Evaluation of radiotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: report from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG 82) Trial

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy and Concomitant Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Alone in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Axillary Nodes

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of postmastectomy radiotherapy (RT) combined with adjuvant chemotherapy compared to adjuvant chemotherapy alone as regards overall survival (OS), overall disease-free survival (ODFS), local disease-free survival (LDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS).

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively two non-randomized groups of premenopausal high-risk breast cancer patients treated from 1985 to 1990 in the following Institutions: Department of Radiation Oncology of Brescia University, "Istituto del Radio O. Alberti" (IRA), and Department of Oncology of Brescia Hospital "Beretta Foundation" (BF). A total of 163 patients was found to satisfy the criteria of the current analysis: 81 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy alone [6 cycles CMF(1-8)] at BF and 82 patients received postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy [8 cycles CMF(1-21)] at IRA. A modified CMF schedule was chosen at IRA to avoid the feared increase in toxicity due to the association with RT. Primary surgical treatment was modified radical mastectomy with axillary node dissection in both cases.

RESULTS

A statistically significant improvement in OS was found in systemic adjuvant therapy patients compared to those also given RT (77.6% vs 59%; P = 0.0025). No statistically significant improvement in ODFS was found in the CMF(1-8) arm compared to the RT and CMF(1-21) stm: 51.6% vs 43.6%; P = 0.46. A statistically significant improvement in LDFS at 5 years was found in irradiated patients (89.3% vs 76.2%; P <0.05). The DDFS was also improved, although without evidence of statistical significance, in the CMF(1-8) group: at 5 years 65% vs 44% (P = 0.059).

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirmed that RT reduces the risk of local recurrence but without a statistically significant reduction in mortality. The lack of a survival benefit may somehow reflect the dose reduction in CMF(1-21). The evidence that CMF(1-8) offers undoubtable advantages over the CMF(1-21) regimen in OS and, perhaps, in distant control suggests that the dose intensity of CMF in this setting may also be important. In fact, although many CMF(1-8) patients received a dose intensity lower than 100%, 95% of them received a dose intensity higher than the maximum one of the CMF(1-21) patients. Although our results should be interpreted with caution, they seem to provide further rationale for testing the association of postoperative radiotherapy and the CMF(1-8) regimen in stage II breast cancer with positive nodes and treated with demolitive surgery, as already done in the conservative management of breast cancer, also in view of the new support therapies now available (i.e. hematologic growth factors).

Postmastectomy irradiation in breast in breast cancer patients with T1-2 and 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes: is there a role for radiation therapy?

Background

We aimed to evaluate retrospectively the correlation of loco-regional relapse (LRR) rate, distant metastasis (DM) rate, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in a group of breast cancer (BC) patients who are at intermediate risk for LRR (T1-2 tumor and 1-3 positive axillary nodes) treated with or without postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) following modified radical mastectomy (MRM).

Methods

Ninety patients, with T1-T2 tumor, and 1-3 positive nodes who had undergone MRM received adjuvant systemic therapy with (n = 66) or without (n = 24) PMRT. Patient-related characteristics (age, menopausal status, pathological stage/tumor size, tumor location, histology, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, histological grade, nuclear grade, extracapsular extension, lymphatic, vascular and perineural invasion and ratio of involved nodes/dissected nodes) and treatment-related factors (PMRT, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy) were evaluated in terms of LRR and DM rate. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier DFS and OS rates were analysed.

Results

Differences between RT and no-RT groups were statistically significant for all comparisons in favor of RT group except OS: LRR rate (3%vs 17%, p = 0.038), DM rate (12% vs 42%, p = 0.004), 5 year DFS (82.4% vs 52.4%, p = 0.034), 5 year OS (90,2% vs 61,9%, p = 0.087). In multivariate analysis DM and lymphatic invasion were independent poor prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusion

PMRT for T1-2, N1-3 positive BC patients has to be reconsidered according to the prognostic factors and the decision has to be made individually with the consideration of long-term morbidity and with the patient approval.

Impact of high-dose chemotherapy on the ability to deliver subsequent local-regional radiotherapy for breast cancer: analysis of Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9082

PURPOSE

To report, from Cancer and Leukemia Group B Protocol 9082, the impact of high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and BCNU (HD-CPB) vs. intermediate-dose CPB (ID-CPB) on the ability to start and complete the planned course of local-regional radiotherapy (RT) for women with breast cancer involving >or=10 axillary nodes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1991 to 1998, 785 patients were randomized. The HD-CPB and ID-CPB arms were balanced regarding patient characteristics. The HD-CPB and ID-CPB arms were compared on the probability of RT initiation, interruption, modification, or incompleteness. The impact of clinical variables and interactions between variables were also assessed.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was initiated in 82% (325 of 394) of HD-CPB vs. 92% (360 of 391) of ID-CPB patients (p = 0.001). On multivariate analyses, RT was less likely given to patients who were randomized to HD treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0 .38, p < 0.001), older (p = 0.005), African American (p = 0.003), postmastectomy (p = 0.02), or estrogen receptor positive (p = 0.03). High-dose treatment had a higher rate of RT interruption (21% vs. 12%, p = 0.001, OR = 2.05), modification (29% vs. 14%, p = 0.001, OR = 2.46), and early termination of RT (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.0001, OR = 5.35), compared with ID.

CONCLUSION

Treatment arm significantly related to initiation, interruption, modification, and early termination of RT. Patients randomized to HD-CPB were less likely to initiate RT, and of those who did, they were more likely to have RT interrupted, modified, and terminated earlier than those randomized to ID-CPB. The observed lower incidence of RT usage in African Americans vs. non-African Americans warrants further study.

Postoperative proton radiotherapy for localized and locoregional breast cancer: potential for clinically relevant improvements?

PURPOSE

To study the potential reduction of dose to organs at risk (OARs) with intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy (IMPT) compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) photon radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Comparative treatment-planning was performed using planning computed tomography scans of 20 left-sided breast cancer patients. For each patient, three increasingly complex locoregional volumes (planning target volumes [PTVs]) were defined: whole breast (WB) or chest wall (CW) = (PTV1), WB/CW plus medial-supraclavicular (MSC), lateral-supraclavicular (LSC), and level III axillary (AxIII) nodes = (PTV2) and WB/CW+MSC+LSC+AxIII plus internal mammary chain = (PTV3). For each patient, 3D-CRT, IMRT, and IMPT plans were optimized for PTV coverage. Dose to OARs was compared while maintaining target coverage.

RESULTS

All the techniques met the required PTV coverage except the 3D-CRT plans for PTV3-scenario. All 3D-CRT plans for PTV3 exceeded left-lung V20. IMPT vs. 3D-CRT: significant dose reductions were observed for all OARs using IMPT for all PTVs. IMPT vs. IMRT: For PTV2 and PTV3, low (V5) left lung and cardiac doses were reduced by a factor >2.5, and cardiac doses (V22.5) were by a factor of >20 lower with IMPT compared with IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

When complex-target irradiation is needed, 3D-CRT often compromises the target coverage and increases the dose to OARs; IMRT can provide better results but will increase the integral dose. The benefit of IMPT is based on improved target coverage and reduction of low doses to OARs, potentially reducing the risk of late-toxicity. These results indicate a potential role of proton-radiotherapy for extended locoregional irradiation in left breast cancer.

Postoperative radiotherapy in DBCG during 30 years. Techniques, indications and clinical radiobiological experience

During the time period 1977-2007 postoperative radiotherapy in DBCG has varied considerably with regard to techniques and indications together with changes in the extent of surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy. The radiation treatment has been developed on the basis of clinical, radiophysical and radiobiological principles, encompassing also practical problems such as available equipment in the different centres and at times lack of sufficient machine capacity. The paper focus especially on the comprehensive work done prior to the DBCG 82 b&c studies, in order to optimize radiotherapy in all aspects prior to the evaluation of the efficacy of this treatment modality. The results from these trials did succeed in clear evidence that radiotherapy has an important role in the multidisciplinary treatment of early breast cancer. In parallel to these studies a new and challenging use of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery was evaluated in the DBCG TM 82 protocol. The experience obtained with different techniques in this study formed the basis for the current principles of radiotherapy after lumpectomy. Reduction of radiation related morbidity has been a major issue for the DBCG radiotherapy group, and in this aspect several studies, including quality control visits, have been carried out to make the relevant modifications and to evaluate deviations from the guidelines between the centres. The background for the changes in radiotherapy is described for each of the programme periods as well as future perspectives which will include further refinements of the target and adjustments of dose and fractionation in selected patients.

Is axillary clearance the standard of care for breast cancer patients with sentinel node involvement?

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has become accepted for staging the axilla in early breast cancer with avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with negative SNB. For those with positive SNB, the standard surgical management is ALND; however, this approach is increasingly being challenged. The central problem is that it is not possible to preoperatively predict whether the SNB will be positive, and it is even more difficult to determine the likelihood of nonsentinel node positivity. Various histopathological features indicate increased risk of nonsentinel node metastasis, including size of SNB metastasis, presence of lymphovascular invasion, multifocality, number of involved sentinel nodes and, conversely, the number of negative sentinel nodes. These features have been combined to produce predictive nomograms but, understandably, these still lack precision. Presently, the decision to avoid ALND will depend upon both the clinician and the patient's impression of risk, but if either requires assurance that no residual axillary disease remains, a completion clearance will be required.

Prognostic index score and clinical prediction model of local regional recurrence after mastectomy in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To develop clinical prediction models for local regional recurrence (LRR) of breast carcinoma after mastectomy that will be superior to the conventional measures of tumor size and nodal status.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical information from 1,010 invasive breast cancer patients who had primary modified radical mastectomy formed the database of the training and testing of clinical prognostic and prediction models of LRR. Cox proportional hazards analysis and Bayesian tree analysis were the core methodologies from which these models were built. To generate a prognostic index model, 15 clinical variables were examined for their impact on LRR. Patients were stratified by lymph node involvement (<4 vs. >or =4) and local regional status (recurrent vs. control) and then, within strata, randomly split into training and test data sets of equal size. To establish prediction tree models, 255 patients were selected by the criteria of having had LRR (53 patients) or no evidence of LRR without postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) (202 patients).

RESULTS

With these models, patients can be divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups on the basis of axillary nodal status, estrogen receptor status, lymphovascular invasion, and age at diagnosis. In the low-risk group, there is no influence of PMRT on either LRR or survival. For intermediate-risk patients, PMRT improves LR control but not metastases-free or overall survival. For the high-risk patients, however, PMRT improves both LR control and metastasis-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic score and predictive index are useful methods to estimate the risk of LRR in breast cancer patients after mastectomy and for estimating the potential benefits of PMRT. These models provide additional information criteria for selection of patients for PMRT, compared with the traditional selection criteria of nodal status and tumor size.

Quantitative molecular diagnosis of axillary drainage fluid for prediction of locoregional failure in patients with one to three positive axillary nodes after mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy

PURPOSE

A quantitative multiple-marker reverse transcriptase (RT)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for sensitive detection of cancer cells in axillary drainage fluid was developed to examine whether the presence of cancer cells in axillary drainage fluid can be used as a predictor of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with breast cancer who had T1/2 primary tumors and one to three positive axillary lymph nodes treated with modified radical mastectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Axillary drainage fluid was collected from 126 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast who were treated with modified radical mastectomy and were found to have one to three positive axillary nodes. Cancer cells in axillary drainage fluid were detected by RT-PCR assay using primers specific for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin-19 (CK-19) together with numerous clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors and were analyzed for their impact on LRR.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients suffered LRR during follow-up and the multimarker RT-PCR assays for CEA and CK-19 in the axillary drainage fluid both were positive in 34 patients (27.0%), of which 29 patients had LRR. In univariate analysis, the 5-year LRR-free survival showed higher rates in patients with PCR-negative findings in axillary drainage fluid (p<0.0001), age>or=40 years old (p<0.0001), tumor size<2.5 cm (p<0.0001), negative lymph-vascular space invasion (p=0.026), and T1 status (<0.0001); in multivariate analysis, PCR-positive findings together with age and tumor size were found to be independent predictors of LRR (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Multiplex RT-PCR assay for CEA and CK-19 was highly sensitive for detection and might be useful for prediction of LRR in such subgroup breast cancer patients.

Cardiovascular effects of radiation therapy: practical approach to radiation therapy-induced heart disease

Radiation induced heart diseases (RIHD) are increasingly recognized as more patients who received radiation therapy survive their diseases with improved management of various malignancies. Radiation affects every component of the heart, ranging from subclinical histopathologic changes to overt clinical disease. Pericardial involvement is the most common and includes asymptomatic pericardial effusion and constrictive pericarditis. The diseases involving the myocardium, valvular apparatus, and conduction system are often subclinical. When symptomatic, they are often the harbinger of more lethal, but treatable, radiation-induced coronary artery disease (CAD). Improvements in the modern radiation delivery systems have minimized irradiation of the heart. However, with increased and emerging indications for radiation therapy for various malignancies in the chest, as a part of bone marrow transplantations, and as the main agent of brachytherapy for advanced preexisting CAD, the incidence of RIHD is likely to increase. Appropriate management of RIHD, either overt or occult, must include understanding the natural history of RIHD, recognition of symptoms by careful history, and vigilant search for treatable causes of the RIHD or other diseases that might mimic RIHD. This article focuses on providing practical yet comprehensive clinical information for general internal medicine and cardiology practices.

The prognostic influence of multifocality in breast cancer patients

The aim of this study was to investigate whether multifocality (MF) is a factor that has significant effect on overall survival when controlling for known prognostic factors. A cohort of 929 breast cancer patients operated between 1985 and 1990 was investigated. Of these, 158 (17%) patients had MF tumors and 771 had unifocal tumors. To investigate whether MF is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in breast cancer, a Cox regression model was applied. Only tumor size, positive lymph nodes, histologic grade and receptor status had a significant effect on overall survival in the multivariate analysis. We found a positive correlation between tumor size and MF and between the number of positive lymph nodes and MF. In conclusion, MF had no significant effect on overall survival besides that which can be explained by other prognostic factors.

Clinical use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy: part II

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is a novel conformal radiotherapy technique which is gaining increasingly widespread use. This second clinical article aims to summarize the published data pertaining to prostate cancer, pelvic irradiation, gynaecological and breast cancer. Prostate cancer patients represent the largest group treated to date. The main indication has been radiation dose escalation within acceptable normal tissue late toxicity. Phase II data are promising, but no randomized clinical trial data are available to support its use. Pelvic IMRT aims to deliver radical radiation doses to pelvic lymph nodes while sparing the bowel and bladder. Indications for breast IMRT data are reviewed, and current data presented. Further data from randomized trials are required to confirm the anticipated benefits of IMRT in patients.

Locoregional recurrence after doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and postmastectomy: Implications for breast cancer patients with early-stage disease and predictors for recurrence after postmastectomy radiation

PURPOSE

To compare rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after mastectomy, doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, and radiation with those of patients receiving mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without radiation and to determine predictors of LRR after postmastectomy radiation.

METHODS

Kaplan-Meier freedom-from-LRR rates were calculated for 470 patients treated with mastectomy, doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, and postmastectomy radiation in five single-institution clinical trials. The LRR rates in these patients were compared to previously reported rates in 1031 patients treated without radiation in the same trials.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 14 years. Irradiated patients had significantly less favorable prognostic factors for LRR than did unirradiated patients. Despite this, in all subsets of node-positive patients, postmastectomy radiation led to lower rates of LRR. This included patients with T1 or T2 tumors and one to three positive nodes (10-year LRR rates of 3% vs. 13%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis of LRR for patients with this stage of disease revealed that no radiation, close/positive margins, gross extracapsular extension, and dissection of <10 nodes predicted for increased LRR (hazard ratios 6.25, 4.61, 3.27, and 2.66, respectively). Significant predictors of LRR for patients treated with postmastectomy radiation were higher number and >or=20% positive nodes, larger tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion, and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease. Recursive partitioning analysis revealed ER-negative status to be the most powerful discriminator of LRR in irradiated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmastectomy radiation decreases LRR for patients with breast cancer, including those with Stage II breast cancer and one to three positive lymph nodes.

Cardiovascular death and second non-breast cancer malignancy after postmastectomy radiation and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of long-term toxicity after postmastectomy radiation and doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Records of 470 patients treated with mastectomy, doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, and postmastectomy radiation in five institutional prospective trials were retrospectively reviewed. Actuarial toxicity rates were compared with those of 1031 patients treated with mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy who did not receive postmastectomy radiation. For those treated with radiation, the chest wall received a median dose of 55 Gy with Co-60 (42%) or electrons (51%). Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of a doxorubicin-based regimen, often followed by 2 years of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10 years. The overall 10-year actuarial rates of RTOG toxicity Grade >1 and >or=3 after radiation were 4% and 2%, respectively. The overall 10- and 15-year actuarial rates of second non-breast cancer malignancy were 3.8% and 7%, respectively. There was no statistical difference between the rates of non-breast cancer second malignancy in the radiated and unirradiated cohorts (3.4% vs. 4.7% 10-year actuarial rates). Increasing age and treatment with >10 cycles of chemotherapy were associated with higher rates of second malignancy (p = 0.025, p = 0.016). The 10-year actuarial rate of death from myocardial infarction (MI) was 2.4% (eight events) and 0.5% (five events) in the radiated and unirradiated groups, respectively (p = 0.058). Of the 8 irradiated patients who died of MI, 2 patients had left-sided breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

We found very low rates of serious sequelae after postmastectomy radiation, including death from myocardial infarction and non-breast cancer second malignancy. The rate of second non-breast cancer malignancy was increased among patients treated with >10 cycles of cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy.

Radiation therapy as an adjuvant treatment after sentinel lymph node surgery for breast cancer

Radiation therapy is an effective treatment of micrometastatic disease involving lymph nodes. Correspondingly, radiation may be an important adjuvant treatment for selected patients who undergo sentinel lymph node surgery. The specific cohorts for whom radiation maybe of benefit include those at risk for a false-negative surgery, patients with a positive sentinel lymph node who elect to forgo an axillary dissection, and patients with drainage to the internal mammary lymph nodes. For these patients, radiation treatment fields must be specifically designed to include the appropriate nodal regions within the target treatment volumes.

Controversies regarding the use of radiation after mastectomy in breast cancer

Despite years of clinical study, there are still many unanswered questions regarding postmastectomy radiation. It is clear that radiation therapy plays a critical role in the multidisciplinary management of patients with locally advanced or inflammatory breast cancer. It is also accepted that postmastectomy radiation is not required for most women with noninvasive disease or stage I disease. Randomized clinical trials studying radiation treatments for women with stage II or III breast cancer have shown that the addition of radiation after mastectomy can reduce local-regional recurrence rates, which then improves survival. However, other data have indicated that the risk of local-regional recurrence after mastectomy and chemotherapy is low for patients with small tumors and one to three positive lymph nodes, leading some to question whether postmastectomy radiation is useful for this group. A second controversy regards the sequencing of postmastectomy radiation and breast reconstruction. In this article we discuss these controversies, review the data that are relevant, and provide our institutional approaches to these issues.

Outcome with Postmastectomy Radiation with Transverse Rectus Abdominis Musculocutaneous Flap Breast Reconstruction

The effects of radiation on the outcome of patients undergoing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction have not been extensively studied. Concern still exists of a possible negative impact secondary to irradiation as related to control of disease, cosmetic outcome, and flap viability. Thirty-six patients underwent both a modified radical mastectomy (MRM) with TRAM flap reconstruction and irradiation to the chest wall to include the TRAM flap and/or regional nodes either before reconstruction or after TRAM flap reconstruction. Fifteen patients had all of their treatment and follow-up at our institution and were retrospectively reviewed to assess treatment and outcome. During a median follow-up of 36 months there were no local-regional failures. One patient at Stage IIIA failed with distant metastases 3 years after treatment. One patient had a flap loss from a nonhealing wound after reconstruction performed 2 years after MRM and radiotherapy. Only one patient expressed dissatisfaction with the cosmetic outcome. Patients undergoing MRM with TRAM flap reconstruction and irradiation before or after reconstruction can achieve excellent local-regional control and satisfactory cosmesis. Risk of flap loss is low. Further follow-up is needed for assessing longer-term outomes in this patient group. Larger prospective studies are necessary for more definitive conclusions.

The sentinel node negative axilla: is it a no-go zone?

The technique of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) presents a great opportunity to reduce the morbidity of surgical treatment of breast cancer. Using either dye, isotope or a combination, after completing a learning process a sensitivity of 80-99% may be achieved. Most surgeons would aim for a sensitivity of 95% but this will mean that 5% of patients will be under-staged, with disease within the axilla and possibly inappropriate advice with regard to adjuvant systemic therapy. Injudicious use of sentinel biopsy will lead to more local relapses and may diminish or neutralize gains from systemic therapy.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy in women with breast cancer metastatic to one to three axillary lymph nodes

The influence of postmastectomy radiotherapy on survival has long been debated. Early randomized trials established a clear role for adjuvant postmastectomy chest wall radiotherapy (PMCWRT) in reducing locoregional recurrence (LRR), and PMCWRT became standard therapy for patients at high risk of LRR: those with T3 or T4 tumors and four or more involved lymph nodes. However, without effective systemic therapy, distant metastases limited any effect of improved local control on overall outcome, and radiotherapy showed no benefit in survival. In fact, early meta-analyses showed a negative impact of radiotherapy on survival. As data and techniques matured, a favorable influence of PMCWRT on breast cancer-specific mortality emerged but was offset by a radiotherapy-related increase in vascular mortality. Improvements in radiotherapy delivery to increase efficacy and reduce toxicity, restriction of PMCWRT to patients at intermediate or high risk of LRR after mastectomy, and improved distant control of disease with systemic therapy are expected to bring the greatest likelihood of a survival advantage from locoregional control. Three randomized trials with sufficient follow-up meet these criteria. All demonstrate significant improvement in overall survival with PMCWRT. However, the trials were not designed to specifically address the benefit of PMCWRT in patients at intermediate risk of LRR (those with T1 or T2 tumors and one to three involved lymph nodes). These findings have been discussed in a host of publications and conferences in light of historical negative results. This review focuses on the recent data on PMCWRT in patients with one to three involved nodes.

Relationship of sentinel and axillary level I-II lymph nodes to tangential fields used in breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the volume of nodal irradiation associated with breast-conserving therapy, we defined the anatomic relationship of sentinel lymph nodes and axillary level I and II lymph nodes in patients receiving tangential breast irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis of 65 simulation fields in women with breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node surgery and 39 women in whom radiopaque clips demarcated the extent of axillary lymph node dissection was performed. We measured the relationship of the surgical clips to the anatomic landmarks and calculated the percentage of prescribed dose delivered to the sentinel lymph node region.

RESULTS

A cranial field edge 2.0 cm below the humeral head the sentinel lymph node region was included or at the field edge in 95% of the cases and the entire extent of axillary I and II dissection in 43% of the axillary dissection cases. In the remaining 57%, this field border encompassed an average of 80% of cranial/caudal extent of axillary level I and II dissection. In 98.5% of the cases, all sentinel lymph nodes were anterior to the deep field edge and 71% were anterior to the chest wall-interface, whereas 61% of the axillary dissection cohort had extension deep to the chest wall-lung interface. If the deep field edge had been set 2 cm below the chest wall-lung interface, the entire axillary dissection would have been included in 82% of the cases, and the entire sentinel lymph node would have been covered with a 0.5-cm margin. The median dose to the sentinel lymph node region was 98% of the prescribed dose.

CONCLUSIONS

By extending the cranial border to 2 cm below the humeral head and 2 cm deep to the chest wall-lung interface, the radiotherapy fields used to treat the breast can include the sentinel lymph node region and most of axillary levels I and II.

Can preoperative lymphoscintigraphy be used as a guide in treatment planning of breast cancer?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to map the lymphatic drainage patterns of breast cancer with lymphoscintigraphy to evaluate the variability of drainage and to determine whether lymphatic mapping can help to increase the certainty of breast cancer staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty women with breast cancer (mean age, 49 years) were included in the study. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed with 1 mCi Tc-99m rhenium sulfide colloid in a 2-ml volume injected into the four quadrants of the peritumoral area using a 25-gauge needle. Ten-minute dynamic images and 2-hour delayed static images were obtained in the anterior and lateral positions using a gamma camera with a high-resolution collimator. All patients had a modified radical mastectomy and axillary dissection. The results were evaluated with histopathologic findings of the axilla.

RESULTS

Six patients had excision biopsies before surgery. Of 13 patients with centrally located tumors, 84% had axillary lymphatic drainage, whereas 53% drained to internal mammary lymphatics. Of 23 patients with outer quadrant tumors, 4 showed no lymphatic drainage and all of them had metastatic tumor in the axillary lymph nodes. Axillary drainage was seen in 82% of patients and internal mammary lymphatic drainage in 23%. Of eight patients with inner quadrant tumors, one patient with no lymphatic drainage was found to have metastases in the axilla. In this group, 62% had axillary and 50% had internal mammary lymphatic drainage, and one patient had supraclavicular drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphoscintigraphy indicates that drainage routes may vary, and thus it may play a guiding role in patients with breast cancer who need radiotherapy. In patients with internal mammary lymphatic drainage, the accuracy of radiotherapy planning may increase if internal mammary lymphoscintigraphy is added to the protocol. In patients with internal mammary drainage, obtaining an internal mammary lymphatic biopsy during surgery will also increase the accuracy of staging.

Does treatment at the time of locoregional failure of breast cancer alter prognosis?

Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after therapy for early breast cancer is common. Patients with LRR can suffer local consequences such as bleeding, ulceration, pain and arm oedema or symptoms of metastases. Unlike existing treatment guidelines for primary tumours, both local (surgical and radiation) and systemic treatment recommendations are less well defined after LRR. The purpose of this review was to assess whether or not treatment at the time of locoregional failure ultimately alters a patient's prognosis. Unfortunately, the data from both retrospective and prospective studies are inconclusive and therefore the treatment of patients with LRR will continue to be recommended using guidelines similar to those for primary breast cancer. Future studies of factors predicting LRR and metastatic spread may allow better prognostication of patients with LRR which may in turn effect both local and systemic treatment decisions.

Locoregionally recurrent breast cancer: incidence, risk factors and survival

Locoregional recurrence (LRR) after therapy for early breast cancer is common. Patients with LRR can suffer both local consequences and symptoms of metastatic disease, as LRR is an independent predictor of subsequent distant metastases. Much of the available data on LRR is derived from small, single institution, retrospective studies, so marked differences in the incidence rates for LRR, it's risk factors and subsequent systemic recurrence are reported. The purpose of this review was to try and collate this data in a format that would be useful for both clinicians and their patients.

The role of radiotherapy in patients undergoing mastectomy for carcinoma of the breast

Several factors, including T stage, nodal involvement, grade, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and possibly involved or close surgical margins, have been found to affect local recurrence after mastectomy. The majority of recurrences will occur in the first 5 years and 50% of patients will have metastatic disease at the time of recurrence. Early studies on the use of adjuvant radiotherapy are difficult to interpret owing to poor radiotherapy techniques, inadequate dose or a variety of confounding variables within a particular trial. More recent reports have confirmed that adjuvant radiotherapy will reduce the risk of local recurrence and in tumours of <5 cm with involved nodes, produce a reduction in breast cancer deaths. Improvements in breast cancer mortality may however be counterbalanced by increases in cardiac events and deaths caused by second malignancies. This stresses the importance of using megavoltage irradiation and avoiding excess cardiac doses particularly when treating left-sided tumours. Adjuvant radiotherapy combined with tamoxifen has been shown to produce an improvement in both local control and survival in postmenopausal node-positive patients who have undergone mastectomy. Adjuvant radiation combined with systemic chemotherapy has a significant effect on local recurrence and probably on survival in node-positive patients after mastectomy. There is little controversy over its role in patients with tumours >5 cm, with more than four nodes involved or with one to three nodes with extracapsular extension, or in those in whom axillary surgery has been deemed inadequate (i.e. <10 nodes). Debate still exists concerning T1/T2, G1/G2 tumours with only one to three nodes involved when the axillary surgery has been satisfactory (>10 nodes). The ongoing Intergroup trial may answer this question but until then other factors such as tumour grade and the presence of lymphovascular invasion can be included in the equation to determine which of the patients in the latter group should receive postoperative radiotherapy. Controversy still exists about what fields should be irradiated and in particular whether the supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary node chain should be included in adjuvant therapy. The EORTC is presently conducting a randomized trial, which should give us the answer. Treatment at relapse on the chest wall may require a combination of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, depending on previous therapy. If radiotherapy has not previously been used, then wide-field irradiation should be administered, including both chest wall and supraclavicular fossa with or without the axilla, depending on the extent of previous axillary surgery and the risk of lymphoedema. Re-irradiation after radical adjuvant radiotherapy can be considered only for selected patients when an adequate discussion with them has taken place with regard to the relative benefits versus toxicity.

CT-targeted irradiation of the breast and internal mammary lymph nodes using a 5-field technique

PURPOSE

To develop an effective and resource-efficient radiotherapy technique to treat the breast and regional nodes, including the ipsilateral internal mammary nodes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighty female patients who underwent MRI scans for a variety of indications had coronal, T1-weighted images of the chest performed to determine the position of the internal mammary chain (IMC). Based on these results, a 5-field treatment technique was developed that would include the breast, supraclavicular fossa, and ipsilateral IMC, while maintaining a low dose to the heart, lungs, and contralateral breast. This technique was implemented in a cohort of 13 patients.

RESULTS

The lateral position of the right and left IMC were measured in three cephalo-caudad positions: at the clavicular heads, upper manubrium, and midsternum (at the 2nd/3rd rib interspace). The mean lateral separation between the right and left IMC chains at each level (and 95% confidence interval) at each level were 5.8 cm (4.67-7.00), 5.6 cm (4.49-6.73), and 5.9 cm (4.66-7.19), respectively. Treatment was delivered to 13 patients using a 5-field technique, with tangential photon fields for the breast, anterior and posterior supraclavicular/axillary field, and a matching anterior electron field. Three-dimensional treatment planning of a representative case confirmed adequate coverage of the planning target volume (PTV). The median dose to the whole heart was 10 Gy, and 20% of the ipsilateral lung received more than 20 Gy. Seven of the 13 patients treated experienced moist desquamation at the junction of the electron field and breast tangents, and 1 patient had persistent ulceration at 3 months' follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The 5-field technique described in this paper provides good coverage to the breast and regional nodes with acceptable toxicity, and without requiring three-dimensional treatment planning or intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques.

Locoregional recurrence patterns after mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: implications for postoperative irradiation

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine locoregional recurrence (LRR) patterns after mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy to define subgroups of patients who might benefit from adjuvant irradiation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1,031 patients were treated with mastectomy and doxorubicin-based chemotherapy without irradiation on five prospective trials. Median follow-up time was 116 months. Rates of isolated and total LRR (+/- distant metastasis) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The 10-year actuarial rates of isolated LRR were 4%, 10%, 21%, and 22% for patients with zero, one to three, four to nine, or >/= 10 involved nodes, respectively (P <.0001). Chest wall (68%) and supraclavicular nodes (41%) were the most common sites of LRR. T stage (P <.001), tumor size (P <.001), and >/= 2-mm extranodal extension (P <.001) were also predictive of LRR. Separate analysis was performed for patients with T1 or T2 primary disease and one to three involved nodes (n = 404). Those with fewer than 10 nodes examined were at increased risk of LRR compared with those with >/= 10 nodes examined (24% v 11%; P =.02). Patients with tumor size greater than 4.0 cm or extranodal extension >/= 2 mm experienced rates of isolated LRR in excess of 20%. Each of these factors continued to significantly predict for LRR in multivariate analysis by Cox logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tumors >/= 4 cm or at least four involved nodes experience LRR rates in excess of 20% and should be offered adjuvant irradiation. Additionally, patients with one to three involved nodes and large tumors, extranodal extension >/= 2 mm, or inadequate axillary dissections experience high rates of LRR and may benefit from postmastectomy irradiation.

Adjuvant sequential chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (ACMF) with concurrent radiotherapy in resectable advanced breast cancer

Doxorubicin (Adriamycin) is an anthracycline effective in breast cancer. Despite a worldwide acceptance of Adriamycin in the adjuvant chemotherapy to maximize the survival benefit in the higher risk patients with breast cancer with promising results, oncologists in general do not favorably consider anthracyclines in the adjuvant treatment setting because of concern about the acute and chronic drug-related toxicity. For high-risk patients with breast cancer with more than three positive axillary lymph nodes, this series adopted a modified sequential regimen of ACMF first with Adriamycin (A) as a single agent in 3-weekly administration for three courses, and then a combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF) every 3 to 4 weeks for six courses given in an outpatient setting concurrent with radiation therapy as an adjuvant treatment. A total of 56 patients underwent modified radical mastectomy and 3 others breast conservation surgery for their invasive breast cancer. Forty-seven (84%) patients completed the intended adjuvant treatment and 1 patient died of infection from treatment-related neutropenia. As a whole, the 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates of 56 patients analyzed were 82.3% and 64.4%, respectively. In this high-risk group, patients with four to nine positive nodes showed a slightly better trend of survival than those with 10 or more positive nodes without reaching statistically significant difference (36-month overall survival: 90.9% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.06; disease-free survival: 78.7% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.38). In this entire group of patients, locoregional recurrence was absent. A total of 55 episodes of grade III and IV hematologic toxicity were observed, with only one death from neutropenic sepsis. This modified ACMF regimen offers a good survival rate in breast cancer patients with more than three positive axillary lymph nodes. When these patients are carefully managed, the morbidity and mortality related to the treatment are low.

Does locoregional radiation therapy improve survival in breast cancer? A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Recent randomized trials in women with node-positive breast cancer who received systemic treatment report that locoregional radiation therapy improves survival. Previous trials failed to detect a difference in survival that results from its use. A systematic review of randomized trials that examine the effectiveness of locoregional radiation therapy in patients treated by definitive surgery and adjuvant systemic therapy was conducted.

METHODS

Randomized trials published between 1967 and 1999 were identified through MEDLINE database, CancerLit database, and reference lists of relevant articles. Relevant data was abstracted. The results of randomized trials were pooled using meta-analyses to estimate the effect of treatment on any recurrence, locoregional recurrence, and mortality.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials that involved a total of 6,367 patients were identified. Most trials included both pre- and postmenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer treated with modified radical mastectomy. The type of systemic therapy received, sites irradiated, techniques used, and doses of radiation delivered varied between trials. Data on toxicity were infrequently reported. Radiation was shown to reduce the risk of any recurrence (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.83), local recurrence (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.34), and mortality (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.94).

CONCLUSION

Locoregional radiation after surgery in patients treated with systemic therapy reduced mortality. Several questions remain on how these results should be translated into current-day clinical practice.

Radiotherapy following mastectomy: indication and contraindication of chest wall irradiation

PURPOSE

To determine in which cases radiotherapy of the chest wall following mastectomy is indicated, based on the local recurrent rate in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1984 until 1994, 105 patients who had four or more histopathologically confirmed axillary nodes metastases, or T3-4Nany, were subjected to mastectomy and were administered radiotherapy postoperatively using the hockey-stick field, which included the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary nodes, except the chest wall. Median age was 51 years old (range, 23 to 82 years old). Eighty-five patients underwent radical mastectomy, 18 modified radical mastectomy, and 2 extended radical mastectomy. Fraction size was 2 Gy/day, the weekly fraction size was 10 Gy and the total dose ranged from 44 Gy to 54 Gy (median 50 Gy). Seventy-four patients were administered adjuvant chemotherapy, and 61 patients were administered hormone therapy.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival rates of the whole study population were 66%. The 5-year chest wall recurrence rates were 10%. The 5-year chest wall recurrence rates of the patients who had no vascular invasion (n = 19) and the patients who had definite vascular invasion (n = 38) were 0% and 24%, respectively (p = 0.036). All the patients who presented chest wall recurrence had four or more axillary nodes metastases. Nine of the 10 patients who presented chest wall recurrence had definite vascular invasion, while there was no information about vascular invasion for the remaining patient. Factors such as age, pathological subtypes, tumor location, estrogen receptors, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy did not influence the development of chest wall recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with breast cancer who have four or more positive axillary nodes or T3-4Nany, those who have no vascular invasion or less than 4 axillary nodes metastases do not need to be subjected to chest wall irradiation after radical mastectomy.

Postmastectomy radiation in patients with one to three positive axillary nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: An unresolved issue

The rationale for postmastectomy radiation is based on the prevention of locoregional recurrence in the chest wall, regional lymphatics, or both. The randomized trials of postmastectomy radiation in patients with one to three positive nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy have shown a proportional reduction in locoregional recurrence rates of two thirds. The absolute benefit, however, varies with the magnitude of the risk in patients who do not receive radiation. The survival benefit from radiation is best explained by the prevention of an isolated locoregional recurrence, which could serve as a source of fatal distant metastases and parallels the difference in the total incidence of distant metastases. The current dilemma is to identify patients with one to three positive nodes who have had an adequate axillary dissection and remain at substantial risk for a locoregional recurrence despite adjuvant chemotherapy. The routine use of postmastectomy radiation in all axillary node-positive patients requires further evaluation.

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of postmastectomy radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of postmastectomy local-regional radiation therapy (RT) for patients with breast cancer with regard to local-regional relapse (LRR) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from the literature are used to estimate the risk of LRR, and the impact of RT on the risk of LRR and survival. The risk of LRR is related linearly to the number of positive axillary nodes 1% rate of LRR = 10 + (4 x number of positive nodes)]. RT reduces the risk of LRR by 67%. LRRs are treated with excision or biopsy followed by RT; half being controlled locally and half receiving additional salvage surgery and chemotherapy. Absolute improvements in 10-year overall survival due to RT are assumed to vary between 1 and 12%; and accrue linearly during the initial 10-year follow-up period. Professional and technical charges are used as a surrogate for costs. Money spent and benefits recognized in future years are discounted to 1997 values using a 3% annual rate. Quality factors are used to adjust for treatment, disease, and toxicity status.

RESULTS

The cost per LRR prevented with the addition of routine postmastectomy RT is highly dependent upon the number of positive axillary nodes and ranges from $100,000-$200,000 for patients with 0-2 nodes, and $25,000-$75,000 for > or = 4 nodes. The cost per QALY gained at 10 years is $10,000-$110,000 for survival benefits > or = 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost per LRR prevented decreases with increasing numbers of positive axillary nodes. There is not a sharp cutoff at the < or = 3 vs. > or = 4 lymph node number, suggesting that using this cutoff for recommending or not recommending RT following mastectomy is not economically logical. The cost per QALY of $10,000-$100,000 compares favorably to that of other accepted medical procedures. Modest changes in the quantitative assumptions do not qualitatively alter the results. Concerns regarding costs should not generally preclude the use of postmastectomy RT.

Impact of clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors on outcome in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with multimodality therapy

The authors reviewed the experience at their institution treating patients with locally advanced breast cancer using multimodality therapy to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors affecting outcome. One hundred patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated with definitive therapy at William Beaumont Hospital. Three patients had stage IIB disease, 45 patients had stage IIIA disease, and 52 patients had IIIB disease. Thirteen patients had inflammatory breast carcinoma. Seventy-four patients (74%) received trimodality therapy consisting of systemic therapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. Systemic therapy was delivered to 90 patients. Eighty-three patients (83%) received adjuvant radiation therapy. Eighty-five patients underwent mastectomy (85%). Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for their impact on outcome. The median follow-up was 47 months. Overall, the 5-year actuarial rates of local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and cause-specific survival were 81%, 43%, 53%, and 55%, respectively. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival rates for patients with inflammatory breast carcinoma, stage IIIA disease, and stage IIIB disease were 25%, 55%, and 53%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, local control was improved with radiation therapy (p = 0.008) and the absence of inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.008). Disease-free survival was improved with the addition of radiation therapy (p = 0.001) and with less than four positive lymph nodes (p = 0.003). Distant metastasis-free survival was improved in patients without inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.0249) and with less than four involved lymph nodes (p = 0.0135). Cause-specific survival and overall survival were adversely affected by the presence of inflammatory breast carcinoma (p = 0.0135 and p = 0.0325, respectively) or four or more involved lymph nodes (p = 0.0082 and p = 0.012, respectively). Radiation therapy appears to be a critical component in the overall treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer by improving the rates of local control and disease-free survival. Other adverse factors for survival include four or more positive lymph nodes and inflammatory breast carcinoma.

Evaluation of predictive factors for local tumour control after electron-beam-rotation irradiation of the chest wall in locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Different radiotherapy techniques are being used for chest wall irradiation after mastectomy. We review our results with the electron-beam-rotation technique in a series of 130 high risk breast cancer patients. The main end point of the study was local tumour control; secondary end points were disease free survival, and overall survival, as well as acute and late side effects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 1990 to June 1995, 89 patients underwent electron-beam-rotation irradiation of the chest wall after primary mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection (group I) and 41 patients after excision of local recurrent breast cancer (group II) with 4 x 2.5 Gy/week to 50 Gy total dose (4-12 MeV electrons depending on the thickness of the chest wall). In addition, irradiation of local-regional lymph nodes and/or a local boost of 10 Gy were applied dependent on the resection and node status.

RESULTS

After a median follow up of 29 months (65% stadium III/IV) the 3 year local tumour control, disease free survival, and overall survival were 73%, 47%, and 75%, respectively. Local control in group I was 78% versus 60% in group II. Significant predictors for local tumour control, disease free survival, and overall survival were resection status (R0 versus R1/2) and estrogen receptor status (positive versus negative). In group I, tumour grading (GI-IIa versus GIIb-III) and estrogen receptor status were found to be additional significant prognostic factors for complete resected tumours. Five patients developed symptomatic pneumonitis (< 4%) and one patient developed a chronic fistula at the resection. A significant correlation between the degree of acute skin reaction and persistent pigmentation was observed.

CONCLUSION

In high risk breast cancer patients postoperative irradiation with the electron-beam-rotation technique of the chest wall is an effective therapy resulting in 78% local tumour control at 3 years for locally advanced breast cancer and 60% for recurrent disease. The rate of acute and late toxicity is low. The degree of acute skin reaction correlates with the degree of persistent pigmentation.

The impact of prophylactic axillary node dissection on breast cancer survival--a Bayesian meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Because of the general acceptance of the NSABP B-04 study, prophylactic axillary node dissection for women with clinically negative axillae is considered diagnostic, but not therapeutic, by many oncologists. Nevertheless, several authors have shown that B-04 did not include enough patients to exclude a small survival advantage.

METHODS

A Bayesian meta-analysis of the available literature was performed comparing standard treatment to standard treatment without axillary node dissection. Six randomized controlled trials were identified, consisting of nearly 3000 patients and spanning four decades.

RESULTS

All six trials showed that prophylactic axillary node dissection improved survival, ranging from 4% to 16%, corresponding to a risk reduction of 7%-46%. Combining the six trials showed an average survival benefit of 5.4% (95% CI = 2.7-8.0%, probability of survival benefit > 99.5%). Adjusting for biases in the individual studies did not alter the conclusions, nor did subset analysis of Stage I patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary node dissection improves survival in women with operable breast cancer. Nevertheless, two important limitations of this analysis are noteworthy. Few of the patients in the six trials had T1a tumors, so extrapolation of these results to this subset (and those with nonpalpable tumors) may be inappropriate. Essentially no patients in the six trials were treated with adjuvant therapy, as contrasted to current clinical practice. It is possible that the risk reduction seen in this meta-analysis may be diminished in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite these limitations, this study suggests that axillary dissection should be performed in most women with palpable tumors for diagnostic, as well as therapeutic, purposes.

Radiation tolerance of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous-free flaps used in immediate breast reconstruction

The authors determine the effects of postoperative radiation therapy on flap and local control outcomes in patients who have undergone immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM)-free flap reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. Details of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy for 21 patients who had undergone immediate TRAM-free flap reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy were gathered retrospectively. The outcomes examined were flap complications, overall cosmesis, and local recurrence rate. Radiation therapy was indicated for large primary tumors (T3-T4), close or positive margins, or extensive nodal disease. With a mean follow-up interval of 19 months, there have been no flap complications or losses. Cosmesis was rated as excellent by 60% of patients, good by 30%, and fair by the remaining 10%. Three patients thought that radiation had improved cosmesis, one noted worse cosmesis, and the remainder thought it had no effect on cosmesis. The local control rate was 86%. Postreconstruction irradiation of TRAM-free flaps used in immediate reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer appears safe and cosmetically acceptable.

[Limitations and perspectives of postoperative radiotherapy in bronchial cancer]

The role of postoperative irradiation for lung cancer remains a controversial issue. The available data suggest a reduction in local relapse in cases of positive mediastinal lymph node, but how this benefit translates into survival is not known. The current indications include tumors with positive mediastinal lymph node and incomplete resection with micro- or macroscopical residue. Nevertheless, postoperative irradiation requires a meticulous technique to avoid inducing life-threatening complications to vital organs such as the heart or the lung.

Use of Modern Radiation Therapy Following Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer

Radiation therapy has long been used in the treatment of breast cancer. However, it is still very difficult to state with certainty whether or not radiation therapy is truly beneficial for patients with breast cancer, mainly because breast cancers are very heterogeneous in their clinical behavior, and because radiation therapy has undergone significant change in the methodology. We extensively reviewed the literature, and determined that radiation therapy increases the survival of some patients, particularly in conjunction with surgery and systemic therapy. Although the total proportion of such patients seems to be small, appliedto the general population of breast cancer patients, the absolute number of women who might benefit from radiation therapy may be quite large.

Frequent dose delays and growth factor requirements with the sequential doxorubicin-CMF schedule

Doxorubicin for four cycles plus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) for eight cycles is an effective adjuvant regimen for breast cancer patients with more than three involved axillary lymph nodes. We reviewed the incidence of dose delays and growth factor requirements when this regimen is administered to patients receiving concurrent irradiation. Thirty-six patients with more than three involved axillary lymph nodes were treated with the sequential regimen doxorubicin-CMF and irradiation. Patients with two or more dose delays received G-CSF treatment. Seventy-five percent of the patients required dose delays for day-22 neutropenia, and growth factors were needed for half of the patients in order to maintain a received dose intensity of 0.940. The first delayed cycle occurred in 74% of the patients while receiving concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Frequent dose delays were required when the sequential regimen doxorubicin-CMF was administered along with radiotherapy. Growth factors are needed to maintain dose intensity similar to that achieved in the original trial.

The benefit and risk of postmastectomy radiation therapy in patients with high-risk breast cancer

To evaluate the efficacy of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for prophylaxis against locoregional recurrence in high-risk breast cancer patients, and the rate of complication associated with such treatment, we retrospectively reviewed 79 breast cancers in 78 patients, who were given therapy (PMRT) between April 1990 and March 1995. Radiation doses were 46-50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. High-risk factors included primary tumor (> or = 5 cm) in 19 (24.1%) patients, positive axillary lymph nodes (> or = 4) in 56 (70.9%) patients, positive or close (< or = 2 mm) surgical margins in 14 (17.7%) patients, and central or inner quadrant tumor with positive axillary nodes and lymphovascular invasion in seven (8.9%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was also given to 69 of 78 (88.5%), patients and hormonal therapy to 41 of 78 (53.7%) patients. The median follow-up time was 25 months (range, 7-66 months) after mastectomy. Our study revealed that locoregional failure as the first site of failure occurred in only one of 78 (1.3%) patients. Relapse-free survival at 3 years was 67.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 52.0-81.3], and overall survival was 76.9% (95% CI, 63.3-90.6). The incidence of radiological evidence of lung fibrosis increased significantly in patients whose internal mammary chain was included in the radiation field. The occurrence of lung fibrosis can be reduced by changing radiation treatment technique and keeping central lung distance (CLD) of tangential field to < or = 2.8 cm in tangential field technique or < or = 1.4 cm in tangential with a separate internal mammary field technique. We concluded that the risk of locoregional recurrence in high-risk breast cancer patients can be much reduced by PMRT. With careful selection of radiation treatment fields, radiotherapy technique, and limitation of CLD to < or = 2.8 cm in tangential technique or < or = 1.4 cm in separate technique, the risk of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis is minimal. PMRT should be recommended for breast cancer patients who are at high risk for locoregional recurrence.

How should we introduce high-dose chemotherapeutic strategies into the adjuvant management of high-risk breast cancer in Australasia?

BACKGROUND

Development of bone marrow support techniques has altered the standard chemotherapeutic management of haematological malignancies, and these techniques are now being increasingly utilized in solid tumours. In breast cancer, survival benefits have resulted from conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy, but outcomes remain poor in many women with high-risk disease. Improved response rates with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) in metastatic disease have led to the investigation of these techniques in adjuvant therapy of high-risk localized disease. In some high-risk patient subgroups survival is extremely poor, with 5-year rates below 30%. Improved adjuvant strategies for patients in these subgroups are therefore urgently required. In Australasia, oncology departments are currently considering accrual of women with high-risk disease into the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) 15-95 Trial investigating HDC/stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

The present paper reviews the available data on the efficacies and toxicities of currently available high-dose chemotherapeutic strategies; discussing methodological considerations relevant to their introduction and safe use in the adjuvant setting in Australia and New Zealand.

RESULTS

Although response rates with HDC in metastatic disease are encouraging, the clinical effectiveness of current HDC regimens in adjuvant management has not been established and is limited by significant toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of HDC strategies for high-risk breast cancer in Australia encounters difficulties both in trial design and potential clinical practice.

Loco-regional recurrence following mastectomy for early breast carcinoma: efficacy of radiotherapy at the time of recurrence

This study aims to define the risk factors for loco-regional relapse following mastectomy, and to assess the efficacy of radiotherapy at the time of relapse. To achieve this 272 patients with loco-regional relapse treated at a single institution with modified radical or radical mastectomy were reviewed. Tumour size, axillary node involvement and tumour grade were found to be significant risk factors for loco-regional recurrence of disease. Radiotherapy given at the time of relapse controlled disease in 61% of cases, compared with 34% of patients treated with systemic treatment only. Altogether, 146 (54%) of the 269 evaluable patients with local failure had uncontrolled disease at the same site, either at the time of death or at the date last seen. The result of this retrospective study showed that delayed radiotherapy was effective in controlling the disease in patients with developing loco-regional relapses. However, as adjuvant radiotherapy reduces the incidence of local disease recurrence it should be recommended to patients considered to be at high risk of local relapse following mastectomy; namely those with tumours bigger than 5 cm with four or more positive axillary nodes.