment at 43 degrees C for 50 min, whereas the effect on the final test treatment resulted in a parallel shift of the Arrhenius curve without changing the slope, indicating that the effect of thermotolerance on the priming and the test treatment is expressed in the Arrhenius diagram in different ways.

Sensitization to hyperthermia induced in a normal tissue by step-down heating

The effect of step-down heating was investigated in the skin of the CDF1 mouse foot. Step-down heating was induced with a 44.7 degrees C/10 min pretreatment followed by a test treatment at a lower temperature for variable time. Step-up heating, that is, a test treatment followed by a 44.7 degrees C/10 min treatment, and single heating were used as controls. The normal tissue reaction was scored at five levels of damage (from slight redness and oedema to loss of a toe or greater reaction), and the heating time to induce each level in 50% of the animals, RD50, was used as the endpoint. The effect of step-down heating was quantified by the step-down ratio, calculated as the ratio of test heating times to obtain the endpoint. A significant reduction of the RD50 was seen at all score levels when the 44.7 degrees C/10 min was given in a step-down heating schedule, and the effect increased with decreasing test treatment temperature. In contrast, the heat sensitivity was only marginally influenced by step-up heating. An analysis of the time-temperature relationship demonstrated a log-linear relationship between temperature and RD50 for single heating in the range 42.2-44.7 degrees C and for step-down heating in the range 41.7-44.7 degrees C. The curve for step-down heating showed a lesser slope indicating a decrease of the activation energy. The kinetics of the SDH effect were investigated by inserting an interval between a primary 44.7 degrees C/10 min treatment and a test treatment performed at 42.2 degrees C. The effect of step-down heating was maximal with no interval between the priming treatment and the test treatment. As the interval was increased to 1.5 hr the step-down sensitization disappeared, and with even longer intervals thermotolerance developed. From a clinical point of view, the present data indicate that step-down heating may increase the extent of both reversible and irreversible heat damage in the normal tissue.

Step-down heating in a C3H mammary carcinoma in vivo: effects of varying the time and temperature of the sensitizing treatment

The effect of step-down heating (SDH), consisting of an initial sensitizing treatment (ST) performed at either 44.5 degrees C or 43.5 degrees C followed by a lower temperature test treatment (TT), was investigated in a C3H mammary carcinoma in vivo. A linear relationship between heating time and tumour growth delay was observed for all temperature combinations applied. At a given TT temperature, SDH increased the slope of the dose-response curve compared to the curve for tumours, single-heated without an initial ST. The slope of the SDH curves increased asymptotically towards a plateau value as the ST time at 44.5 degrees C was increased. The time-temperature relationship for single heating was described by a biphasic Arrhenius curve with activation energies of 1361 +/- 34 and 666 +/- 54 kJ/mol below and above an inflection point at 42.5 degrees C, respectively. For SDH, the Arrhenius curve gradually became straight with increasing ST time, and the activation energy saturated at a value of 425 +/- 25 kJ/mol. The reduction of the activation energy at an ST temperature of 43.5 degrees C was due rather to the extent of ST heat damage than to the ST time or temperature used. These results may be relevant for calculations of thermal doses, since even a short temperature peak (e.g. 44.5 degrees C/5 min) significantly changed the time-temperature relationship.

Step-down heating of CHO cells at 37.5-39 degrees C

The thermosensitizing effect of step-down heating was studied using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Exponentially growing cells were given priming heat treatments at 43 degrees C for 45 or 90 min, immediately followed by a second exposure to a temperature ranging from 37.5 to 39 degrees C. The measured rates of cell killing, 1/D0, increased exponentially with temperature; the slopes correspond to Arrhenius activation energies of Ea = 1200 +/- 150 kJ mol-1 and Ea = 1275 +/- 125 kJ mol-1 for cells preheated at 43 degrees C for 45 or 90 min, respectively. For the temperature range 39-43 degrees C an activation energy of Ea = 561 +/- 24 kJ mol-1 was obtained for step-down heated cells (43 degrees C, 45 min followed by T = 39-43 degrees C). These results indicate that there is a 'second inflection point' at 39 degrees C on the Arrhenius curve for step-down heating of CHO cells. Data evaluation using a mathematical model published previously (H. Jung, Radiation Research, 106, 56-72, 1986) showed that the rate constant c for the conversion of nonlethal lesions into lethal events increased with an activation energy of Ea = 1520 +/- 140 kJ mol-1 in the temperature range from 37.5-39 degrees C. For 39-45 degrees C the activation energy for c was Ea = 360 +/- 26 kJ mol-1, indicating that the temperature dependence of c shows a break at 39 degrees C similar to that observed on the 1/D0 Arrhenius plot.

Suppression of contact sensitivity by local hyperthermia treatment due to reduced Langerhans cell population in mice

The effects of local hyperthermia treatment on contact sensitivity (CS) and on the number of Langerhans cells (LCs) were studied in mice. CS was significantly suppressed when mice were sensitized in the hyperthermia treated skin I, 2 or 4 days after treatment (43 degrees C for 45 min). This suppressive effect was not observed 7 or 14 days after the treatment. CS was also suppressed when mice were sensitized in non-treated skin I day after the treatment. The density of LCs detected as ATPase-positive cells also decreased significantly 1, 2, 4 and 7 days after the treatment. There appeared to be a positive correlation between the number of LCs and the extent of CS when mice were sensitized at hyperthermia treated skin. It was observed that this suppressive effect on CS was dose- and temperature-dependent. It could be transferred by spleen cells from the hyperthermia treated and DNFB-sensitized donors, and was antigen specific when spleen cells were transferred before sensitization of the recipient mice. This indicated it was, in part, associated with the induction of suppressor cells. These findings suggest that local hyperthermia treatment reduces the number of LCs with subsequent suppression of the induction phase of delayed-type hypersensitivity by the generation of antigen-specific suppressor cells.

Effect of step-down heating on hyperthermic radiosensitization in an experimental tumor and a normal tissue in vivo

The effect of step-down heating (SDH) on the radiosensitization induced by simultaneous hyperthermia and radiation was investigated in a C3H mammary carcinoma inoculated into the feet of CDF1 mice and the skin of normal CDF1 feet. SDH consisted of a sensitizing treatment (ST) of 44.5 degrees C/10 min followed by a test treatment (TT) of 41.5 degrees C for 30, 60 or 120 min. Simultaneous administration of radiation and hyperthermia was achieved by delivering radiation in the middle of the TT. The endpoint selected was the radiation dose needed to achieve either tumor control or moist desquamation in 50% of the animals. The results were evaluated by the thermal enhancement ratio (TER), defined as dose of radiation needed to achieve endpoint in relation to dose of combined radiation and hyperthermia needed to achieve the endpoint. SDH of tumors increased the TER significantly compared with step-up heating (SUH). The ratios between TCD50 values for corresponding SDH and SUH increased with TT heating time and at 120 min a 2.5-fold increase in the radiosensitizing effect was achieved. It has previously been shown that SDH alone causes thermosensitization in tumors by decreasing the activation energy. However, the effect was too small to explain the increased radiosensitization observed with SDH. In the normal tissue studies SDH combined with radiation treatment gave a lower TER compared to the SDH tumor results, suggesting a possible therapeutic gain.

The effect of step-down heating on mouse small intestinal mucosa

Step-down heating (SDH) was investigated in mouse small intestine by giving a primary (conditioning) treatment at or above 43 degrees C followed by a test treatment below 43 degrees C. Crypt dose-response curves following SDH were compared with those obtained using the test treatment alone; the SDH effect was characterized by a reduction in shoulder (an additive effect) and an increase in slope (thermosensitization). The thermosensitization ratio, defined as slope SDH-heated/slope single-heated, was independent of the conditioning temperature but increased to a maximum of approximately three as the duration of conditioning increased. Thermosensitization was eliminated when the conditioning treatment was itself sufficient to cause significant crypt loss and, also, when the interval between the two treatments was 0.5 h or longer. This period was less than that required for either recovery of the 'shoulder' on the crypt dose-response curve or the development of thermotolerance following the primary treatment. Thermotolerance which develops in intestine during prolonged hyperthermia (after approximately 100 min) was not affected by SDH and Arrhenius analysis indicated that the activation energy for temperatures below 43 degrees C was not significantly altered by SDH. In summary, the SDH effect on small intestine, assessed using the crypt loss endpoint, was similar to thermosensitization observed in vitro. However, the lower magnitude of the effect and its complex dependence on the primary heat treatment suggest either that crypt cells respond to SDH in a unique and characteristic manner or that the crypt assay in vivo and reproductive survival in vitro do not reflect the same endpoint.

Factors of importance for the development of the step-down heating effect in a C3H mammary carcinoma in vivo

The effect of step-down heating (SDH) was investigated in a C3H mammary carcinoma inoculated into the feet of CDF1 mice. The SDH effect was evaluated by comparing slopes of time versus growth delay curves of SDH-heated with the curve for single-heated controls. The effect was quantified by a ratio: 'step-down ratio' (SDR), defined as slope (SDH-heated)/slope (single-heated). Step-down heating resulted in thermosensitization in contrast to step-up heating which did not affect the heat sensitivity. The kinetics of the step-down heating effect was investigated by inserting an interval between a 44.5 degrees C/10 min sensitizing treatment (ST) and a 42.0 degrees C test treatment (TT). The effect of SDH was maximal with no interval between ST and TT (SDR = 2.3), decayed within 2 h and turned into thermotolerance. This thermotolerance was maximal after 12 h and decayed within 120 h. The effect of varying the TT temperature was investigated in the range 39.0-44.5 degrees C (ST = 44.5 degrees C/10 min). Below 42.5 degrees C the SDR value increased exponentially, and even a 39 degrees C TT produced a significant heat damage. An Arrhenius analysis was made showing a straight line in the whole temperature range with an activation energy of 526 kJ/mol and an increased activation entropy. These data show that thermosensitization can be induced by SDH in C3H mammary carcinomas in vivo. The effect seems to decay within 2 h, and by decreasing the heat activation energies the effect of low temperature heating is increased.

Evidence for an upper temperature limit for thermotolerance development in L1A2 tumour cells in vitro

The response of L1A2 cells in vitro to water bath hyperthermia was investigated. In previous studies in the temperature range 40.5-45.0 degrees C, an Arrhenius plot for heat killing of L1A2 cells was linear, and thermotolerance did not develop during continuous heating. The present Arrhenius analysis was extended to the range 38-45 degrees C, and the Arrhenius plot was biphasic with an inflection point at 40.5 degrees C, below which the activation energy was significantly increased from 724 to 923 kJ/mol (P less than 0.001). In order to test for the development of thermotolerance during continuous heating, the cells were heated in the range 38-41 degrees C for 10 h, followed immediately by a graded test treatment at 42 degrees C. Thermotolerance developed below 40.5 degrees C as shown by an increased D0 of the 42 degrees C survival curve, but not at 40.5 and 41 degrees C. Preheating for 90 min at 42 degrees C followed by a 10 h incubation at 37 degrees C resulted in maximal thermotolerance with a thermotolerance ratio of approximately 4.3, a ratio also obtained if the cells were incubated for 10 h at temperatures of 38-40 degrees C. No thermotolerance was observed at incubation temperatures of 40.5 degrees C and above. Thus, in the L1A2 cells 40 degrees C is the upper temperature permissive for thermotolerance development, and the data support the assumption that the inflection point on the Arrhenius plot reflects the upper limit for thermotolerance development.

Effects of methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) on tumour and skin responses to hyperthermia in mice

Effects of methylglyoxal bis(guanylhydrazone) (MGBG) on tumour and skin responses to hyperthermia (42 degrees C) were examined in C3H mice. MGBG (50 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally to mice 4 hours before hyperthermic treatment. The tumour (FM3A) growth time was elongated by an amount dependent on the exposure time of treatment at 42 degrees C (60, 90 and 120 min). Pre-treatment of mice with MGBG (50 mg/kg, i.p.) apparently further lengthened the tumour growth time after treatment at 42 degrees C. No significant damage of foot skin was caused by 42 degrees C hyperthermia. Pre-treatment with MGBG did not make the foot skin susceptible to the heating. From these findings, it can be considered that MGBG or related less-toxic compounds may have a clinical advantage for the mild (42 degrees C) hyperthermic treatment in cancer therapy.