Two or six hyperthermia treatments as an adjunct to radiation therapy yield similar tumor responses: results of a randomized trial

The Rationale for Combining Hypofractionated Radiation and Hyperthermia

The conventional radiation treatment of cancer patients has typically involved a large number of daily treatments with relatively low doses of radiation. However, improved technology has now resulted in the increased use of fewer radiation fractions at a high dose per fraction. This latter approach is often referred to as hypofractionated irradiation. While conventional radiation typically kills tumor cells through the production of DNA damage, treatments with higher doses per fraction have been suggested to also kill cells via the induction of vascular damage. Such vascular effects will also increase the level of adverse microenvironmental conditions, such as hypoxia and acidity, that already exist in tumors. Cells existing in these adverse microenvironmental conditions are resistant to radiation but actually sensitive to hyperthermia (heating at 40-45 °C) treatment. This suggests that the combination of hypofractionated radiation and heat may be a viable treatment approach. While there are preliminary pre-clinical and even clinical studies investigating this option, there are actually no data on the optimal application for the greatest therapeutic benefit. In this critical review, we will present the rationale for combining hypofractionated radiation with hyperthermia and discuss what has been done and what should be done to establish this combination as an effective cancer therapy option.

Augmentation of the EPR effect by mild hyperthermia to improve nanoparticle delivery to the tumor

The clinical translation of the nanoparticle (NP)-based anticancer therapies is still unsatisfactory due to the heterogeneity of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Despite the promising preclinical outcome of the pharmacological EPR enhancers, their systemic toxicity can limit their clinical application. Hyperthermia (HT) presents an efficient tool to augment the EPR by improving tumor blood flow (TBF) and vascular permeability, lowering interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), and disrupting the structure of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Furthermore, the HT-triggered intravascular release approach can overcome the EPR effect. In contrast to pharmacological approaches, HT is safe and can be focused to cancer tissues. Moreover, HT conveys direct anti-cancer effects, which improve the efficacy of the anti-cancer agents encapsulated in NPs. However, the clinical application of HT is challenging due to the heterogeneous distribution of temperature within the tumor, the length of the treatment and the complexity of monitoring.

Avoiding Pitfalls in Thermal Dose Effect Relationship Studies: A Review and Guide Forward

The challenge to explain the diffuse and unconclusive message reported by hyperthermia studies investigating the thermal dose parameter is still to be unravelled. In the present review, we investigated a wide range of technical and clinical parameters characterising hyperthermia treatment to better understand and improve the probability of detecting a thermal dose effect relationship in clinical studies. We performed a systematic literature review to obtain hyperthermia clinical studies investigating the associations of temperature and thermal dose parameters with treatment outcome or acute toxicity. Different hyperthermia characteristics were retrieved, and their influence on temperature and thermal dose parameters was assessed. In the literature, we found forty-eight articles investigating thermal dose effect relationships. These comprised a total of 4107 patients with different tumour pathologies. The association between thermal dose and treatment outcome was the investigated endpoint in 90% of the articles, while the correlation between thermal dose and toxicity was investigated in 50% of the articles. Significant associations between temperature-related parameters and treatment outcome were reported in 63% of the studies, while those between temperature-related parameters and toxicity were reported in 15% of the studies. One clear difficulty for advancement is that studies often omitted fundamental information regarding the clinical treatment, and among the different characteristics investigated, thermometry details were seldom and divergently reported. To overcome this, we propose a clear definition of the terms and characteristics that should be reported in clinical hyperthermia treatments. A consistent report of data will allow their use to further continue the quest for thermal dose effect relationships.

Clinical Evidence for Thermometric Parameters to Guide Hyperthermia Treatment

Hyperthermia (HT) is a cancer treatment modality which targets malignant tissues by heating to 40-43 °C. In addition to its direct antitumor effects, HT potently sensitizes the tumor to radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT), thereby enabling complete eradication of some tumor entities as shown in randomized clinical trials. Despite the proven efficacy of HT in combination with classic cancer treatments, there are limited international standards for the delivery of HT in the clinical setting. Consequently, there is a large variability in reported data on thermometric parameters, including the temperature obtained from multiple reference points, heating duration, thermal dose, time interval, and sequence between HT and other treatment modalities. Evidence from some clinical trials indicates that thermal dose, which correlates with heating time and temperature achieved, could be used as a predictive marker for treatment efficacy in future studies. Similarly, other thermometric parameters when chosen optimally are associated with increased antitumor efficacy. This review summarizes the existing clinical evidence for the prognostic and predictive role of the most important thermometric parameters to guide the combined treatment of RT and CT with HT. In conclusion, we call for the standardization of thermometric parameters and stress the importance for their validation in future prospective clinical studies.

Targeting Hypoxia: Revival of Old Remedies

Tumour hypoxia is significantly correlated with patient survival and treatment outcomes. At the molecular level, hypoxia is a major driving factor for tumour progression and aggressiveness. Despite the accumulative scientific and clinical efforts to target hypoxia, there is still a need to find specific treatments for tumour hypoxia. In this review, we discuss a variety of approaches to alter the low oxygen tumour microenvironment or hypoxia pathways including carbogen breathing, hyperthermia, hypoxia-activated prodrugs, tumour metabolism and hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibitors. The recent advances in technology and biological understanding reveal the importance of revisiting old therapeutic regimens and repurposing their uses clinically.

Targetability of cervical cancer by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)-mediated hyperthermia (HT) for patients receiving radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the targetability of late-stage cervical cancer by magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU)-induced hyperthermia (HT) as an adjuvant to radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

Seventy-nine cervical cancer patients (stage IIIB-IVA) who received RT with lesions visible on positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) were retrospectively analyzed for targetability using a commercially-available HT-capable MRgHIFU system. Targetability was assessed for both primary targets and/or any metastatic lymph nodes using both posterior (supine) and anterior (prone) patient setups relative to the transducer. Thirty-four different angles of rotation along subjects' longitudinal axis were analyzed. Targetability was categorized as: (1) Targetable with/without minimal intervention; (2) Not targetable. To determine if any factors could be used for prospective screening of patients, potential associations between demographic/anatomical factors and targetability were analyzed.

RESULTS

72.15% primary tumors and 33.96% metastatic lymph nodes were targetable from at least one angle. 49.37% and 39.24% of primary tumors could be targeted with patient laying in supine and prone positions, respectively. 25°-30° rotation and 0° rotation had the highest rate of the posterior and anterior targetability, respectively. The ventral depth of the tumor and its distance to the coccyx were statistically correlated with the anterior and posterior targetability, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Most late-stage cervical cancer primaries were targetable by MRgHIFU HT requiring either no/minimal intervention. A rotation of 0° or 25°-30° relative to the transducer might benefit anterior and posterior targetability, respectively. Certain demographic/anatomic parameters might be useful in screening patients for treatability.

Focused ultrasound radiosensitizes human cancer cells by enhancement of DNA damage

Purpose

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU/FUS) has expanded as a noninvasive quantifiable option for hyperthermia (HT). HT in a temperature range of 40–47 °C (thermal dose CEM43 ≥ 25) could work as a sensitizer to radiation therapy (RT). Here, we attempted to understand the tumor radiosensitization effect at the cellular level after a combination treatment of FUS+RT.

Methods

An in vitro FUS system was developed to induce HT at frequencies of 1.147 and 1.467 MHz. Human head and neck cancer (FaDU), glioblastoma (T98G), and prostate cancer (PC-3) cells were exposed to FUS in ultrasound-penetrable 96-well plates followed by single-dose X‑ray irradiation (10 Gy). Radiosensitizing effects of FUS were investigated by cell metabolic activity (WST‑1 assay), apoptosis (annexin V assay, sub-G1 assay), cell cycle phases (propidium iodide staining), and DNA double-strand breaks (γH2A.X assay).

Results

The FUS intensities of 213 (1.147 MHz) and 225 W/cm² (1.467 MHz) induced HT for 30 min at mean temperatures of 45.20 ± 2.29 °C (CEM43 = 436 ± 88) and 45.59 ± 1.65 °C (CEM43 = 447 ± 79), respectively. FUS improves the effect of RT significantly by reducing metabolic activity in T98G cells 48 h (RT: 96.47 ± 8.29%; FUS+RT: 79.38 ± 14.93%; p = 0.012) and in PC-3 cells 72 h (54.20 ± 10.85%; 41.01 ± 11.17%; p = 0.016) after therapy, but not in FaDu cells. Mechanistically, FUS+RT leads to increased apoptosis and enhancement of DNA double-strand breaks compared to RT alone in T98G and PC-3 cells.

Conclusion

Our in vitro findings demonstrate that FUS has good potential to sensitize glioblastoma and prostate cancer cells to RT by mainly enhancing DNA damage.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-021-01774-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ultrasound Hyperthermia Technology for Radiosensitization

Hyperthermia therapy (HT) raises tissue temperature to 40-45°C for up to 60 min. Hyperthermia is one of the most potent sensitizers of radiation therapy (RT). Ultrasound-mediated HT for radiosensitization has been used clinically since the 1960s. Recently, magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU), which has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for thermal ablation therapy, has been adapted for HT. With emerging clinical trials using MRgHIFU HT for radiosensitization, there is a pressing need to review the ultrasound HT technology. The objective of this review is to overview existing HT technology, summarize available ultrasound HT devices, evaluate clinical studies combining ultrasound HT with RT and discuss challenges and future directions.

Temperature and thermal dose during radiotherapy and hyperthermia for recurrent breast cancer are related to clinical outcome and thermal toxicity: a systematic review

Objective: Hyperthermia therapy (HT), heating tumors to 40-45 °C, is a known radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy sensitizer. The additional benefit of HT to RT for recurrent breast cancer has been proven in multiple randomized trials. However, published outcome after RT + HT varies widely. We performed a systematic review to investigate whether there is a relationship between achieved HT dose and clinical outcome and thermal toxicity for patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Method: Four databases, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov, were searched with the terms breast, radiotherapy, hyperthermia therapy and their synonyms. Final search was performed on 3 April 2019. Twenty-two articles were included in the systematic review, reporting on 2330 patients with breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Results: Thirty-two HT parameters were tested for a relationship with clinical outcome. In studies reporting a relationship, the relationship was significant for complete response in 10/15 studies, in 10/13 studies for duration of local control, in 2/2 studies for overall survival and in 7/11 studies for thermal toxicity. Patients who received high thermal dose had on average 34% (range 27%-53%) more complete responses than patients who received low thermal dose. Patients who achieved higher HT parameters had increased odds/probability on improved clinical outcome and on thermal toxicity. Conclusion: Temperature and thermal dose during HT had significant influence on complete response, duration of local control, overall survival and thermal toxicity of patients with recurrent breast cancer treated with RT + HT. Higher temperature and thermal dose improved outcome, while higher maximum temperature increased incidence of thermal toxicity.

Reirradiation and hyperthermia for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area: Size matters

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Treatment options for irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area are limited. Hyperthermia, elevating tumor temperature to 40-45°C, sensitizes radio-and-chemotherapy. Four hundred and fourteen patients treated with reirradiation+hyperthermia (reRT+HT) in the AMC(n=301) and the BVI(n=113), from 1982 to 2005 were retrospectively analyzed for treatment response, locoregional control (LC) and prognostic factors for LC and toxicity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

All patients received previous irradiation (median 50 Gy). reRT consisted of 8 × 4 Gy-2/week (AMC) or 12 × 3 Gy-4/week (BVI). Hyperthermia was added once (AMC)/twice (BVI) a week.

RESULTS

Overall clinical response rate was 86%. The 3-year LC rate was 25%. The number of recurrence episodes, distant metastases (DM), tumor site, tumor size, time to recurrence and treatment year were significant for LC. Acute ⩾ grade 3 toxicity occurred in 24% of patients. Actuarial late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity was 23% at 3-years. In multivariable analysis reRT fraction dose was significantly related to late ⩾ grade 3 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

reRT+HT is an effective curative and palliative treatment option for patients with irresectable locoregional recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area. Early referral, treatment of chest wall recurrences ⩽ 5 cm in the absence of distant metastases, provided the highest local control rates. The cumulative effects of past and present treatments should be accounted for by adjusting treatment protocol to minimize toxicity.

Conventional cancer treatment alone or with regional hyperthermia for pain relief in lung cancer: A case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of combining conventional treatment with regional hyperthermia on cancer pain in lung cancer patients.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

One Korean university hospital and three complementary cancer clinics.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Main outcome was effective analgesic score (EAS, PI[1+(M/10)], 1: anti-inflammatory drug consumption at a regular dosage, M: weekly dose (mg) of oral morphine equivalent and PI: pain intensity) at four time points (baseline (days -30 to 0), time 1 (days 1-60), time 2 (days 61-120), and time 3 (days 121-180)). Propensity score matching between the hyperthermia and control groups was performed using a 1:5 ratio. A linear mixed effects model was employed to measure EAS changes over time in the two groups.

RESULTS

At baseline, there were 83 subjects in the control group and 32 subjects in the hyperthermia group. At time 3, there were 49 subjects in the control group and 16 subjects in the hyperthermia group. Analyses showed rate of change of EAS, treatment×time was significant (p=0.038). This significant difference was mainly observed for time 1 (mean difference: 101.76 points, 95% confidence interval: 10.20-193.32 points, p=0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate an increase in cancer pain in lung cancer patients administered regional hyperthermia, particularly during the early stage of hyperthermia treatment.

Hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy for superficial breast cancer and chest wall recurrence: a review of the randomised data

Hyperthermia has long been used in combination with radiation for the treatment of superficial malignancies, in part due to its radiosensitising capabilities. Patients who suffer superficial recurrences of breast cancer, be it in their chest wall following mastectomy, or in their breast after breast conservation, typically have poor clinical outcomes. They often develop distant metastatic disease, but one must not overlook the problems associated with an uncontrolled local failure. Morbidity is enormous, and can significantly impair quality of life. There is no accepted standard of care in treating superficial recurrences of breast cancer, particularly in patients that have previously been irradiated. There is a substantial literature regarding the combined use of hyperthermia and radiotherapy for these superficial recurrences. Most of it is retrospective in nature, but there are several larger phase III randomised trials that show an improved rate of clinical complete response in patients treated with both modalities. In this review article, we will highlight the important prospective data that has been published regarding the combined use of hyperthermia and radiation.

Re-setting the biologic rationale for thermal therapy

This review takes a retrospective look at how hyperthermia biology, as defined from studies emerging from the late 1970s and into the 1980s, mis-directed the clinical field of hyperthermia, by placing too much emphasis on the necessity of killing cells with hyperthermia in order to define success. The requirement that cell killing be achieved led to sub-optimal hyperthermia fractionation goals for combinations with radiotherapy, inappropriate sequencing between radiation and hyperthermia and goals for hyperthermia equipment performance that were neither achievable nor necessary. The review then considers the importance of the biologic effects of hyperthermia that occur in the temperature range that lies between that necessary to kill substantial proportions of cells and normothermia (e.g. 39-42 degrees C for 1 h). The effects that occur in this temperature range are compelling-including inhibition of radiation-induced damage repair, changes in perfusion, re-oxygenation, effects on macromolecular and nanoparticle delivery, induction of the heat shock response and immunological stimulation, all of which can be exploited to improve tumour response to radiation and chemotherapy. This new knowledge about the biology of hyperthermia compels one to continue to move the field forward, but with thermal goals that are eminently achievable and tolerable by patients. The fact that lower temperatures are incorporated into thermal goals does not lessen the need for non-invasive thermometry or more sophisticated hyperthermia delivery systems, however. If anything, it further compels one to move the field forward on an integrated biological, engineering and clinical level.

Randomized trial of hyperthermia and radiation for superficial tumors

PURPOSE

Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated hyperthermia (HT) enhances radiation response. These trials, however, generally lacked rigorous thermal dose prescription and administration. We report the final results of a prospective randomized trial of superficial tumors (</= 3 cm depth) comparing radiotherapy versus HT combined with radiotherapy, using the parameter describing the number of cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C exceeded by 90% of monitored points within the tumor (CEM 43 degrees C T(90)) as a measure of thermal dose.

METHODS

This trial was designed to test whether a thermal dose of more than 10 CEM 43 degrees C T(90) results in improved complete response and duration of local control compared with a thermal dose of </= 1 CEM 43 degrees C T(90). Patients received a test dose of HT </= 1 CEM 43 degrees C T(90) and tumors deemed heatable were randomly assigned to additional HT versus no additional HT. HT was given using microwave spiral strip applicators operating at 433 MHz.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients were enrolled; 109 (89%) were deemed heatable and were randomly assigned. The complete response rate was 66.1% in the HT arm and 42.3% in the no-HT arm. The odds ratio for complete response was 2.7 (95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8; P = .02). Previously irradiated patients had the greatest incremental gain in complete response: 23.5% in the no-HT arm versus 68.2% in the HT arm. No overall survival benefit was seen.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant hyperthermia with a thermal dose more than 10 CEM 43 degrees C T(90) confers a significant local control benefit in patients with superficial tumors receiving radiation therapy.

Hyperthermia in combined treatment of cancer

Hyperthermia, the procedure of raising the temperature of tumour-loaded tissue to 40-43 degrees C, is applied as an adjunctive therapy with various established cancer treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The potential to control power distributions in vivo has been significantly improved lately by the development of planning systems and other modelling tools. This increased understanding has led to the design of multiantenna applicators (including their transforming networks) and implementation of systems for monitoring of E-fields (eg, electro-optical sensors) and temperature (particularly, on-line magnetic resonance tomography). Several phase III trials comparing radiotherapy alone or with hyperthermia have shown a beneficial effect of hyperthermia (with existing standard equipment) in terms of local control (eg, recurrent breast cancer and malignant melanoma) and survival (eg, head and neck lymph-node metastases, glioblastoma, cervical carcinoma). Therefore, further development of existing technology and elucidation of molecular mechanisms are justified. In recent molecular and biological investigations there have been novel applications such as gene therapy or immunotherapy (vaccination) with temperature acting as an enhancer, to trigger or to switch mechanisms on and off. However, for every particular temperature-dependent interaction exploited for clinical purposes, sophisticated control of temperature, spatially as well as temporally, in deep body regions will further improve the potential.

Use of whole body hyperthermia as a method to heat inaccessible tumours uniformly: a phase III trial in canine brain masses

In this study, whole body hyperthermia (WBH) was assessed as a means of heating intracranial tumours uniformly. Twenty-five dogs received radiation therapy and 20 the combination of radiation and WBH. Total radiation dose was randomly assigned and was either 44, 48, 52, 56 or 60 Gy. Because of WBH toxicity, intercurrent disease or tumour progression, seven of the 45 dogs received less than the prescribed radiation dose. For WBH, the target rectal temperature was 42 degrees C for 2h and three treatments were planned. In five of the 20 dogs randomized to receive WBH, only one WBH treatment was given because of toxicity. WBH toxicity was severe in six dogs, and resulted in death or interruption in treatment. Most tumours did not undergo a complete response, making it impossible to differentiate tumour recurrence from brain necrosis as a cause of progressive neuropathy. Therefore, survival was the major study endpoint. There was no survival difference between groups. One-year survival probability (95% CI) for dogs receiving radiation therapy alone was 0.44 (0.25, 0.63) versus 0.40 (0.19, 0.63) for dogs receiving radiation and WBH. There was no difference in the incidence of brain necrosis in the two treatment groups. Results suggest that use of WBH alone to increase the temperature of intracranial tumours as a means to improve radiation therapy outcome is not a successful strategy.

Relationship between thermal dose and outcome in thermoradiotherapy treatments for superficial recurrences of breast cancer: data from a phase III trial

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine whether the thermal dose delivered during hyperthermia treatments and other thermal factors correlate with outcome after combined radiation and hyperthermia of breast carcinoma recurrences. Data were from the combined hyperthermia and radiation treatment arms of four Phase III trials, which when pooled together, demonstrated a positive effect of hyperthermia.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four Phase III trials addressing the question of whether hyperthermia could improve the local response of superficial recurrent breast cancer to radiation therapy were combined into a single analysis. Thermal dosimetry data were collected from 120 of the 148 breast cancer recurrence patients who received hyperthermia. The data were analyzed for correlations between thermal parameters as well as important clinical parameters and outcome (complete response rate, local disease free survival, time to local failure, and overall survival).

RESULTS

Five thermal parameters were tested, all associated with the low regions of the measured temperature distributions. Max(TDmin) and Sum(TDmin) were associated with complete response where TDmin is the minimum thermal dose measured by any of the tumor temperature sensors during a treatment: Max(TDmin) is the maximum of TDmin over a series of treatments. Using a categorical relationship with a cutoff of 10 min for Sum(TDmin), the complete response rate was 77% for Sum(TDmin) > 10 min and 43% for Sum(TDmin) < or = 10 min (p = 0.022, adjusted for study center and significant clinical factors). The overall complete response rate for hyperthermia and radiation was 61% compared to 41% for radiation alone. Either Max(TDmin) or Sum(TDmin) were also associated with local disease free survival, time to local failure and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

An earlier report of this trial demonstrated a significant benefit when hyperthermia was added to radiation in the treatment of breast cancer recurrences. The analysis of thermal factors demonstrates that parameters representative of the low end of the measured temperature distributions are associated with initial complete response rate, local disease-free survival, time to local failure and overall survival.

Analysis of thermal parameters obtained during phase III trials of hyperthermia as an adjunct to radiotherapy in the treatment of breast carcinoma

An analysis of 351 HT treatment sessions administered to 101 patients receiving radiotherapy and hyperthermia (RT + HT) who were entered into Phase III concurrent randomized trials for recurrent (BrR) and intact (BrI) breast tumours is presented. A complete response (CR) was recorded in 50 of 84 (59.5%) fields in the case of recurrent breast patients and in 10 of 17 (59%) fields in the case of the intact breast patients. In comparison, 15 of 60 (25%) patients entered into BrR who received RT alone and 8 of 12 (66.7%) patients receiving RT alone entered into BrI trial achieved CR. A set of thermal parameters is defined and evaluated on a treatment by treatment basis. Patient and tumour characteristics influential on CR are identified and thermal parameters which have additional prognostic value are investigated. Multivariate logistic analysis of the non-thermal data showed that maximum depth of tumour, presence or history of disease outside the treated area and RT regimen were most influential on CR. Tumour volume (cm3) (OR = 0.996, 95% CI = 0.993-1.004, p = 0.08) was not a strong prognostic covariate; tumour area and linear dimensions were even less significant (p = 0.41). The cumulative minimum thermal isoeffect dose (equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C) accrued over the 1st, 1st and 2nd, and 1st, 2nd and 3rd treatment sessions was the only thermal parameter to exhibit an association with CR consistently, Other thermal parameters found to contribute to the predictive models were MINTIME > 42 degrees C calculated for the first treatment session and %sensors > 43 degrees C (peak) calculated for the 2nd treatment session.

Biological rationale and clinical experience with hyperthermia

Hyperthermia (HT) as an adjunct to radiation therapy (RT) has been a focus of interest in cancer management in recent years there have been numerous randomized and nonrandomized studies conducted to assess the efficacy of HT combined with either RT or chemotherapy especially in the treatment of superficially seated malignant tumors. The major impact of HT is currently on locoregional control of tumor. Heat may be directly cytotoxic to tumor cells or inhibit repair of both sublethal and potentially lethal damage after radiation. These effects are augmented by the physiological conditions in tumor that lead to states of acidosis and hypoxia. Blood flow is often impaired in tumor relative to normal tissues, and HT may lead to a further decrease in blood flow and augment heat sensitivity. Three major areas of clinical investigation have borne the greatest fruit for HT as adjunctive therapy to RT. These include recurrent and primary breast lesions, melanoma, and head and neck neoplasms. Thermal enhancement ratio was increased in all cases and is approximately 1.4 for neck nodes, 1.5 for breast, and 2 for malignant melanoma. In general, the most important prognostic factors for complete response (CR) are RT dose, tumor size and minimal thermal parameters minimal thermal dose (t43min), mean minimal temperature (Tmin) or T90, i.e., temperature exceeded by 90% of thermal sensors]. The number of HT fractions administered per week appears to have no bearing on the overall response, which may be indicative of the effects of thermotolerance. The total number of HT fractions delivered also appears irrelevant provided adequate HT is delivered in one or two sessions. The major prognostic factors for the duration of local control were tumor histology, concurrent RT dose, tumor depth and Tmin. Although numerous single institution studies showed increased CR rates and improved local control, the efficacy of HT as an adjunct to RT should be assessed with well-designed multi-institutional randomized clinical trials. Such clinical trials are underway.

The potential role of HSP70 as an indicator of response to radiation and hyperthermia treatments for recurrent breast cancer

Twenty-three patients with recurrent breast cancer participating in a Phase III trial evaluating radiotherapy (XRT) with or without hyperthermia (HT) were included in a parallel study of heat shock protein (hsp) expression. The patients had core biopsies and/or fine needle aspirates (FNA) performed on their tumours, before and after treatment. These were analysed for hsp content using immunohistochemical staining with a monoclonal antibody to the inducible form of hsp 70. The proportion of samples containing identifiable cancer cells was greater for the core biopsy specimens (80%) than with FNA (60%). Staining intensity was analysed using either the majority score, i.e. the staining intensity (on a relative scale from 0 to 3) for the largest proportion of tumour cells, or the arithmetic score, which is the sum of the product of percentage of tumour cells and their staining intensity. The staining intensity for hsp's after treatment correlated inversely with the probability of attaining a complete response (CR). Specifically, the median and maximum scores for the biopsy specimens were significantly inversely related to the probability of attaining CR. The results suggest that this technique may be useful in predicting for thermotolerance development, though more data is needed to confirm the utility of the technique. Results from this study corroborate data from other clinical studies which suggest that tumours with elevated hsp levels may demonstrate resistant biologic behaviour.

Thermal treatment parameters are most predictive of outcome in patients with single tumor nodules per treatment field in recurrent adenocarcinoma of the breast

PURPOSE

In previously reported studies using radiation therapy (XRT) and hyperthermia (HT) for treatment of superficial metastases from adenocarcinoma of the breast, we have identified several pretreatment and treatment parameters that correlated with rate of initial complete response (ICR) recorded at 3 weeks and duration of local control (DLC). These parameters include minimal intratumoral temperature, Tmin, and the temperature exceeded by 90% of the measured intratumoral temperatures, T90. Recently, others have shown that thermal dose defined as the cumulative time of isoeffective treatments with T90 = 43 degrees C (CUM EQ MIN T90 43) was predictive of complete response in superficial tumors. We have assessed the prognostic value of several formulations of this parameter for both ICR and DLC in a relatively uniform patient population treated with XRT-HT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The corresponding EQ MIN T90 43 were calculated for 332 HT treatments in 111 HT fields in 83 patients who started treatment between October 1982 and May 1992. Each field contained only one measurable superficially located nodular tumor recurrence or metastasis from adenocarcinoma of the breast that was treated with XRT-HT, had mapped or multiple point temperatures recorded, and had at least one posttreatment follow-up evaluation. The thermal doses from all treatments delivered to a field were added to obtain the total thermal dose, SUM EQ MIN T90 43. Logistic and life-table multivariate analyses were performed to determine which pretreatment parameters (including initial T-stage, prior XRT, and tumor volume at the time of HT) and treatment parameters (including XRT dose, Tmin, T90, thermal dose, and hormonal therapy) best correlated with ICR and DLC.

RESULTS

Of the treatment parameters tested, SUM EQ MIN T90 43 had the strongest correlation with both ICR (p = 0.0002) and DLC (p = 0.0014). Also, SUM EQ MIN T90 43 contributed to the best multivariate models predictive of ICR and DLC.

CONCLUSION

For this relatively uniform patient population, we have confirmed that SUM EQ MIN T90 43 is the treatment parameter most strongly correlated with not only response following XRT-HT, but also duration of local control. This formulation of thermal dose should permit prescriptions to be written for HT treatments. Prospective trials designed to confirm this thermal dose relationship are to be encouraged.

Thermoradiotherapy of superficial and subsurface tumours: analysis of thermal parameters and tumour response

Between 1988 and 1993, 57 superficial and subsurface tumours of various tumour type were treated with a 430-MHz microwave heating device. Mean (range) tumour depth of the 57 tumours was 3.0 (0.5-6.5) cm. Fifty-four tumours were treated with thermoradiotherapy. Total radiation dose ranged from 20 to 70 Gy with a mean of 53 Gy. For the remaining three tumours, thermochemotherapy was performed. Hyperthermia was given once a week, and a total of 207 heat sessions was administered. Our goal of hyperthermia treatment was to elevate all monitored tumour points > 41 degrees C for > 30 min. The mean (range) number of intratumoral thermometry points was 3.7 (2-6). The goal of hyperthermia treatment was achieved in 49% of the sessions. At the time of maximum tumour regression, complete response was noted in 53% of the tumours treated with thermoradiotherapy. Univariate analysis demonstrated that parameters including tumour type (breast cancer versus others), tumour depth, minimum tumour temperature, average tumour temperature, minimum equivalent time at 43 degrees C, and number of heat sessions achieving the treatment goal significantly affected the tumour response of the combined treatment, while total radiation dose and number of heat sessions were not significant factors for tumour response. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that only tumour depth (< 3 versus > or = 3 cm) was a significant prognostic factor for tumour response (p = 0.029). Tumour type (breast cancer versus others) and a number of heat sessions achieving the treatment goal (0-1 versus 2-5) were found to be of borderline significance in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.075 and 0.097 respectively). The number of heat sessions achieving a minimum tumour temperature of > 41 degrees C for > 30 min seems a practical thermal parameter that influences tumour response. The present study indicates the importance of quality and quantity of heat session on the treatment outcome of thermoradiotherapy.

Thermotolerance in human glioma cells

Human glioma cells held in plateau phase were tested for the development of chronic and acute thermotolerance. Long duration, mild hyperthermia at 39-42 degrees C for up to 48 h showed no development of chronic thermotolerance. Heating at 45 degrees C immediately after mild hyperthermia showed that acute thermotolerance did develop for 40-42 degrees C heating. This thermotolerance developed at about the same rate for the three inducing temperatures (40-42 degrees C) but the decay characteristics were temperature dependent. In fact, for 42 degrees C heating thermosensitization to subsequent 45 degrees C heating was achieved after 48 h of heating. These data show that chronic and acute thermotolerance may be different in human glioma cells.

Prognostic factors for tumour response and skin damage to combined radiotherapy and hyperthermia in superficial recurrent breast carcinomas

Prognostic factors for complete tumour response and acute skin damage to combined hyperthermia and radiotherapy were analysed in material of patients with breast cancer, recurrent in previously irradiated areas. Radiotherapy was given daily to a total absorbed dose of 30.0 Gy in 2 weeks or 34.5 Gy in 3 weeks. The first radiotherapy schedule was combined with heat twice weekly, a total of four heat treatments (schedule A). The second radiotherapy schedule was combined with heat either once or twice a week resulting in a total of three (schedule B) or six (schedule C) heat treatments. Heat was induced with microwaves (2450, 915 or 434 MHz) via external applicators and always given after the radiotherapy fraction. The complete response (CR) rate in evaluable patients was 71% (49/69). There was no significant difference in CR rate between the three different hyperthermia schedules. The CR rates were 74% (14/19), 65% (15/23) and 74% (20/27) for schedules A, B and C respectively. The only factor predicting CR, evaluated both uni- and multivariately, was the CRE-value for the present radiotherapy dose (p = 0.02). If only tumours treated with 915 MHz were taken into account, however, then the highest minimum temperature at a given heat session predicted complete response (p = 0.03). This was true also in a multivariate analysis of this subgroup of tumours. A Kaplan-Meier analysis (log rank test) showed no significant difference in duration of CR between the different treatment schedules. Cox's proportional hazards method revealed three significant factors: tumour size (negatively correlated, p = 0.007), the time interval between the diagnosis of the primary tumour and the present treatment (p = 0.02) and the average temperature (0.03). Maximum acute skin reactions in the treatment field were scored according to an ordinal scale of 0-8, modified after WHO 1979. Twenty-six treatment areas (32%) expressed more severe skin damage (score > or = 5) in terms of desquamation with blisters (14%) and necrosis or ulceration (19%). Factors correlated with skin damage were the size of the lesion area (p = 0.011), the highest average maximum temperature during a given heat session (p = 0.03) and the fractionation schedule of hyperthermia (p = 0.05). The extent of previous radiotherapy absorbed dose, previous surgery in the treated area or previous chemotherapy had no significant influence on the acute skin reactions.

Clinical results of thermoradiotherapy for soft tissue tumours

Thirty-one unresectable and/or recurrent soft tissue tumours in 27 patients underwent hyperthermia in combination with radiation therapy. Locoregional hyperthermia was administered once or twice a week for 40-60 min to a total of 2-14 sessions using RF capacitive or microwave heating equipment. Radiation therapy was given 10-20 min before hyperthermia at doses of 20.8 to 70 Gy. The mean +/- SD of the maximum, average, and minimum intratumour temperatures was 44.0 +/- 2.9 degrees C, 42.3 +/- 1.6 degrees C, 40.1 +/- 1.1 degree C respectively, and that of the percentage of the intratumour points that exceeded 41 and 43 degrees C was 66.0 +/- 33.6, and 31.0 +/- 26.1 respectively. Of the 31 tumours treated, 13 (42%) showed CR (complete regression), 10 (32%) PR (> 50 and < 100% regression) and 8 (26%) NC (< 50% regression). Since intratumour low density areas on post-treatment CT scans have been demonstrated to be a useful parameter for assessing tumour response to thermoradiotherapy, the presence of low density areas was also assessed. Low density areas were classified into the following three categories according to the percent area occupied in the maximal cross-section of the tumour: type I, < 50%, type II, 50-80%; type III, > 80%. Of 20 tumours evaluable, 6 (30%) exhibited type III change, 11 (55%) type II and 3 (15%) type I. All of the type III tumours demonstrated a marked response on follow-up or histopathological examination. The major complication associated with treatment was skin ulcer in two patients. The five-year survival of the total 27 patients and 18 patients who had no distant metastases at the start of treatment was 32 and 48% respectively. These results indicate the clinical benefit of thermoradiotherapy using RF capacitive or microwave equipment for locally advanced and/or recurrent soft tissue tumours.

Direct clinical comparison of ultrasound and radiative electromagnetic hyperthermia applicators in the same tumours

Hyperthermia in conjunction with radiation therapy is a promising method for the treatment of superficially or eccentrically located recurrent or advanced primary malignant tumours. The external hyperthermia applicators most commonly used are radiative electromagnetic (including microwave) or ultrasound devices. Each type of device has its own limitations. The aim was to evaluate the temperature distributions obtained as well as the acute and subacute toxicities in patients that were treated with both radiative radiative electromagnetic and ultrasound applicators to the same tumours. Thirty-nine patients treated to 41 hyperthermia fields for a total of 197 hyperthermia treatments were analysed. Thermal parameter include mean, Tmax, mean Tave, mean Tmin, T50, T90, %T > 43.5 degrees C and %T < 41 degrees C. Acute toxicities including pain in field, referred pain, blister/ulceration, positional discomfort and subacute toxicities (occurring with 24 h of treatment) were determined for each type of hyperthermia applicator. Although there were increased acute toxicities (in-field or referred pain) associated with the ultrasound treatments no significant differences between the two methods of heating were observed in temperature distributions or subacute toxicities. We conclude that there is no generally preferred method of heating superficially or eccentrically located tumours and the type of applicator should be selected on a tumour-size and site-specific basis.

The use of generalized cell-survival data in a physiologically based objective function for hyperthermia treatment planning: a sensitivity study with a simple tissue model implanted with an array of ferromagnetic thermoseeds

PURPOSE

A physiologically based objective function for identifying a combination of ferromagnetic seed temperatures and locations that maximizes the fraction of tumor cells killed in pretreatment planning of local hyperthermia.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An objective-function is developed and coupled to finite element software that solves the bioheat transfer equation. The sensitivity of the objective function is studied in the optimization of a ferromagnetic hyperthermia treatment. The objective function has several salient features including (a) a physiological basis that considers increasing the fraction of cells killed with increasing temperatures above a minimum therapeutic temperature (Tmin,thera), (b) a term to penalize for heating of normal tissues above Tmin,thera, and (c) a scalar weighting factor (gamma) that has treatment implications. Reasonable estimates for gamma are provided and their influence on the objective function is demonstrated. The cell-kill algorithm formulated in the objective function is based empirically upon the behavior of published hyperthermic cell-survival data. The objective function is shown to be independent of normal tissue size and shape when subjected to a known outer-surface, thermal boundary condition. Therefore, fractions of cells killed in tumors of different shapes and sizes can be compared to determine the relative performance of thermoseed arrays to heat different tumors.

RESULTS

In simulations with an idealized tissue model perfused by blood at various rates, maxima of the objective function are unique and identify seed spacings and Curie-point temperatures that maximize the fraction of tumor cells killed. In ferromagnetic hyperthermia treatment planning, seed spacing can be based on maximizing the minimum tumor temperature and minimizing the maximum normal tissue temperature. It is shown that this treatment plan is less effective than a plan based on seed spacings that maximize the objective function.

CONCLUSIONS

It is shown that under the assumptions of the model and based on a desired therapeutic goal, the objective function identifies a combination of thermoseed temperatures and locations that maximizes the fraction of tumor cells killed.

Multiple field hyperthermia combined with radiotherapy in advanced carcinoma of the breast

Extensive recurrences on the chest wall of advanced carcinoma of the breast in 20 patients were treated with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia combined with radiation therapy between 1987-1991. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, tumour response and complications of treating extensive lesions with multiple, overlapping fields of hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse encompassing up to 2900 cm2 in area with or without multiple nodules < or = 3 cm deep. All lesions had failed previous therapy with all but three failing previous radiotherapy. Hyperthermia consisted of 282 hyperthermia applicator fields and 357 hyperthermia treatments with external 915 MHz microwaves using commercially available applicators. Hyperthermia applicator fields were defined by the surface 50% SAR distribution of a particular applicator, and hyperthermia fields were abutted to cover the entire tumour bearing area. Radiation therapy consisted of 81 fields to a mean dose of 40 +/- 1 Gy (SE), 88% of fields received between 30 and 50 Gy. The equivalent dose was 42 +/- 1 Gy, based on the linear-quadratic model and alpha/beta = 25 (Fowler 1989). Overlapping hyperthermia fields were separated by an interval of at least three days. Up to four heat sessions per week were required to cover the entire tumour in a rotating fashion. The hyperthermia treatment time was 60 min. Hyperthermia treatments were continued for the duration of radiation therapy. Each hyperthermia applicator field was heated at least once. Patients were exposed to a mean of 14 +/- 3 hyperthermia applicator fields (range of 3-46 fields) and a mean of 18 +/- 3 hyperthermia treatments (range of 6-61) delivered over a mean of 7.5 +/- 0.9 weeks (range of 3-17 weeks). Each field was heated an average of 1.3 times. The tumour complete response rate was 95% with a recurrence rate of 5%. Nevertheless, the mean survival of patients with a complete response was only 10.8 +/- 1.7 months (range of 2-28 months) because of the systemic tumour burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patients. Neither complete response, local control nor survival after thermoradiotherapy correlated with the disease free interval between initial mastectomy and recurrence. There was no evidence of increased thermal damage to skin nor evidence of tumour recurrence at junctions of hyperthermia field overlap. It is concluded that recurrent advanced carcinoma of the breast presenting as extensive, diffuse lesions on the chest wall can be treated as effectively with multiple field patchwork thermoradiotherapy as can nodular lesions treated with single hyperthermia fields.

Thermotolerance and radiation sensitizing effects of long duration, mild temperature hyperthermia

Clinical application of long duration hyperthermia at temperatures < 42 degrees C has traditionally been avoided because of the possibility of chronic thermotolerance development, such as is observed with rodent cells. In support of long duration hyperthermia, both rodent and human cells have been shown to be sensitized to low dose-rate irradiation by simultaneous heating at 40 or 41 degrees C. The relationship between these supposed contradictory responses to hyperthermia were investigated in rat 9L gliosarcoma cells in vitro. Thermotolerance developed during 41 degrees C heating with or without concurrent low dose-rate irradiation. Thermotolerance reached a maximum within 6 h during 41 degrees C heating and remained stable for at least 24 h. When cells were returned to 37 degrees C after heating at 41 degrees C for 6 h, thermotolerance remained stable for at least 12 h. The time course of thermotolerance development correlated with that of induction of 41 degrees C radiation sensitization. Radiation sensitization, on the other hand, was shown to be independent of thermotolerance because the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide prevented thermotolerance induction but had no effect on radiation sensitization. We conclude that thermotolerance development during concurrent clinical application of long duration mild temperature hyperthermia and low dose-rate irradiation should not be a factor in altering treatment outcome.

From laboratory studies to clinical trials: past benefits and future directions in hyperthermia

Three examples of clinical research trials that were direct outgrowths of hyperthermia laboratory investigations performed at Stanford University, as well as elsewhere, are reviewed and directions for future studies presented. The first series of laboratory-clinical studies investigated the influence of the number of hyperthermia treatments on tumour response in combined radiotherapy-hyperthermia regimens. A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed and showed no difference in response rate or duration of local control in combined radiation therapy-hyperthermia regimens comparing two versus six hyperthermia treatments. The results were in agreement with the laboratory studies in RIF murine tumours which suggested that persistent thermotolerance limited the effectiveness of multiple heat treatments in fractionated hyperthermia treatment regimens. The second prospective clinical trial was undertaken to investigate the influence of pretreatment tumour temperatures on subsequent response to radiotherapy and hyperthermia. In agreement with the laboratory studies, low (< 37 degrees C) pretreatment temperatures sensitized superficially located tumours to subsequent hyperthermia treatment. Lower pretreatment temperatures and larger differentials between minimum treatment temperatures and pretreatment maximum or mean temperatures were correlated with the duration of local control. The final studies investigated thermosensitizing agents, agents which were non-toxic at 37 degrees C but became cytotoxic at elevated temperatures. Thermosensitizers such as sulphydryl compounds have demonstrated up to 10,000-fold enhancement of cell killing at exposure to 43 degrees C for 1 h and may be considered for tumour sensitization. However, normal tissue may also be sensitized as was noted for topical anaesthetics such as lidocaine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

HSP 70 synthesis in clinical hyperthermia patients: preliminary results of a new technique

PURPOSE

Although thermotolerance may be an important variable in clinical hyperthermia, few means have been described to measure its effect or duration in the clinical setting. This study was undertaken to determine if heat shock protein 70 could be used as an assay to predict the presence of retained thermotolerance in human tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tissue samples were obtained from patients undergoing hyperthermia and assayed for heat shock protein 70 synthesis. Eight patients having advanced, persistent, or recurrent malignant tumors had open-ended thermometry catheters placed into the lesion being heated. Through these catheters, tissue samples were obtained using a fine needle aspiration technique. Attempts were made to obtain samples before and after the first three heat treatments. Some samples were labeled immediately with radioactive methionine (35S) at 37 degrees C for 4-8 hr, others were given a test heat dose in vitro and then labeled. Protein synthesis profiles were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.

RESULTS

Preliminary results show that it is possible to obtain tissue from hyperthermia patients in a safe and practical manner, that the rate of heat shock protein 70 synthesis can be measured in a variety of tumors, and that the persistence of thermotolerance in the clinical setting can be shown by the inability to reinduce heat shock protein 70 synthesis.

CONCLUSION

The measurement of heat shock protein 70 using the described technique may provide an assay for retained thermotolerance in clinical hyperthermia. Technical difficulties which need to be addressed include obtaining sufficient tissue in all patients, confirming the presence of tumor in the obtained tissue, and obtaining tissue at more frequent intervals to best determine the kinetics of thermotolerance.

Rate of relapse following treatment for localized prostate cancer: a critical analysis of retrospective reports

PURPOSE

Controversy exists over the optimal treatment for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Almost all of the treatment results are from non-randomized trials and interseries comparison is difficult since the apparent success of a treatment, as judged by the actuarial freedom from relapse and survival data, depends on patient selection criteria and post-treatment evaluation, in addition to the efficacy of the therapeutic intervention. In this report the calculation of a hazard function is used to estimate and compare the rate of relapse for the different treatments.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Clinical reports from major surgery and radiation oncology treatment institutions were analyzed. The actuarial recurrence data were used to calculate the annual rate of recurrence within each series.

RESULTS

For all but the lowest volume tumors, patients continue to be at risk of relapse for as long as these series have been followed. Despite the heterogeneity of patient populations, the recurrence rates by stage are similar for patients treated with surgery or irradiation. This result is consistent with pathologic data from prostatectomy specimens which indicate that for lesions > 12 cm3 (approx. 3 cm in diameter) there is high likelihood of extraprostatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcome for patients with localized prostate cancer may be more dependent on the inherent tumor biology than the particular type of treatment. Accordingly, the expectation and recommendation of a treatment must take into consideration the continued risk of relapse with either radiation therapy or surgery. There are, as yet, insufficient data regarding the impact of screening and earlier diagnosis on the curability of patients with localized prostate cancer.

Prognostic factors in metastatic malignant melanoma treated with combined radiation therapy and hyperthermia

From May 1981 to September 1991, 38 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma were treated with combined radiation therapy and hyperthermia to a total of 97 hyperthermia treatment fields. Prior treatments to these sites included surgery (31 patients, 76 fields), chemotherapy (18 patients, 54 fields), immunotherapy (14 patients, 42 fields) and radiation therapy (7 patients, 13 hyperthermia fields). Hyperthermia was given to fields located in the head and neck region, trunk and extremities in 30, 45 and 22 cases, respectively. Nodular-diffuse tumours were present in 86 fields while 11 fields were treated for microscopic residual tumour deposits. Concurrent radiation therapy was given in 180-400 cGy per fraction, 2-5 times per week for a mean total dose of 4098 cGy per field. Hyperthermia treatments were delivered using either microwave or ultrasound devices (286 and 48 treatments, respectively) with a mean (range) of 3.4 (1-14) hyperthermia treatments per field for a mean (range) of 43 (10-70) min per field. Patients (n = 34; 84 fields) were available for follow-up for a mean (range) of 14.6 (0.4-82.5) months. At 3 weeks post-treatment, 34 fields had complete, ongoing, or partial responses; 39 fields had no response; and there were no recurrences in the 11 fields treated for microscopic residual disease. Local control was maintained in 31% (26/84) fields with a mean follow-up of 14.6 months. At 36 months, five patients remained alive with complete control of their treated local disease. Statistical analyses revealed that patients with soft tissue metastases only, who were older at the time of hyperthermia, had a longer time between initial diagnosis and hyperthermia treatment, received a higher dose of radiation, had no previous chemotherapy, and had small tumour volumes, had a higher initial response. Multivariate analyses revealed that the three-covariate model including time interval between initial diagnosis and hyperthermia treatment, previous chemotherapy, and metastases to soft tissue only, best predicted response. The results of the investigation support the continued study of combined radiation therapy and hyperthermia treatments for selected patients with metastatic melanoma, and indicate that long-term survival can occasionally be obtained with this approach.

Timing and sequence of hyperthermia in fractionated radiotherapy of a murine fibrosarcoma

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effect of timing and sequence of hyperthermia on fractionated radiotherapy, since it has been shown that the heat increases the size of hypoxic cell fraction which could affect the effect of subsequent radiation doses.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Animal-tumors were early generation isotransplants of a spontaneous fibrosarcoma, FSa-II, in C3Hf/Sed mice. Tumor response was studied by tumor growth time and TCD50 (50% tumor control dose) assays. The tumor growth time is the time required for one-half of the treated tumors to reach 500 mm3 from the first treatment day. The TCD50 is a radiation dose to control one-half of the treated tumors for 120 days following treatments. One heat treatment at 43.5 degrees C for 45 min was given in a water bath in combination with fractionated doses independently (24 hr interval) or simultaneously (2 min interval). For the normal tissue study, the mouse foot was treated, and the acute foot reaction was scored daily and averaged. The late foot reaction was scored in animals used in the TCD50 assay that developed no recurrence for 120 days. The RD50(2.0) and RD50(5.0), or total radiation doses to induce an average score of 2.0 (complete epilation) and 5.0 (partial foot atrophy) in 50% of treated animals, were calculated.

RESULTS

Thermal radiosensitization was most prominent when heat was combined simultaneously with the first or last radiation dose in both the tumor growth time and TCD50 assays. However, the thermal enhancement was greatest when heat was given either with the first or last radiation dose in the TCD50 assay; whereas it was greatest when heat was administered with the last radiation dose in the tumor growth time assay. Both acute and late skin reactions were significantly potentiated by heat administered 24 hr before the first radiation dose.

CONCLUSION

A significant observation in this study was that, in both the tumor growth time and TCD50 assays, heat given independently or simultaneously did not result in any therapeutic gain compared to the radiation alone treatment.

Temperature differentials between treatment and pretreatment temperatures correlate with local control following radiotherapy and hyperthermia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of pretreatment tumor temperatures and the temperature differential between treatment and pretreatment temperatures on local tumor control in patients who underwent combined radiation therapy and hyperthermia.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Mapped intratumoral temperatures were measured immediately prior to and during hyperthermia in 138 hyperthermia fields among 59 patients with nodular (60 fields) or diffuse (78 fields) superficially-located tumors. In the nodular subgroup there were 40 fields with adenocarcinomas (31 breast, two prostate, seven other primary sites), six melanomas, nine squamous cell carcinomas, and five other histologies. The fields with diffuse tumor involvement consisted of 77 adenocarcinomas (67 breast, 10 other) and one melanoma. The maximum, minimum, and average temperatures were determined for both the pretreatment (pTmax, pTmin, pTave) and treatment (Tmax, Tmin, Tave) distributions and the differences, Dm = Tmin-pTmax, and Da = Tmin-pTave, computed. These quantities were averaged over treatments to produce the corresponding mean quantities for each hyperthermia field. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine treatment and pretreatment parameters which best correlated with the duration of local control.

RESULTS

Pretreatment tumor temperatures were significantly lower than the oral temperatures with mean pTmax, mean pTmin, and mean pTave of 36.2 degrees C, 34.2 degrees C, and 35.4 degrees C, respectively. For the adenocarcinomas with diffuse involvement within the hyperthermia field, the covariates best correlating with local control duration on univariate analysis were concurrent radiation dose (p = 0.0026), Dm (p = 0.009), pTmax (p = 0.012) and Da (p = 0.036). Lower pTmax and larger Dm and Da were predictive for longer local control. In multivariate analyses, all thermal parameters lost power, however, the best model included Dm which was significant at the p = 0.040 level. For the nodular subgroup, nonthermal parameters and dichotomized thermal parameters were of prognostic significance for local control.

CONCLUSION

For fields diffusely involved with adenocarcinoma significant correlations with duration of local control have been demonstrated both for a) low pretreatment temperatures and b) large differentials between treatment and pretreatment intratumoral temperatures. These correlations were also found in a dichotomized description for fields with nodular tumors. The results support the concept that pretreatment hypothermic conditions can lead to an increase in thermal sensitization and may help explain the excellent clinical results noted in the treatment of superficial tumors with radiation and hyperthermia. Further exploitation of this approach by planned cooling of superficially-located recurrent tumors prior to hyperthermia treatment warrants investigation.

'Patchwork' fields in thermoradiotherapy for extensive chest wall recurrences of breast carcinoma

Chest wall lesions of advanced breast carcinoma in 23 patients were treated with thermoradiotherapy with clinical intent between January 1987 and March 1992. Treatment consisted of external 915 MHz microwave hyperthermia with commercially available applicators and radiation therapy to doses between 32-58 Gy. Twenty-three large, diffuse lesions were treated with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia. All lesions were diffuse with or without multiple nodules < or = 3 cm depth. All lesions had failed previous therapy. The mean number of hyperthermia fields per patient was 3.2 +/- 0.4 (range of 2-7). The complete response rate was 91% in this group of extensive, diffuse lesions treated by the patchwork technique. Mean total radiation dose administered concurrently with multiple field patchwork hyperthermia was 42 +/- 1 Gy. The recurrence rate was 5%. The mean survival in patients who had a complete response was 9.0 +/- 1.3 months. The reduced survival among patchwork treated patients was due to the extensive tumor burden existing outside of the treated fields in these patients. The skin reactions were minor, causing minimal discomfort. There was no evidence of increased thermal damage to skin, or of tumor recurrence at junctions of hyperthermia field overlap. It is concluded that extensive, diffuse lesions of chest wall recurrence of advanced carcinoma of the breast can be treated effectively with multiple field patchwork thermotherapy.

Thermoradiation therapy for superficial malignant tumors

BACKGROUND

Between 1980-1990, 126 patients were treated with radiation therapy (RT) and hyperthermia using 915-MHz external microwave applicators. All but 11 patients had failed to respond to previous therapy.

METHODS

The mean tumor volume was 73 +/- 13 cm3, and the mean radiation dose delivered was 45 +/- 1 Gy. Hyperthermia was administered biweekly in 83% of the fields in 5.5 +/- 0.2 sessions. Lesions were stratified by depth. The predictive influence of pretreatment or treatment parameters was analyzed for the probability of response by logistic regression and for the duration of local control by proportional hazards.

RESULTS

In tumors considered potentially heatable (i.e., < or = 3-cm deep), the complete response (CR) rate was 70%, whereas the CR rate for patients with tumors deeper than 3 cm was 18% (P < 0.0001). Among superficial lesions of less than or equal to 3-cm depth that exhibited a CR, 14 recurred (26%, 8.7 +/- 1.6 months), while 39 lesions were recurrence-free at last follow-up of 17.8 +/- 1.4 months. The 50% tumor-effective dose was 44 Gy. For superficial lesions that received between 30-60 Gy, the CR rate was 55% when the fraction size was less than 3 Gy, whereas it was 77% when the fraction size was 3-4 Gy (P = 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that the model best correlating with CR included concurrent radiation dose (P = 0.006) and tumor volume (P = 0.02; model P = 0.0001). Multivariate proportional hazard analysis indicated that the model best correlating with duration of local control included tumor histology (P = 0.004; model P = 0.0007). The overall survival rate of patients with lesions of less than or equal to 3-cm depth who were treated with thermoradiation therapy was 16.1 +/- 1.2 months. For patients with lesions more than 3-cm deep, survival was 8.7 +/- 1.1 months (P < 0.001). Forty-two fields were treated without any skin reactions (33%), 59 exhibited erythema (47%), and 25 experienced thermal blistering (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of superficial malignant tumors can benefit from the adjuvant use of hyperthermia delivered with external 915-MHz applicators provided tumors are less than 3 cm from the surface and the lateral margins are within the 50% specific absorption rate (SAR) on the surface.

Randomized trial of one versus two adjuvant hyperthermia treatments per week in patients with superficial tumours

One test for thermotolerance development in a clinical situation is to evaluate the effects of altering the hyperthermia fractionation interval on tumour response to thermoradiotherapy. Between 1983 and 1990 44 evaluable advanced superficial tumours of miscellaneous origin in 41 patients were randomized to receive either once-weekly or twice-weekly external microwave hyperthermia treatments combined with radiation therapy. The mean age of patients was 62 years, and 85% had failed previous therapy. All lesions were less than 8 x 8 x 4 cm (L x W x D) and were heated by external 915 MHz microwaves. The mean radiation dose was 44 +/- 3 Gy (mean +/- SE) in the once-weekly group and 46 +/- 3 Gy in the twice-weekly group (p = 0.64). The mean volume of the lesions heated once weekly was 17 +/- 6 versus 23 +/- 5 cm3 for those heated twice weekly (p = 0.45). Hyperthermia was administered once weekly for 4.6 +/- 0.2 sessions (range 3-7) or twice weekly for 8.1 +/- 0.3 sessions (range 4-10). Thermometry was performed using 3.4 +/- 0.2 catheters and 5.1 +/- 0.6 thermal sensors per tumour in the once-weekly group, and 2.7 +/- 0.2 catheters and 5.8 +/- 0.3 thermal sensors per tumour in the twice-weekly group. Of the 44 evaluable randomized lesions a complete response (CR) at 2 months post-treatment was observed in 59% (13/22) heated once weekly and 55% (12/22) in those heated twice weekly. The prognostic factors predictive of tumour complete response were found by logistic regression analysis to be radiation dose and tumour volume, while the prognostic factors predictive of duration of response (Cox proportional hazards analysis) were median minimum tumour temperature (Tmin), minimum tumour temperature during the first heat treatment (Tmin1) and tumour volume. The duration of local control in lesions with Tmin < or = 39.5 degrees C was 11.7 +/- 1.9 months while for lesions with Tmin > 39.5 degrees C it was 23.0 +/- 4.2 months (p = 0.01). The ED50 was calculated by logistic regression to be 40 Gy (95% CI = 22-54 Gy) for once- and twice-weekly heated lesions. There was not a significant difference in tumour response or duration of response between populations randomized to receive once- versus twice-weekly hyperthermia treatments. There was also no difference in skin reaction rates between once- and twice-weekly hyperthermia treatments, nor could a correlation be found between any thermal parameter and skin reactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)