Report of phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with radical thoracic irradiation (60 Gy), infusional fluorouracil, bolus cisplatin and etoposide for clinical stage IIIB and bulky IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.

Chemotherapy and High Dose Radiotherapy Followed by Resection for Locally Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancers

OBJECTIVES

For locally advanced but technically operable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is frequently used. Ideal radiotherapy dose in this context is unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six NSCLC patients with N2 disease were retrospectively reviewed. All received preoperative concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Gross tumor volumes received a median of 58 Gy (range, 50-60 Gy).

RESULTS

Two patients experienced major complications and died, resulting in a postoperative mortality rate of 7.7%. Three patients (11.5%) had minor complications. Pathologic specimens revealed downstaging in 76.9% of patients. The pathologic complete response (CR) rate was 34.6%. Downstaging of nodes was observed in 20 of 26 patients. With a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the 1- and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 80.2% and 45.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year actuarial disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 76.9% and 37.3%, respectively. Patients experiencing mediastinal downstaging had better DFS rates, relative to patients that did not (18-month DFS = 79.2% vs. 0%; P = 0.0001). Differences in RT dose (50-60 Gy) and types of chemotherapeutic regimens did not significantly impact pathologic downstaging rates, CR rates, DFS, or survival.

DISCUSSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with high-dose concurrent RT is well tolerated and results in favorable outcomes.

Successful coronary artery bypass grafting after concurrent chemoradiation therapy in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer: case report and review of the literature

Mediastinal irradiation has been a major component of the treatment of Hodgkin disease as well as breast and lung tumors. A potentially devastating posttreatment complication of mediastinal irradiation is the development of premature coronary artery disease. Coronary bypass grafting in such patients is difficult because of the presence of extensive radiation-induced mediastinal fibrosis. We present a rare case of patient with non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent successful coronary bypass grafting despite having previously received full-dose thoracic irradiation in conjunction with concurrent chemotherapy.

[Neoadjuvant chemoradiation in non-small cell lung cancer]

In 2006 preoperative chemoradiation is a major part of the treatment of stage III locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Previous studies have clearly demonstrated the feasibility both regarding toxicities and resectability rates of the sequential and concurrent combination of radiation to chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting. However, induction chemoradiation has never been randomly compared to exclusive preoperative chemotherapy. Besides, the doses of radiation and the optimal drug combination remain undetermined at the time. Regarding the global therapeutic strategy of stage III non-small cell lung cancer, recently reported phase III trials evaluating the role of surgical resection after induction chemotherapy or chemoradiation, all showed the prognostic importance of the tumoral and mediastinal downstaging to select patients really benefiting from surgery. These developments make of the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer a model for multimodal therapeutic strategies combining chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery.

Effects of radiation therapy on oesophageal transit in patients with inner quadrant breast tumour

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate quantitatively the effect of low doses of radiation therapy on the oesophageal transit in patients with inner quadrant breast carcinoma.

METHODS

Eighteen female patients with locally advanced inner quadrant breast tumour were included in this study. A total dose of 5000 cGy in 25 fractions of 200 cGy was applied from four different treatment portals to all patients. Oesophageal motility was evaluated before and immediately after radiotherapy using oesophageal scintigraphy. The oesophageal transit times (ETTs) for the upper one-third, the lower two-thirds portion and the whole oesophagus were calculated.

RESULTS

The upper one-third portion of the oesophagus received a mean dose of 600 cGy and the lower two-thirds portion received a mean dose of 1530 cGy as a result of 5000 cGy dose application. All of the patients developed grade 1 oesophageal toxicity. Post-radiation therapy ETT values were significantly higher compared to pre-radiation therapy ETT values (P<0.001). Before irradiation, ETT values for the upper one-third, distal two-thirds of the oesophagus and the whole oesophagus were 4.77+/-1.08, 11.22+/-2.85 and 11.61+/-2.97 s, respectively. After irradiation, ETT values for the upper one-third, distal two-thirds of the oesophagus and the whole oesophagus were 6.92+/-2.15, 23.30+/-5.65 and 23.74+/-5.70 s, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Oesophageal transit seems to be affected by radiation even without a clinically significant oesophageal symptom and oesophageal scintigraphy allows sensitive, non-invasive and quantifiable assessment of the oesophageal transit time.

Amifostine reduces radiochemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Radiochemotherapy (RCT) is an effective treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, but can be limited by acute and late toxicities (esophagitis, pneumonitis, and myelosuppression). This trial investigated whether pretreatment with amifostine (Ethyol, WR-2721; MedImmune, Inc, Gaithersburg, MD), a radioprotector, could reduce the incidence of RCT-induced acute and late toxicities. Between October 1997 and August 1999, 73 patients with previously untreated stage IIIa-IIIb non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to treatment with RCT alone or RCT plus amifostine (300 mg/m(2) daily intravenous infusion). Chemotherapy consisted of either paclitaxel (60 mg/m(2)) or carboplatin (area under the concentration-curve of 2) once weekly during a 5- to 6-week course of conventional radiotherapy given as 2 Gy daily fraction, 5 days a week to a total dose of 55 to 60 Gy. Esophagitis and acute lung toxicity were evaluated during treatment; late lung toxicity was assessed at 3 and 6 months after RCT and was graded from 0 to 4 according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Esophageal endoscopy was performed the fourth week during RCT and 1 month after the end of RCT. Endoscopic findings of radiation esophagitis were scored from 0 to 3. There was no significant difference between treatment arms in baseline patient characteristics. A total of 68 patients were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy (RCT group, n = 32; RCT plus amifostine, n = 36). The incidence of grade >or= 3 esophagitis during RCT was significantly lower for patients receiving amifostine than for those receiving RCT alone (38.9% v 84.4%; P <.001). The incidence of grade >or= 3 acute pulmonary toxicity was also significantly reduced in amifostine-treated patients (19.4% v 56.3%; P =.002). At 3 months following RCT, patients treated with amifostine had a significantly lower incidence of pneumonitis than those who received RCT alone (P =.009). Endoscopic grade >or= 2 esophagitis was observed in eight of 15 patients in the RCT group and in three of 18 patients in the RCT plus amifostine group (P =.061). No significant differences in response rates were noted between patients receiving RCT with or without amifostine (P =.498). Amifostine is effective in reducing the incidence of both acute and late toxicities associated with RCT in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer without compromising antitumor efficacy.

Concurrent paclitaxel-cisplatin and twice-a-day irradiation in stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC shows improvement in local control and survival with acceptable hematologic toxicity

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has one of the highest death rates among the various forms of cancer. In attempts to improve on this unsatisfactory outcome, different radiation schedules and chemo-therapy agents have been examined in phase II or III studies. These have led to modest improvements in local control and survival, but combined therapies are associated with substantial hematologic toxicity. In this phase II study, 80 consecutive stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC patients were treated with concomitant chemotherapy and twice-a-day irradiation in a total dose of 60 Gy in 1.5 Gy fractions. Patients scheduled for surgery received 45 Gy only. Paclitaxel (30 mg/m 2 ) on days 1-4 and cisplatin (100 mg/m 2 ) on day 5 were administered in the first and fourth weeks of treatment. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (30 ng/m 2 ) was given on days 10-15. The local control, the 1- and 2-year survival rates and the occurrence of acute hematologic toxicity in the non-surgically treated patients were examined. Fifty-two patients were treated without and 28 with surgery. Among the non-surgically treated cases, 43 were evaluable for response and 47 for acute toxicity during a median follow-up of 22 months. The rate of local control was 65% (28/43), and the 1- and 2-year survival rates proved to be 68% and 48%, respectively, with a median survival of 28 months. Severe acute grade 3-4 toxicities included grade 4 leukopenia in 6 cases (13%), grade 3 leukopenia in 4 cases (9%), grade 3 esophagitis in 3 cases (6%) and grade 3 anemia in 3 cases (6%). Our results and the relevant data from the literature support the application of twice-a-day irradiation with concomitant chemotherapy in stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC. Local control and survival were improved relative to once-a-day irradiation with sequential or concomitant chemotherapy.

[Preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for non-small-cell bronchial cancers]

The very disappointing results obtained by surgery in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer have led to a high active clinical research concerning pre- or postoperative treatment. Preoperative treatment has several distincts goals: to increase survival for patients suitable for surgery, to limit surgery or transform borderline or non resectable cancer into resectable tumors. Available datas on preoperative treatments for non-small-cell lung cancer provide from three types of therapeutics trials: 1/Some phase II studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy have demonstrated that the neoadjuvant approach was feasible, and didn't compromise surgery. 2/Phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, performed for the majority on more extensive cancers, have demonstrated that this approach was also feasible at the expense of higher but still tolerable toxicity. 3/Phase III randomised published trials exclusively deal with preoperative chemotherapy with different results: two of them concerned a small number of patients presenting with non-small-cell lung stage IIIA cancer: they are positive. The third concerned 373 patients presenting with stage I, II, IIIA cancer: the three-year survival was increased by 11%, but this difference is not yet significant. The benefit essentially appeared for stage I and II. One trial comparing preoperative chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy has been reported, concluding to the superiority of the association. These observations suggest that the clinical research should now be different for stages I and II, and stage IIIA.

Endoscopic findings of radiation esophagitis in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for intrathoracic malignancies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The incidence and extent of radiation esophagitis were assessed endoscopically in patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighty-two patients who received thoracic radiotherapy for lung, thymic, or esophageal cancer were investigated endoscopically from July 1991 to the end of 1997. Among them, 23 esophageal cancer patients were treated with radiation alone, and the others were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Esophageal endoscopy was performed during or just after radiotherapy. The presence of radiation esophagitis was assessed and assigned an endoscopic score (i.e. grade 0 for normal, 1 for erythema, 2 for erosion or sloughing, 3 for ulcer, hemorrhage, or stricture). The symptomatic grade was assessed using the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) acute radiation morbidity score.

RESULTS

A correlation was seen between endoscopic and RTOG scores. However, even some patients with RTOG grade 0 to 1 had endoscopic grade 3 esophagitis. Endoscopic grade 3 was observed in 16 (27.1%) patients in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, whereas it did not occur in any patient in the radiation alone group (P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that (1) RTOG score correlates closely to esophageal mucosal damage, and (2) more severe esophagitis occurs in those undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy than those undergoing radiotherapy alone [corrected].

Sequential treatment with vindesine-ifosfamide-platinum (VIP) chemotherapy followed by platinum sensitized radiotherapy in stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

Daily administration of cisplatin concomitant with radiotherapy improved the overall survival in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in one EORTC study. In this study, we prospectively investigated the efficacy and toxicity of a sequential treatment with three cycles of vindesine-ifosfamide-platinum (VIP) induction chemotherapy, followed by daily cisplatin-sensitized radiotherapy.

METHODS

Between June 1993 and June 1995, 23 previously untreated patients with stage IIIB NSCLC with World Health Organization performance status 0 or 1 were included. Chemotherapy consisted of platinum 30 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2 and 3, and vindesine 3 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks. After three cycles and at least stable disease, radiotherapy was started (30 Gy in 10 fractions, followed by a boost of 22 Gy in 10 fractions). Each fraction was preceded by Platinum 6 mg/m2 i.v.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients completed the sequential therapy. One patient died from neutropenic sepsis during the first cycle of chemotherapy, and three patients had progressive disease after chemotherapy. The overall response rate after sequential therapy was 47% (95% confidence interval 24-80), median survival was 10.6 months, 1- and 2-year survival rates were 47 and 16%, respectively. Major toxicity consisted of neurotoxicity grade III-IV in 18% and of leukopenia grade III-IV in 22% of the patients. Acute radiation pneumonitis grade III occurred in 11% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Three-drug VIP induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin-sensitized radiotherapy is feasible, with acceptable, albeit substantial, toxicity. In spite of the theoretically promising sequence of therapies, survival results remain disappointingly low.

Response, toxicity, failure patterns, and survival in five Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials of sequential and/or concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess response, toxicity, failure patterns, and survival differences in three chemotherapy (ChT)/radiation therapy (RT) sequencing strategies for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five completed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials for Stage II-IIIA/B inoperable NSCLC patients employed one of the three following strategy groupings: 1) sequential ChT followed by standard RT (60 Gy in 6 weeks); 2) combined sequential and concurrent ChT and standard RT (60 Gy in 6 weeks); or 3) concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT (69.6 Gy in 6 weeks). All five trials required KPS > or = 70; two trials (314 patients) required <5% weight loss and three trials (147 patients) had no minimum weight loss requirement. In all five trials the ChT used cisplatin with either vinblastine or oral etoposide. Combining data for the five trials yielded an evaluable group of 461 patients. The three methods of sequencing ChT and RT were evaluated for differences in response, acute and late toxicity, patterns of failure, and survival. Acute toxicity was defined as that occurring within 90 days from the start of RT. Late toxicity was defined as that occurring after 90 days from the start of RT. Acute or late toxicity > or = grade 3 was defined as severe. Site of first failure was recorded by date. In-field failure excluded distant metastasis as a failure and included only tissue in the RT treatment field. Overall progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as survival without evidence of intra- or extrathoracic tumor or death from any cause.

RESULTS

Group 1 had a lower overall response rate (63%) compared to either Group 2 (77%) or Group 3 (79%), p = 0.03 and 0.003, respectively. Overall grade 4/5 acute toxicities were nearly equal between groups. The severe nonhematologic acute toxicities were significantly different by strategy group (p < 0.0001). Group 1 and 2 were not statistically different. Group 3 had significantly more patients with severe acute nonhematologic toxicity (55%) than either Group 1 (27%) or 2 (34%) with p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0005, respectively. This was due to a severe acute esophagitis rate of 34% for Group 3 versus 1.3% for Group 1 and 6% for Group 2 (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Overall grade 4/5 late toxicities did not differ by group. Severe late nonhematologic toxicities were different by group (p = 0.0098). Group 1 patients had significantly fewer severe late nonhematologic toxicities (14%) compared to patients in Groups 2 (26%) or 3 (28%) (p = 0.046 and 0.038, respectively). Severe late lung toxicity was 10% for Group 1 compared to 21% and 20% for Groups 2 and 3, respectively. Severe late lung toxicities differed by group (p = 0.033), but not severe late esophagitis (p = 0.077). There were no differences between the three strategy groups for patterns of first failure. The in-field failures were higher in Group 2 (71%) compared to Groups 1 (56%) and 3 (55%), p = 0.0478. Pairwise comparisons yielded p-values of 0.068 and 0.015 for Group 2 versus 1 and Group 2 versus 3, respectively. Three-year PFS was better in Group 2 (15%) and 3 (15%) compared to Group 1 (7%), but not statistically significant (p = 0.454). Similarly, in-field PFS was better in Group 2 (17%) and 3 (20%) than Group 1 (9%), but not significant (p = 0.167). There were improvements in 3-year survival for Group 2 (17%) and Group 3 (25%) compared to Group 1 (15%), but the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.47). The same results were present for patients with less than 5% weight loss and patients with stage IIIA tumors.

CONCLUSION

Thus, concurrent ChT and hyperfractionated RT had a higher incidence of severe acute esophageal toxicity. Severe late lung toxicity with concurrent ChT/hyperfractionated RT, as well as with induction ChT followed by concurrent ChT/standard RT, may be greater compared to sequential ChT/RT. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

[Treatment of stage IIIB loco-regionally advanced non-small-cell bronchial carcinomas with radiation and interferon-beta. Preliminary results of a phase II study]

BACKGROUND

In-vitro and in-vivo studies demonstrated the radiosensitizing effect of interferon beta on malignant tumor tissue as well as simultaneously a radioprotective effect on normal lung tissue. In this phase II study the outcome of combining radiotherapy with interferon beta in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From February 1994 until November 1996 14 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB were treated with locoregional radiation up to 59.4 Gy, with daily doses of 1.8 Gy and 5 fractions per week. Five million units of interferon beta (Fiblaferon) were given intravenously immediately preceding radiotherapy on the first 3 days of week 1, 3 and 5.

RESULTS

Four of 14 patients (28.6%) showed complete response and 7 patients (50%) partial response, resulting in an overall response rate of 78.6%. After a mean follow-up time of 23.3 months the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 56.3%, 37.5% and 37.5%, respectively. The median survival time was 13 months. Three of 14 patients (21.4%) suffered from 7 Grade-3 acute side effects and 2 patients (14.3%) from 1 Grade-3 late toxicity in each case. One further patient, whose right lung was resected 3 months after completion of radiotherapy, developed as a consequence of this operation 2 Grade-4 complications.

CONCLUSION

Considering the toxicity and the preliminary results of combining irradiation and interferon beta in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer it seems, that this procedure is worth to be tested in a phase III study.

Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable Stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We carried out a Phase II trial in an attempt to improve resectability and survivability of inoperable Stage III A and III B nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients by implementing a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy treatment program.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-six patients with locally advanced Stage III NSCLC received neoadjuvant therapy consisting of 50.4 Gy in 5.5 weeks concurrent with two cycles of chemotherapy, using cisplatin and etoposide. No postsurgical consolidation therapy was given.

RESULTS

Assessment at 3 to 6 weeks after treatment suggested that 26 (72%) patients had been rendered resectable. Toxicities were common but usually tolerable; however, one toxic death occurred. Of 24 patients who proceeded to thoracotomy, complete resection was achieved in 20 (56%). There were two surgically related deaths. Surgical-pathological staging showed downstaging in 18 patients, including complete sterilization of the tumor in 3 (8%). The median survival for all 36 patients is 15 months, but at the time of analysis, median survival of resectable patients had not been reached. The actuarial 2-year survival is 39% for all study groups, 57% for resectable patients, and 16% for the remaining (p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

While this preoperative neoadjuvant appears to improve survival of patients with Stage III NSCLC, comparison with previous reports of other similar trials indicate a superior survival advantage in association with higher doses of radiotherapy.

Inhibition of Na+/K(+)-ATPase by phenoxyl radicals of etoposide (VP-16): role of sulfhydryls oxidation

In the present work, we studied the effects of phenoxyl radicals, generated by tyrosinase-catalyzed oxidation of a phenolic antitumor drug, Etoposide (VP-16), on a purified dog kidney Na+/K(+)-ATPase by characterizing interactions of VP-16 phenoxyl radicals with the enzyme's SH-groups by ESR and correlating the loss of the enzymatic activity with the oxidation of its SH-groups, and oxidation of VP-16. VP-16/tyrosinase caused inhibition of Na+/K(+)-ATPase which was dependent on the incubation time and concentration of tyrosinase. The inhibition of Na+/K(+)-ATPase was accompanied by a decrease of DTNB (5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)-titratable SH-groups. In the presence of Na+/K(+)-ATPase, a typical ESR signal of the VP-16 phenoxyl radical could be observed only following a lag period the duration of which was proportional to the concentration of the Na+/K(+)-ATPase added. Our HPLC measurements demonstrated that Na+/K(+)-ATPase protected VP-16 against tyrosinase-catalyzed oxidation. Combined these results suggest that redox-cycling of VP-16/VP-16 phenoxyl radical by SH-groups of Na+/K(+)-ATPase occurred. Ascorbate which is known to reduce the VP-16 phenoxyl radicals, protected the enzyme against inactivation, prevented oxidation of the enzyme's SH-groups. Reduction of VP-16 phenoxyl radicals by ascorbate was directly observed by the semidehydroascorbyl radical signal in the ESR spectra. VP-16 phenoxyl radical-induced oxidation of sulfhydryls and inhibition of the Na+/K(+)-ATPase may be responsible for at least some of its clinical side effects (e.g., cardiotoxicity) which can be prevented by ascorbate.

Chemoradiation in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Resectability, local control, and survival were evaluated in advanced stage nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with simultaneous chemoradiation therapy delivered in an accelerated, interrupted twice-a-day schedule.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-seven consecutive patients with Stage IIIA or IIIB nonsmall cell lung cancer, consenting to participation in the study, received cisplatin, 30 mg/m2 for 3 days, etoposid, 80 mg/m2 for 3 days, and 5-fluorouracil, 900 mg/m2 for 4 days. Radiation therapy consisted of 2 Gy given twice a day for 5 days. Two weeks rest was planned between cycles. Patients were evaluated for resectability after the second cycle. Any patient with unresectable tumor received a third cycle of treatment.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients were evaluable for acute toxicity: eighteen (38%) required an extended rest period for esophagitis or low blood count; 3 (6%) had sepsis, of whom 1 (2%) expired. Three patients (6%) had multiple blood transfusions for low hemoglobin. Median follow-up is 23.6 months, with a range of 10-49 months. Nine patients (19%) failed locally; 15 (32%) had local and distant failure; 7 (15%) failed only at distant sites. Twelve patients (25.5%) are alive with no evidence of disease; 4 patients were lost to follow-up with disease. The 2-year actuarial survival is 49%, and the 4-year is 28.2%.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous chemoradiation is well tolerated with acceptable toxicity. The overall 2- and 4-year actuarial survival is somewhat better than that reported in the literature. Resectability in Stage IIIB patients was not increased with this regimen nor was any surgical specimen free of cancer. The 47% distant failure rate is not different from those reported by others.

The evolution of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocols for nonsmall cell lung cancer

Over the past 2 decades, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has played a significant role in clarifying the role of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RTOG lung cancer research has evolved over this time period through a systematic succession of investigations. For unresectable NSCLC, the dependence of local tumor control and survival on total dose of standard fractionation RT, as well as pretreatment performance characteristics, was demonstrated in initial RTOG trials. Subsequently, further radiation dose intensification was tested using altered fractionation RT to total doses up to 32% higher than standard RT to 60 Gy, given as either hyperfractionation or accelerated fractionation, while attempting to retain acceptable normal tissue toxicity. These higher doses required rethinking of established RT techniques and limitations, as well as careful surveillance of acute and late toxicity. A survival advantage was shown for hyperfractionation to 69.6 Gy, in favorable performance patients, compared to 60 Gy. Further testing of high dose standard RT will use three-dimensional, conformal techniques to minimize toxicity. RTOG further extended the theme of treatment intensification for unresectable NSCLC by evaluating combined chemotherapy (CT) and RT. Improved local control and survival was shown for induction CT followed by standard RT to 60 Gy, compared to standard RT (60 Gy) and altered fractionation RT (69.6 Gy). The intent of current studies is to optimize dose and scheduling of combined CT and standard RT, as well as combined CT and altered fractionation RT. Noncytotoxic RT adjuvants, such as hypoxic cell sensitizers, nonspecific immune stimulants, and biologic response modifiers have also been studied. Resectable NSCLC has also been an RTOG focus, with studies of preoperative and postoperative RT, CT, and CT/RT, including the prognostic value of serum and tissue factors. RTOG studies have yielded incremental improvements in treatment outcome for NSCLC, better understanding of the disease dynamics, and a strong foundation for future investigations.

Concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy for unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of hyperfractionated radiation therapy and induction chemotherapy followed by standard radiation therapy have shown improved survival in patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiosensitization may improve local tumor control when chemotherapy is given concurrently with hyperfractionated radiation therapy, but also may increase toxicity. A Phase I/II trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 90-15, was designed to evaluate whether this strategy could improve survival with acceptable toxicity and be part of a Phase III trial of chemoradiation sequencing.

METHODS

Vinblastine (5 mg/M2 weekly x 5 weeks) and cisplatin (75 mg/M2 days 1, 29, and 50) were given during twice-daily irradiation (1.2 Gy, 6 hours apart) to 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions in 6 weeks. Eligible patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage II (unresected) or IIIA-B NSCLC and Karnofsky performance status 70 or greater; there were no weight loss restrictions.

RESULTS

Of 42 eligible patients, 76% had greater than 5% weight loss, 45% had T4 primary tumors, and 62% were Stage IIIB. All protocol treatment was completed in 53%. Acute toxicity was predominantly hematologic with 19 of 42 (45%) having Grade 4 toxicity or higher, three (7%) with septic death. Ten of 42 (24%) had Grade 3 or higher esophagitis. There were two (4.7%) patients with Grade 3 or higher (1 lung and 1 esophagus) and two (4.7%) with Grade 4 or higher (1 lung and 1 hematologic) late toxicities. Median survival time was 12.2 months, with an overall 1-year survival of 54%, an estimated 2 year survival of 28% and a 1-year progression free survival of 38%.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer, who were not selected on the basis of weight loss, concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy had more intense acute toxicity than hyperfractionation alone, but late toxicity was acceptable. One and 2-year survival rates were 54 and 28%, respectively.

Mitomycin, cisplatin, and vindesine followed by radiotherapy combined with cisplatin in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer: long-term results

PURPOSE

To assess the tolerance, response rate, pattern of failure, and long-term survival of patients with unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with one cycle of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1986 to 1988, 45 patients with histologically proven nonsmall cell lung cancer clinical Stage III (29 IIIA and 16 IIIB) were included in this study. Patients received one cycle of Mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 day 1, Cisplatin 120 mg/m2 day 1, and Vindesine 3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15, and 22, by i.v. bolus injection. Radiotherapy was started within 4-6 weeks after completion of chemotherapy, with a total tumor dose of 60 Gy, at 2 Gy/day. Cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day by i.v. continuous infusion was administered for days 1-5 of radiation treatment.

RESULTS

The main toxic acute effects were nausea-vomiting grade 1-3 in 38 patients (85%). Ten patients (22%) developed esophagitis grade 3. Leukopenia grade 1-2 was observed in 18 patients (40%), grade 3 in 12 (27%), and grade 4 in 4 (9%). Three patients (6.6%) died by granulocytopenia and sepsis. A bronchoscopic proven complete response was achieved in 9 patients (21.5%) and partial response in 28 patients (67%). With a minimum follow-up of 65 months, overall median survival was 13 months, 2-year survival was 21%, and 5-year survival was 7%, with no statistical difference between Stage IIIA and IIIB. Median survival of patients with complete response was 23.2 months, and 5-year survival was 33%.

CONCLUSION

This treatment scheme produced a severe toxicity and in spite of a high response rate, long-term survival is poor, similar to previous studies with radiotherapy alone.

Concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a review

Stage III or locally advanced non-metastatic, non-small cell lung cancers comprise about 40% of all NSCLC. A proportion of patients with Stage III NSCLC can be treated by induction RT/CT followed by surgery, but the majority, in particular all Stage IIIB, are not candidates for this approach. For these patients, RT alone is generally considered as the standard treatment. RT has a modest, but definitive curative potential, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survivals of about 40%, 20% and 5%, respectively, and median survival of 9-12 months. Combination CT-RT, depending on its type and rationale, is aimed at improving survival via a decrease of local or distant failure rates or both. Combined modality (CM) can be subdivided into 3 categories: sequential, concomitant and alternated regimes. Concomitant and alternated CT-RT have some common characteristics and rationale, the overall time playing a central role. This paper reviews studies of inoperable NSCLC treated with these CM, excluding sequential CT-RT trials, which would require a separate discussion. Numerous Phase I-II studies have been recently published on concomitant or alternated schemes and 33 of them are presented in this paper. Although it is hazardous to readily compare their results with those of RT-alone studies, several trials using platin-based combination chemotherapy, concurrently or alternated with RT, have shown impressive response rates and encouraging survivals, at a price of significant toxicity. Seven randomized trials comparing RT alone versus concomitant CT-RT are now available: the 3 non-cisplatin trials have failed to show any improvement in survival with CM, whereas among the 4 cisplatin trials, only one demonstrated a benefit with low-dose cisplatin added to RT. Implications for future clinical research will be discussed.