Prostate-specific antigen as a prognostic factor for prostate cancer treated by external beam radiotherapy

Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men in the UK. Prostate-specific antigen testing followed by biopsy leads to overdetection, overtreatment as well as undertreatment of the disease. Evidence of treatment effectiveness has lacked because of the paucity of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional treatments for localised prostate cancer (active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy) in men aged 50-69 years.

DESIGN

A prospective, multicentre prostate-specific antigen testing programme followed by a randomised trial of treatment, with a comprehensive cohort follow-up.

SETTING

Prostate-specific antigen testing in primary care and treatment in nine urology departments in the UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Between 2001 and 2009, 228,966 men aged 50-69 years received an invitation to attend an appointment for information about the Prostate testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study and a prostate-specific antigen test; 82,429 men were tested, 2664 were diagnosed with localised prostate cancer, 1643 agreed to randomisation to active monitoring (n = 545), radical prostatectomy (n = 553) or radical radiotherapy (n = 545) and 997 chose a treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions were active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy.

TRIAL PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Definite or probable disease-specific mortality at the 10-year median follow-up in randomised participants.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall mortality, metastases, disease progression, treatment complications, resource utilisation and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for 17 prostate cancer-specific (p = 0.48) and 169 all-cause (p = 0.87) deaths. Eight men died of prostate cancer in the active monitoring group (1.5 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.0); five died of prostate cancer in the radical prostatectomy group (0.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.4 to 2.2 per 1000 person years) and four died of prostate cancer in the radical radiotherapy group (0.7 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 2.0 per 1000 person years). More men developed metastases in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring, n = 33 (6.3 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 4.5 to 8.8); radical prostatectomy, n = 13 (2.4 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.2 per 1000 person years); and radical radiotherapy, n = 16 (3.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 4.9 per 1000 person-years; p = 0.004). There were higher rates of disease progression in the active monitoring group than in the radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy groups: active monitoring (n = 112; 22.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 19.0 to 27.5 per 1000 person years); radical prostatectomy (n = 46; 8.9 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 11.9 per 1000 person-years); and radical radiotherapy (n = 46; 9.0 per 1000 person-years, 95% confidence interval 6.7 to 12.0 per 1000 person years; p < 0.001). Radical prostatectomy had the greatest impact on sexual function/urinary continence and remained worse than radical radiotherapy and active monitoring. Radical radiotherapy's impact on sexual function was greatest at 6 months, but recovered somewhat in the majority of participants. Sexual and urinary function gradually declined in the active monitoring group. Bowel function was worse with radical radiotherapy at 6 months, but it recovered with the exception of bloody stools. Urinary voiding and nocturia worsened in the radical radiotherapy group at 6 months but recovered. Condition-specific quality-of-life effects mirrored functional changes. No differences in anxiety/depression or generic or cancer-related quality of life were found. At the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the probabilities that each arm was the most cost-effective option were 58% (radical radiotherapy), 32% (active monitoring) and 10% (radical prostatectomy).

LIMITATIONS

A single prostate-specific antigen test and transrectal ultrasound biopsies were used. There were very few non-white men in the trial. The majority of men had low- and intermediate-risk disease. Longer follow-up is needed.

CONCLUSIONS

At a median follow-up point of 10 years, prostate cancer-specific mortality was low, irrespective of the assigned treatment. Radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy reduced disease progression and metastases, but with side effects. Further work is needed to follow up participants at a median of 15 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20141297.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 37. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.

The ProtecT trial: analysis of the patient cohort, baseline risk stratification and disease progression

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that the baseline clinico-pathological features of the men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) included in the ProtecT (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment) trial who progressed (n = 198) at a 10-year median follow-up were different from those of men with stable disease (n = 1409).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We stratified the study participants at baseline according to risk of progression using clinical disease stage, pathological grade and PSA level, using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The findings showed that 34% of participants (n = 505) had intermediate- or high-risk PCa, and 66% (n = 973) had low-risk PCa. Of 198 participants who progressed, 101 (51%) had baseline International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group 1, 59 (30%) Grade Group 2, and 38 (19%) Grade Group 3 PCa, compared with 79%, 17% and 5%, respectively, for 1409 participants without progression (P < 0.001). In participants with progression, 38% and 62% had baseline low- and intermediate-/high-risk disease, compared with 69% and 31% of participants with stable disease (P < 0.001). Treatment received, age (65-69 vs 50-64 years), PSA level, Grade Group, clinical stage, risk group, number of positive cores, tumour length and perineural invasion were associated with time to progression (P ≤ 0.005). Men progressing after surgery (n = 19) were more likely to have a higher Grade Group and pathological stage at surgery, larger tumours, lymph node involvement and positive margins.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate that one-third of the ProtecT cohort consists of people with intermediate-/high-risk disease, and the outcomes data at an average of 10 years' follow-up are generalizable beyond men with low-risk PCa.

Virtual HDR CyberKnife SBRT for Localized Prostatic Carcinoma: 5-Year Disease-Free Survival and Toxicity Observations

PURPOSE

Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may substantially recapitulate the dose distribution of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, representing an externally delivered "Virtual HDR" treatment method. Herein, we present 5-year outcomes from a cohort of consecutively treated virtual HDR SBRT prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients were treated from 2006 to 2009, 40 low-risk, and 39 intermediate-risk, under IRB-approved clinical trial, to 38 Gy in four fractions. The planning target volume (PTV) included prostate plus a 2-mm volume expansion in all directions, with selective use of a 5-mm prostate-to-PTV expansion and proximal seminal vesicle coverage in intermediate-risk patients, to better cover potential extraprostatic disease; rectal PTV margin reduced to zero in all cases. The prescription dose covered >95% of the PTV (V100 ≥95%), with a minimum 150% PTV dose escalation to create "HDR-like" PTV dose distribution.

RESULTS

Median pre-SBRT PSA level of 5.6 ng/mL decreased to 0.05 ng/mL 5 years out and 0.02 ng/mL 6 years out. At least one PSA bounce was seen in 55 patients (70%) but only 3 of them subsequently relapsed, biochemical-relapse-free survival was 100 and 92% for low-risk and intermediate-risk patients, respectively, by ASTRO definition (98 and 92% by Phoenix definition). Local relapse did not occur, distant metastasis-free survival was 100 and 95% by risk-group, and disease-specific survival was 100%. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicity incidence was 10 and 9%, respectively; with 6% late grade 3 GU toxicity. Acute urinary retention did not occur. Acute and late grade 2 GI toxicity was 0 and 1%, respectively, with no grade 3 or higher toxicity. Of patient's potent pre-SBRT, 65% remained so at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Virtual HDR prostate SBRT creates a very low PSA nadir, a high rate of 5-year disease-free survival and an acceptable toxicity incidence, with results closely resembling those reported post-HDR brachytherapy.

The dilemma of a rising prostate-specific antigen level after local therapy: what are our options?

Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumor diagnosed in men in the United States and Western Europe. Primary treatment with radiation or surgery is largely successful at controlling localized disease. However, a significant number (up to one third of men) may develop biochemical recurrence (BR), defined as a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. A general presumption is that BR will lead to overt progression in patients over subsequent years. There are a number of factors that a physician must consider when counseling and recommending treatment to a patient with a rising PSA. These include the following (1) various PSA-based definitions of BR; (2) source of PSA (ie, local or distant disease, residual benign prostate); (3) available modalities to treat the disease with the least morbidity; and (4) timing of therapy. In this article we review the current and future factors that clinicians should consider in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent prostate cancer.

Management of biochemical recurrence after primary localized therapy for prostate cancer

Clinically localized prostate cancer is typically managed by well established therapies like radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, and external beam radiation therapy. While many patients can be cured with definitive local therapy, some will have biochemical recurrence (BCR) of disease detected by a rising serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Management of these patients is nuanced and controversial. The natural history indicates that a majority of patients with BCR will not die from prostate cancer but from other causes. Despite this, a vast majority of patients with BCR are empirically treated with non-curable systemic androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), with its myriad of real and potential side effects. In this review article, we examined the very definition of BCR after definitive local therapy, the current status of imaging studies in its evaluation, the need for additional therapies, and the factors involved in the decision making in the choice of additional therapies. This review aims to help clinicians with the management of patients with BCR. The assessment of prognostic factors including absolute PSA level, time to recurrence, PSA kinetics, multivariable nomograms, imaging, and biopsy of the prostatic bed may help stratify the patients into localized or systemic recurrence. Patients with low-risk of systemic disease may be cured by a salvage local therapy, while those with higher risk of systemic disease may be offered the option of ADT or a clinical trial. An algorithm incorporating these factors is presented.

Prognostic factors in prostate cancer

Prognostic factors in organ confined prostate cancer will reflect survival after surgical radical prostatectomy. Gleason score, tumour volume, surgical margins and Ki-67 index have the most significant prognosticators. Also the origins from the transitional zone, p53 status in cancer tissue, stage, and aneuploidy have shown prognostic significance. Progression-associated features include Gleason score, stage, and capsular invasion, but PSA is also highly significant. Progression can also be predicted with biological markers (E-cadherin, microvessel density, and aneuploidy) with high level of significance. Other prognostic features of clinical or PSA-associated progression include age, IGF-1, p27, and Ki-67. In patients who were treated with radiotherapy the survival was potentially predictable with age, race and p53, but available research on other markers is limited. The most significant published survival-associated prognosticators of prostate cancer with extension outside prostate are microvessel density and total blood PSA. However, survival can potentially be predicted by other markers like androgen receptor, and Ki-67-positive cell fraction. In advanced prostate cancer nuclear morphometry and Gleason score are the most highly significant progression-associated prognosticators. In conclusion, Gleason score, capsular invasion, blood PSA, stage, and aneuploidy are the best markers of progression in organ confined disease. Other biological markers are less important. In advanced disease Gleason score and nuclear morphometry can be used as predictors of progression. Compound prognostic factors based on combinations of single prognosticators, or on gene expression profiles (tested by DNA arrays) are promising, but clinically relevant data is still lacking.

Gene therapy strategies to improve the effectiveness of cancer radiotherapy

Having the ability to alter the genetic makeup of a cancer cell by gene transfer is a potentially powerful strategy for treating human cancer. However, a low efficiency of gene delivery in vivo and poor tumour specificity has prevented the widespread implementation of this technology in the clinic. Despite these formidable obstacles, the first successful application of gene therapy in the treatment of cancer may occur when it is combined with local modalities such as radiation therapy. A small number of gene therapy strategies have been evaluated in clinical trials in combination with external beam radiation therapy. The combined therapy has been well-tolerated and has not exacerbated the side effects of radiation therapy. Gene transfer and tumour cell destruction has been demonstrated in vivo. Although the results await confirmation in larger, prospective Phase III trials, there is suggestive evidence that the combined therapies may be demonstrating better than expected antitumour activity. Our vast knowledge of the molecular defects that drive the cancer process, coupled with our expanding understanding of the genes responsible for tumour cell radioresistance, have spawned the development of rational, targeted gene therapies designed to increase tumour cell radiosensitivity. Here, the results of the clinical trials conducted so far will be reviewed, followed by a description of new approaches under development at present.

Iodine-125 brachytherapy for prostate cancer: First published Australian experience

With the emergence of new imaging and implant techniques, prostate brachytherapy has become increasingly popular over the last decade. Brachytherapy promises to deliver twice the biologically effective dose as conventional external beam treatments without increasing the dose to tissues surrounding the prostate. However, there are few or no published Australian series of its efficacy in the clinic. We present the experience of one of the first centres in Australia to offer this service to its patients: a series from Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital in Western Australia. We present data on the efficacy of brachytherapy in maintaining prostate specific antigen levels, as well as the rate of urinary, rectal and sexual complications. Our results compare favourably with other brachytherapy and external beam treatment series. We believe that with the increasing trend towards dose escalation and novel therapies, standardized measurements of success and failure need to be better defined, and that randomized trials comparing modalities are needed to improve the management of prostate cancer.

Early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics following prostate carcinoma radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The goal of the current study was to analyze the prognostic value of early prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics, with PSA assessed as reaching or failing to reach discrete threshold values at fixed time points during follow-up after external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of PSA follow-up for 839 patients treated between May 1987 and December 2000 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (Cleveland, OH). They also assessed the impact on bRFS of PSA levels lower than defined threshold values at given time points during follow-up.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 24-189 months), 540 patients (64.4%) maintained bRFS, whereas 299 patients (35.6%) did not maintain bRFS. The median nadir among patients with sustained bRFS was 0.4 ng/mL, with a median time to nadir of 28.9 months. Patients who did not maintain bRFS reached a median nadir of 1.3 ng/mL at a median of 15 months (P < 0.0001 for both nadir level and time to nadir). Reaching PSA thresholds of 3.0, 2.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.2 ng/mL at any time during follow-up was correlated with improved bRFS (P < 0.0001, each threshold). Patients whose PSA levels crossed the appropriate thresholds within 3 and 6 months of follow-up, irrespective of the time or level of eventual nadir, exhibited significantly improved bRFS when compared with patients whose PSA levels reached those thresholds at any time during follow-up and patients whose PSA levels never reached those thresholds (all thresholds: P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite previous conclusions that early PSA assessment may lack prognostic value, the data obtained in the current study suggest that the kinetics of early PSA decline is predictive of long-term bRFS when assessed using a time-and-PSA threshold model. After EBRT for prostate carcinoma, PSA levels below various discrete PSA thresholds were indicative of statistically meaningful long-term outcome differences between experimental arms as early as 90 days after radiotherapy. If the time-and-PSA threshold model is shown to be predictive of prostate carcinoma mortality as well, then it may allow the scientific community to evaluate promising treatment concepts and technologies at a highly accelerated pace.

Prostate biopsy status and PSA nadir level as early surrogates for treatment failure: analysis of a prostate cancer randomized radiation dose escalation trial

PURPOSE

A positive biopsy after external beam radiotherapy in patients free of any evidence of treatment failure is not synonymous with eventual recurrence. Although biopsy positivity is a predictor of outcome, the utility of biopsy status as a surrogate end point, the effect of radiation dose on biopsy status, and the interrelationships of these associations to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir level are not well-defined. These issues were investigated in a cohort of men with Stage T1-T3 prostate cancer who were randomized to receive between 70 Gy and 78 Gy and were prospectively biopsied at about 2 years after the completion of radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Of the 301 assessable patients in the trial, 168 underwent planned sextant or greater prostate post-RT biopsies in the absence of biochemical or clinical failure; this group constituted the study cohort. Of the 168 patients, 87 were in the 70-Gy arm and 81 in the 78-Gy arm. Biopsies were classified into four groups: negative (no tumor), atypical/suspicious cells (not diagnostic of carcinoma), carcinoma with treatment effect (CaTxEffect), and carcinoma without treatment effect (CaNoTxEffect). Any diagnosis of carcinoma in the specimen was classified as biopsy positive. Freedom from failure (FFF) included biochemical failure and/or clinical failure. Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated from the completion of RT. For those alive in the study cohort, the median follow-up was 65 months.

RESULTS

The rate of biopsy without tumor was 42%; with atypical cells, it was 28%, with CaTxEffect 21%, and with CaNoTxEffect 9%. The overall biopsy positivity rate (CaTxEffect + CaNoTxEffect) was 30%; 28% in the 70-Gy group and 32% in the 78-Gy group (p = 0.52). The distribution of PSA nadir levels was 73% <or=0.5, 20% >0.5-1.0, 5% >1.0-2.0, and 1% >2.0 ng/mL. Significantly more patients randomized to 78 Gy had a PSA nadir of <or=0.5 ng/mL (80% vs. 67%; p = 0.02). No relationship was found between PSA nadir level and prostate biopsy status. The 5-year FFF rate for those classified as biopsy negative was 84% and for those biopsy positive was 60% (p = 0.0002). Radiation dose did not significantly alter FFF rates by prostate biopsy status. Nadir PSA level correlated with FFF, although this was dependent on the inclusion of the 2 patients with a PSA nadir >2.0 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

For patients free of treatment failure at the time of prostate biopsy 2 years after RT, the prognosis of no tumor cells was the same as that of atypical/suspicious cells and CaTxEffect was the same as CaNoTxEffect. The biopsy positivity rate was not altered by dose, suggesting that most of the outcome differences between the 70-Gy and 78-Gy groups were due to events occurring before prostate biopsy at 2 years and/or were not entirely dependent on biopsy status. Biopsy status is a strong prognostic factor, but, as an early end point, it may be misleading. PSA nadir appears to have little clinical value in patients treated to doses of >/=70 Gy who are failure free 2 years after RT.

Preliminary toxicity and prostate-specific antigen response of a Phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, 103Pd brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer•

PURPOSE

Standard therapies for locally advanced prostate cancer have resulted in suboptimal disease control rates. A Phase I/II trial was designed for patients with positive seminal vesicle biopsies, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >15 ng/ml, Gleason score > or =8 or clinical classification T2c-T3 to improve local control and to test the tolerance of the prostate to high-dose radiation by using neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, 103Pd brachytherapy, and conformal three-dimensional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). This article outlines treatment-related morbidity and PSA response to this regimen and analyzes the effect of escalating doses of brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forth-three patients with T1c-T3 prostate cancer were enrolled in a Phase I/II trial from March 1994 through September 1997. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 64 months (median, 32 months). Pretreatment PSA ranged from 2.1 to 202 ng/ml (median, 16 ng/ml). Seventy-seven percent (33 of 43) of patients had high-grade tumors (score > or =7). Seventy-four percent (32 of 43) had stage > or =T2c. A total of 21 (49%) patients had positive seminal vesicle biopsies. Treatment consisted of hormonal therapy for 3 months with leuprolide and flutamide followed by a 103Pd implant and, 2 months later, 59.4 Gy of three-dimensional EBRT. Hormonal therapy was continued for 9 months. The planned 103Pd dose was escalated from 57 Gy (13 patients) to 77 Gy (13 patients) to 86 Gy (17 patients).

RESULTS

The actuarial freedom from PSA failure (PSA>0.5 ng/ml) at 4 years was 74%. There were no significant differences found when analyzing patients by presenting PSA or seminal vesicle status. There was a trend toward improved outcome with higher doses delivered to the prostate via the implant. Patients receiving doses > or =65 Gy (31 patients) had a freedom from PSA failure rate at 4 years of 89.5%, compared with 52.5% for those receiving doses <65 Gy (10 patients; p=0.08). The last PSA values for those patients free from PSA failure were < or =0.1 ng/ml in 25 (69%), >0.1-0.2 ng/ml in 5 (14%), and >0.2-0.5 ng/ml in 6 (17%). The actuarial freedom from developing Grade 2 proctitis was 75% at 4 years. There was a trend toward increased proctitis with increasing prostate implant doses. Patients with doses < or =70 Gy (n=12) had a 92% freedom from Grade 2 proctitis compared with 67.5% for those with doses delivered to 90% of the gland from a dose-volume histogram of >70 Gy (n=29) (p=0.15). There were no cases of Grade 3 or 4 proctitis. The 3-year actuarial preservation of sexual potency rate was 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results from this regimen show an improvement in PSA control for this group of locally advanced prostate cancer patients over more standard therapies. To maximize control while minimizing toxicity, doses of 65-70 Gy of 103Pd should be used when 59.4 Gy of three-dimensional EBRT is delivered. Longer follow-up will be needed to further substantiate these findings.

Conventional external-beam radiation therapy alone or with androgen ablation for clinical stage III (T3, NX/N0, M0) adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of clinical Stage III (T3, N0/NX, M0) prostate cancer treated by conventional radiation alone or with adjuvant androgen ablation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Three hundred forty-four men with T3, N0/NX, M0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who received conventional radiation alone (260) or with androgen ablation (84) were analyzed for relapse or rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA), using univariate and multivariate techniques.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 68 months, the 260 men treated with radiation alone had a 10-year actuarial rate of relapse or rising PSA of 76%. Pretreatment PSA level (< or = 10 ng/ml vs. > 10 < or = 20 ng/ml vs. > 20 ng/ml) and radiation dose (< 68 Gy vs. > or = 68 Gy) were the only independently significant determinants of biochemical failure; Gleason score (2-7 vs. 8-10) was an additional determinant of metastatic relapse. Patients treated to doses < 68 Gy experienced 6-year failure rates exceeding 50% regardless of PSA level. Patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/ml and receiving 68-70 Gy had a 6-year failure of 24%, but those with PSA > 10 ng/ml had relapse rates exceeding 50% even at doses of 70 Gy. At a median follow-up of 44 months, the 84 patients treated with radiation and androgen ablation had a 6-year biochemical failure rate of 22%. The only significant determinant of outcome in this group was pretreatment PSA; patients with PSA < or = 80 ng/ml had a 6-year failure rate of only 12% compared to a failure rate of 53% for those with PSA > 80 ng/ml. The outcome for those treated with combined modalities was significantly better than for those treated with radiation alone in all PSA strata.

CONCLUSION

Conventional radiation alone has little curative potential for Stage III disease. Doses < 68 Gy are particularly ineffective. Patients with PSA < or = 10 ng/ml may be candidates for conventional radiation to a dose of 70 Gy. Other patients are probably best served by combined radiation-androgen ablation or high-dose conformal radiation.

Familial prostate cancer: outcome following radiation therapy with or without adjuvant androgen ablation

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of familial versus sporadic prostate carcinoma after definitive external radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1987 and 1996, 1214 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (T1-T4, N0/NX, M0) received definitive radiation therapy in our department. By retrospective review of charts and questioning of patients, a record on the presence or absence of prostate cancer in a first degree relative was obtained in 1164 men. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed on these cases with relapse or rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA), local recurrence, metastasis, and survival as endpoints.

RESULTS

Familiar prostate cancer was present in 148 of 1164 men (13%). Men with familial disease were slightly but significantly younger (mean 66 years) at diagnosis than those with sporadic disease (mean 68 years) (p = 0.02). Apart from this there were no significant differences between the two groups in T-stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA levels, DNA ploidy, or serum testosterone levels. There were no significant differences in treatment parameters including radiation dose and the use of adjuvant androgen ablation. With a median follow-up of 42 months, there was no difference in freedom from relapse or rising PSA at 6 years between those with a family history (54%) and those without a family history (58%) (p = 0.171). Likewise there was no difference between the two groups when local recurrence or metastasis was the endpoint. Multiple subgroup analyses (younger and older; T1/T2 and T3; low Gleason and high Gleason; no androgen ablation and androgen ablation; race) failed to reveal any differences in outcome in any category between familial and sporadic disease. Among patients with a rising post-treatment PSA profile, PSA doubling times were similar in those with sporadic and familial disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides no evidence for any substantial difference between familial and sporadic prostate cancer either in clinicopathological features, in response to treatment, or in ultimate outcome.

The current status of adjuvant hormonal therapy combined with radiation therapy for localised prostate cancer

Analysis of the results of treatment of localised prostate cancer with radiation and surgery has identified patients who are at high risk of developing metastatic dissemination. High histologic grade, serum prostate specific antigen above 20 ng/ml, extension beyond the capsule of the prostate, and involvement of lymph nodes are highly predictive of metastatic risk. Antiandrogen therapy has high rates of activity in the treatment of overt metastatic disease prompting its assessment as an adjuvant treatment added to radiation therapy. There are now major prospective randomized trials which have been completed. The current evidence indicates that a large survival benefit ensues when antiandrogen therapy is added to radiation for appropriately selected patients. This adjuvant approach is likely to become the standard of care. Strategies for further enhancement of adjuvant therapy are discussed.

[Treatment of A2-B2 prostatic cancer: results of a hormonoradiotherapy combination in the PSA era]

PURPOSE

Prospective analysis of results of combined neoadjuvant hormonetherapy and external beam radiation therapy in A2-B2 prostate adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1986 and 1994, 36 patients with clinical stage A2 (five patients), B1 (12 patients) and B2 (19 patients) N0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate declined for radical surgery, underwent a brief neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before external beam radiotherapy at our radiation therapy department. They all had a PSA determination before the combined treatment and no evidence of local extension or metastatic spread. They were followed clinically and with serial PSA levels for a median time of 58 months. Relapse was defined by a PSA level > or = 2.5 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Median pre-treatment PSA level was 16.5 ng/mL; 16 patients had less than 15 ng/mL. Combined treatment was very well tolerated. After 3 months of neoadjuvant hormonetherapy, digital rectal examination was normalized in 27 cases with a PSA value < or = 1 ng/mL in 23. Only four tumors have relapsed (one local failure, two metastases and one PSA failure). The single factor that predicted biochemical relapse was pre-treatment PSA level: the 5-year actuarial rate of PSA failure when PSA level < 15 ng/mL was 0% and 27.5% if it was > or = 15 ng/mL (p = 0.05). During follow-up, only two patients suffered grade 2 rectitis and seven complained a total impotency.

CONCLUSION

This limited study advocates hormonal neoadjuvant therapy and radiotherapy association in intracapsular prostatic carcinoma in patients declined for surgery or when pre-treatment PSA is above 15 ng/mL, with mild acute and late toxicity.

Factors that influence biochemical failure after radiation therapy for stage T1c prostate cancer

More patients are now being diagnosed with nonpalpable prostate cancer after a needle biopsy is performed for an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (stage T1c). The purpose of this study was to identify prognostic factors that are associated with biochemical failure after definitive external beam radiation therapy. This study included 75 patients with the diagnosis of T1c prostate cancer who were referred to four radiation oncology centers in the West Chicago area from 1992 to 1995. All patients were treated with megavoltage external beam radiotherapy to doses between 66 and 70 Gy. Biochemical failure was defined as three consecutive rising PSA values of at least 10% of the prior reading in posttreatment serial measurements. The mean age of the patients was 72 years. The mean follow-up was 1.7 years (range, 1-3 1/2 years). Of the 75 patients, 72 (96%) are clinically with no evidence of disease, three of the 75 are alive with disease, and 60 (80%) remain biochemically free of disease (bNED). The significant factors for bNED status were an initial PSA level of <15 ng/ml (p = 0.0001), achievement of a posttreatment nadir PSA level of < or = 1.5 ng/ml (p = 0.0001), and a Gleason score of <6 (p = 0.034). Multisextant involvement with tumor or bilobar disease was not significant. On multivariate analysis, an initial PSA level of <15 ng/ml (p = 0.0001), Gleason score of <6 (p = 0.02), and nadir PSA level of < or = 1.5 ng/ml (p = 0.03) were significant predictors of bNED survival. Men with T1c prostate cancer comprise a heterogeneous group. Patients with a high PSA level (>15 ng/ml) and high Gleason score (>6) are at increased risk for biochemical failure. Failure to achieve a posttreatment nadir PSA level of < or = 1.5 ng/ml is a predictor of ultimate biochemical failure.

Watchful waiting or watchful progression?: Prostate specific antigen doubling times and clinical behavior in patients with early untreated prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Prostate specific antigen doubling time (PSAdt) is a dynamic model of prostate tumor biology. It predicts aggressive disease and subsequent clinical recurrence after radical treatment. However, as yet there is only limited evidence for its validity in the watchful waiting population.

METHODS

One hundred and thirteen previously untreated patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate who were referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency for a management opinion subsequently were placed into a prospective watchful waiting program. The reasons for watchful waiting, previous medical history, serial PSA, and histopathologic data were recorded.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 75 years (range, 49-85 years). The median follow-up from the time of the first appointment was 14 months (range, 0-58 months). The reasons for watchful waiting were correlated highly with T classification (P = 0.003) and past medical history (P = 0.002). Approximately 40% of T1 patients and 51% of T2 patients had clinical progression by 2 years, increasing to 60% at 3 years. On multivariate analysis PSAdt strongly correlated with clinical progression (P < 0.0001), stage progression (P = 0.01), and time to treatment (P = 0.0001); tumor grade and initial stage were not found to be predictive for any of the endpoints studied. Initial PSA only was significant in predicting for time to treatment (P = 0.03). Approximately 50% of patients with a PSAdt of <18 months progressed within 6 months. At last follow-up, no deaths from prostate carcinoma had been recorded. Overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 92% and 68%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Using digital rectal examination, the findings of this study demonstrated high rates of clinical tumor progression within the watchful waiting population. PSAdt rather than standard histopathologic criteria was found to be the most powerful indicator of disease activity.

External beam radiotherapy dose response of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the external beam radiotherapy dose response of palpable Stage T1-T4, mostly Nx, patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

There were 938 men consecutively treated between 1987 and 1995 who had pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. Posttreatment failure was defined as disease recurrence and/or two elevations in PSA on consecutive follow-up visits. The radiotherapy technique consisted of a four-field box with a small four-field reduction after 46 Gy in 844 patients (total dose of 60-70 Gy) or with a six-field conformal boost after 46 Gy in 94 patients (total dose of 74-78 Gy). Neoadjuvant or adjuvant androgen ablation was not used in any patient. Median follow-up was 40 months.

RESULTS

The mean and median radiotherapy doses for the entire group were 67.8 +/- 13.3 Gy (+/-SEM) and 66 Gy. The mean radiotherapy dose was higher in those who had Stage T3/T4 disease, Gleason scores of 8-10, or pretreatment PSAs of > 4 ng/ml. In general, patients with more aggressive pretreatment prognostic features were treated to higher doses; yet, those that relapsed or had a rising PSA were treated to significantly lower doses. Actuarial analyses were facilitated by dividing patients into three dose groups: < or = 67, > 67-77, and > 77 Gy. The actuarial freedom from failure rates at 3 years were 61, 74, and 96% for the low, intermediate, and high dose groups. Stratification of the patients by pretreatment PSA revealed that dose was a significant correlate of freedom from relapse or a rising PSA for those with PSAs > 4-10, > 10-20, and > 20 ng/ml. The only patients in which an improvement in outcome was not related to higher doses were those with a pretreatment PSA < or = 4 ng/ml. Dose was significantly associated with freedom from failure for Stage T1/T2 and Stage T3/T4 patients, as well as for those stratified by Gleason score. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards models showed that dose was an independent and highly significant predictor of relapse or a rising PSA.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective review strongly indicates that radiotherapy dose to the prostate is critical to the cure of prostate cancer, even for favorable patients with pretreatment PSAs of > 4-10 ng/ml, Stages T1/T2, or Gleason scores of 2-6. Final confirmation awaits the results of our randomized trial.

Prostate specific antigen levels during radical radiation therapy and the prediction of outcome in localized carcinoma of the prostate

There has been substantial interest in the effect of radiation therapy upon serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients managed by radiation therapy and their ability to predict the eventual outcome. At our institute, an observational prospective longitudinal study was begun in 1989 to identify prognostic factors for biochemical relapse from among several variables, including PSA levels measured prior to treatment, during treatment, and post-treatment, and to summarize what happens to PSA levels over the course of treatment with radical radiation therapy. A total of 142 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1-4, N0, M0) were radically irradiated (6-7 weeks) between February 1989 and January 1991. Serum PSA levels were recorded weekly during radiation therapy in 117 patients. Of these 117, weekly PSA measurements ranged in completeness from 95 to 113 cases. A number of statistical tests were performed on the data with investigative/ exploratory intent. There were 60 biochemical relapses documented in the whole group of 142 patients, with a maximum follow-up of 4.6 years and median follow-up of 3.3 years. Of the candidate prognostic variables tested by univariate analysis, the following emerged as statistically significant (i.e. P < 0.05): each of the four pretreatment factors (absolute PSA value, dichotomous PSA (normal versus above normal), T category and Gleason score); the treatment variables namely, the end-of-treatment PSA, the slope of PSA, and the absolute change in PSA from pretreatment to the end of treatment; and, among post-treatment variables, the first follow-up PSA, the absolute change in PSA from pretreatment to first follow-up, and the return to normal of an above-normal pretreatment PSA by first follow-up. The majority of these factors were then subjected to multivariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression analyses. The end-of-treatment PSA and T category were consistently identified as independently statistically significant factors associated with biochemical relapse. The Gleason score was selected less consistently, and never when defined on a categorical scale. Therefore, using a Cox PH model with the variables of end-of-treatment PSA and T category, both defined on a categorical scale, we developed three prognostic groups with good, intermediate and poor prognoses (chi 2 TREND = 40.7; P < 0.0001). Their 3-year biochemical relapse-free rates, for example, were: 91%, (standard error (SE) 5%); 64% (SE 9%); and 24% (SE 6%), respectively. However, substitution of the baseline value of PSA, which was also strongly associated with outcome, and using the data from all 142 patients, provided similarly distinct prognostic groups (chi 2 TREND = 41.6; P < 0.0001), with corresponding 3-year relapse-free rates of: 92% (SE 4%); 79% (SE 7%); and 30% (SE 6%). Mean weekly PSA levels measured during treatment were found to have a negatively sloping or decreasing tendency. A statistically significant decrease in PSA occurred from pretreatment to the end of treatment (t116 = 7.5; P < 0.0001); the geometric mean of the ratio of end-of-treatment PSA to PSA at pretreatment was 0.7 (95% CI 0.6-0.8). The end-of-treatment PSA and T category emerged as independently statistically significant prognostic variables predicting biochemical relapse. Using the fitted Cox PH model with these two variables, three distinct prognostic groups were identified. The results using pretreatment PSA instead of end-of-treatment PSA produced similarly distinct prognostic groups. Mean weekly PSA levels measured during treatment exhibited a decreasing tendency, and a statistically significant decrease in PSa from pretreatment to the end of treatment was observed.

Analyzing predictive models following definitive radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

As we approach the 21st century, clinically useful predictive models for prostate carcinoma are urgently needed to stratify patients reliably for future treatment strategies. Recently, many investigators have developed models that employ prostate specific antigen (PSA)-based constructs or groupings in an attempt to predict outcome accurately following definitive radiotherapy. This investigation was conducted to determine which of these models provides the closest "fit" to independent clinical outcome data measuring biochemical freedom from failure (bNED control), thereby warranting further exploration.

METHODS

Six models were analyzed in a definitive radiotherapy series of 421 patients with localized prostate carcinoma treated with a median dose of 74 Gray (Gy) between March 1988 and November 1994. A stepwise Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed to predict for bNED control using the following covariates: PSA, Gleason's score, stage, dose, PSA density, and perineural invasion. Subsequent MVAs were performed for each model incorporating the new construct or prognostic groupings. The adequacy of the models was confirmed using plots of score residuals against time to bNED failure and comparisons were made used Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC) in which a smaller value corresponds to a statistically improved model based on explained variation and the number of predictors. Because PSA was distributed in a log-normal fashion in the current study population, the model-building process was duplicated using a logarithmic transformation analysis. Biochemical failure was defined as 2 consecutive elevations in the PSA > or = 1.5 ng/mL. The median follow-up time was 34 months (range, 2-87 months).

RESULTS

Initially, the model developed by Pisansky et al. appeared the most predictive due to the parsimony in their risk estimate, which is the sole predictor of outcome, as well as its associated lowest AIC value. However, after the logarithmic transformation analysis, all the models appeared to be equally predictive of bNED outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A plethora of accurate models for predicting outcome following definitive radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma recently have been engineered, all of which are essentially equally predictive in this data base (via a logarithmic conversion process). This analysis should be corroborated in other large radiotherapy series.

Interstitial implantation techniques in prostate cancer

Brachytherapy is a radiotherapeutic technique that allows the physician to implant radioactive isotopes into a body cavity or directly into tissue. Different radioisotopes have unique characteristics that the brachytherapist may utilize for a particular situation. The use of brachytherapy is part of standard radiation oncology practice in gynecological and head and neck cancer management. The prostate is approachable for interstitial implantation due to its close proximity to the perineum. Over 20 years ago, primitive methods of brachytherapy were utilized in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, poor results due to inconsistency in achieving adequate coverage of the entire prostate and poor patient selection caused this treatment modality to fall out of favor. Technological advances over the last decade have restored attention to brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Particularly important has been the development of transrectal ultrasound, new radioisotopes such as palladium-103, computer tomography, computerized dosimetry systems, and earlier diagnosis. Modern interstitial implantation utilizing transperineal template and transrectal ultrasound guidance has resulted in improved consistency in radiation dose delivery to the entire prostate. Early results are encouraging in terms of the relatively low morbidity of the procedure, improved local control rates, and biochemical progression free survival. This has resulted in an outpatient treatment that has high patient acceptance.

Interstitial iodine-125 radiation without adjuvant therapy in the treatment of clinically localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of iodine-125 interstitial radiation in the treatment of prostate carcinoma classified as T1 or T2.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (T1, 23%; T2, 77%) were treated with iodine-125 radionuclides between January 1, 1988, and December 31, 1990. Four patients died of intercurrent illness within 1 year postimplant, leaving 122 men in the study. The prescribed minimum radiation dose was 160 gray. Median follow-up was 69.3 months. Prebiopsy prostate specific antigen (PSA) values (median, 5.0 ng/mL) were available for all patients. Posttherapy evaluation included clinical, biochemical (PSA), and pathologic (repeat needle biopsy) studies. No patient was surgically staged, and none received androgen deprivation therapy. Morbidity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grading scale. Statistical appraisal was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. PSA failure was defined in two ways: (1) PSA progression, i.e., 2 consecutive increases from a nadir value; and (2) failure to attain an arbitrary serum PSA value of 1.0 or 0.5 ng/mL at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The overall 7-year survival was 77%; there were no deaths from prostate carcinoma in this cohort. The 7-year actuarial PSA progression free outcome was 89%, and the PSA < or = 1.0 ng/mL outcome was 87%. When PSA < or = 0.5 ng/mL was selected as an outcome end point, and PSA values in this series of radiation-treated patients were compared with PSA values proposed to indicate disease free survival after radical prostatectomy (PSA < or = 0.3-< or = 0.6 ng/mL), the 7-year actuarial disease free survival was 79%. Morbidity was minimal except in patients who had preimplant or postimplant transurethral prostate resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient-based iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma classified as T1 or T2 resulted in biochemical outcomes comparable to end points resulting from radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation.

Rate of PSA rise predicts metastatic versus local recurrence after definitive radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

A rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) following treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate indicates eventual clinical failure, but the rate of rise can be quite different from patient to patient, as can the pattern of clinical failure. We sought to determine whether the rate of PSA rise could differentiate future local versus metastatic failure.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two thousand six hundred sixty-seven PSA values from 400 patients treated with radiotherapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate were analyzed with respect to PSA patterns and clinical outcome. Patients had received no hormonal therapy or prostate surgery and had > 4 PSA values post-treatment. PSA rate of rise, determined by the slope of the natural log, was classified as gradual [< 0.69 log(ng/ml)/year, or doubling time (DT) > 1 year], moderate [0.69-1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT 6 months-1 year], or rapid [> 1.4 log(ng/ml)/year, or DT < 6 months].

RESULTS

Sixty-one percent of patients had non-rising PSA following treatment; 25% of patients with rising PSA developed clinical failure, and 93% of patients with clinical failure had rising PSA. The rate of rise discerned different clinical failure patterns. Local failure occurred in 23% of patients with moderate rate of rise versus 7% with gradual rise (p = 0.0001). Metastatic disease developed in 46% of those with rapid rise versus 8% with moderate rise (p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, in addition to rate of rise, PSA nadir and rate of decline predicted local failure; those with post-treatment nadir of 1-4 ng/ml were five times more likely to experience local failure than nadir < 1 ng/ml (p = 0.0002). Rapid rate of rise was the most significant independent predictor of metastatic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of PSA rise following definitive radiotherapy can predict clinical failure patterns, with a rapidly rising PSA indicating metastatic recurrence and moderately rising PSA local recurrence. This information could potentially direct therapy; if the rise predicts metastatic failure hormonal therapy could be considered, while aggressive salvage therapy may benefit subclinical local recurrence identified by a moderate rate of PSA rise.

Early stage prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy: stratifying an intermediate risk group

PURPOSE

This study identifies two early prostate cancer populations within the T1/T2AB, Gleason 2-7, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) 4-15 ng/ml grouping. By demonstrating different outcomes we may be able to more appropriately select a subgroup for whom adjuvant therapy trials or altered treatment techniques are indicated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred forty-six patients with T1/T2AB, Gleason score 2-7, PSA 4-15 ng/ml prostate cancer were treated with external beam radiotherapy alone from November 1987 to October 1993. The median pretreatment PSA was 8.6 and the mean 8.7. Minimum follow-up was 2 years with a median of 38 months (mean 42 months, range 24-87). The median age was 70 years (range 58-83) and the median central axis dose delivered was 7240 cGy (mean 7273, range 6541-7895 cGy). Eleven patients received conventional radiotherapy while 135 were treated using conformal techniques. As there is evidence that a low PSA nadir is an early marker for long term biochemical control, time to post treatment PSA < 1 ng/ml was actuarially analyzed by Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, radiation dose, stage, and the presence of perineural invasion. Pretreatment PSA was the only patient characteristic predictive of achieving a PSA level < 1.0 ng/ml. Biochemical relapse free (bNED) control (non rising PSA) was then compared for patients above and below the approximate median pretreatment PSA level of 8 ng/ml. bNED control rates and the time to PSA < 1.0 ng/ml were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, and differences in bNED control and PSA < 1.0 ng/ml according to PSA level were evaluated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Results from actuarial analysis revealed that pretreatment PSA was the only significant variable predictive of a PSA < 1.0 ng/ml. Ninety-eight percent of patients with pretreatment PSA < 8 achieved a PSA level < 1.0 ng/ml within 3 years compared to 78% for patients with a PSA > 8 ng/ml (p = 0.0003). bNED control for the two groups separated at a pretreatment PSA of 8 ng/ml confirms a favorable outcome, 88% bNED control at 5 years for < 8 ng/ml and 74% for a pretreatment PSA > or = 8 ng/ml (p = 0.007 for overall curve comparison).

CONCLUSION

For early prostate cancer patients (T1/T2AB, Gleason 2-7, pretreatment PSA 4-15) there is a significant break in bNED control following external beam radiation at a pretreatment PSA level of 8 ng/ml. Patients with pretreatment PSA < 8 have a very favorable bNED response with radiation alone while those with a pretreatment PSA 8-15 have a significant decrease in bNED response. The 27% failure rate at 5 years in the PSA 8-15 ng/ml patients may justify altered treatment techniques or clinical trials of adjuvant androgen deprivation in this group.

Beneficial effect of combination hormonal therapy administered prior and following external beam radiation therapy in localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study is to investigate whether combined androgen blockade associated with radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer decreases at 12 and 24 months the rate of positive follow-up biopsies and serum PSA compared to radiation therapy alone. This is the report of an interim analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and twenty patients with clinical Stage B1-T2a, B2-T2b/T2c, and C-T3/T4, adenocarcinoma of the prostate were entered in a prospective randomized study. After written informed consent, the subjects were randomly allocated between external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) alone (group 1), 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy (LHRH-agonist + Flutamide) prior to EBRT (group 2), and a third group receiving combination therapy 3 months before, during, and 6 months after EBRT. There is no significant difference between the three groups concerning age, stage of disease, grade of tumor, and pretreatment PSA levels. Control transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsies (one core was taken from the initial cancer site regardless of the presence or absence of TRUS abnormalities) were done 12 and 24 months after the end of EBRT. Serum PSA measurements were done on schedule visits.

RESULTS

Ninety-two and 68 patients underwent biopsies at 12 and 24 months, respectively, after the end of radiation therapy. While 62% of control patients at 12 months in Group 1 disclosed residual neoplasm, only 30% and 4% showed residual disease in groups 2 and 3, respectively (p = 0.00005). When looking at 24 months, 65, 28, and 5% showed residual cancer for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = 0.00001). The PSA measurements indicate also at 12 months a difference between the three groups (p < 0.0001), except at 24 months, the difference between the group 2 and 3 is no longer significant.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary analysis of this clinical trial indicates that patients treated with radiation therapy alone show a significantly higher rate of positive biopsies at 12 and 24 months after the end of radiation therapy as compared with those treated with total antiandrogen blockade (TAB) and radiation therapy. When analyzing the median PSA serum levels, we found the same advantage at 12 months, but, at the time of the analysis at 24 months, the PSA levels are not different between groups 2 and 3.

Does brachytherapy have a role in the treatment of prostate cancer?

The goal of radiation therapy is to deliver a high dose to the tumor while preserving normal surrounding tissue. For early-stage prostate cancer, the ultimate conformal irradiation is to place radioactive sources directly into the gland either as permanent or temporary seeds. Permanent seed implantation is capable of delivering two times the radiobiologically equivalent dose of external beam irradiation to the prostate and tumor. In the past, the results of prostate brachytherapy were likely poor owing to the technical difficulty in accurately placing the radioactive seeds uniformly throughout the prostate. The use of low-dose-rate I-125 to treat high-grade cancers probably also contributed to the poorer results as compared with external beam irradiation. Over the last 10 years, however, technologic advances in transrectal ultrasonography, computer dosimetry, and template-based transperineal techniques have dramatically improved the accuracy and consistency of the brachytherapist to place radioactive sources directly into the prostate gland. Transperineal ultrasound or CT directed seed implantation has replaced the older retropubic method. Brachytherapists are now able to accurately map out the gland prior to the implant and carefully evaluate preoperatively seed placement. The availability of such radioactive sources as iodine-125, palladium-103, and iridium-192 has also given the brachytherapist isotopes that can be more carefully matched to the biology and stage of the tumor. More sensitive definitions of failure have prompted radiation oncologists and urologists to carefully evaluate the efficacy of external beam irradiation and surgery. Accurate comparison of the efficacy of brachytherapy to surgery and to external beam radiation requires a randomized study. Comparisons of retrospective studies are fraught with the problems of the heterogeneous nature of early-stage prostate cancer. Imbalances in stage, grade, initial PSA extraprostatic disease, and nodal status of patient groups make comparisons difficult. Most of the long-term data for permanent seed implantation are the result of work at a single institution. These results will need to be repeated at other institutions treating patients in a similar manner. Because techniques vary from institution to institution, permanent implant results will need to be carefully evaluated for technique as well as stratified for pretreatment variables. Pretreatment PSA and grade appear to be more sensitive variables than stage in predicting failure after radiation. As more patients are diagnosed with very early and nonpalpable disease, future studies will need to stratify patients based on these pretreatment factors. Patients with early-stage disease but identified as high risk for extraprostatic disease will require more intensive regimens. The treatment outcomes based on biopsy results are inconclusive. A lack of consensus on the definition of a truly positive biopsy remains forthcoming. The value of a positive prostate biopsy as an outcome predictor for clinical failure is still unclear. The use of prostate nuclear cell antigen staining may help clarify the issue. Comparison of treatment outcome based on absolute PSA is also difficult. The Seattle series suggest that brachytherapy by permanent seed implantation is as efficacious as external beam irradiation for early-stage disease in patients with a low PSA (< 10 ng/mL). As the PSA value rises above 10 ng/mL, the probability of failure after external beam rises substantially. Results from the Seattle series suggest an advantage to seed implant alone or the judicious application of seed implant boost to external beam radiation for these patients with more advanced cancer. The most sensitive measurement of therapeutic outcome is progression-free survival. Few studies to date have evaluated progression-free survival.

Conformal prostate brachytherapy: initial experience of a phase I/II dose-escalating trial

PURPOSE

To improve treatment results on prostatic adenocarcinoma, conformal radiation therapy (CRT) has been used. Two major drawbacks of external CRT are: (a) internal organ motion/daily set-up variations, and (b) exclusion of several patients for CRT based on poor geometrical relationships as identified by three dimensional (3D) treatment planning. To overcome the above problems, we began the first prospective Phase I/II dose-escalating clinical trial of conformal brachytherapy (CB) and concurrent external beam irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-nine patients with T2b-T3c prostatic adenocarcinoma received 176 transperineal ultrasound-guided conformal high-dose rate (HDR) boost implants. All patients received concomitant external beam pelvic irradiation. Dose escalation of the three HDR-CB fractions proceeded as follows: 5.5 Gy (30 patients), 6 Gy (20 patients), and 6.5 Gy (9 patients). The CB dose was prescribed to the prostate contour as outlined using an online biplanar transrectal ultrasound probe. The urethra, anterior rectal wall, and prostate boundaries were identified individually and outlined at 5 mm intervals from the base to the apex of the gland. The CB using real-time ultrasound guidance with interactive online isodose distributions was performed on an outpatient basis. As needles were placed into the prostate, corrections for prostate displacement were recorded and the isodose distributions were recalculated to represent the new relationship between the needles, prostate, and normal structures. No computerized tomography (CT) planning or implant preplanning was required.

RESULTS

No patient was rejected based on poor geometrical relation of pelvic structures. In every implant performed, prostate displacement was noted. Craniocaudal motion of the gland ranged from 0.5-2.0 cm (mean = 1.0 cm), whereas lateral displacement was 0.1-0.4 cm. With the interactive online planning system, organ motion was immediately detected, accounted for, and corrected prior to each HDR treatment. The rectal dose has ranged from 45 to 87%, and the urethral dose from 97 to 112% of the prostate dose. It is significant to note that operator dependence has been completely removed because the interactive online planning system uniformly guides the physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

With ultrasound guidance and the interactive online dosimetry system, organ motion (as compared to external beam) is insignificant because it can be corrected during the procedure without increasing target volume margins. Common pitfalls of brachytherapy, including operator dependence and difficulty with reproducibility, have been eliminated with the intraoperative online planning system.

Patterns of care survey results: treatment planning for carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

Treatment planning has been defined differently at various institutions to encompass tasks ranging from the initial evaluation of the patient to the delivery of the treatment as well as a more narrow view, focused primarily on isodose computation. To evaluate the impact of much of the new treatment-planning technology that has become available, it is necessary to define and develop recommended guidelines for the treatment-planning process.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The 1989 Patterns of Care Study (PCS) included questionnaires to access treatment planning practices currently in use for the entire census of oncology facilities in the United States. These questionnaires were developed by a consensus committee consisting of both physicists and radiation oncologists whose charge was to formulate a description of current treatment-planning practices. The description was based on the committee's experience and knowledge of the treatment-planning process considered to be widely available and in general use, as well as a review of the literature. From the description of the treatment-planning process, a set of guidelines for treatment planning was developed for prostate as well as each of the other disease sites included in the PCS. Data from the study defined the general structure, methodology, process, and tools used by each institution involved in the Patterns of Care Survey Study. National averages for all of the variables were calculated with weighted averages, with the weights reflecting the sample design and number of patients in the different types of facilities. The data were stratified according to academic, hospital, or free-standing facility and were compared with the Consensus Guidelines for Treatment Planning of the Prostate.

DISCUSSION

Based on the consensus statement, the treatment-planning process was separated into the following categories: (a) Treatment-Planning Workup, (b) Treatment Plan Implementation, (c) Treatment Delivery, (d) Treatment Verification, and (e) Quality Assurance. The results from the survey were summarized for each category and compared with the consensus statement.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is an increasing trend toward using computed tomography (CT) information to acquire individualized patient data, volume definition and localization are often completed in the simulator without the direct use of CT information (47%). As more sophisticated beam arrangements and blocking are used, one needs to look at the full three-dimensional (3D) volume to ensure that there are no marginal misses due to blocking and beam arrangement. Improved and more widespread use of immobilization devices is also required with conformal treatments and reduced margins. The results of the survey helped to identify and establish the standard of practice for treatment planning of the prostate as well as to provide documentation for better defining a complete description of the treatment planning process. Well-documented guidelines will provide more consistent treatment of patients, which should have an impact on outcome.

Ultrasound-guided high dose rate conformal brachytherapy boost in prostate cancer: treatment description and preliminary results of a phase I/II clinical trial

PURPOSE

To improve results for locally advanced prostate cancer, a prospective clinical trial of concurrent external beam irradiation and fractionated iridium-192 (Ir-192) high dose rate (HDR) conformal boost brachytherapy was initiated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between November 1991 and February 1994, 99 implants were performed on 33 patients with prostatic adenocarcinoma at William Beaumont Hospital. Using AJCC staging criteria, 9 patients had T2b tumors, 17 patients had T2c tumors, and 7 patients had T3 disease. Patients were treated with (a) 45.6 Gy whole pelvis external irradiation and (b) three HDR fractions of 5.5 Gy each (18 patients) or 6 Gy each (15 patients) to the prostate. Transperineal needle implants using real-time ultrasound guidance with interactive on-line isodose distributions were performed on an outpatient basis during weeks 1, 2, and 3 of external irradiation. Acute toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) morbidity grading system.

RESULTS

This technique of concurrent external pelvic irradiation and conformal HDR brachytherapy was well tolerated. No significant intraoperative or perioperative complications occurred. Three patients (9%) experienced Grade 3 acute toxicity (two dysuria and one diarrhea). All toxicities were otherwise Grades 1 or 2 and were primarily as expected from pelvic external irradiation. Persistent implant-related toxicities included Grades 1-2 perineal pain (12%) and hematospermia (15%). Median follow-up time was 13 months. Serum prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) levels normalized in 91% of patients (29 out of 32) within 1-14 months (median 2.8 months) after irradiation. PSA levels were progressively decreasing in the other three patients at last measurement. Prospectively planned prostatic rebiopsies done at 18 months in the first 10 patients were negative in 9 out of 10 (90%).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute toxicity has been acceptable with this unique approach using conformal high dose rate Ir-192 boost brachytherapy with concurrent external irradiation. The initial tumor response as assessed by serial PSA measurement and rebiopsy is extremely encouraging. Dose escalation will proceed in accordance with the protocol guidelines. Further patient accrual and longer follow-up will allow comparison to other techniques.

Prostate cancer and radiation therapy--the message conveyed by serum prostate-specific antigen

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a powerful pretreatment prognosticator and a sensitive post-treatment outcome measure for clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy. Today, the pretreatment serum PSA level appears to supersede both grade and T-stage as a determinant of outcome. This study was undertaken to attempt a reconciliation between the old (pre-PSA) and the new (PSA) data-in particular to address the question of why stage and grade apparently play so little role in this PSA era.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We analyzed the outcome of two cohorts of men with T1-T4, NO, or NX, MO prostate cancer, one group (648 patients) treated and followed in the pre-PSA era (1966-1988), another group (707 patients) treated and followed in the PSA era (1987-1993)--who received definitive radiation as their only initial treatment. The patterns of relapse and prognostic factors for these groups were compared and contrasted using univariate and multivariate techniques.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 6.5 years, the relapse patterns in the pre-PSA series were: local in 109 (17%), nodal in 17 (3%), and distant metastatic in 186 (29%). Actuarial local and metastatic rates at 5 years were 13 and 26%, respectively. Local recurrence was only weakly predictable, Gleason grade being the only significant, albeit weak, covariate. Metastatic failure, however, was highly significantly and meaningfully correlated with Gleason grade and T-stage. Because metastasis was the most common adverse end point in this series, overall freedom from progression also correlated with grade and stage. At a median follow-up of 31 months, the patterns of failure in the PSA series were: local in 77 (11%), nodal in 3 (< 1%), and distant metastatic in 24 (3%). Actuarial local and metastatic rates at 5 years were 30 and 6%, respectively. Local recurrence was highly and meaningfully correlated with pretreatment PSA level, which was the only significant determinant of this end point. Metastatic failure was highly correlated with Gleason grade and T-stage, with PSA playing a much lesser, though significant role. The inversion of failure patterns (local vs. distant) between the two series was striking. The high incidence of local failure in the PSA series was almost entirely related to positive prostatic biopsies pursuant to the investigation of the postradiation rising PSA profile. Of the 77 local recurrences, 69 (90%) were identified in this way. Among 99 men with rising PSA values who underwent investigation (CT scans, bone scans, and biopsies), disease was found in 86, and the patterns of disease in these 86 were: local only in 62 (72%), local and metastatic in 7, and metastatic in 17 (20%). The most common event in the PSA series was the rising PSA profile, and this, too, strongly correlated with the pretreatment PSA level.

CONCLUSION

Based on our earlier finding that the major source of pretreatment serum PSA in patients with clinically localized disease is the primary tumour itself and on the findings in the present report, we conclude that the new major message conveyed by serum PSA relates to the primary tumor and its likely outcome. Gleason grade and T-stage remain major determinants of metastatic relapse. The total and permanent eradication of prostate cancer from the prostate with conventional doses of external beam radiation therapy is harder to achieve than generally appreciated.

Reference range for prostate-specific antigen levels after external beam radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate

OBJECTIVES

To determine a reference range for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in patients who have had external beam radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

METHODS

Serum PSA levels were serially measured with the Hybritech Tandem-R assay in 35 patients who had completed radiation therapy for a mean of 51 +/- 32 months (range, 10 to 133).

RESULTS

Serum PSA levels that were greater than 2.0 ng/mL (n = 20) continued to rise at a rate of more than 1 ng/mL per year, whereas levels between 0.0 and 2.0 ng/mL (n = 15) remained stable for an average of 71 +/- 32 months (range, 22 to 133). One of these latter 15 patients had a false-negative PSA level when he experienced a biopsy-positive prostate nodule and positive bone scan 43 months after therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate cancer control after radiation therapy was indicated in most men by a PSA reference range of 0.0 to 2.0 ng/mL. Cancer activity was indicated in all men with levels above this range.

Prostate-specific antigen and radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to: (a) define the prognostic significance of pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in localized prostate cancer treated with radiation; (b) define the prognostic usefulness of postradiation PSA levels; (c) evaluate the outcome of radiation using PSA as an endpoint.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Disease outcome in 707 patients with Stages T1 (205 men), T2 (256 men), T3 (239 men), and T4 (7 men), receiving definitive external radiation as sole therapy, was evaluated using univariate and multivariate techniques.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 31 months, 157 patients (22%) developed relapse or a rising PSA. Multivariate analysis revealed pretreatment PSA level to be the most significant prognostic factor, with lesser though significant contributions due to Gleason grade (2-6 vs. 7-10) and transurethral resection in T3/T4 disease. The following four prognostic groupings were defined: group I, PSA < or = 4 ng/ml, any grade; group II, 4 < PSA < or = 20, grades 2-6; group III, 4 < PSA < or = 20, grades 7-10; group IV, PSA > 20, any grade. Five-year actuarial relapse rates in these groups were: I, 12%; II, 34%; III, 40%; and IV, 81%. Posttreatment nadir PSA was an independent determinant of outcome and only patients with nadir values < 1 ng/ml fared well (5-year relapse rate 20%). Using rising PSA as an endpoint the 461 patients with T1/T2 disease had an actuarial freedom from disease rate of 70% at 5 years, which appeared to plateau, suggesting that many were cured. No plateau was evident for T3/T4 disease.

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment serum PSA is the single most important predictor of disease outcome after radiation for local prostate cancer. Tumor grade has a lesser though significant prognostic role. Postirradiation nadir PSA value during the first year is a sensitive indicator of response to treatment. Only nadir values < 1 ng/ml are associated with a favorable outlook. A significant fraction of men with T1/T2 disease may be cured with radiation. There was no evidence for a cured fraction among patients with T3/T4 disease.

Prostate-specific antigen for pretreatment prediction and posttreatment evaluation of outcome after definitive irradiation for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to assess the predictive value of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and the difference between clinical and PSA disease-free status in patients with long-term follow-up after irradiation for prostatic carcinoma. Comparison of the distribution of prognostic factors between surgical and radiation series was also made.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1975-1989, 652 patients with clinical Stage A2-C prostatic adenocarcinoma were definitively irradiated using external beam therapy. One hundred and fifty patients with banked serum and up to 14 years follow-up have pretreatment PSA levels and 355 patients with up to 17 years follow-up have posttreatment values. Treatment failure was analyzed by tumor stage, grade, and four pretreatment PSA categories. Disease-progression was evaluated by clinical and biochemical (PSA) endpoints. Prognostic factors were compared to two surgical series.

RESULTS

A significant difference was seen in clinical and PSA disease-free (PSA < or = 4.0 ng/ml) status based on tumor grade, stage, and pretreatment PSA category. Although the expected clinical outcome has been well-documented previously, results based on posttreatment PSA levels show 5-year disease-free survivals reduced by 10-16% and 10-year survivals lessened by 15-39% depending upon the particular tumor grade and stage. The earlier stage, lower grade tumors showed the largest difference between clinical and biochemical recurrence rates at the longest interval from treatment. Even more notable were the differences in the clinical and PSA disease-free rates based on the pretreatment PSA level. Comparing the irradiated patients to two surgical series showed that the former had a larger percentage of more advanced stage tumors with more unfavorable PSA levels as compared to prostatectomy patients.

CONCLUSION

With long-term follow-up, the pretreatment PSA level continues to be a powerful predictor of clinical and biochemical outcome in patients irradiated for apparently localized prostate cancer. Differences between clinical and PSA outcome can be considerable, but oftentimes clinically insignificant. The distribution of prognostic factors between radiation and prostatectomy series seems to favor the latter.

Intracavitary birdcage resonator: applications to the human prostate

Twenty-five patients with prostatic cancer were prospectively examined with a prototype endorectal surface coil featuring a birdcage resonator circuit design. The purpose was to determine the safety of an intracavitary probe for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the pelvis that incorporates the "inside-out" characteristics of a volume coil design and allows high-resolution MR imaging of the prostate and potentially serves as an alternative to single-loop intracavitary surface coils. Clinically useful images supplementing images obtained with the body or external surface coils were obtained with the prototype probe. It was tolerated by all patients enrolled in the study, and none experienced side effects. The cylindrically symmetric sensitivity profile of the probe allowed identification of prostate tumors and pelvic lymph node and bone metastases. Volume-type coils may improve endopelvic MR imaging when used alone or in combination with external coil systems.

The source of pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen in clinically localized prostate cancer--T, N, or M?

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is an important marker for prostate cancer and has been shown to be secreted from the primary tumor and from metastases. However, the relative contribution of the primary and micrometastatic disease to the serum level of PSA in patients with clinically localized disease has not been delineated. This study addresses the source of pretreatment serum PSA in patients with clinically localized disease.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The fall in serum PSA level following radical prostatectomy (280 patients; 105 T1, 165 T2, 10 T3) or definitive radiotherapy (427 patients; 122 T1, 147 T2, 158 T3/T4) was analyzed with the assumption that any fall in PSA following local treatment reflects the fraction of PSA produced in the prostate and its primary tumor.

RESULTS

Serum PSA level became undetectable in 277 of the 280 (99%) patients within 6 months of radical prostatectomy. The three patients who did not achieve undetectable levels had postsurgical values < or = 0.9 ng/ml. Following definitive radiotherapy, nadir serum PSA values were between < or = 0.3 and 20.3 ng/ml, with mean and median values of 1.9 and 1.2 ng/ml, respectively. Nadir PSA was undetectable in 52 patients (12%). Four patients' PSA did not fall, but rose from the start, and each developed metastatic disease within 9 months, and in each metastases appeared to contribute to pretreatment serum PSA. In the remaining patients, the maximal factor by which PSA fell to its nadir was higher the higher the pretreatment PSA level. We present arguments that this is most consistent with the hypothesis that virtually all detectable pretreatment serum PSA derives from the primary tumor. Confirmatory evidence that little of the pretreatment serum PSA came from metastases was obtained by extrapolating the rising PSA profile in 97 patients back to pretreatment time. Back-extrapolated PSA contributed a mean of 7% and a median of 5% to the pretreatment serum value. Because such back-extrapolated values estimate the potentially maximal micrometastatic contribution, metastatic disease at diagnosis contributes little to pretreatment serum PSA.

CONCLUSION

In patients with clinically localized prostate cancer, putative micrometastatic disease contributes negligibly to the pretreatment serum PSA level even when the latter is high. Most likely such patients, when they have metastases, have a very low metastatic burden.

Detection of residual prostate cancer after external radiotherapy. Role of prostate specific antigen and transrectal ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of positive post-radiotherapy biopsies has been reported, the range is considerable (19-93%) and depends partly on patient-selection criteria. In addition, the prognostic significance of transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) used alone and in combination in predicting residual cancer after radiotherapy has yet to be determined.

METHODS

Transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies were performed on 31 unselected patients with prostate cancer 34-77 months (mean, 51 months) after definitive external beam radiotherapy was completed. Biopsy results were compared for pre- and posttreatment parameters (clinical stage, grade, PSA, and TRUS).

RESULTS

In 22 patients (71%), residual cancer was detected histologically by biopsy. All but one patient (12/13, 92%) with a pretherapy PSA value greater than 10 ng/mL had a positive biopsy compared with 50% of those (7/14) with a pretherapy PSA value less than or equal to 10 (P < 0.05). After radiotherapy, a positive biopsy was noted for 15 of 16 patients (94%) with a PSA value greater than 2 and in 20 of 23 (87%) of those with abnormal TRUS findings (P < 0.01 and P < 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The most clinically useful model for predicting histologically identifiable residual cancer was either a serum PSA value greater than 2 or a PSA value less than or equal to 2 and abnormal TRUS findings. The positive and negative predictive values of the model were 84% and 83%, respectively. The model predicted biopsy results correctly in 26 of 31 patients (84%). Transrectal ultrasonography is recommended as a diagnostic tool for patients whose PSA level ranges from a detectable level to less than or equal to 2 ng/mL.

Radiation therapy for T1 and T2 prostate cancer: prostate-specific antigen and disease outcome

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate disease outcome using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as an outcome measure in patients with T1 or T2 prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy in the PSA era.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcome for 461 patients with T1 (n = 205) or T2 (n = 256) prostate cancer followed for a median of 31 months after radiation therapy as the sole initial treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to delineate significant prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The freedom from relapse or rising PSA rate was 70% at 6 years and the survival rate was 83%. Although T stage, Gleason grade, serum prostatic acid phosphatase level, and serum PSA level were each significant determinants of outcome in univariate analysis, pretreatment PSA level was the only clearly independent covariate (P < 0.0001) in multivariate analysis. The 5-year actuarial freedom from relapse or from rising PSA levels is shown according to the pretreatment PSA level: 4 ng/mL or less (117 patients), 91%; more than 4 but 10 ng/mL or less (169 patients), 69%; more than 10 but 20 ng/mL or less (118 patients), 62%; and more than 20 ng/mL (57 patients), 38%. PSA doubling times in 75 patients with rising post-treatment profiles ranged from 1.3 to 78.2 months (mean, 14.4; median 11.3). Faster doubling times correlated significantly with adverse pretreatment prognostic factors (high-grade, high pretreatment PSA, and aneuploidy). To date, the survival rate of patients with rising PSA profiles was not depressed below the expected.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy is an acceptable modality for treating T1 or T2 disease and produces results comparable to those following radical prostatectomy when patients are stratified according to their pretreatment PSA value. The rapid PSA doubling times observed in patients with relapsing disease are more consistent with a "selective" rather than an "aggravation" mechanism.

Observations of pretreatment prostate-specific antigen doubling time in 107 patients referred for definitive radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine pretreatment prostate-specific antigen doubling times (PSADT) in patients referred for definitive radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred and seven patients with histologically proven nonmetastatic prostate cancer and an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) who were referred for radiation therapy had three serum PSA values obtained prior to the start of definitive therapy. Prostate-specific antigen doubling times were calculated by linear regression.

RESULTS

Prostate-specific antigen values increased during the period of observation in 78 patients (73%). Forty-three patients (40%) had calculated PSADT of less than 2 years and of those patients with pretreatment serum PSA values of greater than 10 ng/mL more than 50% has calculated PSADT of less than 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant minority of patients referred for radiotherapy have calculated PSADT of less than 2 years. The significance of this relatively fast growth rate is as yet undetermined, but suggests that patients referred for radiotherapy may have aggressive disease prior to treatment.

Primary radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostatic cancer

Prostatic carcinoma is one of the leading causes of male cancer deaths. However, the routine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have not yet been established. Although the outcome of surgical and radiotherapeutical approaches has frequently been reported to be comparable, the profile of side effects is different. This could offer the basis for selecting the treatment of choice in individual cases. During the last decade the radiotherapeutical technique has markedly improved, in part due to the achievements in the field of computer assisted tomography planning and conformal technique; the outcome of side-effects has decreased with concurrent increase in the rate of local control. The prescribing, recording and reporting of irradiation have also recently developed, as well as the staging of the disease. Therefore we consider it timely to review progress in this subject and to emphasize the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostatic cancer.

Prostate specific antigen as an outcome variable for T1 and T2 prostate cancer treated by radiation therapy

Between 1987 and 1991, 269 patients with clinical stage T1 or T2, N0 or Nx adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent external beam radiation therapy as the sole initial treatment and were followed with serial prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels for 9 to 73 months (mean 33, median 30). Of the patients 26 had clinical evidence of disease relapse, 58 had an increasing PSA profile and 62 had either relapse or an increasing PSA. The actuarial incidence of increasing PSA was 30% at 5 years and the incidence of relapse or increasing PSA was 36% at the same time. With relapse or increasing PSA level as an end point, pretreatment PSA level, Gleason grade and serum prostatic acid phosphatase level were individually significant covariates. However, in multivariate analysis only pretreatment PSA level was significant. The 5-year actuarial rates of relapse or increasing PSA according to pretreatment PSA level were 4 ng./ml. or less-14%, greater than 4 to 10 ng./ml.-33%, greater than 10 to 30 ng./ml.-55% and greater than 30 ng./ml.-greater than 80%. Post-irradiation PSA levels at 3 and 6 months provided prognostic information additional to that inherent before treatment. However, the nadir PSA value, achieved typically at 6 to 12 months, was the most significant aspect of posttreatment PSA. Patients with a nadir PSA level of less than 1 ng./ml. fared well, with a 12% incidence of relapse or increasing PSA at 5 years. Nadir values exceeding 1 ng./ml. were associated with an increasing relapse rate as the nadir value increased, and nearly two-thirds of the cases in which the nadir exceeded 4 ng./ml. failed by 2 years. When increasing PSA was used as an end point additional to relapse, the outcome in this series was significantly worse than in an earlier series evaluated without PSA. Comparing these 2 series resulted in an estimate that PSA begins to increase approximately 4 to 5 years before the appearance of clinically overt disease. These results reveal the high significance of pretreatment PSA levels, significance of nadir PSA values after treatment, earlier detection of persistent disease by the increasing PSA profile, and the fact that total and permanent eradication of localized prostate cancer is considerably more difficult than traditionally believed. The therapeutic implications of this series, and the implications on the quantity and quality of patient lives await prospective study.