A new combined approach in the conservative management of rectal cancer

Brachytherapy and local excision for sphincter preservation in T1 and T2 rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To report long-term results of brachytherapy after local excision (LE) in the treatment of T1 and T2 rectal cancer at risk of recurrence due to residual subclinical disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1989 and 2007, 32 patients undergoing LE and brachytherapy were followed prospectively for a mean of 6.2 years. Estimates of local recurrence (LR), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) were generated. Treatment-related toxicity and the effect of known prognostic factors were determined.

RESULTS

There were 8 LR (3 T1, 5 T2), of which 5 were salvaged surgically. Median time to the 8 LR was 14 months, and the 5-year rate of local control was 76%. Although there have been 9 deaths to date, only 5 were from disease. Five-year DSS and OS rates were 85% and 78%, respectively. There were 4 cases of Grade 2-3 radionecrosis and 1 case of mild stool incontinence. The sphincter was preserved in 27 of 32 patients.

CONCLUSION

Local excision and adjuvant brachytherapy for T1 and T2 rectal cancer is an appealing treatment alternative to immediate radical resection, particularly in the frail and elderly who are unable to undergo major surgery, as well as for patients wanting to avoid a permanent colostomy.

Local excision for ypT2 rectal cancer--much ado about something

BACKGROUND

The role of local excision for pT2 distal rectal cancer has been challenged because of the observation of high rates of lymph node metastases and local failure. However, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) has led to increased local disease control and significant tumor downstaging, possibly decreasing rates of lymph node metastases. In this setting, a possible role for local excision of ypT2 has been suggested.

METHODS

A total of 401 patients with distal rectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant CRT. Tumor response assessment was performed after at least 8 weeks from CRT completion. One hundred and twelve patients with complete clinical response were not immediately operated on and were excluded from the study, and 289 patients with incomplete clinical response were managed by radical surgery. Patients with final pathological stage ypT2 were analyzed to determine the risk of unfavorable pathological features that could represent unacceptable risk for local failure after local excision.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight (30%) patients had ypT2 rectal cancer. Final ypT status was not associated with pretreatment radiological staging (p = 0.62). ypT status was significantly associated with the risk of lymph node metastases, risk of perineural and vascular invasion, and recurrence (p = 0.001). Lymph node metastases were present in 19% of patients with ypT2 rectal cancer. The risk of lymph node metastases in ypT2 was associated with the presence of perineural invasion (47% vs 4%; p = <0.001), vascular invasion (59% vs 6%; p < 0.001), and decreased mean interval CRT surgery (12 vs 18 weeks; p < 0.001), but not with mean tumor size (3.2 vs 3.1 cm; p = 0.8). Disease-free and overall survival rates were significantly better for patients with ypT2N0 (p = 0.02 and 0.006, respectively). Fifty-five (63%) patients with ypT2 had at least one unfavorable pathological feature for local excision (lymph node metastases, vascular or perineural invasion, mucinous type or tumor size >3 cm).

CONCLUSION

Lymph node metastases were present in 19% of patients with ypT2 and were significantly associated with poor overall and disease-free survival rates. The risk of lymph node metastases could not be predicted by radiological staging or tumor size. Radical surgery should be considered the standard treatment option for ypT2 rectal cancer after CRT.

Is local excision of T2/T3 rectal cancers adequate?

In selected patients, local excision of rectal cancer may be an alternative to radical surgery such as abdominoperineal excision of the rectum or anterior resection. Local excision carries lower mortality and morbidity, without the functional disturbance or alteration in body image that can be associated with radical surgery. There are several techniques of local therapy for rectal cancer, with most experience being available in transanal excision. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is also used but experience with this newer technique is limited. Patient selection is the most important factor in successful local excision; however, specific criteria for selecting patients have not been universally accepted. Review of the published literature is difficult because of the variation in adjuvant therapy regimes and follow-up strategies, as well as results reported in terms of local recurrence and survival rates. There is increasing evidence to suggest that local excision should be restricted to patients with T1-stage rectal cancer without high-risk factors. The place for local excision in patients with T2 or high-risk T1 tumours requires prospective, randomised multicentre trials comparing radical surgery with local excision, with or without adjuvant therapy. Local excision for T3 tumours should be restricted to the palliative setting or patients unfit for radical surgery.

Preoperative chemoradiation in patients with resectable rectal cancer: results on tumor response

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus about the role of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) in patients with resectable cancer of the distal rectum. This study analyzed the local clinical and pathologic response in patients receiving preoperative RT/CT for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Thirty-two consecutive patients with a palpable adenocarcinoma of the rectum received preoperative RT (45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks) plus continuous chemotherapy with doxifluridine and leucovorin or 5-fluorouracil by continuous intravenous infusion during RT. Surgery was performed 8 weeks later. The Wilcoxon and chi(2) tests were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve patients had mild gastrointestinal toxicity, only one of whom required interruption of therapy. The tumor shrank to 57.8% of its original size, and at the echoendoscopy (u) there was a 58.7% decrease of the maximum diameter (P <.001). Downstaging from uT3 and uT2 to <uT3 and <uT2, respectively, occurred in 41.6% of patients (P =.0020). Total and major regression of the tumor at the histopathologic examination occurred in 12.5% and 50% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Local response to preoperative RT/CT was highly satisfactory and allowed conservative surgery in 81% of patients. Optimization of the combined therapy could achieve even better results.

Local excision of rectal cancer: what is the evidence?

PURPOSE

Although local excision of rectal cancers is a less morbid alternative to radical resection, its role as a curative procedure is unclear. The role of adjuvant therapy after local excision is also controversial. This review aims to examine current evidence on local excision of rectal cancers and how it fits into the management algorithm for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A literature review was undertaken through the MEDLINE database and by cross-referencing previous publications, thus identifying 41 studies on curative local excision of rectal cancer published in English. Details of preoperative staging, surgical procedures, adjuvant therapy, follow-up, and outcome measures, including complications, survival data, recurrences, and salvage were examined.

RESULTS

Preoperative staging of rectal cancers is variable. Digital rectal examination and computerized tomography are used in most studies. Endorectal ultrasound is used in some patients in 9 of 41 studies. Local excision preserves anorectal function, and seems to have limited morbidity (0-22 percent). Local excision alone is associated with local recurrences in 9.7 (range, 0-24) percent of T1, 25 (range, 0-67) percent of T2 and 38 (range, 0-100) percent of T3 cancers. The addition of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after local excision yields local recurrence rates of 9.5 (range, 0-50) percent for T1, 13.6 (range, 0-24) percent for T2, and 13.8 (range, 0-50) percent for T3 cancers. Data on local excision after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for tumor down staging are limited. Factors other than T-stage that lead to higher local recurrence rates after local excision include poor histologic grade, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and positive margins. Local recurrences after local excision can be surgically salvaged (84 of 114 patients in 15 studies), with a disease-free survival rates between 40 and 100 percent at a follow-up of 0.1 to 13.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Local excision for rectal cancers is associated with a low morbidity and provides satisfactory local control and disease-free survival rates for T1 rectal cancers. There is, however, a need for a randomized, controlled trial for T2 cancers, comparing local excision with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to radical resection.

Preoperative radiation therapy for patients with T2-T3 carcinoma of the middle-to-lower rectum

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of preoperative radiation therapy (RT) on the objective responses of patients with rectal carcinoma to their treatment. These effects were assessed with endorectal ultrasound (EUS) evaluation, histopathologic grading of postirradiation tumor mass reduction in the surgical specimen, and analysis of local and distant recurrences.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients with palpable adenocarcinoma of the rectum, classified by EUS examination as uT2-uT3 (which meant involvement of the muscular layer and the perirectal adipose tissue, respectively), received 45 grays (Gy) over 3 weeks (2 fractions per day of 1.5 Gy each) given as photons supplied through a high-energy linear accelerator (18 MeV) through 3 fields: 1 posterior and 2 opposed lateral. Surgery was scheduled 2-3 weeks after the end of RT and included a sphincter-saving resection (39 patients) and an abdominoperineal resection (20 patients).

RESULTS

Greatest tumor dimension, which was evaluated with rectal endoscopy before RT and measurement of the lesion in the fresh specimen, showed a decrease among two-thirds of the patients; the decrease amounted to approximately one-third of the initial measurement. An echoendoscopic downstaging of the T component was observed among 24.5% of the patients. Complete tumor regression occurred in 8.5% of patients, whereas in 69% only the presence of rare residual cancer cells and prominent fibrosis were found at the pathologic examination of the specimen. Finally, the tumor regressed to pT0 and pT1 in 13.6% of the patients. The overall and disease free 2-year survival rates were 94.0% and 73.7%, respectively, for pT2 and pT3 patients, and 100% for those whose tumors regressed to pT0-pT1 after a median follow-up of 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperfractionated preoperative RT appears to be efficient in achieving tumor shrinkage and destroying the tumor. In this study, the subset of patients with a good response to RT therapy had an excellent clinical outcome at the time of a 2-year follow-up.

Sphincter preservation in rectal cancer with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis: long term follow-up

BACKGROUND

To determine if preoperative radiation therapy allows sphincter preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS

Thirty six patients with the diagnosis of invasive, resectable, primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis were enrolled on a Phase I/II trial of preoperative radiation therapy plus low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. By preoperative assessment, all patients had invasive tumors (5,T2; 31,T3) involving the distal half of the rectum and clinically required an abdominoperineal resection. The median tumor size was 3.8 cm [range: 1.5-7 cm] and the median distance from the anal verge was 4 cm [range: 3-7 cm]. The whole pelvis received 46.80 Gy followed by a 3.60 Gy boost to the primary tumor bed. The median follow-up was 56 months [range: 4-121 months].

RESULTS

Of the 35 patients who underwent resection, 5 (14%) had a complete pathologic response and 27 (77%) were able to successfully undergo a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. The incidence of local failure was crude: 17% and 5-year actuarial: 21%. The 5-year actuarial survival was 64%. Analysis of sphincter function using a previously published scale was performed at the time of last follow-up in the 27 patients who underwent a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. Function was good or excellent in 85%. The median number of bowel movements/day was 2 (range: 0-8).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that preoperative radiation therapy allows sphincter preservation in 77% of selected patients who would otherwise require an abdominoperineal resection, and 85% have good to excellent sphincter function. Given the moderate local failure rate, we now routinely use preoperative combined modality therapy plus postoperative chemotherapy for patients with clinical T3 disease.

Sphincter preservation therapy for distal rectal carcinoma: a review

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing interest in the use of sphincter-preserving therapy for patients with distal rectal carcinomas. The outcomes of conservative treatments for early stage rectal carcinoma appear to be comparable to that achieved with abdominoperineal resection.

METHODS

Retrospective and prospective clinical series of patients with distal rectal carcinoma treated by local excision alone, local excision with postoperative adjuvant therapy, preoperative radiation followed by local excision, or radical circumferential sphincter-sparing surgeries were reviewed. The local control rates, salvage rates, and treatment complications in patients treated by these various methods were examined.

RESULTS

Patients with T1 distal rectal carcinoma with favorable clinical and histopathologic characteristics treated with local excision alone had a local control rate of greater than 90% in most series. Postoperative chemoradiation improved local control for those with T1 disease with unfavorable characteristics, or those with T2 disease. Most T3 patients had failure rates of greater than 30% despite adjuvant local and systemic therapy. With high dose preoperative radiation, approximately 80% of patients with locally advanced or unresectable tumors were able to undergo sphincter-preservation treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with favorable T1 rectal carcinoma are likely to be adequately treated with local excision alone. Patients with T1 disease with unfavorable characteristics as well as T2 patients will benefit from postoperative chemoradiation. The use of local therapy in T3 patients needs to be carefully considered because these patients are at relatively high risk for local recurrence despite adjuvant therapy. Preoperative radiation followed by either local excision or radical circumferential sphincter-sparing resections appears promising in allowing sphincter preservation in patients with locally advanced tumors.

Long-term follow-up of local excision and radiation therapy for invasive rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Little is known regarding the long-term outcome of patients with rectal cancer treated by local excision and radiation therapy. We updated our institutional experience with this approach.

METHODS

From January 1986 to December 1991, 23 patients (median age, 64 (range, 30-80) years) with mobile, moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of the rectum were offered transanal excision. Two patients with large T3 tumors, who were judged intraoperatively to be unsuited for a local procedure, received radical resection and were excluded from analysis. Twenty-one patients underwent transanal excision en bloc (14) or piece-meal (7) through a resectoscope. Seven patients (74 percent) had either extensive medical problems or refused a colostomy. Patients received a median of 5,040 cGy postoperatively, and 15 also received 500 cGy preoperatively on protocol. Two patients received concomitant chemotherapy. Median follow-up is 56 months for all patients and 67 months for survivors (range, 27-92 months).

RESULTS

There were 2 T1, 15 T2, and 4 T3 tumors. The distance from the anal verge was a median of 4 (range, 1-7) cm. The median tumor size was 3 (range, 2-7) cm. Sixteen patients had more than one-third of the wall involved. Four patients (19 percent) developed a local recurrence at 26, 30, 33, and 48 (median, 31.5) months. Three were salvaged (abdominoperineal resection = 2; low anterior resection = 1) and remain disease-free 18, 36, and 37 months postoperatively. Four patients (19 percent) developed metastases (lung = 3; liver = 1) at 3, 22, 25 and 44 months after initial treatment (median, 23.5 months). The actuarial five-year overall, disease-free and recurrence-free survival are 77, 75, and 58 percent, respectively. Twelve patients (57 percent) have no evidence of disease while retaining their rectum. There was one postoperative death.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up confirms that local excision and radiation therapy is of value in patients with mobile tumors of the rectum. It suggests that this treatment can be offered to those patients who refuse a colostomy or are medically compromised and may be an acceptable option for selected patients with T2 or T3, mobile adenocarcinomas of the rectum.

Radiation treatment for rectal cancer

Radiation treatment is widely used in the management of adenocarcinomas of the rectum, either alone or more frequently as part of multimodality treatment protocols. External beam radiation is capable of eradicating about one-third of bulky but mobile primary rectal cancers and is an alternative to be considered when standard surgery is not possible. Endorectal irradiation, either alone or combined with external beam treatment, has proved highly effective for selected superficial cancers of the distal rectum. Irradiation alone or in conjunction with cytotoxic chemotherapy appears to reduce the risk of tumor progression at the primary site or in regional lymph nodes when combined with local surgical excisions that preserve anorectal function. The treatment of recurrent and metastatic cancer frequently provides palliation, although cure by irradiation is rare.

Sphincter preservation with preoperative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis

PURPOSE

To determine if preoperative radiation therapy allows sphincter preservation in the treatment of rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients with the diagnosis of invasive, resectable, primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis were enrolled on a Phase I/II trial of preoperative radiation therapy plus low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. By preoperative assessment, all patients had invasive tumors (2: T2 28:T3) involving the distal half of the rectum and required an abdominoperineal resection. The median tumor size was 4 cm (range: 1.5-6 cm) and the median distance from the anal verge was 4 cm (range: 3-7 cm). The whole pelvis received 46.8 Gy followed by a 3.60 Gy boost to the primary tumor bed. The median follow-up was 43 months (range: 6-82 months).

RESULTS

Of the 29 patients who underwent resection, 3 (10%) had a complete pathologic response and 24 (83%) were able to successfully undergo a low anterior resection/colonanal anastomosis. The incidence of local failure was crude: 17% and 4-year actuarial: 23%. The 4-year actuarial survival was 75%. One patient developed a partial disruption of the anastomosis and two developed rectal stenosis. Analysis of sphincter function using a previously published scale was performed at the time of last follow-up in 22 of the 24 patients who underwent a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. Function was good or excellent in 77%. The median number of bowel movements/day was two (range: 1-6).

CONCLUSIONS

This technique may be an alternative to an abdominoperineal resection in selected patients. Continued follow-up is needed to determine if this approach ultimately has similar local control and survival rates as an abdominoperineal resection.

Results of surgical treatment of nonhepatic recurrence of colorectal carcinoma

The sites of first recurrence of colorectal cancer include liver (more than 30%), lung and locoregional disease (20-25%), other intraabdominal sites (15-20%), and elsewhere (10%). Isolated locoregional disease accounts for 5-19% of colon recurrences and 7-33% of rectal recurrences. Between 7% and 20% of locally recurrent colorectal cancer can be resected with curative intent. Overall, complete resection of a localized recurrence yields a mean survival of 33-59 months, with long-term survival achieved in 30-50% of patients. Regional recurrence of rectal cancer may require abdominal-sacral resection for adequate margins, with 5-year survival of 18-24%. Early identification (by close monitoring) and accurate staging of recurrence are essential for potentially curative resection. Long-term survival depends on extent of recurrence and completeness of resection. Symptomatic recurrence to the ovaries that requires reoperation occurs in approximately 2% of patients; presentation usually is as part of a diffuse intraabdominal process, and resection is rarely curative. Isolated pulmonary metastases occur in 2-4% of patients experiencing disease recurrence; such tumors are resectable in half of the patients. After the tumors are surgically resected, long-term survival can be expected in 30-40% of patients, with prognosis variably associated with disease-free interval, number and size of lung metastases, and location and stage of the primary tumor. Newer techniques of postoperative monitoring after resection of the primary lesion, more sensitive preoperative and intraoperative staging of recurrences, and the use of intraoperative radiation therapy may increase surgical salvage of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Radiation therapy for colorectal cancer

The role of radiation therapy in the management of colorectal cancer has become more clearly defined as the number of clinical studies has grown. It is now evident that radiation is capable of sterilizing subclinical deposits of cancer at doses tolerable by adjacent normal tissues, and to a lesser extent, these doses can control more bulky cancers. The integration of radiation and chemotherapy has already led to some improvement in survival rates in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. The further development of such combinations seems likely to improve tumor control and survival rates in many stages of cancer. In the next decade, it is also likely that there will be refinement of the use of radiation through better understanding of the biology of colorectal cancer, perhaps supplemented by the development of predictive assays that can guide both the selection of patients for treatment and the choice of the most effective radiation schedule.

Adjuvant radiation therapy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite apparently complete resection of cancers of the rectum or colon, many patients have recurrences in the area from which their primary cancer was excised and in more distant organs. Radiation therapy has been used either alone or in combination with chemotherapy as an adjuvant to surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence.

METHODS

The literature describing the results of adjuvant radiation treatment for colorectal cancer was reviewed.

RESULTS

In randomized studies in patients with moderately advanced rectal cancers (T2-4 N0, M0 or N1-3, M0) adjuvant radiation therapy has often reduced the risk of pelvic recurrence, but has had little effect on survival rates or the risk of extrapelvic metastases. Recent reports show that combined radiation and chemotherapy can improve both disease-free survival and survival rates. Such treatment has caused only moderate toxicity in most studies. Nonrandomized studies in patients in whom small superficial rectal cancers are treated by local excision suggest that adjuvant radiation therapy reduces the risk of pelvic recurrence after this limited surgery and allows anorectal function to be preserved. Strategies similar to those developed for the treatment of rectal cancer are being studied in patients with colon cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In moderately advanced rectal cancers, the combination of chemotherapy and radiation is more effective than radiation alone in reducing local recurrence and increasing survival rates. Additional trials are needed to improve results and to refine drug and radiation schedules. Radiation alone may be sufficient as an adjuvant treatment when combined with local excision of small rectal cancers. The role of radiation in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer is investigational. There is a need to more accurately delineate the patients with colorectal cancer most likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Phase I/II trial of pre-operative radiation therapy and coloanal anastomosis in distal invasive resectable rectal cancer

A total of 22 patients with the diagnosis of invasive, resectable, primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum limited to the pelvis were enrolled on a Phase I/II trial of pre-operative radiation therapy+low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. By pre-operative assessment, all patients had invasive tumors involving the distal half of the rectum and required an abdominoperineal resection. The median tumor size was 4 cm (1.5-6 cm) and the median distance from the anal verge was 4 cm (3-7 cm). The whole pelvis received 4680 cGy followed by a 360 cGy boost to the primary tumor bed. The median follow-up was 29 months (10-60 months). Of the 21 patients who underwent resection, 10% had a complete pathologic response and 90% were able to successfully undergo a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis. The incidence of local failure as a component of failure was crude: 23% and 4-year actuarial: 32%. The 4-year actuarial survival was 61%. No patients experienced Grade 3 or 4 toxicity while receiving radiation therapy, and 6% developed a partial disruption of the anastomosis. Of the patients who underwent a low anterior resection/coloanal anastomosis, 89% had a good or excellent functional result. This technique may be an alternative to an abdominoperineal resection in selected patients. Further follow-up is needed in order to determine if this approach ultimately has similar local control and survival rates as an abdominoperineal resection.