Multivariate analysis of factors predicting local relapse after radical prostatectomy--possible indications for postoperative radiotherapy

Comparison of 1-Year Health Care Costs and Use Associated With Open vs Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

IMPORTANCE

With the current patterns of adoption and use of robotic surgery and improvement in the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer, it is important to evaluate the immediate and long-term cost implications of treatments for patients with prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To compare health care costs and use 1 year after open radical prostatectomy (ORP) vs robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used a US commercial claims database from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. A total of 11 457 men aged 18 to 64 years who underwent inpatient radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer and were continuously enrolled with medical and prescription drug coverage from 180 days before to 365 days after inpatient prostatectomy were identified. An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was performed to examine the differences in costs and use of health care services by surgical modality. Data analysis was conducted from September 2019 to July 2020.

EXPOSURES

Type of surgical procedure: ORP vs RARP.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Three outcomes within 1 year after the inpatient prostatectomy were investigated: (1) total health care costs, including reimbursement paid by insurers and out of pocket by patients; (2) health care use, including inpatient readmission, emergency department, hospital outpatient, and office visits; and (3) estimated days missed from work due to health care use.

RESULTS

Of the 11 457 patients who underwent inpatient prostatectomy, 1604 (14.0%) had ORP and 9853 (86.0%) had RARP and most patients (8467 [73.9%]) were aged 55 to 64 years. Compared with patients who underwent ORP, those who received RARP had a higher cost at the index hospitalization (mean difference, $2367; 95% CI, $1821-$2914; P < .001), but similar total cumulative costs were observed within 180 days (mean difference, $397; 95% CI, -$582 to $1375; P = .43) and 1 year after discharge (-$383; 95% CI, -$1802 to $1037; P = .60). One-year postdischarge health care use was significantly lower in the RARP compared with ORP group for mean numbers of emergency department visits (-0.09 visits; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.07 visits; P < .001) and hospital outpatient visits (-1.5 visits; -1.63 to -1.36 visits; P < .001). The reduction in use of health care services among patients who underwent RARP translated into additional savings of $2929 (95% CI, $1600-$4257; P < .001) and approximately 1.69 fewer days (95% CI, 1.49-1.89 days; P < .001) missed from work for health care visits.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Total cumulative cost in this study was similar between ORP and RARP 1 year post discharge; this finding suggests that lower postdischarge health care use after RARP may offset the higher costs during the index hospitalization.

Predictors of prostate bed recurrence on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a standard treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. Biochemical failure after RP is usually evaluated with whole-body imaging to exclude distant metastatic disease, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect local recurrence in the prostatectomy bed. The goal of this study is to correlate disease characteristics and demographic data in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RP to determine association with MRI-detected cancer recurrence.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients who underwent pelvic MRI for rising PSA after RP and had complete clinical and pathological data available were included. Using Chi-squared testing, we analyzed PSA levels, pathological disease characteristics (prostate cancer risk group, Gleason score, extracapsular extension, positive surgical margin, seminal vesicle involvement, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and PSA level before MRI), time from surgery to biochemical failure, and patient demographic characteristics as potential predictors of MRI-detected local recurrence.

RESULTS

Definite MRI-detected local recurrence was observed in 17/64 patients (27%). Eleven (17%) patients had a suspicious lesion with the differential of scarring, retained seminal vesicle, or recurrent cancer. Thirty-six (56%) patients had no evidence of tumor in the prostate bed or pelvis on MRI. Patient race was associated with likelihood of detecting a prostate nodule on MRI (p=0.04), with African American patients having 82% lower odds of MRI-detected tumor recurrence compared with white patients (p=0.045). No other tumor or patient characteristic was significantly associated with MRI-detected recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

African American patients with biochemical failure after RP are less likely to have MRI-detectable recurrence in the prostate bed compared with white patients.

Radiotherapy after Prostatectomy

Aims and background

The role of radiotherapy after prostatectomy is controversial. This paper tries to give some guidelines for everyday practice through an analysis of literature data.

Methods

The potential role of radiotherapy in the adjuvant and salvage setting is discussed. We also report and interpret available literature data for both settings.

Results

As regards an increase in or detectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy, about 40–50% of patients are rendered bNED with local salvage radiotherapy, but only 10–50% are long-term (5 years) biochemically controlled. A timely salvage treatment is crucial to optimize control probability. As regards adjuvant radiotherapy for undetectable postoperative PSA in patients at high risk of failure as judged on pathology, results are more encouraging. Recent data report bNED rates ≥70% at 5 years.

Conclusions

Although results are far from satisfactory, salvage radiotherapy should be considered for every patient with an increased or detectable PSA after surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy seems preferable to salvage radiotherapy for patients at high (>30%) risk of failure.

Benefit on Biochemical Control of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Patients with Pathologically Involved Seminal Vesicles after Radical Prostatectomy

Aims and Background

To determine whether there is a benefit for biochemical control with adjuvant radiation therapy to the surgical bed following radical prostatectomy in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and pathologically negative pelvic lymph nodes (pT3b-pT4 pN0).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of radical prostatectomy patients treated between 1995 and 2002. A total of 66 patients with seminal vesicle invasion were identified: 45 of these patients received adjuvant radiation therapy and 21 were observed. Radiation therapy was initiated within 4 months of prostatectomy. Median dose was 66 Gy (range, 60–70 Gy). Median follow-up from the day of surgery was 40.6 months (mean, 41.5; range, 12–99). Biochemical recurrence was defined as the first value ≥0.2 ng/ml.

Results

At two years, the proportion of patients free from biochemical recurrence was 80% in patients who received adjuvant radiation therapy versus 54% for those not given radiation therapy (P = 0.036). Actuarial biochemical recurrence at 5 years was 59% vs 41% for the radiation therapy and no radiation therapy groups, respectively. On univariate Cox regression model, the hazard of biochemical failure was also associated with a detectable (≥0.2 ng/ml) postsurgical prostate-specific antigen (P = 0.02) prior to radiation therapy. Pathological T stage (pT3b vs pT4), Gleason score, primary Gleason pattern and positive surgical margins were not significantly associated with biochemical recurrence. The hazard of biochemical failure was around 85% lower in the radiation therapy group than in the observation group (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Data from the present series suggest that adjuvant radiation therapy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and undetectable (≤0.2 ng/ml) postoperative prostate-specific antigen significantly reduces the likelihood of biochemical failure.

Blinded review of archival radical prostatectomy specimens supports that contemporary Gleason score 6 prostate cancer lacks metastatic potential

BACKGROUND

Retrospective identification of Gleason pattern 4 in metastatic Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 (GS6) radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens has suggested true GS6 prostate cancer (CaP) lacks metastatic potential. However, pathologist awareness of study design and metastasis outcomes at the time of RP review might have introduced upgrading bias. We used pathologist-blinded methodology for unbiased characterization of metastasis rates for contemporarily defined pathologic GS6 (pGS6) CaP.

METHODS

An institutional RP database was queried to identify pGS6 patients with metastasis or concern for micrometastasis based on: 1) biochemical failure (BF) despite negative surgical margins or 2) incomplete biochemical response to salvage/adjuvant radiation. RP specimens were regraded independently by two genitourinary pathologists blinded to study aims or clinical outcomes. Additional blinding was performed by random inclusion of pGS6 control specimens from BF-free patients. Only upgrading identified independently by both pathologists was considered.

RESULTS

Among 451 pGS6 patients identified, none had synchronous lymph node metastases and 43/451 (10%) suffered BF. Two patients (0.4%) developed metachronous metastasis during a 110-month median follow-up for BF patients. Both metastatic cases had Gleason pattern 4 on blinded RP review, as did 88% of cases with concern for micrometastasis versus 38% of control cases (P = 0.02). All BF patients (29/29) undergoing postoperative radiation had a complete biochemical response or Gleason pattern 4 on blinded RP review.

CONCLUSIONS

Unbiased pathologist review of archival RP specimens supports absent metastatic potential for contemporarily defined GS6 CaP. Reduced postoperative monitoring is appropriate for pGS6, but may require pathology review to confirm absent Gleason pattern 4.

Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: outcome analysis of 307 patients with prostate cancer

AIM

In men with adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy, the most appropriate timing to administer radiotherapy (RT) remains a topic of debate. We analyzed in terms of efficacy, prognostic factors and toxicity the two therapeutic strategies: immediate postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and salvage radiotherapy (SART).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1995 and November 2010, 307 patients underwent adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy, after prostatectomy.

RESULTS

In the PORT group, 42 patients (20.7 %) had biochemical failure, with a median time to biochemical failure of 1.8 years; two parameters (age at diagnosis and PSA pre-RT) resulted to be significant at the survival analysis for overall survival (p = 0.003 and p = 0.046, respectively). In the SART group, 33 patients (31.7 %) had biochemical relapse; sixteen patients died of prostate cancer; postoperative hormones therapy, conformal radiotherapy and level of PSA pre-RT >1.0 ng/ml resulted to be significant at the survival analysis, p = 0.009, p = 0.039 and p = 0.002, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study is limited by its retrospective and nonrandomized design. As such, decisions to treat with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy and the time to initiate therapy were based on patient preference and physician counseling. Our recommendation is to suggest adjuvant radiotherapy for all patients with adverse prognostic factors and to reserve salvage radiotherapy for low-risk patients, when the biochemical recurrence occurs.

Update in systemic therapy of prostate cancer: improvement in quality and duration of life

Overall survival benefit with a docetaxel and prednisone regimen in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer marked a major advance in the management of prostate cancer. Immunotherapy, antiangiogenic therapies and targeted agents are areas of active research interest. Simultaneous progress in palliative and supportive care has enabled us to improve the quality of life of advanced prostate cancer patients. Multiple predictors of outcome have been reported, and systemic therapy is being actively explored in localized disease. This review attempts to summarize the risk profiling strategy in prostate cancer and the existing therapies in high-risk prostate cancer, including some of the novel agents under investigation.

Identification of Patients With Prostate Cancer Who Benefit From Immediate Postoperative Radiotherapy: EORTC 22911

Purpose

The randomized controlled European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial 22911 studied the effect of radiotherapy after prostatectomy in patients with adverse risk factors. Review pathology data of specimens from participants in this trial were analyzed to identify which factors predict increased benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Patients and Methods

After prostatectomy, 1,005 patients with stage pT3 and/or positive surgical margins were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see (n = 503) and an adjuvant radiotherapy (60 Gy conventional irradiation) arm (n = 502). Pathologic review data were available for 552 patients from 11 participating centers. The interaction between the review pathology characteristics and treatment benefit was assessed by log-rank test for heterogeneity (P < .05).

Results

Margin status assessed by review pathology was the strongest predictor of prolonged biochemical disease-free survival with immediate postoperative radiotherapy (heterogeneity, P < .01): by year 5, immediate postoperative irradiation could prevent 291 events/1,000 patients with positive margins versus 88 events/1,000 patients with negative margins. The hazard ratio for immediate irradiation was 0.38 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.54) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.46) in the groups with positive and negative margins, respectively. We could not identify a significant impact of the positive margin localization.

Conclusion

Provided careful pathology of the prostatectomy is performed, our results suggest that immediate postoperative radiotherapy might not be recommended for prostate cancer patients with negative surgical margins. These findings require validation on an independent data set.

Predictive factors for late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine the rate and magnitude of late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities after salvage or adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer, and to determine predictive factors for these toxicities.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A large multi-institutional database that included 959 men who received postoperative RT after radical prostatectomy (RP) was analyzed: 19% received adjuvant RT, 81% received salvage RT, 78% were treated to the prostate bed only, and 22% received radiation to the pelvis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 55 months. At 5 years, 10% of patients had Grade 2 late GU toxicity and 1% had Grade 3 late GU toxicity, while 4% of patients had Grade 2 late GI toxicity and 0.4% had Grade 3 late GI toxicity. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that adjuvant RT (p = 0.03), androgen deprivation (p < 0.0001), and prostate bed-only RT (p = 0.007) predicted for Grade 2 or higher late GU toxicity. For GI toxicity, although adjuvant RT was significant in the univariate analysis, no significant factors were found in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the number of high-grade toxicities for postoperative RT was low. Therefore, adjuvant and salvage RT can safely be used in the appropriate settings.

Timing and patterns of recurrences and deaths from prostate cancer following adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy for pathologic stage T3/4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate

To determine the timing and patterns of late recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) alone or RP plus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Between 1970 and 1983, 159 patients underwent RP for newly diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and were found to have positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension and/or seminal vesicle invasion. Of these, 46 received adjuvant RT and 113 did not. The RT group generally received 45-50 Gy to the whole pelvis, then a boost to the prostate bed (total dose of 55-65 Gy). In the RP group, 62% received neoadjuvant/adjuvant androgen deprivation vs 17% in the RT group. Patients were analyzed with respect to timing and patterns of failure. Only one patient was lost to follow-up. The median follow-up for surviving patients was nearly 20 years. The median time to failure in the surgery group was 7.5 vs 14.7 years in the RT group (P=0.1). Late recurrences were less common in the surgery group than the RT group (9 and 1% at 10 and 15 years, respectively vs 17 and 9%). In contrast to recurrences, nearly half of deaths from prostate cancer occurred more than 10 years after treatment. Deaths from prostate cancer represented 55% of all deaths in these patients. Recurrences beyond 10 years after RP in this group of patients were relatively uncommon. Despite its long natural history, death from prostate cancer was the most common cause of mortality in this population with locally advanced tumors, reflecting the need for more effective therapy.

Long-Term Benefits of Elective Radiotherapy After Prostatectomy for Patients With Positive Surgical Margins

PURPOSE

The benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy after prostatectomy for patients with pathological risk factors but with an undetectable postoperative PSA remains controversial. In this retrospective study we define the benefits of elective postoperative radiotherapy in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients received elective postoperative radiotherapy at a single institution in the PSA era (1989 to 1995) for positive surgical margins and undetectable postoperative PSA. Radiotherapy was delivered to a median dose of 60 Gy. Clinical target volume included the prostate bed. Pelvic nodes were not treated. The four-field box technique with customized blocking of bladder, rectum and small bowels was used and defined the planning target volume. The patients were then compared to a contemporaneous group of 189 patients with positive surgical margins who underwent radical prostatectomy without any adjuvant therapy. Failure was defined as biochemical (PSA) recurrence and was timed from first detectable PSA.

RESULTS

The 5 and 10-year biochemical no evidence of disease was 90.9% and 90.9% for the elective postoperative radiotherapy group, and 66.4% and 54.5% for the observation group, respectively (p = 0.0012). Median time to biochemical failure was also longer in the elective postoperative radiotherapy group (88.6 months) compared to the observation group (43.5 months) (p <0.001). Risk factors for biochemical recurrence on multivariate analysis were Gleason score greater than 7 (p = 0.017), established extracapsular extension (p = 0.002) and lack of elective postoperative radiation (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the longest followup studies showing that elective postoperative radiation therapy is associated with improved bNED and prolonged time to recurrence. Combined radical prostatectomy and elective postoperative radiotherapy should be considered in the management of high risk prostate cancer, especially in the presence of positive surgical margins despite undetectable PSA.

Postoperative adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer: impact on freedom from biochemical relapse and survival

OBJECTIVES

To determine the therapeutic outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

Between 1982 and 2000, 163 patients were treated with RT after radical prostatectomy. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 107 consecutive node-negative patients (T2-T4N0) referred to our institution less than 1 year after surgery for postoperative RT. Salvage treatment was delivered to 56 patients for a persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen level, biochemical relapse after surgery, or local recurrence.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 70 months (range 2 to 167) from the initiation of RT. Patients treated with adjuvant RT were less likely than those treated with salvage RT to experience biochemical relapse. At 5 and 10 years, the rate of freedom from biochemical relapse was 80% and 66% in the adjuvant cohort compared with 39% and 22% for patients treated with salvage intent, respectively (P <0.0001). This did not translate into a statistically significant improvement in absolute survival (72% versus 70%) or cause-specific survival (93% versus 86%) at 10 years. On multivariate analysis, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.0187), presence of seminal vesicle involvement (P = 0.0002), and referral indication for postoperative RT (salvage versus adjuvant RT; P <0.001) were predictors of biochemical relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-institution experience, patients at high risk of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy realized a greater biochemical relapse-free survival benefit when treated with adjuvant RT than with salvage RT. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and seminal vesicle involvement predicted for inferior treatment outcome.

Adjuvant and salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy: current practice in the UK

OBJECTIVE

To survey UK urologists and radiation oncologists in the evaluation and treatment of localised prostate cancer in the adjuvant and salvage setting.

METHODS

Postal questionnaires were mailed to 292 urologists and 98 radiation oncologists in the UK.

RESULTS

In all, 188 (48%) questionnaires were returned. In total, 72/128 (56%) of the urologist respondents and 58/60 (97%) of the oncologist respondents perform routine radical prostate treatment. Among 43 (60%) of the urologist, 40 (69%) recommended adjuvant treatment, which could be radiotherapy, hormonal treatment or combined hormonal and radiation treatment. There is no significant difference between the modality of treatment recommended. The poor prognostic factors that would influence the decision to offer adjuvant treatment include a detectable postoperative PSA, seminal vesicle involvement, positive margins, Gleason score>8 and pathological T3. With regard to the choice of hormonal treatment, most urologists preferred antiandrogens, whereas most oncologists prefer lutienising hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue (P=0.03). Regarding salvage treatment, there is a wide variation in the PSA threshold and number of PSA rises before initiation of investigations and treatment. Significantly more urologists recommended salvage radiotherapy (P=0.02), whereas oncologists recommended combined hormonal radiation therapy (P=0.03). There is a wide variation of practice regarding the duration of hormonal treatment, the type of investigations initiated, range of radiotherapy doses and treatment volumes.

CONCLUSION

There is a wide variation in practice among UK clinicians.

Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy

Prostate cancer has undergone a stage migration since the advent of widespread PSA testing, yet still a significant number of men develop PSA recurrence following radical prostatectomy. This causes anxiety to the patient and the urologist. This review examines the clinical significance of biochemical relapse and the role of imaging modalities and anastomotic biopsies. The importance of the radical prostatectomy pathological features and the PSA kinetics in determining the site of recurrence and the best treatment modality is emphasised. The optimal timing and dose of salvage radiotherapy and the role of hormonal therapy is discussed.

What is the best postoperative treatment for patients with pT3bN0M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate?

The purpose of this paper to identify the optimal therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP) for patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate invading the seminal vesicles (pT3bN0M0 or SVI). A PubMed search using the keywords 'prostate', 'seminal vesicle', 'prostatectomy', 'radiotherapy', 'androgen blockade' was performed to identify literature regarding rates of disease failure in patients with SVI who are observed or treated with androgen blockade (AB), radiotherapy (RT) or RT + AB after RP. The outcome of 68 patients treated at Duke University with post-operative AB, RT or RT + AB for pT3bN0M0 is also presented. More than 70% of patients with SVI develop disease recurrence after surgery. For many, recurrence occurs within 2 y after RP. These patients have poor control rates with postoperative RT alone. While experience with AB and RT+AB is limited, control rates are generally superior to RT alone. At Duke University, after a median follow-up of nearly 4 y, patients treated with RT + AB or AB alone for pT3bN0M0 achieved better 5-y progression-free survival (PFS) compared with those who received RT alone (78 and 68 vs 30%, P = 0.03 and 0.046, respectively). There was no PFS difference between those who received AB alone or RT + AB (68 vs 78%, P=0.5). Seminal vesicle invasion confers a poor prognosis after RP. SVI is a consistent predictor of poor outcome after RT. The limited data available examining AB and RT + AB in pT3bN0M0 disease, including data from Duke University, are encouraging. Nonetheless, postoperative AB, RT and RT + AB for pT3bN0M0 disease require prospective evaluation, as RP alone is rarely curative.

Comparison of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy policies for postprostatectomy radiotherapy

PURPOSE

We compared the long-term results of postprostatectomy radiotherapy (RT) from two institutions, one adapting a prospective policy of adjuvant RT and the other salvage RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1989 and 1997, 69 patients were referred for adjuvant RT to the institution using adjuvant RT and 88 patients with evidence of recurrence were treated in the institution using salvage RT. The salvage group underwent RT after longer postoperative intervals (median, 40.3 vs. 2.9 months; p <0.0001) and had higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values before starting RT (4.5 vs. 0.86 ng/mL; p = 0.003). Both groups were routinely treated to a minimal total dose of 60 Gy. The treatment groups were analyzed for overall survival, disease-specific survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Of the 69 patients referred for adjuvant RT, 22 (32%) had nonzero PSA values before RT. Multivariable modeling of BRFS found only the PSA value before RT to be statistically significant (p <0.0001). RT after prostatectomy was equally effective in either setting when the pre-RT PSA level was <1 ng/mL. When the PSA value before RT was >or=1 ng/mL, the 5-year BRFS for each group was inferior.

CONCLUSION

Although the adjuvant treatment policy was associated with significantly improved BRFS, this was attributable to low pre-RT PSA values. When the treatment groups were stratified for pre-RT PSA level, the differences in BRFS were not statistically significant. Patients with a rising PSA level after prostatectomy, regardless of their initial risk, should receive prompt referral for RT.

External beam radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy: efficacy and impact on urinary continence

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of adjuvant and salvage external beam radiation (AXRT+SXRT) for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) has been debated because of the inability to rule out systemic occult metastasis, uncertainty that radiation eradicates residual local disease and the potential of exacerbating impotency and incontinence. To characterize the effectiveness and treatment morbidity a retrospective review was performed.

METHODS

In all, 38 patients received AXRT and 91 received SXRT. The SXRT group was stratified by PSA level, age, race, pathologic stage, margin status, worst Gleason sum, radiation dose and pelvic field. Complications evaluated were impotence and incontinence. Median follow-up was 60.2 months.

RESULTS

The 5-y disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 61.3% for AXRT and 36.3% for SXRT. Multivariate analysis of the SXRT cohort showed Gleason score, pathologic stage and pre-XRT PSA to be predictors of disease recurrence. After XRT 26% had worsened continence.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who recur after RP whose pathologic stage is pT2 or pT3c, Gleason score of 8 or higher or pre-XRT PSA is >2.0 ng/dl may have microscopic metastatic disease and a decreased chance of cure with SXRT alone. Continence was further impaired after XRT.

Salvage radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer

For patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma, the most common cause of failure is an asymptomatic increase in levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Salvage radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate bed has been used when there is no clinical evidence of metastatic disease. However, this is still not widely accepted because there is currently no consensus on the optimal management of an isolated PSA failure. Salvage RT given in a select group of patients is effective, with a 70% to 80% biochemical response rate and a long-term biochemical control rate as high as 35% to 40%. These data indicate that RT offers a substantial risk of curative salvage of patients who fail radical prostatectomy. Although there is interest in studying investigational modalities (eg, vaccine therapy) among patients with asymptomatic, PSA-detected recurrences after surgery, caution must be applied, and treatment modalities with known curative potential (ie, RT) should be used before noncurative techniques are attempted. This article outlines the rationale, results, and toxicity of salvage RT for an asymptomatic increase in PSA levels, with emphasis on identifying patients with favorable prognostic factors with higher rates of long-term biochemical control with local treatment.

Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a highly effective treatment for patients with prostate cancer. However, patients with positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy have less than ideal outcomes with 5-year progression rates between 36% and 50%. Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is often advocated for improving these outcomes. We identified predictors of response to adjuvant RT given for positive margins after RP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of men who underwent RP between 1987 and 1999 at our institution and who received adjuvant RT for positive surgical margins. Only patients in whom prostate specific antigen (PSA) was undetectable after RP as well as before the initiation of RT were included. Numerous clinicopathological variables, including pre-RP PSA, pathological stage, margin length and location, and extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle involvement, were assessed for their adverse effect on the biochemical recurrence rate after adjuvant RT.

RESULTS

A total of 62 men met our inclusion criteria. Median age at surgery was 60.7 +/- 6.1 years and median PSA at presentation was 9.0 ng/ml (range 1.4 to 64.9). The median RT dose was 60.0 +/- 3.6 Gy. RT was started a median of 5.0 +/- 3.6 months after RP. The 5 and 10-year biochemical disease-free survival rates for the whole group were 90.2% and 87.9%, respectively. Of all parameters tested only Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater (p = 0.037) and pre-RP PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml (p = 0.040) were predictive of biochemical recurrence after adjuvant RT on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis only pre-RP PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml remained an independent predictor (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of true adjuvant RT in patients with positive margins after RP and undetectable PSA those with predominant Gleason grade 4 or greater, or PSA greater than 10.9 ng/ml at presentation are at increased risk for recurrence after adjuvant RT.

Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The optimal role of radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate bed after radical prostatectomy (RP) is the subject of much debate. In this study, the results of adjuvant RT (ART) and salvage RT (SRT) were compared.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 146 lymph node-negative patients were treated postoperatively after RP with RT to the prostate bed between 1987 and 1998. Of these, 75 patients had an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and were treated with ART for adverse pathologic features only to a median dose of 60 Gy (range 51-70). A positive margin was identified in 96%, and two of the three with negative margins had seminal vesicle involvement (SVI). SRT was administered for either a persistently detectable PSA level after RP (n = 27) or for a delayed rise in PSA (n = 44) to a median dose of 70 Gy (range 60-78). Adjuvant androgen ablation was given to 37 patients; 2 who had received ART and 35 had who received SRT. The median duration of androgen ablation was 24 months. The primary end point was freedom from biochemical failure (bNED), which was considered to be an undetectable PSA level. The median follow-up was 53 months for all patients: 68 months for the ART patients and 35 months for the SRT patients.

RESULTS

For the ART group, 8 patients subsequently developed a rising PSA level. The 5-year bNED rate was 88%. SVI was the strongest predictor of outcome, with a 5-year bNED rate of 94% for those without SVI and 65% for those with SVI (p = 0.0002). SVI was the only significant factor in Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the ART cohort. For the SRT group, 20 patients developed a rising PSA level after RT. The 5-year bNED rate was 66% for all SRT patients, and 43% and 78% in those with a persistently detectable PSA and those with a delayed rise in PSA, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, this subdivision of SRT was statistically significant. Moreover, when the Cox model included all patients and variables, the timing of RT (ART vs. SRT) was an independent correlate of bNED, as was androgen ablation.

CONCLUSION

For RP patients with high-risk pathologic features, the timing of postoperative RT and the PSA status after RP were strong determinants of outcome. Because of the potential confounding factors, direct comparisons of ART and SRT are problematic; however, ART is extremely effective and offers the surest approach for maintaining biochemical control.

Long-term results of three-dimensional conformal adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in the adjuvant and salvage setting after radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

From 1986 to 1997, 38 patients received adjuvant 3D-CRT, with a median time from RP to 3D-CRT of 2.8 months, and 57 patients were treated with salvage RT for a rising prostate-specific antigen with a median time to 3D-CRT of 27.7 months. The median radiation dose was 64.8 Gy. The median follow-up from completion of RT was 7.0 years (range 1.0 to 14.2).

RESULTS

Overall, the 8-year actuarial rate of biochemical disease-free survival was 40% in all patients. The 8-year biochemical disease-free survival rate was 45% (standard error [SE] 8%) and 30% (SE 7%) for the adjuvant and salvage group, respectively, from RT completion. When measured from the date of RP, the 5 and 8-year biochemical disease-free survival rate for salvage radiotherapy was 58% and 37%, respectively. The corresponding results for adjuvant RT were similar at 53% and 45%. On multivariate analysis, the Gleason score was the only prognostic factor predictive of prostate-specific antigen failure in the salvage group. No prognostic factor was significant in the adjuvant group. The prevalence of major complications after 3D-CRT was low using physician-reported data.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term biochemical control can be achieved in both adjuvant and salvage settings. For patients receiving salvage RT, a Gleason score greater than 7 was predictive of prostate-specific antigen failure. Prospective trials are needed to improve further on these results.

Avoidance and management of positive surgical margins before, during and after radical prostatectomy

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy lead to an increased risk of progression and reduced disease free survival. Earlier detection of prostate cancer, appropriate patient selection and improved operative techniques can reduce the incidence of positive margins, though the risk can not be eliminated as pre-operative staging techniques are not sufficiently sensitive. Nerve sparing and bladder neck sparing do not adversely affect margin status in appropriately selected men. Once positive margins have been diagnosed the optimal management and the timing of treatment remains controversial. Adjuvant radiotherapy or salvage radiotherapy in men with a low PSA may improve local control and PSA free survival in some individuals, a survival benefit has not yet been established.

Adjuvant external radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy for node-negative prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of adjuvant radiation therapy following prostatectomy is commonplace. The purpose of this review is to summarize completed and ongoing clinical trials and to review recent relevant studies and debates related to this subject.

RECENT FINDINGS

The routine use of adjuvant radiation therapy remains a controversial topic. Recent retrospective matched-pair analyses support its use in appropriately selected patients with positive margins, extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion, but interpretation of these and other data vary. Although the 5-year biochemical recurrence rate using adjuvant radiotherapy may be decreased from approximately 40 to 10% in patients with either positive margins or extraprostatic extension, its effect on cause-specific mortality is unclear. Two prospective randomized trials with cumulative enrollment of over 1400 patients have examined the role of adjuvant radiation therapy compared with observation following prostatectomy: one trial was a National Cancer Institute-sponsored Intergroup study coordinated by the Southwest Oncology Group, and the other was from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Currently, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group is conducting a three-arm trial, with broadened stratification criteria as compared with previous trials. This ongoing trial examines the use of adjuvant radiotherapy with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation following prostatectomy and also androgen deprivation alone in patients at high risk for disease relapse.

SUMMARY

In lieu of data from completed randomized trials, indications for immediate adjuvant radiation therapy following prostatectomy exist and are supported by retrospective data with respect to reducing local and biochemical recurrence rates. However, data demonstrating an overall or cause-specific survival advantage for adjuvant radiotherapy as compared with delayed salvage therapy do not exist.

Predictors of biochemical outcome with salvage conformal radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of biochemical outcome following radiotherapy in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy received salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) alone or with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Tumor-related and treatment-related factors were evaluated to identify predictors of subsequent PSA failure.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time after 3D-CRT was 42 months. The 4-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 46%, 83%, and 95%, respectively. Multivariate analysis, which was limited to 70 patients receiving radiation without androgen deprivation therapy, showed that negative/close margins (P =.03), absence of extracapsular extension (P <.01), and presence of seminal vesicle invasion (P <.01) were independent predictors of PSA relapse after radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did not improve the 4-year PSA relapse-free survival in patients with positive margins, extracapsular extension, and no seminal vesicle invasion (P =.24). However, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did improve PSA relapse-free survival when one or more of these variables were absent (P =.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage 3D-CRT can provide biochemical control in selected patients with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy. Among patients with positive margins and no poor prognostic features, 77% achieved PSA control after salvage 3D-CRT. Salvage neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy may improve short-term biochemical control, but it requires further study.

Outcome, morbidity, and prognostic factors in post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: an Australian multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To report the outcome and morbidity data for patients treated with post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PPRT) in a multicenter collaboration.

METHODS

The case records of all patients treated with PPRT from 1996 to 1998 were reviewed. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) remission was defined as a PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or less. Acute and late morbidities were documented.

RESULTS

We reviewed the data of 115 patients, with a median follow-up from the start of PPRT of 28.7 months. Patients were treated with adjuvant intent (n = 23), for local recurrence (n = 27), or for a detectable PSA level (n = 65). The overall and cause-specific survival rate at 5 years was 73.7% and 81.4%, respectively. The biochemical disease-free survival rate was 69.6% at 2 years and 50% at 5 years. Factors predicting for subsequent relapse on multivariate analysis were pre-PPRT PSA (P = 0.013) and post-PPRT nadir (P <0.0001). Patients with a PSA greater than 1 ng/mL fared significantly worse than those with lower levels (P <0.0001). For patients with a pretreatment PSA of less than 1 ng/mL and an operative Gleason score of 7 or less, the 5-year projected biochemical disease-free survival rate was 71%. One case of grade 3 late proctitis was recorded, and 4 patients had continued grade 3 late urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSIONS

Early use of PPRT is effective and well tolerated in patients at risk of, or with proven, local recurrence.

The evolving role of systemic therapy in high risk prostate cancer: strategies for cure in the 21st century

High-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous group that includes patients with clinically locally advanced stage disease at diagnosis. Unlike overt locally advanced disease, prediction of risk in clinically localized disease at an individual patient level, is not always easy or accurate with present knowledge. Gleason score, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), and stage (capsular invasion, seminal vesicle and nodal involvement) are the universally recognized criteria used to define risk. Overall, this group of patients have a greater than 50% risk of relapse. Historically, local treatment modalities with radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy constituted the mainstay of therapy in the majority of localized prostate cancer patients. However, the primary cause of failure and disease mortality stems from the development of systemic metastases. As we continue to witness stage migration towards earlier stage disease (presumably PSA related) and mortality reduction, devising better strategies for cure is a must. Recently completed randomized trials indicate a benefit from the use of hormonal therapy in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy or node positive patients, post radical prostatectomy. While hormone-based combined modality trials have consistently shown improvements in local and systemic disease control, only two of these demonstrated improvements in overall survival. The palliative benefit of chemotherapy in hormone refractory disease and the promising response rates with newer agents has evoked interest in the use of chemotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. Several phase II and III trials are ongoing. Novel avenues of therapy such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, gene therapy and angiogenesis inhibitors incorporated in a multimodality treatment strategy are likely to impact the course of this disease in the future.

Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma: analysis of efficacy and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES

To determine the probability of biochemical control for patients treated with salvage irradiation and identify prognostic factors associated with successful salvage. The optimal management of prostate cancer in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy remains unclear.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 54 patients with node-negative prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy alone between 1991 and 1998 for isolated biochemical relapse after prostatectomy. The median preoperative PSA level was 15 ng/mL, and the median salvage PSA level was 1.3 ng/mL. Complete pathologic information was recorded, as was the interval to postoperative PSA failure. Radiotherapy was delivered to the prostatic fossa using appropriate techniques. The primary endpoint was biochemical failure, measured from radiotherapy initiation to the first detectable PSA level. Biochemical control rates were determined using Kaplan-Meier methods. The median follow-up was 45 months.

RESULTS

The initial complete response rate was 76%. Only seminal vesicle status demonstrated borderline significance for the rate of the initial complete response. The 5-year actuarial biochemical control rate was 35%. The presence of seminal vesicle invasion, Gleason score greater than 6, and an immediately detectable postoperative PSA level all predicted for decreased 5-year biochemical control. Gleason score and detectable postoperative PSA retained significance on multivariate analysis. Those with a salvage PSA level of 1.2 ng/mL or less had a trend toward a decreased 5-year biochemical control rate (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage radiotherapy yields a 76% complete response rate, with 35% of treated patients free of a detectable PSA at 5 years. Those with favorable biochemical and pathologic tumor features are most likely to remain disease free.

Positive resection margin and/or pathologic T3 adenocarcinoma of prostate with undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: to irradiate or not?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for positive resection margin and/or pathologic T3 (pT3) adenocarcinoma of the prostate with undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients with a positive resection margin and/or pT3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had undetectable postoperative serum PSA levels after radical prostatectomy. Seventy-three patients received postoperative adjuvant RT and 52 did not. Follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 12.0 years (median 4.2 for the irradiated group and 4.9 for the nonirradiated group). PSA outcome was available for all patients. Freedom from failure was defined as the maintenance of a serum PSA level of < or =0.2 ng/mL, as well as the absence of clinical local recurrence and distant metastasis.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the 5-year actuarial overall survival between the irradiated and nonirradiated group (94% vs. 95%). However, patients receiving adjuvant RT had a statistically superior 5-year actuarial relapse-free rate, including freedom from PSA failure, compared with those treated with surgery alone (88% vs. 65%, p = 0.0013). In the irradiated group, 8 patients had relapse with PSA failure alone. None had local or distant recurrence. In the nonirradiated group, 15, 1, and 2 had PSA failure, local recurrence, and distant metastasis, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, pre-radical prostatectomy PSA level and adjuvant RT were statistically significant predictive factors for relapse, and Gleason score, extracapsular invasion, and resection margin status were not. There was a suggestion that seminal vesicle invasion was associated with an increased risk of relapse. The morbidity of postoperative adjuvant RT was acceptable, with only 2 patients developing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 genitourinary complications. Adjuvant RT had a minimal adverse effect on urinary continence and did not cause serious gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant RT was associated with a lower risk of relapse, including freedom from PSA failure, compared with observation alone for pT3 and/or margin-positive disease with undetectable postoperative PSA levels. This was accomplished with a minimal risk of serious RT morbidity.

Postoperative radiotherapy for carcinoma of the prostate: impact on both local control and distant disease-free survival

The role of postoperative irradiation in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, either as an adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy, remains controversial. In this study, we evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy on patients diagnosed with prostate cancer with respect to biochemical and clinical disease free survival. Between 1987 and 1996, 179 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were found to have adverse histopathologic findings on radical prostatectomy specimens (positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, and seminal vesicle invasion). Of these patients, 42 were referred for postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, whereas 73 were referred for salvage irradiation because of rising serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels postoperatively. The remaining 64 patients underwent prostatectomy only. The 10-year biochemical relapse-free survival (RFS) from date of surgery were 88%, 45%, and 25% for patients treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, salvage irradiation, and with surgery alone, respectively (p = 0.046). Ten-year distant RFS from date of surgery were 82%, 74%, and 44% for adjuvantly treated patients, those with salvage radiotherapy, and those with surgery alone, respectively (p = 0.0180). Ten-year overall disease RFS from date of surgery was 89%, 76%, and 30% for adjuvantly treated patients, those with salvage radiotherapy, and those with surgery alone, respectively (p = 0.0237). Multivariate analyses revealed that a preoperative PSA greater than 20 ng/ml and pathologic Gleason Score of 8 to 10 were adverse predictors for biochemical relapse, whereas pathologic Gleason Score of 8 to 10, seminal vesicle invasion, and extracapsular extension were adverse predictors of distant metastases. Postoperative radiotherapy, either delivered as adjuvant treatment for adverse histopathologic findings or as salvage therapy for local relapses, appear to confer superior local, distant disease RFS, and overall disease RFS than surgery alone.

Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy is more effective and less toxic than salvage radiotherapy for a rising prostate specific antigen

Despite the trend toward earlier diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate, approximately 25% of men undergoing radical prostatectomy will have pathologic evidence of cancer extending outside of the prostate. These patients are at high risk for subsequent recurrence. Such relapses are almost always manifested initially as a rise in the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). Currently utilized PSA assays, however, will not detect a recurrence smaller than 10(7) to 10(8) cells, nor does PSA identify the site of recurrence. In contrast, the pathologic findings at the time of surgery can be used to reliably distinguish patients at risk for local recurrence from those more likely to fail distantly. Furthermore, adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy after prostatectomy, given to patients with an undetectable PSA who are at high risk for local recurrence, results in a higher disease free survival and fewer side effects than if radiotherapy is delayed until the PSA begins to rise. Thus, patients at high risk for local failure following radical prostatectomy, but at low risk for distant metastases (i.e., those with positive surgical margins and an undetectable PSA) should be offered immediate adjuvant radiotherapy.

Radiation therapy (RT) after prostatectomy: The case for salvage therapy as opposed to adjuvant therapy

Patients with pathologic stage T3 or T4 prostate cancer who have undetectable PSA levels following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) have a substantial risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy (RT) can be administered immediately following the RRP (immediate adjuvant RT) or may be postponed until the PSA level has risen to a level that is indicative of residual or recurrent prostate cancer (salvage RT). Immediate adjuvant RT can significantly reduce the risk of relapse, but does not appear to increase the rate of survival. Approximately two-thirds of patients with rising PSA levels after RRP can be salvaged with RT alone. This result was achieved in patients treated with an adequate dose of radiation before the PSA rose to > 1.1 ng/ml. While no one can be certain which approach (adjuvant or salvage RT) is better, future studies should examine this issue. Whether immediate postoperative adjuvant RT is of value to patients is the subject of two randomized prospective studies. The benefit of adjuvant RT is a matter of controversy. Salvage RT treats only those patients with proven residual prostate cancer. The salvage RT approach has several advantages. This approach spares approximately 40% of patients who have had an RRP for T3 or T4 prostate cancer and eliminates the risks and costs associated with adjuvant RT. Additionally, it appears that the results of immediate adjuvant RT are similar to those achieved with early salvage RT.

Adjuvant chemo-/hormonal therapy trials for locally advanced prostate cancer

Patients with clinical or pathologic locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPC) are at risk for systemic and local disease progression or relapse. Pre- and post-therapy predictors of risk include prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, clinical and pathologic stage, Gleason's score (GS) of the biopsy and prostatectomy specimens, positive margins, and post-therapy PSA kinetics. Combined modality trials have been done predominantly in LAPC patients treated with radiation. The data indicate a local control and disease-free survival advantage to the use of androgen deprivation. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy with radical prostatectomy (RP) has no proven role thus far; however, recent data on adjuvant hormonal therapy in patients with pathologic D1 disease treated with radical prostatectomy suggest a potential benefit. Chemotherapy trials are still in their infancy but present exciting opportunities for future research. The heterogeneity in the hormone responsiveness of prostate cancer, the availability of several active chemotherapy combinations, and the refinement in risk prediction have stimulated a series of adjuvant therapy trials which constitute the subject of this discussion. Emphasis on enrollment in clinical trials is thus imperative in LAPC.

Radiotherapy for a rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: the first 10 years

PURPOSE

To determine the results of radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate bed for a presumed local recurrence heralded by a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1987 to 1997, 89 patients were treated by the senior author (M.S.A.) with RT to the prostate bed for a rising PSA after RP. No patients had clinical or radiographic evidence of local or distant disease. The RT technique was usually a 4-field box with fields shaped to protect normal tissues. Of the 89 patients, 36 (40%) were treated using three-dimensional conformal RT (3DRT) using beam's eye view technique; the remaining 53 patients (60%) were irradiated using a standard two-dimensional approach. The median dose was 66 Gy. Patients were followed at 3- to 6-month intervals after completing RT with a history, physical examination, and PSA. Late normal tissue toxicity was scored using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. An undetectable PSA was required to be considered free of prostate cancer (NED).

RESULTS

Eighty-seven percent of patients had pathologic stage III/IV disease. Three patients had lymph node involvement. The median PSA prior to RT was 1.4 ng/mL. The median Gleason score was 7. Of the 89 patients, 64 (72%) became NED. Of these 64 patients, 47 (73%) remain NED at last follow-up (median follow-up = 48 months). The estimated 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) for all patients is 50%. The DFS at 4 years was 61% for the 3DRT patients vs. 41% for those treated without 3DRT (p = 0.006). Late complications (Grade 1/2 only), however, were significantly more common in the 3DRT group. On multivariate analysis, only dose > 65 Gy predicted for better DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic RT may achieve sustained remission of prostate cancer for about half of patients with a rising PSA after RP, at least in the intermediate term. Doses > 65 Gy are recommended. 3DRT may offer improved disease-free survival over non-3D approaches, however, this issue requires further study.

Effect of combined transient androgen deprivation and irradiation following radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether transient androgen deprivation improves outcome in patients irradiated after radical prostatectomy for locally advanced disease, persistent or rising postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), or local recurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records of 105 consecutive patients who were treated with pelvic irradiation after radical retropubic prostatectomy between August 1985 and December 1995 were reviewed. Seventy-four patients received radiation alone (mean follow up: 4.6 years), and 31 received transient androgen blockade with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (4) androgen receptor blocker (1) or both (24) beginning 2 months prior to irradiation (mean follow-up 3.0 years) for a mean duration of 6 months. Two of these patients were excluded from further analysis because they received hormonal therapy for more than 1 year. Patients received a prostatic fossa dose of 60-70 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction; 48 patients also received pelvic nodal irradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy. Survival, freedom from clinical relapse (FFCR), and freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Biochemical relapse was defined as two consecutive PSA measurements exceeding 0.07 ng/ml.

RESULTS

At 5 years after irradiation, actuarial survival for all patients was 92%, FFCR was 77%, and FFBR was 34%. FFBR was significantly better among patients who received transient androgen blockade before and during radiotherapy than among those treated with radiation alone (56 vs. 27% at 5 years, p = 0.004). FFCR was also superior for the combined treatment group (100 vs. 70% at 5 years, p = 0.014). Potential clinical prognostic factors before irradiation did not differ significantly between treatment groups, including tumor stage, summed Gleason histologic score, lymph node status, indication for treatment, and PSA levels before surgery or subsequent treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that transient androgen deprivation was the only significant predictor for biochemical failure.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of irradiation after radical prostatectomy suggests that transient androgen blockade and irradiation may improve freedom from early biochemical and clinically evident relapse compared to radiotherapy alone, although more prolonged follow-up will be needed to assess durability of impact upon clinical recurrence and survival rates.

Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) is a technique designed to deliver prescribed radiation doses to localized tumors with high precision, while effectively excluding the surrounding normal tissues. It facilitates tumor dose escalation which should overcome the relative resistance of tumor clonogens to conventional radiation dose levels. The present study was undertaken to test this hypothesis in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 743 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 3D-CRT. As part of a phase I study, the tumor target dose was increased from 64.8 to 81 Gy in increments of 5.4 Gy. Tumor response was evaluated by post-treatment decrease of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to levels of < or = 1.0 ng/ml and by sextant prostate biopsies performed > or = 2.5 years after completion of 3D-CRT. PSA relapse-free survival was used to evaluate long-term outcome. The median follow-up was 3 years (range: 1-7.6 years).

RESULTS

Induction of an initial clinical response was dose-dependent, with 90% of patients receiving 75.6 or 81.0 Gy achieving a PSA nadir < or = 1.0 ng compared with 76% and 56% for those treated with 70.2 Gy and 64.8 Gy, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival for patients with favorable prognostic indicators (stage T1-2, pretreatment PSA < or = 10.0 ng/ml and Gleason score < or = 6) was 85%, compared to 65% for those with intermediate prognosis (one of the prognostic indicators with a higher value) and 35% for the group with unfavorable prognosis (two or more indicators with higher values) (p < 0.001). PSA relapse-free survival was significantly improved in patients with intermediate and unfavorable prognosis receiving > or = 75.6 Gy (p < 0.05). A positive biopsy at > or = 2.5 years after 3D-CRT was observed in only 1/15 (7%) of patients receiving 81.0 Gy, compared with 12/25 (48%) after 75.6 Gy, 19/42 (45%) after 70.2 Gy, and 13/23 (57%) after 64.8 Gy (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The data provide evidence for a significant effect of dose escalation on the response of human prostate cancer to irradiation and defines new standards for curative radiotherapy in this disease.

A close or positive margin after mastectomy is not an indication for chest wall irradiation except in women aged fifty or younger

INTRODUCTION

Indications for postmastectomy radiation include primary tumor size > or = 5 cm and/or > or = 4 positive axillary nodes. In clinical practice, patients with a close or positive margin after mastectomy are also often treated with postmastectomy radiation. However, there is little data regarding the risk of a chest wall recurrence in patients with close or positive margins who otherwise would be considered low risk (tumor size <5 cm and/or 0-3 positive nodes). To address this issue, we assessed the risk of a chest wall recurrence in women with Stage I-II breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and were found to have primary tumor size <5 cm and 0-3 positive nodes with a close or positive deep margin.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The pathologic reports from 789 patients treated by mastectomy between 1985 and 1994 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 136 (17%) had tumor within 1 cm of the deep resection margin. The study population consists of 34 of these patients with close or positive margins whose primary tumor size was <5 cm with 0-3 positive axillary nodes and who received no postoperative radiation. The median age was 43 years (range 29-76). Of these, 44% had T1 tumors and 56% T2 tumors. Pathologic axillary nodal status was negative in 65% and positive in 35%. The median number of positive nodes was 1. The deep margin was positive in 2 patients, < or = 2 mm in 17 patients, 2.1-4 mm in 7 patients and 4.1-6 mm in 8 patients. Of the 34 patients, 67% received adjuvant chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen and 21% received tamoxifen alone. The median follow-up was 59 months (range 7-143).

RESULTS

There were 5 chest wall recurrences at a median interval of 26 months (range 7-127). One was an isolated first failure, one occurred concurrent with an axillary recurrence, and three were associated with distant metastases. The 5- and 8-year cumulative incidences of a chest wall recurrence were 9% and 18%. Patient age correlated with the cumulative incidence of chest wall recurrence at 8 years; age < or = 50 years had a rate of 28% vs. 0% for age >50 (p = 0.04). There was no correlation with chest wall failure and number of positive nodes, ER status, lymphovascular invasion, location of primary, grade, family history, or type of tumor close to the margin. Of 5 chest wall failures, 4 were in patients who had received adjuvant systemic chemotherapy +/- tamoxifen. Chest wall failures occurred in 1 patient with a positive deep margin, 3 patients with margins within 2 mm, and 1 patient with a margin of 5 mm. The estimated cumulative incidence probability of chest wall recurrence at 8 years by margin proximity was 24% < or = 2 mm vs. 7% 2.1-6 mm (p = 0.36), and by clinical size 24% for T2 tumors vs. 7% for T1 (p = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

A close or positive margin is uncommon (< or = 5%) after mastectomy in patients with tumor size <5 cm and 0-3 positive axillary nodes but, when present, it appears to be in a younger patient population. The subgroup of patients aged 50 or younger with clinical T1-T2 tumor size and 0-3 positive nodes who have a close (< or = 5 mm) or positive mastectomy margin are at high risk (28% at 8 years) for chest wall recurrence regardless of adjuvant systemic therapy and, therefore, should be considered for postmastectomy radiation.

[Localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: role of pelvic radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy]

Radical prostatectomy after pelvic lymphadenectomy is an effective treatment for patients with T1-2 pN0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. However, pathologic analysis of resected tissue reveals that in 20 to 40% of clinical stage B lesions, the tumour has extended locally beyond the prostate. This infra-clinical disease may be the origin of local relapse. Radiation oncologists are often asked to deliver post-operative irradiation. There is sufficient evidence in the literature that postoperative radiation therapy can improve local control rate for patients with pT3 pN0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate; however, the effect of this radiotherapy on survival in this category of patients remains unclear. It is the reason why randomised clinical trials have been implemented for investigating the role of pelvic external irradiation with respect to the effects on local control, acute and late morbidity, overall survival and cancer-related survival, and for better defining the selective indications of radiotherapy, regarding pathological data.

Radiation therapy after prostatectomy: now or later?

Patients with pathological stage T3 or T4 prostate cancers who have undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) have a substantial risk of recurrence. The first sign of recurrence is a rising PSA level, which precedes clinical evidence of failure by months to years. Adjuvant radiation therapy can significantly reduce the risk of failure in these patients. Patients with rising PSA levels after RRP can be salvaged with radiation therapy. Larger series report that between 30% and 54% of carefully staged patients can be salvaged with radiation therapy alone. It is possible that more patients may be salvaged in the future with the use of combined radiation therapy and hormonal therapy. Although one cannot be certain which approach-adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy- is better, studies are being performed that will help clarify this clinical dilemma.

Preirradiation PSA predicts biochemical disease-free survival in patients treated with postprostatectomy external beam irradiation

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical outcome and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and to determine prognostic factors for biochemical disease-free survival in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy without hormonal therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-eight patients were treated after prostatectomy with radiotherapy between March, 1988 and December, 1993. Seven patients had undetectable PSA (<0.2) and the remainder had detectable PSA at the time of irradiation (overall: median 2.7, range 0-24.9). Nine patients had biopsy proven local recurrence, palpable local disease, or positive preirradiation imaging. No patients received hormonal therapy prior to irradiation. Median follow-up was 55 months. A median dose of 60 Gy (range 58-66) was given to the prostate bed. Survival was analyzed using the life-table method. Actuarial biochemical disease-free survival was the primary endpoint studied.

RESULTS

In patients with detectable PSA, 51% had levels return to undetectable after irradiation. The actuarial 5-year freedom from biochemical failure for all patients was 24%. A significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival was seen for patients irradiated with preirradiation PSA that was undetectable (p < 0.001), or preirradiation PSA that was < or =2.7 (p = 0.002), vs. preirradiation PSA that was >2.7. Five-year actuarial biochemical disease-free survival values were 71, 48, and 0%, respectively, for the three groups. Biochemical disease-free survival was not affected by preoperative PSA level, clinical stage, Gleason's score, pathologic stage, surgical margins, presence of undetectable PSA after surgery, surgery to radiation interval, total dose, or presence of clinically suspicious local disease. Based on digital rectal exam, there were no local failures.

CONCLUSION

Biochemical disease-free survival after postprostatectomy radiation is predicted by the PSA at the time of irradiation. Clinical local control is excellent, but distant failure remains a significant problem in this population. The addition of concomitant systemic therapy should be investigated in patients with PSA >2.7.

Tolerance and early outcome results of postprostatectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has been associated with a reduction in acute and late toxicity among patients treated for localized prostatic cancer. The purpose of this study is to assess the acute and late toxicity of 3D-CRT delivered to patients in the postprostatectomy setting and to analyze which factors predict for durable biochemical control in this group of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1988 and 1994, 42 patients were treated after prostatectomy with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The median time from prostatectomy to radiotherapy was 11 months. Indications for treatment included a rising serum PSA level in 28 patients (65%) and positive surgical margins without a rising PSA level in 14 (35%). Twenty-five patients (60%) had pathologic stage T3 disease, and 32 (74%) had tumor at or close to the surgical margins. The median dose was 64.8 Gy, and the median follow-up time was 2 years.

RESULTS

3D-CRT in the postprostatectomy setting was well tolerated. Three patients (7%) experienced Grade II acute genitourinary toxicity and nine patients (21%) experienced Grade II acute gastrointestinal toxicity during treatment. No patient experienced Grade III or higher acute morbidity. The 2-year actuarial risk for Grade II late genitourinary and gastrointestinal late complications were 5 and 9%, respectively. In patients with existing incontinence, the incidence of worsening stress incontinence 6 months after treatment was 17%, which resolved within 12 months to its preradiotherapy level in four of six cases (66%). The overall 2-year postirradiation PSA relapse-free survival rate was 53%. The 2-year PSA relapse-free survival was 66% for patients with undetectable PSA levels in the immediate postoperative period compared to 26% for those with detectable levels of PSA after surgery (p < 0.006). Furthermore, for patients with preradiotherapy PSA levels of < or = 1.0 ng/ml, the 2-year PSA relapse-free survival was 74% compared to 17% of those with preradiotherapy PSA levels of > 1.0 ng/ml (p < 0.002). The resection margin status, presence of seminal vesicle involvement, Gleason score, and the preprostatectomy PSA level did not impact on PSA relapse-free survival. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that a preradiotherapy PSA value of > 1 ng/ml (p < 0.002) was the most important covariate predicting for a rising PSA after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

After prostatectomy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is associated with minimal treatment-related morbidity. Patients with postprostatectomy, preradiotherapy PSA levels < or = 1.0 ng/ml, and those patients who had undetectable PSA levels in the immediate postoperative period are more likely to benefit from local adjuvant therapy.

[Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: indications, results and side effects]

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy in locally progressed prostate carcinoma has become increasingly important in the last few years as both adjuvant therapy in patients with pT3-tumors with or without positive margins and treatment for a PSA increase in local recurrence of disease. The background for this is the knowledge gained by using PSA that up to 60% of the patients with histopathologically confirmed pT3/4 tumors or involvement of the lymph nodes are systemically and/or locally progressive after 3 to 5 years if only surgical or radiation therapy was performed.

RESULTS

A number of studies, albeit exclusively retrospective, substantiated a significantly high local tumor control by radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. This holds true for adjuvant therapy with a PSA in the "zero range" as well as with a PSA increase from the "zero range", whereby it must be taken into consideration that a certain percentage of treated patients with a PSA in the "zero-range" with or without positive margins actually do not need further therapy. Two retrospective studies demonstrated a significant better lengthening of "freedom from treatment failure" that is local and systemic progression of disease. Lengthening the survival time has, however, not yet been proven. With an increase in the PSA from the "zero range" after radical prostatectomy, there are indications that systemic metastatic spread already occurs with values higher than 2.5 to 4 ng/ml and the radiotherapy no longer has any curative intention.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT following radical prostatectomy gives better local control rates and probably better rates of "freedom from treatment failure" in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer with positive margins and probably in patients with negative margins. However, in retrospective studies no advantage in overall survival was shown.

Irradiation for locally recurrent carcinoma of the prostate following radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome of patients treated with irradiation (RT) for isolated, clinically apparent local tumor recurrence following prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate (CaP).

METHODS

Between May 1979 and July 1992, 35 patients received external-beam RT as sole salvage therapy for post-prostatectomy locally recurrent CaP. Patient outcome was evaluated through retrospective medical record review with respect to clinical and prostate-specific antigen-based (that is, biochemical) control rates, as well as disease-free (clinical and biochemical) and overall survival estimates. Chronic RT-induced morbidity was also examined, and pre-RT disease characteristics were evaluated for their association with disease outcome.

RESULTS

With median follow-up of 5.2 years (range 1.7 to 12.1) in survivors (30 patients), 19 patients (54%) had clinical (local, 1 patient [3%]; metastatic, 7 patients [20%]) or biochemical only (11 patients [31%]) relapse. The 8-year clinical relapse-free and any relapse-free (clinical or biochemical) rates were 80% and 56%, respectively, whereas the overall survival estimate was 97%. A chronic complication(s) of treatment was noted in 15 patients (43%) but spontaneously resolved in all but 6 (17%); persistent complications were mild and associated with rectal (grade 1 to 2, 14%) and lymphatic (3%) systems. The interval between prostatectomy and local tumor recurrence, the pre-RT prostate-specific antigen serum level, the pathologic stage, and tumor differentiation may be associated with disease outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

External-beam RT resulted in excellent local tumor control without serious long-term morbidity in most patients. Although this study could not define an optimal management strategy (for example, symptomatic measures only, RT, or hormonal therapy), these results provided outcome measures, in relationship to pre-RT tumor-related factors, that may be valuable for clinical decision-making.

Seminal vesicle biopsy: accuracy and implications for staging of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Seminal vesicle biopsy (SVB) is a new technique for detecting the spread of prostate cancer to the seminal vesicles. A comparison of findings following SVB in patients undergoing radiation therapy with pathologic findings following radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) was made to evaluate the accuracy of this test and its use in the staging of prostate cancer.

METHODS

Four hundred nine patients with clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland were evaluated for treatment: 222 patients underwent SVB prior to radiation therapy and 187 patients underwent RRP. Clinical stages in patients undergoing SVB included T1a (1 patient), T1b (4), T1c (35), T2a (49), T2b (96), and T2c (37); RRP clinical stages included T1b (3 patients), T1c (48), T2a (57), T2b (66), and T2c (13). The Gleason scores in patients undergoing SVB were 2 to 4 in 50 men, 5 to 6 in 110 men, and 7 and greater in 62 men; the Gleason scores in patients undergoing RRP were 2 to 4 in 53 men, 5 to 6 in 94 men, and 7 and greater in 40 men. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values ranged from 1.3 to 190 ng/mL (median 10.75) in men undergoing SVB and ranged from 0.5 to 140.6 ng/mL (median 9.0) in men undergoing RRP.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of seminal vesicle involvement as determined by the two techniques was the same. Seminal vesicle involvement was found in 33 of 222 patients (15%) undergoing SVB and in 27 of 187 (14%), of the RRP specimens (P = 0.9). When the two groups were further divided by three prognostic categories (clinical stage, PSA level, and grade), there was no difference in the incidence of seminal vesicle involvement between the two methods, except in the patients with Gleason score of 4 or less. In these patients, 5 of 53 (9%) had seminal vesicle involvement in the RRP group, compared with none of the 50 men in the SVB group (P = 0.02). Disease that was not organ confined was found in 69 of 187 prostatectomy specimens (37%). Of these patients, 27 of 69 (39%) had seminal vesicle involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

SVB is an accurate method of detecting seminal vesicle invasion based on comparisons with radical prostatectomy findings. Its importance lies in its ability to detect a large percentage of patients with non-organ-confined disease and in its use in modifying treatment planning accordingly.

Monoclonal antibody imaging of occult prostate cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen. Positron emission tomography and biopsy correlation

The utility of monoclonal antibody (MAb) imaging for detection of occult recurrent prostate cancer was investigated in 14 patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen at least 3 months after therapy. All were imaged with capromab pendetide (CYT-356) and subsequently had biopsies of the prostate bed. Ten also had PET scans with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Ten MAb scans were positive for tumor in the prostate bed and eight showed lymph node metastases. Six of the seven patients with positive biopsies had positive MAb scans, one had a negative scan. Three of the seven patients with negative biopsies had negative MAb scans, four had positive scans. Of the six patients with positive biopsies who had PET scans, one was positive, five were negative. Two of four patients with negative biopsies had negative positron emission tomography scans, two were positive. MAb imaging is superior to PET scan for identifying recurrent disease in the prostate bed. Assuming no false-negative biopsies, the positive predictive values for MAb and PET scan are 60% and 33%, negative predictive values are 75% and 29% and sensitivities are 86% and 17%. Additional investigation is necessary to determine if MAb uptake in lymph nodes is predictive of metastatic disease.

Microvascular invasion of the seminal vesicles in adenocarcinoma of the prostate

The objective of this article is to determine the relationship between microvascular invasion and seminal vesicle invasion in prostatic adenocarcinoma. Radical prostatectomies with seminal vesicle involvement were examined histologically and immunohistochemically with antibodies directed against S-100 protein and factor VIII. Microvascular invasion of the seminal vesicles showed a positive correlation with microvascular and capsular invasion of the prostate (P = 0.006 and 0.048, respectively) and lymph node metastases. Tumor progression was found in 8 of 14 (57%) patients with microvascular invasion of the seminal vesicles, compared with 3 of 22 (14%) without microvascular invasion (P = 0.001). Microvascular invasion of the seminal vesicles is predictive of tumor progression and lymph node metastases in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Evaluation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels after postoperative radiation therapy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze freedom from progression of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients who have received radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer.

DESIGN

We assessed the freedom from PSA progression after postoperative radiation therapy and its relationship to several potential prognostic factors during a median follow- up of 43 months.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty Mayo patients received postoperative radiation therapy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer between January 1988 and April 1993. Radiation therapy was initiated within 6 months after prostatectomy. Radiation doses ranged from 60 to 67 Gy.

RESULTS

"Freedom from PSA failure" was defined as the actuarial risk of maintaining a serum PSA level at 0.3 ng/mL or less. The freedom from failure rate was 66% at 3 and 4 years. Prognostic factors significantly associated with an improved freedom from failure were a pre-radiation PSA level of 1.0 ng/mL or less and no seminal vesicle involvement. A trend toward an improved freedom from failure was noted in patients with low-grade (1 and 2) tumors in comparison with high-grade (3 and 4) tumors. Treatment-related morbidity was minimal.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer seems to provide an improved freedom from PSA failure in comparison with that noted in other series of similar patients treated with radical prostatectomy only.

Predicting the need for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients receiving postprostatectomy irradiation

OBJECTIVES

This study was initiated to determine if clinical, pathologic, or biochemical variables available in patients receiving postprostatectomy irradiation could be predictive of treatment outcomes, including the need for subsequent systemic therapy.

METHODS

Between January 1992 and January 1995, 50 patients received external beam irradiation for a nonzero or rising postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. The median PSA values preoperatively and preradiation were 24 and 2.7 ng/mL, respectively. At the time of treatment, no patient had evidence of disseminated disease. The patients received a combination of axial and noncoplanar irradiation to an average total dose of 65 Gy at 1.8 Gy fractions. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify factors predictive of outcome.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourinary complications. A decline in the serum PSA during irradiation occurred in 82% of the patients. During radiation, 13 patients (26%) had a complete response (PSA less than 0.05 ng/mL), 56% had a partial response, and 18% had a rise in their PSA level. With a median follow-up of 16 months, 50% of all patients have an undetectable level of PSA. Twenty-six percent of patients have had evidence of biochemical progression. Seventeen percent of responding patients and 67% of nonresponders have evidence of progression (P= 0.002). On univariate analysis, other significant prognostic factors included clinical stage (P < 0.01), the preradiation PSA level (P < 0.05), and N stage (P < 0.01). On stepwise multivariate logistic analysis, a predictive model was generated from which treatment outcome could be predicted with 80% accuracy (percent correct classification) and an 85% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of patients with an elevated postprostatectomy PSA level who receive irradiation can be accurately predicted using a combination of clinical stage, preradiation PSA value, Gleason score, and the response to treatment. In this way, patients who do not require additional treatment (that is, hormonal) will avoid the unnecessary cost and toxicity.